{"cached_at":"2026-10-22T10:47:06.982396+00:00","cl_docket_id":"67937090","docket":{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67937090/","id":67937090,"court":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/courts/txnd/","court_id":"txnd","original_court_info":null,"idb_data":null,"clusters":[],"audio_files":[],"assigned_to":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/people/1782/","referred_to":null,"bankruptcy_information":null,"absolute_url":"/docket/67937090/kolarov-v-dallas-college/","date_created":"2023-11-01T15:24:54.889280-07:00","date_modified":"2025-06-23T05:47:05.345519-07:00","source":1,"appeal_from_str":"","assigned_to_str":"Ed Kinkeade","referred_to_str":"","panel_str":"","date_last_index":"2024-05-27T03:06:24.032784-07:00","date_cert_granted":null,"date_cert_denied":null,"date_argued":null,"date_reargued":null,"date_reargument_denied":null,"date_filed":"2023-11-01","date_terminated":"2024-02-27","date_last_filing":"2024-02-27","case_name_short":"Kolarov","case_name":"Kolarov v. Dallas College","case_name_full":"","slug":"kolarov-v-dallas-college","docket_number":"3:23-cv-02426","docket_number_core":"2302426","docket_number_raw":"3:23-cv-02426","docket_number_source":0,"federal_dn_office_code":"3","federal_dn_case_type":"cv","federal_dn_judge_initials_assigned":"K","federal_dn_judge_initials_referred":"","federal_defendant_number":null,"pacer_case_id":"382852","cause":"42:1983 Civil Rights Act","nature_of_suit":"442 Civil Rights: Employment","jury_demand":"Plaintiff","jurisdiction_type":"Federal Question","appellate_fee_status":"","appellate_case_type_information":"","mdl_status":"","filepath_ia":"","filepath_ia_json":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"ia_needs_upload":true,"ia_date_first_change":"2023-11-01T15:24:54.885557-07:00","date_blocked":null,"blocked":false,"appeal_from":null,"parent_docket":null,"tags":[],"panel":[]},"parties":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/13315147/","id":13315147,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8946027/","attorney_id":8946027,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67937090/","docket_id":67937090,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9011527/","attorney_id":9011527,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67937090/","docket_id":67937090,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67937090/","docket_id":67937090,"name":"Defendant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2024-01-26T13:02:44.351715-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-26T13:02:44.351722-08:00","name":"Dallas College","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/13315146/","id":13315146,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8946025/","attorney_id":8946025,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67937090/","docket_id":67937090,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8946025/","attorney_id":8946025,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67937090/","docket_id":67937090,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8946026/","attorney_id":8946026,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67937090/","docket_id":67937090,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67937090/","docket_id":67937090,"name":"Plaintiff","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2024-01-26T13:02:44.258854-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-26T13:02:44.258861-08:00","name":"Krasimir Kolarov","extra_info":""}],"entries":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/379564835/","id":379564835,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67937090/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/387287889/","id":387287889,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67937090/15/kolarov-v-dallas-college/","date_created":"2024-02-27T08:49:46.111416-08:00","date_modified":"2024-02-27T08:49:46.121236-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"15","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-02-27T08:49:46.096940-08:00","date_modified":"2024-02-27T08:49:46.101214-08:00","date_filed":"2024-02-27","time_filed":null,"entry_number":15,"recap_sequence_number":"2024-02-27.001","pacer_sequence_number":null,"description":"ELECTRONIC AGREED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE - Before the Court is the Joint Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice filed by the Plaintiff Krasimir Kolarov (\"Plaintiff\") and Dallas College (\"Defendant\"). The Motion is GRANTED.IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that all claims by Plaintiff against Defendant, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE TO REFILING SAME, and with costs of suit and attorneys' fees taxed against the Party incurring the same. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 2/27/2024) (chmb) (Entered: 02/27/2024)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/379564834/","id":379564834,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67937090/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/387287888/","id":387287888,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67937090/14/kolarov-v-dallas-college/","date_created":"2024-02-27T08:49:46.081653-08:00","date_modified":"2024-02-27T08:49:46.089355-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"14","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"177016651169","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-02-27T08:49:46.066675-08:00","date_modified":"2024-02-27T08:49:46.069838-08:00","date_filed":"2024-02-26","time_filed":null,"entry_number":14,"recap_sequence_number":"2024-02-26.001","pacer_sequence_number":34,"description":"Joint MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice filed by Dallas College (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)Attorney Kristin Snyder Higgins added to party Dallas College (pty:dft) (Higgins, Kristin) (Entered: 02/26/2024)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/379564833/","id":379564833,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67937090/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/387287887/","id":387287887,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67937090/12/kolarov-v-dallas-college/","date_created":"2024-02-27T08:49:46.008415-08:00","date_modified":"2024-02-27T08:49:46.016423-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"12","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"177016619696","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-02-27T08:49:45.985496-08:00","date_modified":"2024-02-27T08:49:45.989978-08:00","date_filed":"2024-02-13","time_filed":null,"entry_number":12,"recap_sequence_number":"2024-02-13.001","pacer_sequence_number":30,"description":"Joint STATUS REPORT Regarding Contents of Scheduling Order filed by Krasimir Kolarov. (Klein, Stefanie) (Entered: 02/13/2024)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/379559059/","id":379559059,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67937090/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/387282024/","id":387282024,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"","date_created":"2024-02-27T08:09:23.558970-08:00","date_modified":"2024-02-27T08:09:23.563766-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order on Motion to Dismiss","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-02-27T08:09:23.544696-08:00","date_modified":"2024-02-27T08:09:23.544711-08:00","date_filed":"2024-02-27","time_filed":"09:49:33","entry_number":null,"recap_sequence_number":"2024-02-27.001","pacer_sequence_number":null,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/378420926/","id":378420926,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67937090/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/386090360/","id":386090360,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67937090/13/kolarov-v-dallas-college/","date_created":"2024-02-14T10:22:40.399012-08:00","date_modified":"2024-02-27T08:49:46.050359-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"13","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"177016621372","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Scheduling Order","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-02-14T10:22:40.342986-08:00","date_modified":"2024-02-27T08:49:46.027854-08:00","date_filed":"2024-02-14","time_filed":"11:35:52","entry_number":13,"recap_sequence_number":"2024-02-14.001","pacer_sequence_number":32,"description":"SCHEDULING ORDER: Jury Trial set for 4/7/2025 09:00 AM before Judge Ed Kinkeade. Deadline for mediation is on or before 6/14/2024. Joint Report on medation due by 6/21/2024. Joinder of Parties due by 6/28/2024. Amended Pleadings due by 6/28/2024. Discovery due by 10/18/2024. Motions due by 11/18/2024. Pretrial Order due by 3/17/2025. Pretrial Materials due by 3/17/2025. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 2/14/2024) (chmb) (Entered: 02/14/2024)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/377917982/","id":377917982,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67937090/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/385577806/","id":385577806,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67937090/11/kolarov-v-dallas-college/","date_created":"2024-02-08T09:24:33.702635-08:00","date_modified":"2024-02-27T08:49:45.962048-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"11","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"177016607771","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Answer to Amended Complaint","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-02-08T09:24:33.665425-08:00","date_modified":"2024-02-27T08:49:45.928379-08:00","date_filed":"2024-02-08","time_filed":"10:23:44","entry_number":11,"recap_sequence_number":"2024-02-08.001","pacer_sequence_number":28,"description":"ANSWER to 9 Amended Complaint,, filed by Dallas College. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Martinson, Gavin) (Entered: 02/08/2024)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/376774636/","id":376774636,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67937090/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/384409830/","id":384409830,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67937090/10/kolarov-v-dallas-college/","date_created":"2024-01-26T13:02:44.239253-08:00","date_modified":"2024-02-27T08:49:45.905541-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"10","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-01-26T13:02:44.223864-08:00","date_modified":"2024-02-27T08:49:45.884328-08:00","date_filed":"2024-01-26","time_filed":null,"entry_number":10,"recap_sequence_number":"2024-01-26.001","pacer_sequence_number":null,"description":"ELECTRONIC ORDER - On January 25, 2024, Plaintiff Krasimir Kolarov filed a First Amended Complaint. Doc. No. 9. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendant Dallas College's previously pending Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Original Complaint, Doc. No. 6, as moot. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 1/26/2024) (chmb) (Entered: 01/26/2024)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/376774635/","id":376774635,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67937090/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/384409829/","id":384409829,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67937090/7/kolarov-v-dallas-college/","date_created":"2024-01-26T13:02:44.128364-08:00","date_modified":"2024-02-27T08:49:45.785558-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"7","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"177016515088","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-01-26T13:02:44.111632-08:00","date_modified":"2024-02-27T08:49:45.768214-08:00","date_filed":"2024-01-04","time_filed":null,"entry_number":7,"recap_sequence_number":"2024-01-04.002","pacer_sequence_number":20,"description":"CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Dallas College. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Martinson, Gavin) (Entered: 01/04/2024)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/376774634/","id":376774634,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67937090/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/384409828/","id":384409828,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67937090/6/kolarov-v-dallas-college/","date_created":"2024-01-26T13:02:44.092328-08:00","date_modified":"2024-02-27T08:49:45.752113-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"6","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"177016515070","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-01-26T13:02:44.074387-08:00","date_modified":"2024-02-27T08:49:45.732826-08:00","date_filed":"2024-01-04","time_filed":null,"entry_number":6,"recap_sequence_number":"2024-01-04.001","pacer_sequence_number":17,"description":"MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs Original Complaint and Brief in Support filed by Dallas College with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)Attorney Gavin S Martinson added to party Dallas College (pty:dft) (Martinson, Gavin) (Entered: 01/04/2024)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/376774633/","id":376774633,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67937090/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/384409827/","id":384409827,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67937090/3/kolarov-v-dallas-college/","date_created":"2024-01-26T13:02:43.968757-08:00","date_modified":"2024-02-27T08:49:45.620588-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"3","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"177016384643","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-01-26T13:02:43.949219-08:00","date_modified":"2024-02-27T08:49:45.604383-08:00","date_filed":"2023-11-02","time_filed":null,"entry_number":3,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-11-02.001","pacer_sequence_number":10,"description":"Summons Issued as to Dallas College. (oyh) (Entered: 11/02/2023)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/376774632/","id":376774632,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67937090/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/384409826/","id":384409826,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67937090/2/kolarov-v-dallas-college/","date_created":"2024-01-26T13:02:43.929184-08:00","date_modified":"2024-02-27T08:49:45.586940-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"2","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"177016384631","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-01-26T13:02:43.910798-08:00","date_modified":"2024-02-27T08:49:45.568348-08:00","date_filed":"2023-11-01","time_filed":null,"entry_number":2,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-11-01.002","pacer_sequence_number":8,"description":"New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (oyh) (Entered: 11/02/2023)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/376736486/","id":376736486,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67937090/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/384371031/","id":384371031,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"","date_created":"2024-01-26T09:25:29.253384-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-26T09:25:29.257607-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order on Motion to Dismiss","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-01-26T09:25:29.241656-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-26T09:25:29.241672-08:00","date_filed":"2024-01-26","time_filed":"10:41:59","entry_number":null,"recap_sequence_number":"2024-01-26.001","pacer_sequence_number":null,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/376671605/","id":376671605,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67937090/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/384304536/","id":384304536,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67937090/9/kolarov-v-dallas-college/","date_created":"2024-01-25T15:27:19.801733-08:00","date_modified":"2024-02-27T08:49:45.862267-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"9","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"177016574603","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Amended Complaint","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-01-25T15:27:19.787015-08:00","date_modified":"2024-02-27T08:49:45.843813-08:00","date_filed":"2024-01-25","time_filed":"16:44:22","entry_number":9,"recap_sequence_number":"2024-01-25.001","pacer_sequence_number":24,"description":"AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Dallas College filed by Krasimir Kolarov. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Klein, Stefanie) (Entered: 01/25/2024)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/374791395/","id":374791395,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67937090/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/382382658/","id":382382658,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67937090/8/kolarov-v-dallas-college/","date_created":"2024-01-04T13:25:54.431780-08:00","date_modified":"2024-02-27T08:49:45.820174-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"8","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"177016516774","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order for Scheduling Order Proposal","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-01-04T13:25:54.413775-08:00","date_modified":"2024-02-27T08:49:45.801265-08:00","date_filed":"2024-01-04","time_filed":"15:20:28","entry_number":8,"recap_sequence_number":"2024-01-04.003","pacer_sequence_number":22,"description":"ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND REPORT FOR CONTENTS OF SCHEDULING ORDER. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 1/4/2024) (chmb) (Entered: 01/04/2024)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/372665166/","id":372665166,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67937090/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/380205063/","id":380205063,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67937090/5/kolarov-v-dallas-college/","date_created":"2023-12-07T13:24:13.832336-08:00","date_modified":"2024-02-27T08:49:45.703420-08:00","sha1":"e4322cfe45599c015f15d3121a0bcbd212ffd64e","page_count":10,"file_size":810237,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.txnd.382852/gov.uscourts.txnd.382852.5.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.txnd.382852/gov.uscourts.txnd.382852.5.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":"recap-thumbnails/gov.uscourts.txnd.382852/380205063.thumb.1068_1.png","thumbnail_status":1,"plain_text":"Case 3:23-cv-02426-K Document5 Filed 12/07/23 Page 1 of/10_ PagelDi88r cour\n\nvance\nDEC 72023 |\nIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT | CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT CouRT\n\nFOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS | By.\nDALLAS DIVISION\n\nSPECIAL ORDER NO. 3-351\n\nEffective December 7, 2023, active cases that are assigned or referred to United States\nMagistrate Judge Irma C. Ramirez will be transferred to the dockets of the other magistrate judges\nin the Dallas Division as outlined on Exhibit A attached to this order. Any case assigned to\nMagistrate Judge Ramirez not listed on Exhibit A will be reassigned as necessary via random\n\nassignment to another magistrate judge in the Dallas Division.\nSO ORDERED.\n\nDecember 7, 2023\n\nDAC.\n\nDAVID C. GODBEY\nCHIEF JUDGE\n\n\fCase 3:23-cv-02426-K Document5 Filed 12/07/23 Page2of10 PagelD 34\nEXHIBIT A\n\nCASES TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF\nJUDGE IRMA C. RAMIREZ TO JUDGE RENEE H. TOLIVER\n\n# Case No. Case Name\n4 3:15-cv-03912-B Vickers v. USA\n2 3:16-cv-01848-K Mayes v. USA\n3 3:19-cv-02281-K Federal Trade Commission v. Match Group Inc\n4 3:20-cv-03476-D Valdez-Villalobos v. USA\n5 3:21-cv-00015-L Kelley v. Barr\n6 3:21-cv-00249-N Gomez v. USA\n7 3:21-cv-01128-B Lopez-Hernandez v. USA\n8 3:21-cv-01532-D Rambo v. USA\n9 3:21-cv-01713-L Veasey v. USA\n10 [3:21-cv-02044-B Hudgens v. USA\n11 |3:21-cv-02177-D Ramirez v. USA\n12  |3:21-cv-02237-M Hernandez v. USA\n13 |3:21-cv-02287-L Segura-Resendez v. USA\n14 |3:21-cev-02932-X% Dunn v. USA\n15  |3:21-cv-03167-M Sealed v. Sealed\n16  |3:22-cv-00357-S Saustegui-Perez v. USA\n17  |3:22-cv-00515-N Exxon Mobil Corporation v. United States of America\n18  |3:22-cv-00914-M Armstrong v. USA\n19 |3:22-cv-01161-N Lowery v. USA\n20 |3:22-cv-01340-B Silav. USA\n21 |3:22-cv-01353-M Joe v. USA\n22 |3:22-cv-01415-S Securities and Exchange Commission v. Baker et al\n23 |3:22-cv-01507-N Braddick v. USA\n24 |3:22-cv-01786-N Hermesch v. USA\n25 = |3:22-cv-01869-E Walsh v. Peterson, et al\n26 = |3:22-cv-01945-B Sanchez v. USA\n27 _|3.22-cv-02157-G___|United States of America v. King et al\n28 = |3:22-cv-02304-B Reece v. United States of America\n29 = |3:22-cv-02318-B Brewer v. USA\n30  |3:22-cv-02367-O Pittman v. United States of America\n31  |3:22-cv-02460-N Royes v. USA\n32 _|3:22-cv-02601-K Dent v. McDonough\n33  |3:22-cv-02782-E Samano-Mancilla v. USA\n34  |3:22-cv-02905-B Rahim v. USA\n35 |3:22-mc-00014-N {Sealed v. Sealed\n\nNational Labor Relations Board, Region 16 v. LM Carpet Cleaning Resurfacing\n\n36 _|3:22-mc-00079-X__|& Power Washing _\n37 |3:23-cv-00074-K Pool v. United States of America\n38 |3:23-cv-00200-S Williams v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration\n39 = |3:23-cv-00259-L Morales v. USA\n40 |3:23-cv-00348-S Sealed v. Sealed\n41 |3:23-cv-00539-E Aguayo v. United States of America\n42  |3:23-cv-00731-X Griffin v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al\n43 |3:23-cv-00795-M Perez v. Experian Information Soutions et al\n44  |3:23-cv-01004-X Williams v. Bureau of Prisons\n45 |3:23-cv-01126-B Ramirez-Ramirez v. USA\n46 |3:23-cv-01177-D Leonard v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration\n47 |3:23-cv-01282-L Sealed v. Sealed\n48 |3:23-cv-01370-N Rosales v. USA\n\n\fCase 3:23-cv-02426-K Document5 Filed 12/07/23. Page 3of10 PagelD 35\n\nEXHIBIT A\n\nCASES TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF\nJUDGE IRMA C. RAMIREZ TO JUDGE RENEE H. TOLIVER\n\nCase No.\n\nCase Name\n\n3:23-cv-01399-G\n\nDili v. Experian Information Solutions Inc.\n\n3:23-cv-01481-E\n\nSealed v. Sealed\n\n3:23-cv-01488-G\n\nNathan Thomas v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration\n\n\u00a72 _|3:23-cv-01645-X Moses v. USA\n53. |3:23-cv-01698-L Jaffari v. Garland et al\n54 |3:23-cv-01771-K Day et al v. Experian Information Solutions Inc et al\n\n3:23-cv-01842-X\n\nGayton v. Rivers\n\n3:23-cv-01882-L\n\nBrowning v. USA\n\n57 |3:23-cv-02030-K Ibarra-Hernandez v. USA\n\n58 _|3:23-cv-02046-N Morrison v. Dallas County Human Sex Trafficking Task Force et al\n59 = |3:23-cv-02088-L Gordon v. Kellam\n\n60 |3:23-cv-02174- Scottline LLC v. United States of America et al\n\n61 = |3:23-cv-02207-N Schmeer et al v. Blinkin et al\n\n3:23-cv-02324-B\n\nDelgado v. United States of America\n\n3:23-cv-02358-D\n\nMontante et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons\n\n3:23-cv-02402-E\n\nLathem et al v. Blinken\n\n3:23-cv-02438-N\n\nBlanks v. Federal Correctional Institution Seagoville et al\n\n3:23-cv-02458-B\n\nBlair v. Department of Veterans Affairs\n\n3:23-cv-02496-X\n\nMalachowski v. United States of America\n\n3:23-cv-02549-S\n\nGonzalez-Oregel v. USA\n\n3:23-cv-02606-X\n\nAngels of Care Home Health Inc . Becerra\n\n3:23-mc-00074-B\n\nUnited States of America v. $101,994.00 US Currency et al\n\n3:20-cv-01835\n\nBoss Exotics LLC v. Crosta and Partners LLC\n\n\fCase 3:23-cv-02426-K Document5 Filed 12/07/23. Page 4of10 PagelD 36\n\nEXHIBIT A\n\nCASES TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF\nJUDGE IRMA C. RAMIREZ TO JUDGE DAVID L. HORAN\n\n# Case No. Case Name\n1 3:17-cv-02713-X Capio Funding LLC v. Rural/Metro Operating Company LLC et al\n2 3:18-cv-00898-M Balboa Capital Corporation v. Okoji Home Visits MHT LLC et al\niS 3:18-cv-02862-M Jean et al v. Guyger et al\n4 3:18-cv-03308-E Kelson et al v. City of Dallas et al\n5 3:19-cv-01067-K Von Colditz v. Woods et al\n6 3:20-cv-00045-D Rodriguez v. Southern Health Partners Inc et al\n7 3:20-cv-00313-N Hamilton et al v. Dallas County\n8 3:20-cv-00691-D Shen v. Exela Technologies Inc et al\n9 3:20-cv-01358-E Coleman et al v. Brozen et al\n10 3:20-cv-03636-K Blue Yonder Group Inc v. Kinaxis Inc et al\n11 3:21-cv-00957-B Briones v. Director, TDCJ, CID\n12 3:21-cv-01253-B Coleman v. Combs et al\n13 3:21-cv-01284-N Gutierrez v. Director, TDCJ-CID\n14 3:21-cv-01498-B Halperin et al v. Wills et al\n15 3:21-cv-01868-L Greenidge v. Carter et al\n16 3:21-cv-02203-X SJ Professional Services LLC et al v. Breiter-Wu et al\n17 3:21-cv-02627-D Ryan v. Wells Fargo Bank NC\n18 3:21-cv-02677-N Armstrong et al v. Bam! Pizza Management Inc et al\n19 3:21-cv-02996-N Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID\n20 3:22-cv-00034-X McClung et al v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC et al\n21 3:22-cv-00141-N Bell v. Moore\n22 3:22-cv-00290-B Impact Finishing Inc v. Wild Card Inc et al\n23 3:22-cv-00392-B Worrall v. Love Style Inc et al\n24 3:22-cv-00525-X Fiberco, Inc. v. Acadia Insurance Company\n25 3:22-cv-01342-B Noviello v. West 360 LLC\n26 3:22-cv-01394-G Fenner v. Hanna et al\n27 3:22-cv-01441-G Serges v. Evergreen Presbyterian Ministries of Texas Inc et al\n28 3:22-cv-01612-B Wallace v. Fiesta Mart LLC\n29 3:22-cv-01703-D IR Air Inc v. Petros et al\n30 3:22-cv-01751-S Ako v. Arriva Best Security Inc et al\n31 3:22-cv-01770-L Overton v. Navajo Express Inc et al\n32 3:22-cv-01889-K Roubinek v. PHH Mortgage\n33 3:22-cv-01933-X Grimes v. Santander Consumer USA\n34 3:22-cv-01936-B Richardson v. Walmart Stores Texas LLC et al\n35 3-22-cv-02018-N Zurich American Insurance Company v. Great West Casualty\nCompany\n36 3:22-cv-02062-X Shuler Drilling Company Inc v. Disiere Partners LLC, et al\n37 3:22-cv-02151-B Sailer v. American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida\n38 3:22-cv-02161-S USI Southwest Inc v. HUB International Insurance Services Inc\n39 3:22-cv-02403-N Carey v. Director, TDCJ-CID\n40 3:22-cv-02410-G Castillo v. Walmart Inc et al\n41 3:22-cv-02471-S Martinez, Jr v. Peterson et al\n42 3:22-CV-02475-E Horton v. 360 Digital Media LLC\n43 3:22-cv-02600-X Venzant v. Bigelow Arizona TX-282 LP et al\n44 3:22-cv-02774-E Samurai Global LLC v. Brothers et al\n45 3:22-cv-02781-N Cottingim v. Emergency Staffing Solutions Inc.\n\n3\n\fCase 3:23-cv-02426-K Document5 Filed 12/07/23. Page5of10 PagelD 37\n\nEXHIBIT A\n\nCASES TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF\nJUDGE IRMA C. RAMIREZ TO JUDGE DAVID L. HORAN\n\n# Case No. Case Name\n46 3:22-cv-02789-G Scott v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al\n47 3:22-cv-02798-K Karim v. Covalent Grup Inc et al\n48 3:22-cv-02805-L Ison-Newsome v. JPMorgan Chase Bank National Association\n49 3:22-cv-02816-D Smith v. Reyes et al\n50 3:22-cv-02837-B Frank Surveying Co Inc v. Harp\n51 3:22-cv-02874-K Fernau v. Kaunas Trucking Inc et al\n52 3:22-cv-02923-N NBTY Manufacturing LLC v. Compass Alpha LLC\n53 3:23-cv-00010-N Sims v. Dallas Independent School District\n54 3:23-cv-00086-M Baze v. County Constable\n55 3:23-cv-00099-K Lewis v. Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations LLC\n56 3:23-cv-00116-M Maynard v. QuikTrip Corporation et al\n57 3:23-cv-00118-L Howard v. Walmart Inc\n58 3:23-cv-00185-L Mitchell v. Sorenson Communication\n59 3:23-cv-00230-X Faulk v. Owens Cornings\n60 3-23-cv-00243-S ef Variable Insurance Company v. Estate of James E. Frost II et\n61 3:23-cv-00244-L Gutierrez v. Dallas County Municipalities and Entities et al\n62 3:23-cv-00280-K Mercury Associates Inc v. Primoris Services Corporation\n63 3:23-cv-00303-N Paige v. State Farm Lloyds\n64 3:23-cv-00307-E Hardisty v. Family Moving Services Inc.\n65 3:23-cv-00333-M Campos v. Swift Beef Company\n66 3:23-cv-00370-S G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC v. Bar Sante Fe LLC et al\n67 3:23-cv-00391-D Walker v. Hoffman et al\n68 3:23-cv-00419-K OQ Chemicals Corporation v. Turner Industries Group LLC\n69 3:23-cv-00457-E Dolan v. Penske Automotive Group Inc et al\n70 3:23-cv-00545-G The D\u00e9cor Group Inc v. River City Lights Inc et al\n71 3:23-cv-00547-K Bilbo v. Central Transport LLC\n72 3:23-cv-00568-B Cunningham v. State Farm Lloyds\n73 3:23-cv-00604-K OSGHD LLC v. Nomi Health Inc et al\n74 3:23-cv-00606-S Sol v. City of Dallas Texas\n75 3:23-cv-00607-G James et al v. Experian Information Solutions Inc et al\n76 3:23-cv-00643-G Celestine v. Kroger Texas L.P.\n77 3:23-cv-00649-K Santry et al v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC\n78 3:23-cv-00681-D Scott v. Kroger Texas LP\n79 3:23-cv-00705-L Brady v. QuikTrip Corporation et al\n80 3-23-cv-00706-E Arka Mesquire Investments LLC et al v. Philadelphia Indemnity\nInsurance Company\n81 3:23-cv-00747-X Goodwin v. Sedgewick Claim Management Services Inc et al\n82 3:23-cv-00757-D Manigo v. JB Hunt Transport Inc et al\n83 3:23-cv-00763-N GH Holistic LLC v. Wizard's Smoke Shop LLC et al\n84 3:23-cv-00803-L Innovative Sports Management Inc v. Longhorn IceHouse LLC et al\n85 3:23-cv-00804-N innovative Sports Management Inc v. Mi Pueblito Colombiano LLC\n86 3:23-cv-00819-G White v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC\n87 3:23-cv-00845-L Dairy Brands Fluid LLC et al v. Altium Packaging LP\n88 3:23-cv-00850-K Williams v. ACCO Brands Corporation et al\n\n\fCase 3:23-cv-02426-K Document5 Filed 12/07/23. Page6of10 PagelD 38\n\nEXHIBIT A\n\nCASES TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF\nJUDGE IRMA C. RAMIREZ TO JUDGE DAVID L. HORAN\n\n# Case No. Case Name\n89 3:23-cv-00873-M Savannah at Lakeview LP et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's\nLondon et al\n90 3:23-cv-00874-L Forteza v. Vehicle Service Department et al\n91 3:23-cv-00882-L GS Holistic LLC v. B Over 21 Inc et al\n92 3:23-cv-00977-S Brown v. Sam's East Inc\n93 3:23-cv-00996-D King v. Costco Wholesale Corporation\n94 3:23-cv-01018-X Licht v. Ling et al\n95 3:23-cv-01028-K Gathright v. Wayne McCollum Detention Center\n96 3:23-cv-01030-E Wells v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC\n97 3:23-cv-01036-N Gomez v. Mohamud et al\n98 3:23-cv-01037-K Smarr v. CVS Health Corporation et al\n99 3:23-cv-01039-B Jane Doe AS v. Salesforce Inc et al\n100 _|3:23-cv-01104-M Quintana Gonzalez v. LJ Drilling Inc et al\n101 |3:23-cv-01180-E Nobles v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC\n102 |3:23-cv-01199-E Gores v. Trans Union LLC et al\n103 |3:23-cv-01216-S Retana v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC et al\n104  |3:23-cv-01228-G Garcia v. Fiesta Mart LLC et al\n105 \u2014|3:23-cv-01254-L Vino v. Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company et al\n106 |3:23-cv-01297-B Josey v. Caris Life Science Inc\n107 |3:23-cv-01301-X Dheera Limited Company v. Johnson Controls Inc et al\n108 = |3:23-cv-01333-E Adame v. University of Texas at Dallas\n109 |3:23-cv-01339-E Terri E Newkirk IRA v. Kelly e tal\n110 |3:23-cv-01345-L Russell v. Kroger Texas, LP\n111 |3:23-cv-01349-S Jacob v. CVS Pharmacy Inc\n112 _|3:23-cv-01356-L Perez v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLC et al\n113 |3:23-cv-01371-G West v. R&K Enterprise Colutions et al\n114 |[3:23-cv-01375-X Isidro v. CRST Expedited Inc et al\n115 |3:23-cv-01382-G Akmal v. Columbia Debt Recovery LLC\n116  |3:23-cv-01390-E Pertee v. Risher et al\n117 \u2014_|3:23-cv-01397-K Chanel Inc v. Vintage to Vogue Designs LLC et al\n118  |3:23-cv-01443-S Staggs v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al\n119 |3:23-cv-01453-E Johnson et al v. Lane et al\n120 _|3:23-cv-01476-X Air Vent Inc v. Powerman Electric Co Ltd Guangdong\n121 |3:23-cv-01503-B Charitable DAF Fund LP et al v. Highland Capital Management LP\n122 |3:23-cv-01505-L Cox v. Bristo et al\n123. |3:23-cv-01507-B GS Holistic LLC v. HGBP LLC e tal\n124 |3:23-cv-01525-X Biovant LLC v. BT] AG LLC etal\n125  |3:23-cv-01537-X Bryant v. Villalobos\n126 |3:23-cv-01556-E Post v. Williams Rush & Associates LLC et al\n127 = |3:23-cv-01557-D Clark v. Wyndham Worldwide, Inc.\n128  |3:23-cv-01561-K Erwin et al v. Metalcraft of Mayville Inc.\n129  |3:23-cv-01572-K Ferrari Financial Service Inc v. Yoo et al\n130 |3:23-cv-01582-S Dugan et al v. Reservoir Restaurant Inc.\n131 |3:23-cv-01591-S Wozniak v. Hanson et al\n132 |3:23-cv-01613-X Yeats v. Jenkins & Youth PC\n133 |3:23-cv-01617-X Holmes v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al\n134 |3:23-cv-01621-S Niter et al v. Brown et al\n135 _|3:23-cv-01630-B Reed v. Fiesta Mart LLC\n136 _|3:23-cv-01638-N Aguilar v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC\n\n5\n\fCase 3:23-cv-02426-K Document5 Filed 12/07/23. Page 7of10 PagelD 39\n\nEXHIBIT A\n\nCASES TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF\nJUDGE IRMA C. RAMIREZ TO JUDGE DAVID L. HORAN\n\n# Case No. Case Name\n\n137  |3:23-cv-01653-N Minor v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC\n\n138 |3:23-cv-01669-B Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Does\n\n139  |3:23-cv-01675-L Van-Zandt Reiss et al v The Bank of New York Mellon\n\n140 |3:23-cv-01680-S Trigg et al v. Martin et al\n\n141. |3:23-cv-01690-S Young v. Teamsters 767\n\n142 = |3:23-cv-01700-L Vickers v. American Economy Insurance Company\n\n143 |3:23-cv-01729-G Coleman v. Swift Transportation\n\n144 = |3:23-cv-01775-X Palmer v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc.\n\n145  |3:23-cv-01800-N Gardner v. Crestbrook Insurance Company\n\n146 |3:23-cv-01802-E Mcgehee v. Pallida LLC\n\n147 \u2014|3:23-cv-01804-S Lindum Development LLC v. Markel Insurance Company\n\n148 \u2014 |3:23-cv-01805-E McConnell v. Applied Digital Corporation et al\n\n149  |3:23-cv-01858-D The Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company v. Universal Protection\nService LLC\n\n150  |3:23-cv-01856-E Moore v. RaceTrac Inc\n\n151  |3:23-cv-01864-L VDPP LLC v. One Plus Corp\n\n152 |3:23-cv-01880-S Perry v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al\n\n153 |3:23-cv-01907-X Haywood v. Walmart Stores Texas LLC\n\n154  |3:23-cv-01912-S Lessig v. Fiesta Mart LLC\n\n155 | 3:23-cv-01966-K Brown v. Equifax Information Services LLC\n\n156 |3:23-cv-01968-K Plemons v. Allstate Insurance Company\n\n157 \u2014|3:23-cv-02010-B Johnson et al v. Crosby Elementary School et al\n\n158 |3:23-cv-02033-E Birnam Wood Capital LLC v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance\nCompany\n\n159  |3:23-cv-02043-X The Expo Group LLC v. Purdy\n\n160 \u2014 |3:23-cv-02056-L Thompson v. City of Dallas et al\n\n161 |3:23-cv-02067-G Sturgeon v. Director, TDCJ-CID\n\n162 |3:23-cv-02070-G Summers v. Longbrake et al\n\n163  |3:23-cv-02076-S Match Group LLC v. LiveMe America Inc et al\n\n164 |3:23-cv-02095-N Dickerson v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al\n\n165 \u2014|3:23-cv-02108-D Savoia v. Danley\n\n166  |3:23-cv-02132-L Gibson v. State of Texas 413th Judicial District Court of Johnson\nCounty et al\n\n167 |3:23-cv-02182-X Prough v. Dallas County Jail et al\n\n168  |3:23-cv-02198-L Caldwell et al v. Duncanville Police Department et al\n\n169 |3:23-cv-02199-N Morris v. Parole Board\n\n170 = |3:23-cv-02226-K Jones v. ABM Industry Groups LLC et al\n\n171 = |3:23-cv-02239-L Edwards v. First Trust Portfolios LP\n\n472 |3:23-cv-02270-E Park Construction and Building Maintenance LLC v. Bureau Veritas\nProject Management LLC et al\n\n173 |3:23-cv-02282-G Collier v. Bristow\n\n174 = |3:23-cv-02284-G. Stanley v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC\n\n175  |3:23-cv-02294-B Andrews v. York et al\n\n176 \u2014 |3:23-cv-02302-L Huffman v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC\n\n177 = |3:23-cv-02303-S Seiko Epson Corporation et al v. Weston Tees LLC et al\n\n178  |3:23-cv-02305-B Lynk Media, LLC v. Capital Hill Publishing Corp.\n\n179 = |3:23-cv-02319-K Martinez v. PTG Logistics LLC et al\n\n180  |3:23-cv-02373-N Wilson v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC et al\n\n181 |3:23-cv-02375-E Nelson v. Unknown\n\n182 |3:23-cv-02387-L Nasrallah v. Scottsdale Insurance Company\n\n6\n\n\fCase 3:23-cv-02426-K Document5 Filed 12/07/23. Page 8of10 PagelD 40\n\nEXHIBIT A\nCASES TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF\nJUDGE IRMA C. RAMIREZ TO JUDGE DAVID L. HORAN\n# Case No. Case Name\n\n183 |3:23-cv-02389-S Pecina v. Kroger Texas LP\n\n184  |3:23-cv-02417-L Clear Blue Insurance Company v. Whitaker et al\n\n185 = |3:23-cv-02421-X Principal Life Insurance Company v. Roque et al\n\n186  |3:23-cv-02426-K Kolarov v. Dallas College\n\n187 = |3:23-cv-02427-K Radford v. Texas Board of Pardon and Parole\n\n188 | 3:23-cv-02450-L Hernandez v. Dollar Tree Store #1326 et al\n\n189  |3:23-cv-02452-B Garcia v. Amano Pioneer Eclipse Corporation\n\n190 |3:23-cv-02481-L Rodriguez v. The Home Depot USA Inc\n\n191  |3:23-cv-02484-S Trotter v. Texas Office of the Attorney General et al\n\n192  |3:23-cv-02494-S Hossain v. The Boeing Company\n\n193  |3:23-cv-02504-K DAV Sub Inc v. QliqSOFT Inc\n\n194 |3:23-cv-02525-B Garret v. Kohls Distribution eFulfillment Center\n\n195 _|3:23-cv-02539-X Bowers v. Uplift Education\n\n196 |3:23-cv-02561-N Borge v. Mr Cooper Group Inc\n\n197  |3:23-cv-02562-B Stump v. Mr Cooper Group Inc.\n\n198  |3:23-cv-02594-E Verna IP Holdings LLC v. Dais Inc\n\n199 |3:23-cv-02614-B Coker v. Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company et al\n\n200 = |3:23-cv-02620-K The Sherwin Williams Company v. Binswo Partners Ltd\n\n201 |3:23-cv-02625-X Trinity Industries Leasing Company v. National Union Fire Insurance\n\nCompany\n\n202 = |3:23-cv-02633-S Motton v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC\n\n203 _|3:23-mc-00026-L Olin Corporation v. Tenaska Power Services Co.\n\n204 = |3:23-mc-00054-E Bob Sumerel Tire Co v. Henry N Small MD PA\n\n205 = |3:23-cv-00574-B Martin v. Penske Logistics LLC\n\n206 = |3:23-cv-00320 Cali-Curl Inc LLC v. Marianna Industries Inc et al\n\n\fCase 3:23-cv-02426-K Document5 Filed 12/07/23. Page9of10 PagelD 41\nEXHIBIT A\n\nCASES TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF\n\nJUDGE IRMA C. RAMIREZ TO JUDGE REBECCA RUTHERFORD\n\n# Case No. Case Name\n1 3:16-cv-00279-B Runnels v. USA\n2 __|3:19-cv-01238-E United States of America et al v. Emergency Staffing Solutions Inc et al\n3 3:20-cv-01679-D Holman v. USA\n4 3:20-cv-03538-L Flores v. USA\n5 3:21-cv-00215-D Thomas v. USA\n6 3:21-cv-00563-L Martinez v. USA\n7 3:21-cv-01366-D Ware v. USA\n8 3:21-cv-01680-O Coleman v. USA\n9 3:21-cv-01788-X United States of America v. $67,000 in United States Currency\n10 |3:21-cv-02139-B Corona-Perez v. USA\n11 |3:21-cv-02184-L Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Avila et al\n12  |3:21-cv-02238-M Hernandez v. USA\n13 |3:21-cv-02331-B Securities and Exchange Commission v. Plummer et al\n14 |3:21-cv-03013-N Venegas v. USA\n15 |3:22-cv-00140-G Broadfield v. Rivers\n16 |3:22-cv-00389-N Caballero v. USA\n17  |3:22-cv-00737-D Martinez v. USA\n18  |3:22-cv-01057-L Roy v. United States of America\n19 |3:22-cv-01242-M Cardenas v. USA\n20 |3:22-cv-01341-B Flying R Aviation LLC v. Bondio LLC\n21 |3:22-cv-01359-K Maya v. USA\n22 |3:22-cv-01429-N Favila v. USA\n23 |3:22-cv-01781-M Villasenor v. USA\n24  |3:22-cv-01798-X Rodgers v. USA\n25 _|3:22-cv-01935-X Crawford v. MagicStar Arrow Entertainment LLC et al\n26 |3:22-cv-02004-X Sealed v. Sealed\n27 = |3:22-cv-02177-L Stiger v. USA\n28 = |3:22-cv-02308-X Vascurado v. Mayorkas et al\n29 = |3:22-cv-02321-S Sedwick v. McDonald\n30 = |3:22-cv-02453-E Escobar v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration\n31 |3:22-cv-02465-B Gilbert v. USA\n32  |3:22-cv-02616-X Sealed v. Sealed\n33 |3:22-cv-02807-X SSCP Management Inc et al v. United States Small Business Administration et al\n34 = |3:22-cv-02908-K Petlechkov v. United States of America\n35  |3:22-mc-00037-X Robinson et al v. United States of America\n36 |3:23-cv-00045-E Mauricio et al v. US Postal Service\n37 |3:23-cv-00149-S Doe v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board\n38  |3:23-cv-00203-M Green v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration\n39  |3:23-cv-00271-K Green v. USA\n40  |3:23-cv-00406-L Jovel v. United States of America\n41 |3:23-cv-00597-K State Farm Life Insurance Company v. Wisocki et al\n42 |3:23-cv-00779-S Adetoro v. Experian Information Solutions Inc.\n43 _|3:23-cv-00980-X Sherman v. DeJoy\n44 |3:23-cv-01113-E United States of America et al v. Mr Cooper Group Inc\n45 |3:23-cv-01176-K Crawford v. The United States of America et al\n46 |3:23-cv-01256-N Hardin v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration\n47 _|3:23-cv-01307-B Dillard v. USA\n48 |3:23-cv-01381-L King v. USA\n49 |3:23-cv-01501-M Little v. Dallas RRM\n\n\fCase 3:23-cv-02426-K Document5 Filed 12/07/23. Page 10o0f10 PagelD 42\nEXHIBIT A\n\nCASES TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF\n\nJUDGE IRMA C. RAMIREZ TO JUDGE REBECCA RUTHERFORD\n\n# Case No. Case Name\n50 = |3:23-cv-01646-N Gonzales v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.\n51 |3:23-cv-01743-N Venkata et al v. Blinken et al\n52 |3:23-cv-01799-X Wyatt v. Director, TDCJ-CID\n53 |3:23-cv-01853-E Montez v. USA\n54 |3:23-cv-01992-G Vincent v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration\n55 |3:23-cv-02041-G Lewis v. Rivers\n56 |3:23-cv-02060-K US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Erie Construction MidWest LLC\n57 _|3:23-cv-02157-L United States of America v. Morgan et al\n58  |3:23-cv-02180-D Gamez-Herrera v. USA\n59 |3:23-cv-02194-B Walters v. Garland\n60 = |3:23-cv-02323-X Al Dulaimi et al v. Garland et al\n61 |3:23-cv-02338-K Smith v. USA\n62 |3:23-cv-02363-E Jackson v. Wray et al\n63. |3:23-cv-02436-D Higgins v. Rivers\n64 |3:23-cv-02445-L Fuentes Garcia et al v. Jaddou\n65. |3:23-cv-02474-B Firstley v. United States of America\n66 |3:23-cv-02514-D Pahlavani v. Mayorkas et al\n67  |3:23-cv-02550-N White v. USA\n68 |3:23-cv-02621-B Sealed v. Sealed\n69 |3:23-mc-00044-S United States v. $29,285.00 in U.S. Currency\n70 = |3:23-mc-00043-S Sealed v. Sealed\n71 \u2014_|3:23-cv-1373 Martindale v. Home Depot USA Inc\n\n","ocr_status":1,"date_upload":"2023-12-08T11:33:00.442865-08:00","document_number":"5","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"177016459862","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order AND ~Util - Set/Clear Flags","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2023-12-07T13:24:13.818523-08:00","date_modified":"2024-02-27T08:49:45.687118-08:00","date_filed":"2023-12-07","time_filed":"15:19:03","entry_number":5,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-12-07.001","pacer_sequence_number":14,"description":"Special Order 3-351: Effective December 7, 2023, active cases assigned or referred to Magistrate Judge Irma C. Ramirez will be transferred to the dockets of other magistrate judges in the Dallas Division as outlined on Exhibit A to this order. This case has been reassigned pursuant to Special Order No. 3-351. (The clerk has mailed a copy to all non-ECF users.) (Ordered by Chief District Judge David C Godbey on 12/7/2023) (twd) (Entered: 12/07/2023)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/369800930/","id":369800930,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67937090/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/377174618/","id":377174618,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67937090/4/kolarov-v-dallas-college/","date_created":"2023-11-03T12:23:20.379972-07:00","date_modified":"2024-02-27T08:49:45.662635-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"4","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"177016388695","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2023-11-03T12:23:20.365131-07:00","date_modified":"2024-02-27T08:49:45.643096-08:00","date_filed":"2023-11-03","time_filed":"13:31:07","entry_number":4,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-11-03.001","pacer_sequence_number":12,"description":"ORDER: This Order governs requests to file materials in this case under seal. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 11/3/2023) (chmb) (Entered: 11/03/2023)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/369596647/","id":369596647,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67937090/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/376963938/","id":376963938,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67937090/1/kolarov-v-dallas-college/","date_created":"2023-11-01T15:24:54.916729-07:00","date_modified":"2024-02-27T08:49:45.543424-08:00","sha1":"d4053e7459bf1ae00a58a054b05c3dfa152cf474","page_count":22,"file_size":1377968,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.txnd.382852/gov.uscourts.txnd.382852.1.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.txnd.382852/gov.uscourts.txnd.382852.1.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":"recap-thumbnails/gov.uscourts.txnd.382852/376963938.thumb.1068_1.png","thumbnail_status":1,"plain_text":"     Case 3:23-cv-02426-K Document 1 Filed 11/01/23                Page 1 of 22 PageID 1\n\n\n\n                       IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n                           NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS\n                                 DALLAS DIVISION\n\nKRASIMIR KOLAROV,                                \u00a7\n                                                 \u00a7\nPlaintiff,                                       \u00a7\n                                                 \u00a7\nv.                                               \u00a7   CIVIL ACTION NO. _____________\n                                                 \u00a7\nDALLAS COLLEGE,                                  \u00a7\n                                                 \u00a7\nDefendant.                                       \u00a7\n\n\n                          PLAINTIFF\u2019S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT\n\n       NOW COMES Krasimir Kolorov, Plaintiff in the above-styled and numbered cause\n\n(\u201cPlaintiff\u201d or \u201cMr. Kolorov\u201d), and files this Original Complaint against and complaining of Dallas\n\nCollege, formerly known as Dallas County Community College District, Defendant in the above-\n\nstyled and numbered cause (hereafter referred to as \u201cDefendant\u201d or \u201cDallas College\u201d). Plaintiff\n\nwould respectfully show the Court the following:\n\n                                              I.\n                                         THE PARTIES\n\n       1.      Plaintiff is an individual residing in Dallas County, Texas.\n\n       2.      Defendant is a college or college district organized and existing pursuant to the\n\nlaws of the State of Texas for the purpose of operating a system of community colleges or\n\ncampuses in and around Dallas County, Texas. Also, Defendant is a \u201cstate actor\u201d within the\n\nmeaning of applicable law and the actions complained of herein comprise \u201cstate action.\u201d The\n\naddress of Defendant\u2019s administrative office is 1601 Botham Jean Blvd., Dallas, Dallas County,\n\nTexas 75215. Defendant may be served with process by serving its Chancellor, Dr. Justin Lonan,\n\nat the foregoing address pursuant to the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.\n\n\n\n\nPLAINTIFF\u2019S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT                                                PAGE 1 OF 10\n\f    Case 3:23-cv-02426-K Document 1 Filed 11/01/23                   Page 2 of 22 PageID 2\n\n\n\n                                             II.\n                                  JURISDICTION AND VENUE\n\n       3.        This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a7 1331 and 1367;\n\nthe provisions of 42 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a7 1981, 1983, and 1988; Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42\n\nU.S.C. \u00a7 2000e et seq., as well as under the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution.\n\n       4.        Venue is proper in this district and division pursuant to 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 1391(b), as all\n\nor part of Plaintiff\u2019s claims accrued in Dallas County, Texas, which is within this District and\n\nDivision.\n\n                                                 III.\n\n                                   FACTUAL BACKGROUND\n\n       5.        Plaintiff Krasimir (\u201cKrasi\u201d) Kolorov was an employee of Dallas College (formerly\n\nknown as Dallas County Community College District) for approximately fifteen years, serving as\n\na coach, athletic director, and adjunct faculty member. At the time Dallas College terminated his\n\nfull-time employment in October 2023, Plaintiff was athletic director for Dallas College\u2019s Cedar\n\nValley campus, as well as assistant coach of Cedar Valley\u2019s women\u2019s soccer and women\u2019s\n\nvolleyball teams. In addition, for no additional salary, he was Director of E-Sports for all seven\n\ncampuses of Dallas College. His adjunct teaching position has not been terminated, but it is a part-\n\ntime position.\n\n       6.        During his tenure at Dallas College, Plaintiff served under three different\n\nsupervisors and his performance reviews have all shown that he met or exceeded expectations.\n\nOver the years, he moved from staff to administrator. Under Dallas College policies,\n\nadministrators, as well as faculty, are contract employees. Dallas College Policy DD(LOCAL). As\n\nan administrator, Plaintiff was entitled to written contracts, renewed automatically unless he was\n\ninformed otherwise. Dallas College Policy DCA(LOCAL).\n\n\n\nPLAINTIFF\u2019S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT                                                PAGE 2 OF 10\n\f    Case 3:23-cv-02426-K Document 1 Filed 11/01/23                 Page 3 of 22 PageID 3\n\n\n\n       7.       In violation of its own policies, Dallas College has failed to compensate Mr.\n\nKolarov as an administrator, which it has admitted in its notice of termination, attached hereto as\n\nExhibit \u201cA\u201d. According to Dallas College, by improperly classifying Plaintiff, the College now\n\nowes him $7,728.28 in accrued but unpaid business and travel allowances and vacation leave.\n\nHowever, Dallas College refuses to pay such amount unless Plaintiff executes a full release of\n\nDallas College. See Confidential Separation Agreement and General Release, attached hereto as\n\nExhibit \u201cB.\u201d\n\n       8.       In terminating Plaintiff, who at all relevant times has been an administrator as a\n\nmatter of law and according to Defendant\u2019s policies, Dallas College failed to afford him due\n\nprocess. Because he was an administrator, Plaintiff had a constitutionally protected property\n\ninterest in his employment contract. By depriving him of such property interest without due\n\nprocess, Dallas College violated his rights under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States\n\nConstitution.\n\n       9.       Further, Plaintiff was subject to discrimination by Dallas College based on his race\n\nand his sex. Specifically, he applied for two positions within Dallas College at the end of 2022 and\n\nin early 2023, but was denied those jobs because the college wanted to fill the positions with\n\nwomen, in one case with an African-American woman.\n\n       10.      In December 2022, Plaintiff, who is a Caucasian male, applied for the position of\n\nwomen\u2019s soccer coach at Dallas College\u2019s Richland campus, and in April 2023 he applied for the\n\nposition of Athletic Director of Dallas College\u2019s Brookhaven campus.\n\n       11.      Regarding the Richland campus coaching position, he was asked in January 2023\n\nby Sadiaa Jones, \u201cAre you sure you want to interview?\u201d Ms. Jones, Dallas College\u2019s Director of\n\nAthletics, told him that they already had very strong female candidates, and \u201cwe want a female.\u201d\n\n\n\n\nPLAINTIFF\u2019S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT                                               PAGE 3 OF 10\n\f     Case 3:23-cv-02426-K Document 1 Filed 11/01/23                 Page 4 of 22 PageID 4\n\n\n\nThat position was filled with a Caucasian female.\n\n        12.     When Plaintiff applied for the Athletic Director position at the Brookhaven campus,\n\nhe interviewed with a four-member committee, but again Sadiaa Jones told him, \u201cYou know what\n\nwe are looking for,\u201d and he did not get a final interview. That position was filled with an African\n\nAmerican female.\n\n        13.     In August 2023, Plaintiff told Ms. Jones that with his duties as Cedar Valley\n\ncampus\u2019 Athletic Director, and coaching volleyball and soccer (which also required him to drive\n\nthe team bus), he could not continue to be Director of E-Sports for all seven campuses.\n\n        14.     On October 20, 2023, Plaintiff received notice that his position would be terminated\n\neffective October 31, 2023, but that he was relieved of his duties effective immediately. No due\n\nprocess hearing was offered, nor was Plaintiff presented with the specific charges against him, or\n\ngiven any meaningful opportunity to refute such charges.\n\n                                            IV.\n                                     CAUSES OF ACTION\n\n        15.     Alternative Pleadings, and Incorporation of Factual Background. To the extent\n\nnecessary, each of the claims set forth below is pleaded in the alternative. Further, to the extent\n\nnecessary, all allegations set forth above in the Factual Background section of this Complaint are\n\nhereby referenced and fully incorporated in each of the claims below by this specific reference, as\n\nthough set forth in full.\n\n        16.     Deprivation of Due Process, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 1983. At all times\n\nrelevant hereto, Defendant was/is a college or college district existing under the laws of the State\n\nof Texas, and therefore a State actor, acting at all times relevant hereto under color of law.\n\n        17.     42 U.S.C. \u00a7 1983 prohibits Defendant from depriving Plaintiff of his rights,\n\nprivileges, and/or immunities secured under the United States Constitution. All of the wrongful\n\n\n\nPLAINTIFF\u2019S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT                                                PAGE 4 OF 10\n\f     Case 3:23-cv-02426-K Document 1 Filed 11/01/23                  Page 5 of 22 PageID 5\n\n\n\nconduct by Defendant, as described above, is a result of the policies of Dallas College, as written\n\nand/or as applied to Plaintiff. Additionally, all of the wrongful conduct described herein was\n\ncaused by policymakers of Defendant, including its Chancellor, or, alternatively, by Jones as the\n\ndesignee of the Chancellor or Defendant\u2019s Board of Trustees, and such conduct was sanctioned,\n\nthrough action and/or inaction, by Defendant\u2019s Board of Trustees and others, all singularly or\n\ncollectively acting as policymakers for Defendant in this case. Alternatively, the termination of\n\nPlaintiff in this fashion was delegated by Defendant\u2019s Board of Trustees to Defendant\u2019s\n\nChancellor, who designated it to Jones or through others to Jones, each of them, and all of them\n\ncollectively, acting as policymakers for Defendant in this case.\n\n       18.      As set forth above, Defendant deprived and/or improperly diminished Plaintiff\u2019s\n\nright to procedural due process, as secured by the Fourteenth Amendments to the United States\n\nConstitution.\n\n       19.      Defendant violated Plaintiff\u2019s right to procedural due process by failing and/or\n\nrefusing to conduct, or even attempt to conduct, a thorough and timely investigation into the\n\nallegations and accusations made against Plaintiff that formed the basis of his termination, and\n\nsuch failure and/or refusal included not questioning or interviewing Plaintiff. Defendant never\n\nprovided Plaintiff with the reasons he was being terminated before terminating him, in violation\n\nof Plaintiff\u2019s constitutional rights. Defendant has deprived Plaintiff of his property right in his\n\nemployment without providing Plaintiff any procedural due process as required by the Fourteenth\n\nAmendment. Plaintiff had a \u201clegitimate claim of entitlement\u201d in his continued employment as an\n\nadministrator, based on the provisions of Defendant\u2019s written policies with regard to administrators\n\nas contract employees. See Perry v. Sinderman, 408 U.S. 593, 602 (1972). \u201cA person\u2019s interest in\n\na benefit is a property interest for due process purposes if there are such rules or mutually explicit\n\n\n\n\nPLAINTIFF\u2019S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT                                                PAGE 5 OF 10\n\f     Case 3:23-cv-02426-K Document 1 Filed 11/01/23                   Page 6 of 22 PageID 6\n\n\n\nunderstandings that support [his] claim of entitlement to the benefit and that [he] may invoke at a\n\nhearing.\u201d Id. at 601 (citations and internal quotations omitted).\n\n        20.     Plaintiff had a reasonable expectation that his employment would not be terminated\n\nfor the reasons set forth in the letter he received. The only disciplinary event cited in the letter was\n\nfrom April 2022 \u2013 eighteen months prior to the termination. Plaintiff had continued to perform his\n\nduties, under the oral and/or written employment contract between himself and Defendant. He was\n\nnever informed that his contract had not been renewed.\n\n        21.     Defendant\u2019s actions deprived Plaintiff of his property interest in his employment\n\ncontract. Additionally or alternatively, Defendant violated Plaintiff\u2019s right to procedural due\n\nprocess by failing and/or refusing to provide Plaintiff with a full due process hearing prior to his\n\ntermination, depriving and/or improperly diminishing Plaintiff\u2019s protected property interest in his\n\nongoing employment contract, his performance thereof, and his rights thereunder. Defendant\n\nimpinged, deprived, and/or improperly diminished all of Plaintiff\u2019s foregoing protected interest\n\nand freedoms without due process of law.\n\n        22.     Additionally or alternatively, Defendant violated Plaintiff\u2019s right to procedural due\n\nprocess by preventing him from any meaningful opportunity to be heard. Defendant failed and/or\n\nrefused to provide Plaintiff with the minimal procedural due process and/or the procedural redress\n\nsystem incorporated into Dallas College\u2019s policies, procedures, guidelines, rules, practices and/or\n\nregulations, effectively denying Plaintiff the due process rights to which he was entitled, thus,\n\nviolating his right to procedural due process guaranteed by the United States Constitution.\n\n        23.     In the alternative, Defendant\u2019s actions and/or conduct further constitute a\n\ndeprivation of due process, as each and all of the above acts and/or omissions were made in\n\nrecognition of, as a part of, and/or as a result of the policies, practices, and/or customs of\n\n\n\n\nPLAINTIFF\u2019S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT                                                  PAGE 6 OF 10\n\f     Case 3:23-cv-02426-K Document 1 Filed 11/01/23                    Page 7 of 22 PageID 7\n\n\n\nDefendant, created by or through policymakers and/or persons to whom Defendant effectively\n\ndelegated policymaking authority.\n\n        24.     Defendant\u2019s conduct constitutes violations of Plaintiff\u2019s rights to procedural and\n\nsubstantive due process. As a result of Defendant\u2019s conduct, Plaintiff has been injured and/or\n\ndamaged. Accordingly, Plaintiff seeks to recover his damages from Defendant, including, without\n\nlimitation, loss of income and benefits, mental anguish and nominal damages, and to recover any\n\nand all other remedies afforded and/or available under law and/or in equity, including but not\n\nlimited to injunctive relief, equitable relief, and his attorneys\u2019 fees and costs.\n\n        25.     Breach of Contract. As set forth above, Defendant breached Plaintiff\u2019s\n\nemployment contracts and/or agreement, including Dallas College\u2019s own policies, by failing\n\nand/or refusing to abide by and/or comply with the terms thereof, including without limitation,\n\nfailing to correctly reflect Plaintiff\u2019s administrator status in its internal classification system, so as\n\nto deprive him of his business and travel allowance and vacation pay. Dallas College\u2019s initial\n\nfailure to pay these amounts breached its contract with Plaintiff, and its current refusal to pay such\n\namounts unless Plaintiff executes a global release is a further violation of Dallas College\u2019s\n\ncontractual obligations to Plaintiff. Both by withholding such funds, in at least the amount of\n\n$7,728,28, and through its wrongful termination of Plaintiff, and its discrimination against\n\nPlaintiff, Dallas College has breached its contract with Plaintiff. As the direct and proximate result\n\nof the breaches of Defendant, Plaintiff has sustained damages for which he here sues.\n\n        26.     Federal and State Law Discrimination Claims. Plaintiff sues for discrimination\n\nbased on his race, pursuant to 42 U.S.C \u00a7 1981. Further, plaintiff intends to timely dual-file a\n\ncharge of discrimination in employment against Dallas College, in administrative proceedings with\n\nthe Texas Workforce Commission Civil Rights Division and the Equal Employment Opportunity\n\n\n\n\nPLAINTIFF\u2019S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT                                                   PAGE 7 OF 10\n\f     Case 3:23-cv-02426-K Document 1 Filed 11/01/23                  Page 8 of 22 PageID 8\n\n\n\nCommission, in which he will assert that he was treated in a disparate and discriminatory manner\n\ndue to his sex or gender, as well as race, in violation of federal and state law (including Title VII\n\nof the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the Texas Labor Code). Once he has exhausted his administrative\n\nremedies with respect to his state and federal law discrimination claims, upon receipt of his right\n\nto sue letter(s), from the Texas Workforce Commission and/or from the EEOC, Plaintiff will seek\n\nleave to amend this Complaint to add his claim for discrimination in hiring by Dallas College\n\nunder Title VII and/or the Texas Labor Code. The conduct of Dallas College in refusing to consider\n\nhim for positions set aside for applicants who are females, and preferably African American\n\nfemales, has caused Plaintiff damages for which he here sues.\n\n                                             V.\n                                      REQUESTED RELIEF\n\n       27.     As the direct and/or proximate result of the actions of Defendant complained of\n\nherein, Plaintiff has been damaged and seeks recovery of the full measure of relief and damages\n\nagainst Defendant, including but not limited to actual and/or economic damages, compensatory\n\ndamages, and all other equitable and injunctive relief which may be available to him, including, if\n\napplicable, injunctive relief and/or equitable relief requiring Defendant to provide him with a full\n\ndue process hearing, reinstatement, or assignment to one of the positions he was denied.\n\n                                             VI.\n                                 FEES, COSTS, AND INTEREST\n\n       28.     Plaintiff has retained the law firm of Hill Gilstrap, P.C. to represent him in\n\nconnection with this matter, and has agreed to pay such firm for its such reasonable and necessary\n\nservices. In addition to and without waiving and/or limiting any other relief requested herein,\n\nPlaintiff is entitled to and seeks to recover his reasonable and necessary attorneys\u2019 fees and costs\n\nincurred and to be incurred in bringing this suit and in all appeals of this suit, as permitted by law,\n\n\n\n\nPLAINTIFF\u2019S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT                                                 PAGE 8 OF 10\n\f     Case 3:23-cv-02426-K Document 1 Filed 11/01/23                  Page 9 of 22 PageID 9\n\n\n\nin equity, and/or pursuant Chapters 38 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, and 42\n\nUSC \u00a7 1988(b)-(c).\n\n        29.     Plaintiff further seeks to recover costs of court, along with pre-judgment and post-\n\njudgment interest at the maximum rate permitted by law.\n\n                                            VII.\n                                   CONDITIONS PRECEDENT\n\n        30.     All conditions precedent to the relief being sought by Plaintiff in this matter have\n\nbeen performed, have occurred, and/or have been waived.\n\n\n                                           VIII.\n                                   DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL\n\n        31.     Pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff requests a\n\njury trial, and has or will tender the requisite fee.\n\n                                               PRAYER\n\n        WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Plaintiff prays that upon final hearing,\n\nPlaintiff recover judgment against Defendant and be awarded:\n\n        (1)     any and all amounts recoverable and/or recognizable as damages under law and/or\n                in equity, resulting and/or occasioned by the wrongful acts and/or conduct of\n                Defendant (as set forth above more specifically);\n\n        (2)     his litigation expenses and costs, including but not limited to his reasonable and\n                necessary attorneys\u2019 fees and costs and any applicable expert fees;\n\n        (3)     pre-judgment and post-judgment interest at the maximum rate permitted by law;\n\n        (4)     costs of court;\n\n        (5)     such other and further relief, both general and special, at law and in equity, to which\n                Plaintiff may show himself to be justly entitled.\n\n\n\n\nPLAINTIFF\u2019S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT                                                 PAGE 9 OF 10\n\f   Case 3:23-cv-02426-K Document 1 Filed 11/01/23     Page 10 of 22 PageID 10\n\n\n\n                                   Respectfully submitted,\n\n\n                                          /s/ Frank Hill\n                                   Frank Hill                 09632000\n                                   fhill@hillgilstrap.com\n                                   Stefanie Klein             11565650\n                                   sklein@hillgilstrap.com\n\n\n                                   HILL GILSTRAP, P.C.\n                                   1400 West Abram Street\n                                   Arlington, Texas 76013\n                                   (817) 261-2222\n                                   (817) 861-4685 Facsimile\n\n                                   ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF\n\n\n\n\nPLAINTIFF\u2019S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT                                PAGE 10 OF 10\n\fCase 3:23-cv-02426-K Document 1 Filed 11/01/23   Page 11 of 22 PageID 11\n\n\n\n\n                       Exhibit A\n\fCase 3:23-cv-02426-K Document 1 Filed 11/01/23   Page 12 of 22 PageID 12\n\fCase 3:23-cv-02426-K Document 1 Filed 11/01/23   Page 13 of 22 PageID 13\n\fCase 3:23-cv-02426-K Document 1 Filed 11/01/23   Page 14 of 22 PageID 14\n\n\n\n\n                       Exhibit B\n\fCase 3:23-cv-02426-K Document 1 Filed 11/01/23   Page 15 of 22 PageID 15\n\fCase 3:23-cv-02426-K Document 1 Filed 11/01/23   Page 16 of 22 PageID 16\n\fCase 3:23-cv-02426-K Document 1 Filed 11/01/23   Page 17 of 22 PageID 17\n\fCase 3:23-cv-02426-K Document 1 Filed 11/01/23   Page 18 of 22 PageID 18\n\fCase 3:23-cv-02426-K Document 1 Filed 11/01/23   Page 19 of 22 PageID 19\n\fCase 3:23-cv-02426-K Document 1 Filed 11/01/23   Page 20 of 22 PageID 20\n\fCase 3:23-cv-02426-K Document 1 Filed 11/01/23   Page 21 of 22 PageID 21\n\fCase 3:23-cv-02426-K Document 1 Filed 11/01/23   Page 22 of 22 PageID 22\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2023-11-06T06:00:29.816891-08:00","document_number":"1","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"177016383716","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Complaint","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2023-11-01T15:24:54.905533-07:00","date_modified":"2024-02-27T08:49:45.503229-08:00","date_filed":"2023-11-01","time_filed":"17:06:12","entry_number":1,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-11-01.001","pacer_sequence_number":6,"description":"COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Dallas College filed by Krasimir Kolarov. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number ATXNDC-14145334) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the Judges Copy Requirements and Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Hill, Frank) (Entered: 11/01/2023)","tags":[]}],"entries_total":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/?count=on&docket=67937090&page_size=40"}