{"cached_at":"2026-10-23T10:44:29.797350+00:00","cl_docket_id":"67922478","docket":{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67922478/","id":67922478,"court":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/courts/txnd/","court_id":"txnd","original_court_info":null,"idb_data":null,"clusters":["https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/clusters/10890337/"],"audio_files":[],"assigned_to":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/people/1782/","referred_to":null,"bankruptcy_information":null,"absolute_url":"/docket/67922478/smith-v-united-states/","date_created":"2023-10-27T13:22:53.967242-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-02T19:47:58.677089-07:00","source":1,"appeal_from_str":"","assigned_to_str":"Ed Kinkeade","referred_to_str":"","panel_str":"","date_last_index":"2023-11-27T11:37:00.672964-08:00","date_cert_granted":null,"date_cert_denied":null,"date_argued":null,"date_reargued":null,"date_reargument_denied":null,"date_filed":"2023-10-13","date_terminated":null,"date_last_filing":"2026-04-14","case_name_short":"","case_name":"Smith v. United States","case_name_full":"","slug":"smith-v-united-states","docket_number":"3:23-cv-02338","docket_number_core":"2302338","docket_number_raw":"3:23-cv-02338","docket_number_source":0,"federal_dn_office_code":"3","federal_dn_case_type":"cv","federal_dn_judge_initials_assigned":"K","federal_dn_judge_initials_referred":"","federal_defendant_number":null,"pacer_case_id":"382555","cause":"28:2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence","nature_of_suit":"Prisoner Pet: Motions to Vacate Sentence","jury_demand":"","jurisdiction_type":"","appellate_fee_status":"","appellate_case_type_information":"","mdl_status":"","filepath_ia":"","filepath_ia_json":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"ia_needs_upload":true,"ia_date_first_change":"2023-10-27T13:22:53.956108-07:00","date_blocked":null,"blocked":false,"appeal_from":null,"parent_docket":null,"tags":[],"panel":[]},"parties":[],"entries":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/460777671/","id":460777671,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67922478/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/475847433/","id":475847433,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67922478/19/smith-v-united-states/","date_created":"2026-04-14T15:07:51.224080-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-03T17:11:10.395681-07:00","sha1":"c02a06be6c87a2a2261a71b56d32719c00fdc30a","page_count":6,"file_size":107887,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.txnd.382555/gov.uscourts.txnd.382555.19.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.txnd.382555/gov.uscourts.txnd.382555.19.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":" Case 3:23-cv-02338-K     Document 19     Filed 04/14/26    Page 1 of 6    PageID 68\n\n\n\n                  IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n                  FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS\n                            DALLAS DIVISION\n\nCORDELL VICTOR JEROME SMITH,              \u00a7\n#58759-177,                               \u00a7\n           Movant,                        \u00a7\n                                          \u00a7   CIVIL NO. 3:23-CV-2338-K\nv.                                        \u00a7   (CRIMINAL NO. 3:19-CR-187-K-1)\n                                          \u00a7\nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                 \u00a7\n         Respondent.                      \u00a7\n\n                   MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER\n\n      Movant Cordell Victor Jerome Smith filed a Motion Under 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255 to\n\nVacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (Doc. 1). For the\n\nreasons detailed herein, Smith\u2019s motion is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED\n\nWITH PREJUDICE.\n\n                                I. BACKGROUND\n\n      Smith challenges his 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 924(c) federal convictions and sentences in\n\nCause No. 3:19-CR-187-K-1.       The respondent is the United States of America\n\n(\u201cGovernment\u201d).\n\nA. Conviction and Sentencing\n\n      After being charged with 16 counts in a multi-defendant, 16-count indictment,\n\nSmith pled guilty under a plea agreement to two counts of interference with\n\ncommerce by robbery and aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a7 1951(a)\n\nand 2 (\u201cCounts 4 and 14\u201d), and two counts of using, carrying, brandishing, and\n\ndischarging a firearm during and in relation to, and possessing, brandishing, and\n\n\n                                     Page 1 of 6\n\f Case 3:23-cv-02338-K     Document 19     Filed 04/14/26    Page 2 of 6    PageID 69\n\n\n\ndischarging a firearm in furtherance of, a crime of violence, and aiding and abetting,\n\nin violation of 18 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a7 924(c)(1)(A)(iii) and 2 (\u201cCounts 5 and 15\u201d). See Crim.\n\nDocs. 1, 83, 98.    Among other provisions, Smith\u2019s plea agreement contained an\n\nappeal and collateral review waiver. See Crim. Doc. 83 at 7. In that waiver, Smith\n\nwaived his right to appeal his convictions and sentences and his right to otherwise\n\ncontest his convictions and sentences in a collateral proceeding, including under\n\nSection 2255, except that he reserved the right (a) to bring a direct appeal of a\n\nsentence exceeding the statutory maximum punishment or an arithmetic error at\n\nsentencing, (b) to challenge the voluntariness of any of his guilty pleas or the appeal\n\nand collateral review waiver, and (c) to bring a claim of ineffective assistance of\n\ncounsel. See id.\n\n      At his re-arraignment on June 2, 2020, Smith acknowledged under oath that\n\nhe understood the rights he was giving up by pleading guilty, and that he was waiving\n\nhis right to appeal or otherwise challenge his convictions or sentences except in the\n\nlimited circumstances of directly appealing a sentence that exceeds the statutory\n\nmaximum or math errors at sentencing, challenging the voluntariness of his guilty\n\nplea or the appeal and collateral review waiver, and bringing a claim of ineffective\n\nassistance of counsel. See Crim. Doc. 344 at 11-13, 22. Smith further acknowledged\n\nthat he voluntarily and freely entered into the plea agreement, and that aside from\n\nwhat was contained in his plea documents, no one made any other promise or\n\nassurance to him of any kind to get him to plead guilty. See id. at 23. The Court\n\n\n\n                                     Page 2 of 6\n\f Case 3:23-cv-02338-K      Document 19    Filed 04/14/26     Page 3 of 6   PageID 70\n\n\n\nfound that his guilty pleas were knowing and voluntary. See id. at 26-27; Crim Docs.\n\n99, 109.\n\n      By judgment dated October 5, 2022, the Court sentenced Smith to a total\n\nimprisonment term of 260 months, comprised of 20 months on each of Counts 4 and\n\n14, to run concurrent with each other, and 120 months on each of Counts 5 and 15,\n\nto run consecutive to each other and consecutive to the terms imposed on Counts 4\n\nand 14. See Crim. Doc. 274. His imprisonment is to be followed by three years of\n\nsupervised release. See id. Smith did not appeal the judgment.\n\nB. Substantive Claim\n\n      Smith timely filed this Section 2255 motion on October 13, 2023, and\n\nasserted one ground for relief:\n\n      I believe one of my 924(c)(iii) counts should be vacated due to 3553(a)\n      sentencing disparity. My cocon[s]pirator Freddie Lee Valentine pled\n      guilty to the same charges as me and rec[ei]ved just about 10 years less\n      than me. Which show[s] a huge sentence difference. We would both\n      have around the same time if my 924(c)(iii) were to get vacated, or just\n      simply was ran consecutive with my other 924(c)(iii) count.\n\nDoc. 1 at 4 (capitalization altered). The Government filed a response on February\n\n26, 2024. See Doc. 11. Smith did not file a reply.\n\n                      II. SCOPE OF RELIEF UNDER \u00a7 2255\n\n      After conviction and exhaustion or waiver of the right to direct appeal, the\n\nCourt presumes that a defendant has been fairly and finally convicted. United States\n\nv. Cervantes, 132 F.3d 1106, 1109 (5th Cir. 1998) (citing United States v. Shaid, 937\n\nF.2d 228, 231-32 (5th Cir. 1991) (en banc)).         Post-conviction \u201c[r]elief under 28\n\n\n                                     Page 3 of 6\n\f Case 3:23-cv-02338-K      Document 19      Filed 04/14/26    Page 4 of 6    PageID 71\n\n\n\nU.S.C. \u00a7 2255 is reserved for transgressions of constitutional rights and for a narrow\n\nrange of injuries that could not have been raised on direct appeal and would, if\n\ncondoned, result in a complete miscarriage of justice.\u201d United States v. Gaudet, 81 F.3d\n\n585, 589 (5th Cir. 1996) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted); see also\n\nUnited States v. Willis, 273 F.3d 592, 595 (5th Cir. 2001) (\u201cA defendant can challenge\n\na final conviction, but only on issues of constitutional or jurisdictional magnitude.\u201d).\n\n                                     III. WAIVER\n\n      In his only ground for relief, Smith contends that, because of a sentencing\n\ndisparity between his aggregate sentence and the lower aggregate sentence of a co-\n\ndefendant, the Court should vacate one of his \u00a7 924(c) sentences or run his two\n\n\u00a7 924(c) sentences concurrent with each other. See Doc. 1 at 4, 13. The Government\n\nargues that his claim is barred by the collateral review waiver in his plea agreement,\n\nprocedurally defaulted, and meritless. See Doc. 11 at 5-6.\n\n      The plea agreement waiver in this case bars all claims on collateral review\n\nunder Section 2255, except for those that go to the voluntariness of Smith\u2019s guilty\n\nplea or the appeal waiver and the ineffectiveness of counsel. See Doc. 83 at 7. Smith\n\ndoes not challenge the voluntariness of his guilty plea or the collateral review waiver,\n\nnor does he contend in his claim that counsel rendered ineffective assistance.\n\nAccordingly, even if the Court assumes arguendo that Smith\u2019s claim is cognizable\n\nunder Section 2255, it is barred by his informed and voluntary collateral review\n\nwaiver.\n\n\n\n                                      Page 4 of 6\n\f Case 3:23-cv-02338-K      Document 19     Filed 04/14/26    Page 5 of 6      PageID 72\n\n\n\n      The Court notes that the Fifth Circuit recognizes exceptions to an informed\n\nand voluntary plea agreement waiver where ineffective assistance of counsel claims\n\naffecting the validity of the collateral review waiver or guilty plea are involved, and\n\n\u201c\u2018where the sentence facially (or perhaps indisputably) exceeds the statutory limits.\u2019\u201d\n\nUnited States v. Hollins, 97 F. App\u2019x 477, 479 (5th Cir. 2004) (quoting United States v.\n\nWhite, 307 F.3d 335, 343 n.4 (5th Cir. 2002)). These exceptions are inapplicable\n\nhere; Smith does not claim that his counsel was ineffective in any way that affected\n\nthe validity of his collateral review waiver or guilty plea, and he does not allege that\n\nany of his sentences exceeded the applicable statutory maximum. He therefore has\n\nfailed to show that an exception to his plea agreement waiver applies.\n\n      Because Smith\u2019s claim is barred by the knowing and voluntary collateral review\n\nwaiver in his plea agreement, and because he has failed to show that any exception to\n\nthat waiver applies, he is not entitled to Section 2255 relief on his claim. The Court\n\ntherefore denies Smith\u2019s sole claim on this basis.     Additionally, to the extent the\n\nGovernment argues in the alternative that Smith\u2019s claim is procedurally barred and\n\nwithout merit, the Court does not address these arguments given that Smith\u2019s claim is\n\nbarred by the collateral review waiver in his plea agreement, as discussed.\n\n                           IV. EVIDENTIARY HEARING\n\n      To the extent Smith requests an evidentiary hearing on his claim, an\n\nevidentiary hearing under Section 2255 is not required when \u201cthe motion and the\n\nfiles and records of the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no\n\n\n\n                                      Page 5 of 6\n\f Case 3:23-cv-02338-K      Document 19    Filed 04/14/26    Page 6 of 6   PageID 73\n\n\n\nrelief.\u201d 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255(b). A movant \u201cis entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his\n\n\u00a7 2255 motion only if he presents \u2018independent indicia of the likely merit of [his]\n\nallegations.\u2019\u201d   United States v. Reed, 719 F.3d 369, 373 (5th Cir. 2013) (citation\n\nomitted). Because Smith has failed to present independent indicia in support of the\n\nlikely merit of his claim, he has failed to demonstrate that he is entitled to an\n\nevidentiary hearing.\n\n                                  V. CONCLUSION\n\n       For the foregoing reasons, Smith\u2019s Motion Under 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255 to Vacate, Set\n\nAside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (Doc. 1) is DENIED, and this\n\naction is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.\n\n       SO ORDERED.\n\n       Signed April 14th, 2026.\n\n\n\n\n                                              ____________________________________\n                                              ED KINKEADE\n                                              UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE\n\n\n\n\n                                     Page 6 of 6\n\f","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":"2026-07-02T19:47:58.456215-07:00","document_number":"19","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"177018525834","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":true,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Memorandum Opinion and Order","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-04-14T15:07:51.174403-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-02T19:46:37.322346-07:00","date_filed":"2026-04-14","time_filed":"16:44:12","entry_number":19,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-04-14.001","pacer_sequence_number":72,"description":" MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER -   Movant Cordell Victor Jerome Smith filed a Motion Under 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (Doc. 1). For the reasons detailed herein, Smith's motion is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.    (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 4/14/2026) (chmb)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/460777669/","id":460777669,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67922478/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/475847431/","id":475847431,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67922478/20/smith-v-united-states/","date_created":"2026-04-14T15:07:51.033402-07:00","date_modified":"2026-04-14T15:07:51.049450-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"20","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"177018525857","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Judgment","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-04-14T15:07:50.994479-07:00","date_modified":"2026-04-14T15:07:51.012592-07:00","date_filed":"2026-04-14","time_filed":"16:46:46","entry_number":20,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-04-14.001","pacer_sequence_number":74,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/460777666/","id":460777666,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67922478/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/475847428/","id":475847428,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67922478/21/smith-v-united-states/","date_created":"2026-04-14T15:07:50.669426-07:00","date_modified":"2026-04-14T15:07:50.687428-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"21","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"177018525862","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Certificate of Appealability Denied","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-04-14T15:07:50.623541-07:00","date_modified":"2026-04-14T15:07:50.635777-07:00","date_filed":"2026-04-14","time_filed":"16:47:21","entry_number":21,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-04-14.001","pacer_sequence_number":76,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/400329866/","id":400329866,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67922478/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/409559814/","id":409559814,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67922478/13/smith-v-united-states/","date_created":"2024-08-23T15:02:17.514589-07:00","date_modified":"2024-08-24T02:10:11.290383-07:00","sha1":"7549a908c642b3a11b826c14ec12ddc4e8eb9fb5","page_count":14,"file_size":775708,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.txnd.382555/gov.uscourts.txnd.382555.13.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.txnd.382555/gov.uscourts.txnd.382555.13.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"Case 3:22-cv-01529-N Document 28 Filed 08/23/24 Page 1 of 14. PagelD: 215\" \u00a2 ees\n| TIED\n|\n\nIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT | ,,\nFOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS | <>\nDALLAS DIVISION |\n\nAUG 23 2024\n\nSPECIAL ORDER NO. 3-354\n\nEffective August 23, 2024, the cases listed on Exhibit A to this order are transferred to\nMagistrate Judge Brian McKay and shall henceforth carry the suffix letters \u201cBW.\u201d Magistrate\nJudge McKay shall seek consent of the parties in these cases to conduct all further proceedings\nand order the entry of final judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 636(c). Ifall parties do not\nconsent, Magistrate Judge McKay shall, unless the assigned district judge otherwise orders,\n\nexercise all powers permitted by 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 636(b).\n\nSO ORDERED.\n\nAugust 23, 2024\n\nDect (_ wes\n\nDAVID C. GODBEY\nCHIEF JUDGE\n\n\fCase 3:22-cv-01529-N Document 28 Filed 08/23/24 Page 2of14 PagelD 216\nExhibit A\n\nCASES TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF JUDGE RENEE H. TOLIVER TO JUDGE MCKAY\n\n1 2:24-CV-0142-BK Hasan v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration\n\n2 3:18-CV-1933-N Lexor Manufacturing LLC v. Luraco Ine, et al.\n\n3 3:19-CV-2204-X Retail Ready Career Center inc v. United States of America, et al.\n\n4 3:19-CV-2218-E Southwest Airlines Co v. Liberty Insurance Underwriters Inc\n\n5 3:19-CV-2281-K FTC v. Match Group\n\n6 3:20-CV-0656-K-BK Buzz Photo, et al. v. People's Republic of China, et al.\n\n7 3:20-CV-2935-N Carswell v. Hunt County Texas, et al.\n\n8 3:20-CV-3718-D Samurai Global LLC v. Landmark American Insurance Company\n3:21-CV-0116-B Rainier Arms LLC, et al. v. Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and\n\n9 Explosives, et al.\n\n10 3:21-CV-0840-E TNT Quadrangle Partner, LP, et al. v. SRPF B/Quadrangle Property, LLC, et al.\n\n11 3:21-CV-1764-D Vess v. City of Dallas, et al.\n\n412 3:21-CV-2429-L Raskin, et al. v. Dallas Independent Schoo! District, et al.\n\n13 3:22-CV-0654-N Salt and Light Energy Equipment LLC v. Crigin Bancorp\n\n14 3:22-CV-0663-E United States of America v. All Funds in 199 Bank Accounts Located in India\n\n15 3:22-CV-0780-M State of Texas, et al. v. Biden, et al.\n\n16 3:22-CV-0907-5 Hilltop Holdings Inc v. AlG Specialty Insurance Company\n\n17 3:22-CV-1185-X Sentry Insurance A Mutual Company v. Morgan\n\n18 3:22-CV-1869-E Walsh v. Peterson\n\n19 3:22-CV-2118-X Securities and Exchange Commission v. Barton, et al.\n\n20 3:22-CV-2272-S Thomas v. McDonough, et al.\n\n21 3:22-CV-2597-K Pearson, et al. v. Gage\n\n22 3:22-CV-2624-B Iske v. Precision Dynamics International LLC\n\n23 3:22-CV-2763-E Boy Scouts of America v. Touch A Life Foundation Inc\n\n24 3:22-MC-0079-X-BK NiRB v. LM Carpet\n\n25 3:23-CV-0037-5 Young v. Baylor Scott & White Health\n\n26 3:23-CV-0133-B Endurance American Insurance Company v. Lloyd's Syndicate 3624\n\n27 3:23-CV-0313-S G Thomas Air LLC v. Pratt & Whitney Engine Services Inc\n\n28 3:23-CV-0342-M Ariat International Inc v. Khemchand Handicrafts Limited, et ai.\n\n29 3:23-CV-0464-D Alford v. Wonderland Montessori Academy LLC\n\n30 3:23-CV-0584-G Lee Ir v. United States\n3:23-CV-0640-D M Central Residences Condominium Association Inc v. Technology\n\n31 Insurance Company Inc\n\n32 3:23-CV-0641-L Securities and Exchange Commission v. McKnight\n\n33 3:23-CV-0811-E Alawei v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Service\n\n34 3:23-CV-0881-X GS Holistic LCC v. Sri Manakamana Inc\n\n35 3:23-CV-0910-B Brandon Architects Inc v. Olerio Home LLC\n\n36 3:23-CV-0954-X Lopez v. US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, et al.\n\n37 3:23-CV-0965-X Wilcox v. Equifax Information Services LLC\n\n38 3:23-CV-1171-K Modern Vascular of Southaven LLC, et al. v. Qlarant Integrity Solutions LLC\n\n39 3:23-CV-1198-G White v. American Economy Insurance Company\n\n40 3:23-CV-1351-X $2 Brothers LLC v. AmGuard Insurance Company\n\n41 3:23-CV-1399-G Dill v. Experian Information Solutions Inc\n\n1\n\n\fCase 3:22-cv-01529-N Document 28 Filed 08/23/24 Page 3o0f14 PagelD 217\nExhibit A\n\nCASES TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF JUDGE RENEE H. TOLIVER TO JUDGE MCKAY\n\n42 3:23-CV-1457-5 Denison Glass & Mirror Ine v. EFCO LLC\n\n43 3:23-CV-1559-B Fitton v. Pinnacle Propane LLC\n\n44 3:23-CV-1574-E Johnson, et al. v. Dallas County Hospital District, et al.\n\n45 3:23-CV-1583-E Hernandez v. Brown\n\n46 3:23-CV-1663-D-BK Hill v. Norman, et ai.\n\n47 3:23-CV-1698-L-BK Jaffari v. Garland, et al.\n\n48 3:23-CV-1772-B Uliman v. OBM Miami\n\n49 3:23-CV-1915-B-BK Pinson v. Dallas Cnty. Sherriff\u2019s Office, et al.\n\n50 3:23-CV-1918-N Martinez v. Kroger\n3:23-CV-1945-D-BK Thornton v. Dallas County d/b/a Dallas County District Attorney's Office, et\n\n51 al.\n\n52 3:23-CV-2088-L-BK Gordon v. Kellam\n\n53 3:23-CV-2090-N-BK Tyson v. Commissioner of Social Security\n\n54 3:23-CV-2094-N-BK Humble v. Enge, et al.\n\n55 3:23-CV-2112-D King v. SeaHarbor Insurance Agency LLC\n\n56 3:23-CV-2162-5 Sealed v. Sealed\n\n57 3:23-CV-2195-X-BK Ashley v. DOL\n\n58 3:23-CV-2212-B Hunter v. Procollect Inc\n\n59 3:23-CV-2231-5 82 Glenwood Avenue LLC v. Schutze, et al.\n\n60 3:23-CV-2385-BK Fernandez v. Social Security Administration\n\n61 3:23-CV-2412-D Beasley v. Castle Credit Co Holdings LLC\n\n62 3:23-CV-2438-N-BK Blanks v, Federal Correctional Institution Seagoville, et al.\n\n63 3:23-CV-2493-K-BK Dickerson v. Conduent Commercial! Solutions LLC\n\n64 3:23-CV-2656-K-BK United States of America v. Rehab 4 Work Services LLC, et al.\n\n65 3:23-CV-2728-B Factor Mutual Insurance Company v. Southwest Pumps LLC, et al.\n\n66 3:24-CV-0013-B SW Marine v. Valentine\n\n67 3:24-CV-0072-E Katz v. Gruenberg, et al.\n\n68 3:24-CV-0104-E Tupac v. Asbury Automotive Group Inc, et al.\n\n69 3:24-CV-0112-E-BK Keys v. Connors et al.\n\n70 3:24-CV-0113-K-BK Smith v. Federai Bureau of Prisons, et al.\n\n71 3:24-CV-0148-B Samiappan v. Su\n\n72 3:24-CV-0244-N Sukin v. Experian Information Soiutions Inc, et al.\n\n73 3:24-CV-0298-G Liu v. U.S. Department of State, et ai.\n\n74 3:24-CV-0376-X Colonna, et al. v. LoanDepot.com LLC\n\n75 3:24-CV-0626-S-BK Alfano v. Allred Unit Mailroom\n\n76 3:24-CV-1060-L-BK Butler v. Lee at al\n\n77 3:24-CV-1063-D Rodriguez v. ALDI Inc\n\n78 3:24-CV-1083-K G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC v. Frida's Tacos LLC, et al.\n\n79 3:24-CV-1089-X Feit Electric Company Inc v. Elong international USA Inc, et al.\n\n80 3:24-CV-1117-K Umoru v. Walmart Stores Texas LLC\n\n81 3:24-CV-1149-X-BK Central States Health and Welfare Fund v. Contreras\n3:24-CV-1151-X Dallas Food & Beverage LLC, et al. v. United States Smail Business\n\n82 Administration, et al.\n\n83 3:24-CV-1245-B Sealed v. Sealed\n\n84 3:24-CV-1367-S Jain, et al. v. Jaddou\n\n85 3:24-CV-1416-G-BK Henderson v. Trump\n\n\fCase 3:22-cv-01529-N Document 28 Filed 08/23/24 Page 4of14 PagelD 218\n\nExhibit A\n\nCASES TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF JUDGE RENEE H. TOLIVER TO JUDGE MCKAY\n\n86 3:24-CV-1422-5 Kearney v. Equifax Information Services LLC\n\n87 3:24-CV-1551-B Zachary v. Environmental Protection Agency\n\n88 3:24-CV-1587-S-BK Henderson v. Trump\n\n89 3:24-CV-1621-G Hamilton v. Walmart Inc\n\n90 3:24-CV-1677-X EYM Pizza of Georgia LLC, et al. v. Pizza Hut LLC, et al.\n\n91 3:24-CV-1705-D Ogboru v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company\n92 3:24-MC-0017-E NFinity IP v. Varsity Spirit\n\n93 4:24-CV-0592-BK Johnson v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration\n\n94 5:23-CV-0259-BK Arguello v. Social Security Administration\n\n95 5:23-CV-0281-BK Murphy v. Social Security Administration\n\n\fCase 3:22-cv-01529-N Document 28 Filed 08/23/24 Page5of14 PagelD 219\n\nExhibit A\n\nCASES TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF JUDGE DAVID L. HORAN TO JUDGE MCKAY\n\n# Case No. Case Name\n1 3:16-cv-00764-N VidStream LLC v. Twitter Inc\nCapio Funding LLC v. Rural/Metro Operating\n2 3:17-cv-02713-X Company LLC et al\n3 3:19-cv-01067-K Von Colditz v. Woods et af\n4 3:20-cv-00045-D Rodriguez v. Southern Health Partners Inc et al\n5 3:20-cv-00313-N Hamilton et al v. Dallas County\n6 3:20-cv-01358-E Coleman et al v. Brozen et al\n7 3:20-cv-03636-K Blue Yonder Group inc v. Kinaxis inc et al\n8 3:21-cv-01498-B Halperin et al v. Wills et al\n9 3:22-cv-00034-X McClung et al v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC et al\n10 3:22-cv-00141-N-BN Bell v. Moore\nit 3:22-cv-00525-X Fiberco, Inc. v. Acadia Insurance Company\nHighland Capital Management LP et al v. Highland Capital Management Fund\n12 3:22-cv-00789-X Advisors LP\n13 3:22-cv-00794-$ Legacy Exploration LLC v. Optimum Energy Partners LLC et al\n14 3:22-cv-01498-G-BN Timmons v. Director\n45 3:22-cy-01581-G-BN Sharper v. Director, TDCJ-CID\n416 3:22-cv-01600-G-BN Matthews v. Director, TDCJ-CID\n17 3:22-cv-01871-G-BN Turner v. O'Daniel\n18 3:22-cv-02062-X Shuler Drilling Company Inc v. Disiere Partners LLC, et al\n19 3:22-cv-02312-G-BN Mornes v, Director, TDCJ-CID\n20 3:22-cv-02403-N-BN Carey v. Director, TDCJ-CID\n21 3:22-cv-02410-G Castillo v. Walmart Inc et ai\n22 3:22-cv-02589-S-BN Minze v. Director, TOCJ-CID\n23 3:22-cv-02600-X Venzant v. Bigelow Arizona TX-282 LP et al\n24 3:22-cv-02891-N-BN Carcamo v. Director, FDCJ-CID\n25 3:23-cv-00057-K-BN Turner v. Wellpath Med Co\n26 3:23-cv-00066-B-BN Hernandez v. Director, TDCJ-CID\nTrustees of the IBEW-NECA Southwestern Health and Benefit Fund et al v. Rockey\n27 3:23-cv-00224-B Electric Inc\n28 3:23-cv-00280-K Mercury Associates Inc v. Primoris Services Corporation\n29 3:23-cv-00303-N Paige v. State Farm Lloyds\n30 3:23-cv-00337-X-BN Roccaforte v. Transunion\n31 3:23-cv-00338-N-BN Roccaforte v. Experian information Solutions Inc\n32 3:23-cv-00339-E-BN Roccaforte v. Equifax Inc\n33 3:23-cv-00355-X EDN Global Inc et al v. AT&T Mobility Services LUC et al\n34 3:23-cv-G0391-D Walker v. Hoffman et al\n35 3:23-cv-00410-E-BN Lewis v. Equifax\n36 3:23-cv-00435-B-BN Lewis v. Experian\n37 3:23-cv-00508-N Doe v. Backpage.com LLC et al\n38 3:23-cv-00547-K Bilbo v. Central Transport LLC\n39 3:23-cv-00568-B Cunningham v. State Farm Lloyds\n40 3:23-cv-00574-B Martin v. Penske Logistics LLC\n41 3:23-cv-80603-E Bridging Biosciences LLC v, Esch et al\n42 3:23-cv-00668-E-BN Spillman Jr v. Director, TDCI-CID\n43 3:23-cv-00706-E Arka Mesquite Investments LLC et al v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company\n44 3:23-cv-00736-M Powell v. Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana\n45 3:23-cv-00755-M-BN Toliver v. Director, TDCJ-CID\n46 3:23-cv-00772-E-BN Cloninger v. Director, TDC)-CID\n47 3:23-cv-00819-G White v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC\n\n\fCase 3:22-cv-01529-N Document 28 Filed 08/23/24 Page 6\u00e9of14 PagelD 220\n\nExhibit A\n\nCASES TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF JUDGE DAVID L. HORAN TO JUDGE MCKAY\n# Case No. Case Name\n4g 3:23-cv-00844-M Bellinger v. CureWave Lasers LLC et al\n49 3:23-cv-00852-G New York inn Inc et al v, Associated Industries Insurance Company Inc\n50 3:23-cv-00882-L GS Holistic LLC v. B Over 21 Inc et al\n51 3:23-cv-00915-B SMA v. Salesforce et al\n52 3:23-cv-00948-K Eder v. City of Burleson\n53 3:23-cv-00977-5 Brown v. Sarn\u2019s East Inc\n54 3:23-cv-01016-D Johnson v. Epsilon Data Management LLC\n55 3:23-cv-01018-X Licht v. Ling et al\n56 3:23-cv-01024-L GS Holistic LLC v. OMS Investment LLC et al\n57 3:23-cv-01039-B Jone Doe AS v. Salesforce Inc et a!\n58 3:23-cv-01089-N-BN Rountree v, FedEx Ground Package System Inc\n59 3:23-cv-01228-G Garcia v. Fiesta Mart LLC et al\n60 3:23-cv-01230-B Horton et al v. Heppner et al\n61 3:23-cv-01286-E Warner v. Equifax information Services LLC et ai\n62 3:23-cv-01301-X Dheera Limited Company v. Johnson Controls Inc et ai\n63 3:23-cv-01320-N-BN Silvers v. Director, TOCJ-CIB\n64 3:23-cv-01339-E Terri E Newkirk IRA v. Kelly e\u00a2 al\n65 3:23-cv-01345-L Russell v. Kroger Texas, LP\n66 3:23-cv-01356-L-BN Perez v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLC et al\n6&7 3:23-cv-01366-N Husinger v. Smart Start Real estate Corporation\n68 3:23-cv-01376-X Harris v. Papa Texas LLC\n69 3:23-cv-01468-D Nieves v. Uber Technologies Inc et al\n70 3:23-cv-01484-L Red Barn Candle Company ELC v. Bath & Body Works Brand Management Inc\n7t 3:23-cv-01497-L Rittman v. Amguard Insurance Company\n72 3:23-cv-01502-G-BN Cook v. Costco Wholesale Corporation\n73 3:23-cv-01503-B Charitable DAF Fund LP et al v. Highland Capital Management LP\n74 3:23-cv-01517-N Bahamas Laguna Azure LLC v. City of Royse City, Texas\n75 3:23-cv-01525-X Biovant LLC v. BTEAG LLC et al\n76 3:23-cv-01548-5 Cobbs v. Baylor Scott & White\n77 3:23-cv-01557-D Clark v. Wyndham Worldwide, Inc\n78 3:23-cv-01561-K Erwin et al v. Metalcraft of Mayville Inc\n79 3:23-cv-01565-S-BN Fields v. Kelley\n80 3:23-cv-01617-X Holmes v. Equifax information Services LLC et al\n81 3:23-cv-01621-5 Niter et al v. Brown et al\n82 3:23-cv-01669-B Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe\n83 3:23-cv-01674-B Brookfield Property Retail Holdings LLC et ai v. Dillard Texas Central LLC\n84 3:23-cv-01675-L Van-Zandt Reiss et al v. The Bank of New York Melon\n&5 3:23-cv-01679-E Harris v. HireRight LLC\n86 3:23-cv-01775-X Palmer v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc\n87 3:23-cv-01791-L SPBL-1119 LLC v. Arciterra Strategic Retail Advisor LLC et al\n8&8 3:23-cv-01793-L LSM Blue Sky LLC v. AT Olathe Outlot 5 LLC et al\n89 3:23-cv-01802-E Megehee v. Pallida LLC\n90 3:23-cv-01805-E McConnell v. Applied Digital Corporation et al\n91 3:23-cv-01832-8 Doe v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit et al\n92 3:23-cv-01870-K GS Holistic LLC v. GNS Sons Inc\n93 3:23-cv-01889-S Velis v. Bangert et al\n94 3:23-cv-01910-E Hagans v. Child Care Group\n95 3:23-cv-01912-S Lessig v. Fiesta Mart LLC\n96 3:23-cv-01937-N Kustom Signals Inc v. Applied Concepts Inc\n97 3:23-cv-01972-L Owens v. Dallas Country Club\n98 3:23-cv-01973-K-BN Bohemond v. City of Dallas TX\n99 3:23-cv-01998-B Harland v. Workforce outsource Services Inc\n\n5\n\fCase 3:22-cv-01529-N Document 28 Filed 08/23/24 Page 7of14 PagelD 221\n\nExhibit A\nCASES TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF JUDGE DAVID L. HORAN TO JUDGE MCKAY\n\n# Case No. Case Name\n\n100 3:23-cv-02009-G-BN Hunsinger v. Atmos Energy Corporation\n\n101 3:23-cv-02010-B Johnson et al v. Crosby Elementary School et al\n3:23-cv-02011-B\n\n102 Sample v. SLI Enterprises Inc et al\n3:23-cv-02023-B\n\n103 Promed LLC v, Quintairos Prieto Wood & Boyer PA\n3:23-cv-02050-X\n\n104 Taste of Chengdu LLC v. Feng\n3:23-cv-G2070-G6\n\n105 Summers v. Longbrake et al\n3:23-cv-02071-E\n\n106 Hunter Mountain Investment Trust et al v. Highland Capital Management LP et al\n3:23-cv-02097-X\n\n107 Holcamb v. Monitronics International\n3:23-cv-02110-B\n\n108 Consumer Data Partners, LP et al v. Agentra LLC et al\n3:23-cv-02126-5\n\n109 Mosure et al. v. Southwest Airlines, Co.\n3:23-cv-02143-N\n\n110 Dillard v. Gaines Investment Trust et al\n3:23-cv-02148-K-BN\n\n411 Booth v. US Bank Trust NA\n3:23-ev-02155-L\n\n412 cici Enterprises LP v. HSB Specialty Insurance Company\n3:23-cv-02158-D\n\n113 Wilson v. Korth Direct Mortgage et al\n3:23-cv-02203-E\n\n114 Warehouse Solutions Inc v. Plus Veterans, LLC\n3:23-cv-02214-$\n\n115 Big Games Management LLC v. Bespoke Piush LLC et al\n3:23-cv-02232-B\n\n116 Campbell v. Methodist Hospitais of Dallas et al\n3:23-cv-02238-E\n\n117 Cameron v. QT South LLC et al\n3:23-cv-02243-E\n\n118 Paez v. Childrens Health System of Texas\n3:23-cv-02284-G\n\n119 Stanley v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC\n3:23-cv-02286-X\n\n120 Brandon Wade Photography LLC v. Killian Design LLC\n3:23-cv-02292-L\n\n121 Lloyd v. Athena Condominiums Co-Owners Association\n3:23-cv-02294-B-BN\n\n422 Andrews v. York et af\n3:23-cv-02307-G\n\n123 Lee v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al\n3:23-cv-02367-K\n\n124 City of Dallas v. Triple D Gear, LLC\n3:23-cv-02387-L\n\n125 Nasrallah v. Scottsdale Insurance Company\n\n\fCase 3:22-cv-01529-N Document 28 Filed 08/23/24 Page 8of14 PagelD 222\n\nExhibit A\nCASES TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF JUDGE DAVID L. HORAN TO JUDGE MCKAY\n# Case No. Case Name\n3:23-cv-02404-L\n126 Lilium GVP LLC v. Transportation Insurance Company et al\n3:23-cv-02421-X\n127 Principal Life Insurance Company v. Roque et al\n3:23-cv-02457-B-BN\n428 Young v. United Parcel Service Inc (Ohio)\n3:23-cv-02494-\u00a7\n4129 Hossain v. The Boeing Company\n3:23-cv-02504-K\n130 DAV Sub Inc v. QligSOFT Inc\n3:23-cv-02531-E\n131 Dawson v. Union Pacific Railroad\n3:23-cv-02532-E-BN\n132 Randle v. Brown et al\n3:23-cv-02539-X\n133 Bowers v. Uplift Education\n3:23-cv-02547-E\n134 Session v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al\n3:23-cv-02594-E\n135 Verna IP Holdings LLC v. Dais Inc\n\n3:23-cv-02624-N\n\n136 Doe v. International Association of Eating Disorder Professionals Foundation Inc et al\n3:23-cv-02633-S\n137 Motton v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC\n3:23-cv-02670-E\n138 Samadian v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company\n3:23-cv-02671-X\n139 APOD Group ELC v. Glen Lakes Homeowners Association Inc et al\n3:23-cv-02673-G\n140 Elliott v. Gonzalez et al\n3:23-cv-02708-B\n144 Dishmon v. Newkirk Logistics Inc\n3:23-cv-02725-D\n142 Pradia v. The City of Rhome et al\n3:23-cv-02737-N\n143 Rollins-Booker v. Senture LLC\n3:23-cv-02770-S\n144 Camacho v. Sajeda Inc et al\n3:23-cv-02795-E\n145 Coil v. Experian Information Solutions Inc et al\n3:23-cv-02807-K\n146 Wells Fargo Bank NA v. Williams et al\n3:23-cv-02827-G-BN\n447 Moka v. Huntex Properties LLC et al\n3:23-cv-02830-X\n148 Mesa Digital LLC v. One Plus USA Corp\n3:23-cv-02834-E\n149 Canada, Jr. et al v. Sherman\n3:23-cv-02839-E\n150 Accurate Metal Stamping LLC v. Chubb Indemnity Insurance Company et al\n\n\fCase 3:22-cv-01529-N Document 28 Filed 08/23/24 Page9of14 PagelD 223\n\nExhibit A\nCASES TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF JUDGE DAVID L. HORAN TO JUDGE MCKAY\n\n# Case No. Case Name\n3:24-cv-00002-L\n\n151 McLaughlin et al v. Family Assets Management LLC\n3:24-cv-00004-N\n\n152 Hill v. Garcia et af\n3:24-cv-00631-L\n\n153 Great American Insurance v, Truckmax Inc\n3:24-cv-00098-L\n\nLeon Capital Group LEC et al v. Princeton Excess & Surplus Lines Insurance Company\n\n154 et al\n3:24-cv-00122-B\n\n455 Slate/Sefect Inc v. Martin Marietta Materials Inc et al\n3:24-cv-00191-E\n\n156 Crum & Forster Insurance Company v. Shreno Limited\n3:24-cv-00255-E\n\n157 Blacknall v. Allata LLC et al\n3:24-cv-00285-G-BN\n\n158 Davis et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et ai\n3:24-cv-00331-5\n\n159 Tafolla v. Wacker et al\n3:24-cv-00341-S\n\n160 Forsythe et al v. Equifax Information Services LLC et ai\n3:24-cv-00347-K\n\n161 Homesteaders Life Company v. Williams\n3:24-cv-00361-E\n\n162 Kendrick v. QuickTrip Corporation\n3:24-cv-00382-B\n\n463 US Bank National Association v. Malloy\n3:24-cv-00388-E\n\n164 Elioznde v. Randalls Food and Drug LP\n3:24-cv-00417-X\n\n165 Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe\n3:24-cv-00434-L\n\n166 G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC v. Aguifar\n3:24-cv-00498-K\n\n167 Highland Employee Retention Assets LLC v. Dondero et al\n3:24-cv-00528-B\n\n168 Texas State Board of Dental Examiners v. Doe\n3:24-cv-00544-D-BN\n\n169 Rector v. Director, TDC)-CID\n3:24-cv-00568-N\n\n170 Strong v. Bank of America Corporation et al\n3:24-cv-00569-5\n\ni71 Haag Engineering Co v. Ellis et al\n3:24-cv-00647-L\n\n172 Languasco et al v. Blair Logistics LLC\n3:24-cv-00658-5\n\n173 Gardner v. The Lincoin National Life Insurance Company\n3:24-cv-00691-D\n\n174 Miller v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP\n3:24-ev-00702-L\n\n175 Birrueta v. State Farm Lloyds\n\n\fCase 3:22-cv-01529-N Document 28 Filed 08/23/24 Page 10o0f14 PagelD 224\n\nExhibit A\n\nCASES TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF JUDGE DAVID L. HORAN TO JUDGE MCKAY\n\n# Case No. Case Name\n3:24-cv-00728-X-BN\n\n176 Said v. EAN Holdings LLC et al\n3:24-cv-00791-E\n\n177 Wilson v. British Airways PLC\n3:24-cv-00796-L\n\n178 Sanchez v. Caliber Holdings LLC\n\n179 3:24-cv-00798-E King v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC\n3:24-cv-00809-S\n\n180 Kenney et al v. Dallas County Texas\n3:24-cv-00817-B\n\n181 Children's Health System of Texas v. UnitedHeaithcare Insurance Company\n3:24-cv-00892-B\n\n182 Toombs et al v. Kaufman County, Texas et al\n3:24-cv-00905-E-BN\n\n183 Rass v. Texas Instruments\n3:24-cv-00909-K-BN\n\n184 Bryant v. EverBank NA\n3:24-cv-00971-X\n\n185 Morgan v. Fundamental Clinical And Operational Services LLC\n3:24-cv-01020-X\n\n186 The Shore Firm LLP v. Videoshare LLC\n\n187 3:24-cv-01051-5 Gilliard v. Southwest Airlines Federal Credit Union\n3:24-ev-01075-N\n\n188 Ayangbile et al v. Children's Health Services of Texas\n3:24-cyv-011329-X\n\n189 Ray v. Experian Information Solutions Inc et al\n3:24-cv-01175-S-BN\n\n190 Romero et al v. US Bank National Association\n3:24-cv-01198-L\n\n191 Nautilus Hyosung America Inc v. BMO Bank NA et al\n3:24-cv-01209-D\n\n192 American Alliance for Equal Rights v. Southwest Airlines Co\n3:24-cv-01233-5\n\n193 Smith v. Montez et al\n3:24-cv-01262-D\n\n194 Brandon Wade Photography, LLC v. OTC Bar LLC\n3:24-cv-01288-D-BN\n\n195 Williams v. Richardson Independent School District\n3:24-cv-01319-G\n\n196 Daniels-Mock v. Taxir Logistics Inc et al\n3:24-cv-01326-K-BN\n\n197 Wickman v. Navarro County Jail\n3:24-cv-01339-B\n\n198 Travers v. Allstate Vehicle and Property insurance Company\n3:24-cv-01358-E\n\n199 Joe Hand Promotions inc v. Carbajal et at\n3:24-cv-01370-D-BN\n\n200 Council v. Draftkings et al\n3:24-cv-01397-K\n\n201 PacSec3 LLC v. RSA Federal LLC\n3:24-cv-01413-X\n\n202 Guillen et al v. U-Haul Company of Texas et al\n\n\fCase 3:22-cv-01529-N Document 28 Filed 08/23/24 Page 11of14 PagelD 225\n\nExhibit A\n\nCASES TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF JUDGE DAVID L. HORAN TO JUDGE MCKAY\n# Case No. Case Name\n203 3:24-cv-01418-L Wilson v. Frontier Communications Parent, Inc.\n3:24-cv-O1447-E\n204 Akhmedov v. TA Operating LLC\n3:24-cv-01461-K\n205 Moreno et al v. Alan Halperin, In his capacity as Trustee of the GFES Liquidation Trust\n3:24-cv-01479-$\n206 NexPoint Real Estate Partners LLC et al v. Highland Capital Management LP\n3:24-cv-01483-G\n207 Amazon.com Inc et al v. Baik et al\n3:24-cv-01519-B-BN\n208 Robinson-Durham v. Navarro County Jail\n3:24-cv-01531-X\n209 Dugaboy Investment Trust et al v. Highland Capital Management LP et al\n3:24-cv-01541-B\n210 Sanchez et al v. Schneider National Carriers Inc et al\n3:24-cv-01554-D\n211 Hernandez v. Bishop Cider Company LLC et al\n3:24-cv-01563-D\nWLands Limited Partnership LP et al v. Founders Plaza Nursing & Rehabilitation\n212 Partners LLC et al\n213 3:24-cv-01603-X Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe\n214 3:24-cv-01610-E Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe\n215 3:24-cv-01641-D Elizondo v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al\n2156 3:24-cv-01642-K Aurzada et af v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA et al\n217 3:24-cv-01646-G-BN Sharman v. H&R Block et al\n218 3:24-cv-01647-N Rodriguez v. Home Depot USA inc\n219 3:24-cv-01684-L Criss v. Grocery Delivery E-Services USA Inc\n220 3:24-cv-01685-G Harris v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al\n221 3:24-cv-01692-N Ricker v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al\n222 3:24-cv-01711-D Mitchel v, Pitre et al\n223 3:24-cv-01717-K Ayala v. Chedraui USA Inc\n224 3:24-cv-01716-L Hutchinson v. Sunrun Inc\n225 3:24-cv-01720-K Miller v. Xpress Global Systems LLC\ngag \u00ab| 3:44-cv-01743-L Collier v. Carter\n227 3:24-Cv-01768-S Bosman v. Amazon.com inc et al\n3:24-cv-01786-L\n228 Hunter Mountain Investment Trust et al v. Highland Capital Management LP et al\n3:24-cv-01787-L\n229 Hunter Mountain Investment Trust et al v. Highland Capital Management LP et al\n230 3:24-cv-01796-8 Larsen v. Apt All Points Transportation LLC et al\n231 3:24-cv-01811-D McAfee v. Lear Corporation\n232 3:24-cv-01821-K Ryan LLC v, Radin\n233 3:24-cv-01839-E Forstey v. Jordan et al\n234 3:24-cv-01873-X Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe\n235 3:24-cv-01882-X Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe\n236 3:24-cv-01908-D Hibdon v. Atrium Hospitality LP\n3:24-cv-01912-L\n237 Hunter Mountain Investment Trust v. Highland Capital Management LP et al\n\n10\n\fCase 3:22-cv-01529-N Document 28 Filed 08/23/24 Page 12o0f14 PagelD 226\n\nExhibit A\n\nCASES TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF JUDGE DAVID L. HORAN TO JUDGE MCKAY\n# Case No. Case Name\n238 3:24-cv-01949-X Alentisar Trading Company v. Eyondi et al\n239 3:24-cv-01967-S-BN Willtams v. Richardson ISD\n\n41\n\fCase 3:22-cv-01529-N Document 28 Filed 08/23/24 Page 130f14 PagelD 227\n\nExhibit A\n\nCASES TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF JUDGE REBECCA RUTHERFORD\nTO JUDGE MCKAY\n\n1 3:22-cv-02887-L-BT Murphy v. Director\n\n2 3:23-cv-00316-B-BT Marcus v. Director\n\n3 3:23-cv-00978-D-BT Walton v. USA\n\n4 3:23-cv-02449-D-BT Manzo v. Federal Bureau of Prisons\n\n5 3:23-cv-2677-S-BT Jackson v. Smali Business Administration et al\n\n6 3:24-cv-00175-S-BT Gonzales v. Collier\n\n7 3:24-cv-00661-B-BT Hammons v. Tradeline Motorcars et al\n\n8 3:24-cv-00637-S-BT Humes v. McDonald's Walmart #5416-945\n\n9 3:24-cv-01708-X-BT Traeger v. Jones et al\n\n10 3:23-cv-00315-X-BT Duhon v. Metropolitan Tower Life Insurance Company et al\n\n11 3:23-cv-02194-8-BT Walters v. Garland\n\n12 3:23-cv-02157-L-BT United States of America v. Morgan et al\n3:24-cv-00277-L National Association of Blind Merchants et al v. The Army & Air Force Exchange\n\n13 Service et al\n\n14 3:24-cv-00273-N-BT De Pute v. United States of America et al\n\n15 3:24-cv-00703-B-BT Freeman v. USA et al\n\n16 3:23-cv-01994-S-BT Davis v. City of Mclendon Chisholm et al\n\n17 3:24-cv-00731-L Crenshaw v. Anderson et al\n\n18 3:24-mc-00034-B-BT Calhoun v. United States\n\n19 3:23-cv-02682-5-BT Phoenix Bulk Carriers LLC v. CAL-IXA Aggregates LLC\n\n20 3:24-cv-01590-N-BT Jackson v. United States Postal Service et al\n\n27 3:24-cv-01759-B-BT Woods v. Delta Air Lines inc\n\n22 2:23-cv-00171-BT Row v. Commissioner\n\n23 1:24-cv-00083-BT Gonzales v. Commissioner\n\n24 5:23-cv-00293-BT Mims v. Commissioner\n\n25 3:14-cv-02970-X Clapper et al v. American Realty Investors Inc et al\n\n26 3:20-cv-01276-N Kunze et al v. Baylor Scott & White Health et al\n\n27 3:20-cv-01364-E Malbrew et al v. A+ Charter Schools\n\n28 3:21-cv-02131-K Bernstein v. Maximus Federal Services Inc\n\n29 3:22-cv-00876-N Grimmett et al v. Coleman et al\n\n30 3:22-cv-02116-X Black v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America\n\n31 3:22-cv-02182-M Range! de Oliveira v. Bierman\n\n32 3:22-cv-02184-B Mid-Continent Casualty Company v. Vibrant Builders et ai\n\n33 3:23-cv-00271-K Green v. USA\n\n34 3:23-cv-01340-L Perez v. Experian Information Solutions Inc\n\n35 3:23-cv-01412-N Aravamuthan v. US Citizenship & immigration Service et al\n\n36 3:23-cv-01416-B8 Landmark American Insurance Company v. Richland Trace Owners Association Inc\n\n37 3:23-cv-01441-N Thompson v. McGehee et al\n\n38 3:23-cv-01490-S Norwood v. Dallas County Hospital District\n\n39 3:23-cv-01494-N Mathew v. Santander Consumer USA Inc\n\n40 3:23-cv-02051-N Shrestha et al v. USCIS et al\n\n41 3:23-cv-02089-E Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. ACI Payments Inc et al\n\n42 3:22-cv-01529-N Oliver v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC et al\n\n12\n\fCase 3:22-cv-01529-N Document 28 Filed 08/23/24 Page 14o0f14 PagelD 228\n\nExhibit A\n\nCASES TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF JUDGE REBECCA RUTHERFORD\nTO JUDGE MCKAY\n\n43 3:23-cv-00045-E Mauricio et al v. US Postal Service\n\n44 3:23-cv-01168-N-BT United States of America v. $39,900 in US Currency\n45 3:23-cv-02146-D Securities and Exchange Commission v. Verges et al\n\n46 3:23-cv-02222-K Heard et al v. State Farm Lloyds\n\n47 3:23-cv-02591-D Oldham v. State Farm Lloyds\n\n48 3:23-cv-02621-8 Sealed v. Sealed\n\n49 3:23-cv-02701-\u00a3 Pertrorock Mineral Holdings, LLC et al v. Minerva Resources, LLC et al\n50 3:23-cv-02271-S Hayes v. City of Dallas et al\n\n51 3:23-cv-02338-K Smith v. USA\n\n52 3:23-cv-02462-D Botone et al v. Unitrin Safeguard Insurance Company\n\n53 3:24-cv-00014-D Hardrick v. Wells Fargo Bank National Association et al\n54 3:24-cv-00201-K Ware et al v. Meridian Security Insurance Company\n\n55 3:24-cv-00204-X United States of America v. $45,000.00 in US Currency\n56 3:24-cv-00220-B Bayazeed v. Robinson et al\n\n57 3:24-cv-00664-X VDPP, LLC v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC\n\n58 3:24-cv-00700-X-BT Garrison v. John Doe et al\n\n59 3:24-cv-00943-E M&H Metal Specialties Inc v. Sheet Metal Workers Nat'l Pension Fd\n60 3:24-cv-00944-5 USA v. Various Amounts of Funds Seized\n\n61 3:24-cv-01169-B Nieto v. USA\n\n62 3:24-cv-01484-S5 Antunez-Martinez v. Mayorkas\n\n63 3:24-cv-01525-K Gonzales Miranda et al v. Jaddou\n\n64 3:24-cv-01674-E-BT Turner v. Equal Employment Opportunity Comm et al\n65 3:24-cv-01676-S Bibars v. Jaddou et al\n\n66 3:24-cv-01795-S Valtrus Innovations Ltd et al v. Google LLC\n\n67 3:24-cv-01902-K-BT Allen-Straight v. Director-TBC)\n\n68 3:24-cv-02028-X-BT Lockwood v. Chilcoat et al\n\n69 3:24-cv-02114-K-BT Santana v. Cantu et al\n\n70 3:24-cv-02127-X-BT Stancu v. Equal Employment Cppertunity Commission\n71 3:24-cy-02132-S-BT Damm v. Dallas County Jail\n\n72 3:24-cv-02143-B-BT Jalloul v. USA\n\n73 3:24-cv-02144-5-BT Jeffery v. NLN\n\n74 4:24-cv-00678-B8T Bolden v. Commissioner\n\n13\n","ocr_status":1,"date_upload":"2024-08-23T15:02:17.726125-07:00","document_number":"13","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"177017081985","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":false,"document_type":1,"description":"Order Reassigning Case AND ~Util - Set/Clear Flags","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-08-23T15:02:17.472429-07:00","date_modified":"2024-08-23T15:05:29.471387-07:00","date_filed":"2024-08-23","time_filed":"17:00:23","entry_number":13,"recap_sequence_number":"2024-08-23.001","pacer_sequence_number":51,"description":"Special Order No. 3-354: Effective August 23, 2024, the cases listed on Exhibit A to this order are transferred to Magistrate Judge Brian McKay and shall henceforth carry the suffix letters BW. This case has been reassigned pursuant to Special Order No. 3-354. (The clerk has mailed a copy to all non-ECF users.) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Brian W McKay on 8/23/2024) (rekc)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/376640144/","id":376640144,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67922478/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/384272769/","id":384272769,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"","date_created":"2024-01-25T12:26:39.097834-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-25T12:26:39.104199-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Document","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-01-25T12:26:39.076418-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-25T12:26:39.076435-08:00","date_filed":"2024-01-25","time_filed":"13:55:45","entry_number":null,"recap_sequence_number":"2024-01-25.001","pacer_sequence_number":null,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/373767052/","id":373767052,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67922478/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/381325981/","id":381325981,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"","date_created":"2023-12-20T09:23:36.199414-08:00","date_modified":"2023-12-20T09:23:36.204487-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Document","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2023-12-20T09:23:36.152701-08:00","date_modified":"2023-12-20T09:23:36.152714-08:00","date_filed":"2023-12-20","time_filed":"11:05:11","entry_number":null,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-12-20.001","pacer_sequence_number":null,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/372685285/","id":372685285,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67922478/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/380225489/","id":380225489,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67922478/5/smith-v-united-states/","date_created":"2023-12-07T15:28:03.951111-08:00","date_modified":"2023-12-07T15:28:03.955312-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"5","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"177016460555","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order Reassigning Case AND ~Util - Set/Clear Flags","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2023-12-07T15:28:03.934389-08:00","date_modified":"2023-12-07T15:28:03.938383-08:00","date_filed":"2023-12-07","time_filed":"16:28:11","entry_number":5,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-12-07.001","pacer_sequence_number":25,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/369193337/","id":369193337,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67922478/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/376548699/","id":376548699,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67922478/3/smith-v-united-states/","date_created":"2023-10-27T13:22:54.038637-07:00","date_modified":"2023-10-27T13:22:54.046565-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"3","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"177016374006","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order to Show Cause/Order to Answer","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2023-10-27T13:22:54.007071-07:00","date_modified":"2023-10-27T13:22:54.019031-07:00","date_filed":"2023-10-27","time_filed":"14:53:23","entry_number":3,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-10-27.001","pacer_sequence_number":17,"description":"","tags":[]}],"entries_total":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/?count=on&docket=67922478&page_size=40"}