{"cached_at":"2026-09-02T09:51:43.178553+00:00","cl_docket_id":"68232570","docket":{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","id":68232570,"court":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/courts/nysd/","court_id":"nysd","original_court_info":null,"idb_data":null,"clusters":[],"audio_files":[],"assigned_to":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/people/2045/","referred_to":null,"bankruptcy_information":null,"absolute_url":"/docket/68232570/in-re-hut-8-corp-securities-litigation/","date_created":"2024-02-07T13:09:23.384466-08:00","date_modified":"2026-09-01T18:19:25.853240-07:00","source":1,"appeal_from_str":"","assigned_to_str":"Victor Marrero","referred_to_str":"","panel_str":"","date_last_index":"2024-12-10T03:20:24.511023-08:00","date_cert_granted":null,"date_cert_denied":null,"date_argued":null,"date_reargued":null,"date_reargument_denied":null,"date_filed":"2024-02-07","date_terminated":null,"date_last_filing":"2026-07-14","case_name_short":"","case_name":"IN RE HUT 8 CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION","case_name_full":"","slug":"in-re-hut-8-corp-securities-litigation","docket_number":"1:24-cv-00904","docket_number_core":"2400904","docket_number_raw":"1:24-cv-00904","docket_number_source":0,"federal_dn_office_code":"1","federal_dn_case_type":"cv","federal_dn_judge_initials_assigned":"VM","federal_dn_judge_initials_referred":"","federal_defendant_number":null,"pacer_case_id":"615242","cause":"15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act","nature_of_suit":"Securities/Commodities","jury_demand":"Both","jurisdiction_type":"Federal Question","appellate_fee_status":"","appellate_case_type_information":"","mdl_status":"","filepath_ia":"","filepath_ia_json":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"ia_needs_upload":true,"ia_date_first_change":"2024-02-07T13:09:23.379165-08:00","date_blocked":null,"blocked":false,"appeal_from":null,"parent_docket":null,"tags":[],"panel":[]},"parties":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/14942052/","id":14942052,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600410/","attorney_id":9600410,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600410/","attorney_id":9600410,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600412/","attorney_id":9600412,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"name":"Defendant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2025-01-09T01:40:40.166005-08:00","date_modified":"2025-01-09T01:40:40.166014-08:00","name":"Michael Ho","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/14942051/","id":14942051,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600410/","attorney_id":9600410,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600410/","attorney_id":9600410,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600412/","attorney_id":9600412,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"name":"Defendant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2025-01-09T01:40:40.144964-08:00","date_modified":"2025-01-09T01:40:40.144973-08:00","name":"Asher Genoot","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/14243460/","id":14243460,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600409/","attorney_id":9600409,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600409/","attorney_id":9600409,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":2}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"name":"Movant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2024-06-05T02:45:11.608000-07:00","date_modified":"2024-06-05T02:45:11.608019-07:00","name":"Briana Licitra","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/14243459/","id":14243459,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600409/","attorney_id":9600409,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600409/","attorney_id":9600409,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":2}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"name":"Movant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2024-06-05T02:45:11.580002-07:00","date_modified":"2024-06-05T02:45:11.580021-07:00","name":"Karen Licitra","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/14243458/","id":14243458,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600409/","attorney_id":9600409,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600409/","attorney_id":9600409,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":2}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"name":"Movant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2024-06-05T02:45:11.531317-07:00","date_modified":"2024-06-05T02:45:11.531332-07:00","name":"Mario Licitra","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/14243457/","id":14243457,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600408/","attorney_id":9600408,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600408/","attorney_id":9600408,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":2}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"name":"Movant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2024-06-05T02:45:11.497231-07:00","date_modified":"2024-06-05T02:45:11.497248-07:00","name":"Luigi Salemme","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/14243456/","id":14243456,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8980055/","attorney_id":8980055,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"name":"Movant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2024-06-05T02:45:11.468823-07:00","date_modified":"2024-06-05T02:45:11.468838-07:00","name":"Alizay Saeed","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/14243455/","id":14243455,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600407/","attorney_id":9600407,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"name":"Movant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2024-06-05T02:45:11.369601-07:00","date_modified":"2024-06-05T02:45:11.369616-07:00","name":"Juraj Pesty","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/14243454/","id":14243454,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600402/","attorney_id":9600402,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600402/","attorney_id":9600402,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600405/","attorney_id":9600405,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600405/","attorney_id":9600405,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600406/","attorney_id":9600406,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600406/","attorney_id":9600406,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600403/","attorney_id":9600403,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600404/","attorney_id":9600404,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"name":"Consolidated Plaintiff","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2024-06-05T02:45:11.081841-07:00","date_modified":"2024-06-05T02:45:11.081860-07:00","name":"Mark Latino","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/14243453/","id":14243453,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600402/","attorney_id":9600402,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600402/","attorney_id":9600402,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600403/","attorney_id":9600403,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600404/","attorney_id":9600404,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"name":"Lead Plaintiff","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2024-06-05T02:45:10.342659-07:00","date_modified":"2024-06-05T02:45:10.342680-07:00","name":"Abhishek Maheshwari","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/13358577/","id":13358577,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600410/","attorney_id":9600410,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600410/","attorney_id":9600410,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600411/","attorney_id":9600411,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600412/","attorney_id":9600412,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"name":"Defendant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2024-02-12T18:52:18.056166-08:00","date_modified":"2024-02-12T18:52:18.056175-08:00","name":"Shenif Visram","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/13358576/","id":13358576,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600410/","attorney_id":9600410,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600410/","attorney_id":9600410,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600411/","attorney_id":9600411,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600412/","attorney_id":9600412,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"name":"Defendant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2024-02-12T18:52:18.046075-08:00","date_modified":"2024-02-12T18:52:18.046082-08:00","name":"Jaime Leverton","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/13358575/","id":13358575,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600410/","attorney_id":9600410,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600410/","attorney_id":9600410,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600411/","attorney_id":9600411,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9600412/","attorney_id":9600412,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"name":"Defendant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2024-02-12T18:52:18.033578-08:00","date_modified":"2024-02-12T18:52:18.033587-08:00","name":"Hut 8 Corp.","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/13358574/","id":13358574,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8980055/","attorney_id":8980055,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","docket_id":68232570,"name":"Plaintiff","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2024-02-12T18:52:17.989605-08:00","date_modified":"2024-02-12T18:52:17.989615-08:00","name":"Ryan Mayiras","extra_info":""}],"entries":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/470785702/","id":470785702,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/486173610/","id":486173610,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/68232570/82/in-re-hut-8-corp-securities-litigation/","date_created":"2026-07-14T11:12:14.964627-07:00","date_modified":"2026-09-01T18:19:25.911972-07:00","sha1":"9bc92b82d8d9df487d27341b131e6483b8a646f3","page_count":1,"file_size":143330,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.615242/gov.uscourts.nysd.615242.82.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.nysd.615242/gov.uscourts.nysd.615242.82.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"Case 1:24-cv-00904-VM Document 82 Filed 07/13/26 Page 1 of 1\n\n\n 7/13/26\nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK\n\n\nIN RE HUT 8 CORP. SECURITIES\nLITIGATION\n\n 24 Civ. 904 (VM)\nTHIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO ALL ACTIONS\n ORDER\n\n\nVICTOR MARRERO, United States District Judge.\n\n The Court\u2019s Order granting the unopposed motion for\n\npreliminary approval of the class action settlement (Dkt. No.\n\n80) contained a mistake as to the time of the Settlement\n\nHearing. The Settlement Hearing, to be held before the Court\n\npursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e), is hereby\n\nscheduled for November 6, 2026, at 1:00 p.m.\n\n\n\nSO ORDERED.\n\nDated: 13 July 2026\n New York, New York\n\n _________________________\n Victor Marrero\n U.S.D.J.\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2026-08-27T05:27:46.663513-07:00","document_number":"82","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"127039968805","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":true,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order AND ~Util - Set Hearings","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-07-14T11:12:14.924681-07:00","date_modified":"2026-09-01T18:19:25.898020-07:00","date_filed":"2026-07-13","time_filed":"12:31:13","entry_number":82,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-07-14.001","pacer_sequence_number":302,"description":" ORDER: The Court's Order granting the unopposed motion for preliminary approval of the class action settlement (Dkt. No. 80) contained a mistake as to the time of the Settlement Hearing. The Settlement Hearing, to be held before the Court pursu ant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e), is hereby scheduled for November 6, 2026, at 1:00 p.m. SO ORDERED. (Settlement Conference set for 11/6/2026 at 01:00 PM before Judge Victor Marrero.) (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 7/13/2026) (jca)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/470661588/","id":470661588,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/486044873/","id":486044873,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/68232570/81/in-re-hut-8-corp-securities-litigation/","date_created":"2026-07-13T13:15:21.292236-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-13T13:15:21.313733-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"81","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"127039961008","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Notice of Appearance","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-07-13T13:15:21.246114-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-13T13:15:21.254234-07:00","date_filed":"2026-07-13","time_filed":"14:12:46","entry_number":81,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-07-13.001","pacer_sequence_number":299,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/470170057/","id":470170057,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/485534061/","id":485534061,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/68232570/80/in-re-hut-8-corp-securities-litigation/","date_created":"2026-07-08T15:11:35.068046-07:00","date_modified":"2026-08-21T21:30:35.795303-07:00","sha1":"06bae1f1c14199a1c12c04404bac7e7de2074800","page_count":17,"file_size":752831,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.615242/gov.uscourts.nysd.615242.80.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.nysd.615242/gov.uscourts.nysd.615242.80.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":" Case 1:24-cv-01636-VM Document 10 Filed 07/08/26 Page 1 of 17\n\n\n 7/8/26\nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK\n\n IN RE HUT 8 CORP. SECURITIES Case No. 1:24-cv-00904-VM\n LITIGATION\n CLASS ACTION\n\n THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:\n\n ALL ACTIONS\n\n\n ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION\n SETTLEMENT, APPROVING FORM AND MANNER OF NOTICE, AND SETTING\n DATE FOR HEARING ON FINAL APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT\n\n WHEREAS:\n\n A. On June 18, 2026, Lead Plaintiff Abhishek Maheshwari (\n\nhimself and all other members of the Settlement Class (defined below) and Defendants Hut 8 Corp.\n\n Hut 8 and Asher Genoot, Michael Ho, Jaime Leverton, and Shenif Visram (together, the\n\n\n\n and Agreement\n\nabove-\n\nRules of Civil Procedure, and which, together with the exhibits thereto, sets forth the terms and\n\nconditions of the proposed settlement of the Action\n\nthe Defendants and Released Defendant Parties on the merits and with prejudice (the\n\n\n\n B. The Court has reviewed and considered the Stipulation and the accompanying\n\nexhibits;\n\n C. The Parties to the Stipulation have consented to the entry of this order; and\n\n\n\n\n 1\n\f Case 1:24-cv-01636-VM Document 10 Filed 07/08/26 Page 2 of 17\n\n\n\n\n D. All capitalized terms used in this order that are not otherwise defined herein have\n\nthe meanings defined in the Stipulation.\n\n NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, this 8th day of July,\n\n2026, that:\n\n 1. The Court has reviewed the Stipulation, preliminarily approves the Settlement, and\n\nfinds, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e)(1), that the Court will likely be able to\n\nfinally approve the proposed Settlement as fair, reasonable, and adequate to the Settlement Class\n\nunder Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e)(2), subject to further consideration at the Settlement\n\nHearing described below.\n\n 2. Pursuant to Rule 23(a) and (b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court\n\npreliminarily certifies, for purposes of the Settlement only, the Settlement Class of: all persons and\n\nentities that purchased or otherwise acquired Hut 8 securities in the United States or on an\n\nexchange based in the United States between February 13, 2023 and January 18, 2024, inclusive,\n\nand who were allegedly damaged thereby. Excluded from the Settlement Class are Defendants, the\n\nofficers and directors of Hut 8 at all relevant times, members of their Immediate Family and their\n\nlegal representatives, heirs, successors, or assigns, and any entity in which Defendants have or had\n\na controlling interest. Also excluded from the Settlement Class are any persons or entities who or\n\nwhich timely and validly exclude themselves from the Settlement Class.\n\n 3. Solely for the purposes of effectuating the proposed Settlement of this Action, the\n\nCourt finds and preliminarily concludes that the prerequisites of class action certification under\n\nRules 23(a) and 23(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure have been satisfied for the\n\nSettlement Class defined herein and for the purposes of the Settlement only, in that:\n\n\n\n\n 2\n\f Case 1:24-cv-01636-VM Document 10 Filed 07/08/26 Page 3 of 17\n\n\n\n\n (a) the members of the Settlement Class are so numerous that joinder of all\n\nSettlement Class Members is impracticable;\n\n (b) there are questions of law and fact common to the Settlement Class\n\nMembers;\n\n (c)\n\n (d) Plaintiff and Lead Counsel have fairly and adequately represented and\n\nprotected, and will fairly and adequately represent and protect, the interests of the Settlement\n\nClass;\n\n (e) the questions of law and fact common to Settlement Class Members\n\npredominate over any individual questions; and\n\n (f) a class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient\n\nadjudication of the controversy.\n\n 4. Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and for purposes of\n\nthe Settlement only, Plaintiff is preliminarily certified as Class Representative for the Settlement\n\nClass. The law firm of Pomerantz LLP is preliminarily appointed Class Counsel for the Settlement\n\nClass.\n\n 5. -length\n\nnegotiations overseen by an experienced mediator and (b) the Stipulation is sufficiently fair,\n\nreasonable, and adequate to the Settlement Class to warrant providing notice of the Settlement to\n\nSettlement Class Members and holding the Settlement Hearing.\n\n 6. The Settlement Hearing, to be held before the Court pursuant to Rule 23(e) of the\n\nFederal Rules of Civil Procedure,\n\ndiscretion, at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York,\n\n\n\n\n 3\n\f Case 1:24-cv-01636-VM Document 10 Filed 07/08/26 Page 4 of 17\n\n\n\n\nNY 10007, in Courtroom 15B, on November 6, 2026, at 11:00 p.m. [a date at least 100 days\n\nfrom entry of this order] for the following purposes:\n\n (a) to determine whether the proposed Settlement is fair, reasonable, and\n\nadequate, and should be finally approved by the Court;\n\n (b)\n\nas provided under the Stipulation should be entered, and to determine whether the release by the\n\n hould be\n\nprovided to the Released Defendant Parties;\n\n (c) to determine, for purposes of the Settlement only, whether the Settlement\n\nClass should be finally certified; whether Plaintiff should be finally certified as Class\n\nRepresentative for the Settlement Class; and whether the law firm of Pomerantz LLP should be\n\nfinally appointed as Class Counsel for the Settlement Class;\n\n (d) to determine whether the proposed Plan of Allocation for the proceeds of\n\nthe Settlement is fair and reasonable and should be approved by the Court;\n\n (e)\n\nLitigation Expenses (which may include an application for an award to Plaintiff for reimbursement\n\nof his reasonable costs and expenses directly related to his representation of the Settlement Class,\n\n\n\n (f) to rule upon such other matters as the Court may deem appropriate.\n\n 7. The Court reserves the right to approve the Settlement with or without modification\n\nand with or without further notice to the Settlement Class. The Court further reserves the right to\n\nenter the Judgment approving the Settlement and dismissing the Action on the merits and with\n\nprejudice,\n\n\n\n\n 4\n\f Case 1:24-cv-01636-VM Document 10 Filed 07/08/26 Page 5 of 17\n\n\n\n\nand/or Litigation Expenses. The Court may also adjourn the Settlement Hearing, decide to hold\n\nthe hearing remotely, or modify any of the dates herein without further individual notice to\n\nmembers of the Settlement Class. Any such changes shall be posted on the website for the\n\nSettlement.\n\n 8. The Court approves the form, substance, and requirements of the Notice of\n\n Litigation\n\n , the Proof of Claim and Release form , the Summary\n\nNotice of Pendency of Class Action, Proposed Settlement,\n\nLitigation , and the Postcard Notice, substantially in the forms\n\nannexed hereto as Exhibits 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, and finds that the mailing and distribution\n\nof the Postcard Notice and publishing of the Notice, Summary Notice, and Claim Form\n\nsubstantially in the manner and form set forth in this Order: (a) constitute the best notice to\n\nSettlement Class Members practicable under the circumstances; (b) are reasonably calculated,\n\nunder the circumstances, to describe the terms and effect of the Settlement and to apprise\n\nSettlement Class Members of their right to object to the proposed Settlement or to exclude\n\nthemselves from the Settlement Class; (c) are reasonable and constitute due, adequate, and\n\nsufficient notice to all Persons entitled to receive such notice; and (d) satisfy all applicable\n\nrequirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (including Rules 23(c) (e)), the Due Process\n\nClause of the United States Constitution, and 15 U.S.C. \u00a7 77z-1(a)(7) and 15 U.S.C. \u00a7 78u-4(a)(7),\n\nas amended by the PSLRA.\n\n 9. The Court approves the retention of and appoints Strategic Claims Services\n\n as the Claims Administrator to supervise and administer the notice procedure as well as\n\nthe processing of claims.\n\n\n\n\n 5\n\f Case 1:24-cv-01636-VM Document 10 Filed 07/08/26 Page 6 of 17\n\n\n\n\n 10. No later than thirty (30) calendar days following the later of (i) entry of this\n\n\n\ninformation necessary to effectuate the payment of the Settlement Amount (e.g., a W-9, wiring\n\ninstructions, contact information for escrow agent to confirm wiring details, details if paying by\n\ncheck, completion of any verification forms reasonably required by the payors), Defendants shall\n\npay or cause the payment of $2,350,000 in cash into an interest-bearing escrow account specified\n\nby Lead Counsel.\n\n 11. At any time after entry of this Order, Lead Counsel may, without further approval\n\nfrom the Court or Defendants, disburse up to two hundred and fifty thousand U.S. dollars and zero\n\ncents ($250,000.00) from the Settlement Fund to pay reasonable and necessary Notice and\n\nAdministration Costs prior to the Effective Date. After the Effective Date, additional amounts may\n\nbe transferred from the Settlement Fund for Lead Counsel to pay additional reasonable and\n\nnecessary Notice and Administration Costs actually incurred and paid or payable without further\n\norder of this Court. Unless otherwise provided, all fees, costs, and expenses incurred in identifying\n\nand notifying Settlement Class Members shall be paid from the Settlement Fund and in no event\n\nshall any of the Released Defendant Parties bear any responsibility, liability or obligation for such\n\nfees, costs, or expenses.\n\n 12. Within five (5) business days of entry of this Order, Hut 8 will, at its own expense,\n\nprovide or cause to be provided to Lead Counsel a list (consisting of names, mailing addresses,\n\nand email addresses, if available) in electronic format, such as Excel, of known, registered\n\nshareholders of record during the Settlement Class Period. Plaintiff and the Claims Administrator\n\nagree to maintain the list or lists provided pursuant to this Paragraph 12 in confidence and use it\n\nonly for the purpose of administering the Settlement.\n\n\n\n\n 6\n\f Case 1:24-cv-01636-VM Document 10 Filed 07/08/26 Page 7 of 17\n\n\n\n\n 13. Within thirty (30) calendar days after entry of this Preliminary Approval Order, the\n\nClaims Administrator shall cause the Postcard Notice, substantially in the form annexed hereto, to\n\nbe mailed, by first-class mail, postage prepaid, to all Settlement Class Members who can be\n\nidentified with reasonable effort .\n\n 14. The Claims Administrator also shall cause the Stipulation and its exhibits, including\n\nthe Preliminary Approval Order, the Notice, and Claim Form, to be posted on a website to be\n\ndeveloped for the Settlement, from which the Notice and Claim Form can be downloaded, within\n\nthirty (30) calendar days after entry of this Preliminary Approval Order.\n\n 15. The Claims Administrator shall use reasonable efforts to give notice to nominee\n\npurchasers such as custodians, brokerage firms, and other Persons and entities that purchased or\n\notherwise acquired Hut 8 securities during the Settlement Class Period for the benefit of another\n\nPerson or entity. Such nominees shall, within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of the notice:\n\n(a) provide a list of the names, addresses, and email addresses (to the extent that email addresses\n\nare available) of all such beneficial owners to the Claims Administrator, and the Claims\n\nAdministrator is ordered to promptly mail the Postcard Notice and/or email the link to the Notice\n\nand Claim Form to such identified beneficial owners; (b) request from the Claims Administrator\n\nthe link to the electronic Notice and Claim Form and, within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of\n\nthe link, email it to all such beneficial owners; or (c) request from the Claims Administrator\n\nsufficient copies of the Postcard Notice to forward to all such beneficial owners and, within seven\n\n(7) calendar days of receipt of those Postcard Notices from the Claims Administrator, forward\n\nthem to all such beneficial owners. Nominees who elect to send the Postcard Notice or the link to\n\nthe Notice and Claim Form to their beneficial owners shall also send a statement to the Claims\n\nAdministrator confirming that the mailing and/or emailing was made as directed. Upon full\n\n\n\n\n 7\n\f Case 1:24-cv-01636-VM Document 10 Filed 07/08/26 Page 8 of 17\n\n\n\n\ncompliance with these directions, nominees may seek reimbursement of their reasonable expenses\n\nactually incurred in providing notice to beneficial owners up to a maximum of $0.02 per name,\n\naddress, and email address provided to the Claims Administrator, up to $0.02 per Postcard Notice\n\nactually mailed plus postage at the pre-sort rate used by the Claims Administrator, or up to $0.02\n\nper link to the electronic Notice and Claim Form transmitted by email, by providing the Claims\n\nAdministrator with proper documentation supporting the expenses for which reimbursement is\n\nsought. Such properly documented expenses incurred by nominees in compliance with the terms\n\nof this Order shall be paid from the Settlement Fund, with any disputes as to the reasonableness or\n\ndocumentation of expenses incurred subject to review by the Court. Nominees are not authorized\n\nto print the Postcard Notice. Postcard Notices may only be printed by the Claims Administrator.\n\n 16. Lead Counsel shall, at least seven (7) calendar days before the Settlement Hearing,\n\nfile with the Court proof, by affidavit or declaration, of mailing of the Postcard Notice and/or\n\nemailing the links to the Notice and Claim Form.\n\n 17. Lead Counsel shall cause the Summary Notice to be published in PR Newswire\n\nwithin fourteen (14) calendar days of the Notice Date. Lead Counsel shall, at or before the\n\nSettlement Hearing, file with the Court proof of publication of the Summary Notice.\n\n 18. In order to be eligible to receive a distribution from the Net Settlement Fund, in the\n\nevent the Settlement is effected in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the\n\nStipulation, each Claimant shall take the following actions and be subject to the following\n\nconditions:\n\n (a) A properly executed Claim Form, substantially in the form annexed hereto\n\nas Exhibit 2, must be submitted to the Claims Administrator, at the address indicated in the Notice,\n\npostmarked no later than 120 days after the Notice Date. Such deadline may be further extended\n\n\n\n\n 8\n\f Case 1:24-cv-01636-VM Document 10 Filed 07/08/26 Page 9 of 17\n\n\n\n\nby Court order or by Lead Counsel in its discretion. Each Claim Form shall be deemed to have\n\nbeen submitted when postmarked (if properly addressed and mailed by first-class or overnight\n\nmail, postage prepaid). Any Claim Form submitted in any other manner shall be deemed to have\n\nbeen submitted when it was actually received at the address designated in the Notice. Any\n\nSettlement Class Member who does not timely submit a Claim Form within the time provided for\n\nshall be barred from sharing in the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, unless otherwise\n\nordered by the Court, but shall remain bound by all determinations and judgments in this Action\n\nconcerning the Settlement, as provided by Paragraph 21 of this order.\n\n (b) The Claim Form submitted by each Claimant must satisfy the following\n\nconditions, unless otherwise allowed pursuant to the Stipulation: (i) it must be properly completed,\n\nsigned, and submitted in a timely manner in accordance with the provisions of the preceding\n\nsubparagraph; (ii) it must be accompanied by adequate supporting documentation for the\n\ntransactions reported therein, in the form of broker confirmation slips, broker account statements,\n\nan authorized statement from the broker containing the transactional information found in a broker\n\nconfirmation slip, or such other documentation as is deemed adequate by the Claims Administrator\n\nand/or Lead Counsel; (iii) if the Person executing the Claim Form is acting in a representative\n\ncapacity, a certification of her current authority to act on behalf of the Claimant must be included\n\nin the Claim Form; and (iv) the Claim Form must be complete and contain no material deletions\n\nor modifications of any of the printed matter contained therein and must be signed under penalty\n\nof perjury. Claimants bear the burden of establishing their right to a recovery from the Net\n\nSettlement Fund.\n\n (c) Once the Claims Administrator has considered a timely submitted Claim\n\nForm, it shall determine whether such Claim is valid, deficient, or rejected. For each Claim\n\n\n\n\n 9\n\f Case 1:24-cv-01636-VM Document 10 Filed 07/08/26 Page 10 of 17\n\n\n\n\ndetermined to be either deficient or rejected, the Claims Administrator shall send a deficiency letter\n\nor rejection letter as appropriate, describing the basis on which the Claim was so determined. Any\n\nPerson who timely submits a Claim Form that is deficient shall be afforded a reasonable time (at\n\nleast ten (10) calendar days) to cure such deficiency if it appears that such deficiency may be cured.\n\nIf any Claimant whose Claim has been rejected in whole or in part (either due to uncurable\n\ndeficiency, a failure to cure a deficiency, or any other stated basis) wishes to contest such rejection,\n\nthe Claimant must, within ten (10) calendar days after the date of mailing of the rejection or partial\n\nrejection notice, serve upon the Claims Administrator a notice and statement of reasons indicating\n\n\n\nrequesting a review thereof by the Court. If an issue concerning a Claim cannot be otherwise\n\nresolved, Lead Counsel shall thereafter present the request for review to the Court.\n\n (d) As part of the Claim Form, each Claimant shall submit to the jurisdiction of\n\nthe Court with respect to the Claim submitted, and shall, upon the Effective Date, release all claims\n\nas provided in the Stipulation.\n\n 19. All Settlement Class Members who do not submit valid and timely Claim Forms\n\nwill be forever barred from receiving any payments from the Net Settlement Fund, except as\n\notherwise ordered by the Court or allowed by Lead Counsel in their discretion, but will in all other\n\nrespects be subject to and bound by the provisions of the Stipulation and Judgment, if entered,\n\nunless they validly exclude themselves from the Settlement Class.\n\n 20. Any Settlement Class Member may enter an appearance in this Action, at his, her,\n\nor its own expense, individually or through counsel of his, her, or its own choice. If any Settlement\n\nClass Member does not enter an appearance, he, she, or it will be represented by Lead Counsel.\n\n\n\n\n 10\n\f Case 1:24-cv-01636-VM Document 10 Filed 07/08/26 Page 11 of 17\n\n\n\n\n 21. Settlement Class Members shall be bound by all orders, determinations, and\n\njudgments in this Action, whether favorable or unfavorable, unless such Persons request exclusion\n\nfrom the Settlement Class in a timely and proper manner, as hereinafter provided. A putative\n\nSettlement Class Member wishing to make such an exclusion request shall mail the request in\n\nwritten form by first-class mail to the address designated in the Notice for such exclusions, such\n\nthat it is received no later than twenty-one (21) calendar days prior to the Settlement Hearing. Such\n\nrequest for exclusion must clearly: (a) indicate the name, address, telephone number, and e-mail\n\ncontact information (if any) of the Person seeking exclusion, (b) state that the sender requests to\n\n In re Hut 8 Corp. Securities Litigation, Case No. 1:24-\n\ncv-00904-VM (S.D.N.Y.), and (c) state the number of shares of Hut 8 common stock the Person\n\nseeking exclusion (i) owned as of the opening of trading on February 13, 2023, (ii) received in\n\n\n\n\nsecurities in connection with the Merger, (iii) purchased, acquired, and/or sold during the\n\nSettlement Class Period, including the number of shares and prices for each transaction, and (iv)\n\nheld as of the close of trading on January 14, 2024. To be valid, such request for exclusion must\n\nbe submitted with documentary proof (i) of each purchase, acquisition, and, if applicable, sale of\n\nHut 8 common stock during the Settlement Class Period, and (ii)\n\nstatus as a beneficial owner of the Hut 8 common stock. Any such request for exclusion must be\n\nsigned and submitted by the beneficial owner under penalty of perjury. The request for exclusion\n\nshall not be effective unless it provides the required information, is legible, and is made within the\n\ntime stated above, or the exclusion is otherwise accepted by the Court. Lead Counsel may contact\n\n\n\n\n 11\n\f Case 1:24-cv-01636-VM Document 10 Filed 07/08/26 Page 12 of 17\n\n\n\n\nany Person filing a request for exclusion, or their attorney if one is designated, to discuss the\n\nexclusion.\n\n 22. The Claims Administrator shall provide all requests for exclusion and supporting\n\ndocumentation submitted therewith (including untimely requests and revocations of requests) to\n\nLead Counsel as soon as possible and no later than the deadline for requesting exclusion or upon\n\nthe receipt thereof (if later than the deadline for requesting exclusion). Lead Counsel shall\n\npromptly (and in any event no later than five (5) calendar days after receiving a request for\n\nexclusion or twenty-one (21) calendar days prior to the Settlement Hearing, whichever is earlier)\n\nprovide\n\nrevocations of requests for exclusion, by email.\n\n 23. All Persons who submit a valid, timely, and unrevoked request for exclusion shall\n\nhave no rights under the Stipulation, shall not share in the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund,\n\nand shall not be bound by the Stipulation or any Final Judgment. Unless otherwise ordered by the\n\nCourt, any Class Member who does not submit a valid and timely written Request for Exclusion\n\nas provided by this paragraph shall be bound by the Stipulation.\n\n 24. Any Settlement Class Member who does not request exclusion from the Settlement\n\nClass may object to the proposed Settlement, the proposed Plan of Allocation, or the Fee and\n\nExpense Application. Any objections must be signed by the objector and clearly and legibly\n\n(a) state the name, address, telephone number, and e-mail address (if any) of the objector; (b) state\n\nthat the objector is objecting to the proposed Settlement, Plan of Allocation, or Fee and Expense\n\nApplication In re Hut 8 Corp. Securities Litigation, Case No. 1:24-cv-00904-VM\n\n(c) state the objection(s) and the specific reasons for each objection, including whether it applies\n\nonly to the objector, to a specific subset of the Settlement Class, or to the entire Settlement Class,\n\n\n\n\n 12\n\f Case 1:24-cv-01636-VM Document 10 Filed 07/08/26 Page 13 of 17\n\n\n\n\nand any legal and evidentiary support, and witnesses the Settlement Class Member wishes to bring\n\n\n\nin the Settlement Class, including the number of shares of Hut 8 common stock that the objector\n\npurchased, acquired, or sold during the Settlement Class Period, as well as the date(s) and price(s)\n\nof each such purchase, acquisition, or sale. Objectors who are represented by counsel must also\n\nprovide the name, address, and telephone number of all counsel, if any, who represent them,\n\nincluding their former or current counsel who may be entitled to compensation in connection with\n\nthe objection; the number of times the objector and their counsel have filed an objection to a class\n\naction settlement in the last five years; the nature of each such objection in each case; and the name\n\nand docket number of each case.\n\n 25.\n\nSettlement, the Plan of Allocation, or the Fee and Expense Application only if such Settlement\n\nClass Member has served on the following counsel, by hand or by mail, his, her, or its written\n\nobjection and supporting papers, such that they are received on or before twenty-one (21) calendar\n\ndays before the Settlement Hearing:\n\nLead Counsel:\nJeremy A. Lieberman\nMurielle J. Steven Walsh\nPOMERANTZ LLP\n600 Third Avenue, 20th Floor\nNew York, NY 10016\n\nCounsel for Defendants:\nLissa M. Percopo\nGIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP\n1700 M Street N.W.\nWashington, D.C. 20036-4504\n\nand has filed, either by mail or in person, at least twenty-one (21) calendar days prior to the\n\nSettlement Hearing, said objections and supporting papers with the Clerk of the Court, United\n\n\n\n 13\n\f Case 1:24-cv-01636-VM Document 10 Filed 07/08/26 Page 14 of 17\n\n\n\n\nStates District Court for the Southern District of New York, Daniel Patrick Moynihan United\n\nStates Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007.\n\n 26. Any Settlement Class Member who does not object in the manner prescribed above\n\nshall be deemed to have waived such objection and shall forever be foreclosed from making any\n\nobjection to any aspect of the Settlement, to the Plan of Allocation, or to the Fee and Expense\n\nApplication, unless otherwise ordered by the Court, and shall otherwise be bound by the Judgment\n\nto be entered and the releases to be given.\n\n 27. Settlement Class Members do not need to appear at the hearing or take any other\n\naction to indicate their approval. However, Persons wishing to be heard orally in opposition to the\n\napproval of the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, and/or the Fee and Expense Application are\n\nrequired to indicate in their written objection their intention to appear at the hearing. Further,\n\nPersons who intend to object to the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, and/or the Fee and Expense\n\nApplication and desire to present evidence at the Settlement Hearing must include in their written\n\nobjections the identity of any witnesses they may call to testify and exhibits they intend to\n\nintroduce into evidence at the Settlement Hearing.\n\n 28. Until otherwise ordered by the Court, the Court stays all proceedings in the Action,\n\nother than proceedings necessary to carry out or enforce the terms and conditions of the Settlement.\n\nPending final determination of whether the Settlement should be approved, Plaintiff, each and\n\nevery Settlement Class Member, and anyone who acts or purports to act on their behalf, shall not\n\ninstitute, commence, or prosecute any action or proceeding in any court or tribunal which asserts\n\n he Released Defendant Parties.\n\n 29. Fee\n\nand Expense Application shall be filed with the Court and served on or before thirty-five (35)\n\n\n\n\n 14\n\f Case 1:24-cv-01636-VM Document 10 Filed 07/08/26 Page 15 of 17\n\n\n\n\ncalendar days prior to the date set herein for the Settlement Hearing. Any submissions filed in\n\nresponse to any objections or in further support of the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, and/or\n\nthe Fee and Expense Application shall be filed no later than seven (7) calendar days prior to the\n\nSettlement Hearing.\n\n 30. No Person who is not a Settlement Class Member or Lead Counsel shall have any\n\nright to any portion of, or to any distribution of, the Net Settlement Fund unless otherwise ordered\n\nby the Court or otherwise provided in the Stipulation.\n\n 31. All funds held in escrow shall be deemed and considered to be in custodia legis of\n\nthe Court, and shall remain subject to the jurisdiction of the Court, until such time as such funds\n\nshall be disbursed pursuant to the Stipulation and/or further order of the Court.\n\n 32. Neither Defendants, their counsel, nor any of the Released Defendant Parties shall\n\n\n\nLitigation Expenses submitted by Lead Counsel or Plaintiff, and such matters will be considered\n\nseparately from the fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy of the Settlement. Any order or\n\n Litigation\n\nExpenses, or any appeal from any order relating thereto or reversal or modification thereof, shall\n\nnot operate to terminate or cancel the Stipulation, or affect or delay the finality of the Judgment\n\napproving the Stipulation and the settlement of the Action.\n\n 33. If the Settlement is terminated as provided in the Stipulation, the Settlement is not\n\napproved or consummated for any reason whatsoever, or the Effective Date of the Settlement\n\notherwise fails to occur, then both the Stipulation (as well as any amendments thereto), except as\n\notherwise provided therein, this Preliminary Approval Order, and all proceedings had in\n\nconnection therewith shall be null and void, of no further force or effect, and without prejudice to\n\n\n\n\n 15\n\f Case 1:24-cv-01636-VM Document 10 Filed 07/08/26 Page 16 of 17\n\n\n\n\nany Party, and may not be introduced as evidence or used in any actions or proceedings by any\n\nPerson or entity against the Parties for any purpose. In any such event, the Parties shall not forfeit\n\nor waive any factual or legal defense or contention in the Action and the Parties shall be deemed\n\nto have reverted to their respective litigation positions in the Action as of May 27, 2026.\n\n 34. This Order, the term sheet entered into by and between the Parties on May 27, 2026,\n\nthe Stipulation (whether or not finally approved or consummated), in addition to the negotiations\n\nof these items and any proceedings taken pursuant to them, do not constitute and shall not be:\n\n (a) offered against or received against or to the prejudice of any of the Released\n\nDefendant Parties as evidence of, or construed as, or deemed to be evidence of any presumption,\n\nconcession, or admission by any of the Released Defendant Parties with respect to the truth of any\n\nallegation by Plaintiff or the Settlement Class, or the validity of any claim that has been or could\n\nhave been asserted in the Action or in any litigation, including, but not limited to, the Released\n\n or of any liability, damages, negligence, fault, or wrongdoing of any of the\n\nReleased Defendant Parties or any Person or entity whatsoever, or of any infirmity in any of\n\n ;\n\n (b) offered or received against or to the prejudice of any of the Released\n\nDefendants Parties as evidence of a presumption, concession, or admission of any fault,\n\nmisrepresentation, or omission with respect to any statement or written document approved or\n\nmade by any of the Released Defendants Parties, or against or to the prejudice of Plaintiff, or any\n\nSettlement Class Member as evidence of any infirmity in the claims of Plaintiff or the Settlement\n\nClass Members;\n\n (c) offered or received against or to the prejudice of any of the Released\n\nDefendant Parties, Plaintiff, any Settlement Class Member, or their respective counsel, as evidence\n\n\n\n\n 16\n\f Case 1:24-cv-01636-VM Document 10 Filed 07/08/26 Page 17 of 17\n\n\n\n\nof a presumption, concession, or admission with respect to any liability, damages, negligence,\n\nfault, infirmity, or wrongdoing, or in any way referred to for any other reason against or to the\n\nprejudice of any of the Released Defendant Parties, Plaintiff, Settlement Class Members, or their\n\nrespective counsel, in any other civil, criminal, or administrative action or proceeding, other than\n\nsuch proceedings as may be necessary to effectuate the provisions of this Stipulation;\n\n (d) construed against any of the Released Defendant Parties, Plaintiff, or any\n\nSettlement Class Member, as an admission or concession that the consideration to be given\n\nhereunder represents the amount that could be or would have been recovered after trial; and\n\n (e) construed as or received in evidence as an admission, concession, or\n\npresumption against Plaintiff or any Settlement Class Member that any of their claims are without\n\nmerit or infirm or that damages recoverable in the Action would not have exceeded the Settlement\n\nAmount.\n\n 35. The entered during this Action relating to the confidentiality of\n\ninformation shall survive this Settlement.\n\n 36. The Court retains exclusive jurisdiction over the Action to consider all further\n\nmatters arising out of or connected with the Settlement.\n\n\n\nDATED this 8th day of July, 2026.\nNew York, New York\n\n ____________________________________\n HONORABLE VICTOR MARRERO\n UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE\n\n\n\n\n 17\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2026-08-06T09:30:46.458710-07:00","document_number":"80","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"127039937901","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order on Motion for Settlement","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-07-08T15:11:34.987229-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-08T15:11:35.006534-07:00","date_filed":"2026-07-08","time_filed":"17:08:01","entry_number":80,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-07-08.001","pacer_sequence_number":297,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/470141000/","id":470141000,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/485503731/","id":485503731,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/68232570/79/in-re-hut-8-corp-securities-litigation/","date_created":"2026-07-08T13:09:09.539723-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-08T13:09:09.553178-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"79","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"127039936540","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Notice (Other)","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-07-08T13:09:09.499860-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-08T13:09:09.507032-07:00","date_filed":"2026-07-08","time_filed":"15:47:40","entry_number":79,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-07-08.001","pacer_sequence_number":295,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/470000029/","id":470000029,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/485356977/","id":485356977,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/68232570/78/in-re-hut-8-corp-securities-litigation/","date_created":"2026-07-07T13:11:51.253917-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-07T13:11:51.259109-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"78","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"127039927781","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Declaration (non-motion)","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-07-07T13:11:51.232563-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-07T13:11:51.237442-07:00","date_filed":"2026-07-07","time_filed":"14:21:27","entry_number":78,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-07-07.001","pacer_sequence_number":293,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/469642856/","id":469642856,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/484988775/","id":484988775,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/68232570/77/in-re-hut-8-corp-securities-litigation/","date_created":"2026-07-02T15:07:52.076713-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-02T15:07:52.085951-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"77","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"127039912582","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-07-02T15:07:52.034905-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-02T15:07:52.044692-07:00","date_filed":"2026-07-02","time_filed":"17:52:03","entry_number":77,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-07-02.001","pacer_sequence_number":291,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/469434827/","id":469434827,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/484773076/","id":484773076,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/68232570/76/in-re-hut-8-corp-securities-litigation/","date_created":"2026-07-01T11:08:34.701800-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-01T11:08:34.715685-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"76","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"127039899150","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Withdraw as Attorney","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-07-01T11:08:34.665262-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-01T11:08:34.673800-07:00","date_filed":"2026-07-01","time_filed":"13:32:18","entry_number":76,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-07-01.001","pacer_sequence_number":289,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/468286034/","id":468286034,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/483574667/","id":483574667,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/68232570/73/in-re-hut-8-corp-securities-litigation/","date_created":"2026-06-22T11:08:26.460414-07:00","date_modified":"2026-06-22T11:08:26.467754-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"73","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"127039834801","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Settlement","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-06-22T11:08:26.430885-07:00","date_modified":"2026-06-22T11:08:26.439771-07:00","date_filed":"2026-06-22","time_filed":"12:35:07","entry_number":73,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-06-22.001","pacer_sequence_number":281,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/468286023/","id":468286023,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/483574656/","id":483574656,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/68232570/74/in-re-hut-8-corp-securities-litigation/","date_created":"2026-06-22T11:08:23.907408-07:00","date_modified":"2026-06-22T11:08:23.915470-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"74","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"127039834840","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-06-22T11:08:23.875974-07:00","date_modified":"2026-06-22T11:08:23.885714-07:00","date_filed":"2026-06-22","time_filed":"12:38:25","entry_number":74,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-06-22.001","pacer_sequence_number":283,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/468285934/","id":468285934,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/483574566/","id":483574566,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/68232570/75/in-re-hut-8-corp-securities-litigation/","date_created":"2026-06-22T11:08:06.161060-07:00","date_modified":"2026-06-22T11:08:06.170560-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"75","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"127039835169","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Declaration in Support of Motion","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-06-22T11:08:06.106639-07:00","date_modified":"2026-06-22T11:08:06.123124-07:00","date_filed":"2026-06-22","time_filed":"12:58:39","entry_number":75,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-06-22.001","pacer_sequence_number":286,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/465697571/","id":465697571,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/480907763/","id":480907763,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/68232570/72/in-re-hut-8-corp-securities-litigation/","date_created":"2026-05-29T14:11:41.837173-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-11T01:12:23.306093-07:00","sha1":"a0762c1f1b6aa9c3413bbe253432ad722a272f77","page_count":1,"file_size":150569,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.615242/gov.uscourts.nysd.615242.72.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.nysd.615242/gov.uscourts.nysd.615242.72.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"Case 1:24-cv-00904-VM Document 72 Filed 05/29/26 Page 1 of 1\n\n\n 5/29/26\nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK\n\n\nIN RE HUT 8 CORP. SECURITIES\nLITIGATION\n\n 24 Civ. 904 (VM)\nTHIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO ALL ACTIONS\n ORDER\n\n\nVICTOR MARRERO, United States District Judge.\n\n The request for a stay (Dkt. No. 71) is granted. All\n\ndeadlines and proceedings in this matter are hereby stayed\n\npending settlement.\n\n\n\nSO ORDERED.\n\nDated: 29 May 2026\n New York, New York\n\n _________________________\n Victor Marrero\n U.S.D.J.\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2026-07-08T23:24:15.483823-07:00","document_number":"72","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"127039702582","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":true,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order on Motion to Stay","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-05-29T14:11:41.791801-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-08T23:24:13.610855-07:00","date_filed":"2026-05-29","time_filed":"15:14:55","entry_number":72,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-05-29.001","pacer_sequence_number":279,"description":" ORDER granting 71 Letter Motion to Stay. The request for a stay (Dkt. No. 71) is granted. All deadlines and proceedings in this matter are hereby stayed pending settlement. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 5/29/2026) (jca)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/465505471/","id":465505471,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/480711223/","id":480711223,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/68232570/71/in-re-hut-8-corp-securities-litigation/","date_created":"2026-05-28T12:11:37.665059-07:00","date_modified":"2026-06-09T05:42:30.566622-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"71","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"127039692147","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Stay","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-05-28T12:11:37.631644-07:00","date_modified":"2026-06-09T05:42:30.526335-07:00","date_filed":"2026-05-28","time_filed":"13:11:56","entry_number":71,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-05-28.001","pacer_sequence_number":277,"description":"LETTER MOTION to Stay - Joint Letter Notice of Settlement addressed to Judge Victor Marrero from Murielle J. Steven Walsh and Monica K. Loseman dated May 28, 2026. Document filed by Abhishek Maheshwari..(Steven, Murielle) (Entered: 05/28/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/460894141/","id":460894141,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/475971077/","id":475971077,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/68232570/70/in-re-hut-8-corp-securities-litigation/","date_created":"2026-04-15T14:11:37.955170-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-10T20:25:30.434076-07:00","sha1":"564d1fa9cc4134d3d85bd4af4e1899cec0c43f1d","page_count":1,"file_size":226693,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.615242/gov.uscourts.nysd.615242.70.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.nysd.615242/gov.uscourts.nysd.615242.70.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":" Case 1:24-cv-00904-VM Document 70 Filed 04/15/26 Page 1 of 1\n\n Monica K. Loseman\n Partner\n T: +1 303.298.5784\n M: +1 303.408.1847\n mloseman@gibsondunn.com\n\nApril 14, 2026\n\n\nVia ECF 4/15/26\n\nThe Honorable Victor Marrero\nUnited States District Court for the Southern District of New York\nDaniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse\n500 Pearl Street\nNew York, New York 10017\n\nRe: In re Hut 8 Securities Litigation, Case No. 1:24-cv-904-VM (S.D.N.Y)\n Joint Letter Motion to Extend Stay Pending Mediation\n\nDear Judge Marrero:\n\n We are counsel for Hut 8 Corp. (\u201cHut 8\u201d), Asher Genoot, Michael Ho, Jaime Leverton, and\nShenif Visram (collectively, the \u201cIndividual Defendants,\u201d and together with Hut 8, the\n\u201cDefendants\u201d), and Lead Plaintiff Abishek Maheshwari (together, with Defendants, the \u201cParties\u201d)\nin the above-captioned matter. Pursuant to Rule I.A. of Your Honor\u2019s Individual Practices, the\nParties jointly write to request an extension to the temporary stay of proceedings pending\nscheduled mediation.\n\n On February 2, 2026, the Parties filed their first joint letter motion to stay all proceedings\nthrough April 15, 2026 pending mediation (Dkt. 67), which Your Honor granted on February 4,\n2026 (Dkt. 68). The Parties were originally scheduled to attend mediation on March 30, 2026.\nHowever, due to a scheduling conflict that arose, the Parties had to reschedule the mediation for\nMay 7, 2026, the earliest date on which the mediator and all relevant parties are available. The\nParties believe an extension of the stay of proceedings is appropriate in order to conserve judicial\nresources and to allow the Parties to meaningfully engage in settlement discussions. Accordingly,\nthe Parties respectfully request that the Court extend the temporary stay of all proceedings\nthrough May 22, 2026.\n\n The Parties thank the Court for its attention to this matter.\n\n Sincerely,\n\n\n\nGIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP POMERANTZ LLP\n\n/s/ Monica K. Loseman /s/ Murielle J. Steven Walsh*\n *with consent to file\n\n\n\ncc: All Counsel of Record (via ECF) The parties' request for an extension of the\n temporary stay is granted. The stay of all\n proceedings in this matter is hereby\n extended until May 22, 2026.\n\n\n\n 4/15/26\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2026-07-08T17:46:53.254557-07:00","document_number":"70","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"127039430854","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":true,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order on Motion to Stay","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-04-15T14:11:37.929839-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-08T17:46:39.879590-07:00","date_filed":"2026-04-15","time_filed":"16:18:27","entry_number":70,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-04-15.001","pacer_sequence_number":275,"description":" ORDER granting 69 Letter Motion to Stay. Request GRANTED. The parties' request for an extension of the temporary stay is granted. The stay of all proceedings in this matter is hereby extended until May 22, 2026. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 4/15/2026) (jca)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/460785507/","id":460785507,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/475855531/","id":475855531,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/68232570/69/in-re-hut-8-corp-securities-litigation/","date_created":"2026-04-14T16:08:17.583264-07:00","date_modified":"2026-06-09T05:42:30.450600-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"69","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"127039423501","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Stay","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-04-14T16:08:17.547594-07:00","date_modified":"2026-06-09T05:42:30.430789-07:00","date_filed":"2026-04-14","time_filed":"17:37:20","entry_number":69,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-04-14.001","pacer_sequence_number":273,"description":"JOINT LETTER MOTION to Stay / Extension of Stay of All Proceedings addressed to Judge Victor Marrero from Monica K. Loseman dated April 14, 2026. Document filed by Asher Genoot, Michael Ho, Hut 8 Corp., Jaime Leverton, Shenif Visram..(Loseman, Monica) (Entered: 04/14/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/452663370/","id":452663370,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/467536286/","id":467536286,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/68232570/68/in-re-hut-8-corp-securities-litigation/","date_created":"2026-02-04T09:07:23.122746-08:00","date_modified":"2026-07-07T18:11:34.612093-07:00","sha1":"4b4c8f1e0c563f835169b563ef1992de516717be","page_count":1,"file_size":265254,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.615242/gov.uscourts.nysd.615242.68.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.nysd.615242/gov.uscourts.nysd.615242.68.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":" Case 1:24-cv-00904-VM Document 68 Filed 02/04/26 Page 1 of 1\n\n Monica K. Loseman\n Partner\n T: +1 303.298.5784\n M: +1 303.408.1847\n mloseman@gibsondunn.com\n\nFebruary 2, 2026\n\n\nVia ECF\n 2/4/2026\nThe Honorable Victor Marrero\nUnited States District Court for the Southern District of New York\nDaniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse\n500 Pearl Street\nNew York, New York 10017\n\nRe: In re Hut 8 Securities Litigation, Case No. 1:24-cv-904-VM (S.D.N.Y)\n Joint Letter Motion to Stay Pending Mediation\n\nDear Judge Marrero:\n\n We are counsel for Hut 8 Corp. (\u0093Hut 8\u0094), Asher Genoot, Michael Ho, Jaime Leverton, and\nShenif Visram (collectively, the \u0093Individual Defendants,\u0094 and together with Hut 8, the\n\u0093Defendants\u0094), the Defendants (together with Lead Plaintiff Abishek Maheshwari, the \u0093Parties\u0094) in\nthe above-captioned matter. Pursuant to Rule I.A. of Your Honor\u0092s Individual Practices, the\nParties jointly write to request a temporary stay of proceedings pending scheduled mediation. As\nstated in the December 5, 2025 Amended Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order (Dkt.\n66) (the \u0093Scheduling Order\u0094), the Parties agreed to participate in mediation and to seek a\ntemporary stay of proceedings pending mediation.\n\n Since filing the Scheduling Order, the Parties have coordinated to select a mediator and to\nschedule the mediation for the first date all relevant parties are available, March 30, 2026. The\nParties believe a stay of proceedings to determine if that mediation can be successful is\nappropriate in order to conserve judicial resources and to allow the Parties to meaningfully engage\nin settlement discussions. Accordingly, the Parties respectfully request a temporary stay of all\nproceedings through April 15, 2026.\n\n The Parties thank the Court for its attention to this matter.\n\nSincerely,\n\n\n\nGIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP POMERANTZ LLP\n\n\n\nMonica K. Loseman Murielle J. Steven Walsh*\n *with consent to file\n\n\n The parties' request for a temporary stay is\ncc: All Counsel of Record (via ECF) hereby granted. All proceedings in this\n matter are hereby stayed until April 15,\n 2026, to assist in mediation and settlement.\n\n\n\n 2/4/2026\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2026-07-06T03:38:17.487519-07:00","document_number":"68","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"127039009535","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":true,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order on Motion to Stay","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-02-04T09:07:23.097923-08:00","date_modified":"2026-07-06T03:38:12.877874-07:00","date_filed":"2026-02-04","time_filed":"11:47:29","entry_number":68,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-02-04.001","pacer_sequence_number":271,"description":" ORDER granting 67 CONSENT LETTER MOTION to Stay Proceedings. Request GRANTED. The parties' request for a temporary stay is hereby granted. All proceedings in this matter are hereby stayed until April 15, 2026, to assist in mediation and settlement. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 2/4/2026) (jca)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/452449869/","id":452449869,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/467317970/","id":467317970,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/68232570/67/in-re-hut-8-corp-securities-litigation/","date_created":"2026-02-02T15:15:55.742783-08:00","date_modified":"2026-06-09T05:42:30.345951-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"67","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"127038998434","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Stay","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-02-02T15:15:55.696812-08:00","date_modified":"2026-06-09T05:42:30.324696-07:00","date_filed":"2026-02-02","time_filed":"18:03:29","entry_number":67,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-02-02.001","pacer_sequence_number":264,"description":"CONSENT LETTER MOTION to Stay Proceedings addressed to Judge Victor Marrero from Monica K. Loseman dated February 2, 2026. Document filed by Asher Genoot, Michael Ho, Hut 8 Corp., Jaime Leverton, Shenif Visram..(Loseman, Monica) (Entered: 02/02/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/446491895/","id":446491895,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/461218030/","id":461218030,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/68232570/66/in-re-hut-8-corp-securities-litigation/","date_created":"2025-12-08T11:09:22.718861-08:00","date_modified":"2026-06-09T05:42:30.301934-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"66","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"127038688944","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Case Management Plan","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2025-12-08T11:09:22.683646-08:00","date_modified":"2026-06-09T05:42:30.276108-07:00","date_filed":"2025-12-05","time_filed":null,"entry_number":66,"recap_sequence_number":"2025-12-05.001","pacer_sequence_number":262,"description":"AMENDED CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER: This case is to be tried to a jury. The parties have agreed to participate in mediation and to seek a sixty (60) day stay of proceedings to allow for meaningful engagement in settlement negotiations (the \"temporary stay\"). All fact discovery is to be completed within one hundred twenty (120) days after the end of the temporary stay. All expert discovery (ordinarily conducted following the completion of fact discovery) including parties' expert reports and depositions, witness lists, and identification of documents pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2), (3), and 35(b), is to be completed within 110 days of the completion of fact discovery, in accordance with the following schedule: a. Initial expert reports on which a party bears the burden of proof will be due 45 days after the close of fact discovery; b. Rebuttal reports will be due 45 days after the initial reports; c. Expert depositions will occur within 30 days after the rebuttal reports are served. Contemplated motions: a. Plaintiff: Motion for Class Certification, Appointment of Class Representative and Appointment of Class Counsel, with the following schedule: i. Motion for Class Certification due: 30 days after the close of fact discovery. ii. Opposition to Class Certification due: 30 days after Motion for Class Certification; and iii. Reply in support of Class Certification due: 15 days after Opposition to Class Certification. Defendants: Motion for judgment on the pleadings, with the following schedule: 1. Pre-Motion Letter due: 14 days from the end of the temporary stay. 2. Response due: 14 days from the Pre-Motion Letter 3. Letter to the Court due: 7 days from the Response. 4. Opening Briefs due: 30 days after Court's order permitting full briefing. 5. Opposition briefs due: 30 days after Opening Brief. 6. Reply briefs due: 30 days after Opposition Brief. Motion to clarify status of Mr. Visram, with the following schedule: 1. Pre-Motion Letter due: 30 days from the end of the temporary stay. 2. Response due: 28 days from the Pre-Motion Letter 3. Letter to the Court due: 14 days from the Response. 4. Opening Briefs due: 45 days after Court's order permitting full briefing. 5. Opposition briefs due: 45 days after Opening Brief. 6. Reply briefs due: 30 days after Opposition Brief. The next Case Management Conference will be scheduled as necessary. (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 12/5/2025) (rro) (Entered: 12/08/2025)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/446227275/","id":446227275,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/460944759/","id":460944759,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/68232570/65/in-re-hut-8-corp-securities-litigation/","date_created":"2025-12-04T17:09:39.284352-08:00","date_modified":"2026-06-09T05:42:30.250855-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"65","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"127038675182","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Proposed Case Management Plan","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2025-12-04T17:09:39.119421-08:00","date_modified":"2026-06-09T05:42:30.230325-07:00","date_filed":"2025-12-04","time_filed":"18:48:12","entry_number":65,"recap_sequence_number":"2025-12-04.001","pacer_sequence_number":260,"description":"PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN. Document filed by Hut 8 Corp., Jaime Leverton, Shenif Visram..(Loseman, Monica) (Entered: 12/04/2025)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/446041694/","id":446041694,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/460755003/","id":460755003,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/68232570/64/in-re-hut-8-corp-securities-litigation/","date_created":"2025-12-03T14:05:10.786997-08:00","date_modified":"2026-07-04T10:37:43.450028-07:00","sha1":"7f5269c052e2416786334a6378612d7b75cfb183","page_count":1,"file_size":151236,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.615242/gov.uscourts.nysd.615242.64.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.nysd.615242/gov.uscourts.nysd.615242.64.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"Case 1:24-cv-00904-VM Document 64 Filed 12/03/25 Page 1 of 1\n\n\n 12/3/25\nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK\n\n\nIN RE HUT 8 CORP. SECURITIES\nLITIGATION\n\n 24 Civ. 904 (VM)\nTHIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO ALL ACTIONS\n ORDER\n\n\nVICTOR MARRERO, United States District Judge.\n\n The Court is in receipt of the parties\u2019 joint status\n\nletter and proposed Case Management plan. (See Dkt. No. 63.)\n\nThe parties are hereby directed to submit an amended proposed\n\nCase Management Plan providing that no further joinder of\n\nadditional parties or filing of amended pleadings can be made\n\nwithout leave of court.\n\n\n\nSO ORDERED.\n\nDated: 3 December 2025\n New York, New York\n\n _________________________\n Victor Marrero\n U.S.D.J.\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2026-06-05T15:56:45.555420-07:00","document_number":"64","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"127038663711","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":true,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2025-12-03T14:05:10.764446-08:00","date_modified":"2026-07-04T10:37:43.407020-07:00","date_filed":"2025-12-03","time_filed":"15:01:58","entry_number":64,"recap_sequence_number":"2025-12-03.001","pacer_sequence_number":256,"description":" ORDER: The Court is in receipt of the parties' joint status letter and proposed Case Management plan. (See Dkt. No. 63.) The parties are hereby directed to submit an amended proposed Case Management Plan providing that no further joinder of additional parties or filing of amended pleadings can be made without leave of court. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 12/3/2025) (jca)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/445802434/","id":445802434,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/68232570/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/460510410/","id":460510410,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/68232570/63/in-re-hut-8-corp-securities-litigation/","date_created":"2025-12-01T17:10:17.942215-08:00","date_modified":"2026-06-09T05:42:30.143307-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"63","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"127038649448","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Letter","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2025-12-01T17:10:17.901941-08:00","date_modified":"2026-06-09T05:42:30.115140-07:00","date_filed":"2025-12-01","time_filed":"18:30:29","entry_number":63,"recap_sequence_number":"2025-12-01.001","pacer_sequence_number":254,"description":"JOINT LETTER addressed to Judge Victor Marrero from Murielle J. Steven Walsh and Monica K. Loseman dated December 1, 2025 Document filed by Abhishek Maheshwari. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order - Proposed Civil Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order).(Steven, Murielle) (Entered: 12/01/2025)","tags":[]}],"entries_total":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/?count=on&docket=68232570&page_size=40"}