{"cached_at":"2026-09-04T09:51:32.433000+00:00","cl_docket_id":"71972050","docket":{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","id":71972050,"court":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/courts/cand/","court_id":"cand","original_court_info":null,"idb_data":null,"clusters":[],"audio_files":[],"assigned_to":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/people/807/","referred_to":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/people/9096/","bankruptcy_information":null,"absolute_url":"/docket/71972050/ted-entertainment-inc-v-nvidia-corporation/","date_created":"2025-11-26T18:57:54.251375-08:00","date_modified":"2026-09-01T18:03:49.938030-07:00","source":1,"appeal_from_str":"","assigned_to_str":"Edward J. Davila","referred_to_str":"Susan Van Keulen","panel_str":"","date_last_index":null,"date_cert_granted":null,"date_cert_denied":null,"date_argued":null,"date_reargued":null,"date_reargument_denied":null,"date_filed":"2025-11-26","date_terminated":null,"date_last_filing":"2026-08-31","case_name_short":"","case_name":"Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. Nvidia Corporation","case_name_full":"","slug":"ted-entertainment-inc-v-nvidia-corporation","docket_number":"5:25-cv-10287","docket_number_core":"2510287","docket_number_raw":"5:25-cv-10287","docket_number_source":0,"federal_dn_office_code":"5","federal_dn_case_type":"cv","federal_dn_judge_initials_assigned":"EJD","federal_dn_judge_initials_referred":"","federal_defendant_number":null,"pacer_case_id":"460521","cause":"17:101 Copyright Infringement","nature_of_suit":"820 Copyright","jury_demand":"Plaintiff","jurisdiction_type":"Federal Question","appellate_fee_status":"","appellate_case_type_information":"","mdl_status":"","filepath_ia":"","filepath_ia_json":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"ia_needs_upload":true,"ia_date_first_change":"2025-11-26T18:57:54.237892-08:00","date_blocked":null,"blocked":false,"appeal_from":null,"parent_docket":null,"tags":[],"panel":[]},"parties":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/16754081/","id":16754081,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/11185867/","attorney_id":11185867,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/11185867/","attorney_id":11185867,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/11185867/","attorney_id":11185867,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/11185868/","attorney_id":11185868,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/11185868/","attorney_id":11185868,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/11185868/","attorney_id":11185868,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/11185869/","attorney_id":11185869,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/11185869/","attorney_id":11185869,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13606737/","attorney_id":13606737,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13606737/","attorney_id":13606737,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13597263/","attorney_id":13597263,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13603168/","attorney_id":13603168,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13603168/","attorney_id":13603168,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13597264/","attorney_id":13597264,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13597265/","attorney_id":13597265,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13597266/","attorney_id":13597266,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13597266/","attorney_id":13597266,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":4}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"name":"Defendant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2025-11-26T19:34:19.363041-08:00","date_modified":"2025-11-26T19:34:19.363060-08:00","name":"Nvidia Corporation","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/16754080/","id":16754080,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/10951369/","attorney_id":10951369,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/10951369/","attorney_id":10951369,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13548644/","attorney_id":13548644,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13548644/","attorney_id":13548644,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/10912768/","attorney_id":10912768,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/10912768/","attorney_id":10912768,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/11185865/","attorney_id":11185865,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13548645/","attorney_id":13548645,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13548645/","attorney_id":13548645,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13548646/","attorney_id":13548646,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13548647/","attorney_id":13548647,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13548648/","attorney_id":13548648,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"name":"Plaintiff","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2025-11-26T19:34:19.303316-08:00","date_modified":"2025-11-26T19:34:19.303329-08:00","name":"Golfholics, Inc.","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/16754079/","id":16754079,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/10951369/","attorney_id":10951369,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/10951369/","attorney_id":10951369,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13548644/","attorney_id":13548644,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13548644/","attorney_id":13548644,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/10912768/","attorney_id":10912768,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/10912768/","attorney_id":10912768,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13417469/","attorney_id":13417469,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13417469/","attorney_id":13417469,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/11185865/","attorney_id":11185865,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13548645/","attorney_id":13548645,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13548645/","attorney_id":13548645,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13548646/","attorney_id":13548646,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13548647/","attorney_id":13548647,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13548648/","attorney_id":13548648,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"name":"Plaintiff","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2025-11-26T19:34:19.255205-08:00","date_modified":"2025-11-26T19:34:19.255224-08:00","name":"Matt Fisher","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/16754078/","id":16754078,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13548644/","attorney_id":13548644,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13548644/","attorney_id":13548644,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/11185865/","attorney_id":11185865,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/11185865/","attorney_id":11185865,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13548645/","attorney_id":13548645,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13548645/","attorney_id":13548645,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/10951369/","attorney_id":10951369,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13548646/","attorney_id":13548646,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13548647/","attorney_id":13548647,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13548648/","attorney_id":13548648,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/10951370/","attorney_id":10951370,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/10912768/","attorney_id":10912768,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","docket_id":71972050,"name":"Plaintiff","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2025-11-26T19:34:19.164391-08:00","date_modified":"2025-11-26T19:34:19.164401-08:00","name":"Ted Entertainment, Inc.","extra_info":""}],"entries":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/476478909/","id":476478909,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/492042244/","id":492042244,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/71972050/78/ted-entertainment-inc-v-nvidia-corporation/","date_created":"2026-08-31T20:31:54.388732-07:00","date_modified":"2026-08-31T20:31:54.398768-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"78","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"035027582262","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Response","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-08-31T20:31:54.362833-07:00","date_modified":"2026-08-31T20:31:54.369407-07:00","date_filed":"2026-08-31","time_filed":"20:08:43","entry_number":78,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-08-31.001","pacer_sequence_number":235,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/476041729/","id":476041729,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/491592056/","id":491592056,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/71972050/77/ted-entertainment-inc-v-nvidia-corporation/","date_created":"2026-08-27T11:32:26.474520-07:00","date_modified":"2026-08-28T12:37:48.276213-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":5,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"77","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"035027565309","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":false,"document_type":1,"description":"Response ( Non Motion )","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-08-27T11:32:26.348066-07:00","date_modified":"2026-08-27T11:32:26.385199-07:00","date_filed":"2026-08-27","time_filed":"11:03:28","entry_number":77,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-08-27.001","pacer_sequence_number":230,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/475784521/","id":475784521,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/491327670/","id":491327670,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/71972050/76/ted-entertainment-inc-v-nvidia-corporation/","date_created":"2026-08-25T16:01:42.413715-07:00","date_modified":"2026-09-02T12:23:40.230248-07:00","sha1":"538d913aaa62457f70ba090f68376779b00f432f","page_count":1,"file_size":133725,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.cand.460521/gov.uscourts.cand.460521.76.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cand.460521/gov.uscourts.cand.460521.76.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":" Case 5:25-cv-10287-EJD Document 76 Filed 08/25/26 Page 1 of 1\n\n\n\n\n 1\n\n 2\n\n 3\n\n 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n\n 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA\n\n 6\n\n 7 TED ENTERTAINMENT, INC., et al., Case No. 25-cv-10931-JST\n Plaintiffs,\n 8\n REFERRAL FOR PURPOSE OF\n v. DETERMINING RELATIONSHIP\n 9\n\n 10 META PLATFORMS, INC.,\n Defendant.\n 11\n\n 12\nNorthern District of California\n United States District Court\n\n\n\n\n 13 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12(c), the above-entitled case is hereby referred to the\n\n 14 Honorable Edward J. Davila for consideration of whether the case is related to Ted Entertainment,\n\n 15 Inc. v. NVIDIA Corporation, No. 25-cv-10287-EJD.\n\n 16 IT IS SO ORDERED.\n\n 17 Dated: August 25, 2026\n ______________________________________\n 18\n JON S. TIGAR\n 19 United States District Judge\n\n 20\n\n 21\n\n 22\n\n 23\n\n 24\n\n 25\n\n 26\n 27\n\n 28\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2026-08-31T18:09:34.184784-07:00","document_number":"76","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"035027556527","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":true,"is_sealed":false,"document_type":1,"description":"Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-08-25T16:01:42.381833-07:00","date_modified":"2026-09-01T18:03:49.979642-07:00","date_filed":"2026-08-25","time_filed":"15:56:00","entry_number":76,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-08-25.001","pacer_sequence_number":228,"description":"REFERRAL FOR PURPOSE OF DETERMINING RELATIONSHIP. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on 08/25/2026. (dms, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/475745183/","id":475745183,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/491287487/","id":491287487,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/71972050/75/ted-entertainment-inc-v-nvidia-corporation/","date_created":"2026-08-25T13:07:41.109914-07:00","date_modified":"2026-08-26T13:53:43.856769-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":2,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"75","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"035027554548","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":false,"document_type":1,"description":"Order on Motion for Leave to File","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-08-25T13:07:41.085269-07:00","date_modified":"2026-08-25T13:07:41.092380-07:00","date_filed":"2026-08-25","time_filed":"12:32:38","entry_number":75,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-08-25.001","pacer_sequence_number":226,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/475663161/","id":475663161,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/491203013/","id":491203013,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/71972050/73/ted-entertainment-inc-v-nvidia-corporation/","date_created":"2026-08-25T05:49:45.076631-07:00","date_modified":"2026-08-25T05:49:45.076642-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"73","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-08-25T05:49:45.033310-07:00","date_modified":"2026-08-25T05:49:45.048993-07:00","date_filed":"2026-08-24","time_filed":null,"entry_number":73,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-08-24.001","pacer_sequence_number":null,"description":"CLERKS NOTICE TAKING MOTION UNDER SUBMISSION WITHOUT ORAL ARGUMENT. The Motion to Stay Discovery (ECF No. 62 ) before Judge Edward J. Davila previously noticed for 8/27/2026 has been taken under submission without oral argument pursuant to Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). The 8/26/2026 hearing is VACATED - NO APPEARANCE NECESSARY. The Court to issue further Order on the submitted motion. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (crr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2026) (Entered: 08/24/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/475628274/","id":475628274,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/491166847/","id":491166847,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/71972050/74/ted-entertainment-inc-v-nvidia-corporation/","date_created":"2026-08-24T16:33:45.896812-07:00","date_modified":"2026-08-26T13:53:44.072907-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":4,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"74","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"035027551247","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":false,"document_type":1,"description":"Administrative Motion per Civil Local Rule 7-11","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-08-24T16:33:45.876579-07:00","date_modified":"2026-08-25T05:49:45.100842-07:00","date_filed":"2026-08-24","time_filed":"16:18:04","entry_number":74,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-08-24.002","pacer_sequence_number":224,"description":"ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISIONS AFTER NOTICED HEARING DATE filed by Matt Fisher, Golfholics, Inc., Ted Entertainment, Inc.. Responses due by 8/28/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Samantha Frazier, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Proposed Order)(Nath, Rohit) (Filed on 8/24/2026) (Entered: 08/24/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/475547465/","id":475547465,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/491083484/","id":491083484,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"","date_created":"2026-08-24T09:35:48.031256-07:00","date_modified":"2026-08-24T09:35:48.031286-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Clerk's Notice","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-08-24T09:35:48.012026-07:00","date_modified":"2026-08-24T09:35:48.012052-07:00","date_filed":"2026-08-24","time_filed":"09:13:22","entry_number":null,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-08-24.001","pacer_sequence_number":null,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/473416152/","id":473416152,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/488881288/","id":488881288,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/71972050/72/ted-entertainment-inc-v-nvidia-corporation/","date_created":"2026-08-05T18:05:52.191266-07:00","date_modified":"2026-08-05T18:13:28.131887-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":4,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"72","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"035027475061","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":false,"document_type":1,"description":"Leave to File Document","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-08-05T18:05:52.158332-07:00","date_modified":"2026-08-12T14:01:04.668824-07:00","date_filed":"2026-08-05","time_filed":"17:44:31","entry_number":72,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-08-05.001","pacer_sequence_number":220,"description":"MOTION for Leave to File Statement of Recent Decision after Noticed Hearing Date filed by Matt Fisher, Golfholics, Inc., Ted Entertainment, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Samantha Frazier, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Proposed Order)(Nath, Rohit) (Filed on 8/5/2026) (Entered: 08/05/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/472415361/","id":472415361,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/487848227/","id":487848227,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/71972050/70/ted-entertainment-inc-v-nvidia-corporation/","date_created":"2026-07-28T12:34:29.262044-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-29T07:35:24.101076-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"70","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"035027436320","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":true,"document_type":1,"description":"Transcript","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-07-28T12:34:29.240593-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-29T16:18:29.197500-07:00","date_filed":"2026-07-28","time_filed":"12:14:46","entry_number":70,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-07-28.001","pacer_sequence_number":216,"description":"Transcript of Proceedings held on 07/23/2026, before Judge Davila. Court Reporter Irene L. Rodriguez, email address Irene_Rodriguez@cand.uscourts.gov. Per General Order No. 59 and Judicial Conference policy, this transcript may be viewed only at the Clerk's Office public terminal or may be purchased through the Court Reporter until the deadline for the Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Any Notice of Intent to Request Redaction, if required, is due no later than 5 business days from date of this filing. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 10/26/2026. (Rodriguez, Irene) (Filed on 7/28/2026) (Entered: 07/28/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/472415347/","id":472415347,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/487848213/","id":487848213,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/71972050/71/ted-entertainment-inc-v-nvidia-corporation/","date_created":"2026-07-28T12:34:28.613366-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-29T07:35:26.541344-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":1,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"71","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"035027436332","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":false,"document_type":1,"description":"Transcript Order","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-07-28T12:34:28.582617-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-29T16:18:29.209685-07:00","date_filed":"2026-07-28","time_filed":"12:16:15","entry_number":71,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-07-28.002","pacer_sequence_number":218,"description":"TRANSCRIPT ORDER for proceedings held on 07/23/2026 before Judge Edward J. Davila for Court Reporter Irene Rodriguez (Rodriguez, Irene) (Filed on 7/28/2026) (Entered: 07/28/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/471945446/","id":471945446,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/487362819/","id":487362819,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/71972050/69/ted-entertainment-inc-v-nvidia-corporation/","date_created":"2026-07-23T14:02:01.982851-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-29T07:35:26.525679-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":1,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"69","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"035027418200","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":false,"document_type":1,"description":"Transcript Order","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-07-23T14:02:01.896339-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-29T16:18:29.183845-07:00","date_filed":"2026-07-23","time_filed":"13:31:26","entry_number":69,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-07-23.003","pacer_sequence_number":214,"description":"TRANSCRIPT ORDER for proceedings held on July 23, 2026 before Judge Edward J. Davila by Matt Fisher, Golfholics, Inc., Ted Entertainment, Inc., for Court Reporter Irene Rodriguez. (Nath, Rohit) (Filed on 7/23/2026) (Entered: 07/23/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/471945445/","id":471945445,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/487362818/","id":487362818,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/71972050/67/ted-entertainment-inc-v-nvidia-corporation/","date_created":"2026-07-23T14:02:01.647501-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-23T14:02:01.686341-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"67","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-07-23T14:02:01.597782-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-23T14:02:01.613459-07:00","date_filed":"2026-07-23","time_filed":null,"entry_number":67,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-07-23.001","pacer_sequence_number":null,"description":"Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Edward J. Davila: Motion Hearing held on 7/23/2026 re 33 Motion to Dismiss (9:04-10:13 AM) Initial Case Management Conference held on 7/23/2026 (10:13-10:26 AM).Discussion with Counsel re case relation and re 62 Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Resolution of Motion to Dismiss. Neither party seeking case relation. Counsel to meet and confer re requested stay.Total Time in Court: 1 hr, 22 min (9:04-10:26 AM). Court Reporter: Irene Rodriguez. Plaintiff Attorney: Rohit Nath, Jarrett Ellzey, Tom Kherkher. Defendant Attorney: Lauren Cury, Vassi Iliadis, Anna Shaw, Christine Pinnkathok. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (crr, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 7/23/2026) (Entered: 07/23/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/471926868/","id":471926868,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/487343710/","id":487343710,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/71972050/68/ted-entertainment-inc-v-nvidia-corporation/","date_created":"2026-07-23T12:36:07.792236-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-29T07:35:19.949255-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":1,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"68","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"035027417676","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":false,"document_type":1,"description":"Transcript Order","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-07-23T12:36:07.755112-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-23T14:02:01.718758-07:00","date_filed":"2026-07-23","time_filed":"12:26:02","entry_number":68,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-07-23.002","pacer_sequence_number":212,"description":"TRANSCRIPT ORDER for proceedings held on 7/23/2026 before Judge Edward J. Davila by Nvidia Corporation, for Court Reporter Irene Rodriguez. (Cury, Lauren) (Filed on 7/23/2026) (Entered: 07/23/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/471918928/","id":471918928,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/487335694/","id":487335694,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"","date_created":"2026-07-23T12:06:39.032830-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-23T12:06:39.042918-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Case Management Conference - Initial AND Motion Hearing AND ~Util - Set Deadlines/Hearings","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-07-23T12:06:39.015292-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-23T12:06:39.015308-07:00","date_filed":"2026-07-23","time_filed":"11:52:46","entry_number":null,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-07-23.001","pacer_sequence_number":null,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/471528329/","id":471528329,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/486935251/","id":486935251,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/71972050/66/ted-entertainment-inc-v-nvidia-corporation/","date_created":"2026-07-20T17:05:14.133902-07:00","date_modified":"2026-08-13T16:19:10.906853-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":10,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"66","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"035027402769","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":false,"document_type":1,"description":"Reply to Opposition/Response","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-07-20T17:05:14.109086-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-23T14:02:01.443687-07:00","date_filed":"2026-07-20","time_filed":"16:46:31","entry_number":66,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-07-20.001","pacer_sequence_number":203,"description":"REPLY (re 62 MOTION to Stay Discovery Pending Resolution of Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint ) filed by Nvidia Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Lauren Cury, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C)(Cury, Lauren) (Filed on 7/20/2026) Modified on 7/21/2026 (anj, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 07/20/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/471331828/","id":471331828,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/486733308/","id":486733308,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/71972050/65/ted-entertainment-inc-v-nvidia-corporation/","date_created":"2026-07-17T21:34:10.568101-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-23T14:02:01.383945-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":12,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"65","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"035027398063","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":false,"document_type":1,"description":"Opposition/Response to Motion","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-07-17T21:34:10.541175-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-23T14:02:01.275621-07:00","date_filed":"2026-07-17","time_filed":"21:17:24","entry_number":65,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-07-17.001","pacer_sequence_number":200,"description":"OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re 62 MOTION to Stay Discovery Pending Resolution of Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint ) filed by Matt Fisher, Golfholics, Inc., Ted Entertainment, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Samantha Frazier, # 2 Exhibit A)(Frazier, Samantha) (Filed on 7/17/2026) Modified on 7/21/2026 (anj, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 07/17/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/470701959/","id":470701959,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/486086711/","id":486086711,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/71972050/64/ted-entertainment-inc-v-nvidia-corporation/","date_created":"2026-07-13T17:02:16.340469-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-23T14:02:01.233778-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":14,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"64","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"035027373564","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":false,"document_type":1,"description":"Joint Case Management Statement","acms_document_guid":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/486117260/","id":486117260,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/71972050/64/1/ted-entertainment-inc-v-nvidia-corporation/","date_created":"2026-07-14T06:10:12.948990-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-15T14:44:12.887948-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":3,"file_size":169106,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"64","attachment_number":1,"pacer_doc_id":"035027373565","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":false,"document_type":2,"description":"Exhibit A","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-07-13T17:02:16.285683-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-23T14:02:01.203760-07:00","date_filed":"2026-07-13","time_filed":"16:44:20","entry_number":64,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-07-13.001","pacer_sequence_number":195,"description":"JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT filed by Matt Fisher, Golfholics, Inc., Ted Entertainment, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Frazier, Samantha) (Filed on 7/13/2026) (Entered: 07/13/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/469942287/","id":469942287,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/485298283/","id":485298283,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/71972050/63/ted-entertainment-inc-v-nvidia-corporation/","date_created":"2026-07-07T08:33:31.859894-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-23T14:02:01.154517-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":4,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"63","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"035027346052","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":false,"document_type":1,"description":"Certificate of Interested Entities, Corporate Disclosure Statement, or Rule 7.1 Disclosures","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-07-07T08:33:31.837505-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-23T14:02:01.127532-07:00","date_filed":"2026-07-07","time_filed":"08:14:18","entry_number":63,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-07-07.001","pacer_sequence_number":191,"description":"Certificate of Interested Entities by Matt Fisher, Golfholics, Inc., Ted Entertainment, Inc.,Certification of Conflicts (Ellzey, Jarrett) (Filed on 7/7/2026) (Entered: 07/07/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/469705250/","id":469705250,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/485053644/","id":485053644,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/71972050/62/ted-entertainment-inc-v-nvidia-corporation/","date_created":"2026-07-03T16:01:39.565552-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-23T14:02:01.068899-07:00","sha1":"d3b6daf5d8ebc94e9561601d0302b7b83b127c69","page_count":13,"file_size":278306,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.cand.460521/gov.uscourts.cand.460521.62.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cand.460521/gov.uscourts.cand.460521.62.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":" Case 5:25-cv-10287-EJD Document 62 Filed 07/03/26 Page 1 of 13\n\n\n\n 1 HOGAN LOVELLS CADWALADER US LLP\n Vassi Iliadis (Bar No. 163450)\n 2 Joe O\u2019Connor (Bar No. 274421)\n 1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1400\n 3 Los Angeles, CA 90067\n Telephone: (310) 785-4600\n 4 vassi.iliadis@hlc.com\n joe.oconnor@hlc.com\n 5\n Lauren B. Cury (pro hac vice)\n 6 Anna Kurian Shaw (pro hac vice)\n Danielle Desaulniers Stempel (pro hac vice)\n 7 Casey Magersupp (pro hac vice)\n 555 13th Street NW\n 8 Washington, DC 20004\n Telephone: (202) 637-5600\n 9 lauren.cury@hlc.com\n anna.shaw@hlc.com\n10 danielle.stempel@hlc.com\n casey.magersupp@hlc.com\n11\n Katherine B. Wellington (pro hac vice)\n12 125 High Street, Suite 2010\n Boston, MA 02110\n13 Telephone: (617) 702-7747\n katherine.wellington@hlc.com\n14\n Gurtej Singh (Bar No. 286547)\n15 Christine Pinnkathok (Bar No. 353430)\n 4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 3500\n16 San Francisco, CA 94111\n Telephone: (415) 374-2300\n17 tej.singh@hlc.com\n christine.pinnkathok@hlc.com\n18\n Attorneys for Defendant NVIDIA Corporation\n19\n UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n20 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA\n21 SAN JOSE DIVISION\n\n22 TED ENTERTAINMENT, Inc., et al., Case No.: 5:25-CV-10287-EJD-SVK\n DEFENDANT NVIDIA CORPORATION\u2019S\n23 Plaintiffs, NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO\n STAY DISCOVERY PENDING RESOLUTION\n24 v. OF MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED\n COMPLAINT; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS\n25 NVIDIA CORPORATION, AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT\n\n26 Defendant. Judge: Hon. Edward J. Davila\n Courtroom: 4, 5th Floor\n27 Hearing Date: August 27, 2026\n Hearing Time: 9:00 am\n28\n\n\n MOT. TO STAY DISCOVERY; CASE NO. 5:25-CV-10287-EJD-SVK\n\f Case 5:25-cv-10287-EJD Document 62 Filed 07/03/26 Page 2 of 13\n\n\n\n 1 NOTICE OF MOTION & MOTION\n\n 2 TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:\n\n 3 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that on August 27, 2026, 1 in Courtroom 4, 280 South 1st\n\n 4 Street, before the Honorable Edward J. Davila, Defendant NVIDIA Corporation (\u201cNVIDIA\u201d) will\n\n 5 and hereby does move this Court for an order staying discovery in this action until NVIDIA\u2019s\n\n 6 pending Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 33) is decided.\n\n 7 This Motion is based on this Notice of Motion and Motion; the following Memorandum of\n\n 8 Points and Authorities in support thereof; all matters of which the Court may take judicial notice;\n\n 9 and such documentary and oral evidence as may be presented at or before the hearing on this\n\n10 Motion.\n\n11\n\n12 Dated: July 3, 2026 Respectfully submitted,\n\n13 By: /s/ Lauren Cury\n14\n HOGAN LOVELLS CADWALADER US LLP\n15 Vassi Iliadis (Bar No. 163450)\n Joe O\u2019Connor (Bar No. 274421)\n16 1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1400\n Los Angeles, CA 90067\n17 Telephone: (310) 785-4600\n vassi.iliadis@hlc.com\n18 joe.oconnor@hlc.com\n\n19 Lauren B. Cury (pro hac vice)\n Anna Kurian Shaw (pro hac vice)\n20 Danielle Desaulniers Stempel (pro hac vice)\n Casey Magersupp (pro hac vice)\n21 555 13th Street NW\n Washington, DC 20004\n22 Telephone: (202) 637-5600\n lauren.cury@hlc.com\n23 anna.shaw@hlc.com\n danielle.stempel@hlc.com\n24 casey.magersupp@hlc.com\n\n25 1\n In light of the proximity of the parties\u2019 conferral to the federal holiday, NVIDIA was unable to\n26\n confirm a hearing date with the Courtroom Deputy. NVIDIA will be prepared to discuss this\n27\n motion at the July 23, 2026 Initial Case Management Conference, and defers to the Court\u2019s\n28\n availability should the Court desire a separate hearing on this motion.\n i\n MOT. TO STAY DISCOVERY; CASE NO. 5:25-CV-10287-EJD-SVK\n\f Case 5:25-cv-10287-EJD Document 62 Filed 07/03/26 Page 3 of 13\n\n\n\n 1\n Katherine B. Wellington (pro hac vice)\n 2 125 High Street, Suite 2010\n Boston, MA 02110\n 3 Telephone: (617) 702-7747\n katherine.wellington@hlc.com\n 4\n Gurtej Singh (Bar No. 286547)\n 5 Christine Pinnkathok (Bar No. 353430)\n 4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 3500\n 6 San Francisco, CA 94111\n Telephone: (415) 374-2300\n 7 tej.singh@hlc.com\n christine.pinnkathok@hlc.com\n 8\n Attorneys for Defendant\n 9\n NVIDIA CORPORATION\n10\n\n11\n\n12\n\n13\n\n14\n\n15\n\n16\n\n17\n\n18\n\n19\n\n20\n\n21\n\n22\n\n23\n\n24\n\n25\n\n26\n\n27\n\n28\n ii\n MOT. TO STAY DISCOVERY; CASE NO. 5:25-CV-10287-EJD-SVK\n\f Case 5:25-cv-10287-EJD Document 62 Filed 07/03/26 Page 4 of 13\n\n\n\n 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS\n\n 2 Page\n\n 3 STATEMENT OF ISSUES TO BE DECIDED .............................................................................. 1\n\n 4 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1\n\n 5 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................. 1\n\n 6 LEGAL STANDARD ...................................................................................................................... 3\n\n 7 ARGUMENT ................................................................................................................................... 3\n\n 8 I. NVIDIA\u2019s Motion to Dismiss Will Dispose of the Entire Case. ......................................... 3\n 9 II. NVIDIA\u2019s Motion to Dismiss Can Be Decided Without Discovery. .................................. 4\n10 III. Staying Discovery Will Promote Judicial Economy and Conserve Party and Third\n11 Party Resources. ................................................................................................................... 5\n\n12 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................ 6\n\n13\n\n14\n\n15\n\n16\n\n17\n\n18\n\n19\n\n20\n\n21\n\n22\n\n23\n\n24\n\n25\n\n26\n\n27\n\n28\n iii\n MOT. TO STAY DISCOVERY; CASE NO. 5:25-CV-10287-EJD-SVK\n\f Case 5:25-cv-10287-EJD Document 62 Filed 07/03/26 Page 5 of 13\n\n\n\n 1 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES\n 2 Page(s)\n 3 Cases\n 4\n Affinity Cr. Union v. Apple Inc.,\n 5 No. 22-cv-04174-JSW, 2023 WL 12065782 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 14, 2023) .................................. 6\n\n 6 Arcell v. Google LLC,\n No. 5:22-CV-02499-EJD, 2022 WL 16557600 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2022) .............................. 4\n 7\n Crema Soc., Inc. v. Apple Inc.,\n 8 No. 25-cv-08905-EKL, 2026 WL 686311 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2026) ..................................... 1\n 9 Garcia v. TDBBS, LLC,\n10 No. 25-CV-00299-AMO, 2025 WL 1755648 (N.D. Cal. June 25, 2025) ................................ 3\n\n11 Glass Egg Digital Media v. Gameloft, Inc.,\n No. 17CV04165MMCRMI, 2019 WL 4166780 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 3, 2019).............................. 5\n12\n Hamilton v. Rhoads,\n13 No. C 11-0227 RMW PR, 2011 WL 5085504 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2011) ................................ 3\n14 Heck v. Amazon.com, Inc.,\n15 No. 22-CV-03986-JSW, 2022 WL 16579372 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2022).................................. 3\n\n16 Little v. City of Seattle,\n 863 F.2d 681 (9th Cir. 1988)..................................................................................................... 3\n17\n In re Nexus 6p Products Liab. Litig.,\n18 No. 17-cv-02185-BLF, 2017 WL 3581188 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2017).................................... 5\n19 Onuoha v. Facebook, Inc.,\n No. 5:16-CV-06440-EJD, 2017 WL 11681325 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 7, 2017) ................................ 4\n20\n\n21 Pereda v. Gen. Motors LLC,\n No. 21-cv-06338, JST, 2022 WL 19692037 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 15, 2022) .............................. 1, 3\n22\n Realtek Semiconductor Corp. v. MediaTek, Inc.,\n23 732 F. Supp. 3d 1101 (N.D. Cal. 2024) .................................................................................... 3\n24 Reveal Chat Holdco, LLC,\n No. 20-cv-00363-BLF, 2020 WL 2843369 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 10, 2020) .................................... 4\n25\n Ted Ent. Inc v. Amazon.com Inc.,\n26\n Case No. 2:26-cv-01134 (W.D. Wash.) .................................................................................... 2\n27\n Ted Ent., Inc. v. Apple, Inc.,\n28 Case No. 3:26-cv-02936 (N.D. Cal.)......................................................................................... 2\n iv\n MOT. TO STAY DISCOVERY; CASE NO. 5:25-CV-10287-EJD-SVK\n\f Case 5:25-cv-10287-EJD Document 62 Filed 07/03/26 Page 6 of 13\n\n\n\n 1 Ted Ent., Inc. v. ByteDance Inc.,\n Case No. 3:25-cv-10933 (N.D. Cal.)......................................................................................... 2\n 2\n Ted Ent., Inc. v. Meta Platforms, Inc.,\n 3\n Case No. 4:25-cv-10931 (N.D. Cal.)......................................................................................... 2\n 4\n Ted Ent., Inc. v. OpenAI Inc.,\n 5 Case No. 3:26-cv-02935 (N.D. Cal.)......................................................................................... 2\n\n 6 Ted Ent., Inc. v. Snap Inc.,\n Case No. 2:26-cv-00754 (C.D. Cal.) ......................................................................................... 2\n 7\n Williams-Sonoma, Inc. v. Last Brand, Inc.,\n 8 No. 5:25-cv-10118-EJD, 2026 WL 1301007 (N.D. Cal. May 12, 2026) ............................. 4, 5\n 9\n Statutes\n10\n 17 U.S.C \u00a7 1201(a)(1) ................................................................................................................. 1, 2\n11\n Other Authorities\n12\n Civil L.R. 7-4(a)(3) ......................................................................................................................... 1\n13\n Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) ................................................................................................................... 2\n14\n S. Rep. No. 105\u2013190 (1998)............................................................................................................ 2\n15\n\n16\n\n17\n\n18\n\n19\n\n20\n\n21\n\n22\n\n23\n\n24\n\n25\n\n26\n\n27\n\n28\n v\n MOT. TO STAY DISCOVERY; CASE NO. 5:25-CV-10287-EJD-SVK\n\f Case 5:25-cv-10287-EJD Document 62 Filed 07/03/26 Page 7 of 13\n\n\n\n 1 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES\n\n 2 STATEMENT OF ISSUES TO BE DECIDED\n\n 3 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-4(a)(3), NVIDIA Corporation states that this Motion to Stay\n\n 4 Discovery raises the following issue to be decided by the Court:\n\n 5 1. Whether discovery should be stayed pending resolution of Defendant NVIDIA\n\n 6 Corporation\u2019s Motion to Dismiss, Dkt. 33, which seeks to dismiss the entirety of Plaintiffs\u2019 First\n\n 7 Amended Complaint.\n\n 8 INTRODUCTION\n\n 9 Defendant NVIDIA Corporation (\u201cNVIDIA\u201d) respectfully moves the Court for a stay of\n\n10 discovery pending resolution of its Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint, Dkt. 33\n\n11 (\u201cMotion\u201d). All relevant factors support staying discovery \u201cuntil Plaintiff[]s plausibly state[] a\n\n12 claim.\u201d Crema Soc., Inc. v. Apple Inc., No. 25-cv-08905-EKL, 2026 WL 686311, at *8 (N.D. Cal.\n\n13 Mar. 11, 2026).\n\n14 First, the Motion to Dismiss may dispose of the entire First Amended Complaint and render\n\n15 discovery unnecessary. NVIDIA \u201craised forceful challenges to the complaint,\u201d identifying multiple\n\n16 independent bases for dismissal of its sole count. Id. Second, \u201cdiscovery is not necessary to\n\n17 determine the legal viability\u201d of Plaintiffs\u2019 claim because the Motion challenges the sufficiency of\n\n18 Plaintiffs\u2019 allegations as a matter of law. Id. Third, considerations of judicial economy and\n\n19 conservation of party and third party resources favor a limited discovery stay. The Motion raises\n\n20 several threshold issues, each of which may independently dispose of Plaintiffs\u2019 claim. \u201c[E]ngaging\n\n21 in discovery prior to adjudication of a strong motion to dismiss would represent a potential waste\n\n22 of resources.\u201d Pereda v. Gen. Motors LLC, No. 21-cv-06338, JST, 2022 WL 19692037, at *1 (N.D.\n\n23 Cal. Mar. 15, 2022) (internal quotations and citation omitted). The Court should accordingly stay\n\n24 discovery until the Motion to Dismiss is resolved.\n\n25 BACKGROUND\n\n26 In late November 2025, Plaintiffs filed this putative class action asserting a single cause of\n\n27 action under the DMCA, 17 U.S.C \u00a7 1201(a)(1). That claim alleges that in downloading videos\n\n28 from YouTube for AI model training, NVIDIA \u201cbypass[ed] technological measures that control\n 1\n MOT. TO STAY DISCOVERY; CASE NO. 5:25-CV-010287-EJD-SK\n\n \\\\4149-5492-6186 v2\n\f Case 5:25-cv-10287-EJD Document 62 Filed 07/03/26 Page 8 of 13\n\n\n\n 1 access to and copying of YouTube videos.\u201d Dkt. 30 (\u201cAm. Compl.\u201d) \u00b6 14. 2\n\n 2 But a Section 1201(a) claim is limited to circumvention of access controls. 17 U.S.C.\n\n 3 \u00a7 1201(a)(1)(A). It does not apply to \u201ccopying,\u201d which Congress explicitly excluded from its\n\n 4 purview. S. Rep. No. 105\u2013190, at 12 (1998) (explaining \u201cthere is no\u201d corresponding \u201cprohibition\u201d\n\n 5 in the DMCA on the circumvention of copy controls). As Plaintiffs concede, YouTube does not\n\n 6 restrict access to their videos, which the public \u201ccan watch and listen to [ ] for free.\u201d Am. Compl.\n\n 7 \u00b6 29. Instead, they base their \u00a7 1201(a) claim on NVIDIA\u2019s alleged downloading of digital copies.\n\n 8 Id. \u00b6 58 (describing all five of the TPMs Plaintiffs accuse NVIDIA of circumventing as designed\n\n 9 \u201cto impede [ ] downloading\u201d).\n\n10 On April 6, 2026, NVIDIA moved to dismiss the entire First Amended Complaint under\n\n11 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). 3 As explained in that Motion, Plaintiffs\u2019 singular claim\n\n12 is subject to dismissal on several independent grounds. First, Plaintiffs cannot maintain an access\n\n13 control circumvention claim where, as here, they have made their works freely accessible to the\n\n14 public. Mot. at 7\u201310. Second, none of the five TPMs alleged by Plaintiffs qualify as access controls\n\n15 as a matter of law. Id. at 11\u201315. Third, each of those alleged TPMs suffer from additional\n\n16 deficiencies with respect to effectiveness, circumvention and/or their conclusory nature. Dkt. 59\n\n17 (\u201cReply\u201d) at 10\u201314. And fourth, Plaintiffs fail to allege when the claimed downloading occurred\n\n18 and which, if any, of the identified TPMs were in place at that time. Id. at 10.\n\n19\n\n20 2\n This case is one of seven separate putative class actions Plaintiffs have filed on these grounds.\n21\n Motions to dismiss are pending in five of those cases, with the response to the complaints in the\n22\n other two cases not yet due. See Ted Ent. Inc v. Amazon.com Inc., Case No. 2:26-cv-01134 (W.D.\n23\n Wash.); Ted Ent., Inc. v. Apple, Inc., Case No. 3:26-cv-02936 (N.D. Cal.); Ted Ent., Inc. v.\n24\n ByteDance Inc., Case No. 3:25-cv-10933 (N.D. Cal.); Ted Ent., Inc. v. Meta Platforms, Inc., Case\n25\n No. 4:25-cv-10931 (N.D. Cal.); Ted Ent., Inc. v. OpenAI Inc., Case No. 3:26-cv-02935 (N.D. Cal.);\n26\n Ted Ent., Inc. v. Snap Inc., Case No. 2:26-cv-00754 (C.D. Cal.).\n27 3\n This was NVIDIA\u2019s second Motion to Dismiss on these grounds. In response to NVIDIA\u2019s first\n28\n Motion to Dismiss, Dkt. 23, Plaintiffs filed the First Amended Complaint, Dkt. 30.\n 2\n MOT. TO STAY DISCOVERY; CASE NO. 5:25-CV-10287-EJD-SVK\n\f Case 5:25-cv-10287-EJD Document 62 Filed 07/03/26 Page 9 of 13\n\n\n\n 1 NVIDIA\u2019s potentially case dispositive motion\u2014which is fully briefed and set to be heard\n\n 2 on July 23, 2026\u2014should be resolved before discovery commences. NVIDIA therefore requests a\n\n 3 stay of discovery until resolution of its Motion to Dismiss.\n\n 4 LEGAL STANDARD\n\n 5 \u201cA district court has broad discretion to stay discovery pending the disposition of a\n\n 6 dispositive motion.\u201d Hamilton v. Rhoads, No. C 11-0227 RMW PR, 2011 WL 5085504, at *1 (N.D.\n\n 7 Cal. Oct. 25, 2011) (citing Little v. City of Seattle, 863 F.2d 681, 685 (9th Cir. 1988)). To determine\n\n 8 whether such a stay should issue, courts in this District apply a two-part test. Realtek Semiconductor\n\n 9 Corp. v. MediaTek, Inc., 732 F. Supp. 3d 1101, 1117 (N.D. Cal. 2024). First, the pending motion\n\n10 \u201cmust be potentially dispositive of the entire case, or at least dispositive on the issue at which\n\n11 discovery is directed.\u201d Id. at 1117\u201318. Second, the pending motion must be capable of resolution\n\n12 without additional discovery. Id. at 1118.\n\n13 In applying this test, the court must take a \u201cpreliminary peek\u201d at the merits of the pending\n\n14 motion to assess whether a stay is warranted. Id. In addition to these two factors, courts in the\n\n15 Ninth Circuit may \u201calso consider whether a stay of discovery will promote efficiency or conserve\n\n16 the parties\u2019 resources, recognizing that engaging in discovery prior to adjudication of a strong\n\n17 motion to dismiss would represent a potential \u2018waste of resources.\u2019\u201d Pereda, 2022 WL 19692037,\n\n18 at *1. All relevant factors support staying discovery until resolution of NVIDIA\u2019s Motion to\n\n19 Dismiss.\n\n20 ARGUMENT\n\n21 I. NVIDIA\u2019s Motion to Dismiss Will Dispose of the Entire Case.\n\n22 The first factor supports a discovery stay because NVIDIA\u2019s pending Motion to Dismiss is\n\n23 \u201cpotentially dispositive of the entire case.\u201d Heck v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. 22-CV-03986-JSW,\n\n24 2022 WL 16579372, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2022) (emphasis in original). Courts routinely find a\n\n25 motion \u201cpotentially dispositive\u201d where, as here, it seeks dismissal of all claims in the action. Heck,\n\n26 2022 WL 16579372, at *2 (finding the first factor satisfied where the defendants sought dismissal\n\n27 of all claims); Garcia v. TDBBS, LLC, No. 25-CV-00299-AMO, 2025 WL 1755648, at *2 (N.D.\n\n28 Cal. June 25, 2025) (same); Williams-Sonoma, Inc. v. Last Brand, Inc., No. 5:25-CV-10118-EJD,\n 3\n MOT. TO STAY DISCOVERY; CASE NO. 5:25-CV-10287-EJD-SVK\n\f Case 5:25-cv-10287-EJD Document 62 Filed 07/03/26 Page 10 of 13\n\n\n\n 1 2026 WL 1301007, at *2 (N.D. Cal. May 12, 2026) (Davila, J.) (same).\n\n 2 NVIDIA\u2019s Motion to Dismiss sets forth multiple independent grounds for dismissal of the\n\n 3 sole claim brought by Plaintiffs. As detailed in the Motion, Plaintiffs\u2019 decision to make their videos\n\n 4 freely accessible to the public is fatal to Plaintiffs\u2019 access control-based claim. Mot. at 7\u201310. So too\n\n 5 are Plaintiffs\u2019 own descriptions of the five TPMs they allege, which, accepted as true, establish that\n\n 6 none of those TPMs qualify as access controls sufficient to support a \u00a7 1201(a) claim. Id. at 11\u201315.\n\n 7 Further, Plaintiffs are unable to establish the effectiveness and/or circumvention of each of those\n\n 8 TPMs. Mot. at 11\u201315. And Plaintiffs fail to allege that any of the alleged TPMs were in effect at\n\n 9 the time of any of the alleged downloading. Id. at 14. In sum, the Motion to Dismiss provides\n\n10 multiple independent bases for dismissal of the singular claim asserted in the Complaint. Thus, the\n\n11 first factor tips in favor of a discovery stay.\n\n12 II. NVIDIA\u2019s Motion to Dismiss Can Be Decided Without Discovery.\n\n13 The second factor supports a stay because no discovery is needed to decide NVIDIA\u2019s\n\n14 Motion to Dismiss, which \u201cis based solely on the allegations in the Complaint and does not raise\n\n15 any factual issues.\u201d Reveal Chat Holdco, LLC, No. 20-cv-00363-BLF, 2020 WL 2843369, at *3\n\n16 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 10, 2020). Indeed, briefing on NVIDIA\u2019s Motion to Dismiss is already complete\n\n17 and is precisely the type of motion the Court has repeatedly found to warrant a stay of discovery.\n\n18 Williams-Sonoma, Inc., 2026 WL 1301007, at *2\u20133 (Davila, J.) (staying discovery because \u201cif the\n\n19 Court grants [defendant\u2019s] Motion in its entirety, it will dispose of all claims\u201d and the motion could\n\n20 be \u201cdecided without additional discovery\u201d); Arcell v. Google LLC, No. 5:22-CV-02499-EJD, 2022\n\n21 WL 16557600, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2022) (Davila, J.) (\u201cDefendants have established that their\n\n22 motion is \u2018potentially dispositive\u2019 of the entire case, which weighs in favor of granting a stay of\n\n23 discovery until the Court issues a ruling on Defendants' motion to dismiss\u201d); Onuoha v. Facebook,\n\n24 Inc., No. 5:16-CV-06440-EJD, 2017 WL 11681325, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 7, 2017) (Davila, J.)\n\n25 (staying discovery pending a decision on motion to dismiss because, if defendant prevailed,\n\n26 \u201cPlaintiffs\u2019 claims will be dismissed\u201d and the motion \u201ccan be decided without further discovery\u201d).\n\n27\n\n28\n 4\n MOT. TO STAY DISCOVERY; CASE NO. 5:25-CV-10287-EJD-SVK\n\f Case 5:25-cv-10287-EJD Document 62 Filed 07/03/26 Page 11 of 13\n\n\n\n 1 III. Staying Discovery Will Promote Judicial Economy and Conserve Party and Third\n\n 2 Party Resources.\n\n 3 Finally, considerations of judicial economy and the conservation of party and third party\n\n 4 resources strongly favor staying discovery until the Motion to Dismiss is resolved.\n\n 5 First, the Motion to Dismiss seeks dismissal of the First Amended Complaint in its entirety,\n\n 6 and if granted, would eliminate any need for discovery. The Motion raises several threshold issues\n\n 7 that Plaintiffs must overcome to establish a claim, including whether they can maintain a \u00a7 1201(a)\n\n 8 claim based on videos which are freely accessible to any member of the public; and whether any\n\n 9 of the five alleged TPMs qualify as access controls under the law. As explained in NVIDIA\u2019s\n\n10 Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiffs cannot, and none are. Mot. at 11\u201315.\n\n11 Second, a stay is warranted to avoid imposing burdensome and potentially unnecessary\n\n12 discovery, including of third parties, before the Court determines whether Plaintiffs have stated a\n\n13 viable DMCA claim. Plaintiffs accuse NVIDIA of downloading \u201cmore than 100 million clips,\u201d\n\n14 Am. Compl. \u00b6 85, and seek to certify a putative class of \u201c[a]ll individuals and entities in the\n\n15 United States whose videos were posted on YouTube and were accessed by Defendant.\u201d Am.\n\n16 Compl. \u00b6 126. Moreover, Plaintiffs intend to seek broad third-party discovery in this case from\n\n17 YouTube, and have indicated an intent to issue separate subpoenas on YouTube in each of the\n\n18 seven cases they have filed. This burdensome and duplicative non-party discovery also weighs in\n\n19 favor of a stay until the Court resolves NVIDIA\u2019s Motion. Glass Egg Digital Media v. Gameloft,\n\n20 Inc., No. 17CV04165MMCRMI, 2019 WL 4166780, at *3 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 3, 2019) (\u201cThis Court\n\n21 is particularly concerned anytime enforcement of a subpoena imposes an economic burden on a\n\n22 non-party.\u201d (citation omitted)). Staying discovery will therefore conserve party, third party, and\n\n23 judicial resources and avoid potentially wasteful discovery into complex technical issues.\n\n24 Williams-Sonoma, 2026 WL 1301007, at *3 (staying discovery where anticipated discovery\n\n25 included extensive ESI and other burdensome discovery).\n\n26 Third, a limited stay would not unduly prejudice Plaintiffs. This case remains in its\n\n27 earliest stages. No trial date has been set. In re Nexus 6p Products Liab. Litig., No. 17-cv-02185-\n\n28 BLF, 2017 WL 3581188, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2017) (finding no undue prejudice where no\n 5\n MOT. TO STAY DISCOVERY; CASE NO. 5:25-CV-10287-EJD-SVK\n\f Case 5:25-cv-10287-EJD Document 62 Filed 07/03/26 Page 12 of 13\n\n\n\n 1 trial date had been set). And the Court has neither \u201centered a scheduling order\u201d nor held a case\n\n 2 management conference. Affinity Credit Union, No. 22-cv-04174-JSW, 2023 WL 12065782, at\n\n 3 *2 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 14, 2023). NVIDIA\u2019s Motion to Dismiss is fully briefed and scheduled to be\n\n 4 heard on July 23, 2026. Under these circumstances, a brief stay will not unduly delay the\n\n 5 litigation but will instead promote the efficient administration of this case while conserving\n\n 6 judicial, party, and third party resources.\n\n 7 CONCLUSION\n\n 8 For the above reasons, the Court should stay discovery until resolution of NVIDIA\u2019s\n\n 9 pending Motion to Dismiss.\n\n10\n Dated: July 3, 2026 Respectfully submitted,\n11\n\n12 By: /s/ Lauren Cury\n13 HOGAN LOVELLS CADWALADER US LLP\n Vassi Iliadis (Bar No. 163450)\n14 Joe O\u2019Connor (Bar No. 274421)\n 1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1400\n15 Los Angeles, CA 90067\n Telephone: (310) 785-4600\n16 vassi.iliadis@hlc.com\n joe.oconnor@hlc.com\n17\n Lauren B. Cury (pro hac vice)\n18 Anna Kurian Shaw (pro hac vice)\n Danielle Desaulniers Stempel (pro hac vice)\n19 Casey Magersupp (pro hac vice)\n 555 13th Street NW\n20 Washington, DC 20004\n Telephone: (202) 637-5600\n21 lauren.cury@hlc.com\n anna.shaw@hlc.com\n22 danielle.stempel@hlc.com\n casey.magersupp@hlc.com\n23\n Katherine B. Wellington (pro hac vice)\n24 125 High Street, Suite 2010\n Boston, MA 02110\n25 Telephone: (617) 702-7747\n katherine.wellington@hlc.com\n26\n Gurtej Singh (Bar No. 286547)\n27 Christine Pinnkathok (Bar No. 353430)\n 4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 3500\n28 San Francisco, CA 94111\n 6\n MOT. TO STAY DISCOVERY; CASE NO. 5:25-CV-10287-EJD-SVK\n\f Case 5:25-cv-10287-EJD Document 62 Filed 07/03/26 Page 13 of 13\n\n\n\n 1 Telephone: (415) 374-2300\n tej.singh@hlc.com\n 2 christine.pinnkathok@hlc.com\n\n 3 Attorneys for Defendant\n NVIDIA CORPORATION\n 4\n\n 5\n\n 6\n\n 7\n\n 8\n\n 9\n\n10\n\n11\n\n12\n\n13\n\n14\n\n15\n\n16\n\n17\n\n18\n\n19\n\n20\n\n21\n\n22\n\n23\n\n24\n\n25\n\n26\n\n27\n\n28\n 7\n MOT. TO STAY DISCOVERY; CASE NO. 5:25-CV-10287-EJD-SVK\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2026-07-06T10:44:25.949027-07:00","document_number":"62","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"035027339411","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":false,"document_type":1,"description":"Stay","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-07-03T16:01:39.538412-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-23T14:02:01.010193-07:00","date_filed":"2026-07-03","time_filed":"15:35:28","entry_number":62,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-07-03.002","pacer_sequence_number":189,"description":"MOTION to Stay Discovery Pending Resolution of Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Nvidia Corporation. Motion Hearing set for 8/27/2026 09:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor before Judge Edward J. Davila. Responses due by 7/17/2026. Replies due by 7/24/2026. (Cury, Lauren) (Filed on 7/3/2026) (Entered: 07/03/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/469703615/","id":469703615,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/71972050/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/485051992/","id":485051992,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/71972050/61/ted-entertainment-inc-v-nvidia-corporation/","date_created":"2026-07-03T15:31:14.213962-07:00","date_modified":"2026-08-10T19:02:48.869620-07:00","sha1":"696fa135dbc439cceccf0038e536fb105ead5c80","page_count":3,"file_size":139462,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.cand.460521/gov.uscourts.cand.460521.61.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cand.460521/gov.uscourts.cand.460521.61.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":" Case 5:25-cv-10287-EJD Document 61 Filed 07/03/26 Page 1 of 3\n\n\n\n 1 HOGAN LOVELLS CADWALADER US LLP\n Vassi Iliadis (Bar No. 163450)\n 2 Joe O\u2019Connor (Bar No. 274421)\n 1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1400\n 3 Los Angeles, CA 90067\n Telephone: (310) 785-4600\n 4 Facsimile: (310) 785-4601\n vassi.iliadis@hlc.com\n 5 joe.oconnor@hlc.com\n\n 6 Lauren B. Cury (pro hac vice)\n Anna Kurian Shaw (pro hac vice)\n 7 Danielle Desaulniers Stempel (pro hac vice)\n Casey Magersupp (pro hac vice)\n 8 555 13th Street NW\n Washington, DC 20004\n 9 Telephone: (202) 637-5600\n lauren.cury@hlc.com\n10 anna.shaw@hlc.com\n danielle.stempel@hlc.com\n11 casey.magersupp@hlc.com\n\n12 Katherine B. Wellington (pro hac vice)\n 125 High Street, Suite 2010\n13 Boston, MA 02110\n Telephone: (617) 702-7747\n14 katherine.wellington@hlc.com\n\n15 Gurtej Singh (Bar No. 286547)\n Christine Pinnkathok (Bar No. 353430)\n16 4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 3500\n San Francisco, CA 94111\n17 Telephone: (415) 374-2300\n tej.singh@hlc.com\n18 christine.pinnkathok@hlc.com\n\n19 Attorneys for Defendant NVIDIA Corporation\n20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n21 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA\n SAN JOSE DIVISION\n22\n TED ENTERTAINMENT, Inc., et al., Case No.: 5:25-CV-10287-EJD-SVK\n23 NOTICE OF FIRM NAME CHANGE AND\n Plaintiffs, UPDATED ATTORNEY CONTACT\n24 INFORMATION\n v.\n25 Judge: Hon. Edward J. Davila\n NVIDIA CORPORATION, Courtroom: 4, 5th Floor\n26 Complaint Filed: November 26, 2025\n Defendant.\n27\n\n28\n\n NOTICE OF FIRM NAME CHANGE AND UPDATED ATTORNEY CONTACT INFORMATION; CASE NO. 5:25-\n CV-10287-EJD-SVK\n\f Case 5:25-cv-10287-EJD Document 61 Filed 07/03/26 Page 2 of 3\n\n\n\n 1 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE of a law firm name change and updated contact information for\n\n 2 the following counsel for Defendant NVIDIA Corporation:\n\n 3\n HOGAN LOVELLS CADWALADER US LLP\n 4 Vassi Iliadis\n Joe O\u2019Connor\n 5 1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1400\n Los Angeles, CA 90067\n 6 Telephone: (310) 785-4600\n Facsimile: (310) 785-4601\n 7 vassi.iliadis@hlc.com\n joe.oconnor@hlc.com\n 8\n\n 9 Lauren B. Cury (Pro Hac Vice)\n Anna Kurian Shaw (Pro Hac Vice)\n10 Danielle Desaulniers Stempel (Pro Hac Vice)\n Casey Magersupp (Pro Hac Vice)\n11 555 13th Street NW\n Washington, DC 20004\n12 Telephone: (202) 637-5600\n lauren.cury@hlc.com\n13 anna.shaw@hlc.com\n danielle.stempel@hlc.com\n14 casey.magersupp@hlc.com\n\n15 Katherine B. Wellington (pro hac vice)\n 125 High Street, Suite 2010\n16 Boston, MA 02110\n Telephone: (617) 702-7747\n17 katherine.wellington@hlc.com\n\n18 Gurtej Singh\n Christine Pinnkathok\n19 4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 3500\n San Francisco, CA 94111\n20 Telephone: (415) 374-2300\n tej.singh@hlc.com\n21 christine.pinnkathok@hlc.com\n\n22\n\n23\n\n24\n\n25\n\n26\n\n27\n\n28\n 1\n NOTICE OF FIRM NAME CHANGE AND UPDATED ATTORNEY CONTACT INFORMATION; CASE NO. 5:25-\n CV-10287-EJD-SVK\n\f Case 5:25-cv-10287-EJD Document 61 Filed 07/03/26 Page 3 of 3\n\n\n\n 1 Dated: July 3, 2026 Respectfully submitted,\n 2\n By: /s/ Lauren Cury\n 3\n HOGAN LOVELLS CADWALADER US LLP\n 4 Vassi Iliadis (Bar No. 163450)\n Joe O\u2019Connor (Bar No. 274421)\n 5 1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1400\n Los Angeles, CA 90067\n 6 Telephone: (310) 785-4600\n Facsimile: (310) 785-4601\n 7 vassi.iliadis@hlc.com\n joe.oconnor@hlc.com\n 8\n Lauren B. Cury (pro hac vice)\n 9 Anna Kurian Shaw (pro hac vice)\n Danielle Desaulniers Stempel (pro hac vice)\n10 Casey Magersupp (pro hac vice)\n 555 13th Street NW\n11 Washington, DC 20004\n Telephone: (202) 637-5600\n12 lauren.cury@hlc.com\n anna.shaw@hlc.com\n13 danielle.stempel@hlc.com\n casey.magersupp@hlc.com\n14\n Katherine B. Wellington (pro hac vice)\n15 125 High Street, Suite 2010\n Boston, MA 02110\n16 Telephone: (617) 702-7747\n katherine.wellington@hlc.com\n17\n Gurtej Singh (Bar No. 286547)\n18 Christine Pinnkathok (Bar No. 353430)\n 4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 3500\n19 San Francisco, CA 94111\n Telephone: (415) 374-2300\n20 tej.singh@hlc.com\n christine.pinnkathok@hlc.com\n21\n Attorneys for Defendant\n22 NVIDIA CORPORATION\n23\n\n24\n\n25\n\n26\n\n27\n\n28\n 2\n NOTICE OF FIRM NAME CHANGE AND UPDATED ATTORNEY CONTACT INFORMATION; CASE NO. 5:25-\n CV-10287-EJD-SVK\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2026-07-12T15:52:22.289326-07:00","document_number":"61","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"035027339402","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":false,"document_type":1,"description":"Notice (Other)","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-07-03T15:31:14.186651-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-23T14:02:00.928844-07:00","date_filed":"2026-07-03","time_filed":"15:24:50","entry_number":61,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-07-03.001","pacer_sequence_number":187,"description":"NOTICE by Nvidia Corporation Notice of Firm Name Change and Updated Attorney Contact Information for NVIDIA Corporation (Cury, Lauren) (Filed on 7/3/2026) (Entered: 07/03/2026)","tags":[]}],"entries_total":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/?count=on&docket=71972050&page_size=40"}