{"cached_at":"2026-09-28T09:54:41.995389+00:00","cl_docket_id":"64904094","docket":{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","id":64904094,"court":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/courts/cod/","court_id":"cod","original_court_info":null,"idb_data":null,"clusters":["https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/clusters/9627666/"],"audio_files":[],"assigned_to":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/people/2068/","referred_to":null,"bankruptcy_information":null,"absolute_url":"/docket/64904094/wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc/","date_created":"2022-08-18T13:33:05.321653-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-03T04:30:48.036573-07:00","source":1,"appeal_from_str":"","assigned_to_str":"William J. Martinez","referred_to_str":"Cyrus Y. Chung","panel_str":"","date_last_index":"2024-12-10T03:37:51.628850-08:00","date_cert_granted":null,"date_cert_denied":null,"date_argued":null,"date_reargued":null,"date_reargument_denied":null,"date_filed":"2022-08-17","date_terminated":"2025-02-20","date_last_filing":"2026-04-30","case_name_short":"Wang","case_name":"Wang v. Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc.","case_name_full":"","slug":"wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc","docket_number":"1:22-cv-02105","docket_number_core":"2202105","docket_number_raw":"1:22-cv-02105","docket_number_source":0,"federal_dn_office_code":"1","federal_dn_case_type":"cv","federal_dn_judge_initials_assigned":"WJM","federal_dn_judge_initials_referred":"CYC","federal_defendant_number":null,"pacer_case_id":"217587","cause":"15:0078j(b)ss - Stockholder Suit","nature_of_suit":"850 Securities, Commodities, Exchange","jury_demand":"Plaintiff","jurisdiction_type":"Federal Question","appellate_fee_status":"","appellate_case_type_information":"","mdl_status":"","filepath_ia":"","filepath_ia_json":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"ia_needs_upload":true,"ia_date_first_change":"2022-08-18T13:33:05.320027-07:00","date_blocked":null,"blocked":false,"appeal_from":null,"parent_docket":null,"tags":[],"panel":[]},"parties":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/14332432/","id":14332432,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9659417/","attorney_id":9659417,"date_action":"2024-03-14","docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"role":6},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9659417/","attorney_id":9659417,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9659418/","attorney_id":9659418,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"name":"Defendant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2024-07-04T20:55:45.229439-07:00","date_modified":"2024-07-04T20:55:45.229449-07:00","name":"Richard B. Giles","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/14332431/","id":14332431,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9659416/","attorney_id":9659416,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"name":"Defendant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2024-07-04T20:55:45.188421-07:00","date_modified":"2024-07-04T20:55:45.188431-07:00","name":"Philip H. Coelho","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/14332430/","id":14332430,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9659413/","attorney_id":9659413,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9659414/","attorney_id":9659414,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9659415/","attorney_id":9659415,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"name":"Defendant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2024-07-04T20:55:45.106936-07:00","date_modified":"2024-07-04T20:55:45.106947-07:00","name":"David Bar-Or","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/14332429/","id":14332429,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9659412/","attorney_id":9659412,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"name":"Defendant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2024-07-04T20:55:45.075721-07:00","date_modified":"2024-07-04T20:55:45.075730-07:00","name":"Dan Stokely","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/12107741/","id":12107741,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8073184/","attorney_id":8073184,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8698856/","attorney_id":8698856,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8698857/","attorney_id":8698857,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"name":"Movant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]},{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"name":"Plaintiff","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2022-11-22T22:54:27.099758-08:00","date_modified":"2022-11-22T22:54:27.099768-08:00","name":"SynWorld Technologies Corporation","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/12107740/","id":12107740,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8073184/","attorney_id":8073184,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8698856/","attorney_id":8698856,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8698857/","attorney_id":8698857,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"name":"Movant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]},{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"name":"Plaintiff","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2022-11-22T22:54:27.069713-08:00","date_modified":"2022-11-22T22:54:27.069724-08:00","name":"Tao Wang","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/12107739/","id":12107739,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8073183/","attorney_id":8073183,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"name":"Movant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2022-11-22T22:54:27.055154-08:00","date_modified":"2022-11-22T22:54:27.055164-08:00","name":"Punit Kohli","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/12107738/","id":12107738,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8073182/","attorney_id":8073182,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"name":"Movant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2022-11-22T22:54:27.002080-08:00","date_modified":"2022-11-22T22:54:27.002090-08:00","name":"Matthew Shipley","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/12107737/","id":12107737,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8073181/","attorney_id":8073181,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"name":"Movant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2022-11-22T22:54:26.861649-08:00","date_modified":"2022-11-22T22:54:26.861659-08:00","name":"Lynn Hedeman","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/12107736/","id":12107736,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8073180/","attorney_id":8073180,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"name":"Movant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2022-11-22T22:54:26.808546-08:00","date_modified":"2022-11-22T22:54:26.808560-08:00","name":"Padme Management Corp.","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/12107735/","id":12107735,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8073179/","attorney_id":8073179,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"name":"Movant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2022-11-22T22:54:26.792648-08:00","date_modified":"2022-11-22T22:54:26.792657-08:00","name":"Justin Keister","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/11861614/","id":11861614,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8073178/","attorney_id":8073178,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"name":"Defendant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2022-08-23T04:36:54.084629-07:00","date_modified":"2022-08-23T04:36:54.084644-07:00","name":"Holli Cherevka","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/11861613/","id":11861613,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8073177/","attorney_id":8073177,"date_action":"2023-09-27","docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"role":6}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"name":"Defendant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2022-08-23T04:36:54.077585-07:00","date_modified":"2022-08-23T04:36:54.077597-07:00","name":"Michael Macaluso","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/11861612/","id":11861612,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8073175/","attorney_id":8073175,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8073176/","attorney_id":8073176,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"name":"Defendant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2022-08-23T04:36:54.071861-07:00","date_modified":"2022-08-23T04:36:54.071875-07:00","name":"Michael A. Martino","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/11861611/","id":11861611,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8073175/","attorney_id":8073175,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8073176/","attorney_id":8073176,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"name":"Defendant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2022-08-23T04:36:54.066025-07:00","date_modified":"2022-08-23T04:36:54.066038-07:00","name":"Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc.","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/11861610/","id":11861610,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7877760/","attorney_id":7877760,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","docket_id":64904094,"name":"Plaintiff","date_terminated":"2023-10-16","extra_info":"Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated\nTERMINATED: 10/16/2023","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2022-08-23T04:36:54.040211-07:00","date_modified":"2022-08-23T04:36:54.040225-07:00","name":"Christopher Kain","extra_info":""}],"entries":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/468604072/","id":468604072,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/483905987/","id":483905987,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/64904094/116/wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc/","date_created":"2026-06-24T12:55:22.008942-07:00","date_modified":"2026-06-24T12:55:22.016620-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"116","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-06-24T12:55:21.977775-07:00","date_modified":"2026-06-24T12:55:21.986413-07:00","date_filed":"2026-04-30","time_filed":null,"entry_number":116,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-04-30.002","pacer_sequence_number":null,"description":"ORDER granting 115 Lead Plaintiffs' Motion to Correct Date in the Order Granting Lead Plaintiffs' Motion for Distribution of the Net Settlement Fund (ECF No. 114) Nunc Pro Tunc (\"Motion\"). The Lead Plaintiffs' Motion is granted for good cause shown. The Court will issue an Amended Distribution Order separately. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 4/30/2026. Text Only Entry(wjmja, ) (Entered: 04/30/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/468604071/","id":468604071,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/483905986/","id":483905986,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/64904094/113/wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc/","date_created":"2026-06-24T12:55:21.734504-07:00","date_modified":"2026-06-24T12:55:21.747308-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"113","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"039012507821","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-06-24T12:55:21.700387-07:00","date_modified":"2026-06-24T12:55:21.712829-07:00","date_filed":"2026-02-26","time_filed":null,"entry_number":113,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-02-26.001","pacer_sequence_number":322,"description":"NOTICE re 110 MOTION for Order to Distribute the Net Settlement Fund; and Memorandum of Law in Support Defendant Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s Notice of Non-Opposition to Motion to Distribute the Net Settlement Fund 110 by Defendant Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Compton, Patrick) (Entered: 02/26/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/468604070/","id":468604070,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/483905985/","id":483905985,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/64904094/112/wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc/","date_created":"2026-06-24T12:55:21.674007-07:00","date_modified":"2026-06-24T12:55:21.681463-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"112","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-06-24T12:55:21.639115-07:00","date_modified":"2026-06-24T12:55:21.646961-07:00","date_filed":"2026-02-25","time_filed":null,"entry_number":112,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-02-25.001","pacer_sequence_number":null,"description":"ORDER. This matter is before the Court on Lead Plaintiffs SynWorld Technologies Corporation and Tao Wang\u2019s Motion for Order to Distribute the Net Settlement Fund (\u201cMotion\u201d) 110 . To the extent they wish to be heard on any matter raised in the Motion, Defendants may file a response by no later than February 27, 2026. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 2/25/2026. Text Only Entry (wjmlc5, ) (Entered: 02/25/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/468604069/","id":468604069,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/483905984/","id":483905984,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/64904094/111/wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc/","date_created":"2026-06-24T12:55:21.616346-07:00","date_modified":"2026-08-13T01:42:36.496612-07:00","sha1":"292325f4be1722ed1c5e5c5b20de26777b43e02d","page_count":18,"file_size":339352,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.111.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.111.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":2,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 1 of 18\n\n\n\n\n IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n\n FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO\n\n TAO WANG and SYNWORLD\n TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION,\n Individually and on Behalf of All Others Case No.: 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-MEH\n Similarly Situated,\n\n Plaintiffs, DECLARATION OF MEGAN TODD IN\n SUPPORT OF LEAD PLAINTIFFS\u2019\n v. MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF\n DISTRIBUTION OF NET\n AMPIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. SETTLEMENT FUND\n MICHAEL A. MARTINO,\n MICHAEL MACALUSO,\n HOLLI CHEREVKA,\n DAN STOKELY\n DAVID BAR-OR,\n PHILIP H. COELHO, and\n RICHARD B. GILES,\n\n Defendants.\n\n\n I, MEGAN TODD, declare as follows:\n\n 1. I am employed as a Project Manager by Simpluris, Inc. (\u201cSimpluris\u201d), the claims\n\nadministrator in the above-entitled action. Our corporate office address is 3194-C Airport Loop\n\nDr., Costa Mesa, CA 92626. I am over twenty-one years of age and authorized to make this\ndeclaration on behalf of Simpluris and myself. I have personal knowledge of the information set\n\nforth herein.\n\n 2. Simpluris was retained by Plaintiffs\u2019 Counsel to serve as the Claims Administrator\n\nin connection with the Settlement of the above-captioned action (the \u201cLitigation\u201d).1 By the Order\n\nGranting Lead Plaintiffs\u2019 Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement\n\ndated September 24, 2024 (the \u201cPreliminary Approval Order\u201d), the Court appointed Simpluris as\n\n\n1\n All terms with initial capitalizations not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the\nStipulation and Agreement of Settlement dated May 13, 2024.\n Page 1 of 18\n DECLARATION OF MEGAN TODD IN SUPPORT OF LEAD PLAINTIFFS\u2019 MOTION FOR\n APPROVAL OF DISTRIBUTION OF NET SETTLEMENT FUND\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 2 of 18\n\n\n\n\nClaims Administrator. As Claims Administrator, Simpluris has, among other things: (i) mailed the\n\nPostcard Notice to potential Class Members, brokers, and other nominees; (ii) provided, upon\n\nrequest, additional copies of the Postcard Notice to potential Class Members, brokers, and other\n\nnominees; (iii) caused the Publication Notice to be published; (iv) created and continues to\n\nmaintain a settlement website and posted case-specific documents to the website, including the\n\nNotice of Pendency of Class Action Settlement (the \u201cNotice\u201d) and the Proof of Claim and Release\n\nForm (the \u201cProof of Claim\u201d); (v) created and continues to maintain a toll-free helpline for inquiries\n\nduring the course of the settlement administration; and (vi) received and processed Proofs of\nClaim.\n\n 3. On February 20, 2025, the Court entered the Final Order and Judgment Approving\n\nClass Action Settlement. Simpluris has completed processing all Proofs of Claim received through\n\nJanuary 30, 2026, and hereby submits its administrative determinations accepting and rejecting the\n\nProofs of Claim in preparation for a distribution of the Net Settlement Fund to Authorized\n\nClaimants. Simpluris also presents this declaration in support of Lead Plaintiffs\u2019 motion for\n\napproval of a distribution plan for the Net Settlement Fund.\n\n DISSEMINATION OF NOTICES TO POTENTIAL CLASS MEMBERS\n\n 4. Pursuant to the Preliminary Approval Order, beginning on October 15, 2024,\n\nSimpluris distributed the Postcard Notice to potential members of the Class. As more fully\n\ndescribed in the Declaration of Anne-Marie Marra of Simpluris Regarding Notice and Settlement\n\nAdministration (the \u201cMarra Declaration\u201d), dated December 20, 2024, as of December 20, 2024,\n\nSimpluris had mailed 21,714 Postcard Notices to potential Class Members, brokers, and other\n\nnominees. Since December 20, 2024, 7,791 additional Postcard Notices have been mailed. In total,\n\nSimpluris has mailed 29,505 Postcard Notices, or where requested, copies of the Notice and Proof\n\nof Claim form, to potential Class Members, brokers, and other nominees.\n\n\n\n\n Page 2 of 18\n DECLARATION OF MEGAN TODD IN SUPPORT OF LEAD PLAINTIFFS\u2019 MOTION FOR\n APPROVAL OF DISTRIBUTION OF NET SETTLEMENT FUND\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 3 of 18\n\n\n\n\n 5. Pursuant to the terms of the Preliminary Approval Order, Simpluris caused the\n\nPublication Notice to appear once in Investor\u2019s Business Daily and to be issued as a national Press\n\nRelease on October 28, 2024. See Marra Declaration \u00b6\u00b615-16.\n\n WEBSITE AND CONTACT CENTER\n\n 6. Simpluris established and continues to maintain a Settlement website\n\n(www.AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com), a toll-free telephone helpline (833-602-5027) and two\n\n(2) email inboxes (info@AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com and\n\nbroker@AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com) dedicated to the Settlement to assist potential Class\nMembers, and a Settlement P.O. Box for receipt of Proofs of Claim and correspondences. The\n\nSettlement website and contact center resources enable Class Members to obtain information about\n\nthe Settlement; provide access to important dates relevant to the Settlement, including the\n\nexclusion, objection, and claim filing deadlines; provide access to important documents relevant\n\nto the Settlement, including the Notice, a downloadable paper version of the Proof of Claim, and\n\nan online Proof of Claim module where Class Members and nominees were able to submit their\n\nclaims electronically.\n\n PROCEDURES FOLLOWED IN PROCESSING PROOFS OF CLAIM\n\n 7. Under the terms of the Preliminary Approval Order and as set forth in the Notice,\n\neach Class Member who wished to be eligible to receive a distribution from the Net Settlement\n\nFund was required to complete and submit to Simpluris a properly executed Proof of Claim\n\npostmarked no later than, or submitted online by, January 13, 2025, together with adequate\n\nsupporting documentation for the transactions and holdings reported therein. Through January 30,\n\n2026, Simpluris has received 24,159 Proofs of Claim. 24,120 Proofs of Claim were received on or\n\nbefore January 13, 2025. An additional 39 claims were received late but otherwise processed in\n\naccordance with the procedures outlined below. All 24,159 Proofs of Claim have been fully\n\nprocessed.\n\n\n\n Page 3 of 18\n DECLARATION OF MEGAN TODD IN SUPPORT OF LEAD PLAINTIFFS\u2019 MOTION FOR\n APPROVAL OF DISTRIBUTION OF NET SETTLEMENT FUND\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 4 of 18\n\n\n\n\n 8. In preparation for receiving and processing Proofs of Claim, Simpluris: (i)\n\nconferred with Plaintiffs\u2019 Counsel to define the project guidelines for processing Proofs of Claim;\n\n(ii) created a unique database to store Proof of Claim details and images of Proofs of Claim and\n\nsupporting documentation; (iii) trained staff in the specifics of the project so that Proofs of Claim\n\nwould be properly processed; (iv) formulated a system so that telephone and email inquiries would\n\nbe properly responded to; (v) developed various computer applications for entry of Class\n\nMembers\u2019 identifying information, as well as their transactional information; and, (vi) developed\n\na proprietary calculation module that would calculate Recognized Loss pursuant to the Court\napproved Plan of Allocation of Net Settlement Fund Among Class Members set forth in the Notice.\n\n 9. The Notice directed Settlement Class Members, brokers, and other nominees\n\nseeking to share in the Net Settlement Fund to submit their Proof of Claim forms to the P.O. Box\n\naddress specifically designated for the Settlement, to upload their Proof of Claim forms online\n\nthrough the Settlement website, or to submit claims to the Simpluris team that handles large\n\nelectronic filing operations (the \u201cSecurities Team\u201d). All physical and electronic correspondence\n\nreceived have been reviewed and, where necessary, appropriate responses have been provided to\n\nthe senders.\n\n PROCESSING PAPER PROOFS OF CLAIM\n\n 10. Of the 24,159 Proofs of Claim received by Simpluris through January 30, 2026,\n\n110 were paper Proofs of Claim. Once received, these Proofs of Claim were opened and prepared\n\nfor scanning. This process included unfolding documents, removing staples, copying\n\nnonconforming sized documents, sorting documents, and, where claimant identification\n\ninformation was not provided on the Proof of Claim, copying and attaching the envelope with the\n\nreturn address to the file.\n\n 11. Following this manual preparation, the paper Proofs of Claim were scanned into a\n\ndatabase together with all accompanying documentation. Subsequently, each Proof of Claim was\n\nassigned a unique Proof of Claim number (a \u201cResponse ID\u201d). Once scanned, the information from\n\n Page 4 of 18\n DECLARATION OF MEGAN TODD IN SUPPORT OF LEAD PLAINTIFFS\u2019 MOTION FOR\n APPROVAL OF DISTRIBUTION OF NET SETTLEMENT FUND\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 5 of 18\n\n\n\n\neach Proof of Claim, including the name, address, and the Claimant\u2019s account number/information\n\nfrom his, her, or its supporting documentation, and the Claimant\u2019s purchase/acquisition\n\ntransactions, sale transactions, and holdings listed on the Proof of Claim, was entered into a\n\ndatabase developed by Simpluris to process Proofs of Claim submitted for the Settlement. Next,\n\nthe documentation provided by each Claimant in support of his, her, or its Proof of Claim was\n\nreviewed to determine: (i) whether the Claimant traded in Ampio Pharmaceuticals (\u201cAMPE\u201d)\n\ncommon stock during the Class Period; (ii) whether the transaction information entered on the\n\nProof of Claim was supported by the documentation; (iii) that the Claimant did not have any\nadditional trades not reflected on his, her, or its Proof of Claim; (iv) that the name of the Claimant\n\nmatched the information on the trade documentation, or additional documentation was provided\n\nto support any name changes; and, (v) that the beneficial owner listed on the trade documentation,\n\nor a legal representative thereof, signed the Proof of Claim.\n\n 12. In order to process the transactions detailed on the Proofs of Claim, Simpluris\n\nidentified and classified any deficiency or ineligibility conditions that existed within those Proofs\n\nof Claim. The appropriate deficiencies were assigned to the Proofs of Claim as they were\n\nprocessed. For example, where a Proof of Claim was submitted by a Claimant who did not have\n\nany eligible transactions in AMPE common stock during the Class Period (e.g., the Claimant\n\npurchased AMPE common stock only before or after the Class Period), that Proof of Claim would\n\nreceive a defect code that denoted ineligibility. Similar defect codes were used to denote other\n\nconditions of ineligibility, such as duplicate Proofs of Claim. These defect codes indicate to\n\nSimpluris that the Claimant is not eligible to receive any payment from the Net Settlement Fund\n\nwith respect to that Proof of Claim, unless the deficiency is cured in its entirety.\n\n 13. Because a Proof of Claim may be deficient only in part, but otherwise acceptable,\n\nSimpluris utilizes defect codes that are only applied to specific transactions contained within a\n\nProof of Claim. For example, if a Claimant submitted a Proof of Claim with supporting\n\ndocumentation for all but one purchase transaction, that one transaction would receive a\n\n Page 5 of 18\n DECLARATION OF MEGAN TODD IN SUPPORT OF LEAD PLAINTIFFS\u2019 MOTION FOR\n APPROVAL OF DISTRIBUTION OF NET SETTLEMENT FUND\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 6 of 18\n\n\n\n\ntransaction-specific deficiency. This indicates that one transaction was deficient, but that the Proof\n\nof Claim was otherwise eligible for payment if other transactions in the Proof of Claim calculated\n\nto a Recognized Loss according to the Plan of Allocation. Thus, even if the deficiency was never\n\ncured, the Proof of Claim could still be partially accepted.\n\n PROCESSING ELECTRONICALLY FILED PROOFS OF CLAIM\n\n 14. Of the 24,159 Proofs of Claim received by Simpluris through January 30, 2026,\n\n24,025 were filed electronically (\u201cElectronic Claims\u201d). Electronic Claims are typically submitted\n\nby institutional investors who may have hundreds, thousands, or even millions of transactions\nduring the Class Period. Institutional investors filing Electronic Claims either submit \u201cbulk\u201d Proofs\n\nof Claim through a dedicated module on the Settlement website or electronically submit a file to\n\nSimpluris\u2019s broker@AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com email inbox so that Simpluris may\n\nelectronically upload all transactions to its proprietary database developed for the Settlement.\n\n 15. Simpluris maintains a Securities Team which coordinates and supervises the receipt\n\nand handling of all Electronic Claims. In this case, the Securities Team reviewed and analyzed\n\neach electronic file to ensure that it was formatted in accordance with Simpluris\u2019s required format,\n\nand to identify any potential data issues or inconsistencies within the file. When any issues or\n\ninconsistencies arose, Simpluris notified the sender. If the electronic file was deemed to be in an\n\nacceptable format, it was then loaded to Simpluris\u2019s database.\n\n 16. Once the file was loaded, the Electronic Claims were labeled to identify them as\n\nElectronic Claims and defect codes were applied to denote any deficiencies or ineligible conditions\n\nthat existed within them. These defect codes are similar to those applied to paper Proofs of Claim.\n\nIn lieu of manually applying defect codes, the Securities Team performed programmatic reviews\n\non Electronic Claims to identify deficient and ineligible conditions (such as, but not limited to,\n\nprice per share/net amount validation issues, out of balance conditions, and transactions outside\n\nthe Class Period, etc.). The output was thoroughly verified and confirmed as accurate.\n\n\n\n Page 6 of 18\n DECLARATION OF MEGAN TODD IN SUPPORT OF LEAD PLAINTIFFS\u2019 MOTION FOR\n APPROVAL OF DISTRIBUTION OF NET SETTLEMENT FUND\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 7 of 18\n\n\n\n\n 17. The review process also included flagging any Electronic Claims that were not\n\naccompanied by sufficient authorization documentation for all accounts referenced on the\n\nelectronic file submitted by any broker/nominee. This process was reviewed by Simpluris\u2019s\n\nSecurities Team and, where appropriate, Simpluris contacted the institutional filer whose\n\nelectronic files were missing information. This ensures that all claims are submitted by properly\n\nauthorized representatives of the Claimants.\n\n 18. Finally, at the end of the process, Simpluris performed various targeted reviews of\n\nElectronic Claims. Specifically, Simpluris used criteria such as the calculated Recognized Loss\nand other identified criteria to flag and reach out to a number of electronic filers and request that\n\nvarious sample purchases, sales, and holdings selected by Simpluris be documented by providing\n\nconfirmation slips or other transaction-specific supporting documentation. These targeted reviews\n\nhelp to ensure that electronic data supplied by Claimants does not contain inaccurate information.\n\nSimpluris also performed additional targeted reviews in connection with the largest claims.\n\n EXCLUDED PERSONS\n\n 19. Simpluris reviewed all Proofs of Claim to ensure that they were not submitted by,\n\nor on behalf of, \u201cExcluded Persons\u201d to the extent that the identities of such persons or entities were\n\nknown to Simpluris through the list of Defendants, and other excluded persons and entities set\n\nforth in the Stipulation and the Notice, and through the Claimants\u2019 certifications on the Proofs of\n\nClaim.\n\n COMPLEXITIES ENCOUNTERED IN CLAIMS PROCESSING\n\n 20. Many of the Proofs of Claim Simpluris received were deficient or ineligible for one\n\nor more reasons, and therefore, were subjected to the additional processing, correspondence, and\n\ntelephonic communications described in the sections below entitled \u201cThe Deficiency Process for\n\nPaper Proofs of Claim\u201d and \u201cThe Deficiency Process for Electronic Proofs of Claim.\u201d\n\n 21. During the processing of Proofs of Claim, Simpluris encountered non-conforming\n\nProofs of Claim, which, in general, require significantly more work than ordinary Proofs of Claim\n\n Page 7 of 18\n DECLARATION OF MEGAN TODD IN SUPPORT OF LEAD PLAINTIFFS\u2019 MOTION FOR\n APPROVAL OF DISTRIBUTION OF NET SETTLEMENT FUND\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 8 of 18\n\n\n\n\nbecause of the information contained in or missing from the Proof of Claim or the manner in which\n\nthe Proof of Claim was completed. Non-conforming claims include, among other conditions,\n\nmissing pages, no name or address, Proofs of Claim that are blank, but submitted with\n\ndocumentation for Simpluris to manually review or enter into the database, and Proofs of Claim\n\nthat are so materially deficient as to make what is being claimed unrecognizable.\n\n THE DEFICIENCY PROCESS FOR PAPER PROOFS OF CLAIM\n\n 22. Approximately 22 of the 110 paper Proofs of Claim, or approximately 20% of the\n\npaper Proofs of Claim submitted, were incomplete or had one or more defects or conditions of\nineligibility, such as the Proof of Claim not being signed or not properly documented. Much of\n\nSimpluris\u2019s efforts in handling an administration involve claimant communications so that all\n\nclaimants have sufficient opportunity to cure any deficiencies and file a complete Proof of Claim.\n\nThe Deficiency Process, which primarily involved mailing and/or emailing a Notice of Defective\n\nClaim (\u201cDeficiency Notice\u201d) to Claimants and subsequently handling and responding to calls,\n\ncorrespondence, and emails from Claimants was intended to assist Claimants in properly\n\ncompleting their deficient submissions so that they would be eligible to participate in the\n\nSettlement. As a result of this process, a number of claimants, excluding those who submitted\n\nProofs of Claim with incurable deficiencies, are now eligible to participate in the Settlement.\n\n 23. If a Proof of Claim was determined to be defective or ineligible, a Deficiency\n\nNotice was sent to the Claimant describing the defect(s) or condition(s) of ineligibility in his, her,\n\nor its Proof of Claim and what was necessary to cure any curable defect(s) in the Proof of Claim.\n\nThe Deficiency Notice advised the Claimant that the submission of the appropriate information\n\nand/or trade documentation required to complete the Proof of Claim had to be sent within twenty\n\none (21) days from the date of the letter, or the Proof of Claim would be recommended for either\n\nfull or partial rejection to the extent the deficiency or condition of ineligibility remained on the\n\nProof of Claim. Simpluris sent a total of 22 Deficiency Notices to Claimants. Attached hereto as\n\n\n\n Page 8 of 18\n DECLARATION OF MEGAN TODD IN SUPPORT OF LEAD PLAINTIFFS\u2019 MOTION FOR\n APPROVAL OF DISTRIBUTION OF NET SETTLEMENT FUND\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 9 of 18\n\n\n\n\nExhibit A are examples of the Deficiency Notice encompassing both curable defects and\n\ndescribing conditions of ineligibility.\n\n 24. Claimants\u2019 responses to the Deficiency Notices were scanned and imported into\n\nSimpluris\u2019s database and associated with the corresponding Proof of Claim. The responses were\n\nthen carefully reviewed and evaluated by Simpluris\u2019s Securities Team. If a Claimant\u2019s response\n\ncorrected the defect(s), Simpluris updated the database to reflect the change in status of the Proof\n\nof Claim. As a result of this process, two (2) previously defective claims have been cured and are\n\nnow recommended as eligible for participation in the settlement.\n THE DEFICIENCY PROCESS FOR ELECTRONIC PROOFS OF CLAIM\n\n 25. Approximately, 95 of the 262 Electronic Claims submitted by individual Claimants,\n\nor approximately 36%, were incomplete or had one or more defects or conditions of ineligibility,\n\nsuch as the Proof of Claim not being properly supported. If a Proof of Claim was determined to be\n\ndefective or ineligible, a Deficiency Notice was sent to the Claimant describing the defect(s) or\n\ncondition(s) of ineligibility in his, her, or its Proof of Claim and what was necessary to cure any\n\ncurable defect(s) in the Proof of Claim. The Deficiency Notice advised the Claimant that the\n\nsubmission of the appropriate information and/or trade documentation required to complete the\n\nProof of Claim had to be sent within twenty one (21) days from the date of the letter, or the Proof\n\nof Claim would be recommended for either full or partial rejection to the extent the deficiency or\n\ncondition of ineligibility remained on the Proof of Claim. Simpluris sent a total of 95 Deficiency\n\nNotices to Claimants.\n\n 26. Claimants\u2019 responses to the Deficiency Notices were scanned and imported into\n\nSimpluris\u2019s database and associated with the corresponding Proof of Claim. The responses were\n\nthen carefully reviewed and evaluated by Simpluris\u2019s Securities Team. If a Claimant\u2019s response\n\ncorrected the defect(s), Simpluris updated the database to reflect the change in status of the Proof\n\nof Claim. As a result of this process, eight (8) previously defective claims have been cured and are\n\nnow recommended as eligible for participation in the settlement.\n\n Page 9 of 18\n DECLARATION OF MEGAN TODD IN SUPPORT OF LEAD PLAINTIFFS\u2019 MOTION FOR\n APPROVAL OF DISTRIBUTION OF NET SETTLEMENT FUND\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 10 of 18\n\n\n\n\n 27. Additionally, for Electronic Claims submitted by brokers, nominees, and other\n\nfilers who submitted their data electronically, Simpluris reached out to confirm their submissions\n\nand notify the filer of any deficiencies. Simpluris provided these institutional Electronic Claim\n\nsubmitters whose submissions were deficient with a Transaction Report attached to the Deficiency\n\nNotice email which described and listed specific claimed accounts and/or transactions which were\n\nincomplete or deficient. The Transaction Reports were sent electronically to 18 filers who\n\nsubmitted 6,525 deficient or ineligible Electronic Claims; and,\n\n a. Identified individual transactions and entire Electronic Claims that were found to\n be deficient or ineligible so that the filer on behalf of the Claimant had the\n\n opportunity to correct the deficient condition or contest the determination of\n\n ineligibility;\n\n b. Stated that any deficient transactions or Electronic Claims that remain uncured, as\n\n well as any transactions or Electronic Claims that were identified as ineligible on\n\n the Transaction Report, would be rejected; and,\n\n c. Provided Simpluris\u2019s contact information so that the filer could reach out to\n\n Simpluris if it had any questions or required assistance.\n\n 28. The responses to the Transaction Reports were reviewed by Simpluris\u2019s Securities\n\nTeam, scanned and/or loaded into Simpluris\u2019s database, and were associated with the\n\ncorresponding Electronic Claim. If the response corrected the defect(s) or affected the Electronic\n\nClaim\u2019s status, Simpluris manually and/or programmatically updated the database to reflect the\n\nchange in status of the Electronic Claim. As a result of this process, 859 previously defective\n\nclaims have been cured and are now recommended as eligible for participation in the settlement.\n\n FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICES AND DISPUTED CLAIMS\n\n 29. After, or simultaneously with some, Deficiency Notices were transmitted and\n\ncorresponding response deadlines passed, Simpluris mailed and/or emailed Final Disposition\n\nNotices to all claimants. Final Disposition Notices contained calculated Recognized Loss amounts\n\n Page 10 of 18\n DECLARATION OF MEGAN TODD IN SUPPORT OF LEAD PLAINTIFFS\u2019 MOTION FOR\n APPROVAL OF DISTRIBUTION OF NET SETTLEMENT FUND\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 11 of 18\n\n\n\n\nand instructions for how to notify Simpluris within fourteen (14) days of the date of the notice if\n\nthe claimant believed Simpluris\u2019s calculated Recognized Loss amount was incorrect for any\n\nreason.\n\n 30. As a result of the Final Disposition Notice campaign, Simpluris received 69\n\nrequests for review of the calculated Recognized Loss amounts. Simpluris responded to all\n\nrequests for review, fully explained determinations, received and considered any additional\n\ninformation or explanations by the claimant, and attempted to facilitate the submission of missing\n\ninformation or documentation where applicable.\n 31. As a result of these efforts, as of January 30, 2026, 61 Proofs of Claims for which\n\nreview had been requested have been cured and re-calculated, using updated transaction\n\ninformation provided by the claimants, to a positive Recognized Loss amount and eight (8) remain\n\nrejected due no Recognized Loss amount after the re-calculation.\n\n LATE BUT OTHERWISE ELIGIBLE PROOFS OF CLAIM\n\n 32. Through January 30, 2026, Simpluris received 39 Proofs of Claim that were\n\npostmarked after the January 13, 2025, Proof of Claim submission deadline established by the\n\nCourt. Simpluris processed all late Proofs of Claim received through January 30, 2026, and 19\n\nhave been found to be otherwise eligible in whole or in part (the \u201cLate But Otherwise Eligible\n\nClaims\u201d). Simpluris has not rejected any Proof of Claim received through January 30, 2026 solely\n\nbased on its late submission, and Simpluris believes no delay has resulted from the provisional\n\nacceptance of these Late But Otherwise Eligible Claims. To the extent they are eligible but for the\n\nfact that they were late, they are recommended herein for payment.\n\n FINAL BAR DATE\n\n 33. There must be a final cut-off date after which no more Proofs of Claim will be\n\naccepted so that there may be a proportional distribution of the Net Settlement Fund and the\n\ndistribution may be accomplished. Acceptance of additional Proofs of Claim or responses to\n\nDeficiency Notices received during the finalization of the administration and the preparation of\n\n Page 11 of 18\n DECLARATION OF MEGAN TODD IN SUPPORT OF LEAD PLAINTIFFS\u2019 MOTION FOR\n APPROVAL OF DISTRIBUTION OF NET SETTLEMENT FUND\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 12 of 18\n\n\n\n\nthis application would necessarily require a delay in the distribution. Accordingly, it is also\n\nrespectfully requested that this Court order that no Proof of Claim received after January 30, 2026,\n\nbe eligible for payment for any reason whatsoever. Completing the processing of these Claims at\n\nthis time would delay the submission of this application.\n\n 34. Further, Simpluris recommends that no documentation to cure previously defective\n\nclaims, and no adjustments to previously filed Proofs of Claim which would result in an increased\n\nRecognized Loss, may be accepted after the Final Bar Date. However, should an adjustment be\n\nreceived that results in a lower Recognized Loss amount for an Eligible Claim, that adjustment\nwill be made and the Recognized Loss amount will be reduced accordingly, prior to a distribution\n\nto that Claimant.\n\n QUALITY ASSURANCE\n\n 35. An integral part of all Simpluris\u2019s settlement administration projects is its Quality\n\nAssurance review. Simpluris\u2019s personnel worked throughout the entire administration process to\n\nensure that Proofs of Claim were processed properly, that deficiency and ineligibility defects were\n\nproperly applied to Proofs of Claim, that deficiency notices were mailed to the appropriate\n\nClaimants, and that Simpluris\u2019s computer programs were operating properly.\n\n 36. In support of the work described above, Simpluris staff designed, implemented, and\n\ntested the following programs for this administration: (i) data entry screens that store Proof of\n\nClaim information (including all transactional data included on each Proof of Claim and in any\n\nsupporting documentation), assign defect codes and, where necessary, apply text to denote\n\ndeficiencies existing within the Proof of Claim; (ii) screens for the analyst to review images of the\n\nProof of Claim and any supporting documentation provided; (iii) programs to load and analyze\n\ntransactional data submitted electronically for all Electronic Claims (the load program converts\n\nthe data submitted into the format required by the calculation program, and the analysis program\n\ndetermines if the data is consistent and complete); (iv) a program to compare the claimed\n\ntransaction prices against the reported market prices to confirm that the claimed transactions were\n\n Page 12 of 18\n DECLARATION OF MEGAN TODD IN SUPPORT OF LEAD PLAINTIFFS\u2019 MOTION FOR\n APPROVAL OF DISTRIBUTION OF NET SETTLEMENT FUND\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 13 of 18\n\n\n\n\nwithin an acceptable range of the reported market prices; (v) a calculation program to analyze the\n\ntransactional data for all Proofs of Claim, and calculate the Recognized Losses based on the Plan\n\nof Allocation; and (vi) programs to generate various reports throughout and at the conclusion of\n\nthe administration, including lists of all eligible and ineligible Proofs of Claim.\n\n 37. Simpluris\u2019s Securities Team performed a final quality control check once all\n\naccepted Proofs of Claims were processed, Deficiency Notices were mailed or emailed, deficiency\n\nresponses were reviewed and processed, and Final Disposition Notices were mailed or emailed, to\n\nensure the correctness and completeness of all of the Proofs of Claim processed before Simpluris\nprepared its final reports to Plaintiffs\u2019 Counsel. Here, in connection with this Quality Assurance\n\nwrap-up, Simpluris: (i) confirmed that Proofs of Claims that are recommended for approval have\n\nno messages denoting ineligibility; (ii) confirmed that Proofs of Claims that are recommended for\n\nrejection have messages denoting ineligibility; (iii) confirmed that all Proofs of Claim requiring\n\nDeficiency Notices were sent such notices; (iv) performed a sample review of deficient Proofs of\n\nClaim; (v) reviewed a sampling of Proofs of Claim with high Recognized Loss amounts; (vi)\n\nsampled Proofs of Claim that had been determined to be ineligible, including those with no\n\nRecognized Loss calculated in accordance with the Plan of Allocation, in order to verify that all\n\ntransactions had been captured correctly; and (vii) retested the accuracy of the calculation program.\n\n FINAL DISPOSITIONS OF PROOFS OF CLAIM\n\n 38. Simpluris has completed the processing of the 24,159 Proofs of Claim that were\n\nreceived through January 30, 2026, and has determined that 5,868 are acceptable in whole or in\n\npart, and that 18,291 should be wholly rejected because they are either ineligible, wholly deficient,\n\nor have no Recognized Loss when calculated in accordance with the Court approved Plan of\n\nAllocation.\n\n 39. The 18,291 wholly rejected Proofs of Claim are recommended for rejection by the\n\nCourt for the following reasons:\n\n Summary of Rejected Proofs of Claims\n\n Page 13 of 18\n DECLARATION OF MEGAN TODD IN SUPPORT OF LEAD PLAINTIFFS\u2019 MOTION FOR\n APPROVAL OF DISTRIBUTION OF NET SETTLEMENT FUND\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 14 of 18\n\n\n\n\n Reason for Rejection Number of Proofs of Claim\n\n No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During 3,221\n the Class Period\n\n Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of 5\n Ineligibility Never Cured\n\n Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of\n Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized 168\n Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive\n Recognized Loss\n\n Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of\n Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized 4,639\n Loss is Incalculable\n\n No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not 10,251\n Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\n Proof of Claim Withdrawn/Voided 7\n\n\n TOTAL 18,291\n\n 40. A list of all Proofs of Claim submitted and Simpluris\u2019s recommendation as to their\n\ndisposition is contained in the Administrator\u2019s Report attached hereto as Exhibit B. Exhibit B-1,\n\nentitled \u201cTimely Eligible Claims,\u201d lists all timely filed, provisionally accepted, in whole or in part,\n\nProofs of Claim and states their Recognized Loss. Exhibit B-2, entitled \u201cLate But Otherwise\n\nEligible Claims,\u201d lists all late filed, provisionally accepted, in whole or in part, Proofs of Claim\n\nand states their Recognized Loss. Exhibit B-3, entitled \u201cRejected Claims,\u201d lists all wholly rejected\n\nProofs of Claim and states the reason for their rejection. For privacy reasons, Exhibit B provides\n\nonly the Claimant\u2019s Response ID and Recognized Loss or Reason for Rejection (no names,\n\naddresses, Taxpayer IDs, Social Security or Social Insurance Numbers are disclosed).\n\n 41. Simpluris has determined that 5,868 Proofs of Claim should be accepted. The\n\nProofs of Claim recommended for acceptance represent total Recognized Losses of\n\n$11,413,046.16 under the Court-approved Plan of Allocation. Of that total, 5,849 are for Timely\n\nEligible Claims, totaling $11,281,305.48 and 19 are for Late But Otherwise Eligible Claims,\n Page 14 of 18\n DECLARATION OF MEGAN TODD IN SUPPORT OF LEAD PLAINTIFFS\u2019 MOTION FOR\n APPROVAL OF DISTRIBUTION OF NET SETTLEMENT FUND\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 15 of 18\n\n\n\n\ntotaling $131,740.68. According to the Plan of Allocation, each Authorized Claimant shall be\n\nallocated a pro rata share of the Net Settlement Fund based on his, her, or its Recognized Loss in\n\ncomparison to the total Recognized Losses of all Authorized Claimants. Upon approval by the\n\nCourt, Simpluris will prepare and mail checks (or wire transfers where applicable) to Authorized\n\nClaimants for their payment amount subject to the provisions of the Court-approved distribution\n\nplan.\n\n DISTRIBUTION PLAN FOR THE NET SETTLEMENT FUND\n\n 42. Should the Court concur with Simpluris\u2019s recommendations and determinations\nconcerning the provisionally accepted and rejected Proofs of Claim, including the Late But\n\nOtherwise Eligible Claims, Simpluris recommends the following distribution plan (the\n\n\u201cDistribution Plan\u201d):\n\n a. Simpluris will conduct an immediate distribution (the \u201cInitial Distribution\u201d) of the\n\n Net Settlement Fund,2 after deducting the payments requested in this motion, and\n\n after payment of any estimated taxes, the costs of preparing appropriate tax returns,\n\n and any escrow fees, as follows:\n\n i. Simpluris will calculate award amounts to all Authorized Claimants as if\n\n the entire Net Settlement Fund were to be distributed now by calculating\n\n their pro rata share of the fund in accordance with the Plan of Allocation.\n\n ii. Simpluris will, pursuant to the terms of the Plan of Allocation, eliminate\n\n any Authorized Claimant whose award amount calculates to less than\n\n $10.00. Such Claimants will not receive any distribution from the Net\n\n Settlement Fund.\n\n\n\n2\n Simpluris understands that all procedures performed with respect to the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund in\nconnection with the validity of the Proofs of Claim submitted are subject to the supervision and direction of Plaintiffs\u2019\nCounsel and the Court. To carry out such orders as the Court may issue with respect to the allocation and distribution\nof the Net Settlement Fund to Authorized Claimants, Simpluris will first coordinate with Plaintiffs\u2019 Counsel to\ndetermine the amount remaining in the Net Settlement Fund after all fees and expenses authorized by this Court have\nbeen paid.\n Page 15 of 18\n DECLARATION OF MEGAN TODD IN SUPPORT OF LEAD PLAINTIFFS\u2019 MOTION FOR\n APPROVAL OF DISTRIBUTION OF NET SETTLEMENT FUND\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 16 of 18\n\n\n\n\n iii. After eliminating Claimants who would have received less than $10.00,\n\n Simpluris will calculate the pro rata distribution payments for Authorized\n\n Claimants who would have received $10.00 or more pursuant to the\n\n calculations described in subparagraph (a)(i) above (\u201cDistribution\n\n Amounts\u201d).\n\n iv. Simpluris will then prepare checks for the distribution and registers of such\n\n distributions, and send the payments by prepaid first class mail. Finally,\n\n Simpluris will be issued replacement payments for distributions upon\n request by payee, and will respond to inquiries about distribution amounts\n\n and Recognized Loss amounts calculations.3\n\n v. Authorized Claimants who do not negotiate their Initial Distribution checks\n\n within the time allotted or on the conditions set forth in footnote 4 will\n\n irrevocably forfeit all recovery from the Settlement. The funds allocated to\n\n all such stale-dated checks will be available to be re-distributed to other\n\n Authorized Claimants in a potential Second Distribution described below.\n\n Similarly, Authorized Claimants who do not negotiate subsequent\n\n distributions within the time allotted or on the conditions set forth in\n\n footnote 4 will irrevocably forfeit any further recovery from the Net\n\n Settlement Fund.\n3\n For Authorized Claimants whose checks are returned as undeliverable, Simpluris will endeavor to locate new\naddresses by running the undeliverable addresses through address lookup services. Where a new address is located,\nSimpluris will update the database accordingly and re-issue a distribution check to the Authorized Claimant at the new\naddress. In the event an Authorized Claimant loses or damages his, her or its check, or otherwise requires a new check,\nSimpluris will issue replacements. Distribution re-issues will be undertaken only upon written instructions from the\nAuthorized Claimant, provided that the Authorized Claimant returns the previous check where appropriate. For all\nchecks, Simpluris will void the initial payment prior to re-issuing a payment. In order not to delay further distributions\nto Authorized Claimants who have timely negotiated their checks, Authorized Claimants will be informed that, if they\ndo not cash their Initial Distribution checks within the 90 days from the mail date, or they do not cash check reissues\nwithin 90 days of the mailing of such reissued check, their check will lapse, their entitlement to recovery will be\nirrevocably forfeited and the funds will be re-allocated to other Authorized Claimants. Reissue requests for lost or\ndamaged checks will be granted after the void date on the checks, however, void dates on any reissues may be adjusted\nso that all such checks go stale before a potential Second Distribution and no further reissues of Initial Distribution\nchecks will be made. Requests for reissued checks in connection with a potential Second Distribution and any\nsubsequent distributions will be handled in the same manner.\n Page 16 of 18\n DECLARATION OF MEGAN TODD IN SUPPORT OF LEAD PLAINTIFFS\u2019 MOTION FOR\n APPROVAL OF DISTRIBUTION OF NET SETTLEMENT FUND\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 17 of 18\n\n\n\n\n b. After Simpluris has made reasonable and diligent efforts to have Authorized\n\n Claimants negotiate their Initial Distribution checks, but no earlier than six (6)\n\n months after the Initial Distribution, Simpluris will consult with Plaintiffs\u2019 Counsel\n\n to review and determine if a potential Second Distribution of any uncashed funds\n\n would be economically feasible.\n\n c. No new Proofs of Claim may be accepted after January 30, 2026, and no further\n\n adjustments to Proofs of Claim received on or before January 30, 2026, that would\n\n result in an increased Recognized Loss amount may be made for any reason.\n BROKERAGE REIMBURSEMENT REQUESTS\n\n 43. As of January 30, 2026, Simpluris has received five (5) invoices from brokerages\n\nseeking payment of reasonable expenses actually incurred in connection with the settlement,\n\nincluding reimbursement of postage expenses and the costs of ascertaining the names and\n\naddresses of beneficial owners. The total amount requested to be reimbursed from the Settlement\n\nFund by the brokerages is $28,499.03. In accordance with paragraph 12 of the Order Granting\n\nLead Plaintiffs\u2019 Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, filed on\n\nSeptember 24, 2024, Simpluris has reviewed the brokerages\u2019 invoices and calculated\n\nreimbursement amounts based on a maximum of $0.70 per unit expense, resulting in the revised\n\nrequested reimbursement from the Settlement Fund of $14,614.60 for out-of-pocket expenses\n\nincurred by brokerages in mailing Postcard Notices to beneficial owners. Details of the brokerage\n\ninvoices are contained in Exhibit C for review and consideration.\n\n FEES AND DISBURSEMENTS\n\n 44. Simpluris agreed to be the Claims Administrator in exchange for payment of its\n\nfees and out-of-pocket expenses. Plaintiffs\u2019 Counsel received regular reports of all of the work\n\nSimpluris performed with respect to provision of notice and administration of the Settlement, and\n\nauthorized the claims administration work performed herein. The cost of administration for this\n\nproject to date is $79,619.71, and Simpluris\u2019s estimate of fees and expenses to conduct the initial\n\n Page 17 of 18\n DECLARATION OF MEGAN TODD IN SUPPORT OF LEAD PLAINTIFFS\u2019 MOTION FOR\n APPROVAL OF DISTRIBUTION OF NET SETTLEMENT FUND\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 18 of 18\n\n\n\n\ndistribution is $11,246.90, for a total of $90,866.61 in fees and expenses payable to Simpluris.\n\nSimpluris has up to this point received payments in the amount of $0.00.\n\n RECORDS RETENTION AND DESTRUCTION\n\n 45. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, one (1) year after the Initial Distribution,\n\nSimpluris will destroy the paper copies of the Proofs of Claim and all supporting documentation,\n\nand three (3) years after the Initial Distribution it will destroy electronic copies of the same.\n\n CONCLUSION\n\n 46. Simpluris respectfully requests that the Court enter an Order approving its\nadministrative determinations, accepting and rejecting the Proofs of Claim submitted herein\n\nreceived on or before January 30, 2026, and approving the proposed Distribution Plan. Simpluris\n\nfurther respectfully submits that its fees and expenses should be approved for payment from the\n\nSettlement Fund.\n\n\n\n I declare under penalty of perjury that the above is true and correct and that this Declaration\n\nwas executed this 4th day of February, 2026, in Spring Hill, Florida.\n\n\n\n __________________________________\n MEGAN TODD\n\n\n\n\n Page 18 of 18\n DECLARATION OF MEGAN TODD IN SUPPORT OF LEAD PLAINTIFFS\u2019 MOTION FOR\n APPROVAL OF DISTRIBUTION OF NET SETTLEMENT FUND\n\f","ocr_status":1,"date_upload":"2026-07-03T04:29:51.205798-07:00","document_number":"111","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"039012465701","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/483906278/","id":483906278,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/64904094/111/1/wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc/","date_created":"2026-06-24T12:56:13.206426-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-03T04:30:18.894517-07:00","sha1":"bbf4b474f544b6b812b27e1deab3c9f84a3e9f34","page_count":7,"file_size":401979,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.111.1.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.111.1.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-1 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 1 of 7\n\n\n\n\n EXHIBIT A\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-1 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 2 of 7\n\n\n\n\n Example 1\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-1 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 3 of 7\n\n NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE CLAIM\n\n UNITED STATES OF AMERICA\n Before the\n UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO\n Wang, et al. v. Ampio Pharmaceuticals, et al.,\n Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-MEH\nAmpio Pharmaceuticals Securities Settlement\nSettlement Administrator 833-602-5027\nP.O. Box 25226 info@AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com\nSanta Ana, CA 92799 www.AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com\n\nClaimed Account Number: <>\nResponse ID: <>\n\nResponse Deadline: November 12, 2025\n\nDear <> <> <>:\n\nWe are writing to inform you of the status of the Proof of Claim and Release Form you submitted to the above-mentioned\naccount number in the Ampio Securities Settlement. Your response is currently deficient for the following reason(s):\n\n \u2022 Missing Signature\n\nTo resolve this defect, please read and sign the below Releases and Signature which were a part of your original Proof of\nClaim and Release Form but were never received as part of your submission. Once signed and completed, please scan or\ntake a photograph of the signed documentation and return as an attachment via email to\ninfo@AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com by November 12, 2025.\n\nIf you are unable to submit your response by email, please mail a physical copy to: Ampio Pharmaceuticals Securities\nSettlement, Settlement Administrator, P.O. Box 25226, Santa Ana, CA 92799. Defect responses submitted by mail must be\npostmarked by November 12, 2025, or if not sent by U.S. mail, then received by November 12, 2025.\n\nImportant Note: If we do not receive your remedy by the date indicated above, your response may be denied.\n\nShould you have any questions regarding this matter, you may call us at 833-602-5027 Monday-Friday 8am-5pm EST.\n\nSincerely,\n\nAmpio Pharmaceuticals Settlement\nSettlement Administrator\n\n RELEASES AND SIGNATURE\n\n 1. I (We) hereby acknowledge full and complete satisfaction of, and do hereby fully, finally, and forever settle, release,\n and discharge from the Released Claims each and all of the Releasees as provided in the Stipulation of Settlement.\n\n 2. \u201cReleased Claims\u201d means all Released Defendants\u2019 Claims and all Released Plaintiffs\u2019 Claims.\n\n 3. \u201cReleased Defendants\u2019 Claims\u201d means all claims and causes of action of every nature and description, whether\n known or Unknown Claims, whether arising under federal, state, local, common, statutory, administrative, or\n foreign law, or any other law, rule, or regulation, at law or in equity, whether fixed or contingent, whether foreseen\n\nNotice of Defective Claim \u2013 Missing Signature Page 1 of 3\n7817v03 << SIMID >>\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-1 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 4 of 7\n\n or unforeseen, whether accrued or unaccrued, whether liquidated or unliquidated, whether matured or unmatured,\n whether direct, representative, class, or individual in nature, that arise out of or relate in any way to the institution,\n prosecution, or settlement of the claims against Defendants, which Defendants will release as against Plaintiffs\u2019\n Releasees upon the Effective Date. Released Defendants\u2019 Claims shall not include: (1) any claims relating to the\n enforcement of the Settlement; or (2) any claims against any Person or entity who or which submits a request for\n exclusion from the Settlement Class that is accepted by the Court.\n\n 4. \u201cReleased Plaintiffs\u2019 Claims\u201d means all claims, rights, causes of action, duties, obligations, demands, actions, debts,\n sums of money, suits, contracts, agreements, promises, damages and liabilities, of every nature and description,\n whether known or Unknown Claims, whether arising under federal, state, local, common, statutory, administrative,\n or foreign law, or any other law, rule, or regulation, at law or in equity, whether fixed or contingent, whether\n foreseen or unforeseen, whether accrued or unaccrued, whether liquidated or unliquidated, whether matured or\n unmatured, whether indirect, representative, direct, class or individual in nature, whether suspected or unsuspected,\n whether foreign or domestic, that have been asserted, could have been asserted or could in the future be asserted\n against Defendants or any of the Defendants\u2019 Releasees that arise out of or relate in any way to (i) the allegations,\n transactions, acts, facts, events, matters, occurrences, representations or omissions involved, set forth, alleged or\n referred to in this Action, and (ii) the purchase, acquisition, sale or disposition of Ampio common stock during the\n Class Period. The following claims are explicitly excluded from release: (1) all claims related to the enforcement\n of the Settlement; and (2) any claims of any Person or entity who or which submits a request for exclusion from the\n Settlement that is accepted by the Court.\n\n 5. \u201cReleasee(s)\u201d means each and any of the Defendants\u2019 Releasees and each and any of the Plaintiffs\u2019 Releasees.\n\n 6. \u201cDefendants\u2019 Releasees\u201d means Defendants, and any and all of their related parties in any forum, including, without\n limitation, any and all of their current, former, or future parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, predecessors, successors,\n divisions, investment funds, joint ventures and general or limited partnerships, and each of their respective current\n or former officers, directors, trustees, partners, shareholders, owners, members, contractors, subcontractors,\n auditors, principals, agents, managing agents, employees, attorneys, accountants, advisors, investment bankers,\n underwriters, co-insurers, reinsurers, insurers or assigns, in their capacities as such, as well as each of the Individual\n Defendants\u2019 and Michael Macaluso\u2019s Immediate Family members, heirs, trusts, trustees, executors, administrators,\n personal or legal representatives, estates, beneficiaries, agents, attorneys, accountants, insurers, co-insurers,\n reinsurers, advisors, and assigns, in their capacities as such.\n\n 7. \u201cPlaintiffs\u2019 Releasees\u201d means (i) Lead Plaintiffs, their attorneys, and all other Settlement Class Members; (ii)\n affiliates, current and former parents, subsidiaries, successors, predecessors, assigns, executors, administrators,\n representatives, attorneys, and agents of each of the foregoing in (i); and (iii) the current and former officers,\n directors, Immediate Family members, heirs, trusts, trustees, executors, estates, administrators, beneficiaries,\n agents, affiliates, insurers, reinsurers, predecessors, successors, assigns, and advisors of each of the persons or\n entities listed in (i) and (ii), in their capacities as such.\n\n 8. \u201cUnknown Claims\u201d means any Released Plaintiffs\u2019 Claims which any Lead Plaintiff or any other Settlement Class\n Member does not know or suspect to exist in his, her, or its favor at the time of the release of such claims, and any\n Released Defendants\u2019 Claims that any Defendant does not know or suspect to exist in his, her, or its favor at the\n time of the release of such claims, which, if known by him, her, or it, might have materially affected his, her, or its\n decision(s) with respect to this Settlement. With respect to any and all Released Claims, the Parties stipulate and\n agree that, upon the Effective Date of the Settlement, Lead Plaintiffs and Defendants shall expressly waive, and\n each of the other Settlement Class Members shall be deemed to have waived, and by operation of the Judgment or\n the Alternate Judgment, if applicable, shall have expressly waived, any and all provisions, rights, and benefits\n conferred by any law of any state or territory of the United States, or principle of common law or foreign law, which\n is similar, comparable, or equivalent to California Civil Code \u00a71542, which provides:\n\n\n\n\nNotice of Defective Claim \u2013 Missing Signature Page 2 of 3\n7817v03 << SIMID >>\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-1 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 5 of 7\n\nA general release does not extend to claims that the creditor or releasing party does not know or suspect to exist in\nhis or her favor at the time of executing the release and that, if known by him or her, would have materially affected\nhis or her settlement with the debtor or released party.\n\nLead Plaintiffs, other Settlement Class Members, any of Plaintiffs\u2019 Releasees, Defendants, or any of Defendants\u2019 Releasees\nmay hereafter discover facts, legal theories, or authorities in addition to or different from those which any of them now\nknows or believes to be true with respect to the subject matter of the Released Claims, but Lead Plaintiffs and Defendants\nshall expressly, fully, finally, and forever waive, compromise, settle, discharge, extinguish, and release, and each Settlement\nClass Member shall be deemed to have waived, compromised, settled, discharged, extinguished, and released, and upon the\nEffective Date and by operation of the Judgment or Alternative Judgment shall have waived, compromised, settled,\ndischarged, extinguished, and released, fully, finally, and forever, any and all Released Claims, known or unknown,\nsuspected or unsuspected, contingent or absolute, accrued or unaccrued, apparent or unapparent, which now exist, or\nheretofore existed, or may hereafter exist, without regard to the subsequent discovery or existence of such different or\nadditional facts, legal theories, or authorities. Lead Plaintiffs and Defendants acknowledge, and each of the other Settlement\nClass Members shall be deemed by operation of law to have acknowledged, that the foregoing waiver was separately\nbargained for and a material element of the Settlement.\n\n 9. These releases shall be of no force or effect unless and until the Court approves the Stipulation and the Settlement\n becomes effective on the Effective Date.\n\n 10. I (We) hereby warrant and represent that I (we) have not assigned or transferred or purported to assign or transfer,\n voluntarily or involuntarily, any claim or matter released pursuant to this release or any other part or portion thereof.\n\n 11. I (We) hereby warrant and represent that I (we) have included all the information requested (including supporting\n documentation) about all of my (our) transactions and positions in Ampio common stock between December 28,\n 2020, and October 31, 2022, inclusive. I (we) agree to furnish additional information to the Claims Administrator\n to support this claim if requested to do so.\n\n 12. I (We) certify that I am (we are) NOT subject to backup withholding under the provisions of Section 3406 (a)(1)(c)\n of the Internal Revenue Code because: (a) I am (we are) exempt from backup withholding, or (b) I (we) have not\n been notified by the I.R.S. that I am (we are) subject to backup withholding as a result of a failure to report all\n interest or dividends, or (c) the I.R.S. has notified me (us) that I am (we are) no longer subject to backup withholding.\n\nNOTE: If you have been notified by the I.R.S. that you are subject to backup withholding, please strike out the language\nthat you are not subject to backup withholding in the certification above.\n\n\n\nI (WE) DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA\nTHAT ALL OF THE INFORMATION I (WE) PROVIDED ON THIS CLAIM FORM IS TRUE, CORRECT AND\nCOMPLETE.\nPrint Name of Claimant (Beneficial Owner)\n\n\nSignature of Claimant (Beneficial Owner)\n\n\n\n\nMM DD YY\n\n\n\n\nNotice of Defective Claim \u2013 Missing Signature Page 3 of 3\n7817v03 << SIMID >>\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-1 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 6 of 7\n\n\n\n\n Example 2\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-1 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 7 of 7\n\n NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE CLAIM\n\n UNITED STATES OF AMERICA\n Before the\n UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO\n Wang, et al. v. Ampio Pharmaceuticals, et al.,\n Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-MEH\nAmpio Pharmaceuticals Settlement\nSettlement Administrator 833-602-5027\nP.O. Box 25226 info@AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com\nSanta Ana, CA 92799 www.AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com\n\nClaimed Account Number: <>\nResponse ID: <>\n\nResponse Deadline: November 12, 2025\n\nDear <> <> <>:\n\nWe are writing to inform you of the status of the Proof of Claim and Release Form you submitted to the above-mentioned\naccount number in the Ampio Securities Settlement. Your response is currently deficient for the following reason(s):\n\n \u2022 Invalid/Insufficient/Missing Supporting Documents\n\n The documentation previously submitted is either missing or does not substantiate one or more transactions in your\n claim. Please submit supporting documentation that meets the following requirements for all claimed transactions:\n\n 1. The claimant\u2019s name\n 2. The account number\n 3. Date of transaction\n a. Note for Beginning and Ending holdings only \u2013 Date of Monthly statement is sufficient\n 4. Security Identifier (CUSIP or Transaction Code)\n 5. Quantity/Amount\n 6. Price/Cost per Share\n 7. Total Cost of the Transaction minus any fees\n\nTo resolve this defect, please scan or attach a photograph(s) of the requested supporting documentation and return via email\nto info@AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com by November 12, 2025.\n\nIf you are unable to submit your response by email, you may mail physical copies, along with a brief cover letter providing\nyour name and the corresponding Response ID to: Ampio Pharmaceuticals Securities Settlement, Settlement Administrator,\nP.O. Box 25226, Santa Ana, CA 92799. Defect responses submitted by mail must be postmarked by November 12, 2025,\nor if not sent by U.S. mail, then received by November 12, 2025.\n\nShould you have any questions or if you are unsure which transactions are unsupported and/or are in need of documentation,\nplease contact us within 10 days of receipt of this notice but no later than October 27, 2025 to request further details about\nyour submitted Proof of Claim and Release Form. You may call us at 833-602-5027 Monday-Friday 8am-5pm EST.\n\nSincerely,\n\nAmpio Pharmaceuticals Settlement\nSettlement Administrator\n\n\nNotice of Defective Claim \u2013 Invalid/Insufficient/Missing Supporting Documents Page 1 of 1\n7817v03 << SIMID >>\n\f","ocr_status":1,"date_upload":"2026-06-24T12:56:57.822806-07:00","document_number":"111","attachment_number":1,"pacer_doc_id":"039012465702","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":2,"description":"Exhibit A - Deficiency Notice Examples","acms_document_guid":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/483906280/","id":483906280,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/64904094/111/2/wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc/","date_created":"2026-06-24T12:56:13.232410-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-17T05:29:08.937106-07:00","sha1":"a82ae097668eecc7c076a0d87fc72ba57d497201","page_count":87,"file_size":253354,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.111.2.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.111.2.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 1 of 87\n\n\n\n\n EXHIBIT B\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 2 of 87\n\n\n\n\n EXHIBIT B-1\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 3 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7708784 $ 2,881.12\n 7761763 $ 27,966.08\n 7766833 $ 15.01\n 7778347 $ 41,017.53\n 7789949 $ 1,259.40\n 7818251 $ 57.60\n 7820416 $ 160.00\n 7846939 $ 3,200.00\n 7853631 $ 1,460.00\n 7853752 $ 5,120.00\n 7853792 $ 1,200.00\n 7853803 $ 18,200.00\n 7853823 $ 16,000.00\n 7853872 $ 7,950.00\n 7867380 $ 3,200.00\n 7880829 $ 218.00\n 7881010 $ 1,160.00\n 7882058 $ 111,811.84\n 7882126 $ 760.00\n 7882274 $ 2,240.00\n 7882554 $ 13.60\n 7882620 $ 640.00\n 7883046 $ 4.00\n 7883676 $ 36.00\n 7883921 $ 71.04\n 7883939 $ 1.12\n 7884070 $ 3.20\n 7884073 $ 3,150.00\n 7884116 $ 12.80\n 7884338 $ 40.00\n 7884578 $ 388.80\n 7884854 $ 105.40\n 7886047 $ 96.00\n 7886066 $ 72.00\n 7886180 $ 937.30\n 7886475 $ 8.96\n 7886619 $ 2,000.00\n 7886962 $ 28.00\n 7887185 $ 2,000.00\n 7887314 $ 1.92\n 7887380 $ 4,800.00\n 7887489 $ 0.16\n 7887695 $ 1,000.00\n 7888054 $ 320.00\n 7888089 $ 8.00\n 7888122 $ 1.60\n 7888135 $ 1,600.00\n 7888137 $ 480.00\n 7888300 $ 0.16\n 7888379 $ 80.00\n 7888737 $ 608.00\n 7888993 $ 20.04\n 7889193 $ 640.00\n 7889262 $ 320.00\n 7889286 $ 200.00\n 7889301 $ 1,120.00\n 7889377 $ 26.72\n 7892308 $ 4,800.00\n 7892391 $ 80.00\n 7892524 $ 252.03\n 7892550 $ 658.72\n 7892704 $ 18,672.00\n 7892709 $ 1,600.00\n 7892862 $ 640.00\n 7893249 $ 10.00\n 7893764 $ 2,195.20\n 7893833 $ 368.00\n 7893905 $ 1,400.00\n 7894200 $ 2,132.00\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 4 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7894350 $ 560.00\n 7894382 $ 2,400.00\n 7894408 $ 4,800.00\n 7895501 $ 878.32\n 7895653 $ 223.20\n 7896438 $ 14,800.00\n 7896578 $ 8.80\n 7897225 $ 400.00\n 7897403 $ 759.52\n 7897454 $ 226.56\n 7897600 $ 2,240.00\n 7897972 $ 102.40\n 7898028 $ 600.00\n 7898686 $ 1,094.00\n 7899421 $ 4,000.00\n 7900051 $ 230.40\n 7900169 $ 6,532.26\n 7900487 $ 112.00\n 7901806 $ 16.00\n 7901812 $ 26.40\n 7902717 $ 1,600.00\n 7902962 $ 3,200.00\n 7903688 $ 1,360.00\n 7903902 $ 3,678.40\n 7904592 $ 200.00\n 7906478 $ 18,399.36\n 7906785 $ 240.00\n 7907109 $ 3,660.00\n 7907214 $ 1,040.00\n 7907504 $ 3,216.00\n 7907554 $ 100.00\n 7908733 $ 1,504.00\n 7908749 $ 3,104.00\n 7908756 $ 108.00\n 7908866 $ 4,800.00\n 7908876 $ 1,600.00\n 7909396 $ 80.00\n 7909401 $ 40.00\n 7909430 $ 460.80\n 7909607 $ 264.96\n 7909893 $ 39.68\n 7909975 $ 3,206.40\n 7910154 $ 1.92\n 7910160 $ 0.32\n 7910320 $ 1,496.00\n 7910325 $ 448.00\n 7910328 $ 456.00\n 7910340 $ 36.62\n 7910420 $ 1,776.00\n 7910443 $ 16.00\n 7910467 $ 439.36\n 7910537 $ 8,755.00\n 7910585 $ 8,560.00\n 7910726 $ 6.40\n 7910894 $ 202.72\n 7910959 $ 96.00\n 7911119 $ 1.28\n 7911138 $ 10,480.00\n 7911298 $ 182.40\n 7911300 $ 353.60\n 7911319 $ 640.00\n 7911324 $ 44.80\n 7911332 $ 800.00\n 7911393 $ 47.84\n 7911396 $ 2,424.00\n 7911495 $ 224.00\n 7911498 $ 320.00\n 7911501 $ 480.00\n 7911526 $ 50.00\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 5 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7911535 $ 8,680.00\n 7911656 $ 1,600.00\n 7911696 $ 23,201.60\n 7911757 $ 1,868.00\n 7911769 $ 8,000.00\n 7911787 $ 8,800.00\n 7911941 $ 600.00\n 7912068 $ 1,658.00\n 7912091 $ 800.00\n 7912117 $ 51.52\n 7912162 $ 249,742.40\n 7912188 $ 421,942.70\n 7912194 $ 800.00\n 7912236 $ 16.00\n 7912237 $ 480.00\n 7912318 $ 35,200.00\n 7912682 $ 5,600.00\n 7912738 $ 6,400.00\n 7913013 $ 2,669.12\n 7913079 $ 560.00\n 7913457 $ 1,295.68\n 7913505 $ 1,850.52\n 7913551 $ 1,280.00\n 7913584 $ 3,827.84\n 7913585 $ 1,600.00\n 7913592 $ 1.12\n 7913653 $ 4,384.00\n 7913667 $ 96.00\n 7913677 $ 1,424.48\n 7913681 $ 9,408.00\n 7913697 $ 1,346.24\n 7913701 $ 15,216.00\n 7913706 $ 2,161.12\n 7913719 $ 15,504.00\n 7913737 $ 306.40\n 7913775 $ 352.00\n 7913808 $ 1,221.12\n 7913818 $ 10,240.00\n 7913832 $ 1,280.00\n 7913848 $ 2,256.00\n 7913866 $ 4,000.00\n 7913913 $ 640.00\n 7913924 $ 4,800.00\n 7913957 $ 176.00\n 7914078 $ 1.92\n 7914182 $ 72.00\n 7914236 $ 4.00\n 7914264 $ 1,360.00\n 7914267 $ 480.00\n 7914270 $ 1,360.00\n 7914274 $ 2,120.00\n 7914277 $ 1,780.00\n 7914281 $ 1,001.76\n 7914286 $ 7.20\n 7914307 $ 9,780.00\n 7914308 $ 41,004.00\n 7914330 $ 160.00\n 7914336 $ 4,224.00\n 7914340 $ 480.00\n 7914497 $ 1,080.00\n 7914511 $ 0.32\n 7914520 $ 320.00\n 7914527 $ 1,120.00\n 7914548 $ 240.00\n 7914770 $ 4,152.40\n 7914831 $ 363.09\n 7914924 $ 400.00\n 7914941 $ 0.32\n 7914998 $ 1,200.00\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 6 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7914999 $ 2,165.65\n 7915000 $ 320.00\n 7915011 $ 160.00\n 7915091 $ 2,960.00\n 7915095 $ 3,041.60\n 7915123 $ 16,253.60\n 7915126 $ 3,347.52\n 7915303 $ 3,799.20\n 7915310 $ 1,104.00\n 7915319 $ 1,885.44\n 7915364 $ 2,100.00\n 7915381 $ 7,200.00\n 7915467 $ 1,807.60\n 7915472 $ 192.00\n 7915494 $ 0.16\n 7915537 $ 1,648.00\n 7915683 $ 252.00\n 7915986 $ 152.00\n 7915987 $ 478.00\n 7916006 $ 4,800.00\n 7916011 $ 1,600.00\n 7916036 $ 3,200.00\n 7916380 $ 0.27\n 7916386 $ 160.00\n 7916390 $ 5,000.00\n 7916610 $ 11,904.66\n 7917284 $ 160.00\n 7917309 $ 20.00\n 7917324 $ 20.00\n 7919251 $ 74.40\n 7925943 $ 80.00\n 7937178 $ 5,760.00\n 7938274 $ 2.56\n 7979150 $ 16.00\n 7979153 $ 2.24\n 7979160 $ 11.52\n 7979162 $ 14.72\n 7979163 $ 8.64\n 7979167 $ 5.12\n 7979168 $ 3.20\n 7979175 $ 16.80\n 7979181 $ 0.16\n 7979183 $ 32.00\n 7979193 $ 0.16\n 7979196 $ 0.96\n 7979199 $ 43.20\n 7979200 $ 8.00\n 7979207 $ 0.80\n 7979215 $ 32.00\n 7979223 $ 3.20\n 7979225 $ 23.52\n 7979227 $ 81.60\n 7979231 $ 14.00\n 7979233 $ 54.52\n 7979240 $ 400.00\n 7979244 $ 9.60\n 7979248 $ 20.00\n 7979251 $ 32.00\n 7979255 $ 2.88\n 7979261 $ 200.40\n 7979263 $ 14.86\n 7979272 $ 8.64\n 7979274 $ 16.00\n 7979275 $ 624.00\n 7979279 $ 80.00\n 7979282 $ 80.00\n 7979285 $ 1.44\n 7979293 $ 3.20\n 7979301 $ 305.44\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 7 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7979303 $ 8.00\n 7979306 $ 1.60\n 7979308 $ 10.40\n 7979312 $ 5.76\n 7979313 $ 8.00\n 7979315 $ 16.00\n 7979320 $ 50.88\n 7979341 $ 8.48\n 7979343 $ 0.96\n 7979345 $ 16.00\n 7979346 $ 2.88\n 7979349 $ 66.06\n 7979352 $ 8,640.16\n 7979355 $ 20.64\n 7979376 $ 1.12\n 7979377 $ 45.44\n 7979380 $ 9.44\n 7979382 $ 0.80\n 7979392 $ 92.64\n 7979396 $ 32.00\n 7979404 $ 0.16\n 7979405 $ 1.60\n 7979414 $ 4.00\n 7979418 $ 0.32\n 7979419 $ 88.00\n 7979423 $ 16.00\n 7979424 $ 5.44\n 7979426 $ 0.48\n 7979444 $ 0.16\n 7979448 $ 0.80\n 7979452 $ 0.32\n 7979454 $ 0.32\n 7979456 $ 16.00\n 7979462 $ 0.16\n 7979467 $ 0.16\n 7979511 $ 1.60\n 7979538 $ 1.60\n 7979544 $ 80.00\n 7979549 $ 12.96\n 7979552 $ 40.00\n 7979555 $ 1.60\n 7979563 $ 0.32\n 7979593 $ 197.28\n 7979602 $ 0.16\n 7979605 $ 20.00\n 7979607 $ 10.00\n 7979614 $ 52.48\n 7979618 $ 3.52\n 7979626 $ 120.00\n 7979635 $ 31.52\n 7979638 $ 1.00\n 7979645 $ 112.00\n 7979646 $ 876.16\n 7979650 $ 62.72\n 7979678 $ 3.20\n 7979680 $ 80.00\n 7979686 $ 176.16\n 7979693 $ 53.81\n 7979700 $ 80.00\n 7979704 $ 4.64\n 7979737 $ 49.44\n 7979746 $ 0.96\n 7979752 $ 18.08\n 7979758 $ 3.20\n 7979763 $ 24.00\n 7979766 $ 0.16\n 7979775 $ 0.32\n 7979779 $ 0.16\n 7979792 $ 0.32\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 8 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7979815 $ 6.40\n 7979824 $ 1.60\n 7979825 $ 2.24\n 7979841 $ 5,908.00\n 7979850 $ 32.00\n 7979851 $ 44.00\n 7979858 $ 0.64\n 7979859 $ 12.96\n 7979892 $ 226.40\n 7979901 $ 131.67\n 7979909 $ 1.76\n 7979959 $ 3.20\n 7979967 $ 160.00\n 7979971 $ 159.84\n 7979994 $ 12.32\n 7980009 $ 1.60\n 7980027 $ 7.36\n 7980028 $ 20.00\n 7980030 $ 44.40\n 7980032 $ 59.36\n 7980035 $ 17.92\n 7980054 $ 0.16\n 7980058 $ 0.80\n 7980078 $ 3.04\n 7980081 $ 8.64\n 7980086 $ 3.36\n 7980087 $ 93.44\n 7980095 $ 20.96\n 7980097 $ 1.76\n 7980112 $ 15.68\n 7980118 $ 2.56\n 7980127 $ 1.12\n 7980128 $ 0.16\n 7980132 $ 8.00\n 7980135 $ 3.20\n 7980137 $ 32.00\n 7980138 $ 7.36\n 7980143 $ 0.32\n 7980145 $ 0.64\n 7980156 $ 8.48\n 7980157 $ 48.64\n 7980158 $ 960.00\n 7980163 $ 698.99\n 7980171 $ 0.48\n 7980173 $ 0.16\n 7980177 $ 33.30\n 7980185 $ 25.44\n 7980198 $ 160.00\n 7980204 $ 328.00\n 7980205 $ 1.92\n 7980209 $ 62.38\n 7980210 $ 2.72\n 7980214 $ 1.60\n 7980225 $ 50.08\n 7980232 $ 40.00\n 7980236 $ 7.36\n 7980240 $ 101.76\n 7980247 $ 6.00\n 7980249 $ 2,108.45\n 7980250 $ 0.80\n 7980267 $ 0.16\n 7980280 $ 5.76\n 7980281 $ 9.00\n 7980284 $ 32.00\n 7980286 $ 2.56\n 7980287 $ 0.32\n 7980288 $ 3.52\n 7980300 $ 5.76\n 7980307 $ 15.68\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 9 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7980310 $ 1.00\n 7980315 $ 11.20\n 7980319 $ 0.80\n 7980332 $ 6.40\n 7980333 $ 16.00\n 7980336 $ 80.00\n 7980338 $ 16.00\n 7980339 $ 64.00\n 7980342 $ 0.16\n 7980345 $ 171.76\n 7980351 $ 5.60\n 7980362 $ 3.20\n 7980363 $ 4.96\n 7980393 $ 0.10\n 7980396 $ 6.88\n 7980399 $ 1.60\n 7980404 $ 3.20\n 7980421 $ 0.48\n 7980430 $ 10.40\n 7980433 $ 132.80\n 7980437 $ 150.00\n 7980438 $ 60.00\n 7980440 $ 16.00\n 7980442 $ 48.00\n 7980445 $ 0.48\n 7980447 $ 0.80\n 7980449 $ 3.20\n 7980459 $ 1.28\n 7980461 $ 0.16\n 7980462 $ 42.97\n 7980465 $ 0.32\n 7980467 $ 2.40\n 7980468 $ 4.64\n 7980469 $ 126.24\n 7980472 $ 16.00\n 7980474 $ 6.08\n 7980475 $ 3,200.00\n 7980477 $ 1.02\n 7980483 $ 782.75\n 7980486 $ 6,400.00\n 7980490 $ 46.66\n 7980502 $ 15.68\n 7980504 $ 21.76\n 7980505 $ 2.06\n 7980508 $ 120.00\n 7980509 $ 24.00\n 7980510 $ 8.80\n 7980524 $ 8.00\n 7980525 $ 213.44\n 7980527 $ 16.00\n 7980547 $ 117.00\n 7980548 $ 28.16\n 7980551 $ 1,348.80\n 7980552 $ 72.80\n 7980553 $ 0.80\n 7980560 $ 7.84\n 7980564 $ 160.00\n 7980565 $ 127.52\n 7980570 $ 0.16\n 7980572 $ 67.36\n 7980575 $ 32.00\n 7980578 $ 4.48\n 7980579 $ 32.00\n 7980580 $ 80.00\n 7980581 $ 1.92\n 7980583 $ 85.60\n 7980585 $ 151.20\n 7980592 $ 2.40\n 7980606 $ 245.12\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 10 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7980610 $ 56.00\n 7980611 $ 876.16\n 7980621 $ 24.00\n 7980622 $ 17.44\n 7980623 $ 40.00\n 7980630 $ 5.44\n 7980631 $ 32.00\n 7980633 $ 0.16\n 7980635 $ 95.20\n 7980644 $ 0.16\n 7980645 $ 32.00\n 7980651 $ 56.00\n 7980654 $ 8.00\n 7980655 $ 10.00\n 7980659 $ 34.40\n 7980661 $ 2.40\n 7980663 $ 1.76\n 7980664 $ 23.20\n 7980665 $ 16.00\n 7980667 $ 14.56\n 7980668 $ 0.64\n 7980671 $ 16.00\n 7980672 $ 80.00\n 7980675 $ 38.40\n 7980676 $ 128.64\n 7980677 $ 16.00\n 7980678 $ 16.00\n 7980683 $ 1.60\n 7980689 $ 87.84\n 7980690 $ 16.00\n 7980694 $ 5.60\n 7980695 $ 0.16\n 7980698 $ 1,596.00\n 7980703 $ 80.00\n 7980709 $ 6.40\n 7980715 $ 176.00\n 7980718 $ 626.00\n 7980720 $ 3,028.80\n 7980722 $ 3.00\n 7980723 $ 32.00\n 7980728 $ 8.00\n 7980729 $ 1,795.04\n 7980731 $ 5.44\n 7980732 $ 43.52\n 7980734 $ 128.00\n 7980735 $ 0.08\n 7980736 $ 18.08\n 7980745 $ 22.88\n 7980747 $ 2.40\n 7980752 $ 16.00\n 7980757 $ 160.00\n 7980762 $ 0.64\n 7980764 $ 254.40\n 7980765 $ 2.08\n 7980766 $ 80.00\n 7980769 $ 4.00\n 7980771 $ 1.60\n 7980774 $ 160.00\n 7980777 $ 4.80\n 7980779 $ 1.60\n 7980782 $ 311.04\n 7980786 $ 6.40\n 7980788 $ 46.72\n 7980790 $ 48.00\n 7980793 $ 311.04\n 7980795 $ 600.00\n 7980799 $ 3,389.92\n 7980800 $ 6,620.16\n 7980801 $ 4,617.28\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 11 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7980802 $ 15,839.20\n 7980803 $ 53,707.52\n 7980804 $ 5,590.40\n 7980805 $ 25,968.70\n 7980806 $ 432.00\n 7980808 $ 9,066.08\n 7980809 $ 5.76\n 7980812 $ 34,162.08\n 7980813 $ 32.00\n 7980818 $ 348.00\n 7980819 $ 19,930.43\n 7980820 $ 76,251.54\n 7980821 $ 19,649.60\n 7980825 $ 7,508.32\n 7980826 $ 163.04\n 7980827 $ 5,608.11\n 7980829 $ 284,581.00\n 7980830 $ 61,906.00\n 7980831 $ 23,248.00\n 7980832 $ 292,199.58\n 7980834 $ 442,251.60\n 7980836 $ 1,785.60\n 7980837 $ 243.04\n 7980838 $ 206.00\n 7980839 $ 17,115.04\n 7980840 $ 10,712.96\n 7980847 $ 16,817.28\n 7980857 $ 52,253.46\n 7980858 $ 832.00\n 7980878 $ 1,518.10\n 7980879 $ 1,244.80\n 7980883 $ 35,178.30\n 7980884 $ 70,114.62\n 7980887 $ 3,499.20\n 7980902 $ 6,458.08\n 7980903 $ 12,415.38\n 7980905 $ 440.48\n 7980906 $ 5,183.96\n 7980907 $ 1,876.80\n 7980908 $ 24,542.26\n 7980911 $ 282.40\n 7980912 $ 792.32\n 7980913 $ 47.52\n 7980914 $ 2,687.34\n 7980915 $ 2,373.96\n 7980918 $ 132.15\n 7980920 $ 9.28\n 7980922 $ 367.85\n 7980925 $ 5,321.02\n 7980926 $ 2.24\n 7980927 $ 47.36\n 7980933 $ 0.54\n 7980935 $ 164.48\n 7980937 $ 423.34\n 7980940 $ 64.80\n 7980941 $ 40,957.55\n 7980942 $ 137.60\n 7980943 $ 18.88\n 7980944 $ 104.48\n 7980947 $ 4,965.96\n 7980948 $ 5.12\n 7980954 $ 4,003.36\n 7980956 $ 449.88\n 7980957 $ 1,320.58\n 7980961 $ 117.12\n 7980963 $ 3,706.40\n 7980964 $ 336.16\n 7980965 $ 440.64\n 7980967 $ 2,271.20\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 12 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7980968 $ 661.76\n 7980969 $ 321.44\n 7980970 $ 1,945.44\n 7980971 $ 276.96\n 7980974 $ 4,342.56\n 7980975 $ 64.16\n 7980976 $ 44.48\n 7980977 $ 8.96\n 7980979 $ 19,566.93\n 7980980 $ 66.72\n 7980983 $ 211.14\n 7980984 $ 321.80\n 7980985 $ 8,096.65\n 7980986 $ 1,869.16\n 7980987 $ 69.04\n 7980988 $ 1,437.44\n 7980990 $ 26.46\n 7980991 $ 1.32\n 7980993 $ 7.84\n 7980995 $ 8.34\n 7980999 $ 13,818.97\n 7981000 $ 5,243.28\n 7981001 $ 0.48\n 7981002 $ 17,072.00\n 7981003 $ 32.80\n 7981006 $ 4,175.36\n 7981007 $ 2,559.82\n 7981008 $ 79.52\n 7981009 $ 15,838.30\n 7981010 $ 5,549.01\n 7981012 $ 608.00\n 7981014 $ 637.56\n 7981015 $ 1,345.28\n 7981016 $ 2,798.24\n 7981018 $ 288.00\n 7981019 $ 1.36\n 7981020 $ 16.00\n 7981022 $ 132.90\n 7981023 $ 1,080.34\n 7981024 $ 9,929.55\n 7981026 $ 1,250.96\n 7981028 $ 6,926.18\n 7981031 $ 177.76\n 7981032 $ 275.20\n 7981033 $ 9,963.38\n 7981034 $ 107.04\n 7981035 $ 147.10\n 7981036 $ 815.98\n 7981037 $ 55.20\n 7981040 $ 4,616.00\n 7981041 $ 30,885.12\n 7981042 $ 7,577.64\n 7981043 $ 129,432.00\n 7981044 $ 2,321.20\n 7981045 $ 803.36\n 7981046 $ 329.28\n 7981047 $ 6,772.48\n 7981048 $ 8,324.80\n 7981049 $ 5,016.20\n 7981050 $ 494.20\n 7981051 $ 28.80\n 7981052 $ 1,363.62\n 7981053 $ 28,850.56\n 7981054 $ 525.54\n 7981055 $ 1,873.92\n 7981056 $ 4,071.52\n 7981057 $ 15.76\n 7981058 $ 53.45\n 7981059 $ 173.47\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 13 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7981060 $ 5,130.24\n 7981061 $ 430.40\n 7981063 $ 123,213.97\n 7981065 $ 352.96\n 7981066 $ 2,730.56\n 7981067 $ 1,711.87\n 7981069 $ 90.72\n 7981070 $ 31,676.48\n 7981071 $ 1,021.92\n 7981074 $ 52.52\n 7981075 $ 872.12\n 7981076 $ 432.96\n 7981077 $ 3,295.84\n 7981078 $ 39.52\n 7981083 $ 3,963.68\n 7981085 $ 1,408.00\n 7981086 $ 752.00\n 7981087 $ 3,472.00\n 7981089 $ 94.08\n 7981090 $ 547.83\n 7981091 $ 4,511.36\n 7981092 $ 4,000.00\n 7981094 $ 8,060.00\n 7981095 $ 1,917.00\n 7981096 $ 8,760.00\n 7981097 $ 4,490.80\n 7981098 $ 71,807.10\n 7981099 $ 887.80\n 7981100 $ 4,280.90\n 7981101 $ 3,580.00\n 7981102 $ 2,650.00\n 7981103 $ 3,088.00\n 7981104 $ 1,240.10\n 7981105 $ 3,840.00\n 7981106 $ 114,860.00\n 7981107 $ 630.00\n 7981108 $ 451.40\n 7981109 $ 1,399.10\n 7981110 $ 255.10\n 7981111 $ 4,210.00\n 7981112 $ 1,178.60\n 7981113 $ 962.80\n 7981114 $ 12,703.76\n 7981115 $ 1,070.00\n 7981118 $ 3,158.40\n 7981119 $ 545.50\n 7981120 $ 14,373.80\n 7981121 $ 29,780.50\n 7981122 $ 335.20\n 7981123 $ 240.00\n 7981124 $ 1,200.00\n 7981125 $ 163.20\n 7981126 $ 2,788.70\n 7981127 $ 1,166.70\n 7981128 $ 2,899.60\n 7981129 $ 746.00\n 7981132 $ 11,047.70\n 7981133 $ 1,162.30\n 7981134 $ 5,419.30\n 7981135 $ 2,278.58\n 7981136 $ 347.28\n 7981137 $ 16.00\n 7981138 $ 874.00\n 7981139 $ 295.00\n 7981140 $ 31.02\n 7981142 $ 17,916.48\n 7981143 $ 148.00\n 7981144 $ 88,762.29\n 7981145 $ 2,396.54\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 14 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7981146 $ 546.00\n 7981148 $ 915.29\n 7981150 $ 158.20\n 7981152 $ 560.00\n 7981155 $ 124.80\n 7981156 $ 47.66\n 7981157 $ 13.60\n 7981158 $ 101.76\n 7981159 $ 139.54\n 7981160 $ 4.74\n 7981161 $ 3,628.40\n 7981162 $ 40,448.00\n 7981163 $ 40,448.00\n 7981164 $ 6,343.60\n 7981166 $ 10,426.06\n 7981167 $ 36,450.00\n 7981168 $ 127.00\n 7981169 $ 1,802.30\n 7981170 $ 2,537.10\n 7981171 $ 106.72\n 7981232 $ 54,510.40\n 7981233 $ 3,932.00\n 7981234 $ 3,233.44\n 7981235 $ 1,844.91\n 7981238 $ 2,928.00\n 7981239 $ 8,653.20\n 7981240 $ 247.36\n 7981241 $ 195,050.99\n 7981242 $ 3,987.68\n 7981243 $ 24,899.52\n 7981244 $ 903.84\n 7981245 $ 56.00\n 7981246 $ 688.00\n 7981247 $ 3,417.60\n 7981250 $ 2,773.90\n 7981253 $ 2,464.40\n 7981254 $ 1,017.06\n 7981255 $ 63.46\n 7981256 $ 385.78\n 7981257 $ 556.80\n 7981258 $ 112.82\n 7981262 $ 272.00\n 7981263 $ 53.27\n 7981270 $ 1,108.64\n 7981271 $ 11,991.08\n 7981274 $ 304.00\n 7981275 $ 28,399.68\n 7981276 $ 693.04\n 7981281 $ 115.45\n 7981283 $ 480.00\n 7981284 $ 7.36\n 7981285 $ 7.36\n 7981286 $ 855.84\n 7981287 $ 96.00\n 7981288 $ 2.08\n 7981289 $ 17.84\n 7981290 $ 18.33\n 7981323 $ 3.20\n 7981329 $ 0.32\n 7981336 $ 1.60\n 7981340 $ 12.00\n 7981347 $ 6.00\n 7981348 $ 48.00\n 7981350 $ 0.48\n 7981352 $ 17.28\n 7981361 $ 4.62\n 7981363 $ 0.64\n 7981365 $ 8.00\n 7981366 $ 16.00\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 15 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7981376 $ 0.16\n 7981386 $ 5.60\n 7981391 $ 0.16\n 7981393 $ 220.00\n 7981407 $ 0.48\n 7981409 $ 0.32\n 7981421 $ 56.00\n 7981427 $ 48.00\n 7981430 $ 2.08\n 7981436 $ 4.80\n 7981438 $ 361.60\n 7981440 $ 0.80\n 7981442 $ 134.08\n 7981443 $ 3.04\n 7981444 $ 3.20\n 7981445 $ 17.60\n 7981446 $ 12.00\n 7981454 $ 22.00\n 7981457 $ 4.00\n 7981460 $ 16.48\n 7981463 $ 0.16\n 7981467 $ 8.02\n 7981468 $ 34.09\n 7981470 $ 0.48\n 7981481 $ 94.74\n 7981482 $ 19.20\n 7981483 $ 12.00\n 7981495 $ 8.00\n 7981497 $ 16.00\n 7981500 $ 11.60\n 7981501 $ 9.28\n 7981503 $ 1.28\n 7981507 $ 3.20\n 7981515 $ 0.96\n 7981521 $ 216.00\n 7981522 $ 96.00\n 7981526 $ 18.40\n 7981536 $ 32.00\n 7981540 $ 1.76\n 7981555 $ 73.60\n 7981563 $ 0.32\n 7981574 $ 0.48\n 7981580 $ 4.32\n 7981588 $ 4.32\n 7981594 $ 3.20\n 7981599 $ 56.78\n 7981601 $ 1.60\n 7981605 $ 1.76\n 7981612 $ 1.60\n 7981617 $ 98.80\n 7981619 $ 4.80\n 7981621 $ 35.36\n 7981623 $ 272.00\n 7981625 $ 4.00\n 7981631 $ 28.48\n 7981632 $ 4.00\n 7981638 $ 32.00\n 7981664 $ 80.00\n 7981668 $ 36.00\n 7981695 $ 0.80\n 7981698 $ 60.00\n 7981707 $ 16.96\n 7981711 $ 2.84\n 7981715 $ 5.12\n 7981725 $ 0.32\n 7981732 $ 1.60\n 7981746 $ 9.12\n 7981757 $ 12.00\n 7981760 $ 13.40\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 16 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7981775 $ 137.92\n 7981782 $ 8.00\n 7981790 $ 916.00\n 7981807 $ 0.96\n 7981815 $ 2,400.00\n 7981826 $ 16.00\n 7981855 $ 8.00\n 7981858 $ 970.08\n 7981864 $ 392.50\n 7981866 $ 0.32\n 7981892 $ 0.16\n 7981899 $ 4.48\n 7981902 $ 0.80\n 7981905 $ 250.00\n 7981911 $ 0.80\n 7981920 $ 72.00\n 7981921 $ 2,400.16\n 7981937 $ 10.88\n 7981946 $ 0.48\n 7981948 $ 45.00\n 7981958 $ 16.00\n 7981963 $ 91.90\n 7981993 $ 0.96\n 7981995 $ 1.44\n 7982003 $ 144.00\n 7982022 $ 4.80\n 7982031 $ 129.12\n 7982045 $ 34.00\n 7982061 $ 104.00\n 7982066 $ 16.00\n 7982072 $ 1.60\n 7982081 $ 42.00\n 7982084 $ 16.00\n 7982085 $ 16.00\n 7982103 $ 8.00\n 7982116 $ 32.00\n 7982117 $ 3.20\n 7982127 $ 4.40\n 7982140 $ 20.00\n 7982182 $ 106.24\n 7982191 $ 400.00\n 7982198 $ 230.40\n 7982199 $ 20.22\n 7982206 $ 4.48\n 7982212 $ 24.00\n 7982215 $ 16.80\n 7982220 $ 17.60\n 7982222 $ 6.40\n 7982238 $ 320.00\n 7982242 $ 13.44\n 7982257 $ 72.00\n 7982269 $ 80.00\n 7982286 $ 10.64\n 7982293 $ 0.32\n 7982296 $ 0.16\n 7982300 $ 0.48\n 7982304 $ 80.00\n 7982318 $ 1.60\n 7982323 $ 3.20\n 7982331 $ 0.80\n 7982339 $ 3.20\n 7982340 $ 32.00\n 7982343 $ 19.04\n 7982350 $ 0.16\n 7982355 $ 132.16\n 7982361 $ 8.00\n 7982380 $ 125.60\n 7982388 $ 16.00\n 7982389 $ 1.44\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 17 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7982391 $ 6.00\n 7982393 $ 1.60\n 7982394 $ 92.80\n 7982395 $ 22.24\n 7982396 $ 3.68\n 7982399 $ 1.60\n 7982401 $ 40.00\n 7982402 $ 1.60\n 7982404 $ 2.88\n 7982418 $ 1.12\n 7982425 $ 4.80\n 7982428 $ 165.72\n 7982430 $ 1,540.00\n 7982432 $ 16.00\n 7982437 $ 1.60\n 7982444 $ 0.32\n 7982447 $ 16.00\n 7982453 $ 32.00\n 7982455 $ 320.00\n 7982458 $ 0.32\n 7982461 $ 42.00\n 7982463 $ 21.92\n 7982467 $ 46.56\n 7982469 $ 159.36\n 7982478 $ 2.40\n 7982485 $ 110.40\n 7982496 $ 2.40\n 7982500 $ 8.00\n 7982501 $ 17.60\n 7982511 $ 0.32\n 7982514 $ 3.20\n 7982517 $ 0.32\n 7982520 $ 7.20\n 7982521 $ 1.92\n 7982528 $ 2.08\n 7982536 $ 14.88\n 7982538 $ 0.96\n 7982543 $ 800.16\n 7982560 $ 15.92\n 7982563 $ 16.48\n 7982564 $ 1,874.80\n 7982567 $ 2.40\n 7982578 $ 1.92\n 7982580 $ 0.48\n 7982582 $ 1.92\n 7982592 $ 2.08\n 7982596 $ 1.60\n 7982614 $ 2.72\n 7982627 $ 128.00\n 7982628 $ 0.16\n 7982630 $ 40.00\n 7982632 $ 32.00\n 7982635 $ 48.00\n 7982651 $ 2,254.08\n 7982656 $ 38.08\n 7982657 $ 0.32\n 7982658 $ 120.00\n 7982659 $ 9.76\n 7982661 $ 3.20\n 7982664 $ 400.00\n 7982667 $ 161.36\n 7982669 $ 0.48\n 7982673 $ 1.76\n 7982678 $ 2.24\n 7982684 $ 516.00\n 7982686 $ 26.72\n 7982689 $ 9.60\n 7982693 $ 128.00\n 7982696 $ 1,412.00\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 18 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7982700 $ 65.60\n 7982710 $ 40.00\n 7982712 $ 1.28\n 7982721 $ 16.00\n 7982731 $ 1.88\n 7982754 $ 3.20\n 7982756 $ 16.00\n 7982757 $ 160.00\n 7982758 $ 80.00\n 7982762 $ 0.10\n 7982766 $ 65.44\n 7982768 $ 160.00\n 7982776 $ 405.28\n 7982779 $ 950.00\n 7982780 $ 8.00\n 7982783 $ 1.66\n 7982790 $ 150.00\n 7982792 $ 2.40\n 7982794 $ 100.00\n 7982796 $ 0.64\n 7982797 $ 137.28\n 7982802 $ 8.00\n 7982806 $ 2.40\n 7982809 $ 13.92\n 7982812 $ 68.70\n 7982817 $ 100.00\n 7982818 $ 0.48\n 7982824 $ 800.00\n 7982825 $ 160.00\n 7982827 $ 16.00\n 7982829 $ 4.00\n 7982834 $ 128.00\n 7982843 $ 360.00\n 7982849 $ 304.00\n 7982851 $ 0.15\n 7982854 $ 215.00\n 7982858 $ 32.80\n 7982859 $ 6,400.00\n 7982860 $ 0.48\n 7982861 $ 99.20\n 7982864 $ 1.60\n 7982867 $ 0.64\n 7982873 $ 459.84\n 7982874 $ 16.00\n 7982876 $ 200.00\n 7982879 $ 64.64\n 7982882 $ 24.00\n 7982885 $ 1.60\n 7982891 $ 390.00\n 7982892 $ 180.00\n 7982900 $ 1.44\n 7982909 $ 80.00\n 7982912 $ 32.00\n 7982913 $ 16.00\n 7982915 $ 144.00\n 7982917 $ 64.00\n 7982918 $ 8.00\n 7982920 $ 9.76\n 7982923 $ 85.28\n 7982930 $ 1.50\n 7982931 $ 3.20\n 7982933 $ 208.32\n 7982935 $ 24.00\n 7982940 $ 10.24\n 7982941 $ 2.50\n 7982946 $ 3.20\n 7982950 $ 880.00\n 7982952 $ 40.00\n 7982955 $ 0.64\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 19 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7982963 $ 22.40\n 7982964 $ 3.20\n 7982967 $ 142.20\n 7982970 $ 9.92\n 7982972 $ 9.60\n 7982984 $ 320.00\n 7982985 $ 5,294.00\n 7982989 $ 11,011.28\n 7982991 $ 8,288.30\n 7982992 $ 16.00\n 7982994 $ 300.00\n 7982995 $ 0.16\n 7982998 $ 450.00\n 7982999 $ 4,625.00\n 7983000 $ 30.00\n 7983002 $ 594.90\n 7983003 $ 480.00\n 7983004 $ 655.00\n 7983007 $ 1,685.20\n 7983008 $ 515.90\n 7983009 $ 94.20\n 7983010 $ 6,207.50\n 7983011 $ 20,916.30\n 7983012 $ 7,913.00\n 7983013 $ 1,047.00\n 7983015 $ 2.00\n 7983017 $ 1,300.00\n 7983018 $ 116.20\n 7983019 $ 15.00\n 7983024 $ 0.06\n 7983029 $ 20.42\n 7983030 $ 16.56\n 7983031 $ 21.00\n 7983034 $ 185.76\n 7983037 $ 10,110.00\n 7983038 $ 1,950.00\n 7983039 $ 3,698.90\n 7983040 $ 4,207.20\n 7983041 $ 989.20\n 7983042 $ 27,529.50\n 7983043 $ 5,673.50\n 7983044 $ 1,815.77\n 7983045 $ 73.28\n 7983046 $ 1,225.88\n 7983047 $ 2,077.10\n 7983049 $ 166.60\n 7983050 $ 935.70\n 7983051 $ 5,580.30\n 7983052 $ 17,760.72\n 7983053 $ 4,914.24\n 7983055 $ 9.42\n 7983057 $ 29.20\n 7983059 $ 8,279.70\n 7983060 $ 18,158.72\n 7983062 $ 4,970.00\n 7983066 $ 3,920.00\n 7983067 $ 92.80\n 7983071 $ 370.88\n 7983073 $ 50,198.40\n 7983074 $ 105,796.48\n 7983075 $ 56,556.96\n 7983076 $ 78,512.00\n 7983077 $ 27,191.60\n 7983078 $ 1,204.70\n 7983079 $ 1,206.40\n 7983081 $ 7,415.04\n 7983082 $ 6,290.50\n 7983083 $ 33,170.60\n 7983084 $ 4,277.30\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 20 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7983085 $ 69,751.10\n 7983086 $ 14,418.40\n 7983087 $ 1,838.88\n 7983088 $ 1,372.80\n 7983089 $ 2,740.16\n 7983090 $ 34,488.00\n 7983091 $ 8,524.70\n 7983092 $ 3,783.90\n 7983093 $ 305.70\n 7983094 $ 1,440.00\n 7983095 $ 6,672.00\n 7983096 $ 2,268.70\n 7983097 $ 2,363.90\n 7983100 $ 2,695.20\n 7983101 $ 1,442.40\n 7983103 $ 9,413.92\n 7983104 $ 76,336.38\n 7983105 $ 519.60\n 7983107 $ 5,233.60\n 7983108 $ 124,531.52\n 7983109 $ 7,481.84\n 7983110 $ 577.84\n 7983111 $ 7,413.44\n 7983113 $ 10,457.92\n 7983114 $ 262,194.91\n 7983115 $ 1,174.30\n 7983116 $ 4,774.72\n 7983117 $ 45,126.70\n 7983118 $ 7,393.34\n 7983119 $ 157,520.78\n 7983120 $ 426,859.44\n 7983121 $ 383.40\n 7983122 $ 517.90\n 7983123 $ 167.60\n 7983124 $ 56.40\n 7983125 $ 111.70\n 7983126 $ 111.80\n 7983127 $ 435.80\n 7983128 $ 14,737.16\n 7983129 $ 95.20\n 7983130 $ 53,241.76\n 7983134 $ 30,333.50\n 7983138 $ 14,264.64\n 7983139 $ 921.90\n 7983140 $ 8,888.96\n 7983141 $ 53,572.32\n 7983142 $ 145,386.48\n 7983144 $ 4,484.00\n 7983145 $ 2,199.00\n 7983147 $ 6,670.00\n 7983150 $ 1,010.08\n 7983151 $ 4,289.60\n 7983152 $ 6,786.88\n 7983154 $ 32.00\n 7983159 $ 328.64\n 7983160 $ 9,031.84\n 7983161 $ 388.16\n 7983162 $ 23.88\n 7983163 $ 9.34\n 7983164 $ 2.80\n 7983165 $ 2,866.00\n 7983166 $ 204,915.36\n 7983167 $ 78,142.88\n 7983168 $ 74.20\n 7983171 $ 30.54\n 7983177 $ 800.00\n 7983183 $ 42,314.80\n 7983184 $ 9,909.76\n 7983187 $ 33.20\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 21 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7983188 $ 12.24\n 7983190 $ 120.50\n 7983192 $ 118.50\n 7983194 $ 118.60\n 7983195 $ 119.80\n 7983196 $ 116.40\n 7983207 $ 115.60\n 7983218 $ 121.80\n 7983219 $ 121.80\n 7983220 $ 121.80\n 7983221 $ 121.80\n 7983224 $ 2.16\n 7983225 $ 4.72\n 7983232 $ 11.92\n 7983253 $ 158.00\n 7983260 $ 2.56\n 7983264 $ 40.00\n 7983274 $ 8.00\n 7983275 $ 9.60\n 7983277 $ 408.40\n 7983287 $ 4.64\n 7983294 $ 0.16\n 7983296 $ 80.00\n 7983299 $ 281.12\n 7983307 $ 8.00\n 7983311 $ 0.80\n 7983312 $ 1.60\n 7983319 $ 8.00\n 7983327 $ 20.00\n 7983330 $ 40.00\n 7983348 $ 7.84\n 7983351 $ 38.00\n 7983361 $ 11.04\n 7983363 $ 41.44\n 7983365 $ 4.80\n 7983370 $ 3.04\n 7983384 $ 14.08\n 7983393 $ 0.16\n 7983395 $ 40.00\n 7983398 $ 1.28\n 7983403 $ 28.00\n 7983408 $ 16.00\n 7983411 $ 0.16\n 7983413 $ 6.00\n 7983416 $ 8.00\n 7983424 $ 2.24\n 7983427 $ 0.32\n 7983428 $ 73.16\n 7983433 $ 22.00\n 7983452 $ 40.00\n 7983453 $ 19.68\n 7983454 $ 1.60\n 7983472 $ 0.16\n 7983479 $ 72.00\n 7983492 $ 9.30\n 7983493 $ 680.00\n 7983496 $ 0.80\n 7983497 $ 1.60\n 7983499 $ 16.00\n 7983507 $ 1.60\n 7983510 $ 4.80\n 7983519 $ 9.28\n 7983527 $ 0.16\n 7983532 $ 5.44\n 7983533 $ 326.56\n 7983537 $ 24.00\n 7983552 $ 112.00\n 7983554 $ 9.60\n 7983557 $ 1.60\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 22 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7983558 $ 5.00\n 7983559 $ 2.40\n 7983583 $ 80.00\n 7983594 $ 2,198.00\n 7983598 $ 0.80\n 7983599 $ 405.92\n 7983615 $ 405.84\n 7983616 $ 48.00\n 7983621 $ 63.52\n 7983624 $ 5.44\n 7983628 $ 393.00\n 7983635 $ 0.16\n 7983636 $ 0.32\n 7983638 $ 0.16\n 7983639 $ 58.56\n 7983661 $ 120.00\n 7983662 $ 48.84\n 7983666 $ 0.06\n 7983680 $ 122.00\n 7983685 $ 22.56\n 7983704 $ 1.60\n 7983708 $ 5.92\n 7983712 $ 24.00\n 7983713 $ 32.00\n 7983716 $ 8.00\n 7983719 $ 16.00\n 7983725 $ 80.10\n 7983732 $ 80.00\n 7983738 $ 495.84\n 7983779 $ 16.00\n 7983789 $ 160.00\n 7983790 $ 0.96\n 7983798 $ 376.88\n 7983805 $ 77.12\n 7983815 $ 2.40\n 7983816 $ 345.04\n 7983828 $ 64.00\n 7983831 $ 0.16\n 7983839 $ 8.00\n 7983849 $ 0.80\n 7983861 $ 0.32\n 7983865 $ 0.10\n 7983884 $ 4.00\n 7983890 $ 139.20\n 7983891 $ 3.04\n 7983918 $ 4.52\n 7983929 $ 1.60\n 7983933 $ 120.00\n 7983962 $ 46.80\n 7983970 $ 11.36\n 7983973 $ 2.40\n 7983975 $ 52.16\n 7983979 $ 5.28\n 7983992 $ 10.08\n 7983993 $ 204.32\n 7984007 $ 9,612.80\n 7984043 $ 4.48\n 7984045 $ 1.12\n 7984079 $ 80.00\n 7984085 $ 160.00\n 7984086 $ 40.00\n 7984090 $ 3.20\n 7984094 $ 1.28\n 7984109 $ 43.60\n 7984115 $ 0.16\n 7984125 $ 800.00\n 7984127 $ 0.32\n 7984134 $ 0.64\n 7984157 $ 2.24\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 23 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7984164 $ 4.16\n 7984166 $ 14.72\n 7984174 $ 19.52\n 7984194 $ 16.00\n 7984227 $ 320.00\n 7984233 $ 0.10\n 7984234 $ 16.00\n 7984247 $ 1,321.12\n 7984255 $ 56.00\n 7984257 $ 4.80\n 7984259 $ 0.48\n 7984265 $ 16.39\n 7984267 $ 0.90\n 7984269 $ 19.11\n 7984275 $ 0.59\n 7984276 $ 0.18\n 7984279 $ 0.05\n 7984287 $ 1.20\n 7984291 $ 0.06\n 7984296 $ 26.67\n 7984379 $ 8,802.04\n 7984380 $ 0.14\n 7984383 $ 12.68\n 7984388 $ 0.06\n 7984389 $ 1.60\n 7984392 $ 0.08\n 7984398 $ 0.06\n 7984399 $ 10.40\n 7984403 $ 326.20\n 7984407 $ 16.00\n 7984416 $ 0.20\n 7984418 $ 1.80\n 7984419 $ 0.64\n 7984422 $ 1.60\n 7984425 $ 19.68\n 7984430 $ 8.00\n 7984431 $ 108.80\n 7984433 $ 2.88\n 7984435 $ 9.60\n 7984437 $ 3.20\n 7984446 $ 5.44\n 7984450 $ 1.60\n 7984451 $ 4.80\n 7984452 $ 4.56\n 7984462 $ 6.16\n 7984464 $ 1.12\n 7984467 $ 3.20\n 7984471 $ 8.00\n 7984472 $ 13.70\n 7984474 $ 16.00\n 7984476 $ 16.30\n 7984478 $ 16.00\n 7984479 $ 1,906.72\n 7984480 $ 6.00\n 7984493 $ 0.64\n 7984500 $ 0.64\n 7984503 $ 4.80\n 7984525 $ 1.60\n 7984526 $ 56.00\n 7984530 $ 0.16\n 7984534 $ 560.00\n 7984539 $ 0.16\n 7984543 $ 640.00\n 7984545 $ 4.80\n 7984549 $ 2.40\n 7984553 $ 80.00\n 7984555 $ 208.32\n 7984557 $ 5.60\n 7984559 $ 64.00\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 24 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7984561 $ 3.20\n 7984566 $ 59.04\n 7984573 $ 0.08\n 7984574 $ 8.00\n 7984576 $ 227.52\n 7984577 $ 82.40\n 7984578 $ 16.00\n 7984579 $ 240.00\n 7984581 $ 80.00\n 7984584 $ 4.00\n 7984586 $ 1.60\n 7984589 $ 49.12\n 7984592 $ 2.40\n 7984593 $ 36.16\n 7984594 $ 160.00\n 7984598 $ 7.20\n 7984603 $ 92.00\n 7984606 $ 720.00\n 7984609 $ 0.48\n 7984610 $ 0.96\n 7984614 $ 44.32\n 7984618 $ 80.00\n 7984620 $ 340.00\n 7984622 $ 208.00\n 7984625 $ 1.60\n 7984645 $ 8.80\n 7984652 $ 16.00\n 7984654 $ 0.64\n 7984657 $ 80.00\n 7984658 $ 523.20\n 7984660 $ 18.84\n 7984662 $ 2.56\n 7984666 $ 0.16\n 7984667 $ 46.40\n 7984670 $ 4.48\n 7984677 $ 191.50\n 7984691 $ 8.00\n 7984696 $ 0.16\n 7984699 $ 1,103.00\n 7984707 $ 384.00\n 7984712 $ 8.00\n 7984713 $ 25.44\n 7984714 $ 0.48\n 7984716 $ 2.88\n 7984723 $ 240.00\n 7984724 $ 209.76\n 7984725 $ 0.48\n 7984728 $ 3.68\n 7984731 $ 64.00\n 7984735 $ 70.40\n 7984736 $ 128.00\n 7984744 $ 1.28\n 7984745 $ 3.48\n 7984746 $ 16.00\n 7984747 $ 0.32\n 7984748 $ 80.00\n 7984761 $ 11.20\n 7984762 $ 24.64\n 7984766 $ 640.00\n 7984771 $ 16.00\n 7984773 $ 32.00\n 7984775 $ 160.00\n 7984778 $ 24.00\n 7984780 $ 64.16\n 7984785 $ 3.84\n 7984791 $ 640.00\n 7984793 $ 616.00\n 7984798 $ 65.76\n 7984801 $ 376.00\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 25 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7984803 $ 312.00\n 7984804 $ 12.00\n 7984813 $ 8.96\n 7984814 $ 6.80\n 7984819 $ 1.12\n 7984821 $ 2.24\n 7984823 $ 28,501.92\n 7984824 $ 121.20\n 7984825 $ 103.68\n 7984832 $ 80.00\n 7984839 $ 4.80\n 7984841 $ 20.00\n 7984844 $ 2.88\n 7984846 $ 5.28\n 7984848 $ 8.32\n 7984851 $ 5,059.52\n 7984855 $ 29.20\n 7984858 $ 20.00\n 7984860 $ 10,034.72\n 7984867 $ 0.32\n 7984868 $ 5.76\n 7984871 $ 2.56\n 7984874 $ 3.36\n 7984877 $ 512.00\n 7984879 $ 0.96\n 7984880 $ 182.00\n 7984884 $ 4.80\n 7984888 $ 16.00\n 7984905 $ 5.44\n 7984908 $ 400.00\n 7984912 $ 0.80\n 7984918 $ 5.60\n 7984920 $ 5.44\n 7984928 $ 7.92\n 7984935 $ 1.30\n 7984960 $ 4.16\n 7985037 $ 1.28\n 7985057 $ 2.00\n 7985078 $ 0.10\n 7985105 $ 0.10\n 7985107 $ 0.40\n 7985131 $ 0.50\n 7985142 $ 1.10\n 7985150 $ 0.80\n 7985159 $ 0.30\n 7985175 $ 4.00\n 7985177 $ 0.80\n 7985178 $ 6.00\n 7985187 $ 1.50\n 7985198 $ 3.20\n 7985202 $ 0.32\n 7985213 $ 735.28\n 7985220 $ 11.20\n 7985224 $ 0.10\n 7985229 $ 1.60\n 7985232 $ 1.44\n 7985235 $ 0.16\n 7985239 $ 1.60\n 7985249 $ 127.20\n 7985254 $ 4,434.09\n 7985258 $ 57.44\n 7985259 $ 38.00\n 7985263 $ 160.00\n 7985264 $ 0.80\n 7985278 $ 10.88\n 7985279 $ 8.00\n 7985299 $ 0.16\n 7985302 $ 0.16\n 7985304 $ 0.32\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 26 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7985319 $ 1.60\n 7985325 $ 160.00\n 7985331 $ 6.00\n 7985341 $ 8.00\n 7985348 $ 42.24\n 7985356 $ 0.16\n 7985360 $ 17.60\n 7985361 $ 1.60\n 7985363 $ 560.00\n 7985365 $ 928.00\n 7985396 $ 0.09\n 7985404 $ 2.10\n 7985411 $ 6.00\n 7985425 $ 72.00\n 7985437 $ 2.08\n 7985438 $ 0.16\n 7985440 $ 112.00\n 7985445 $ 121.62\n 7985467 $ 160.00\n 7985472 $ 0.32\n 7985485 $ 16.00\n 7985489 $ 34.40\n 7985503 $ 42.88\n 7985513 $ 30.08\n 7985542 $ 11.84\n 7985544 $ 1,220.00\n 7985547 $ 88.00\n 7985549 $ 9.60\n 7985555 $ 0.16\n 7985557 $ 6.00\n 7985563 $ 24.00\n 7985572 $ 10.00\n 7985577 $ 16.00\n 7985599 $ 16.00\n 7985608 $ 0.16\n 7985614 $ 0.16\n 7985635 $ 7.50\n 7985644 $ 7.36\n 7985651 $ 35.20\n 7985661 $ 72.00\n 7985662 $ 16.00\n 7985665 $ 246.08\n 7985670 $ 624.00\n 7985680 $ 14.16\n 7985690 $ 7.04\n 7985692 $ 3.20\n 7985725 $ 480.00\n 7985744 $ 10.40\n 7985751 $ 88.00\n 7985762 $ 9.60\n 7985763 $ 6.08\n 7985765 $ 0.80\n 7985774 $ 29.92\n 7985785 $ 8.00\n 7985789 $ 72.00\n 7985793 $ 33.60\n 7985803 $ 80.00\n 7985804 $ 16.00\n 7985805 $ 16.00\n 7985812 $ 64.64\n 7985815 $ 116.56\n 7985816 $ 640.00\n 7985821 $ 90.00\n 7985823 $ 16.00\n 7985833 $ 19.68\n 7985839 $ 16.00\n 7985842 $ 110.32\n 7985851 $ 16.32\n 7985868 $ 2.72\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 27 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7985873 $ 54.40\n 7985877 $ 640.00\n 7985879 $ 37.60\n 7985880 $ 96.00\n 7985884 $ 17.12\n 7985889 $ 1.60\n 7985890 $ 3.20\n 7985891 $ 8.00\n 7985895 $ 0.32\n 7985898 $ 120.64\n 7985900 $ 80.00\n 7985915 $ 192.00\n 7985938 $ 1.60\n 7985947 $ 1.60\n 7985966 $ 0.16\n 7985970 $ 70.88\n 7985972 $ 16.00\n 7985976 $ 2.40\n 7985977 $ 0.32\n 7985979 $ 122.40\n 7985980 $ 1.12\n 7985983 $ 6.56\n 7985998 $ 88.64\n 7986022 $ 15.20\n 7986026 $ 60.00\n 7986037 $ 80.00\n 7986038 $ 289.90\n 7986052 $ 61.44\n 7986068 $ 20.00\n 7986077 $ 0.32\n 7986087 $ 0.48\n 7986090 $ 9.60\n 7986093 $ 4.00\n 7986100 $ 16.00\n 7986108 $ 1,673.76\n 7986109 $ 480.00\n 7986113 $ 12.00\n 7986125 $ 28.96\n 7986127 $ 0.16\n 7986143 $ 1.28\n 7986167 $ 0.08\n 7986174 $ 3,666.54\n 7986175 $ 0.70\n 7986178 $ 3.20\n 7986181 $ 78.80\n 7986182 $ 1.50\n 7986186 $ 0.48\n 7986187 $ 120.00\n 7986196 $ 1.60\n 7986199 $ 2.88\n 7986214 $ 0.16\n 7986215 $ 1.60\n 7986217 $ 106.04\n 7986220 $ 16.00\n 7986221 $ 7.68\n 7986222 $ 3.20\n 7986234 $ 232.80\n 7986237 $ 0.16\n 7986240 $ 12.64\n 7986242 $ 1.60\n 7986247 $ 9.60\n 7986248 $ 3.20\n 7986249 $ 27.84\n 7986253 $ 0.80\n 7986262 $ 0.80\n 7986265 $ 139.20\n 7986266 $ 4.00\n 7986273 $ 1.60\n 7986277 $ 13.00\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 28 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7986284 $ 1.14\n 7986290 $ 75.00\n 7986309 $ 120.00\n 7986312 $ 120.24\n 7986314 $ 6.20\n 7986316 $ 24.00\n 7986317 $ 1.60\n 7986319 $ 4.80\n 7986327 $ 3.04\n 7986332 $ 0.32\n 7986335 $ 1.60\n 7986336 $ 9.00\n 7986339 $ 0.96\n 7986346 $ 6.40\n 7986352 $ 1.60\n 7986354 $ 0.80\n 7986355 $ 12.00\n 7986356 $ 28.00\n 7986357 $ 0.80\n 7986362 $ 14.84\n 7986365 $ 16.00\n 7986367 $ 6.40\n 7986372 $ 16.00\n 7986378 $ 0.16\n 7986379 $ 2.40\n 7986380 $ 13.92\n 7986382 $ 80.00\n 7986397 $ 256.00\n 7986428 $ 5.28\n 7986439 $ 0.80\n 7986453 $ 45.50\n 7986454 $ 5.76\n 7986459 $ 78.08\n 7986469 $ 4.00\n 7986478 $ 631.84\n 7986479 $ 280.00\n 7986482 $ 2.40\n 7986483 $ 518.24\n 7986485 $ 16.00\n 7986489 $ 2.40\n 7986490 $ 311.36\n 7986506 $ 1,120.00\n 7986507 $ 192.00\n 7986515 $ 29.04\n 7986517 $ 8.48\n 7986518 $ 65.60\n 7986530 $ 10.00\n 7986543 $ 160.00\n 7986547 $ 160.00\n 7986550 $ 1.28\n 7986551 $ 2,720.00\n 7986559 $ 66.40\n 7986561 $ 12.00\n 7986563 $ 35,658.72\n 7986565 $ 10.40\n 7986566 $ 2,020.70\n 7986568 $ 64.00\n 7986573 $ 132.80\n 7986575 $ 5.12\n 7986577 $ 9.28\n 7986578 $ 48.00\n 7986580 $ 18.72\n 7986584 $ 896.00\n 7986586 $ 16.00\n 7986588 $ 22.56\n 7986589 $ 60.00\n 7986590 $ 2.40\n 7986592 $ 48.00\n 7986594 $ 160.00\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 29 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7986595 $ 80.00\n 7986602 $ 80.00\n 7986603 $ 1,327.92\n 7986607 $ 120.00\n 7986608 $ 12.00\n 7986614 $ 0.80\n 7986620 $ 19.36\n 7986622 $ 0.16\n 7986628 $ 2.08\n 7986630 $ 14.80\n 7986634 $ 3.20\n 7986640 $ 3.20\n 7986643 $ 0.80\n 7986647 $ 0.16\n 7986656 $ 4.80\n 7986663 $ 1.60\n 7986665 $ 384.96\n 7986667 $ 8.00\n 7986668 $ 0.64\n 7986675 $ 3.20\n 7986676 $ 32.00\n 7986680 $ 0.32\n 7986688 $ 5.60\n 7986692 $ 1.60\n 7986693 $ 8.00\n 7986696 $ 68.00\n 7986700 $ 8.00\n 7986704 $ 6.72\n 7986710 $ 12.80\n 7986711 $ 8.00\n 7986713 $ 80.00\n 7986717 $ 20.00\n 7986718 $ 40.00\n 7986721 $ 8.00\n 7986725 $ 1.44\n 7986728 $ 64.00\n 7986730 $ 80.00\n 7986731 $ 12.80\n 7986732 $ 421.76\n 7986735 $ 320.00\n 7986736 $ 0.50\n 7986742 $ 0.18\n 7986743 $ 4.00\n 7986744 $ 45.60\n 7986745 $ 12.00\n 7986747 $ 52.00\n 7986748 $ 12.00\n 7986752 $ 8.00\n 7986758 $ 440.00\n 7986761 $ 6.56\n 7986763 $ 70.00\n 7986768 $ 1.60\n 7986772 $ 178.40\n 7986773 $ 62.16\n 7986776 $ 382.72\n 7986784 $ 1.60\n 7986788 $ 12.48\n 7986789 $ 26.56\n 7986796 $ 0.48\n 7986798 $ 7,988.84\n 7986804 $ 4.32\n 7986807 $ 0.90\n 7986810 $ 480.00\n 7986813 $ 2,400.00\n 7986817 $ 71.20\n 7986822 $ 0.80\n 7986824 $ 80.00\n 7986826 $ 16.32\n 7986827 $ 0.96\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 30 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7986830 $ 32.00\n 7986832 $ 1.89\n 7986834 $ 14.40\n 7986839 $ 66.51\n 7986843 $ 86.40\n 7986847 $ 3.20\n 7986853 $ 0.40\n 7986854 $ 0.70\n 7986899 $ 0.60\n 7986912 $ 5.20\n 7986914 $ 116.40\n 7986918 $ 116.40\n 7986919 $ 116.10\n 7986920 $ 115.20\n 7986921 $ 118.00\n 7986923 $ 115.70\n 7986924 $ 118.90\n 7986926 $ 34.60\n 7986929 $ 8.90\n 7986935 $ 3.00\n 7986936 $ 25.20\n 7986938 $ 10.10\n 7986952 $ 0.50\n 7986964 $ 1.30\n 7986965 $ 1,670.88\n 7986966 $ 9,070.80\n 7986967 $ 120.00\n 7986968 $ 1,018.08\n 7986969 $ 292.00\n 7986970 $ 244.96\n 7986971 $ 22.40\n 7986974 $ 480.00\n 7986975 $ 846.40\n 7986976 $ 90.40\n 7986977 $ 284.16\n 7986978 $ 660.80\n 7986985 $ 100.00\n 7986986 $ 1,643.04\n 7986987 $ 758.40\n 7986988 $ 160.00\n 7986989 $ 1,440.00\n 7986991 $ 3,000.00\n 7986992 $ 104.00\n 7986996 $ 500.00\n 7986997 $ 700.00\n 7986998 $ 215.04\n 7986999 $ 2,098.00\n 7987000 $ 400.00\n 7987001 $ 1,000.00\n 7987002 $ 219.84\n 7987003 $ 80.00\n 7987004 $ 48.00\n 7987005 $ 152.00\n 7987006 $ 1,896.80\n 7987009 $ 160.00\n 7987011 $ 1,600.00\n 7987012 $ 240.00\n 7987017 $ 240.00\n 7987018 $ 548.80\n 7987020 $ 4,000.00\n 7987021 $ 440.00\n 7987023 $ 21.00\n 7987024 $ 176.00\n 7987025 $ 320.00\n 7987027 $ 2,560.00\n 7987029 $ 800.00\n 7987031 $ 1,643.04\n 7987032 $ 544.00\n 7987034 $ 4,000.00\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 31 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7987035 $ 960.00\n 7987036 $ 47.20\n 7987040 $ 80.00\n 7987047 $ 80.00\n 7987048 $ 400.00\n 7987049 $ 480.00\n 7987050 $ 64.00\n 7987051 $ 4,201.92\n 7987053 $ 248.00\n 7987055 $ 8.00\n 7987059 $ 0.32\n 7987061 $ 8.00\n 7987062 $ 8.00\n 7987063 $ 160.00\n 7987068 $ 9.28\n 7987070 $ 4.80\n 7987075 $ 0.64\n 7987088 $ 20.32\n 7987089 $ 40.00\n 7987092 $ 3.20\n 7987097 $ 19.20\n 7987098 $ 0.48\n 7987100 $ 0.64\n 7987102 $ 19.08\n 7987103 $ 7.68\n 7987107 $ 40.00\n 7987111 $ 1.92\n 7987115 $ 0.64\n 7987117 $ 8.00\n 7987119 $ 12.00\n 7987122 $ 1.44\n 7987126 $ 1.60\n 7987129 $ 0.80\n 7987131 $ 16.00\n 7987133 $ 1.16\n 7987134 $ 0.80\n 7987137 $ 6.72\n 7987142 $ 26.58\n 7987145 $ 44.00\n 7987147 $ 0.60\n 7987152 $ 3.20\n 7987155 $ 0.12\n 7987157 $ 1.36\n 7987158 $ 2.08\n 7987159 $ 5.60\n 7987169 $ 1.60\n 7987172 $ 1.60\n 7987183 $ 0.32\n 7987191 $ 1.00\n 7987236 $ 1,241.60\n 7987246 $ 80.00\n 7987247 $ 70.56\n 7987252 $ 120.00\n 7987275 $ 432.00\n 7987288 $ 22.40\n 7987290 $ 96.00\n 7987296 $ 1,200.00\n 7987313 $ 160.96\n 7987343 $ 322.40\n 7987353 $ 8.00\n 7987367 $ 166.00\n 7987379 $ 6.16\n 7987387 $ 8.00\n 7987420 $ 6.24\n 7987423 $ 51.84\n 7987430 $ 22,860.00\n 7987432 $ 0.16\n 7987442 $ 10.00\n 7987471 $ 0.32\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 32 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7987477 $ 280.00\n 7987491 $ 30.00\n 7987500 $ 9.76\n 7987507 $ 2.10\n 7987515 $ 624.00\n 7987521 $ 23,280.78\n 7987537 $ 4.80\n 7987540 $ 33.04\n 7987543 $ 3.52\n 7987544 $ 4,800.00\n 7987545 $ 316.32\n 7987547 $ 64.00\n 7987552 $ 64.00\n 7987558 $ 49.28\n 7987565 $ 2.40\n 7987573 $ 32.00\n 7987574 $ 10.00\n 7987576 $ 6.00\n 7987581 $ 460.00\n 7987585 $ 8.00\n 7987601 $ 480.00\n 7987613 $ 45.00\n 7987616 $ 0.96\n 7987632 $ 20.16\n 7987641 $ 0.32\n 7987667 $ 8.00\n 7987706 $ 0.16\n 7987722 $ 9.92\n 7987732 $ 30.00\n 7987736 $ 2.72\n 7987744 $ 310.00\n 7987751 $ 40.00\n 7987755 $ 58.00\n 7987765 $ 1,723.92\n 7987771 $ 12.32\n 7987774 $ 92.70\n 7987776 $ 0.80\n 7987800 $ 4.00\n 7987803 $ 350.00\n 7987815 $ 84.00\n 7987831 $ 2.08\n 7987841 $ 78.00\n 7987848 $ 40.00\n 7987849 $ 8.32\n 7987850 $ 8.00\n 7987852 $ 20.80\n 7987855 $ 3.20\n 7987856 $ 88.00\n 7987857 $ 0.48\n 7987868 $ 1.20\n 7987892 $ 10.24\n 7987907 $ 405.60\n 7987920 $ 116.80\n 7987927 $ 128.48\n 7987959 $ 7.36\n 7987964 $ 0.16\n 7987990 $ 1.28\n 7987993 $ 0.80\n 7988003 $ 0.32\n 7988007 $ 0.10\n 7988012 $ 0.32\n 7988013 $ 80.00\n 7988016 $ 18.08\n 7988026 $ 0.48\n 7988033 $ 0.32\n 7988045 $ 224.00\n 7988047 $ 1.92\n 7988059 $ 30.00\n 7988060 $ 6.40\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 33 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7988087 $ 0.32\n 7988089 $ 0.32\n 7988095 $ 10.40\n 7988103 $ 16.00\n 7988104 $ 1.60\n 7988113 $ 16.16\n 7988116 $ 0.48\n 7988122 $ 0.48\n 7988127 $ 24.96\n 7988129 $ 76.00\n 7988130 $ 89.40\n 7988133 $ 16.00\n 7988135 $ 0.16\n 7988136 $ 320.00\n 7988147 $ 240.00\n 7988160 $ 0.32\n 7988179 $ 48.00\n 7988188 $ 3.20\n 7988189 $ 1.28\n 7988198 $ 4.00\n 7988205 $ 4.80\n 7988206 $ 48.00\n 7988225 $ 8.00\n 7988226 $ 11.20\n 7988232 $ 32.00\n 7988244 $ 0.16\n 7988248 $ 160.00\n 7988250 $ 1,960.00\n 7988254 $ 16.00\n 7988261 $ 400.00\n 7988263 $ 80.00\n 7988266 $ 5.12\n 7988268 $ 16.00\n 7988274 $ 704.00\n 7988276 $ 176.00\n 7988279 $ 695.28\n 7988300 $ 0.08\n 7988312 $ 80.00\n 7988322 $ 32.00\n 7988332 $ 0.16\n 7988336 $ 2.72\n 7988337 $ 1.60\n 7988340 $ 16.00\n 7988352 $ 16.00\n 7988354 $ 3.20\n 7988361 $ 32.00\n 7988363 $ 48.00\n 7988364 $ 32.00\n 7988365 $ 132.00\n 7988370 $ 184.00\n 7988379 $ 16.00\n 7988380 $ 32.00\n 7988382 $ 360.00\n 7988396 $ 0.90\n 7988403 $ 12.00\n 7988405 $ 16.00\n 7988409 $ 8.00\n 7988410 $ 565.76\n 7988414 $ 48.00\n 7988418 $ 96.00\n 7988435 $ 80.00\n 7988436 $ 16.00\n 7988438 $ 48.00\n 7988448 $ 20.96\n 7988450 $ 3.36\n 7988453 $ 2.08\n 7988455 $ 1.60\n 7988458 $ 0.16\n 7988459 $ 8.00\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 34 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7988460 $ 9.92\n 7988461 $ 5.44\n 7988466 $ 48.32\n 7988470 $ 163.10\n 7988475 $ 1.92\n 7988477 $ 4.96\n 7988479 $ 24.00\n 7988480 $ 92.00\n 7988481 $ 0.96\n 7988486 $ 8.00\n 7988490 $ 18.24\n 7988491 $ 736.00\n 7988492 $ 12.64\n 7988500 $ 0.64\n 7988503 $ 0.32\n 7988504 $ 32.00\n 7988505 $ 1.44\n 7988507 $ 28.80\n 7988510 $ 1.90\n 7988511 $ 200.48\n 7988513 $ 0.30\n 7988514 $ 7.20\n 7988519 $ 0.16\n 7988520 $ 1.12\n 7988526 $ 933.92\n 7988528 $ 80.80\n 7988529 $ 8.00\n 7988533 $ 10.40\n 7988535 $ 11.20\n 7988539 $ 16.00\n 7988540 $ 3.20\n 7988542 $ 5.92\n 7988547 $ 2.56\n 7988548 $ 32.00\n 7988550 $ 320.00\n 7988552 $ 1,400.00\n 7988556 $ 449.44\n 7988557 $ 60.00\n 7988559 $ 120.00\n 7988563 $ 40.00\n 7988564 $ 48.00\n 7988565 $ 32.00\n 7988566 $ 20.96\n 7988569 $ 4.00\n 7988574 $ 1,122.56\n 7988575 $ 154.40\n 7988584 $ 8.00\n 7988588 $ 6.88\n 7988590 $ 0.96\n 7988592 $ 35.52\n 7988596 $ 69.44\n 7988597 $ 40.00\n 7988598 $ 48.00\n 7988599 $ 37.60\n 7988600 $ 258.88\n 7988607 $ 128.00\n 7988609 $ 25.44\n 7988616 $ 15.00\n 7988629 $ 394.00\n 7988630 $ 123.20\n 7988632 $ 160.00\n 7988633 $ 0.96\n 7988634 $ 160.00\n 7988641 $ 16.00\n 7988642 $ 902.00\n 7988643 $ 400.00\n 7988645 $ 3,400.00\n 7988646 $ 1.60\n 7988647 $ 9.60\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 35 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7988648 $ 0.72\n 7988653 $ 0.16\n 7988657 $ 1,152.00\n 7988664 $ 17.28\n 7988666 $ 480.00\n 7988672 $ 0.80\n 7988679 $ 280.00\n 7988681 $ 0.16\n 7988682 $ 4.00\n 7988686 $ 1.60\n 7988687 $ 80.00\n 7988691 $ 2.56\n 7988697 $ 112.00\n 7988698 $ 16.00\n 7988700 $ 640.00\n 7988702 $ 3.20\n 7988707 $ 196.00\n 7988708 $ 64.00\n 7988709 $ 2.40\n 7988710 $ 536.00\n 7988713 $ 12.64\n 7988714 $ 1,440.00\n 7988715 $ 0.96\n 7988718 $ 0.80\n 7988721 $ 400.00\n 7988722 $ 132.00\n 7988727 $ 1,360.00\n 7988728 $ 96.00\n 7988729 $ 168.00\n 7988731 $ 96.00\n 7988733 $ 160.00\n 7988734 $ 4.00\n 7988735 $ 18.00\n 7988737 $ 1,320.00\n 7988738 $ 1.28\n 7988739 $ 4.80\n 7988741 $ 4.00\n 7988743 $ 1.00\n 7988745 $ 60.00\n 7988746 $ 0.80\n 7988749 $ 3,728.00\n 7988752 $ 0.80\n 7988753 $ 0.64\n 7988754 $ 4.80\n 7988755 $ 4.80\n 7988757 $ 480.00\n 7988758 $ 1.60\n 7988760 $ 12.80\n 7988764 $ 160.00\n 7988765 $ 8.00\n 7988766 $ 37.76\n 7988767 $ 8.00\n 7988771 $ 8,400.00\n 7988773 $ 224.00\n 7988775 $ 6.72\n 7988776 $ 8.00\n 7988777 $ 480.00\n 7988780 $ 0.48\n 7988782 $ 34.72\n 7988784 $ 0.32\n 7988787 $ 480.00\n 7988790 $ 0.80\n 7988794 $ 98.00\n 7988795 $ 8.32\n 7988796 $ 60.00\n 7988802 $ 5,185.84\n 7988804 $ 0.16\n 7988807 $ 105.60\n 7988815 $ 40.00\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 36 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7988817 $ 16.00\n 7988819 $ 0.16\n 7988826 $ 1.44\n 7988827 $ 2.24\n 7988828 $ 1.92\n 7988829 $ 0.40\n 7988837 $ 2,328.61\n 7988840 $ 318.60\n 7988869 $ 160.00\n 7988905 $ 32.00\n 7988908 $ 0.32\n 7988911 $ 12.80\n 7988913 $ 578.48\n 7988916 $ 68.56\n 7988925 $ 32.00\n 7988940 $ 82.00\n 7988944 $ 288.00\n 7988946 $ 32.00\n 7988950 $ 48.00\n 7988953 $ 112.00\n 7988957 $ 80.00\n 7988962 $ 3,713.60\n 7988963 $ 10.56\n 7988967 $ 0.16\n 7988969 $ 39.52\n 7988972 $ 72.00\n 7988975 $ 80.00\n 7988976 $ 80.00\n 7988980 $ 577.60\n 7988987 $ 0.96\n 7988992 $ 160.00\n 7988995 $ 16.00\n 7988999 $ 12.80\n 7989011 $ 0.20\n 7989012 $ 1.60\n 7989013 $ 6.40\n 7989014 $ 7.00\n 7989053 $ 0.32\n 7989059 $ 0.16\n 7989063 $ 40.00\n 7989068 $ 0.64\n 7989094 $ 2.40\n 7989098 $ 413.12\n 7989110 $ 2.40\n 7989121 $ 0.48\n 7989125 $ 0.12\n 7989126 $ 4.32\n 7989134 $ 44.48\n 7989144 $ 8.00\n 7989147 $ 59.20\n 7989148 $ 32.00\n 7989152 $ 0.96\n 7989181 $ 80.00\n 7989187 $ 3.20\n 7989191 $ 0.16\n 7989210 $ 160.00\n 7989212 $ 480.08\n 7989222 $ 1.37\n 7989227 $ 13.68\n 7989235 $ 3.20\n 7989239 $ 0.16\n 7989249 $ 1.00\n 7989288 $ 16.00\n 7989290 $ 64.00\n 7989293 $ 8.42\n 7989295 $ 326.40\n 7989317 $ 23.20\n 7989327 $ 1.44\n 7989334 $ 4.80\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 37 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7989336 $ 468.00\n 7989337 $ 36.00\n 7989347 $ 80.00\n 7989365 $ 5.60\n 7989385 $ 5.60\n 7989386 $ 8.05\n 7989392 $ 20.32\n 7989393 $ 0.64\n 7989399 $ 320.00\n 7989405 $ 320.00\n 7989413 $ 25.60\n 7989419 $ 0.16\n 7989427 $ 64.00\n 7989434 $ 72.48\n 7989437 $ 0.64\n 7989438 $ 12.00\n 7989448 $ 24.00\n 7989465 $ 0.96\n 7989468 $ 32.00\n 7989470 $ 112.00\n 7989479 $ 2.30\n 7989489 $ 95.08\n 7989499 $ 400.00\n 7989506 $ 234.52\n 7989532 $ 294.00\n 7989533 $ 4.80\n 7989536 $ 48.00\n 7989539 $ 405.12\n 7989547 $ 864.56\n 7989552 $ 1,260.00\n 7989558 $ 0.16\n 7989567 $ 0.16\n 7989577 $ 9.60\n 7989581 $ 90.88\n 7989582 $ 962.06\n 7989584 $ 3.20\n 7989592 $ 16.00\n 7989600 $ 245.44\n 7989608 $ 0.16\n 7989620 $ 140.48\n 7989636 $ 8.00\n 7989651 $ 7.50\n 7989652 $ 46.72\n 7989659 $ 4.80\n 7989687 $ 0.16\n 7989702 $ 1.60\n 7989703 $ 608.00\n 7989714 $ 4.16\n 7989716 $ 2,232.00\n 7989731 $ 0.32\n 7989735 $ 16.80\n 7989743 $ 79.36\n 7989744 $ 112.80\n 7989752 $ 0.10\n 7989763 $ 4.80\n 7989764 $ 40.00\n 7989766 $ 24.96\n 7989777 $ 128.64\n 7989785 $ 110.00\n 7989788 $ 0.16\n 7989789 $ 8.00\n 7989790 $ 0.80\n 7989795 $ 1.60\n 7989796 $ 1.60\n 7989797 $ 48.00\n 7989800 $ 16.00\n 7989802 $ 1.28\n 7989827 $ 32.00\n 7989834 $ 8.00\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 38 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7989842 $ 1.60\n 7989849 $ 0.48\n 7989863 $ 1,059.51\n 7989872 $ 0.80\n 7989895 $ 16.00\n 7989906 $ 8.00\n 7989910 $ 28.00\n 7989923 $ 8.00\n 7989930 $ 2.56\n 7989933 $ 3.52\n 7989940 $ 48.00\n 7989945 $ 215.68\n 7989952 $ 7.36\n 7989956 $ 0.80\n 7989961 $ 40.96\n 7989963 $ 0.32\n 7989964 $ 24.00\n 7989976 $ 7.68\n 7989978 $ 0.08\n 7989987 $ 0.32\n 7989995 $ 18.00\n 7989997 $ 96.00\n 7990003 $ 0.64\n 7990009 $ 107.52\n 7990014 $ 5,600.00\n 7990020 $ 2.40\n 7990028 $ 4.00\n 7990038 $ 16.00\n 7990046 $ 3.20\n 7990053 $ 0.80\n 7990072 $ 134.40\n 7990081 $ 3.68\n 7990104 $ 2.88\n 7990121 $ 16.00\n 7990124 $ 783.68\n 7990125 $ 4.50\n 7990129 $ 50.54\n 7990130 $ 320.00\n 7990132 $ 16.00\n 7990134 $ 7,360.00\n 7990139 $ 32.00\n 7990143 $ 0.80\n 7990144 $ 2.40\n 7990149 $ 7.68\n 7990150 $ 1.76\n 7990152 $ 1.60\n 7990161 $ 48.00\n 7990162 $ 1,563.20\n 7990163 $ 19.04\n 7990164 $ 1,368.00\n 7990167 $ 1,244.32\n 7990170 $ 200.00\n 7990171 $ 56.00\n 7990177 $ 311.68\n 7990179 $ 160.00\n 7990187 $ 41.60\n 7990189 $ 80.00\n 7990191 $ 128.00\n 7990193 $ 40.00\n 7990194 $ 80.00\n 7990202 $ 5.44\n 7990205 $ 4.00\n 7990206 $ 48.00\n 7990209 $ 176.00\n 7990210 $ 18.40\n 7990212 $ 16.00\n 7990218 $ 0.02\n 7990222 $ 8.00\n 7990237 $ 208.00\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 39 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7990243 $ 18.24\n 7990250 $ 63.84\n 7990274 $ 20.08\n 7990275 $ 16.63\n 7990276 $ 235.00\n 7990278 $ 4.80\n 7990279 $ 102.40\n 7990281 $ 2.96\n 7990290 $ 1.28\n 7990294 $ 3.60\n 7990295 $ 917.33\n 7990300 $ 0.16\n 7990308 $ 21.76\n 7990310 $ 32.00\n 7990311 $ 48.00\n 7990312 $ 12.00\n 7990314 $ 960.00\n 7990316 $ 24.80\n 7990319 $ 21.60\n 7990320 $ 60.00\n 7990323 $ 160.00\n 7990326 $ 16.00\n 7990331 $ 16.00\n 7990332 $ 3.20\n 7990334 $ 1.60\n 7990335 $ 16.00\n 7990337 $ 10.56\n 7990339 $ 0.16\n 7990344 $ 192.00\n 7990348 $ 0.48\n 7990350 $ 1.60\n 7990352 $ 1.66\n 7990354 $ 160.00\n 7990355 $ 16.00\n 7990358 $ 32.00\n 7990360 $ 40.00\n 7990361 $ 192.00\n 7990362 $ 1,060.00\n 7990363 $ 0.06\n 7990372 $ 110.00\n 7990377 $ 0.32\n 7990378 $ 80.00\n 7990381 $ 80.00\n 7990383 $ 24,000.00\n 7990397 $ 9.60\n 7990401 $ 90.08\n 7990407 $ 40.00\n 7990415 $ 32.00\n 7990425 $ 0.06\n 7990434 $ 44.16\n 7990441 $ 0.80\n 7990449 $ 0.08\n 7990450 $ 6.00\n 7990451 $ 2.08\n 7990452 $ 2.08\n 7990453 $ 2,400.00\n 7990458 $ 36.80\n 7990465 $ 4.80\n 7990469 $ 320.00\n 7990471 $ 211.36\n 7990473 $ 8.00\n 7990475 $ 1,760.00\n 7990479 $ 1,557.60\n 7990488 $ 4.80\n 7990492 $ 0.32\n 7990493 $ 59.60\n 7990495 $ 40.00\n 7990497 $ 60.40\n 7990499 $ 50.56\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 40 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7990504 $ 32.00\n 7990505 $ 754.92\n 7990506 $ 16.00\n 7990507 $ 10,100.00\n 7990509 $ 5.00\n 7990510 $ 8.00\n 7990511 $ 19.20\n 7990513 $ 160.00\n 7990516 $ 32.00\n 7990517 $ 0.16\n 7990520 $ 175.20\n 7990522 $ 160.00\n 7990525 $ 1,600.00\n 7990527 $ 14.00\n 7990530 $ 160.00\n 7990532 $ 14.78\n 7990539 $ 1,600.00\n 7990543 $ 48.00\n 7990545 $ 80.00\n 7990550 $ 1,859.16\n 7990558 $ 68.96\n 7990560 $ 1,704.00\n 7990561 $ 240.00\n 7990569 $ 8.80\n 7990582 $ 160.00\n 7990589 $ 320.00\n 7990592 $ 800.00\n 7990593 $ 0.16\n 7990596 $ 57.60\n 7990597 $ 45.60\n 7990602 $ 160.00\n 7990604 $ 206.88\n 7990606 $ 0.48\n 7990610 $ 2.24\n 7990613 $ 52.02\n 7990623 $ 136.00\n 7990625 $ 40.00\n 7990629 $ 8.00\n 7990631 $ 128.00\n 7990636 $ 5.60\n 7990637 $ 30.40\n 7990644 $ 64.00\n 7990646 $ 160.00\n 7990647 $ 320.00\n 7990650 $ 1.28\n 7990651 $ 144.00\n 7990657 $ 80.00\n 7990658 $ 855.88\n 7990659 $ 128.00\n 7990660 $ 1,360.00\n 7990664 $ 32.00\n 7990665 $ 11.20\n 7990666 $ 56.00\n 7990667 $ 416.00\n 7990673 $ 600.00\n 7990676 $ 440.00\n 7990677 $ 160.00\n 7990686 $ 2,560.00\n 7990688 $ 160.00\n 7990689 $ 144.00\n 7990690 $ 79.04\n 7990692 $ 180.00\n 7990696 $ 6.40\n 7990697 $ 40.00\n 7990705 $ 800.00\n 7990707 $ 69.28\n 7990709 $ 27.96\n 7990710 $ 208.00\n 7990713 $ 167.68\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 41 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7990723 $ 500.00\n 7990724 $ 238.00\n 7990725 $ 91.84\n 7990727 $ 192.00\n 7990730 $ 22.40\n 7990731 $ 797.76\n 7990733 $ 0.64\n 7990735 $ 3.20\n 7990737 $ 80.00\n 7990740 $ 24.00\n 7990741 $ 16.00\n 7990745 $ 512.00\n 7990751 $ 171.68\n 7990752 $ 2,440.00\n 7990757 $ 16.80\n 7990760 $ 480.00\n 7990764 $ 9,937.76\n 7990768 $ 8.00\n 7990775 $ 464.00\n 7990779 $ 137.60\n 7990783 $ 5.60\n 7990784 $ 1,680.00\n 7990785 $ 8.00\n 7990792 $ 24.00\n 7990795 $ 240.00\n 7990797 $ 12.60\n 7990798 $ 160.00\n 7990801 $ 80.00\n 7990805 $ 16.00\n 7990809 $ 2.00\n 7990811 $ 14.40\n 7990814 $ 1.44\n 7990820 $ 0.30\n 7990821 $ 6.00\n 7990822 $ 0.32\n 7990825 $ 0.90\n 7990827 $ 18.32\n 7990832 $ 1.02\n 7990833 $ 3.00\n 7990844 $ 0.84\n 7990852 $ 2,320.00\n 7990856 $ 10.08\n 7990857 $ 640.00\n 7990860 $ 16.00\n 7990861 $ 177.44\n 7990862 $ 4,496.80\n 7990864 $ 16.00\n 7990868 $ 80.00\n 7990869 $ 17.28\n 7990882 $ 151,672.00\n 7990883 $ 80.00\n 7990884 $ 80.00\n 7990889 $ 46.08\n 7990890 $ 32.00\n 7990891 $ 16.00\n 7990901 $ 80.00\n 7990903 $ 24.00\n 7990908 $ 24.96\n 7990911 $ 0.16\n 7990913 $ 32.00\n 7990914 $ 20.16\n 7990924 $ 320.00\n 7990931 $ 40.00\n 7990943 $ 2.00\n 7990944 $ 15.20\n 7990954 $ 0.64\n 7990957 $ 3.20\n 7990965 $ 0.32\n 7990966 $ 4.00\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 42 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7990968 $ 0.48\n 7990973 $ 40.00\n 7990975 $ 48.00\n 7990982 $ 397.28\n 7990984 $ 160.00\n 7990993 $ 170.24\n 7991005 $ 14.00\n 7991006 $ 0.16\n 7991019 $ 48.00\n 7991052 $ 156.72\n 7991060 $ 1.92\n 7991063 $ 12.00\n 7991064 $ 1.60\n 7991065 $ 92.96\n 7991066 $ 8.00\n 7991074 $ 16.00\n 7991083 $ 0.16\n 7991102 $ 0.32\n 7991103 $ 1,426.64\n 7991108 $ 18.00\n 7991111 $ 902.32\n 7991121 $ 526.72\n 7991123 $ 32.00\n 7991148 $ 4.00\n 7991181 $ 64.00\n 7991190 $ 1.92\n 7991192 $ 8.00\n 7991194 $ 16.00\n 7991204 $ 0.32\n 7991207 $ 20.00\n 7991215 $ 28.80\n 7991216 $ 16.00\n 7991226 $ 134.40\n 7991232 $ 16.00\n 7991242 $ 17.28\n 7991256 $ 0.32\n 7991259 $ 1.12\n 7991267 $ 0.48\n 7991270 $ 4.00\n 7991271 $ 40.00\n 7991300 $ 2.50\n 7991311 $ 12.00\n 7991314 $ 190.40\n 7991318 $ 0.16\n 7991332 $ 124.80\n 7991336 $ 36.00\n 7991340 $ 311.26\n 7991347 $ 824.00\n 7991350 $ 8.00\n 7991383 $ 160.00\n 7991403 $ 15.68\n 7991407 $ 103.84\n 7991411 $ 7.28\n 7991413 $ 1.76\n 7991423 $ 18.40\n 7991424 $ 2.88\n 7991425 $ 4.00\n 7991426 $ 8.16\n 7991427 $ 6.74\n 7991436 $ 0.96\n 7991438 $ 5.00\n 7991440 $ 77.52\n 7991450 $ 80.00\n 7991460 $ 16.00\n 7991472 $ 61.12\n 7991495 $ 6.00\n 7991503 $ 32.00\n 7991505 $ 9.60\n 7991527 $ 17.44\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 43 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7991555 $ 0.80\n 7991573 $ 48.00\n 7991581 $ 10.24\n 7991582 $ 1.60\n 7991583 $ 300.00\n 7991587 $ 20.32\n 7991594 $ 0.08\n 7991620 $ 1.92\n 7991621 $ 240.00\n 7991623 $ 1.60\n 7991624 $ 0.32\n 7991625 $ 160.00\n 7991633 $ 0.48\n 7991640 $ 8.00\n 7991660 $ 8.00\n 7991664 $ 0.32\n 7991667 $ 5.78\n 7991670 $ 72.72\n 7991695 $ 634.24\n 7991696 $ 0.16\n 7991703 $ 31.04\n 7991710 $ 16.00\n 7991712 $ 32.80\n 7991735 $ 0.10\n 7991738 $ 63.84\n 7991746 $ 46.88\n 7991759 $ 8.32\n 7991773 $ 112.00\n 7991774 $ 8.00\n 7991775 $ 18.24\n 7991793 $ 0.48\n 7991794 $ 151.20\n 7991797 $ 4.16\n 7991812 $ 0.16\n 7991832 $ 0.16\n 7991837 $ 172.80\n 7991848 $ 9.76\n 7991854 $ 27.60\n 7991870 $ 16.00\n 7991878 $ 5.12\n 7991884 $ 0.64\n 7991887 $ 0.64\n 7991893 $ 2.56\n 7991908 $ 0.64\n 7991924 $ 80.00\n 7991925 $ 16.16\n 7991932 $ 3.20\n 7991940 $ 16.00\n 7991949 $ 4.00\n 7991956 $ 3.20\n 7991964 $ 0.32\n 7991966 $ 1.60\n 7991972 $ 84.00\n 7991974 $ 6.40\n 7992016 $ 2.56\n 7992034 $ 16.00\n 7992049 $ 164.96\n 7992051 $ 0.40\n 7992055 $ 7.04\n 7992058 $ 216.00\n 7992088 $ 8.00\n 7992089 $ 87.52\n 7992098 $ 1.20\n 7992100 $ 0.48\n 7992102 $ 16.00\n 7992112 $ 8.00\n 7992119 $ 4.02\n 7992120 $ 30.00\n 7992129 $ 600.00\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 44 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7992146 $ 10.00\n 7992151 $ 0.80\n 7992168 $ 0.16\n 7992173 $ 0.48\n 7992177 $ 3.20\n 7992180 $ 25.60\n 7992190 $ 48.00\n 7992191 $ 0.06\n 7992195 $ 1.28\n 7992198 $ 2,232.34\n 7992206 $ 0.48\n 7992207 $ 8.00\n 7992210 $ 17.66\n 7992212 $ 4.00\n 7992214 $ 693.00\n 7992215 $ 0.06\n 7992221 $ 1,309.22\n 7992228 $ 12.96\n 7992229 $ 0.16\n 7992230 $ 32.00\n 7992234 $ 4.00\n 7992237 $ 7.36\n 7992238 $ 11.20\n 7992239 $ 48.00\n 7992244 $ 160.00\n 7992270 $ 560.00\n 7992276 $ 2,432.00\n 7992278 $ 262.24\n 7992279 $ 13,113.28\n 7992280 $ 160.00\n 7992281 $ 32.00\n 7992282 $ 160.00\n 7992283 $ 24.96\n 7992284 $ 320.00\n 7992285 $ 78.40\n 7992289 $ 720.00\n 7992291 $ 24.80\n 7992295 $ 64.00\n 7992296 $ 160.00\n 7992297 $ 1,120.00\n 7992300 $ 17.60\n 7992301 $ 436.96\n 7992302 $ 641.76\n 7992303 $ 83.20\n 7992304 $ 640.00\n 7992306 $ 362.40\n 7992307 $ 2,528.00\n 7992308 $ 88.00\n 7992309 $ 432.00\n 7992310 $ 112.00\n 7992311 $ 20.00\n 7992312 $ 59.30\n 7992313 $ 192.00\n 7992314 $ 1,680.00\n 7992316 $ 48.00\n 7992317 $ 80.00\n 7992318 $ 640.00\n 7992319 $ 323.04\n 7992320 $ 186.88\n 7992323 $ 160.00\n 7992325 $ 48.00\n 7992331 $ 320.00\n 7992332 $ 8,000.00\n 7992336 $ 2,916.00\n 7992339 $ 192.00\n 7992343 $ 2.56\n 7992345 $ 3,040.00\n 7992348 $ 4,000.00\n 7992349 $ 25.20\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 45 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7992352 $ 368.00\n 7992353 $ 620.32\n 7992354 $ 2,240.00\n 7992355 $ 69.52\n 7992359 $ 64.58\n 7992362 $ 1.60\n 7992364 $ 240.00\n 7992365 $ 11.04\n 7992366 $ 29.44\n 7992367 $ 99.20\n 7992368 $ 6.40\n 7992369 $ 16.00\n 7992371 $ 50.88\n 7992372 $ 1,600.00\n 7992373 $ 64.00\n 7992374 $ 480.00\n 7992375 $ 5.92\n 7992376 $ 1,600.00\n 7992384 $ 33.60\n 7992386 $ 0.16\n 7992389 $ 27.20\n 7992392 $ 160.00\n 7992397 $ 1,680.00\n 7992399 $ 14,451.36\n 7992403 $ 0.16\n 7992404 $ 32.00\n 7992408 $ 4,112.00\n 7992411 $ 400.00\n 7992413 $ 22.20\n 7992414 $ 3,200.80\n 7992417 $ 320.00\n 7992418 $ 16.00\n 7992421 $ 7.36\n 7992422 $ 160.00\n 7992423 $ 28.00\n 7992427 $ 160.00\n 7992428 $ 0.80\n 7992431 $ 6,373.78\n 7992432 $ 480.00\n 7992436 $ 192.00\n 7992438 $ 16.00\n 7992439 $ 1,020.80\n 7992441 $ 8,400.00\n 7992445 $ 1,312.00\n 7992449 $ 48.00\n 7992450 $ 136.00\n 7992458 $ 1,600.00\n 7992459 $ 69.00\n 7992461 $ 1.60\n 7992463 $ 320.00\n 7992465 $ 560.00\n 7992467 $ 80.00\n 7992469 $ 56.00\n 7992470 $ 16.00\n 7992473 $ 1,600.00\n 7992474 $ 80.00\n 7992477 $ 29.76\n 7992481 $ 90.00\n 7992482 $ 51.60\n 7992483 $ 560.00\n 7992484 $ 696.00\n 7992485 $ 320.00\n 7992486 $ 2,560.00\n 7992489 $ 1,186.40\n 7992495 $ 1,806.66\n 7992496 $ 4,160.00\n 7992497 $ 600.00\n 7992503 $ 2,000.00\n 7992505 $ 17.60\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 46 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7992508 $ 1,208.96\n 7992509 $ 160.00\n 7992511 $ 1,232.00\n 7992514 $ 160.00\n 7992525 $ 9.92\n 7992528 $ 16.00\n 7992529 $ 3.00\n 7992530 $ 96.00\n 7992532 $ 112.00\n 7992534 $ 281.76\n 7992537 $ 7,840.00\n 7992539 $ 32.00\n 7992540 $ 1.80\n 7992545 $ 1,280.00\n 7992549 $ 28.00\n 7992551 $ 13,395.20\n 7992552 $ 53.00\n 7992554 $ 800.00\n 7992555 $ 27.52\n 7992556 $ 6,080.00\n 7992557 $ 1,920.00\n 7992564 $ 50.08\n 7992565 $ 640.00\n 7992570 $ 2,248.00\n 7992573 $ 56.00\n 7992581 $ 64.00\n 7992584 $ 24.00\n 7992586 $ 160.00\n 7992588 $ 440.00\n 7992590 $ 8.00\n 7992593 $ 16.00\n 7992599 $ 320.00\n 7992606 $ 357.12\n 7992608 $ 600.00\n 7992611 $ 1,360.00\n 7992613 $ 150.40\n 7992617 $ 600.00\n 7992623 $ 640.00\n 7992631 $ 3.20\n 7992634 $ 7.00\n 7992637 $ 800.00\n 7992639 $ 1,200.00\n 7992642 $ 19.20\n 7992647 $ 320.00\n 7992649 $ 16.00\n 7992650 $ 1,838.00\n 7992651 $ 44.00\n 7992657 $ 26.08\n 7992658 $ 489.60\n 7992666 $ 18.08\n 7992667 $ 47.00\n 7992668 $ 80.00\n 7992669 $ 24.00\n 7992677 $ 64.00\n 7992678 $ 149.76\n 7992679 $ 6,415.36\n 7992681 $ 240.00\n 7992682 $ 16.00\n 7992684 $ 202.40\n 7992688 $ 160.00\n 7992689 $ 80.00\n 7992691 $ 640.00\n 7992692 $ 136.16\n 7992696 $ 504.00\n 7992697 $ 16.00\n 7992699 $ 53.60\n 7992702 $ 96.00\n 7992708 $ 2.08\n 7992709 $ 4,690.10\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 47 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7992715 $ 160.00\n 7992716 $ 90.00\n 7992720 $ 48.00\n 7992721 $ 1,039.68\n 7992723 $ 560.00\n 7992724 $ 1,040.00\n 7992725 $ 40.00\n 7992727 $ 176.00\n 7992729 $ 480.00\n 7992733 $ 6.88\n 7992734 $ 16.00\n 7992738 $ 16.00\n 7992742 $ 16.00\n 7992744 $ 1,683.20\n 7992749 $ 80.00\n 7992750 $ 3,000.00\n 7992751 $ 360.00\n 7992757 $ 16.00\n 7992759 $ 7,840.00\n 7992760 $ 1,223.68\n 7992761 $ 0.16\n 7992764 $ 15.20\n 7992767 $ 40.00\n 7992770 $ 160.00\n 7992772 $ 480.00\n 7992775 $ 80.00\n 7992778 $ 160.00\n 7992779 $ 6,400.00\n 7992781 $ 208.00\n 7992783 $ 50.20\n 7992785 $ 10.40\n 7992786 $ 360.00\n 7992794 $ 7.84\n 7992797 $ 8.00\n 7992801 $ 421.44\n 7992803 $ 11,672.96\n 7992805 $ 160.00\n 7992806 $ 3.04\n 7992808 $ 0.16\n 7992819 $ 62.28\n 7992822 $ 4.00\n 7992834 $ 32.00\n 7992838 $ 2.88\n 7992850 $ 56.00\n 7992853 $ 68.00\n 7992875 $ 0.60\n 7992885 $ 3.20\n 7992887 $ 106.40\n 7992889 $ 6.00\n 7992892 $ 12.00\n 7992895 $ 103.04\n 7992899 $ 1.44\n 7992904 $ 83.68\n 7992905 $ 33.28\n 7992907 $ 56.00\n 7992908 $ 28.00\n 7992912 $ 240.00\n 7992913 $ 5.12\n 7992920 $ 32.00\n 7992922 $ 40.00\n 7992930 $ 112.00\n 7992931 $ 428.00\n 7992935 $ 39.20\n 7992937 $ 14.72\n 7992939 $ 16.00\n 7992945 $ 2.00\n 7992951 $ 32.00\n 7992953 $ 0.02\n 7992954 $ 10.50\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 48 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7992962 $ 80.00\n 7992966 $ 28.80\n 7992968 $ 27.52\n 7992969 $ 25.76\n 7992974 $ 5.60\n 7992975 $ 2.48\n 7992977 $ 130.96\n 7992980 $ 132.48\n 7992984 $ 52.80\n 7992991 $ 1,120.00\n 7992995 $ 30.00\n 7993005 $ 1,259.40\n 7993007 $ 120.00\n 7993013 $ 139.28\n 7993014 $ 184.32\n 7993017 $ 72.08\n 7993037 $ 1.40\n 7993040 $ 1.00\n 7993058 $ 346.00\n 7993083 $ 32.88\n 7993087 $ 24.80\n 7993088 $ 18.40\n 7993096 $ 160.00\n 7993097 $ 16.00\n 7993111 $ 1,596.20\n 7993117 $ 6.00\n 7993123 $ 0.16\n 7993130 $ 8.00\n 7993135 $ 2.06\n 7993150 $ 37.59\n 7993154 $ 160.00\n 7993158 $ 9.39\n 7993159 $ 4.80\n 7993162 $ 16.80\n 7993168 $ 0.35\n 7993169 $ 0.80\n 7993171 $ 8.00\n 7993174 $ 4.16\n 7993175 $ 1.60\n 7993176 $ 3.84\n 7993179 $ 0.16\n 7993182 $ 1.60\n 7993183 $ 2.56\n 7993198 $ 0.48\n 7993205 $ 49.44\n 7993208 $ 11.04\n 7993211 $ 0.18\n 7993212 $ 1.60\n 7993216 $ 16.00\n 7993229 $ 0.16\n 7993234 $ 12.80\n 7993236 $ 1.60\n 7993237 $ 1.32\n 7993239 $ 4.80\n 7993243 $ 0.48\n 7993246 $ 0.32\n 7993255 $ 0.06\n 7993257 $ 8.80\n 7993274 $ 0.24\n 7993275 $ 6.72\n 7993276 $ 0.20\n 7993278 $ 0.48\n 7993284 $ 0.48\n 7993285 $ 1.60\n 7993286 $ 0.12\n 7993287 $ 1.60\n 7993289 $ 26.09\n 7993290 $ 9.06\n 7993292 $ 6.40\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 49 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7993293 $ 1.60\n 7993297 $ 4.00\n 7993303 $ 81.00\n 7993304 $ 0.16\n 7993307 $ 3.04\n 7993309 $ 2.40\n 7993310 $ 11.76\n 7993315 $ 8.00\n 7993317 $ 25.27\n 7993325 $ 4.40\n 7993333 $ 0.32\n 7993336 $ 16.00\n 7993344 $ 343.52\n 7993346 $ 1.80\n 7993349 $ 0.24\n 7993350 $ 8.00\n 7993351 $ 9.60\n 7993358 $ 0.96\n 7993362 $ 0.12\n 7993364 $ 56.64\n 7993369 $ 0.32\n 7993370 $ 1.12\n 7993373 $ 3.72\n 7993377 $ 0.20\n 7993378 $ 8.00\n 7993381 $ 23.84\n 7993387 $ 8.80\n 7993388 $ 40.00\n 7993389 $ 792.00\n 7993391 $ 3.20\n 7993394 $ 0.32\n 7993396 $ 96.00\n 7993397 $ 0.08\n 7993400 $ 364.00\n 7993402 $ 122.33\n 7993405 $ 5.76\n 7993407 $ 8.00\n 7993408 $ 3.20\n 7993412 $ 1.84\n 7993413 $ 3.60\n 7993417 $ 1.12\n 7993419 $ 50.16\n 7993420 $ 1.20\n 7993423 $ 0.80\n 7993424 $ 0.32\n 7993429 $ 124.20\n 7993430 $ 0.64\n 7993432 $ 0.30\n 7993436 $ 24.00\n 7993438 $ 1.60\n 7993449 $ 136.00\n 7993450 $ 6.08\n 7993452 $ 7.42\n 7993457 $ 14.40\n 7993459 $ 0.16\n 7993464 $ 78.88\n 7993476 $ 108.48\n 7993492 $ 177.44\n 7993530 $ 10.00\n 7993543 $ 20.16\n 7993545 $ 0.16\n 7993559 $ 112.00\n 7993560 $ 33.12\n 7993563 $ 6.40\n 7993574 $ 64.00\n 7993579 $ 61.12\n 7993581 $ 80.00\n 7993584 $ 5.00\n 7993589 $ 25.02\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 50 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7993590 $ 0.96\n 7993603 $ 2.40\n 7993604 $ 16.00\n 7993612 $ 0.60\n 7993619 $ 125.36\n 7993624 $ 28,333.40\n 7993629 $ 0.16\n 7993636 $ 46.72\n 7993639 $ 32.16\n 7993640 $ 20.00\n 7993647 $ 0.96\n 7993650 $ 30.40\n 7993653 $ 48.00\n 7993657 $ 114.00\n 7993661 $ 6.00\n 7993667 $ 40.00\n 7993668 $ 16.00\n 7993689 $ 160.00\n 7993704 $ 158.56\n 7993724 $ 60.00\n 7993728 $ 20.36\n 7993731 $ 80.00\n 7993733 $ 2.08\n 7993737 $ 0.16\n 7993739 $ 4.80\n 7993745 $ 180.00\n 7993758 $ 13.76\n 7993769 $ 0.16\n 7993775 $ 864.00\n 7993776 $ 3,934.08\n 7993779 $ 0.32\n 7993781 $ 2.40\n 7993783 $ 8.88\n 7993786 $ 80.00\n 7993795 $ 24.00\n 7993796 $ 0.80\n 7993798 $ 0.80\n 7993808 $ 45.76\n 7993816 $ 0.96\n 7993821 $ 0.64\n 7993824 $ 39.68\n 7993825 $ 7.04\n 7993832 $ 160.00\n 7993844 $ 128.00\n 7993846 $ 16.00\n 7993850 $ 16.96\n 7993852 $ 0.32\n 7993857 $ 0.16\n 7993870 $ 1.12\n 7993880 $ 10.00\n 7993905 $ 0.64\n 7993916 $ 16.00\n 7993921 $ 5.76\n 7993928 $ 0.64\n 7993931 $ 0.16\n 7993952 $ 34.48\n 7993956 $ 3.36\n 7993965 $ 8.00\n 7993971 $ 48.00\n 7993981 $ 5.60\n 7993990 $ 24.00\n 7993996 $ 1.60\n 7994005 $ 600.32\n 7994009 $ 19.86\n 7994017 $ 0.16\n 7994019 $ 157.00\n 7994035 $ 7.84\n 7994042 $ 160.00\n 7994045 $ 0.96\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 51 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7994049 $ 22.40\n 7994059 $ 6.24\n 7994065 $ 5.60\n 7994067 $ 4.80\n 7994068 $ 1.60\n 7994071 $ 57.60\n 7994075 $ 0.32\n 7994087 $ 99.84\n 7994092 $ 24.00\n 7994099 $ 99.52\n 7994106 $ 1.60\n 7994107 $ 8.00\n 7994108 $ 425.00\n 7994110 $ 173.10\n 7994111 $ 10.68\n 7994112 $ 15.00\n 7994113 $ 16,500.00\n 7994116 $ 24.00\n 7994119 $ 51.04\n 7994120 $ 32.00\n 7994122 $ 1,040.00\n 7994125 $ 2.40\n 7994129 $ 225.00\n 7994133 $ 48.00\n 7994135 $ 97.60\n 7994138 $ 4,844.00\n 7994141 $ 48.00\n 7994142 $ 64.00\n 7994143 $ 48.00\n 7994145 $ 383.68\n 7994147 $ 480.00\n 7994149 $ 0.80\n 7994151 $ 3.20\n 7994152 $ 1,600.00\n 7994154 $ 114.24\n 7994155 $ 2.56\n 7994161 $ 54.40\n 7994166 $ 904.46\n 7994169 $ 28.48\n 7994170 $ 310.40\n 7994172 $ 1.60\n 7994174 $ 640.00\n 7994175 $ 32.00\n 7994184 $ 112.00\n 7994185 $ 11.84\n 7994188 $ 320.00\n 7994193 $ 932.00\n 7994202 $ 22.80\n 7994207 $ 76.80\n 7994210 $ 400.00\n 7994219 $ 179.20\n 7994227 $ 10,800.00\n 7994232 $ 6,233.28\n 7994236 $ 3,200.00\n 7994249 $ 37.60\n 7994256 $ 3,200.00\n 7994258 $ 32.00\n 7994261 $ 500.00\n 7994264 $ 16.00\n 7994272 $ 32.00\n 7994278 $ 4.64\n 7994282 $ 2,880.00\n 7994283 $ 138.18\n 7994289 $ 44.00\n 7994292 $ 640.00\n 7994295 $ 176.00\n 7994301 $ 16.00\n 7994302 $ 1.60\n 7994303 $ 70.56\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 52 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7994308 $ 54.72\n 7994309 $ 1,216.00\n 7994310 $ 32.00\n 7994312 $ 33.60\n 7994313 $ 600.00\n 7994324 $ 120.48\n 7994330 $ 8.00\n 7994332 $ 80.00\n 7994335 $ 456.00\n 7994336 $ 2,080.00\n 7994338 $ 91.52\n 7994339 $ 1.16\n 7994340 $ 6.40\n 7994350 $ 0.32\n 7994356 $ 6.40\n 7994362 $ 109.50\n 7994364 $ 160.00\n 7994368 $ 4.96\n 7994371 $ 48.00\n 7994378 $ 250.00\n 7994380 $ 480.00\n 7994389 $ 840.00\n 7994390 $ 80.00\n 7994392 $ 80.00\n 7994394 $ 80.00\n 7994397 $ 336.00\n 7994400 $ 104.00\n 7994404 $ 800.00\n 7994413 $ 120.00\n 7994415 $ 160.00\n 7994416 $ 3,808.00\n 7994417 $ 1,200.06\n 7994425 $ 400.00\n 7994427 $ 160.00\n 7994430 $ 33.92\n 7994432 $ 1,247.52\n 7994433 $ 48.00\n 7994437 $ 7,522.56\n 7994438 $ 14,324.16\n 7994441 $ 1.28\n 7994447 $ 82.40\n 7994448 $ 1.80\n 7994449 $ 3.00\n 7994450 $ 48.00\n 7994454 $ 4.80\n 7994455 $ 48.00\n 7994456 $ 2.24\n 7994458 $ 160.00\n 7994461 $ 80.00\n 7994468 $ 17.76\n 7994469 $ 882.72\n 7994477 $ 640.00\n 7994480 $ 26.16\n 7994482 $ 90.40\n 7994483 $ 6,256.00\n 7994484 $ 400.00\n 7994494 $ 14.90\n 7994495 $ 1,250.00\n 7994499 $ 1,600.00\n 7994506 $ 160.00\n 7994507 $ 1,172.80\n 7994509 $ 3.84\n 7994511 $ 440.00\n 7994512 $ 160.00\n 7994513 $ 16,098.00\n 7994517 $ 80.00\n 7994520 $ 16.00\n 7994529 $ 208.00\n 7994531 $ 480.00\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 53 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7994533 $ 1,600.00\n 7994534 $ 258.00\n 7994543 $ 8.00\n 7994546 $ 232.00\n 7994548 $ 160.00\n 7994549 $ 240.00\n 7994552 $ 320.00\n 7994557 $ 233.08\n 7994562 $ 800.00\n 7994567 $ 5,177.28\n 7994577 $ 8.00\n 7994578 $ 4,000.00\n 7994580 $ 2,940.32\n 7994581 $ 56.00\n 7994585 $ 16.96\n 7994591 $ 96.00\n 7994594 $ 0.80\n 7994598 $ 93.40\n 7994600 $ 60.00\n 7994601 $ 5.12\n 7994603 $ 240.00\n 7994607 $ 320.00\n 7994608 $ 2,850.56\n 7994609 $ 3,574.72\n 7994610 $ 169.44\n 7994612 $ 32,000.00\n 7994613 $ 651.20\n 7994614 $ 800.00\n 7994615 $ 320.00\n 7994616 $ 32.00\n 7994617 $ 240.00\n 7994622 $ 8,000.00\n 7994623 $ 43.52\n 7994624 $ 480.00\n 7994629 $ 112,195.84\n 7994630 $ 3,440.00\n 7994632 $ 14.72\n 7994633 $ 1,648.00\n 7994636 $ 32.00\n 7994637 $ 690.40\n 7994639 $ 8.00\n 7994643 $ 40.00\n 7994644 $ 10.40\n 7994645 $ 80.00\n 7994646 $ 500.00\n 7994648 $ 270.00\n 7994649 $ 64.00\n 7994650 $ 336.00\n 7994652 $ 33.30\n 7994653 $ 968.00\n 7994654 $ 6.00\n 7994655 $ 640.00\n 7994658 $ 240.00\n 7994662 $ 800.00\n 7994667 $ 56.00\n 7994668 $ 16.00\n 7994670 $ 0.64\n 7994671 $ 3,000.00\n 7994674 $ 80.00\n 7994681 $ 0.22\n 7994682 $ 0.48\n 7994684 $ 160.00\n 7994687 $ 16.00\n 7994688 $ 1,733.60\n 7994692 $ 1,600.00\n 7994695 $ 32.00\n 7994696 $ 256.00\n 7994697 $ 1,600.00\n 7994698 $ 0.48\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 54 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7994699 $ 16.80\n 7994700 $ 400.00\n 7994702 $ 16.00\n 7994706 $ 5,600.16\n 7994707 $ 32.00\n 7994708 $ 6.40\n 7994709 $ 16.00\n 7994710 $ 12.00\n 7994711 $ 80.00\n 7994712 $ 32.00\n 7994713 $ 742.72\n 7994714 $ 160.00\n 7994717 $ 1,600.00\n 7994719 $ 480.00\n 7994720 $ 8.00\n 7994723 $ 80.00\n 7994726 $ 1,100.00\n 7994729 $ 32.00\n 7994735 $ 0.06\n 7994737 $ 80.00\n 7994740 $ 3,520.00\n 7994742 $ 488.00\n 7994743 $ 960.00\n 7994745 $ 1,264.00\n 7994752 $ 30.00\n 7994755 $ 800.00\n 7994763 $ 3.20\n 7994766 $ 160.00\n 7994768 $ 3,200.00\n 7994770 $ 40.00\n 7994773 $ 160.00\n 7994774 $ 300.00\n 7994775 $ 236.48\n 7994777 $ 240.00\n 7994778 $ 240.00\n 7994782 $ 2,880.00\n 7994785 $ 32.00\n 7994786 $ 0.07\n 7994787 $ 40.00\n 7994789 $ 128.16\n 7994790 $ 664.48\n 7994794 $ 342.00\n 7994802 $ 2,200.00\n 7994805 $ 3,200.00\n 7994810 $ 14.88\n 7994814 $ 1,120.00\n 7994815 $ 960.00\n 7994816 $ 6.50\n 7994818 $ 307.20\n 7994819 $ 800.00\n 7994821 $ 112.00\n 7994823 $ 210.00\n 7994827 $ 640.00\n 7994828 $ 2,432.00\n 7994831 $ 1,400.00\n 7994843 $ 1.92\n 7994845 $ 3.00\n 7994848 $ 15.00\n 7994863 $ 36.00\n 7994866 $ 480.00\n 7994869 $ 32.00\n 7994873 $ 30.00\n 7994876 $ 16.00\n 7994880 $ 8.00\n 7994881 $ 33.60\n 7994886 $ 144.00\n 7994895 $ 80.00\n 7994896 $ 32.00\n 7994897 $ 90.00\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 55 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7994908 $ 24.00\n 7994919 $ 8.00\n 7994922 $ 2,400.00\n 7994928 $ 22.40\n 7994929 $ 16.00\n 7994943 $ 36.40\n 7994945 $ 24.00\n 7994958 $ 49.00\n 7994960 $ 560.00\n 7994967 $ 16.00\n 7994969 $ 160.00\n 7994971 $ 216.00\n 7994974 $ 34.00\n 7994976 $ 16.00\n 7994977 $ 36.00\n 7994995 $ 80.00\n 7994998 $ 156.60\n 7995000 $ 30.40\n 7995001 $ 6.00\n 7995007 $ 2.00\n 7995012 $ 16.00\n 7995016 $ 16.00\n 7995019 $ 48.16\n 7995022 $ 16.00\n 7995025 $ 15.00\n 7995027 $ 80.00\n 7995028 $ 104.00\n 7995044 $ 70.00\n 7995056 $ 814.56\n 7995058 $ 5.02\n 7995062 $ 8.00\n 7995068 $ 224.80\n 7995074 $ 16.00\n 7995077 $ 72.00\n 7995081 $ 9.00\n 7995097 $ 89.60\n 7995100 $ 1,224.00\n 7995103 $ 4.96\n 7995105 $ 7.80\n 7995108 $ 16.00\n 7995109 $ 151.20\n 7995118 $ 12.88\n 7995124 $ 16.00\n 7995126 $ 25.50\n 7995133 $ 1,535.18\n 7995137 $ 14.40\n 7995138 $ 2,240.00\n 7995146 $ 22.56\n 7995151 $ 16.00\n 7995153 $ 10.00\n 7995163 $ 24.00\n 7995164 $ 80.00\n 7995166 $ 9.00\n 7995167 $ 6.00\n 7995170 $ 1.60\n 7995171 $ 3.12\n 7995172 $ 32.00\n 7995173 $ 0.16\n 7995174 $ 1.60\n 7995178 $ 0.50\n 7995179 $ 24.00\n 7995180 $ 0.12\n 7995182 $ 1.04\n 7995185 $ 4.16\n 7995186 $ 2.08\n 7995187 $ 0.32\n 7995191 $ 4.64\n 7995194 $ 14.88\n 7995195 $ 0.48\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 56 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7995198 $ 2.40\n 7995208 $ 3.20\n 7995210 $ 1.44\n 7995213 $ 14.00\n 7995215 $ 0.60\n 7995225 $ 40.74\n 7995226 $ 16.00\n 7995227 $ 0.12\n 7995228 $ 6.90\n 7995232 $ 1.60\n 7995234 $ 3.12\n 7995237 $ 0.64\n 7995241 $ 26.44\n 7995243 $ 4.00\n 7995246 $ 41.66\n 7995251 $ 0.32\n 7995257 $ 0.45\n 7995258 $ 0.80\n 7995259 $ 28.00\n 7995261 $ 15.00\n 7995269 $ 9.28\n 7995270 $ 0.32\n 7995271 $ 0.20\n 7995272 $ 166.10\n 7995275 $ 2.72\n 7995277 $ 0.80\n 7995279 $ 22.72\n 7995282 $ 18.80\n 7995284 $ 2.56\n 7995285 $ 80.00\n 7995286 $ 0.16\n 7995288 $ 0.23\n 7995293 $ 0.64\n 7995294 $ 4.80\n 7995297 $ 15.36\n 7995298 $ 2.40\n 7995304 $ 17.20\n 7995307 $ 2.24\n 7995308 $ 5.60\n 7995311 $ 0.16\n 7995320 $ 1.60\n 7995322 $ 0.80\n 7995327 $ 16.00\n 7995330 $ 4.00\n 7995331 $ 1.60\n 7995334 $ 3.20\n 7995337 $ 49.88\n 7995339 $ 40.81\n 7995340 $ 165.60\n 7995341 $ 26.56\n 7995344 $ 17.12\n 7995345 $ 19.00\n 7995348 $ 0.64\n 7995349 $ 24.32\n 7995352 $ 2.60\n 7995356 $ 3.30\n 7995357 $ 8.32\n 7995361 $ 21.80\n 7995364 $ 26.56\n 7995367 $ 5.53\n 7995372 $ 0.80\n 7995376 $ 8.00\n 7995380 $ 8.00\n 7995382 $ 5.92\n 7995384 $ 1.60\n 7995386 $ 61.60\n 7995392 $ 33.44\n 7995395 $ 214.40\n 7995396 $ 3.20\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 57 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7995398 $ 44.04\n 7995399 $ 30.32\n 7995401 $ 16.00\n 7995408 $ 26.72\n 7995409 $ 0.48\n 7995411 $ 6.40\n 7995412 $ 19.68\n 7995413 $ 7.52\n 7995417 $ 16.80\n 7995418 $ 139.04\n 7995419 $ 163.18\n 7995425 $ 928.00\n 7995427 $ 0.06\n 7995432 $ 2.56\n 7995433 $ 1.76\n 7995438 $ 37.33\n 7995441 $ 14.40\n 7995444 $ 35.40\n 7995449 $ 21.70\n 7995453 $ 1.28\n 7995455 $ 5.70\n 7995463 $ 156.40\n 7995467 $ 0.48\n 7995470 $ 8.00\n 7995472 $ 16.00\n 7995473 $ 10.90\n 7995475 $ 23.30\n 7995476 $ 8.00\n 7995480 $ 0.80\n 7995482 $ 14.40\n 7995483 $ 8.00\n 7995484 $ 4.80\n 7995486 $ 48.00\n 7995487 $ 1.08\n 7995489 $ 74.08\n 7995491 $ 79.90\n 7995493 $ 49.00\n 7995506 $ 0.48\n 7995521 $ 11.20\n 7995528 $ 32.16\n 7995530 $ 64.96\n 7995531 $ 34.80\n 7995542 $ 2.00\n 7995543 $ 32.00\n 7995555 $ 4.32\n 7995556 $ 32.00\n 7995560 $ 0.16\n 7995565 $ 16.00\n 7995573 $ 117.60\n 7995581 $ 208.00\n 7995597 $ 8.00\n 7995604 $ 31.20\n 7995608 $ 908.00\n 7995621 $ 21.92\n 7995626 $ 94.00\n 7995641 $ 0.48\n 7995648 $ 213.20\n 7995652 $ 160.00\n 7995657 $ 0.32\n 7995672 $ 10.00\n 7995674 $ 0.80\n 7995679 $ 14.40\n 7995681 $ 0.16\n 7995682 $ 0.48\n 7995689 $ 1.28\n 7995700 $ 4.48\n 7995704 $ 384.00\n 7995709 $ 6.00\n 7995739 $ 14.24\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 58 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7995770 $ 81.92\n 7995780 $ 19.20\n 7995785 $ 36.80\n 7995787 $ 14.00\n 7995817 $ 10.88\n 7995829 $ 16.00\n 7995830 $ 6.40\n 7995832 $ 3.52\n 7995847 $ 167.04\n 7995851 $ 690.00\n 7995853 $ 0.16\n 7995863 $ 1.60\n 7995864 $ 0.80\n 7995878 $ 16.16\n 7995887 $ 0.64\n 7995899 $ 46.08\n 7995902 $ 1.44\n 7995904 $ 100.00\n 7995911 $ 16.00\n 7995923 $ 12.80\n 7995924 $ 2.24\n 7995926 $ 16.00\n 7995942 $ 64.00\n 7995952 $ 0.80\n 7995957 $ 1.60\n 7995958 $ 9.28\n 7995966 $ 16.00\n 7995975 $ 0.80\n 7995982 $ 80.00\n 7995983 $ 72.00\n 7995997 $ 5.44\n 7996003 $ 0.80\n 7996014 $ 1,076.07\n 7996016 $ 6,376.06\n 7996035 $ 21.60\n 7996042 $ 0.80\n 7996046 $ 575.52\n 7996047 $ 1.12\n 7996050 $ 769.76\n 7996051 $ 3.20\n 7996056 $ 1.60\n 7996065 $ 23.20\n 7996070 $ 225.44\n 7996104 $ 4.48\n 7996112 $ 2.24\n 7996118 $ 8.32\n 7996128 $ 16.00\n 7996131 $ 8.00\n 7996134 $ 1.60\n 7996138 $ 48.00\n 7996139 $ 2,076.21\n 7996141 $ 3.20\n 7996142 $ 1,232.64\n 7996145 $ 320.00\n 7996147 $ 49.80\n 7996148 $ 64.00\n 7996149 $ 6.00\n 7996157 $ 8,400.00\n 7996158 $ 17.60\n 7996160 $ 3.20\n 7996161 $ 160.00\n 7996162 $ 800.00\n 7996163 $ 18.88\n 7996165 $ 8.00\n 7996167 $ 12,368.31\n 7996170 $ 56.00\n 7996173 $ 10.40\n 7996183 $ 7.84\n 7996184 $ 0.32\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 59 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7996186 $ 32.00\n 7996191 $ 320.00\n 7996193 $ 16.00\n 7996194 $ 2,971.20\n 7996202 $ 250.00\n 7996214 $ 16.00\n 7996217 $ 120.00\n 7996220 $ 3,200.00\n 7996221 $ 80.00\n 7996222 $ 591.10\n 7996224 $ 16.00\n 7996226 $ 42.00\n 7996231 $ 35.00\n 7996243 $ 96.32\n 7996245 $ 32.00\n 7996247 $ 80.00\n 7996250 $ 372.16\n 7996251 $ 480.00\n 7996254 $ 403.02\n 7996261 $ 8.00\n 7996262 $ 3.20\n 7996265 $ 64.00\n 7996269 $ 152.00\n 7996273 $ 1,920.00\n 7996276 $ 1,465.50\n 7996277 $ 6.40\n 7996279 $ 4,320.00\n 7996283 $ 175.03\n 7996288 $ 581.60\n 7996290 $ 9,786.88\n 7996291 $ 26.24\n 7996294 $ 13.60\n 7996295 $ 320.00\n 7996301 $ 151.20\n 7996308 $ 1,600.00\n 7996309 $ 40.00\n 7996310 $ 400.00\n 7996317 $ 32.00\n 7996320 $ 7.20\n 7996323 $ 212.98\n 7996327 $ 183.20\n 7996333 $ 679.22\n 7996334 $ 12,800.00\n 7996343 $ 18.40\n 7996348 $ 196.00\n 7996352 $ 12.64\n 7996356 $ 3.20\n 7996359 $ 2.72\n 7996360 $ 25.60\n 7996363 $ 96.00\n 7996375 $ 0.16\n 7996376 $ 84.50\n 7996377 $ 74.88\n 7996384 $ 72.48\n 7996387 $ 43.20\n 7996395 $ 80.00\n 7996397 $ 2,732.80\n 7996398 $ 160.00\n 7996401 $ 24.00\n 7996403 $ 4,320.00\n 7996406 $ 280.00\n 7996411 $ 1.92\n 7996419 $ 112.00\n 7996422 $ 16.00\n 7996426 $ 2,080.00\n 7996427 $ 0.80\n 7996429 $ 2.24\n 7996433 $ 28.88\n 7996436 $ 10.00\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 60 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7996441 $ 29.48\n 7996447 $ 4.00\n 7996451 $ 1,120.00\n 7996453 $ 5,795.20\n 7996454 $ 320.00\n 7996455 $ 1,300.00\n 7996458 $ 16.00\n 7996461 $ 160.00\n 7996462 $ 24.00\n 7996469 $ 320.16\n 7996471 $ 118.40\n 7996475 $ 144.00\n 7996477 $ 3,958.50\n 7996480 $ 247.50\n 7996483 $ 377.60\n 7996484 $ 160.00\n 7996486 $ 0.16\n 7996497 $ 1,600.00\n 7996501 $ 31.36\n 7996502 $ 44.00\n 7996505 $ 64.00\n 7996509 $ 64.00\n 7996513 $ 80.00\n 7996514 $ 32.00\n 7996517 $ 50.00\n 7996518 $ 382.40\n 7996519 $ 1,638.40\n 7996520 $ 204.80\n 7996526 $ 2,400.00\n 7996527 $ 320.00\n 7996529 $ 105.76\n 7996536 $ 2.50\n 7996538 $ 4.80\n 7996539 $ 320.00\n 7996540 $ 320.00\n 7996541 $ 32.00\n 7996545 $ 64.00\n 7996548 $ 0.64\n 7996550 $ 1,160.00\n 7996557 $ 3.20\n 7996560 $ 832.00\n 7996563 $ 800.00\n 7996566 $ 59.52\n 7996568 $ 190.00\n 7996577 $ 1,596.72\n 7996580 $ 320.00\n 7996585 $ 1,880.00\n 7996588 $ 128.00\n 7996589 $ 3.20\n 7996590 $ 11.20\n 7996592 $ 4.48\n 7996593 $ 58.02\n 7996598 $ 27.20\n 7996599 $ 4,960.00\n 7996600 $ 26.08\n 7996601 $ 160.00\n 7996602 $ 1,566.08\n 7996603 $ 8,320.00\n 7996606 $ 1,184.00\n 7996607 $ 1.60\n 7996611 $ 312.00\n 7996613 $ 439.36\n 7996614 $ 914.56\n 7996615 $ 640.00\n 7996619 $ 1,040.00\n 7996620 $ 16.00\n 7996621 $ 8,480.00\n 7996623 $ 32.64\n 7996628 $ 7,192.00\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 61 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7996631 $ 80.00\n 7996637 $ 600.00\n 7996639 $ 23,641.53\n 7996640 $ 15.84\n 7996643 $ 724.90\n 7996646 $ 15.20\n 7996647 $ 1,280.00\n 7996650 $ 38.40\n 7996652 $ 0.48\n 7996656 $ 20.00\n 7996657 $ 16.00\n 7996659 $ 20.00\n 7996660 $ 1.44\n 7996661 $ 320.00\n 7996662 $ 40.00\n 7996665 $ 2,000.00\n 7996671 $ 48.00\n 7996675 $ 1,308.00\n 7996676 $ 22,083.22\n 7996679 $ 1.60\n 7996681 $ 400.00\n 7996683 $ 6.56\n 7996685 $ 640.00\n 7996686 $ 2.40\n 7996687 $ 149.60\n 7996689 $ 88.80\n 7996692 $ 12.00\n 7996693 $ 2.24\n 7996701 $ 16.00\n 7996702 $ 31.84\n 7996703 $ 32.00\n 7996705 $ 1,089.04\n 7996709 $ 144.00\n 7996712 $ 200.00\n 7996716 $ 52.00\n 7996717 $ 49.12\n 7996718 $ 32.00\n 7996722 $ 2.08\n 7996724 $ 6.40\n 7996725 $ 159.84\n 7996727 $ 5,600.00\n 7996729 $ 2.08\n 7996734 $ 0.48\n 7996736 $ 108.96\n 7996737 $ 4.00\n 7996738 $ 720.00\n 7996741 $ 8.64\n 7996743 $ 320.00\n 7996749 $ 72.00\n 7996751 $ 8.00\n 7996754 $ 240.00\n 7996756 $ 10.00\n 7996758 $ 480.00\n 7996759 $ 8.00\n 7996767 $ 80.00\n 7996769 $ 115.52\n 7996770 $ 20.00\n 7996778 $ 1.78\n 7996779 $ 7,520.00\n 7996785 $ 6.00\n 7996790 $ 894.08\n 7996795 $ 4,564.72\n 7996800 $ 160.00\n 7996805 $ 600.00\n 7996808 $ 1,760.00\n 7996810 $ 48.00\n 7996811 $ 160.00\n 7996813 $ 116.48\n 7996814 $ 480.00\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 62 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7996819 $ 166.00\n 7996820 $ 29.60\n 7996822 $ 120.00\n 7996824 $ 1.12\n 7996827 $ 189.76\n 7996828 $ 320.00\n 7996829 $ 192.00\n 7996831 $ 24.00\n 7996839 $ 48.00\n 7996841 $ 15.20\n 7996846 $ 640.00\n 7996847 $ 1.60\n 7996848 $ 0.16\n 7996852 $ 304.00\n 7996855 $ 1.60\n 7996856 $ 0.80\n 7996857 $ 128.00\n 7996858 $ 7.14\n 7996860 $ 62.40\n 7996862 $ 960.00\n 7996865 $ 0.80\n 7996868 $ 196.00\n 7996871 $ 160.00\n 7996873 $ 320.00\n 7996876 $ 20,500.00\n 7996881 $ 73.20\n 7996882 $ 80.38\n 7996883 $ 8.00\n 7996884 $ 8.00\n 7996886 $ 40.00\n 7996888 $ 16.00\n 7996891 $ 2.00\n 7996892 $ 150.00\n 7996894 $ 8.94\n 7996895 $ 480.00\n 7996903 $ 47.92\n 7996904 $ 9.22\n 7996908 $ 8.00\n 7996910 $ 8.00\n 7996911 $ 8.00\n 7996920 $ 494.10\n 7996921 $ 43.50\n 7996923 $ 2.00\n 7996931 $ 2.00\n 7996935 $ 2.00\n 7996938 $ 16.00\n 7996948 $ 2.00\n 7996951 $ 2.00\n 7996952 $ 6.00\n 7996956 $ 5.00\n 7996971 $ 10.92\n 7996991 $ 6.00\n 7996994 $ 26.94\n 7996999 $ 24.00\n 7997003 $ 15.72\n 7997006 $ 6.00\n 7997007 $ 6.00\n 7997008 $ 18.00\n 7997019 $ 7.38\n 7997026 $ 180.00\n 7997048 $ 6.00\n 7997071 $ 6.00\n 7997072 $ 6.00\n 7997075 $ 20.93\n 7997081 $ 6.48\n 7997201 $ 31.68\n 7997202 $ 16.00\n 7997208 $ 75.50\n 7997209 $ 1.40\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 63 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7997217 $ 43.66\n 7997219 $ 3.00\n 7997221 $ 54.00\n 7997223 $ 10.72\n 7997224 $ 1.14\n 7997227 $ 20.30\n 7997228 $ 13.74\n 7997230 $ 1.76\n 7997231 $ 5.58\n 7997232 $ 3.00\n 7997234 $ 0.16\n 7997241 $ 5.60\n 7997243 $ 21.50\n 7997244 $ 9.60\n 7997248 $ 1.60\n 7997249 $ 1.36\n 7997252 $ 4.50\n 7997253 $ 7.20\n 7997254 $ 0.16\n 7997256 $ 6.00\n 7997258 $ 5.00\n 7997259 $ 254.40\n 7997261 $ 0.48\n 7997262 $ 1.44\n 7997265 $ 2.30\n 7997266 $ 87.36\n 7997268 $ 6.40\n 7997269 $ 0.91\n 7997270 $ 12.00\n 7997273 $ 14.00\n 7997284 $ 0.80\n 7997286 $ 7.20\n 7997290 $ 0.02\n 7997293 $ 35.04\n 7997294 $ 3.20\n 7997295 $ 0.02\n 7997296 $ 2.56\n 7997298 $ 0.64\n 7997299 $ 78.30\n 7997308 $ 6.32\n 7997310 $ 6.40\n 7997311 $ 3.42\n 7997316 $ 12.00\n 7997317 $ 96.06\n 7997318 $ 2.89\n 7997322 $ 47.88\n 7997323 $ 0.08\n 7997324 $ 134.96\n 7997329 $ 2.40\n 7997331 $ 0.32\n 7997335 $ 11.20\n 7997336 $ 11.36\n 7997337 $ 16.00\n 7997340 $ 174.40\n 7997341 $ 0.18\n 7997343 $ 23.20\n 7997348 $ 23.22\n 7997351 $ 120.00\n 7997353 $ 25.60\n 7997355 $ 0.06\n 7997356 $ 24.00\n 7997357 $ 9.60\n 7997358 $ 0.48\n 7997361 $ 3.20\n 7997364 $ 12.88\n 7997365 $ 120.30\n 7997373 $ 24.48\n 7997374 $ 8.88\n 7997375 $ 29.12\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 64 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7997377 $ 9.00\n 7997380 $ 0.40\n 7997381 $ 0.16\n 7997387 $ 7.68\n 7997388 $ 5.60\n 7997390 $ 0.16\n 7997391 $ 1.60\n 7997392 $ 2.32\n 7997393 $ 128.56\n 7997394 $ 36.00\n 7997395 $ 2.40\n 7997396 $ 3.68\n 7997400 $ 6.12\n 7997403 $ 12.00\n 7997406 $ 0.32\n 7997408 $ 11.52\n 7997410 $ 0.28\n 7997412 $ 2.00\n 7997413 $ 110.88\n 7997416 $ 8.70\n 7997418 $ 12.00\n 7997420 $ 12.00\n 7997423 $ 0.96\n 7997424 $ 0.06\n 7997427 $ 7.20\n 7997428 $ 0.08\n 7997429 $ 64.00\n 7997431 $ 5.00\n 7997432 $ 0.48\n 7997433 $ 0.06\n 7997434 $ 3.02\n 7997435 $ 1.68\n 7997436 $ 24.30\n 7997437 $ 18.56\n 7997438 $ 0.64\n 7997439 $ 3.20\n 7997440 $ 1.38\n 7997442 $ 0.04\n 7997446 $ 3.20\n 7997447 $ 0.32\n 7997451 $ 15.90\n 7997452 $ 0.36\n 7997453 $ 0.96\n 7997456 $ 76.35\n 7997457 $ 3.50\n 7997459 $ 0.06\n 7997460 $ 2.24\n 7997461 $ 5.56\n 7997465 $ 1.44\n 7997467 $ 8.00\n 7997471 $ 20.36\n 7997474 $ 2.34\n 7997475 $ 8.96\n 7997479 $ 189.28\n 7997481 $ 33.20\n 7997484 $ 11.22\n 7997489 $ 6.40\n 7997493 $ 0.16\n 7997494 $ 0.10\n 7997495 $ 96.92\n 7997496 $ 1.36\n 7997500 $ 4.48\n 7997502 $ 12.64\n 7997504 $ 1.26\n 7997507 $ 4.71\n 7997508 $ 6.00\n 7997510 $ 88.08\n 7997513 $ 3.20\n 7997517 $ 3.50\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 65 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7997521 $ 24.00\n 7997530 $ 67.36\n 7997539 $ 49.28\n 7997590 $ 16.00\n 7997592 $ 53.28\n 7997594 $ 265.60\n 7997602 $ 163.68\n 7997613 $ 0.32\n 7997619 $ 1.60\n 7997634 $ 32.00\n 7997648 $ 4.16\n 7997668 $ 2.00\n 7997674 $ 8.00\n 7997682 $ 48.00\n 7997683 $ 4.00\n 7997687 $ 1.00\n 7997700 $ 92.00\n 7997701 $ 7.92\n 7997710 $ 96.00\n 7997721 $ 0.48\n 7997726 $ 16.00\n 7997734 $ 1.76\n 7997740 $ 3.36\n 7997746 $ 143.70\n 7997756 $ 96.00\n 7997757 $ 410.40\n 7997764 $ 0.96\n 7997768 $ 1,223.28\n 7997785 $ 16.64\n 7997794 $ 32.00\n 7997798 $ 12.00\n 7997802 $ 68.40\n 7997807 $ 2.24\n 7997812 $ 77.80\n 7997816 $ 16.00\n 7997822 $ 0.64\n 7997839 $ 11.20\n 7997843 $ 8.80\n 7997848 $ 96.00\n 7997861 $ 576.00\n 7997864 $ 3.68\n 7997872 $ 90.00\n 7997874 $ 3.20\n 7997881 $ 8.80\n 7997884 $ 3.20\n 7997887 $ 56.00\n 7997890 $ 0.64\n 7997891 $ 0.16\n 7997897 $ 59.68\n 7997898 $ 0.64\n 7997912 $ 8.00\n 7997919 $ 8.48\n 7997933 $ 26.16\n 7997937 $ 1.44\n 7997949 $ 6.40\n 7997951 $ 0.80\n 7997956 $ 8.00\n 7997960 $ 174.56\n 7997963 $ 94.72\n 7997976 $ 0.80\n 7997979 $ 4.48\n 7997981 $ 11.70\n 7997982 $ 6.40\n 7997986 $ 16.00\n 7997995 $ 39.20\n 7998002 $ 3.20\n 7998004 $ 6.88\n 7998017 $ 18.40\n 7998018 $ 1.60\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 66 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7998029 $ 0.32\n 7998032 $ 0.80\n 7998052 $ 40.00\n 7998056 $ 1.92\n 7998059 $ 1.76\n 7998068 $ 0.96\n 7998072 $ 8.64\n 7998081 $ 78.00\n 7998086 $ 2.40\n 7998089 $ 3.20\n 7998094 $ 40.16\n 7998095 $ 1.60\n 7998096 $ 1.60\n 7998098 $ 144.00\n 7998112 $ 46.56\n 7998115 $ 24.00\n 7998119 $ 1.28\n 7998120 $ 7.56\n 7998128 $ 0.64\n 7998141 $ 4.80\n 7998142 $ 1.60\n 7998143 $ 109.20\n 7998145 $ 130.40\n 7998147 $ 5.12\n 7998150 $ 0.48\n 7998151 $ 0.96\n 7998157 $ 0.80\n 7998164 $ 1.12\n 7998174 $ 1,728.00\n 7998176 $ 40.16\n 7998177 $ 7.20\n 7998187 $ 3,200.00\n 7998190 $ 51.20\n 7998202 $ 0.64\n 7998205 $ 624.00\n 7998208 $ 112.00\n 7998211 $ 32.00\n 7998212 $ 64.00\n 7998215 $ 60.00\n 7998218 $ 7.20\n 7998219 $ 1,250.00\n 7998221 $ 376.00\n 7998222 $ 3.20\n 7998224 $ 11,642.80\n 7998225 $ 0.16\n 7998229 $ 420.00\n 7998230 $ 192.00\n 7998232 $ 57.60\n 7998234 $ 503.04\n 7998236 $ 29.44\n 7998238 $ 8.00\n 7998241 $ 8.00\n 7998242 $ 240.00\n 7998246 $ 57.28\n 7998248 $ 1,286.40\n 7998251 $ 16.00\n 7998256 $ 320.00\n 7998257 $ 6,135.84\n 7998259 $ 40.00\n 7998260 $ 3.20\n 7998261 $ 11.04\n 7998263 $ 1,200.00\n 7998264 $ 640.00\n 7998266 $ 100.80\n 7998267 $ 2.40\n 7998270 $ 480.00\n 7998272 $ 176.00\n 7998274 $ 94.72\n 7998276 $ 96.00\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 67 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7998280 $ 1.92\n 7998284 $ 14.08\n 7998290 $ 1,440.00\n 7998293 $ 2,180.00\n 7998298 $ 16.00\n 7998299 $ 5.60\n 7998305 $ 0.32\n 7998311 $ 160.00\n 7998319 $ 1.60\n 7998326 $ 64.00\n 7998330 $ 16.00\n 7998332 $ 16.00\n 7998336 $ 50.00\n 7998348 $ 73.92\n 7998352 $ 19.84\n 7998364 $ 1,232.00\n 7998365 $ 5,600.00\n 7998367 $ 2,240.00\n 7998372 $ 80.00\n 7998373 $ 16.80\n 7998374 $ 290.00\n 7998380 $ 29.44\n 7998382 $ 1.76\n 7998384 $ 1,185.00\n 7998385 $ 6.56\n 7998389 $ 8.00\n 7998396 $ 24.00\n 7998398 $ 0.16\n 7998399 $ 160.00\n 7998400 $ 2.40\n 7998403 $ 50.88\n 7998404 $ 16.00\n 7998406 $ 3.20\n 7998408 $ 5,974.16\n 7998409 $ 17.92\n 7998414 $ 2,381.28\n 7998423 $ 80.00\n 7998425 $ 96.50\n 7998435 $ 282.40\n 7998437 $ 6.24\n 7998440 $ 1.92\n 7998441 $ 698.88\n 7998442 $ 252.00\n 7998449 $ 0.80\n 7998450 $ 48.00\n 7998451 $ 160.00\n 7998452 $ 2.24\n 7998456 $ 16.00\n 7998457 $ 128.00\n 7998458 $ 880.00\n 7998459 $ 244.96\n 7998461 $ 7.12\n 7998464 $ 2.40\n 7998465 $ 3,520.00\n 7998467 $ 1,648.00\n 7998469 $ 98.00\n 7998472 $ 16.00\n 7998473 $ 40.00\n 7998475 $ 3.20\n 7998477 $ 1.44\n 7998480 $ 12.00\n 7998481 $ 7.20\n 7998485 $ 3.20\n 7998488 $ 0.16\n 7998489 $ 91.46\n 7998490 $ 0.48\n 7998492 $ 0.80\n 7998493 $ 25.28\n 7998496 $ 800.00\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 68 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7998499 $ 8.32\n 7998500 $ 128.00\n 7998501 $ 3.20\n 7998503 $ 8.00\n 7998504 $ 160.00\n 7998507 $ 0.64\n 7998508 $ 8.00\n 7998509 $ 88.00\n 7998511 $ 160.00\n 7998515 $ 1.44\n 7998516 $ 16.00\n 7998517 $ 980.00\n 7998521 $ 80.00\n 7998523 $ 40.00\n 7998527 $ 69.12\n 7998529 $ 880.96\n 7998535 $ 8.80\n 7998539 $ 800.00\n 7998551 $ 32.00\n 7998557 $ 581.00\n 7998558 $ 4.00\n 7998561 $ 240.00\n 7998563 $ 1,549.28\n 7998565 $ 89,023.68\n 7998566 $ 1,272.00\n 7998569 $ 0.80\n 7998570 $ 2.40\n 7998571 $ 7.20\n 7998572 $ 80.00\n 7998579 $ 320.00\n 7998581 $ 320.00\n 7998583 $ 4.32\n 7998584 $ 22.00\n 7998586 $ 4,240.00\n 7998587 $ 34.24\n 7998588 $ 100.16\n 7998589 $ 1.12\n 7998592 $ 120.16\n 7998594 $ 45.92\n 7998595 $ 2,240.00\n 7998597 $ 784.80\n 7998599 $ 22.00\n 7998601 $ 0.01\n 7998603 $ 2.72\n 7998605 $ 6.56\n 7998607 $ 326.40\n 7998609 $ 0.48\n 7998611 $ 0.16\n 7998612 $ 4,400.00\n 7998613 $ 1.60\n 7998616 $ 394.08\n 7998617 $ 24.00\n 7998618 $ 1,508.64\n 7998620 $ 2.88\n 7998621 $ 80.00\n 7998622 $ 3,200.00\n 7998624 $ 168.32\n 7998625 $ 0.07\n 7998626 $ 1.12\n 7998627 $ 240.00\n 7998631 $ 48.00\n 7998632 $ 1.60\n 7998635 $ 1,600.00\n 7998638 $ 0.16\n 7998640 $ 608.00\n 7998642 $ 90.24\n 7998643 $ 0.60\n 7998644 $ 16.00\n 7998646 $ 0.07\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 69 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7998647 $ 9,088.00\n 7998648 $ 680.00\n 7998650 $ 8.00\n 7998652 $ 80.00\n 7998653 $ 80.00\n 7998654 $ 800.00\n 7998659 $ 80.00\n 7998660 $ 104.16\n 7998661 $ 2.40\n 7998662 $ 5.60\n 7998665 $ 520.00\n 7998669 $ 0.07\n 7998670 $ 320.00\n 7998671 $ 33.60\n 7998672 $ 42.00\n 7998673 $ 5,600.00\n 7998674 $ 18.00\n 7998677 $ 160.00\n 7998678 $ 13.24\n 7998679 $ 2,621.28\n 7998681 $ 18,880.00\n 7998682 $ 3,040.00\n 7998683 $ 6,400.00\n 7998684 $ 64.00\n 7998685 $ 3,207.27\n 7998686 $ 2.04\n 7998687 $ 1,608.96\n 7998692 $ 144.00\n 7998694 $ 48.00\n 7998695 $ 139.52\n 7998697 $ 900.00\n 7998698 $ 741,279.52\n 7998706 $ 15,000.00\n 7998708 $ 194,925.52\n 7998709 $ 84.57\n 7998710 $ 3,200.00\n 7998711 $ 1,600.00\n 7998712 $ 24,339.04\n 7998713 $ 8,000.00\n 7998715 $ 0.01\n 7998717 $ 5.04\n 7998718 $ 6.88\n 7998719 $ 29.60\n 7998720 $ 9.36\n 7998733 $ 7.86\n 7998734 $ 46.44\n 7998735 $ 27.70\n 7998737 $ 54.24\n 7998738 $ 59.60\n 7998743 $ 0.50\n 7998744 $ 1.76\n 7998746 $ 1.76\n 7998747 $ 24.98\n 7998751 $ 4.32\n 7998761 $ 1.36\n 7998765 $ 28.40\n 7998773 $ 120.80\n 7998774 $ 10.40\n 7998775 $ 0.96\n 7998776 $ 0.72\n 7998777 $ 5.04\n 7998778 $ 16.48\n 7998780 $ 12.80\n 7998785 $ 1.12\n 7998788 $ 44.80\n 7998789 $ 5.28\n 7998790 $ 0.32\n 7998797 $ 3,200.00\n 7998799 $ 136.32\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 70 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7998800 $ 480.00\n 7998804 $ 1,600.00\n 7998812 $ 2,851.52\n 7998817 $ 1,600.00\n 7998818 $ 360.00\n 7998824 $ 200.00\n 7998825 $ 500.00\n 7998826 $ 4.00\n 7998831 $ 160.00\n 7998832 $ 1,112.00\n 7998838 $ 1,600.00\n 7998840 $ 38.40\n 7998842 $ 480.00\n 7998844 $ 32.00\n 7998845 $ 250.00\n 7998850 $ 264.00\n 7998851 $ 1,512.96\n 7998852 $ 1,290.40\n 7998856 $ 48.00\n 7998859 $ 1,680.00\n 7998862 $ 240.00\n 7998864 $ 22.40\n 7998866 $ 320.00\n 7998871 $ 48.00\n 7998873 $ 80.00\n 7998875 $ 800.00\n 7998876 $ 3,200.00\n 7998890 $ 3,200.00\n 7998892 $ 300.00\n 7998893 $ 80.00\n 7998894 $ 15,000.00\n 7998895 $ 1,103.84\n 7998896 $ 1,103.84\n 7998908 $ 392.00\n 7998912 $ 1,600.00\n 7998919 $ 80.00\n 7998941 $ 51.32\n 7998942 $ 17.44\n 7998948 $ 10.88\n 7998955 $ 1.60\n 7998958 $ 0.32\n 7998965 $ 327.04\n 7998967 $ 6.40\n 7998977 $ 1.92\n 7999000 $ 32.00\n 7999007 $ 8.00\n 7999008 $ 1.28\n 7999013 $ 160.00\n 7999016 $ 8.00\n 7999024 $ 0.16\n 7999028 $ 3.20\n 7999031 $ 1.28\n 7999038 $ 3.20\n 7999043 $ 22.40\n 7999048 $ 80.00\n 7999052 $ 0.16\n 7999056 $ 4.80\n 7999071 $ 0.16\n 7999074 $ 0.80\n 7999086 $ 0.80\n 7999087 $ 141.36\n 7999090 $ 16.00\n 7999100 $ 3.20\n 7999112 $ 24.00\n 7999115 $ 1.60\n 7999117 $ 35.00\n 7999134 $ 80.00\n 7999136 $ 2.40\n 7999139 $ 2.56\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 71 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7999141 $ 1.60\n 7999143 $ 414.40\n 7999146 $ 0.16\n 7999152 $ 0.80\n 7999154 $ 1.93\n 7999158 $ 0.80\n 7999165 $ 44.48\n 7999196 $ 0.32\n 7999201 $ 2.40\n 7999203 $ 3.20\n 7999215 $ 10.24\n 7999218 $ 167.04\n 7999226 $ 9.60\n 7999230 $ 1.60\n 7999235 $ 3.20\n 7999237 $ 1.12\n 7999240 $ 16.00\n 7999244 $ 16.00\n 7999246 $ 6.40\n 7999247 $ 66.37\n 7999248 $ 1.76\n 7999251 $ 0.16\n 7999253 $ 0.08\n 7999256 $ 67.08\n 7999257 $ 1.50\n 7999258 $ 0.64\n 7999261 $ 3.12\n 7999262 $ 12.90\n 7999263 $ 0.50\n 7999266 $ 8.00\n 7999268 $ 46.37\n 7999269 $ 8.00\n 7999271 $ 0.80\n 7999275 $ 0.08\n 7999276 $ 0.36\n 7999278 $ 6.00\n 7999279 $ 28.00\n 7999280 $ 3.12\n 7999282 $ 0.98\n 7999283 $ 80.80\n 7999284 $ 64.00\n 7999285 $ 8.00\n 7999287 $ 3.20\n 7999288 $ 8.00\n 7999289 $ 9.48\n 7999290 $ 0.57\n 7999293 $ 16.00\n 7999294 $ 0.80\n 7999296 $ 1.02\n 7999299 $ 3.20\n 7999300 $ 0.24\n 7999301 $ 22.20\n 7999304 $ 1.09\n 7999309 $ 1.28\n 7999310 $ 0.32\n 7999311 $ 0.80\n 7999313 $ 1.60\n 7999316 $ 58.96\n 7999318 $ 0.16\n 7999320 $ 224.00\n 7999321 $ 0.08\n 7999328 $ 1.60\n 7999329 $ 8.00\n 7999331 $ 3.20\n 7999332 $ 50.88\n 7999336 $ 1.80\n 7999337 $ 1.60\n 7999339 $ 16.32\n 7999340 $ 1.50\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 72 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7999342 $ 4.00\n 7999345 $ 28.00\n 7999348 $ 10.00\n 7999349 $ 3.00\n 7999350 $ 0.05\n 7999354 $ 1.28\n 7999355 $ 7.20\n 7999357 $ 0.10\n 7999359 $ 73.60\n 7999360 $ 0.42\n 7999363 $ 0.24\n 7999371 $ 0.04\n 7999375 $ 0.44\n 7999379 $ 0.54\n 7999388 $ 16.00\n 7999389 $ 3.20\n 7999392 $ 30.40\n 7999395 $ 16.00\n 7999396 $ 2.50\n 7999397 $ 0.56\n 7999399 $ 0.18\n 7999400 $ 5.60\n 7999401 $ 0.02\n 7999403 $ 8.80\n 7999405 $ 0.16\n 7999406 $ 7.60\n 7999407 $ 14.40\n 7999411 $ 120.00\n 7999412 $ 8.00\n 7999414 $ 0.32\n 7999418 $ 0.24\n 7999420 $ 4.00\n 7999421 $ 3.20\n 7999422 $ 0.80\n 7999430 $ 12.96\n 7999431 $ 8.48\n 7999433 $ 62.00\n 7999434 $ 71.04\n 7999436 $ 0.16\n 7999437 $ 6.40\n 7999438 $ 1.60\n 7999441 $ 2.88\n 7999445 $ 0.50\n 7999446 $ 2.40\n 7999450 $ 9.00\n 7999451 $ 16.00\n 7999452 $ 2.92\n 7999453 $ 1.60\n 7999454 $ 4.00\n 7999456 $ 6.96\n 7999457 $ 2.80\n 7999458 $ 0.72\n 7999459 $ 4.80\n 7999461 $ 97.30\n 7999463 $ 1.68\n 7999465 $ 0.36\n 7999466 $ 5.44\n 7999469 $ 0.32\n 7999470 $ 0.32\n 7999471 $ 0.32\n 7999472 $ 2.72\n 7999475 $ 129.88\n 7999476 $ 4.44\n 7999477 $ 3.52\n 7999478 $ 48.00\n 7999480 $ 27.76\n 7999481 $ 2.72\n 7999484 $ 0.08\n 7999486 $ 1,408.00\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 73 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7999488 $ 120.16\n 7999490 $ 0.80\n 7999492 $ 5.60\n 7999493 $ 0.80\n 7999495 $ 3.00\n 7999496 $ 0.16\n 7999497 $ 0.16\n 7999498 $ 4.00\n 7999499 $ 89.76\n 7999500 $ 7.68\n 7999505 $ 0.85\n 7999508 $ 4.00\n 7999509 $ 0.10\n 7999512 $ 0.80\n 7999513 $ 160.40\n 7999514 $ 0.16\n 7999515 $ 3.00\n 7999517 $ 17.16\n 7999518 $ 3.00\n 7999519 $ 1.60\n 7999522 $ 4.80\n 7999524 $ 12.48\n 7999529 $ 3.00\n 7999533 $ 10.32\n 7999534 $ 3.20\n 7999536 $ 6.00\n 7999537 $ 4.00\n 7999538 $ 1.60\n 7999539 $ 0.56\n 7999540 $ 4.00\n 7999541 $ 9.60\n 7999545 $ 1.60\n 7999546 $ 1.80\n 7999548 $ 4.70\n 7999550 $ 0.16\n 7999551 $ 2.00\n 7999556 $ 29.42\n 7999557 $ 0.06\n 7999558 $ 0.04\n 7999559 $ 72.00\n 7999560 $ 169.87\n 7999561 $ 8.69\n 7999563 $ 2.14\n 7999565 $ 0.20\n 7999583 $ 4.00\n 7999590 $ 71.76\n 7999591 $ 12.00\n 7999608 $ 0.16\n 7999609 $ 20.80\n 7999626 $ 64.00\n 7999640 $ 2.00\n 7999654 $ 17.38\n 7999656 $ 800.00\n 7999659 $ 8.00\n 7999684 $ 1.60\n 7999700 $ 0.48\n 7999708 $ 0.64\n 7999714 $ 2,241.92\n 7999715 $ 8.08\n 7999716 $ 21,742.56\n 7999717 $ 0.64\n 7999732 $ 26.16\n 7999741 $ 3.36\n 7999743 $ 1,638.40\n 7999744 $ 1.60\n 7999746 $ 0.16\n 7999748 $ 65.00\n 7999750 $ 1.60\n 7999751 $ 1.12\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 74 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7999761 $ 16.00\n 7999766 $ 22.08\n 7999776 $ 0.48\n 7999777 $ 0.96\n 7999789 $ 416.00\n 7999796 $ 120.00\n 7999800 $ 160.00\n 7999801 $ 1,640.00\n 7999804 $ 51.04\n 7999812 $ 5.00\n 7999819 $ 1.60\n 7999834 $ 239.36\n 7999859 $ 48.00\n 7999866 $ 80.00\n 7999867 $ 976.00\n 7999871 $ 32.00\n 7999876 $ 9.54\n 7999886 $ 8.00\n 7999890 $ 94.50\n 7999893 $ 0.64\n 7999899 $ 3.20\n 7999900 $ 175.10\n 7999909 $ 4.16\n 7999911 $ 3.20\n 7999913 $ 28.00\n 7999917 $ 16.00\n 7999921 $ 16.16\n 7999922 $ 0.96\n 7999927 $ 194.24\n 7999935 $ 24.16\n 7999936 $ 56.00\n 7999937 $ 0.64\n 7999940 $ 8.00\n 7999941 $ 0.48\n 7999953 $ 1.60\n 7999955 $ 68.00\n 7999958 $ 2.88\n 7999962 $ 4.16\n 7999973 $ 0.32\n 7999978 $ 10.92\n 7999979 $ 0.80\n 7999981 $ 56.00\n 7999985 $ 16.00\n 7999990 $ 22.00\n 7999999 $ 6.40\n 8000006 $ 0.16\n 8000012 $ 0.48\n 8000013 $ 0.48\n 8000015 $ 4.96\n 8000016 $ 17.60\n 8000024 $ 14.40\n 8000025 $ 47.50\n 8000026 $ 2.00\n 8000027 $ 12.80\n 8000030 $ 2.72\n 8000032 $ 16.00\n 8000033 $ 1.60\n 8000039 $ 1,529.04\n 8000041 $ 3.20\n 8000058 $ 1.76\n 8000060 $ 4.00\n 8000078 $ 6.40\n 8000103 $ 320.00\n 8000108 $ 5.92\n 8000112 $ 3.68\n 8000116 $ 2.40\n 8000120 $ 0.16\n 8000123 $ 4.80\n 8000127 $ 40.00\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 75 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 8000129 $ 0.96\n 8000135 $ 10.96\n 8000136 $ 24.00\n 8000139 $ 1.60\n 8000140 $ 0.64\n 8000147 $ 16.00\n 8000152 $ 1.60\n 8000159 $ 4.80\n 8000166 $ 0.32\n 8000178 $ 3.20\n 8000179 $ 14.40\n 8000193 $ 0.32\n 8000196 $ 3.20\n 8000197 $ 16.00\n 8000207 $ 9.60\n 8000211 $ 21.28\n 8000213 $ 32.00\n 8000214 $ 8.00\n 8000217 $ 48.00\n 8000222 $ 6.60\n 8000227 $ 1.12\n 8000228 $ 94.00\n 8000229 $ 467.68\n 8000238 $ 160.00\n 8000239 $ 1.60\n 8000240 $ 80.00\n 8000242 $ 32.00\n 8000245 $ 1.28\n 8000246 $ 20.00\n 8000249 $ 7.20\n 8000250 $ 32.00\n 8000252 $ 2.40\n 8000260 $ 4.32\n 8000262 $ 11,600.80\n 8000265 $ 1,277.12\n 8000266 $ 80.00\n 8000267 $ 204.00\n 8000275 $ 313.60\n 8000276 $ 3.84\n 8000279 $ 30.00\n 8000280 $ 16.00\n 8000281 $ 48.00\n 8000286 $ 2.88\n 8000290 $ 70.56\n 8000292 $ 1,156.88\n 8000298 $ 7.04\n 8000302 $ 80.00\n 8000308 $ 800.00\n 8000309 $ 13.12\n 8000310 $ 8.00\n 8000312 $ 80.00\n 8000320 $ 160.00\n 8000323 $ 4.00\n 8000327 $ 1,048.00\n 8000330 $ 32.96\n 8000332 $ 48.00\n 8000334 $ 32.00\n 8000337 $ 925.60\n 8000338 $ 48.00\n 8000340 $ 6.81\n 8000344 $ 1.32\n 8000346 $ 96.00\n 8000348 $ 2.24\n 8000351 $ 0.16\n 8000352 $ 48.00\n 8000359 $ 8.00\n 8000362 $ 8.00\n 8000363 $ 8,000.00\n 8000364 $ 480.00\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 76 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 8000376 $ 231.68\n 8000382 $ 108.80\n 8000383 $ 32.00\n 8000384 $ 480.00\n 8000389 $ 53.44\n 8000393 $ 32.00\n 8000396 $ 31.00\n 8000397 $ 35.20\n 8000402 $ 12.80\n 8000405 $ 10.00\n 8000406 $ 11.04\n 8000410 $ 160.00\n 8000413 $ 0.32\n 8000414 $ 155.20\n 8000418 $ 328.00\n 8000420 $ 0.80\n 8000423 $ 128.00\n 8000424 $ 0.16\n 8000428 $ 119.20\n 8000429 $ 0.16\n 8000431 $ 16.64\n 8000438 $ 24.00\n 8000441 $ 8.00\n 8000448 $ 63.08\n 8000453 $ 9.76\n 8000456 $ 1,440.00\n 8000462 $ 64.00\n 8000466 $ 0.16\n 8000467 $ 662.54\n 8000468 $ 24.00\n 8000471 $ 38.40\n 8000478 $ 48.00\n 8000480 $ 448.00\n 8000483 $ 17.44\n 8000485 $ 32.00\n 8000488 $ 162.56\n 8000489 $ 400.00\n 8000495 $ 32.00\n 8000496 $ 32.00\n 8000497 $ 16.00\n 8000499 $ 30.56\n 8000500 $ 320.00\n 8000502 $ 357.76\n 8000504 $ 160.00\n 8000507 $ 46.72\n 8000508 $ 121.12\n 8000511 $ 9.60\n 8000513 $ 97.92\n 8000515 $ 32.96\n 8000519 $ 8.00\n 8000522 $ 60.00\n 8000523 $ 8.00\n 8000524 $ 7.04\n 8000525 $ 1.60\n 8000527 $ 5,360.00\n 8000528 $ 667.92\n 8000533 $ 30.00\n 8000534 $ 203.84\n 8000536 $ 41.20\n 8000538 $ 0.24\n 8000539 $ 2.40\n 8000549 $ 36.04\n 8000553 $ 320.00\n 8000555 $ 450.40\n 8000556 $ 0.48\n 8000557 $ 96.93\n 8000559 $ 300.00\n 8000561 $ 2,400.00\n 8000562 $ 2,144.00\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 77 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 8000565 $ 540.80\n 8000566 $ 2,400.00\n 8000567 $ 64.00\n 8000574 $ 28.80\n 8000575 $ 0.16\n 8000578 $ 32.00\n 8000579 $ 6.40\n 8000583 $ 24.48\n 8000585 $ 71.20\n 8000590 $ 16.32\n 8000592 $ 55.20\n 8000597 $ 480.00\n 8000604 $ 160.00\n 8000606 $ 976.48\n 8000639 $ 32.00\n 8000653 $ 4,000.00\n 8000656 $ 4,000.00\n 8000658 $ 4,000.00\n 8000659 $ 4,000.00\n 8000660 $ 800.00\n 8000662 $ 1,600.00\n 8000667 $ 4,000.00\n 8000668 $ 92,800.00\n 8000669 $ 240.00\n 8000682 $ 480.00\n 8000683 $ 1.44\n 8000686 $ 2,240.00\n 8000696 $ 1,053.50\n 8000700 $ 266.88\n 8000701 $ 456.00\n 8000704 $ 16.00\n 8000705 $ 1,120.00\n 8000708 $ 965.12\n 8000711 $ 4.32\n 8000716 $ 240.00\n 8000717 $ 9,415.20\n 8000718 $ 48.00\n 8000720 $ 21.92\n 8000721 $ 640.00\n 8000722 $ 27.20\n 8000724 $ 274.40\n 8000727 $ 126.40\n 8000728 $ 800.00\n 8000729 $ 0.96\n 8000730 $ 0.96\n 8000734 $ 1.12\n 8000736 $ 32.00\n 8000737 $ 50.00\n 8000740 $ 30.00\n 8000741 $ 4.00\n 8000742 $ 537.60\n 8000745 $ 128.00\n 8000746 $ 2.40\n 8000748 $ 2,119.20\n 8000749 $ 745.60\n 8000751 $ 3.20\n 8000754 $ 96.00\n 8000759 $ 45.60\n 8000763 $ 81.60\n 8000764 $ 1,432.64\n 8000765 $ 0.09\n 8000766 $ 0.13\n 8000767 $ 0.48\n 8000773 $ 115.84\n 8000774 $ 640.00\n 8000776 $ 4.00\n 8000778 $ 80.00\n 8000780 $ 4.00\n 8000782 $ 861.60\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 78 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 8000783 $ 255.20\n 8000785 $ 1,125.00\n 8000788 $ 482.56\n 8000789 $ 1.60\n 8000791 $ 480.00\n 8000793 $ 83.84\n 8000795 $ 1,407.68\n 8000797 $ 17.76\n 8000798 $ 160.00\n 8000799 $ 9.60\n 8000801 $ 9.60\n 8000805 $ 6.40\n 8000808 $ 9.92\n 8000809 $ 101.92\n 8000816 $ 496.00\n 8000817 $ 20.90\n 8000818 $ 0.16\n 8000821 $ 480.00\n 8000826 $ 8.00\n 8000828 $ 80.00\n 8000829 $ 80.00\n 8000831 $ 775.76\n 8000832 $ 80.00\n 8000834 $ 869.44\n 8000835 $ 859.84\n 8000850 $ 62.08\n 8000853 $ 33.60\n 8000855 $ 160.00\n 8000856 $ 380.00\n 8000858 $ 160.00\n 8000862 $ 800.00\n 8000863 $ 8.80\n 8000865 $ 3.20\n 8000871 $ 49.12\n 8000872 $ 24.00\n 8000873 $ 8.82\n 8000874 $ 8.00\n 8000877 $ 392.80\n 8000878 $ 44.00\n 8000880 $ 16.00\n 8000881 $ 160.00\n 8000883 $ 3,200.00\n 8000884 $ 3.72\n 8000885 $ 0.06\n 8000886 $ 396.80\n 8000888 $ 1.76\n 8000890 $ 880.00\n 8000891 $ 0.64\n 8000892 $ 16.00\n 8000893 $ 0.16\n 8000894 $ 400.00\n 8000895 $ 93.76\n 8000897 $ 160.00\n 8000898 $ 48.00\n 8000899 $ 48.00\n 8000900 $ 176.00\n 8000901 $ 1.92\n 8000902 $ 56.00\n 8000904 $ 631.56\n 8000909 $ 1.60\n 8000914 $ 0.06\n 8000916 $ 12.80\n 8000918 $ 3,937.92\n 8000922 $ 1,200.00\n 8000924 $ 70.00\n 8000925 $ 43.60\n 8000927 $ 170.72\n 8000928 $ 920.00\n 8000929 $ 32.00\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 79 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 8000933 $ 9.12\n 8000935 $ 1,391.20\n 8000936 $ 2,040.09\n 8000937 $ 32.00\n 8000938 $ 160.00\n 8000939 $ 71.56\n 8000941 $ 600.00\n 8000942 $ 4.16\n 8000945 $ 24.00\n 8000947 $ 2,413.88\n 8000950 $ 8.00\n 8000952 $ 6.00\n 8000953 $ 80.00\n 8000954 $ 13.60\n 8000956 $ 1,464.57\n 8000957 $ 0.16\n 8000959 $ 112.00\n 8000966 $ 160.00\n 8000967 $ 152.16\n 8000970 $ 9.92\n 8000973 $ 10,080.00\n 8000976 $ 0.64\n 8000979 $ 0.16\n 8000986 $ 360.00\n 8000987 $ 24.00\n 8000988 $ 4.00\n 8000990 $ 0.09\n 8000991 $ 17.92\n 8000992 $ 68.00\n 8000993 $ 1,600.00\n 8000995 $ 1,600.00\n 8000996 $ 6,000.00\n 8000997 $ 743.84\n 8001000 $ 1.60\n 8001001 $ 338.08\n 8001004 $ 32.00\n 8001005 $ 80.00\n 8001006 $ 1,000.16\n 8001007 $ 6.40\n 8001009 $ 3.20\n 8001010 $ 4,178.52\n 8001011 $ 0.48\n 8001015 $ 28.96\n 8001020 $ 656.00\n 8001041 $ 900.32\n 8001043 $ 0.80\n 8001049 $ 16.00\n 8001060 $ 1.60\n 8001063 $ 5.12\n 8001072 $ 4.00\n 8001075 $ 4.80\n 8001079 $ 9.76\n 8001091 $ 32.64\n 8001095 $ 3.20\n 8001097 $ 2.56\n 8001103 $ 2.40\n 8001104 $ 3.20\n 8001109 $ 9.60\n 8001116 $ 0.16\n 8001118 $ 9.12\n 8001128 $ 1.60\n 8001130 $ 9.60\n 8001135 $ 28.00\n 8001136 $ 6.40\n 8001156 $ 0.96\n 8001164 $ 0.80\n 8001165 $ 1,028.46\n 8001173 $ 140.00\n 8001188 $ 296.00\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 80 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 8001196 $ 1.60\n 8001201 $ 8.48\n 8001202 $ 36.48\n 8001222 $ 0.80\n 8001236 $ 1.60\n 8001246 $ 1.92\n 8001247 $ 18.00\n 8001248 $ 944.80\n 8001259 $ 0.80\n 8001260 $ 14.72\n 8001264 $ 1.60\n 8001280 $ 8.00\n 8001285 $ 16.00\n 8001294 $ 8.32\n 8001301 $ 0.64\n 8001320 $ 0.16\n 8001328 $ 8.64\n 8001333 $ 0.48\n 8001340 $ 37.50\n 8001342 $ 16.00\n 8001344 $ 25.76\n 8001351 $ 0.80\n 8001352 $ 16.00\n 8001353 $ 7.50\n 8001356 $ 8.00\n 8001358 $ 618.60\n 8001364 $ 0.71\n 8001373 $ 0.90\n 8001376 $ 0.50\n 8001378 $ 0.40\n 8001380 $ 9.06\n 8001381 $ 6.00\n 8001388 $ 0.12\n 8001389 $ 31.08\n 8001396 $ 0.36\n 8001399 $ 1.08\n 8001406 $ 4.32\n 8001413 $ 11.46\n 8001415 $ 20.28\n 8001418 $ 60.00\n 8001421 $ 4.80\n 8001422 $ 6.98\n 8001424 $ 0.90\n 8001436 $ 0.60\n 8001440 $ 0.66\n 8001452 $ 100.23\n 8001458 $ 0.60\n 8001459 $ 0.66\n 8001461 $ 0.12\n 8001462 $ 0.12\n 8001463 $ 60.19\n 8001468 $ 0.60\n 8001472 $ 505.17\n 8001478 $ 0.48\n 8001481 $ 1.20\n 8001484 $ 2.94\n 8001489 $ 0.42\n 8001492 $ 0.30\n 8001496 $ 56.57\n 8001498 $ 1.50\n 8001499 $ 13.26\n 8001504 $ 1.20\n 8001508 $ 15.69\n 8001510 $ 0.71\n 8001511 $ 466.62\n 8001512 $ 2.16\n 8001516 $ 0.42\n 8001519 $ 6.00\n 8001526 $ 6.00\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 81 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 8001541 $ 6.56\n 8001559 $ 198.00\n 8001569 $ 8.00\n 8001579 $ 3.20\n 8001587 $ 9.44\n 8001591 $ 6.24\n 8001595 $ 3.20\n 8001599 $ 80.00\n 8001613 $ 196.00\n 8001619 $ 0.32\n 8001624 $ 448.00\n 8001630 $ 1.60\n 8001632 $ 160.00\n 8001634 $ 0.96\n 8001645 $ 8.40\n 8001651 $ 0.16\n 8001664 $ 20.16\n 8001668 $ 38.56\n 8001679 $ 135.76\n 8001694 $ 0.48\n 8001697 $ 80.00\n 8001700 $ 30.72\n 8001712 $ 19.52\n 8001737 $ 0.80\n 8001739 $ 1,374.04\n 8001776 $ 0.16\n 8001780 $ 12.00\n 8001795 $ 6.00\n 8001799 $ 2,040.00\n 8001800 $ 970.88\n 8001808 $ 1.12\n 8001819 $ 2.40\n 8001821 $ 0.80\n 8001842 $ 4.00\n 8001850 $ 64.00\n 8001853 $ 23.04\n 8001855 $ 32.00\n 8001858 $ 16.00\n 8001870 $ 160.00\n 8001893 $ 109.28\n 8001895 $ 3.52\n 8001899 $ 2.40\n 8001910 $ 1,120.00\n 8001944 $ 4.80\n 8001951 $ 169.60\n 8001984 $ 208.96\n 8001987 $ 58.00\n 8001989 $ 1.60\n 8001995 $ 0.16\n 8002005 $ 16.48\n 8002014 $ 16.00\n 8002026 $ 2.72\n 8002036 $ 6.00\n 8002048 $ 24.00\n 8002060 $ 48.00\n 8002062 $ 24.70\n 8002073 $ 4.80\n 8002081 $ 8.00\n 8002082 $ 24.00\n 8002090 $ 5.60\n 8002097 $ 1.60\n 8002100 $ 10.72\n 8002104 $ 3.20\n 8002109 $ 16.00\n 8002110 $ 7.20\n 8002111 $ 20.00\n 8002113 $ 300.00\n 8002115 $ 1.60\n 8002125 $ 18.24\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 82 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 8002128 $ 1.60\n 8002134 $ 710.00\n 8002143 $ 24.00\n 8002151 $ 1.60\n 8002154 $ 2.40\n 8002161 $ 85.28\n 8002162 $ 2.56\n 8002164 $ 1.00\n 8002170 $ 1.28\n 8002176 $ 8.00\n 8002178 $ 0.48\n 8002179 $ 0.80\n 8002197 $ 8.00\n 8002207 $ 127.04\n 8002210 $ 16.00\n 8002213 $ 16.00\n 8002217 $ 0.16\n 8002219 $ 8.00\n 8002226 $ 4.00\n 8002232 $ 88.80\n 8002235 $ 9.92\n 8002237 $ 0.48\n 8002243 $ 21.28\n 8002244 $ 3.20\n 8002250 $ 28.96\n 8002251 $ 0.64\n 8002257 $ 2.72\n 8002275 $ 8.00\n 8002281 $ 0.80\n 8002285 $ 3.20\n 8002290 $ 3.68\n 8002293 $ 0.32\n 8002301 $ 0.16\n 8002310 $ 8.00\n 8002312 $ 3.70\n 8002315 $ 0.80\n 8002329 $ 270.00\n 8002335 $ 240.00\n 8002336 $ 28.00\n 8002348 $ 202.56\n 8002351 $ 1.12\n 8002353 $ 0.16\n 8002360 $ 1,012.64\n 8002362 $ 48.16\n 8002363 $ 1.60\n 8002369 $ 16.00\n 8002372 $ 202.40\n 8002375 $ 0.16\n 8002380 $ 1,313.41\n 8002386 $ 2,664.00\n 8002391 $ 19.04\n 8002392 $ 9.60\n 8002393 $ 11.20\n 8002395 $ 26.24\n 8002396 $ 112.00\n 8002399 $ 160.00\n 8002402 $ 0.16\n 8002405 $ 38.40\n 8002408 $ 35.20\n 8002413 $ 4.00\n 8002414 $ 30.00\n 8002416 $ 100.00\n 8002418 $ 197.56\n 8002420 $ 8.00\n 8002430 $ 9.60\n 8002436 $ 0.48\n 8002437 $ 64.00\n 8002448 $ 18.40\n 8002466 $ 16.00\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 83 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 8002474 $ 0.16\n 8002475 $ 61.28\n 8002476 $ 5,157.12\n 8002483 $ 118.40\n 8002487 $ 80.00\n 8002489 $ 2.40\n 8002497 $ 1.60\n 8002498 $ 1,634.24\n 8002502 $ 3.00\n 8002504 $ 334.72\n 8002505 $ 17.12\n 8002509 $ 15,799.00\n 8002511 $ 240.00\n 8002519 $ 23.20\n 8002521 $ 0.32\n 8002522 $ 3.84\n 8002523 $ 960.00\n 8002524 $ 8.76\n 8002525 $ 52.00\n 8002531 $ 8.16\n 8002539 $ 16.00\n 8002542 $ 160.00\n 8002543 $ 1.60\n 8002546 $ 112.00\n 8002547 $ 48.00\n 8002550 $ 298.90\n 8002551 $ 17,600.00\n 8002554 $ 258.00\n 8002564 $ 208.00\n 8002565 $ 35.76\n 8002566 $ 160.00\n 8002569 $ 23.84\n 8002575 $ 327.20\n 8002576 $ 31.20\n 8002578 $ 16.00\n 8002580 $ 480.00\n 8002585 $ 60.32\n 8002592 $ 2.24\n 8002598 $ 3.00\n 8002601 $ 80.00\n 8002604 $ 0.72\n 8002612 $ 0.48\n 8002619 $ 4.32\n 8002622 $ 80.00\n 8002624 $ 1,000.00\n 8002625 $ 592.00\n 8002631 $ 160.00\n 8002633 $ 3.20\n 8002639 $ 5,306.16\n 8002640 $ 184.00\n 8002641 $ 0.50\n 8002642 $ 8.00\n 8002644 $ 416.00\n 8002650 $ 15.52\n 8002651 $ 80.00\n 8002653 $ 800.00\n 8002662 $ 16.00\n 8002663 $ 2.56\n 8002665 $ 96.00\n 8002670 $ 96.00\n 8002672 $ 0.40\n 8002675 $ 16.00\n 8002678 $ 11.20\n 8002685 $ 96.00\n 8002696 $ 32.00\n 8002699 $ 272.00\n 8002703 $ 47.84\n 8002704 $ 160.00\n 8002705 $ 80.00\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 84 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 8002708 $ 24.00\n 8002709 $ 1,278.08\n 8002714 $ 1.92\n 8002717 $ 12,362.72\n 8002718 $ 10.08\n 8002719 $ 146.40\n 8002725 $ 409.44\n 8002726 $ 400.00\n 8002728 $ 38.40\n 8002730 $ 16.00\n 8002731 $ 1,600.00\n 8002732 $ 16.00\n 8002733 $ 47.44\n 8002734 $ 8,800.00\n 8002735 $ 42.88\n 8002736 $ 23.20\n 8002738 $ 1.60\n 8002740 $ 65.00\n 8002742 $ 16.00\n 8002746 $ 167.04\n 8002748 $ 20.96\n 8002750 $ 48.00\n 8002752 $ 4,248.00\n 8002755 $ 9.60\n 8002756 $ 13.00\n 8002758 $ 160.00\n 8002761 $ 464.00\n 8002762 $ 220.00\n 8002765 $ 166.50\n 8002766 $ 3.28\n 8002768 $ 1,600.00\n 8002770 $ 13.60\n 8002772 $ 16.00\n 8002775 $ 16.00\n 8002776 $ 268.00\n 8002778 $ 160.00\n 8002779 $ 400.00\n 8002780 $ 0.16\n 8002782 $ 335.36\n 8002784 $ 737.12\n 8002787 $ 80.00\n 8002789 $ 0.16\n 8002791 $ 6.40\n 8002792 $ 80.00\n 8002793 $ 0.64\n 8002796 $ 800.00\n 8002798 $ 24.48\n 8002800 $ 0.80\n 8002802 $ 3,760.00\n 8002803 $ 52.80\n 8002804 $ 44.72\n 8002806 $ 1.28\n 8002811 $ 1,598.56\n 8002812 $ 1,600.00\n 8002813 $ 136.32\n 8002814 $ 800.00\n 8002815 $ 6.60\n 8002816 $ 7.84\n 8002818 $ 320.00\n 8002819 $ 64.00\n 8002820 $ 75.68\n 8002821 $ 12.00\n 8002825 $ 160.00\n 8002826 $ 47.72\n 8002828 $ 320.00\n 8002829 $ 112.56\n 8002831 $ 1.60\n 8002835 $ 800.00\n 8002836 $ 136.00\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 85 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 8002837 $ 800.00\n 8002839 $ 16.00\n 8002840 $ 4.00\n 8002841 $ 52.00\n 8002842 $ 20.48\n 8002846 $ 64.00\n 8002847 $ 16.16\n 8002850 $ 1.76\n 8002851 $ 19.52\n 8002852 $ 0.80\n 8002853 $ 24.00\n 8002854 $ 631.36\n 8002855 $ 48.00\n 8002858 $ 0.16\n 8002859 $ 176.80\n 8002861 $ 160.00\n 8002863 $ 144.00\n 8002865 $ 1,200.00\n 8002866 $ 95.10\n 8002868 $ 7.20\n 8002869 $ 8.00\n 8002871 $ 70.00\n 8002872 $ 6.00\n 8002873 $ 3,200.00\n 8002874 $ 32.00\n 8002875 $ 0.06\n 8002877 $ 148.96\n 8002879 $ 800.00\n 8002880 $ 4,000.00\n 8002881 $ 444.32\n 8002883 $ 13,360.00\n 8002884 $ 41.28\n 8002885 $ 400.00\n 8002887 $ 128.00\n 8002888 $ 12.96\n 8002890 $ 8.00\n 8002891 $ 53.28\n 8002892 $ 160.00\n 8002895 $ 944.00\n 8002896 $ 320.00\n 8002898 $ 615.06\n 8002899 $ 1.28\n 8002901 $ 549.12\n 8002902 $ 2,720.00\n 8002903 $ 2,216.32\n 8002904 $ 71.04\n 8002905 $ 9.28\n 8002906 $ 3.20\n 8002907 $ 48.00\n 8002908 $ 80.00\n 8002910 $ 32.00\n 8002911 $ 1.60\n 8002915 $ 7.74\n 8002916 $ 19.41\n 8002921 $ 5,641.76\n 8002924 $ 21.28\n 8002926 $ 47.36\n 8002927 $ 1.20\n 8002928 $ 2.72\n 8002930 $ 21.92\n 8002932 $ 2,971.04\n 8002933 $ 2,413.60\n 8002934 $ 59.04\n 8002937 $ 2,341.92\n 8002938 $ 35.52\n 8002939 $ 71.68\n 8002941 $ 373.95\n 8002942 $ 151.14\n 8002944 $ 344.41\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 86 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 8002949 $ 2,037.44\n 8002951 $ 576.00\n 8002952 $ 1,773.28\n 8002953 $ 84.00\n 8002954 $ 73.12\n 8002959 $ 74,145.15\n 8002963 $ 82,988.96\n 8002965 $ 14.08\n 8002966 $ 1,159.44\n 8002967 $ 5,744.78\n 8002968 $ 0.06\n 8002970 $ 41.66\n 8002971 $ 1,068.16\n 8002972 $ 755.67\n 8002973 $ 0.10\n 8002974 $ 10.72\n 8002975 $ 2,162.16\n 8002976 $ 1.80\n 8002978 $ 5.76\n 8002979 $ 0.06\n 8002981 $ 22.22\n 8002982 $ 0.42\n 8002984 $ 7.32\n 8002986 $ 5,772.52\n 8002988 $ 2.24\n 8002990 $ 0.48\n 8002992 $ 255.71\n 8002993 $ 2,416.00\n 8002996 $ 1,808.00\n 8002997 $ 3,311.84\n 8002998 $ 2,256.00\n 8003001 $ 6,218.74\n 8003004 $ 0.32\n 8003009 $ 4.26\n 8003011 $ 0.50\n 8003012 $ 112.00\n 8003014 $ 3.28\n 8003015 $ 0.96\n 8003016 $ 16.80\n 8003020 $ 0.16\n 8003021 $ 278.37\n 8003022 $ 17.66\n 8003023 $ 32.81\n 8003024 $ 9.92\n 8003025 $ 19.04\n 8003026 $ 81.34\n 8003027 $ 0.48\n 8003028 $ 0.16\n 8003030 $ 8.32\n 8003032 $ 200.96\n 8003033 $ 6.24\n 8003034 $ 0.64\n 8003036 $ 0.16\n 8003040 $ 0.48\n 8003041 $ 0.32\n 8003042 $ 84,438.94\n 8003043 $ 28,690.86\n 8003044 $ 55,893.25\n 8003045 $ 596.82\n 8003047 $ 30,696.96\n 8003048 $ 39,875.16\n 8003049 $ 235.20\n 8003050 $ 14,979.84\n 8003051 $ 624.30\n 8003054 $ 15,711.50\n 8003055 $ 4,802.88\n 8003058 $ 1,728.00\n 8003059 $ 1,410.08\n 8003061 $ 922.72\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-2 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 87 of 87\n Exhibit B-1\n Timely Eligible Claims\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 8003062 $ 1,260.96\n 8003063 $ 2,128.80\n 8003064 $ 13,094.56\n 8015636 $ 1,491.40\n 8015637 $ 16,290.00\n 8015638 $ 3,460.60\n 8015639 $ 961.20\n 8015640 $ 3,721.20\n 8015641 $ 1,161.60\n 8015642 $ 2,098.80\n 8015643 $ 1,312.50\n 8015644 $ 712.32\n 8015645 $ 5,000.00\n 8015646 $ 362.08\n 8015647 $ 5,600.00\n 8015648 $ 1,904.11\n 8015649 $ 80.00\n 8015650 $ 1,123.60\n 8015651 $ 800.24\n 8015652 $ 1,680.00\n 8015653 $ 16.00\n 8015654 $ 288.00\n 8015655 $ 39,600.00\n 8015656 $ 7,200.00\n 8015657 $ 31,860.43\n 8015659 $ 96.00\n 8015661 $ 40.00\n 8015663 $ 520.00\n 8015664 $ 2,301.90\n 8015665 $ 158.98\n 8015666 $ 1,520.28\n 8015667 $ 6.88\n 8015669 $ 17,689.60\n 8015670 $ 2,601.60\n 8015671 $ 118.40\n 8015672 $ 220.00\n 8015673 $ 240.00\n 8015674 $ 93.60\n 8015677 $ 160.00\n 8015680 $ 2,000.00\n 8015681 $ 3,920.00\n 8015689 $ 4,000.00\n 8015690 $ 1,280.00\n 8015691 $ 1,298.72\n 8015692 $ 220.00\n 8015693 $ 377.70\n 8015694 $ 13.70\n 8015695 $ 61.50\n 8015696 $ 92.94\n 8015697 $ 1,360.00\n 8015698 $ 5,064.00\n 8147053 $ 37.12\n 8430901 $ 157.38\n\f","ocr_status":1,"date_upload":"2026-07-03T04:30:30.804849-07:00","document_number":"111","attachment_number":2,"pacer_doc_id":"039012465703","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":2,"description":"Exhibit B-1 - Timely Eligible Claims","acms_document_guid":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/483906281/","id":483906281,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/64904094/111/3/wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc/","date_created":"2026-06-24T12:56:13.254404-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-14T22:50:31.156058-07:00","sha1":"c1e08540653e9f3b71e7c706991f1fe27cbb7898","page_count":2,"file_size":670856,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.111.3.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.111.3.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-3 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 1 of 2\n\n\n\n\n EXHIBIT B-2\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-3 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n Exhibit\n pg 2 ofB-2\n 2\n Late But Otherwise Eligible Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS\n 7915078 $ 1,680.00\n 7915506 $ 37.35\n 7915600 $ 32.00\n 7915835 $ 18,999.84\n 7916899 $ 4.00\n 7919819 $ 0.16\n 7920276 $ 48.00\n 7920582 $ 2,232.00\n 7971067 $ 528.00\n 7973267 $ 480.00\n 7973324 $ 350.46\n 7973923 $ 416.00\n 7975060 $ 6,279.17\n 7998791 $ 7,221.90\n 7998793 $ 2,148.50\n 8003760 $ 85,158.56\n 8006916 $ 2,640.00\n 8015701 $ 374.29\n 8015702 $ 3,110.45\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2026-07-03T04:30:47.876027-07:00","document_number":"111","attachment_number":3,"pacer_doc_id":"039012465704","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":2,"description":"Exhibit B-2 - Late But Otherwise Eligible Claims","acms_document_guid":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/483906282/","id":483906282,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/64904094/111/4/wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc/","date_created":"2026-06-24T12:56:13.273894-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-03T04:30:18.955573-07:00","sha1":"e6095dcaabc46572266015a8593c84f71f56cb89","page_count":222,"file_size":467400,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.111.4.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.111.4.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 1 of 222\n\n\n\n\n EXHIBIT B-3\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 2 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7882151 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7900479 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7911302 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7914304 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7914844 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7926031 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7926032 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979151 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979152 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979154 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979155 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979156 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979157 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979165 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979171 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979172 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979173 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979177 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979178 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979182 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979186 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979187 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979189 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979191 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979197 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979198 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979201 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979202 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979203 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979204 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979205 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979206 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979208 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979210 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979211 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979212 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979213 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979214 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979216 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979217 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979219 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979220 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979224 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979226 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979228 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979229 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979230 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979232 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979234 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979235 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979237 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979238 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979242 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979243 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979245 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979250 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979252 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979254 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979256 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979257 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979260 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979262 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979264 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979265 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979266 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979269 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979270 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979271 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979273 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979276 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979278 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979280 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979284 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979286 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979288 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979291 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979292 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979294 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979295 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979298 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979299 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979300 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979302 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 3 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7979309 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979310 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979314 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979316 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979317 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979318 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979319 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979321 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979322 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979323 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979324 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979327 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979328 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979329 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979330 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979331 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979334 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979335 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979336 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979337 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979340 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979342 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979347 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979351 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979356 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979363 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979364 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979366 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979367 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979368 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979369 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979371 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979373 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979374 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979379 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979383 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979384 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979385 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979387 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979389 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979390 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979395 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979397 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979399 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979401 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979403 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979406 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979407 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979408 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979415 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979421 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979422 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979425 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979427 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979428 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979430 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979432 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979433 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979435 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979436 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979437 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979438 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979440 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979441 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979442 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979443 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979445 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979446 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979447 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979450 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979451 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979455 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979457 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979458 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979460 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979463 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979465 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979466 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979468 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979469 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979470 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979473 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979474 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 4 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7979478 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979479 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979480 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979482 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979484 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979489 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979492 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979493 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979494 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979501 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979503 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979505 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979506 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979508 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979509 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979510 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979513 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979514 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979515 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979517 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979518 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979521 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979524 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979525 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979528 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979529 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979530 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979535 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979536 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979541 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979542 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979546 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979547 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979551 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979553 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979554 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979556 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979557 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979558 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979559 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979561 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979564 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979565 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979566 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979567 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979569 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979570 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979571 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979575 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979576 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979578 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979579 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979580 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979582 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979586 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979587 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979590 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979592 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979594 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979596 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979600 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979604 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979610 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979611 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979613 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979615 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979616 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979617 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979619 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979621 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979625 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979627 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979629 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979631 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979632 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979636 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979643 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979644 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979654 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979655 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979657 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979658 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979659 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 5 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7979662 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979663 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979664 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979666 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979668 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979672 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979674 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979676 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979677 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979679 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979682 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979684 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979685 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979687 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979688 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979690 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979691 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979692 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979695 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979697 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979698 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979699 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979702 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979705 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979707 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979709 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979717 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979720 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979721 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979722 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979723 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979726 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979727 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979729 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979730 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979731 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979732 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979734 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979736 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979738 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979740 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979741 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979747 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979749 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979750 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979751 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979754 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979756 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979759 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979761 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979768 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979769 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979771 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979772 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979773 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979774 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979776 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979780 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979782 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979784 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979786 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979788 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979790 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979793 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979797 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979803 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979805 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979806 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979808 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979809 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979810 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979813 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979817 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979819 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979822 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979823 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979827 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979828 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979831 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979833 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979835 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979837 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979842 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 6 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7979843 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979844 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979845 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979847 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979855 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979856 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979857 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979861 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979864 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979865 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979866 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979867 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979868 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979869 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979870 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979875 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979876 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979877 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979878 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979879 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979880 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979881 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979882 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979884 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979885 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979887 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979888 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979889 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979890 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979893 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979894 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979895 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979896 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979898 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979899 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979900 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979904 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979906 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979908 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979910 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979912 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979913 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979917 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979919 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979920 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979922 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979924 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979925 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979926 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979928 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979929 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979930 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979932 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979933 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979934 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979935 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979937 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979939 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979941 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979946 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979947 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979950 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979952 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979953 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979954 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979955 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979957 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979958 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979962 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979965 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979966 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979968 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979969 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979970 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979978 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979979 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979980 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979982 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979983 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979986 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979987 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979988 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979990 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 7 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7979992 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979993 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979996 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979998 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980000 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980001 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980004 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980005 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980006 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980007 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980008 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980010 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980011 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980012 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980015 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980018 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980020 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980021 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980022 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980024 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980025 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980029 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980031 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980033 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980034 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980040 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980042 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980044 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980045 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980046 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980047 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980052 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980053 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980056 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980059 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980060 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980061 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980063 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980067 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980068 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980069 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980070 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980071 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980072 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980073 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980075 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980076 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980082 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980088 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980090 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980091 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980098 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980100 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980102 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980103 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980104 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980106 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980107 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980108 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980109 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980111 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980115 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980116 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980117 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980119 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980120 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980121 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980122 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980123 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980124 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980125 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980129 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980131 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980133 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980134 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980136 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980139 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980140 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980141 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980142 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980144 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980147 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980148 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 8 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7980149 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980150 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980152 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980155 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980159 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980160 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980161 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980162 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980164 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980167 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980168 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980169 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980170 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980172 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980174 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980175 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980176 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980179 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980180 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980183 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980184 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980186 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980187 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980188 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980191 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980192 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980193 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980194 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980195 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980196 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980197 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980199 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980201 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980202 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980203 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980206 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980211 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980213 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980217 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980218 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980221 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980222 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980224 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980226 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980227 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980228 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980229 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980230 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980231 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980233 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980238 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980239 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980241 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980242 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980244 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980248 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980251 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980252 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980253 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980254 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980255 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980256 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980257 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980258 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980259 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980260 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980262 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980263 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980264 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980266 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980268 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980269 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980270 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980271 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980272 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980273 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980274 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980275 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980276 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980277 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980278 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980279 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980282 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 9 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7980292 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980294 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980296 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980298 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980301 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980302 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980303 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980304 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980305 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980306 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980308 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980309 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980311 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980313 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980314 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980316 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980318 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980322 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980324 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980325 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980326 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980328 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980329 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980330 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980331 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980334 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980335 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980337 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980343 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980344 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980346 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980348 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980349 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980352 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980353 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980354 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980356 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980357 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980359 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980361 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980364 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980366 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980367 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980368 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980369 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980370 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980372 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980373 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980374 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980376 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980377 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980378 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980379 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980380 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980381 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980382 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980383 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980384 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980385 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980387 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980388 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980389 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980390 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980391 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980392 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980394 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980398 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980400 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980401 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980402 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980403 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980405 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980406 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980407 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980408 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980409 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980412 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980415 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980417 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980418 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980419 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980420 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980422 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 10 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7980423 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980426 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980427 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980428 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980429 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980434 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980436 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980439 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980441 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980443 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980446 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980451 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980452 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980453 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980454 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980455 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980456 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980460 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980463 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980466 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980473 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980476 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980478 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980481 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980484 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980485 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980487 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980488 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980489 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980491 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980492 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980494 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980495 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980496 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980497 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980498 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980499 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980501 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980503 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980506 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980512 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980515 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980516 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980517 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980518 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980521 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980522 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980526 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980528 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980529 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980533 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980534 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980535 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980536 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980537 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980539 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980541 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980542 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980544 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980546 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980549 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980550 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980557 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980558 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980561 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980562 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980563 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980567 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980568 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980569 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980571 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980577 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980582 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980586 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980587 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980589 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980590 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980593 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980595 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980596 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980599 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980600 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980601 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 11 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7980602 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980603 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980604 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980605 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980607 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980608 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980612 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980613 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980614 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980615 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980617 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980618 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980619 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980624 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980625 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980626 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980628 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980632 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980634 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980637 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980638 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980642 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980643 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980646 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980648 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980649 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980650 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980653 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980656 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980657 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980660 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980662 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980670 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980673 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980674 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980679 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980680 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980682 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980684 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980685 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980687 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980688 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980691 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980692 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980693 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980696 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980697 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980701 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980702 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980704 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980707 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980710 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980712 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980717 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980719 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980724 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980725 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980726 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980727 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980733 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980737 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980738 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980740 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980741 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980742 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980744 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980746 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980748 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980749 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980753 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980754 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980755 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980758 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980759 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980770 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980772 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980773 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980775 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980776 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980778 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980781 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980783 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980784 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 12 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7980789 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980794 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980811 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980815 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980823 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980828 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980843 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980844 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980848 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980852 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980853 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980854 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980855 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980856 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980881 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980882 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980885 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980890 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980930 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980931 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980932 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980938 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980939 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980949 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980951 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980953 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980960 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980962 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980992 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980996 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981021 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981027 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981062 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981068 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981088 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981117 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981141 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981153 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981154 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981165 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981223 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981224 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981324 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981326 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981327 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981328 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981330 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981332 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981341 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981342 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981343 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981344 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981346 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981351 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981354 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981355 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981359 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981362 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981367 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981369 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981371 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981372 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981374 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981377 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981382 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981383 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981384 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981385 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981387 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981388 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981390 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981394 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981395 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981396 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981398 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981400 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981402 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981403 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981404 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981405 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981406 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981410 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981411 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 13 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7981412 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981414 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981415 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981417 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981418 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981420 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981422 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981423 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981424 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981425 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981428 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981431 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981432 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981433 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981434 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981437 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981441 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981447 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981448 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981449 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981450 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981452 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981453 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981455 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981458 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981459 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981462 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981464 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981466 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981469 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981471 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981473 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981476 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981478 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981479 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981488 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981489 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981491 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981492 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981493 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981494 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981499 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981505 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981509 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981510 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981512 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981514 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981516 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981518 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981519 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981524 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981525 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981527 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981528 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981530 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981531 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981533 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981534 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981538 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981542 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981543 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981544 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981546 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981547 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981548 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981549 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981551 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981556 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981562 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981564 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981566 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981567 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981568 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981570 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981571 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981572 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981573 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981575 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981576 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981578 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981581 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981583 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981584 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 14 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7981585 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981586 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981587 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981590 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981592 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981593 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981596 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981597 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981598 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981602 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981604 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981607 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981608 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981609 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981611 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981614 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981615 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981618 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981620 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981622 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981624 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981626 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981627 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981628 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981629 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981630 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981634 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981635 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981636 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981639 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981640 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981641 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981642 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981643 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981650 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981651 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981652 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981657 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981658 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981661 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981662 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981663 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981666 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981667 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981670 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981671 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981672 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981673 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981678 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981680 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981681 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981682 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981683 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981684 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981686 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981687 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981689 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981690 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981691 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981692 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981693 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981702 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981703 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981706 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981710 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981712 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981713 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981714 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981718 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981720 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981722 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981723 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981726 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981733 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981734 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981735 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981736 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981738 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981742 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981744 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981750 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981752 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981753 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 15 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7981756 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981763 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981764 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981769 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981771 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981772 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981773 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981778 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981781 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981783 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981786 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981787 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981789 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981791 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981793 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981794 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981795 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981801 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981803 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981805 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981806 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981809 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981811 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981813 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981818 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981823 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981831 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981832 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981837 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981838 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981840 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981842 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981843 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981846 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981848 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981850 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981851 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981852 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981854 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981857 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981859 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981861 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981862 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981863 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981867 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981870 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981871 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981874 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981875 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981876 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981879 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981882 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981884 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981886 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981887 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981889 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981890 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981893 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981896 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981898 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981901 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981903 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981906 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981907 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981908 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981910 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981912 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981913 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981916 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981918 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981923 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981925 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981926 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981936 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981938 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981942 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981943 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981944 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981945 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981949 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981950 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981952 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981955 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 16 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7981956 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981957 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981960 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981961 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981965 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981967 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981968 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981970 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981972 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981974 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981975 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981977 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981978 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981979 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981981 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981983 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981985 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981986 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981987 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981988 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981989 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981991 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981999 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982001 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982002 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982004 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982005 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982012 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982015 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982016 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982018 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982019 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982020 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982021 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982023 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982027 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982028 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982029 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982033 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982035 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982036 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982037 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982040 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982041 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982042 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982043 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982044 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982047 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982048 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982049 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982050 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982052 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982053 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982054 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982055 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982057 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982060 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982062 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982063 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982064 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982068 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982069 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982070 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982073 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982075 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982078 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982082 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982083 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982087 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982088 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982090 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982093 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982094 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982095 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982096 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982097 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982099 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982100 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982101 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982102 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982104 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982106 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982109 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 17 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7982113 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982114 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982118 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982119 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982122 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982123 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982125 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982126 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982129 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982130 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982134 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982136 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982137 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982139 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982142 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982143 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982144 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982145 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982148 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982149 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982150 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982151 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982153 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982155 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982157 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982158 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982159 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982161 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982162 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982163 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982166 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982168 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982169 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982170 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982173 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982174 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982176 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982177 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982179 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982180 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982181 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982183 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982186 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982187 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982188 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982190 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982193 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982194 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982197 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982200 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982201 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982207 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982208 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982209 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982213 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982217 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982223 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982226 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982227 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982229 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982230 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982231 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982234 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982237 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982240 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982241 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982243 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982244 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982245 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982246 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982248 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982249 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982250 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982254 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982255 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982259 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982260 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982261 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982262 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982263 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982265 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982266 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982267 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 18 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7982277 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982278 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982279 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982280 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982283 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982285 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982287 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982289 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982290 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982294 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982295 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982297 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982298 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982301 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982302 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982303 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982306 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982308 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982310 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982311 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982312 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982315 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982316 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982317 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982319 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982320 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982321 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982322 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982324 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982325 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982326 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982328 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982329 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982330 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982332 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982333 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982334 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982338 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982341 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982344 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982345 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982346 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982347 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982348 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982349 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982351 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982352 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982353 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982356 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982357 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982358 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982360 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982362 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982365 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982366 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982367 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982368 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982369 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982370 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982372 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982374 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982375 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982377 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982378 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982379 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982381 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982382 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982383 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982384 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982385 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982386 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982387 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982390 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982392 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982398 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982400 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982403 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982406 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982407 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982408 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982409 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982410 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982412 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 19 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7982416 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982419 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982420 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982421 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982422 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982427 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982429 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982431 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982435 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982436 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982438 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982441 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982443 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982445 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982446 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982448 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982449 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982450 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982451 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982452 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982456 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982457 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982459 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982460 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982462 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982464 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982471 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982472 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982475 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982476 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982479 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982480 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982481 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982482 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982483 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982486 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982488 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982489 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982493 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982494 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982495 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982497 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982505 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982506 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982507 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982509 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982512 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982513 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982515 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982516 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982518 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982519 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982524 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982526 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982530 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982532 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982534 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982535 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982537 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982539 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982542 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982546 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982549 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982550 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982551 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982552 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982553 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982556 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982557 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982558 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982559 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982561 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982562 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982568 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982571 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982572 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982573 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982574 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982575 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982576 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982577 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982579 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982581 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 20 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7982583 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982584 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982585 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982586 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982589 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982590 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982593 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982594 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982598 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982599 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982600 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982602 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982605 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982608 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982609 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982610 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982611 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982613 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982616 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982617 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982618 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982619 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982621 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982622 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982624 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982625 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982639 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982640 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982642 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982643 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982644 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982645 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982647 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982648 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982649 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982652 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982653 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982654 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982655 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982660 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982662 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982665 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982670 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982671 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982674 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982675 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982676 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982677 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982679 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982680 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982681 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982682 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982683 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982685 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982690 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982695 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982697 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982698 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982702 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982703 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982705 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982715 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982718 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982719 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982724 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982725 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982727 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982728 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982729 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982733 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982735 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982736 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982737 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982741 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982744 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982745 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982746 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982749 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982751 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982752 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982753 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982755 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982760 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 21 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7982761 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982763 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982765 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982767 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982770 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982771 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982772 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982774 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982775 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982777 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982784 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982786 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982787 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982789 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982791 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982793 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982795 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982798 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982800 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982803 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982804 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982805 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982807 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982808 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982810 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982811 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982813 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982814 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982815 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982819 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982820 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982821 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982822 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982823 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982828 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982830 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982831 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982832 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982833 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982835 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982836 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982837 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982838 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982839 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982841 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982844 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982846 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982848 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982850 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982852 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982855 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982862 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982863 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982865 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982866 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982868 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982870 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982871 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982872 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982875 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982878 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982881 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982883 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982887 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982888 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982889 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982893 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982896 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982897 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982901 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982903 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982905 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982906 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982907 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982908 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982910 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982919 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982922 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982925 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982926 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982929 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982932 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982934 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 22 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7982938 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982939 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982944 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982945 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982947 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982948 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982949 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982951 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982954 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982956 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982957 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982958 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982959 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982960 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982961 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982968 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982969 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982971 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982974 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982986 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982988 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982993 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983016 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983021 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983022 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983025 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983026 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983027 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983035 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983048 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983054 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983056 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983058 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983063 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983064 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983072 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983080 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983098 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983099 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983112 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983132 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983136 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983149 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983172 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983175 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983176 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983181 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983185 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983186 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983193 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983198 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983199 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983201 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983202 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983203 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983204 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983206 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983210 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983215 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983217 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983226 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983231 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983233 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983234 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983235 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983239 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983243 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983244 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983247 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983248 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983249 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983250 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983252 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983254 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983258 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983261 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983263 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983267 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983269 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983271 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983273 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983276 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983281 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 23 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7983283 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983284 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983288 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983289 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983290 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983291 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983293 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983297 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983301 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983302 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983303 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983308 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983310 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983313 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983314 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983315 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983316 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983321 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983326 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983333 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983334 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983335 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983337 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983338 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983340 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983341 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983342 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983346 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983350 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983352 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983353 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983354 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983355 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983356 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983357 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983358 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983359 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983364 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983367 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983368 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983369 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983372 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983373 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983377 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983378 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983379 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983381 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983382 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983383 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983386 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983388 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983389 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983392 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983397 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983399 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983400 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983401 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983402 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983404 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983405 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983406 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983407 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983409 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983410 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983412 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983418 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983423 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983426 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983429 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983430 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983432 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983434 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983436 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983437 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983439 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983440 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983442 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983445 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983446 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983447 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983451 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983455 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983458 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 24 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7983459 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983463 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983465 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983466 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983469 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983470 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983475 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983476 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983477 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983481 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983485 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983488 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983489 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983491 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983495 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983501 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983503 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983512 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983513 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983514 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983516 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983517 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983518 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983521 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983523 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983528 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983529 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983534 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983536 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983538 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983540 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983541 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983543 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983544 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983545 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983546 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983551 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983553 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983556 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983560 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983562 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983565 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983566 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983567 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983569 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983570 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983571 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983573 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983580 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983581 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983582 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983585 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983586 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983588 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983589 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983591 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983592 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983603 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983604 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983607 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983608 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983610 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983611 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983614 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983617 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983618 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983620 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983622 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983623 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983626 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983629 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983630 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983631 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983637 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983642 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983643 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983644 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983645 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983647 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983649 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983651 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983652 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983655 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 25 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7983657 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983658 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983659 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983660 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983665 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983667 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983669 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983670 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983671 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983672 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983673 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983674 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983675 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983676 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983677 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983678 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983679 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983682 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983684 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983686 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983687 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983690 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983691 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983692 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983694 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983695 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983699 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983700 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983702 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983703 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983705 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983706 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983711 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983714 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983717 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983718 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983720 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983721 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983727 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983728 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983731 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983735 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983741 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983744 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983746 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983747 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983748 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983749 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983750 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983752 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983753 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983754 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983755 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983758 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983759 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983760 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983763 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983769 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983775 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983776 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983777 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983778 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983785 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983786 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983788 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983791 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983792 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983794 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983795 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983799 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983802 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983806 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983811 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983813 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983817 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983819 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983824 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983826 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983829 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983830 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983833 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983834 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983841 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 26 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7983842 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983843 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983844 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983846 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983847 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983850 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983851 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983852 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983854 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983858 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983859 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983860 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983863 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983864 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983868 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983869 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983870 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983871 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983873 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983876 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983879 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983881 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983883 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983892 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983893 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983896 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983898 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983900 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983901 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983902 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983904 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983906 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983907 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983908 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983909 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983910 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983912 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983914 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983915 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983917 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983919 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983922 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983923 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983926 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983928 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983930 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983935 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983936 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983937 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983938 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983940 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983941 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983942 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983943 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983944 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983945 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983947 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983948 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983952 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983953 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983955 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983956 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983963 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983966 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983967 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983968 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983969 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983974 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983978 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983981 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983986 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983987 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983988 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983991 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983995 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983996 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983997 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983998 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984000 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984001 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984002 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984004 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984005 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 27 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7984008 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984009 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984010 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984011 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984012 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984014 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984015 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984016 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984017 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984018 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984023 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984024 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984025 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984028 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984029 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984030 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984032 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984034 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984036 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984038 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984041 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984042 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984048 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984050 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984051 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984054 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984055 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984061 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984066 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984067 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984069 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984070 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984074 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984076 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984081 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984082 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984083 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984084 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984087 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984089 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984091 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984092 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984093 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984096 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984098 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984099 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984100 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984101 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984104 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984105 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984106 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984107 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984108 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984110 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984111 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984116 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984118 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984119 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984123 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984124 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984129 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984130 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984133 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984135 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984140 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984141 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984144 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984145 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984146 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984148 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984150 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984151 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984153 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984160 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984162 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984163 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984167 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984168 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984169 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984170 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984171 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984173 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984176 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 28 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7984177 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984178 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984179 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984183 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984185 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984186 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984187 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984189 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984190 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984191 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984192 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984195 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984199 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984208 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984210 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984213 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984215 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984216 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984222 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984223 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984228 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984229 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984230 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984231 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984232 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984236 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984239 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984240 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984241 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984244 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984245 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984246 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984249 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984250 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984251 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984252 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984253 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984254 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984258 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984260 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984261 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984263 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984299 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984385 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984386 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984387 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984391 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984395 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984401 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984409 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984413 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984414 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984415 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984417 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984421 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984427 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984428 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984432 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984434 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984438 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984439 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984442 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984447 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984449 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984453 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984454 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984456 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984457 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984459 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984461 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984466 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984469 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984470 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984473 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984481 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984482 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984485 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984489 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984491 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984495 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984497 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984498 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984499 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 29 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7984502 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984504 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984505 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984510 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984511 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984517 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984518 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984520 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984523 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984527 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984532 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984533 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984536 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984537 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984542 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984546 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984547 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984550 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984551 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984554 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984556 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984558 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984560 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984562 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984568 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984569 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984572 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984582 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984587 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984588 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984596 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984597 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984599 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984600 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984601 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984602 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984604 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984605 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984607 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984612 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984613 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984619 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984621 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984623 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984624 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984626 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984627 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984628 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984629 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984630 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984631 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984632 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984634 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984635 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984636 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984640 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984644 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984648 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984649 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984650 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984651 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984653 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984655 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984656 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984659 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984661 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984663 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984665 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984669 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984672 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984673 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984674 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984675 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984676 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984678 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984679 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984680 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984681 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984682 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984684 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984685 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984687 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984690 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 30 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7984692 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984693 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984695 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984697 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984700 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984701 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984702 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984703 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984704 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984705 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984706 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984708 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984709 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984710 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984715 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984717 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984718 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984719 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984720 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984721 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984726 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984727 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984730 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984732 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984733 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984734 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984737 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984738 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984740 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984742 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984743 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984755 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984757 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984759 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984763 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984765 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984767 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984768 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984769 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984770 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984774 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984779 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984781 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984783 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984784 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984786 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984787 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984789 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984790 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984792 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984794 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984795 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984796 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984799 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984800 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984805 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984806 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984807 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984810 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984812 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984820 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984822 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984827 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984828 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984829 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984830 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984833 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984834 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984835 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984836 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984837 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984840 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984842 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984843 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984845 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984847 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984849 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984852 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984853 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984859 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984863 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984864 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984869 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 31 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7984872 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984873 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984876 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984878 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984881 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984883 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984887 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984890 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984891 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984893 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984894 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984895 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984896 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984900 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984902 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984903 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984904 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984907 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984909 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984911 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984913 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984914 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984916 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984921 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984922 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984923 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984924 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984926 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984929 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984930 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984932 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984934 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984937 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984939 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984944 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984947 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984948 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984950 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984953 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984955 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984958 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984964 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984969 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984974 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984981 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984984 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984985 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984990 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984991 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7984992 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985002 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985005 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985009 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985011 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985015 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985016 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985020 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985023 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985026 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985029 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985030 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985033 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985035 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985038 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985039 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985048 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985052 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985056 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985063 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985064 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985065 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985079 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985081 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985085 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985088 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985089 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985095 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985098 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985099 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985106 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985111 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985117 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985119 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 32 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7985121 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985123 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985125 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985126 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985127 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985128 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985129 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985132 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985133 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985134 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985141 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985144 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985145 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985146 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985151 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985154 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985156 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985157 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985160 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985162 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985163 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985165 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985166 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985169 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985170 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985174 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985176 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985179 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985180 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985181 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985183 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985185 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985186 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985188 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985189 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985190 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985191 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985192 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985193 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985194 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985195 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985197 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985199 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985201 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985203 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985206 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985208 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985210 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985211 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985214 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985219 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985225 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985228 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985233 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985238 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985246 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985247 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985250 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985253 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985256 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985257 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985260 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985262 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985265 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985266 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985269 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985273 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985277 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985280 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985282 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985283 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985286 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985287 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985288 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985289 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985290 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985291 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985292 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985293 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985294 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985295 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985296 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985298 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 33 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7985300 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985305 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985309 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985311 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985312 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985313 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985314 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985315 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985316 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985317 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985320 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985321 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985322 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985324 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985326 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985327 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985328 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985329 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985334 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985335 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985336 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985340 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985342 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985343 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985344 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985345 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985347 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985352 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985353 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985354 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985355 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985357 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985358 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985359 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985362 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985368 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985371 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985373 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985374 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985376 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985380 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985385 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985386 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985387 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985391 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985393 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985395 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985397 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985403 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985406 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985412 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985414 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985415 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985418 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985419 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985420 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985422 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985423 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985426 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985430 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985431 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985432 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985433 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985434 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985436 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985441 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985442 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985443 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985444 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985446 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985447 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985449 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985451 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985452 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985454 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985455 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985456 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985457 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985458 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985461 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985464 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985465 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985468 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 34 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7985469 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985470 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985473 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985474 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985475 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985476 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985477 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985479 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985480 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985484 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985486 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985491 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985492 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985495 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985496 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985501 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985502 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985505 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985507 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985509 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985511 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985512 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985514 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985515 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985518 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985520 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985524 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985527 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985528 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985529 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985530 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985531 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985539 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985540 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985543 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985548 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985550 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985553 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985559 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985560 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985562 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985566 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985567 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985568 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985569 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985570 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985571 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985578 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985579 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985581 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985583 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985585 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985588 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985589 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985590 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985591 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985592 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985593 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985594 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985595 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985596 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985601 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985602 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985603 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985605 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985606 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985609 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985610 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985613 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985616 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985618 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985619 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985622 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985623 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985624 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985625 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985628 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985631 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985632 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985633 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985636 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985637 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985639 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 35 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7985648 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985649 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985650 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985652 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985655 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985657 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985658 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985660 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985663 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985667 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985668 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985672 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985675 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985676 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985677 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985678 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985679 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985681 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985683 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985684 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985688 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985689 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985691 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985693 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985698 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985701 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985702 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985703 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985707 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985711 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985714 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985715 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985716 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985721 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985726 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985727 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985729 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985730 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985731 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985732 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985733 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985734 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985737 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985738 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985739 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985740 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985741 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985743 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985745 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985749 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985753 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985756 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985759 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985761 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985764 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985769 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985770 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985771 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985773 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985775 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985776 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985779 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985781 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985782 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985783 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985786 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985787 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985790 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985794 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985796 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985798 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985799 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985800 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985801 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985806 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985810 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985824 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985826 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985828 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985829 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985831 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985835 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985836 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 36 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7985837 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985840 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985843 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985845 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985855 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985858 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985859 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985861 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985863 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985864 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985865 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985866 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985867 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985870 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985871 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985872 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985874 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985876 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985882 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985885 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985886 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985887 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985888 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985893 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985897 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985899 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985901 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985904 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985905 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985906 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985907 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985908 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985910 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985916 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985919 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985920 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985921 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985922 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985923 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985924 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985925 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985926 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985929 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985930 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985931 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985932 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985933 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985934 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985935 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985936 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985937 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985941 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985942 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985944 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985945 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985946 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985951 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985953 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985954 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985955 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985957 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985959 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985967 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985969 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985971 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985973 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985975 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985982 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985984 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985986 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985987 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985989 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985990 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985992 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985993 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985994 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985996 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985997 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985999 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986001 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986002 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986003 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986005 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 37 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7986007 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986008 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986009 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986010 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986012 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986017 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986018 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986019 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986024 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986025 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986027 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986028 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986033 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986034 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986035 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986039 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986040 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986041 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986043 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986046 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986047 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986048 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986049 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986050 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986054 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986055 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986056 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986057 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986063 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986065 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986066 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986072 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986073 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986076 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986081 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986082 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986083 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986085 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986088 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986089 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986094 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986102 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986103 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986105 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986107 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986110 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986111 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986114 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986116 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986117 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986118 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986121 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986122 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986123 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986124 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986128 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986130 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986134 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986136 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986137 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986139 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986141 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986142 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986145 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986146 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986147 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986148 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986149 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986152 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986154 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986155 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986157 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986158 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986159 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986160 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986161 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986162 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986168 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986169 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986171 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986172 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986176 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986177 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 38 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7986179 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986180 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986185 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986190 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986194 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986198 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986200 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986202 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986204 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986206 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986209 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986211 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986219 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986226 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986227 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986228 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986238 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986241 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986243 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986244 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986245 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986251 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986254 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986255 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986257 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986272 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986274 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986275 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986279 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986281 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986283 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986287 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986288 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986289 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986291 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986293 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986294 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986296 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986298 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986299 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986300 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986301 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986302 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986303 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986305 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986306 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986307 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986308 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986310 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986313 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986320 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986322 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986323 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986324 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986326 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986328 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986329 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986330 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986334 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986337 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986338 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986340 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986341 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986342 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986343 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986344 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986345 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986347 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986349 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986350 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986351 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986353 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986358 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986359 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986360 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986363 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986364 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986366 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986368 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986369 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986370 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986371 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986373 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 39 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7986375 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986376 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986383 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986386 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986387 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986390 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986394 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986395 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986398 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986400 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986402 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986403 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986405 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986406 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986407 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986410 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986411 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986413 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986415 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986419 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986420 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986422 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986424 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986426 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986427 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986431 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986432 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986434 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986435 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986437 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986443 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986444 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986445 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986446 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986447 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986448 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986449 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986450 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986456 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986458 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986462 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986463 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986464 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986465 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986467 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986468 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986471 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986473 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986476 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986477 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986480 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986486 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986488 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986491 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986492 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986493 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986494 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986495 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986496 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986497 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986499 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986501 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986502 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986504 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986505 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986508 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986509 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986510 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986511 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986512 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986513 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986514 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986516 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986520 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986521 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986522 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986523 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986524 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986525 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986527 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986528 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986529 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986531 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 40 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7986532 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986533 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986534 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986537 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986539 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986540 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986541 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986544 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986545 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986548 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986549 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986553 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986554 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986555 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986556 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986557 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986558 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986560 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986562 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986569 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986576 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986579 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986581 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986583 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986587 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986591 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986593 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986596 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986597 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986599 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986600 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986601 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986604 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986605 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986606 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986609 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986611 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986612 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986613 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986615 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986617 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986619 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986623 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986625 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986627 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986629 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986631 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986632 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986633 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986635 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986637 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986638 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986641 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986642 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986644 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986645 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986646 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986649 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986651 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986652 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986653 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986654 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986655 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986658 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986659 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986660 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986661 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986662 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986666 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986669 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986670 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986671 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986673 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986678 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986682 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986684 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986687 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986689 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986690 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986694 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986695 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986698 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986699 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 41 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7986701 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986703 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986707 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986708 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986709 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986712 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986714 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986715 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986716 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986719 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986720 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986723 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986726 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986729 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986733 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986734 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986737 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986738 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986739 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986740 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986749 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986750 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986751 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986754 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986755 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986757 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986759 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986760 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986762 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986764 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986767 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986769 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986771 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986774 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986775 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986777 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986778 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986781 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986782 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986785 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986786 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986790 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986791 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986794 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986799 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986800 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986801 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986802 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986805 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986806 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986808 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986809 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986811 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986812 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986814 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986815 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986818 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986820 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986821 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986823 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986825 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986828 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986833 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986836 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986837 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986838 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986840 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986841 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986842 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986844 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986845 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986846 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986849 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986850 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986851 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986855 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986857 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986858 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986860 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986862 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986863 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986864 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986865 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 42 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7986866 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986867 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986868 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986869 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986870 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986871 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986872 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986873 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986874 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986875 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986876 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986877 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986878 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986880 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986881 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986882 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986883 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986886 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986887 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986888 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986889 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986891 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986892 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986894 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986895 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986896 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986897 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986898 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986900 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986902 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986905 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986906 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986907 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986909 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986910 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986913 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986916 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986917 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986922 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986925 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986927 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986928 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986930 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986931 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986932 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986934 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986937 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986939 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986940 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986941 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986943 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986947 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986948 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986954 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986957 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986959 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986961 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986979 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986981 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986984 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986994 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986995 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987007 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987008 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987010 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987015 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987016 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987019 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987022 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987026 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987028 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987030 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987033 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987037 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987038 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987039 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987041 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987042 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987043 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987044 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987045 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987046 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987052 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 43 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7987054 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987056 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987057 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987058 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987060 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987064 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987065 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987066 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987067 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987071 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987072 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987073 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987074 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987077 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987078 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987079 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987080 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987081 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987082 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987083 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987085 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987086 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987087 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987090 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987091 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987093 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987094 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987095 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987096 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987099 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987104 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987105 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987106 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987108 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987109 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987112 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987114 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987116 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987118 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987120 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987123 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987124 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987125 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987127 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987128 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987130 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987132 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987135 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987136 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987138 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987139 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987141 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987143 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987144 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987148 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987149 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987151 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987153 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987154 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987156 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987162 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987163 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987164 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987166 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987167 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987168 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987173 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987176 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987179 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987180 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987182 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987186 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987188 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987189 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987192 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987196 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987198 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987200 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987201 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987203 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987204 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987208 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987211 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 44 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7987212 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987216 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987217 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987219 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987221 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987222 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987223 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987224 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987225 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987227 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987229 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987230 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987232 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987233 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987235 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987237 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987238 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987240 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987242 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987244 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987245 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987250 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987251 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987254 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987260 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987267 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987268 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987269 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987273 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987274 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987276 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987277 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987281 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987284 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987286 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987289 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987292 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987294 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987295 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987297 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987298 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987300 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987301 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987302 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987304 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987306 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987308 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987309 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987310 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987314 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987315 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987318 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987319 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987321 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987322 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987323 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987325 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987327 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987328 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987329 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987330 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987332 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987334 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987335 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987337 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987338 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987340 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987341 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987342 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987346 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987347 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987348 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987349 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987354 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987357 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987358 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987359 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987361 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987362 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987363 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987364 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987366 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987368 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 45 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7987369 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987370 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987371 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987374 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987377 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987378 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987380 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987382 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987383 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987386 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987389 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987390 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987391 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987392 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987396 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987397 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987399 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987402 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987403 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987404 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987405 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987406 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987407 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987409 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987410 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987412 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987415 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987416 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987417 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987418 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987424 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987425 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987433 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987437 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987438 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987440 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987443 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987444 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987452 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987454 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987458 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987462 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987463 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987464 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987468 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987472 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987473 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987475 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987476 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987478 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987480 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987482 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987485 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987486 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987487 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987488 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987490 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987492 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987494 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987495 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987496 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987497 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987499 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987501 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987502 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987508 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987510 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987511 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987513 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987516 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987517 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987520 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987524 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987525 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987532 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987535 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987541 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987542 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987546 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987551 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987559 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987560 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987561 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 46 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7987562 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987564 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987566 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987567 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987568 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987569 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987572 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987575 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987577 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987578 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987579 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987580 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987582 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987583 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987584 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987586 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987588 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987591 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987595 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987598 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987600 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987604 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987606 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987612 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987614 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987617 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987619 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987620 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987622 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987626 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987627 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987630 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987634 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987638 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987639 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987640 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987642 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987643 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987648 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987649 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987651 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987655 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987656 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987662 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987664 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987665 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987670 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987671 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987674 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987675 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987676 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987677 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987679 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987681 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987682 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987683 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987684 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987685 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987686 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987687 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987688 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987689 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987693 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987695 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987697 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987699 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987701 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987702 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987704 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987705 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987711 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987713 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987714 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987716 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987717 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987718 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987719 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987723 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987727 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987728 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987729 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987730 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987731 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 47 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7987733 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987737 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987740 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987741 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987742 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987745 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987746 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987747 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987750 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987753 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987756 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987758 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987759 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987761 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987762 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987763 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987764 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987766 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987769 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987770 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987772 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987777 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987783 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987788 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987789 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987790 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987794 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987796 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987798 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987802 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987810 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987811 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987812 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987817 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987819 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987822 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987823 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987825 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987828 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987829 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987830 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987833 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987835 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987836 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987837 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987842 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987843 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987844 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987846 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987847 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987853 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987854 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987858 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987859 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987861 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987863 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987866 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987869 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987870 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987873 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987874 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987875 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987876 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987877 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987878 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987879 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987880 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987881 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987884 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987885 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987887 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987889 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987891 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987893 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987894 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987896 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987897 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987899 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987900 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987905 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987908 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987909 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987913 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 48 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7987914 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987915 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987916 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987917 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987918 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987921 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987922 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987923 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987924 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987925 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987926 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987928 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987930 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987931 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987934 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987935 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987937 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987938 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987940 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987942 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987943 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987944 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987946 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987947 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987948 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987949 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987950 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987951 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987953 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987954 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987956 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987960 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987961 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987962 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987965 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987967 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987971 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987972 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987973 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987974 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987977 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987978 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987980 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987981 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987982 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987984 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987985 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987986 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987987 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987988 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987992 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987994 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987995 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987997 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987998 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987999 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988000 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988001 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988002 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988004 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988005 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988006 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988008 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988009 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988011 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988015 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988017 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988019 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988020 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988021 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988024 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988025 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988028 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988029 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988031 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988032 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988034 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988035 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988037 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988038 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988040 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988043 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988046 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 49 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7988048 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988049 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988050 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988051 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988053 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988056 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988058 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988061 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988062 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988064 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988066 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988067 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988068 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988072 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988074 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988075 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988077 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988079 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988080 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988081 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988082 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988084 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988086 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988090 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988091 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988092 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988093 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988094 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988096 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988099 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988101 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988107 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988109 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988110 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988112 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988114 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988115 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988118 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988119 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988120 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988121 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988123 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988124 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988126 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988128 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988132 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988134 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988138 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988142 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988143 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988144 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988145 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988146 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988148 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988150 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988154 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988155 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988156 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988157 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988158 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988161 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988167 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988168 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988171 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988172 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988174 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988180 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988181 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988184 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988185 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988190 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988192 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988193 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988194 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988195 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988196 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988197 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988199 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988202 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988203 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988204 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988208 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988211 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 50 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7988212 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988214 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988216 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988217 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988219 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988220 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988223 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988224 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988227 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988229 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988233 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988235 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988237 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988240 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988241 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988242 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988243 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988247 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988249 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988251 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988253 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988257 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988258 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988260 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988264 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988267 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988271 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988272 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988273 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988277 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988281 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988282 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988283 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988284 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988285 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988289 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988292 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988293 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988295 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988296 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988297 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988298 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988299 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988302 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988305 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988306 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988308 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988311 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988314 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988315 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988320 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988324 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988325 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988328 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988330 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988331 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988333 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988338 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988342 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988347 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988348 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988350 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988351 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988353 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988355 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988356 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988357 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988358 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988359 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988360 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988362 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988366 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988367 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988368 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988369 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988371 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988372 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988373 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988374 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988375 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988376 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988377 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988378 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 51 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7988381 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988385 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988389 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988390 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988392 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988393 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988395 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988404 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988406 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988408 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988412 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988419 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988420 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988422 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988424 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988425 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988427 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988429 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988431 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988432 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988440 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988442 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988443 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988446 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988447 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988449 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988451 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988452 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988454 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988456 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988457 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988462 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988463 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988464 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988465 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988467 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988468 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988469 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988471 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988473 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988474 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988476 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988478 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988482 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988483 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988484 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988485 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988487 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988488 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988489 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988493 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988494 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988495 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988496 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988498 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988501 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988502 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988506 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988508 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988509 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988512 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988515 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988516 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988517 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988518 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988521 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988522 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988523 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988525 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988527 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988530 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988531 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988532 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988534 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988536 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988537 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988541 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988543 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988544 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988545 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988553 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988555 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988560 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 52 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7988561 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988567 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988568 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988570 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988571 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988572 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988573 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988576 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988578 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988579 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988580 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988581 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988582 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988583 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988585 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988587 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988589 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988591 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988593 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988594 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988595 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988602 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988603 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988604 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988606 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988608 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988611 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988614 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988615 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988617 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988618 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988619 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988621 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988622 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988623 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988624 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988625 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988627 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988628 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988635 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988637 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988638 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988639 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988640 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988644 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988650 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988652 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988654 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988655 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988656 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988659 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988662 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988665 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988667 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988668 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988669 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988670 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988680 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988685 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988688 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988690 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988692 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988693 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988694 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988695 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988696 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988699 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988701 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988704 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988705 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988706 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988711 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988716 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988720 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988726 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988736 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988740 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988742 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988744 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988747 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988748 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988750 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988751 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 53 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7988756 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988759 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988761 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988763 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988768 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988770 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988774 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988778 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988779 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988781 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988783 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988785 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988786 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988788 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988789 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988797 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988798 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988799 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988800 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988803 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988805 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988809 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988811 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988812 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988813 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988814 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988816 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988822 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988823 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988824 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988825 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988832 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988836 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988838 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988852 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988854 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988858 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988861 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988864 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988865 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988867 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988871 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988872 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988874 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988875 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988876 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988877 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988882 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988885 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988889 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988890 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988894 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988898 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988904 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988909 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988919 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988920 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988923 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988928 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988929 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988933 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988936 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988939 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988943 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988958 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988966 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988968 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988974 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988981 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988984 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988986 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988996 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989001 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989004 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989005 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989006 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989017 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989019 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989020 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989023 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989026 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989031 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989032 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 54 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7989038 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989048 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989051 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989054 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989057 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989058 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989060 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989062 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989064 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989069 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989072 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989074 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989078 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989079 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989080 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989081 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989082 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989083 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989084 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989085 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989086 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989087 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989088 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989089 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989091 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989092 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989093 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989095 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989096 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989100 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989104 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989119 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989127 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989129 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989130 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989131 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989132 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989133 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989137 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989138 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989145 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989150 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989153 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989155 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989156 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989157 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989158 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989163 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989165 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989167 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989169 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989171 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989174 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989175 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989179 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989180 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989183 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989184 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989186 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989188 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989192 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989194 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989197 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989200 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989204 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989207 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989209 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989214 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989216 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989219 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989223 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989224 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989225 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989228 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989229 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989230 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989231 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989233 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989237 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989240 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989246 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989247 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989248 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 55 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7989250 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989251 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989252 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989254 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989256 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989258 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989259 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989260 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989261 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989262 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989263 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989264 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989266 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989267 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989271 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989275 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989276 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989277 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989278 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989279 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989280 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989281 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989283 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989285 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989286 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989291 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989292 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989294 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989296 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989300 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989305 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989309 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989310 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989311 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989313 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989315 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989318 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989319 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989320 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989323 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989324 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989330 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989331 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989332 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989338 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989339 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989341 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989342 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989343 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989344 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989345 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989352 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989356 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989358 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989361 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989363 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989364 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989369 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989370 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989378 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989379 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989383 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989384 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989388 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989394 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989395 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989396 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989397 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989398 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989404 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989406 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989410 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989411 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989412 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989414 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989415 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989418 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989426 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989428 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989430 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989432 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989436 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989441 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 56 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7989442 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989444 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989445 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989447 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989449 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989450 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989452 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989455 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989457 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989458 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989459 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989460 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989462 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989463 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989467 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989471 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989474 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989475 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989477 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989478 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989481 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989487 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989488 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989490 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989491 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989493 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989494 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989502 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989503 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989504 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989505 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989507 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989508 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989511 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989512 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989513 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989515 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989517 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989518 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989519 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989520 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989523 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989526 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989527 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989528 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989530 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989531 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989535 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989537 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989538 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989548 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989549 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989550 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989551 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989553 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989555 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989556 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989557 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989562 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989563 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989564 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989565 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989566 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989570 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989574 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989576 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989578 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989580 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989583 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989585 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989586 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989588 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989589 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989590 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989591 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989593 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989594 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989598 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989602 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989603 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989605 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989610 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989612 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 57 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7989614 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989617 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989623 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989624 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989626 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989627 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989628 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989629 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989633 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989637 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989638 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989640 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989645 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989646 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989647 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989648 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989649 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989656 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989657 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989658 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989660 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989663 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989664 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989666 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989669 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989671 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989674 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989676 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989677 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989678 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989681 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989682 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989683 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989684 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989685 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989688 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989689 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989690 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989692 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989693 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989698 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989701 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989710 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989711 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989713 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989717 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989719 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989721 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989727 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989730 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989732 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989733 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989734 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989737 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989738 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989740 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989745 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989746 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989747 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989748 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989750 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989756 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989757 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989758 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989759 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989760 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989761 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989762 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989769 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989771 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989772 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989775 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989778 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989779 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989780 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989781 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989783 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989784 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989786 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989787 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989791 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989793 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989794 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 58 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7989799 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989803 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989805 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989806 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989807 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989808 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989809 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989811 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989813 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989814 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989816 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989817 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989818 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989819 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989820 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989821 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989823 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989824 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989825 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989826 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989828 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989829 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989830 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989831 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989832 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989833 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989835 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989837 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989838 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989840 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989841 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989843 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989844 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989845 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989846 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989847 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989851 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989852 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989855 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989856 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989857 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989858 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989860 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989861 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989862 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989864 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989866 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989867 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989868 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989870 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989871 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989875 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989878 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989883 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989884 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989885 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989886 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989888 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989889 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989891 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989893 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989894 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989896 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989897 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989898 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989902 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989903 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989905 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989907 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989908 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989909 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989911 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989912 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989914 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989915 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989916 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989917 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989918 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989920 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989922 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989925 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989926 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989927 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 59 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7989928 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989929 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989931 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989932 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989934 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989939 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989942 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989943 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989944 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989946 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989947 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989948 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989953 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989954 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989957 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989959 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989960 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989965 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989968 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989969 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989970 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989972 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989973 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989974 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989979 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989980 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989981 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989983 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989984 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989988 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989989 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989990 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989992 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989993 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989994 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989996 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989998 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990000 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990001 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990002 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990004 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990005 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990006 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990010 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990011 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990012 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990013 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990015 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990017 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990018 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990019 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990021 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990022 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990023 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990024 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990025 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990026 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990030 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990031 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990032 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990033 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990035 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990036 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990037 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990040 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990041 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990042 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990043 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990045 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990048 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990050 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990051 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990052 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990055 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990056 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990057 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990060 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990063 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990064 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990065 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990066 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990067 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990068 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 60 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7990071 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990075 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990077 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990078 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990079 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990080 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990082 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990083 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990084 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990085 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990086 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990087 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990088 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990090 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990094 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990096 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990097 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990098 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990099 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990102 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990103 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990105 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990106 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990108 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990109 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990118 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990119 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990120 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990123 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990126 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990133 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990136 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990145 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990146 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990153 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990154 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990155 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990159 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990165 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990166 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990178 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990184 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990186 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990190 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990196 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990199 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990201 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990203 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990204 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990208 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990211 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990215 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990219 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990221 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990228 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990230 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990232 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990233 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990235 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990236 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990240 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990241 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990242 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990245 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990247 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990248 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990249 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990251 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990254 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990265 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990273 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990277 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990280 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990284 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990285 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990286 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990287 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990289 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990293 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990298 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990301 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990302 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990304 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 61 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7990306 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990317 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990318 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990321 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990325 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990327 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990328 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990329 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990333 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990336 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990338 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990340 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990341 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990342 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990345 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990346 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990347 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990351 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990353 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990357 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990359 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990364 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990365 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990366 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990370 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990373 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990375 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990376 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990382 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990386 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990387 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990388 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990391 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990396 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990398 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990400 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990403 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990404 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990406 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990408 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990411 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990412 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990413 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990414 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990416 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990420 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990426 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990428 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990431 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990432 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990435 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990436 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990437 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990438 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990439 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990440 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990442 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990443 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990445 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990446 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990447 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990454 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990457 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990459 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990462 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990467 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990468 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990470 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990472 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990474 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990476 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990478 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990481 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990482 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990483 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990484 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990485 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990486 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990487 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990489 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990491 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990494 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990500 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 62 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7990501 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990502 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990503 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990508 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990514 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990515 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990518 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990519 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990521 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990524 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990526 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990529 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990533 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990535 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990536 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990537 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990538 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990544 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990547 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990548 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990552 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990553 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990555 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990556 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990557 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990559 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990566 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990567 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990568 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990571 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990573 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990574 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990575 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990576 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990578 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990580 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990581 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990583 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990586 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990590 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990595 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990605 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990608 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990611 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990612 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990614 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990615 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990618 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990619 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990620 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990621 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990626 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990627 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990630 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990632 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990633 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990635 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990638 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990640 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990648 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990649 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990653 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990654 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990655 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990661 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990663 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990670 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990671 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990672 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990681 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990682 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990683 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990684 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990685 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990693 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990694 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990701 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990702 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990703 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990706 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990708 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990712 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990716 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 63 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7990717 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990718 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990719 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990720 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990721 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990722 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990726 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990728 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990729 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990732 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990734 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990736 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990738 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990743 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990748 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990749 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990753 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990754 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990755 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990756 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990758 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990759 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990766 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990767 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990769 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990770 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990772 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990774 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990778 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990780 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990781 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990782 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990786 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990788 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990789 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990790 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990791 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990796 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990799 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990802 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990804 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990817 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990824 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990826 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990829 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990830 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990839 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990850 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990853 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990855 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990863 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990865 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990867 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990871 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990886 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990887 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990888 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990892 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990894 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990896 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990897 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990898 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990899 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990900 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990902 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990905 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990907 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990909 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990910 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990917 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990919 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990920 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990921 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990925 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990926 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990927 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990933 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990934 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990935 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990937 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990940 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990942 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990947 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 64 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7990961 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990962 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990967 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990970 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990971 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990974 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990976 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990978 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990980 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990985 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990987 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990988 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990989 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990990 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990992 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7990999 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991001 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991002 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991003 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991007 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991010 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991011 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991016 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991020 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991021 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991022 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991023 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991024 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991025 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991028 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991029 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991030 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991033 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991034 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991035 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991036 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991037 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991043 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991046 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991047 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991048 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991051 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991053 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991056 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991057 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991059 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991067 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991068 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991069 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991070 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991071 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991072 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991073 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991075 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991077 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991078 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991079 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991080 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991084 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991087 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991089 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991091 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991092 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991096 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991097 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991098 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991099 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991100 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991101 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991105 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991107 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991109 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991112 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991113 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991115 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991118 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991119 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991122 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991124 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991127 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991128 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991129 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991133 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 65 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7991136 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991137 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991141 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991143 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991154 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991155 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991156 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991157 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991161 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991164 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991165 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991166 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991170 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991175 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991176 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991177 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991179 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991180 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991184 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991191 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991193 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991195 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991196 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991198 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991199 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991202 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991205 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991208 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991209 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991210 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991214 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991217 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991218 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991219 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991220 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991221 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991223 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991225 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991227 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991228 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991229 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991231 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991233 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991234 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991236 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991238 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991241 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991243 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991244 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991246 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991247 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991251 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991252 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991254 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991255 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991257 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991258 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991260 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991261 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991262 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991263 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991266 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991274 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991276 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991278 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991279 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991280 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991281 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991282 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991284 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991287 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991289 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991293 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991295 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991296 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991298 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991301 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991303 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991304 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991305 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991306 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991307 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991309 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 66 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7991315 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991316 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991317 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991321 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991327 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991330 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991331 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991334 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991337 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991339 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991345 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991351 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991352 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991356 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991359 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991360 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991362 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991364 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991366 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991367 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991368 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991370 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991371 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991373 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991376 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991377 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991381 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991384 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991388 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991390 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991392 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991393 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991394 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991395 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991396 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991398 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991399 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991401 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991405 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991406 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991408 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991410 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991416 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991417 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991419 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991420 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991422 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991429 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991430 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991434 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991439 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991442 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991444 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991449 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991457 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991462 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991464 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991466 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991467 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991468 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991471 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991474 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991475 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991476 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991478 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991479 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991480 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991481 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991484 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991485 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991486 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991487 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991489 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991491 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991492 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991493 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991494 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991496 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991497 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991498 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991499 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991501 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991502 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 67 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7991507 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991508 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991512 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991513 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991517 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991518 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991521 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991522 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991523 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991524 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991526 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991529 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991531 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991532 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991534 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991537 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991538 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991540 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991541 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991543 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991545 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991546 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991547 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991549 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991551 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991552 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991554 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991557 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991559 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991562 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991563 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991564 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991566 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991568 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991569 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991571 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991576 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991584 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991586 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991589 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991591 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991592 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991595 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991597 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991599 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991600 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991603 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991604 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991605 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991606 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991609 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991610 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991612 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991613 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991614 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991615 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991616 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991617 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991619 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991622 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991628 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991630 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991632 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991634 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991638 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991639 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991641 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991642 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991643 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991645 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991646 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991647 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991650 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991652 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991653 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991655 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991656 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991663 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991668 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991669 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991674 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991678 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991679 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 68 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7991683 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991684 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991687 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991688 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991689 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991691 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991692 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991693 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991697 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991700 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991702 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991705 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991706 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991707 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991709 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991713 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991714 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991717 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991719 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991720 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991723 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991726 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991728 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991730 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991732 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991733 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991734 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991737 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991743 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991747 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991749 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991750 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991751 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991752 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991755 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991758 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991764 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991767 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991770 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991771 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991776 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991777 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991778 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991779 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991780 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991781 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991782 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991784 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991787 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991789 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991791 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991792 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991796 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991798 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991799 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991801 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991802 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991803 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991807 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991808 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991809 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991810 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991811 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991813 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991814 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991815 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991816 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991817 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991818 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991821 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991824 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991825 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991827 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991830 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991831 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991833 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991835 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991836 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991838 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991839 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991840 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991841 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991842 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 69 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7991843 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991844 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991845 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991846 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991847 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991850 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991855 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991857 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991858 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991859 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991860 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991861 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991862 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991863 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991864 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991866 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991867 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991868 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991871 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991873 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991874 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991875 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991879 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991880 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991881 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991882 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991883 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991885 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991886 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991888 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991889 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991890 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991892 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991894 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991896 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991897 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991899 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991900 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991901 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991902 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991903 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991905 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991906 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991907 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991909 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991910 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991911 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991912 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991913 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991915 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991916 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991917 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991919 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991921 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991923 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991933 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991934 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991935 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991936 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991937 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991938 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991939 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991941 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991942 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991943 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991944 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991946 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991950 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991952 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991953 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991954 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991957 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991960 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991963 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991965 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991967 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991969 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991970 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991971 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991973 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991975 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991976 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991978 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 70 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7991979 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991981 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991982 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991983 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991984 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991986 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991989 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991990 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991991 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991992 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991993 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991994 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991996 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991997 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991998 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991999 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992001 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992005 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992006 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992007 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992008 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992009 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992010 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992011 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992013 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992015 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992018 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992020 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992022 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992023 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992025 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992026 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992027 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992029 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992030 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992031 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992032 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992033 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992035 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992036 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992037 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992040 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992041 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992042 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992044 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992047 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992052 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992053 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992054 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992056 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992059 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992061 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992062 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992063 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992064 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992065 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992066 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992067 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992068 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992069 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992071 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992072 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992073 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992075 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992076 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992077 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992078 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992079 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992082 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992083 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992084 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992085 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992086 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992087 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992090 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992091 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992093 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992094 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992096 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992097 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992099 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992105 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992106 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 71 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7992107 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992111 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992113 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992114 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992116 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992117 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992118 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992123 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992127 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992133 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992136 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992140 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992147 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992148 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992150 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992152 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992154 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992155 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992160 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992163 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992164 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992165 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992169 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992174 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992179 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992181 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992182 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992183 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992184 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992193 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992194 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992199 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992200 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992201 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992205 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992213 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992216 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992219 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992220 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992222 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992223 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992224 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992225 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992226 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992231 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992232 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992235 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992236 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992241 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992243 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992245 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992246 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992248 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992251 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992252 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992253 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992254 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992255 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992256 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992257 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992258 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992259 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992260 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992261 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992262 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992264 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992265 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992266 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992267 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992269 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992286 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992287 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992288 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992292 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992293 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992298 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992299 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992305 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992321 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992322 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992329 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992330 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992334 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 72 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7992337 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992340 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992341 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992342 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992344 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992347 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992350 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992351 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992357 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992358 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992363 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992379 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992380 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992382 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992383 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992385 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992388 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992393 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992394 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992395 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992400 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992401 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992402 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992405 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992406 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992409 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992412 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992419 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992420 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992424 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992425 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992426 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992429 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992430 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992433 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992435 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992444 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992447 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992448 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992451 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992455 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992457 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992460 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992466 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992468 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992471 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992476 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992480 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992487 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992491 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992492 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992498 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992499 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992500 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992501 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992502 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992507 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992513 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992517 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992519 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992520 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992521 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992522 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992523 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992526 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992531 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992535 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992538 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992541 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992543 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992544 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992546 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992547 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992548 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992550 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992553 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992559 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992560 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992561 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992562 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992569 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992571 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992572 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 73 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7992574 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992577 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992578 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992579 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992580 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992582 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992585 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992589 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992591 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992592 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992594 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992596 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992602 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992603 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992605 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992607 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992609 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992612 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992615 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992616 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992618 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992619 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992620 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992622 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992624 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992626 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992632 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992633 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992635 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992636 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992638 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992641 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992643 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992645 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992646 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992648 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992653 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992655 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992656 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992659 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992660 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992661 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992662 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992664 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992673 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992683 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992685 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992686 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992693 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992698 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992700 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992701 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992703 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992704 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992705 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992713 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992714 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992717 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992726 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992730 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992731 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992735 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992740 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992745 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992747 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992748 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992753 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992754 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992756 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992758 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992762 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992763 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992765 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992768 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992771 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992773 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992776 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992777 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992782 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992787 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992789 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992790 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992793 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 74 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7992795 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992796 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992798 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992799 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992802 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992807 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992809 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992811 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992812 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992813 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992814 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992817 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992818 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992820 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992823 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992825 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992827 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992829 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992830 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992831 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992833 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992835 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992836 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992837 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992839 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992840 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992841 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992843 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992845 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992846 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992848 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992849 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992851 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992854 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992857 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992858 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992860 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992862 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992864 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992866 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992867 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992868 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992870 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992871 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992873 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992874 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992876 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992877 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992880 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992881 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992883 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992886 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992888 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992891 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992894 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992900 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992903 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992909 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992917 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992919 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992924 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992927 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992929 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992932 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992933 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992940 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992941 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992943 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992946 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992948 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992949 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992955 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992956 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992957 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992959 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992963 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992970 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992972 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992976 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992978 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992979 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992981 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992983 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 75 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7992985 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992987 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992988 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992992 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992993 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992996 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992997 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992998 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7992999 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993000 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993002 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993006 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993011 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993018 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993019 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993023 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993025 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993026 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993027 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993029 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993030 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993031 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993032 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993034 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993035 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993036 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993039 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993044 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993046 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993048 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993051 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993052 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993073 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993074 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993077 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993082 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993084 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993085 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993090 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993091 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993092 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993093 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993099 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993100 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993103 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993106 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993108 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993109 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993110 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993113 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993115 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993118 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993119 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993120 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993124 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993127 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993129 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993132 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993145 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993149 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993152 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993153 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993156 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993157 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993161 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993163 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993166 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993172 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993177 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993178 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993180 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993181 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993188 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993190 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993193 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993194 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993196 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993197 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993199 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993200 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993206 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993215 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993217 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 76 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7993219 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993223 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993227 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993230 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993235 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993238 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993241 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993244 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993247 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993248 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993249 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993250 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993251 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993254 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993258 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993259 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993260 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993261 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993263 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993266 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993269 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993277 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993279 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993280 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993281 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993282 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993288 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993294 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993298 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993299 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993300 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993301 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993302 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993305 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993306 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993311 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993312 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993318 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993319 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993322 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993323 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993324 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993326 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993327 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993329 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993330 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993335 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993337 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993338 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993339 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993342 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993343 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993347 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993348 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993352 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993355 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993356 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993357 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993360 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993361 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993363 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993365 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993366 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993367 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993372 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993374 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993375 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993380 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993382 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993383 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993392 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993395 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993401 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993406 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993409 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993411 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993416 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993428 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993431 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993433 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993434 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993440 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993442 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 77 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7993446 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993448 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993451 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993453 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993454 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993455 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993456 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993461 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993462 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993463 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993465 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993468 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993470 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993471 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993477 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993478 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993479 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993480 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993481 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993482 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993484 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993486 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993487 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993488 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993489 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993490 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993491 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993495 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993498 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993499 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993500 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993502 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993503 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993505 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993507 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993508 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993510 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993511 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993515 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993516 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993517 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993522 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993523 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993524 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993525 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993526 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993527 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993528 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993532 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993536 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993537 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993539 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993540 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993541 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993542 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993544 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993546 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993547 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993548 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993549 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993551 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993552 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993554 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993556 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993557 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993565 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993567 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993568 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993569 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993573 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993575 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993576 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993580 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993582 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993583 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993585 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993586 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993587 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993591 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993592 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993594 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993595 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993599 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 78 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7993601 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993606 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993609 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993613 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993616 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993620 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993622 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993626 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993628 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993634 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993635 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993637 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993641 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993644 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993646 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993648 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993649 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993652 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993655 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993658 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993665 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993666 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993669 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993670 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993673 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993675 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993676 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993678 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993681 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993682 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993683 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993684 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993685 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993690 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993692 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993695 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993696 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993699 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993700 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993701 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993702 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993706 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993709 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993711 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993713 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993716 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993717 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993721 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993725 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993727 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993729 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993732 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993738 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993740 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993743 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993744 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993746 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993747 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993748 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993750 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993751 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993753 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993754 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993756 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993757 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993761 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993763 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993764 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993765 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993768 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993770 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993771 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993772 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993778 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993784 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993785 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993787 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993788 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993789 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993791 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993792 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993793 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993797 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 79 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7993799 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993800 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993802 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993803 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993804 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993805 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993806 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993807 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993809 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993810 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993811 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993813 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993814 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993815 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993817 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993818 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993823 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993826 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993827 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993828 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993830 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993835 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993836 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993838 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993841 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993842 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993843 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993845 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993847 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993848 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993849 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993855 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993856 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993859 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993860 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993862 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993863 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993864 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993865 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993866 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993867 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993871 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993872 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993875 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993878 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993881 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993882 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993883 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993884 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993885 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993891 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993895 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993897 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993900 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993901 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993904 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993907 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993909 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993910 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993912 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993913 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993914 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993915 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993918 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993919 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993920 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993923 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993924 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993925 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993926 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993929 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993930 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993932 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993933 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993934 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993935 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993936 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993937 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993940 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993942 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993943 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993946 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993947 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 80 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7993949 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993950 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993951 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993955 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993957 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993958 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993959 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993960 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993961 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993962 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993963 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993964 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993966 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993969 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993970 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993972 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993973 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993975 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993976 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993977 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993978 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993980 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993982 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993983 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993985 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993986 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993987 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993988 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993991 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993992 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993993 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993994 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993997 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7993998 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994003 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994006 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994007 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994008 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994010 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994011 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994013 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994014 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994016 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994020 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994024 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994026 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994028 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994029 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994030 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994031 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994032 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994034 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994036 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994037 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994038 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994040 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994041 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994046 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994047 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994048 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994050 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994052 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994053 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994054 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994055 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994056 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994057 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994058 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994060 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994061 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994063 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994066 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994069 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994072 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994076 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994077 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994078 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994079 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994080 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994081 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994082 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994083 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994085 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 81 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7994086 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994088 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994089 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994093 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994095 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994097 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994098 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994100 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994101 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994103 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994104 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994105 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994109 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994114 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994117 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994118 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994121 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994124 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994126 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994127 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994130 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994131 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994136 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994137 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994139 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994140 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994144 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994146 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994150 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994157 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994158 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994164 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994167 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994173 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994179 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994182 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994183 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994186 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994187 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994189 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994190 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994191 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994194 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994195 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994196 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994197 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994200 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994201 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994204 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994205 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994206 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994208 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994209 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994214 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994215 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994216 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994217 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994220 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994222 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994223 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994225 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994226 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994231 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994233 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994234 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994237 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994238 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994239 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994240 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994241 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994244 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994246 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994247 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994248 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994251 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994252 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994253 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994254 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994255 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994257 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994260 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994263 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994266 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 82 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7994267 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994268 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994269 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994270 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994271 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994273 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994274 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994275 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994279 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994280 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994285 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994286 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994287 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994290 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994291 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994293 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994297 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994298 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994299 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994300 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994306 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994307 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994311 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994315 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994316 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994319 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994321 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994323 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994325 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994326 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994327 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994329 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994331 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994333 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994334 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994337 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994341 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994343 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994344 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994347 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994348 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994351 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994352 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994353 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994354 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994355 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994359 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994360 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994361 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994363 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994367 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994370 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994372 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994373 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994374 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994375 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994381 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994382 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994383 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994385 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994387 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994388 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994391 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994398 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994399 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994401 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994402 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994409 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994410 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994414 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994420 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994421 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994422 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994423 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994424 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994428 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994431 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994434 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994436 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994439 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994440 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994442 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994443 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 83 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7994444 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994445 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994451 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994453 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994459 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994460 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994462 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994463 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994464 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994467 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994470 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994471 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994472 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994473 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994475 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994481 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994485 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994486 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994487 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994489 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994490 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994491 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994492 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994493 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994497 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994498 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994500 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994501 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994502 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994505 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994508 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994514 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994515 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994516 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994518 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994528 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994535 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994537 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994538 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994539 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994541 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994542 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994551 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994554 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994558 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994561 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994563 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994564 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994565 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994566 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994568 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994571 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994572 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994573 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994574 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994575 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994576 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994579 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994582 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994583 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994586 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994588 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994589 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994592 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994596 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994599 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994605 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994606 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994611 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994618 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994619 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994620 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994621 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994625 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994626 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994628 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994631 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994641 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994647 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994651 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994656 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994663 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994665 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 84 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7994666 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994669 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994672 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994673 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994676 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994677 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994678 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994680 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994683 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994685 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994689 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994691 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994701 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994703 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994704 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994705 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994715 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994716 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994718 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994721 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994722 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994724 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994725 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994728 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994731 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994736 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994739 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994741 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994744 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994746 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994747 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994748 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994749 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994751 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994754 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994756 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994758 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994760 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994762 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994764 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994765 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994771 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994772 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994776 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994779 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994780 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994783 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994791 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994792 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994793 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994798 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994801 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994804 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994811 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994813 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994817 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994822 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994824 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994825 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994826 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994829 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994830 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994834 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994835 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994836 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994837 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994839 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994840 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994841 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994844 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994846 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994851 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994854 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994855 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994856 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994857 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994858 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994859 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994861 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994864 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994865 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994867 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994868 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 85 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7994870 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994871 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994874 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994875 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994877 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994878 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994885 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994888 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994890 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994891 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994898 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994899 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994902 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994903 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994916 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994917 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994918 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994921 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994937 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994940 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994941 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994942 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994944 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994946 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994947 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994948 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994949 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994951 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994955 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994956 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994957 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994961 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994962 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994965 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994966 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994968 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994975 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994978 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994979 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994980 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994982 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994986 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994987 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994989 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994990 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994991 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994993 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994997 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994999 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995002 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995003 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995005 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995008 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995009 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995010 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995017 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995021 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995026 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995033 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995034 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995035 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995036 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995041 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995042 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995045 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995047 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995050 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995054 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995059 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995061 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995063 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995066 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995067 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995072 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995076 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995078 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995079 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995082 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995085 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995093 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995095 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995096 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995099 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 86 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7995104 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995106 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995110 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995111 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995114 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995120 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995122 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995123 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995128 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995129 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995131 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995132 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995135 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995136 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995139 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995140 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995145 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995148 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995150 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995152 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995154 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995156 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995157 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995158 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995159 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995169 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995176 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995177 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995181 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995184 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995190 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995192 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995196 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995199 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995200 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995206 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995217 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995218 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995230 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995231 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995239 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995242 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995248 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995253 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995254 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995256 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995260 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995262 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995264 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995265 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995267 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995278 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995280 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995287 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995292 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995295 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995296 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995301 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995309 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995310 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995313 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995316 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995317 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995318 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995319 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995321 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995324 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995325 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995328 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995333 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995336 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995342 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995343 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995351 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995353 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995360 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995365 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995366 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995369 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995374 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995377 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995378 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995379 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 87 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7995381 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995383 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995387 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995388 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995390 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995391 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995397 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995400 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995402 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995405 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995406 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995407 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995416 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995421 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995423 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995429 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995434 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995436 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995437 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995439 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995440 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995443 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995447 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995448 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995450 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995454 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995456 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995462 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995464 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995469 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995474 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995477 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995488 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995494 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995497 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995499 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995500 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995501 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995502 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995505 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995509 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995511 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995513 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995514 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995515 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995520 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995523 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995524 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995526 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995527 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995532 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995534 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995539 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995540 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995541 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995545 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995546 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995547 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995550 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995554 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995557 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995558 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995559 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995562 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995566 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995567 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995569 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995570 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995571 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995572 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995574 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995578 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995582 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995585 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995591 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995592 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995595 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995598 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995599 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995605 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995607 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995612 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995615 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 88 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7995616 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995618 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995620 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995623 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995625 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995627 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995636 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995637 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995638 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995642 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995644 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995645 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995647 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995651 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995658 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995659 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995660 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995662 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995663 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995666 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995669 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995671 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995673 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995680 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995683 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995684 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995685 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995688 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995692 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995693 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995696 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995697 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995698 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995702 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995703 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995705 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995706 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995707 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995708 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995711 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995712 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995713 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995715 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995720 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995722 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995723 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995724 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995725 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995727 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995729 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995730 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995732 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995735 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995736 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995737 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995741 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995743 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995744 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995746 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995747 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995748 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995751 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995753 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995754 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995755 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995756 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995759 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995760 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995761 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995762 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995763 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995764 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995767 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995768 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995769 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995771 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995773 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995774 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995775 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995779 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995781 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995782 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995784 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 89 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7995786 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995788 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995790 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995791 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995793 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995795 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995796 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995799 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995800 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995803 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995804 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995805 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995806 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995807 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995809 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995812 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995814 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995815 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995816 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995818 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995819 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995820 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995823 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995825 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995826 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995827 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995828 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995831 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995834 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995835 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995836 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995837 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995840 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995842 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995843 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995844 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995845 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995849 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995850 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995854 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995856 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995857 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995858 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995860 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995861 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995862 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995865 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995866 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995867 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995869 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995870 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995871 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995872 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995873 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995874 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995876 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995877 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995880 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995881 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995883 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995884 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995886 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995889 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995890 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995891 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995894 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995895 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995897 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995898 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995900 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995901 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995906 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995907 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995908 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995909 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995910 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995913 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995914 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995915 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995916 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995917 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995918 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995920 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 90 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7995922 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995925 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995927 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995929 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995930 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995931 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995932 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995933 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995935 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995938 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995939 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995940 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995941 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995943 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995944 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995945 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995946 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995947 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995948 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995949 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995951 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995954 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995955 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995956 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995959 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995961 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995962 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995963 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995964 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995965 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995967 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995968 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995969 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995971 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995972 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995976 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995977 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995979 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995981 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995984 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995986 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995987 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995988 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995989 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995990 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995991 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995992 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995996 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995998 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995999 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996002 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996005 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996006 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996008 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996009 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996010 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996011 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996012 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996018 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996019 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996020 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996021 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996022 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996023 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996024 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996025 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996026 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996027 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996028 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996031 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996034 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996036 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996037 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996038 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996039 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996040 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996041 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996045 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996048 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996049 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996052 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996053 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996055 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 91 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7996057 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996059 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996061 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996062 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996063 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996064 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996066 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996069 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996071 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996072 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996073 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996074 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996075 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996077 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996078 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996080 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996082 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996083 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996084 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996085 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996087 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996088 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996089 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996090 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996091 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996092 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996093 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996094 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996095 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996096 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996097 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996100 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996102 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996103 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996105 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996107 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996108 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996110 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996111 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996113 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996114 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996115 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996116 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996117 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996119 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996121 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996122 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996123 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996124 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996125 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996126 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996129 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996130 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996132 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996133 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996135 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996150 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996152 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996159 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996166 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996168 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996172 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996174 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996178 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996180 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996181 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996188 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996189 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996190 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996196 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996197 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996198 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996200 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996201 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996203 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996207 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996209 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996212 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996213 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996216 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996218 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996219 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996223 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 92 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7996225 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996229 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996232 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996233 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996234 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996235 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996236 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996237 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996239 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996240 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996242 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996246 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996248 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996253 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996256 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996257 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996258 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996263 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996270 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996271 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996272 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996274 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996275 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996280 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996281 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996282 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996285 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996286 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996292 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996293 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996296 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996297 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996299 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996300 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996305 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996311 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996313 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996315 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996316 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996318 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996319 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996321 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996322 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996326 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996328 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996330 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996332 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996335 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996336 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996337 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996340 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996341 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996342 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996344 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996345 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996346 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996349 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996351 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996353 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996354 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996357 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996358 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996361 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996362 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996364 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996365 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996366 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996367 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996368 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996370 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996371 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996372 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996373 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996374 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996380 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996382 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996385 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996386 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996389 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996390 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996391 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996394 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996396 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 93 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7996399 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996400 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996405 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996407 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996408 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996409 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996410 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996413 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996414 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996417 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996424 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996428 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996430 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996431 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996432 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996434 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996437 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996439 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996440 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996442 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996443 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996444 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996445 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996446 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996456 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996457 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996459 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996460 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996463 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996464 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996465 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996466 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996473 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996474 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996476 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996478 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996479 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996481 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996487 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996488 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996489 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996490 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996491 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996492 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996495 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996500 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996503 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996506 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996507 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996508 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996510 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996511 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996512 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996515 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996516 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996521 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996522 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996523 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996525 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996530 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996533 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996537 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996543 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996544 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996546 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996547 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996549 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996551 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996552 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996554 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996555 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996556 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996558 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996559 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996561 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996562 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996564 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996565 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996571 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996572 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996573 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996576 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996578 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 94 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7996579 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996581 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996582 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996587 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996604 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996605 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996612 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996616 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996622 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996624 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996625 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996626 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996627 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996630 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996632 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996633 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996635 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996638 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996644 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996645 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996649 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996653 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996654 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996658 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996668 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996670 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996672 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996673 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996678 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996682 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996684 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996690 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996694 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996695 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996697 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996699 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996700 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996707 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996714 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996715 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996720 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996721 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996723 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996726 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996730 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996731 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996732 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996739 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996740 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996742 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996744 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996745 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996746 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996747 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996750 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996752 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996753 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996757 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996760 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996761 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996762 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996764 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996765 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996766 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996771 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996772 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996774 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996776 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996777 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996780 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996781 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996782 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996783 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996784 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996786 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996789 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996791 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996792 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996793 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996796 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996797 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996798 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996801 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 95 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7996804 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996806 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996807 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996815 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996816 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996817 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996821 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996826 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996830 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996832 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996833 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996834 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996835 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996836 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996837 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996840 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996844 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996845 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996849 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996851 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996853 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996854 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996859 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996863 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996866 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996867 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996869 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996870 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996874 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996877 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996878 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996885 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996890 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996893 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996897 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996899 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996905 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996906 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996913 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996915 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996922 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996927 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996929 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996932 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996933 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996934 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996936 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996937 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996939 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996943 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996944 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996950 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996954 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996966 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996967 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996970 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996973 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996980 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996981 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996990 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7996997 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997000 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997001 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997002 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997013 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997015 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997016 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997017 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997020 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997023 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997024 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997027 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997029 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997032 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997038 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997044 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997059 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997063 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997089 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997101 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997203 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997205 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997210 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 96 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7997211 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997212 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997213 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997218 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997226 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997233 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997236 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997238 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997239 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997246 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997247 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997255 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997257 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997267 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997272 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997274 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997275 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997278 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997280 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997287 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997307 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997325 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997327 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997330 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997339 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997349 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997350 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997352 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997367 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997368 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997384 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997386 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997399 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997402 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997405 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997407 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997409 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997445 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997448 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997454 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997455 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997462 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997466 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997469 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997470 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997477 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997478 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997480 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997482 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997483 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997486 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997487 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997490 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997491 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997498 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997499 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997509 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997516 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997518 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997520 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997524 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997525 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997529 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997531 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997532 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997534 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997536 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997537 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997538 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997540 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997543 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997546 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997549 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997550 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997551 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997552 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997553 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997555 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997558 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997561 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997562 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997563 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997566 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 97 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7997569 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997570 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997571 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997572 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997573 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997574 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997575 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997578 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997580 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997581 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997583 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997584 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997585 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997586 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997588 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997589 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997591 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997593 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997597 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997599 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997603 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997605 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997606 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997607 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997609 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997610 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997611 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997612 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997614 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997615 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997620 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997621 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997622 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997625 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997626 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997627 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997628 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997630 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997632 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997635 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997637 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997640 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997641 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997643 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997645 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997646 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997647 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997652 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997653 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997654 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997658 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997660 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997661 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997670 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997671 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997673 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997675 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997677 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997678 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997681 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997686 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997691 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997692 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997694 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997696 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997698 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997702 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997704 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997706 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997707 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997711 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997712 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997714 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997715 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997718 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997724 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997725 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997727 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997729 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997730 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997732 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997733 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997735 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 98 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7997736 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997737 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997741 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997742 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997744 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997745 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997747 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997748 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997750 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997752 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997753 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997755 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997758 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997759 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997762 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997763 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997776 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997780 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997781 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997782 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997784 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997786 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997787 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997788 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997789 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997790 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997791 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997793 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997797 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997799 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997800 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997804 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997805 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997806 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997808 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997809 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997810 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997813 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997815 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997818 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997821 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997823 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997831 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997833 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997835 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997836 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997837 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997838 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997840 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997841 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997845 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997846 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997847 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997849 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997850 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997851 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997852 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997853 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997854 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997855 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997858 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997859 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997860 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997862 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997865 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997866 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997867 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997870 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997871 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997873 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997875 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997876 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997877 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997878 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997879 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997880 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997882 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997883 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997885 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997886 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997889 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997892 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997893 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 99 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7997894 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997895 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997896 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997900 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997901 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997902 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997904 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997906 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997907 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997909 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997911 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997913 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997916 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997917 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997918 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997922 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997923 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997924 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997927 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997928 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997929 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997931 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997934 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997935 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997936 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997939 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997941 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997942 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997943 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997944 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997945 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997947 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997950 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997952 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997953 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997955 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997957 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997958 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997959 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997961 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997964 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997965 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997966 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997968 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997971 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997972 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997973 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997974 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997975 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997977 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997980 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997983 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997984 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997988 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997989 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997990 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997992 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997993 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997994 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997997 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7997998 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998000 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998001 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998003 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998005 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998006 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998007 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998009 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998010 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998011 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998012 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998014 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998015 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998019 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998020 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998021 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998022 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998023 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998024 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998026 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998027 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998028 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998030 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 100 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7998031 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998033 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998034 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998035 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998036 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998037 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998038 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998039 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998041 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998042 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998043 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998044 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998045 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998046 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998047 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998048 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998049 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998050 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998051 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998053 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998055 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998057 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998060 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998061 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998062 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998063 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998065 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998066 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998067 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998070 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998071 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998073 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998074 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998075 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998076 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998077 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998078 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998079 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998080 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998082 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998084 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998085 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998087 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998088 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998090 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998091 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998092 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998093 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998097 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998099 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998100 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998102 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998103 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998106 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998107 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998109 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998113 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998114 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998116 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998117 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998118 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998121 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998122 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998124 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998125 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998126 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998129 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998131 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998132 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998133 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998135 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998136 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998137 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998138 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998140 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998144 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998146 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998149 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998154 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998155 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998156 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998158 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998160 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 101 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7998162 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998163 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998165 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998167 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998168 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998170 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998171 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998172 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998178 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998179 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998180 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998181 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998182 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998183 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998184 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998186 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998189 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998191 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998192 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998194 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998195 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998196 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998198 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998200 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998201 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998206 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998207 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998209 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998210 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998213 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998214 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998216 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998217 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998226 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998227 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998228 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998231 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998233 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998239 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998243 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998244 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998245 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998247 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998249 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998250 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998252 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998254 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998255 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998265 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998269 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998271 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998273 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998279 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998287 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998289 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998291 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998292 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998294 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998295 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998296 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998300 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998301 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998302 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998303 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998306 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998307 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998308 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998310 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998312 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998313 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998318 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998320 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998322 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998323 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998325 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998327 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998328 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998329 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998331 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998333 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998334 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998335 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998339 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 102 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7998340 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998341 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998342 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998344 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998345 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998347 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998353 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998354 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998355 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998356 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998357 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998359 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998360 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998362 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998363 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998366 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998368 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998369 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998375 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998376 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998378 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998379 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998381 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998383 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998387 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998390 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998391 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998393 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998394 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998395 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998397 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998401 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998402 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998405 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998407 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998410 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998411 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998412 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998413 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998415 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998416 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998417 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998418 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998422 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998424 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998426 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998427 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998428 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998429 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998432 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998434 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998436 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998443 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998445 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998446 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998448 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998453 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998454 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998455 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998460 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998462 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998463 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998468 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998478 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998479 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998483 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998486 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998491 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998495 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998498 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998502 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998506 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998510 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998512 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998518 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998519 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998520 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998522 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998526 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998528 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998532 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998533 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998536 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 103 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7998537 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998538 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998540 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998541 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998543 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998544 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998546 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998547 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998548 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998549 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998550 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998552 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998554 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998555 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998556 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998560 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998562 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998564 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998567 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998568 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998573 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998574 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998575 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998577 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998578 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998580 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998582 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998585 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998590 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998596 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998598 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998604 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998606 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998610 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998614 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998615 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998623 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998628 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998629 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998630 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998633 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998634 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998637 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998639 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998645 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998649 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998651 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998655 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998656 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998657 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998658 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998663 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998664 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998666 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998668 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998675 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998676 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998691 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998693 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998700 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998701 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998702 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998716 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998721 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998722 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998723 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998724 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998725 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998729 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998730 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998731 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998732 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998736 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998739 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998740 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998741 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998742 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998745 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998748 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998750 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998752 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998753 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998758 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 104 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7998759 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998760 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998762 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998764 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998767 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998769 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998771 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998772 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998779 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998781 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998783 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998784 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998786 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998794 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998803 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998807 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998836 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998837 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998846 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998855 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998858 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998874 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998880 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998900 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998911 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998943 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998944 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998946 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998949 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998951 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998952 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998953 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998954 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998956 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998957 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998959 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998964 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998966 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998969 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998972 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998973 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998975 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998976 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998980 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998981 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998982 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998983 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998984 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998985 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998986 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998987 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998988 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998989 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998990 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998992 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998993 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998995 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998996 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7998997 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999004 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999005 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999006 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999009 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999010 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999011 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999015 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999017 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999018 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999019 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999021 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999023 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999026 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999029 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999030 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999032 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999035 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999036 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999037 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999039 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999040 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999041 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999044 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999045 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 105 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7999046 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999049 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999050 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999051 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999053 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999054 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999055 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999058 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999059 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999060 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999062 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999063 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999064 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999065 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999066 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999070 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999072 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999075 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999076 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999077 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999078 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999079 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999082 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999083 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999084 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999085 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999088 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999089 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999091 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999094 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999095 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999096 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999097 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999098 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999099 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999101 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999103 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999105 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999106 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999107 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999108 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999110 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999111 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999113 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999114 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999118 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999119 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999120 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999122 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999123 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999124 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999125 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999126 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999127 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999128 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999131 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999132 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999135 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999138 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999140 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999142 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999144 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999147 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999148 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999150 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999151 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999160 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999161 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999162 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999163 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999164 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999167 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999168 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999170 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999171 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999172 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999173 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999174 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999180 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999181 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999182 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999185 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999186 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 106 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7999187 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999189 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999190 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999193 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999194 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999195 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999198 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999199 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999200 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999202 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999205 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999207 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999208 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999209 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999210 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999211 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999213 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999216 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999217 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999219 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999220 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999221 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999224 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999225 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999227 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999228 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999231 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999232 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999233 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999234 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999236 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999238 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999239 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999241 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999242 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999270 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999274 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999286 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999291 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999292 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999297 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999302 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999303 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999305 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999315 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999319 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999335 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999343 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999344 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999351 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999367 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999368 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999370 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999376 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999382 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999383 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999384 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999386 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999390 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999391 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999393 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999394 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999398 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999404 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999410 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999413 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999415 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999416 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999424 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999427 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999440 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999443 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999444 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999447 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999448 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999460 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999464 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999468 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999473 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999474 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999479 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999482 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999483 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 107 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7999489 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999491 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999501 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999502 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999503 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999506 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999510 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999516 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999521 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999525 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999542 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999544 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999547 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999552 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999553 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999564 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999566 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999568 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999569 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999570 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999572 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999573 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999574 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999576 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999578 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999582 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999584 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999586 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999587 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999592 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999593 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999594 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999595 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999601 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999602 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999603 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999604 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999605 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999610 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999613 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999617 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999620 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999621 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999624 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999628 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999629 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999630 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999632 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999636 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999639 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999641 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999642 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999643 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999646 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999649 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999650 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999651 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999652 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999653 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999655 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999657 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999660 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999662 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999664 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999666 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999667 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999670 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999671 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999672 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999677 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999680 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999681 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999683 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999685 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999686 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999687 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999689 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999692 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999693 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999694 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999698 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999699 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999702 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 108 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7999703 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999705 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999706 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999709 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999711 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999712 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999718 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999720 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999723 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999728 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999729 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999730 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999733 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999734 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999735 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999736 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999737 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999739 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999740 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999747 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999755 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999757 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999759 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999762 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999765 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999770 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999771 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999772 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999773 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999780 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999781 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999782 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999783 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999784 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999785 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999786 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999787 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999788 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999790 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999791 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999793 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999794 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999795 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999797 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999798 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999806 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999807 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999808 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999814 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999818 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999820 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999821 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999822 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999823 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999824 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999826 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999830 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999831 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999833 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999837 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999839 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999840 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999842 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999843 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999845 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999846 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999849 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999851 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999852 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999854 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999856 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999860 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999861 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999863 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999868 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999869 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999874 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999879 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999881 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999882 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999884 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999885 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999887 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 109 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7999888 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999892 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999894 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999895 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999896 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999897 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999902 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999904 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999905 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999906 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999907 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999908 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999910 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999914 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999916 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999918 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999919 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999923 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999925 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999929 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999931 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999932 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999933 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999934 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999938 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999939 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999942 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999944 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999946 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999947 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999948 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999949 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999950 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999952 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999954 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999956 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999957 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999961 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999963 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999965 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999966 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999967 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999969 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999970 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999971 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999972 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999974 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999975 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999976 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999977 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999980 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999983 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999984 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999986 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999987 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999989 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999991 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999992 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999993 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999996 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999998 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000000 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000001 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000002 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000003 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000004 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000007 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000008 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000010 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000011 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000014 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000017 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000018 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000019 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000020 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000021 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000022 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000023 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000031 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000034 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000035 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000036 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000037 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 110 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 8000038 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000042 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000043 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000045 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000046 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000047 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000050 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000051 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000052 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000053 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000054 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000055 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000056 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000057 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000059 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000061 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000062 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000063 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000065 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000066 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000068 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000070 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000071 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000072 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000073 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000075 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000077 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000079 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000080 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000081 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000084 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000085 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000086 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000088 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000089 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000090 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000091 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000094 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000095 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000096 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000099 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000100 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000101 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000102 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000104 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000106 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000107 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000109 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000110 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000114 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000117 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000118 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000119 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000121 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000122 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000128 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000130 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000131 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000132 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000134 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000137 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000138 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000141 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000142 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000143 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000144 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000145 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000148 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000149 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000151 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000156 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000158 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000160 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000161 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000164 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000165 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000167 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000170 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000171 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000172 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000173 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000174 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000175 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 111 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 8000180 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000181 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000185 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000186 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000187 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000189 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000191 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000194 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000195 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000198 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000199 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000200 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000201 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000205 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000206 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000209 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000210 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000216 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000218 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000220 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000221 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000224 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000225 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000231 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000236 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000244 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000248 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000254 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000256 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000258 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000261 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000263 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000264 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000268 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000269 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000270 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000271 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000272 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000273 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000277 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000283 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000284 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000288 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000291 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000294 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000297 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000299 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000300 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000303 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000304 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000307 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000313 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000314 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000315 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000316 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000318 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000319 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000321 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000322 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000324 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000325 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000326 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000328 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000333 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000336 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000339 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000341 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000343 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000347 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000349 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000350 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000353 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000354 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000355 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000358 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000361 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000365 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000366 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000367 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000368 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000369 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000370 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000371 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 112 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 8000372 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000373 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000374 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000377 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000378 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000379 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000381 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000385 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000386 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000387 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000388 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000390 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000394 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000399 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000401 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000403 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000404 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000408 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000411 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000416 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000417 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000419 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000421 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000422 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000427 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000432 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000433 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000434 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000435 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000437 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000439 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000440 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000442 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000443 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000444 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000445 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000447 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000450 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000451 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000452 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000458 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000460 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000461 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000463 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000464 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000465 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000470 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000472 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000473 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000474 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000475 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000476 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000477 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000481 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000484 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000486 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000487 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000492 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000498 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000501 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000503 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000505 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000506 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000509 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000516 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000518 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000520 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000521 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000526 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000531 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000532 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000535 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000540 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000542 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000544 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000545 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000546 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000547 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000548 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000552 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000560 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000563 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000564 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 113 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 8000569 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000571 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000572 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000573 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000576 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000580 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000581 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000582 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000586 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000589 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000591 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000601 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000603 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000610 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000611 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000613 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000614 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000615 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000616 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000617 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000618 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000619 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000620 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000621 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000622 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000624 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000625 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000626 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000627 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000628 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000629 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000630 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000631 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000632 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000633 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000634 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000635 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000636 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000637 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000638 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000640 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000641 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000642 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000643 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000644 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000645 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000647 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000648 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000649 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000654 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000666 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000670 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000672 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000674 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000676 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000677 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000678 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000679 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000681 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000685 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000687 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000688 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000689 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000690 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000691 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000692 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000697 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000702 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000707 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000709 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000710 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000712 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000714 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000719 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000725 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000726 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000731 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000732 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000744 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000750 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000752 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000753 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000755 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 114 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 8000756 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000757 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000760 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000768 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000769 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000771 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000772 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000775 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000777 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000779 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000781 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000784 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000790 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000792 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000794 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000796 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000800 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000802 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000806 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000807 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000810 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000811 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000813 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000814 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000815 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000820 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000824 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000825 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000830 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000833 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000836 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000838 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000839 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000841 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000842 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000843 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000844 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000846 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000847 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000849 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000857 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000861 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000864 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000866 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000876 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000882 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000887 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000905 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000907 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000911 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000912 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000913 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000919 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000920 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000926 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000932 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000934 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000940 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000946 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000949 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000951 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000955 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000958 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000962 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000963 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000965 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000968 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000969 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000972 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000975 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000977 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000978 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000980 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000981 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000984 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000985 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000989 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000994 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001008 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001012 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001013 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001016 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001018 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 115 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 8001019 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001022 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001023 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001024 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001025 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001026 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001027 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001028 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001029 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001030 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001031 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001034 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001035 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001036 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001037 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001038 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001039 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001040 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001045 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001046 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001047 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001048 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001050 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001051 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001052 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001055 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001056 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001057 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001058 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001059 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001061 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001062 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001064 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001065 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001066 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001067 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001068 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001069 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001070 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001073 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001074 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001076 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001077 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001078 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001081 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001082 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001083 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001085 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001086 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001087 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001089 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001092 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001094 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001096 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001098 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001099 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001100 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001105 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001107 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001108 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001113 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001114 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001119 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001123 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001126 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001127 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001129 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001131 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001137 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001138 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001139 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001140 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001141 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001143 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001144 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001145 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001146 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001147 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001148 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001150 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001151 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001152 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001153 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 116 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 8001154 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001155 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001157 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001158 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001159 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001161 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001162 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001163 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001166 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001167 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001169 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001170 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001171 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001172 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001176 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001179 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001181 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001182 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001183 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001184 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001185 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001186 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001187 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001191 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001192 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001193 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001197 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001199 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001200 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001203 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001205 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001206 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001207 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001209 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001210 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001211 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001215 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001216 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001218 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001219 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001220 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001221 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001225 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001226 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001227 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001228 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001229 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001231 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001232 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001233 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001234 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001239 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001240 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001241 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001242 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001244 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001245 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001251 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001252 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001253 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001254 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001255 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001256 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001257 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001261 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001263 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001266 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001267 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001268 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001269 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001271 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001273 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001274 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001275 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001276 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001278 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001279 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001282 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001283 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001284 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001287 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001291 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001292 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 117 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 8001293 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001295 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001297 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001298 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001299 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001300 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001303 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001304 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001309 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001311 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001312 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001313 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001314 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001317 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001319 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001322 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001324 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001326 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001329 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001330 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001332 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001334 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001335 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001336 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001337 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001338 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001339 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001341 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001343 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001346 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001348 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001349 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001350 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001362 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001366 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001370 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001371 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001386 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001394 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001398 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001409 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001444 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001446 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001467 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001491 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001501 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001509 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001530 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001531 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001532 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001535 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001538 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001543 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001545 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001550 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001552 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001554 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001555 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001556 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001560 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001564 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001565 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001566 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001568 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001570 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001571 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001572 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001578 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001584 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001585 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001586 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001589 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001590 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001600 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001601 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001603 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001608 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001609 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001610 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001615 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001620 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001621 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001622 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 118 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 8001626 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001628 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001631 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001633 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001635 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001636 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001638 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001641 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001643 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001644 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001646 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001647 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001648 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001649 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001650 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001652 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001653 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001657 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001658 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001660 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001662 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001663 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001665 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001666 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001673 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001675 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001677 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001686 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001687 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001688 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001690 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001696 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001698 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001701 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001702 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001704 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001705 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001706 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001708 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001709 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001710 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001711 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001713 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001714 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001716 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001720 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001721 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001722 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001724 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001728 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001729 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001733 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001736 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001741 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001742 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001744 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001745 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001749 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001754 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001757 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001758 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001759 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001760 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001761 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001763 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001765 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001767 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001768 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001772 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001773 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001783 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001784 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001785 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001786 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001787 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001788 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001790 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001792 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001793 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001796 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001801 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001802 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001803 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 119 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 8001804 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001805 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001807 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001809 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001810 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001812 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001813 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001814 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001817 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001818 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001822 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001823 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001824 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001826 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001828 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001829 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001830 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001831 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001834 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001835 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001837 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001838 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001844 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001849 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001852 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001859 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001863 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001864 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001865 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001869 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001873 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001874 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001879 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001882 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001885 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001886 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001890 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001894 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001896 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001900 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001901 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001903 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001904 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001906 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001907 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001909 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001911 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001913 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001918 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001919 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001921 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001922 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001929 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001930 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001932 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001933 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001934 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001935 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001936 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001937 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001940 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001941 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001945 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001947 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001953 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001956 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001958 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001959 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001960 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001962 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001964 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001965 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001966 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001967 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001971 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001972 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001973 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001974 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001975 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001977 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001978 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001979 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001985 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 120 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 8001990 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001991 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001993 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001994 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001996 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8001997 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002000 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002002 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002003 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002007 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002009 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002010 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002011 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002012 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002013 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002016 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002017 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002018 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002019 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002020 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002021 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002022 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002025 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002027 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002028 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002029 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002031 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002032 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002034 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002037 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002038 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002039 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002042 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002046 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002047 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002049 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002050 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002051 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002052 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002053 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002056 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002057 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002058 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002063 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002065 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002066 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002067 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002069 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002070 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002071 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002072 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002074 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002075 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002076 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002077 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002078 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002080 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002084 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002086 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002087 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002088 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002089 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002091 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002092 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002094 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002099 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002101 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002102 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002103 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002105 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002106 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002107 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002108 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002112 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002114 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002116 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002117 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002119 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002120 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002121 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002124 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002126 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002127 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 121 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 8002130 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002133 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002139 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002141 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002144 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002145 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002147 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002148 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002149 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002150 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002152 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002153 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002155 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002157 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002160 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002163 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002166 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002167 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002168 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002172 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002173 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002174 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002175 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002181 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002182 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002183 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002184 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002185 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002187 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002188 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002189 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002191 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002192 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002193 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002195 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002199 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002201 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002202 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002203 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002204 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002205 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002208 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002211 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002214 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002218 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002220 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002222 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002223 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002224 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002227 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002228 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002229 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002230 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002231 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002233 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002234 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002236 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002238 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002239 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002241 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002245 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002248 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002252 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002253 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002254 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002255 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002256 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002258 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002259 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002261 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002263 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002264 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002267 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002268 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002269 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002270 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002272 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002273 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002274 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002276 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002279 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002280 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002282 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 122 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 8002283 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002284 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002286 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002294 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002295 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002296 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002298 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002299 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002300 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002302 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002303 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002304 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002305 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002306 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002307 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002308 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002309 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002311 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002313 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002314 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002316 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002317 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002318 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002319 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002320 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002321 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002322 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002323 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002324 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002325 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002326 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002328 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002331 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002338 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002339 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002340 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002341 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002342 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002343 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002344 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002345 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002347 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002349 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002350 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002354 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002355 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002356 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002357 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002359 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002361 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002365 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002366 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002368 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002370 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002379 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002382 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002383 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002385 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002387 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002389 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002390 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002394 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002397 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002398 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002400 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002401 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002403 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002404 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002409 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002410 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002412 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002415 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002417 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002419 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002421 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002423 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002424 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002426 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002427 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002429 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002434 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002438 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002439 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 123 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 8002442 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002445 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002447 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002449 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002450 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002452 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002454 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002455 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002456 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002457 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002458 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002459 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002462 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002463 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002464 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002465 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002467 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002468 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002469 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002471 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002477 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002479 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002480 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002482 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002485 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002491 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002492 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002493 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002495 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002496 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002499 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002500 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002501 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002507 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002508 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002513 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002514 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002515 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002517 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002520 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002526 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002527 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002530 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002532 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002533 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002535 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002536 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002538 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002540 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002544 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002545 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002549 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002553 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002555 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002556 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002557 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002559 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002561 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002562 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002563 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002568 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002570 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002571 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002573 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002574 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002577 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002579 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002581 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002582 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002583 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002586 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002587 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002589 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002590 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002591 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002594 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002595 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002596 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002599 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002600 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002602 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002603 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002607 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 124 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 8002609 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002610 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002611 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002613 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002614 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002616 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002617 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002618 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002620 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002621 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002626 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002627 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002628 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002629 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002635 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002636 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002643 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002646 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002647 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002648 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002652 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002654 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002658 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002659 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002661 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002666 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002671 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002673 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002677 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002679 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002681 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002682 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002684 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002686 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002687 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002690 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002691 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002693 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002697 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002698 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002700 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002701 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002702 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002706 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002710 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002712 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002713 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002715 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002716 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002724 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002727 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002729 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002737 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002739 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002744 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002749 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002751 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002753 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002754 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002757 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002759 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002763 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002767 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002773 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002774 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002777 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002781 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002783 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002785 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002786 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002788 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002790 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002805 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002807 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002809 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002817 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002823 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002830 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002832 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002833 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002834 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002838 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002843 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 125 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 8002845 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002849 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002857 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002862 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002864 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002867 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002870 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002878 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002886 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002889 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002893 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002894 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002897 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002909 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002920 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002931 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002946 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002947 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002948 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002955 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002956 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002958 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002969 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002977 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002994 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8003005 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8003029 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8003039 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8003057 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8003060 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8015635 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8015658 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8015660 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8015662 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8015682 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8015683 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8015685 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8015687 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8015688 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8015699 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8015700 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 8147054 $ - No Defects but Proof of Claim Does Not Calculate to Positive Recognized Loss\n 7883907 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured\n 7897558 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured\n 7910052 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured\n 7910457 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured\n 7911365 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured\n 7758304 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7883077 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7884528 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7884539 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7884776 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7884789 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7884799 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7884832 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7886058 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7893635 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7905972 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7906390 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7907133 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7907537 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7908755 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7910730 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7911084 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7911633 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7911753 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7913158 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7913700 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7913757 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7913912 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7914605 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7914616 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7914766 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7915361 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7915525 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7915565 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7915965 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7916664 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7918111 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7972655 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979192 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7979701 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980200 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 126 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7980807 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980814 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980822 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980846 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980851 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980904 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980959 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7980989 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981030 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981116 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981131 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981173 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981174 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981175 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981176 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981177 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981178 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981179 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981180 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981181 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981182 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981183 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981184 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981185 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981186 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981187 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981188 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981189 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981190 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981191 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981192 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981193 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981194 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981195 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981196 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981197 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981198 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981199 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981200 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981201 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981202 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981203 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981204 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981205 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981206 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981207 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981208 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981209 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981210 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981211 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981212 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981213 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981214 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981215 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981216 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981217 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981218 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981219 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981220 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981221 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981222 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981225 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981226 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981227 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981228 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981229 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981230 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981231 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981236 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981237 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981248 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981249 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981251 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981252 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981259 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981260 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981261 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981264 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981265 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981266 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981267 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981268 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981269 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 127 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7981272 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981273 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981277 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981278 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981279 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981280 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981282 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7981291 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982006 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982203 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7982470 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983028 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983068 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983069 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983137 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983146 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983148 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983158 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7983921 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985392 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7985526 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986051 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986188 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7986203 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7987936 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988437 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7988839 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7989887 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991273 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7991869 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7994905 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995073 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7995777 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999012 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999073 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7999870 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000163 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 8000600 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002917 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 8002964 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 8003000 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 8003013 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 8003046 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 8003052 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 8003053 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 8003056 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 8015675 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 8015676 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 8136535 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss Does Not Calculate to a Positive Recognized Loss\n 7826987 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7882316 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7884004 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7884749 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7885962 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7886010 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7887645 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7888431 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7889005 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7893354 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7895425 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7907033 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7910397 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7911149 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7911303 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7911304 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7911783 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7912262 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7912468 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7913796 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7914077 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7914210 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7914870 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7915829 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979159 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979161 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979169 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979170 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979174 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979176 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979179 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979180 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979185 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979188 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 128 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7979195 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979218 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979221 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979222 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979239 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979246 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979249 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979258 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979267 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979281 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979283 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979287 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979290 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979297 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979304 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979307 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979311 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979325 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979326 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979332 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979333 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979338 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979339 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979344 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979348 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979350 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979353 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979354 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979358 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979360 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979361 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979362 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979365 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979370 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979375 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979378 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979381 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979388 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979391 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979393 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979398 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979409 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979410 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979413 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979416 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979420 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979429 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979434 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979439 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979449 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979453 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979459 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979461 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979464 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979472 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979475 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979476 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979477 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979481 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979486 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979487 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979490 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979498 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979502 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979512 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979516 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979519 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979520 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979527 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979533 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979537 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979540 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979545 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979548 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979550 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979562 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979574 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979577 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979584 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979585 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979591 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979595 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979598 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 129 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7979606 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979608 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979620 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979623 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979624 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979634 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979648 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979652 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979653 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979656 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979667 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979669 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979670 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979671 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979673 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979683 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979689 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979708 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979710 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979711 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979713 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979714 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979715 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979718 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979724 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979728 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979739 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979743 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979753 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979757 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979765 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979777 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979778 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979783 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979787 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979791 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979794 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979795 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979796 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979801 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979811 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979814 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979818 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979820 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979826 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979830 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979836 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979838 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979846 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979853 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979854 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979860 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979871 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979891 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979903 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979907 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979914 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979915 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979916 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979918 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979921 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979923 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979931 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979936 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979938 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979942 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979944 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979949 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979951 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979956 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979960 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979961 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979963 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979964 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979972 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979974 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979977 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979981 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979984 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979985 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7979991 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980014 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980016 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 130 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7980017 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980019 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980026 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980037 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980039 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980065 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980066 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980077 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980079 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980083 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980085 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980093 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980099 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980130 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980146 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980153 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980154 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980165 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980166 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980178 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980181 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980189 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980190 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980207 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980212 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980215 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980220 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980234 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980237 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980246 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980261 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980283 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980285 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980290 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980293 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980295 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980297 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980299 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980317 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980321 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980323 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980327 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980340 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980347 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980350 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980355 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980358 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980360 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980365 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980371 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980395 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980397 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980410 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980411 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980414 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980416 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980424 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980425 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980431 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980432 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980435 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980444 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980448 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980450 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980457 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980458 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980464 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980470 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980471 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980479 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980480 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980482 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980493 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980500 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980507 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980511 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980513 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980514 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980519 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980520 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980523 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980530 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980531 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 131 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7980532 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980538 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980540 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980543 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980545 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980554 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980555 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980556 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980559 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980566 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980573 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980574 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980576 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980584 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980588 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980591 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980594 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980597 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980598 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980609 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980616 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980620 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980627 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980629 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980636 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980639 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980640 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980641 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980647 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980652 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980658 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980666 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980669 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980681 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980686 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980699 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980700 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980705 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980706 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980708 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980711 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980713 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980714 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980716 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980721 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980730 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980739 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980743 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980750 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980751 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980756 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980760 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980761 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980763 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980767 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980780 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980785 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980787 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980791 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980792 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980796 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980797 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980798 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980810 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980816 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980817 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980824 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980833 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980835 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980841 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980842 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980845 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980849 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980850 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980859 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980860 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980861 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980862 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980863 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980864 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980865 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980866 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980867 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 132 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7980868 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980869 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980870 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980871 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980872 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980873 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980874 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980875 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980876 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980877 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980880 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980886 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980888 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980889 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980891 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980892 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980893 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980894 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980895 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980896 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980897 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980898 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980899 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980900 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980901 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980909 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980910 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980916 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980917 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980919 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980921 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980923 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980924 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980929 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980934 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980936 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980945 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980946 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980950 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980952 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980955 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980973 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980981 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980994 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7980998 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981004 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981005 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981011 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981013 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981017 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981025 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981029 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981038 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981039 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981064 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981072 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981079 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981080 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981081 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981082 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981084 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981093 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981130 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981151 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981325 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981333 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981335 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981338 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981345 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981353 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981356 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981358 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981360 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981368 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981373 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981375 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981378 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981379 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981380 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981389 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981399 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981408 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981419 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 133 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7981426 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981435 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981451 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981456 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981461 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981474 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981475 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981477 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981480 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981484 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981485 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981487 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981490 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981498 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981502 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981506 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981508 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981513 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981517 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981523 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981537 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981539 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981541 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981550 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981552 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981557 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981558 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981559 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981565 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981582 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981595 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981600 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981606 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981610 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981616 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981633 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981637 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981644 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981646 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981647 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981653 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981654 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981656 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981675 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981676 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981677 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981679 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981685 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981688 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981694 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981696 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981697 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981699 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981704 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981708 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981716 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981721 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981728 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981729 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981731 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981739 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981745 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981747 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981751 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981754 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981758 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981761 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981762 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981765 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981766 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981767 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981770 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981779 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981780 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981784 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981785 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981788 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981796 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981797 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981799 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981800 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981804 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981808 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 134 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7981810 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981812 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981814 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981816 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981820 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981821 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981822 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981828 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981829 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981833 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981836 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981844 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981845 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981847 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981849 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981856 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981860 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981865 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981869 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981872 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981878 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981885 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981894 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981904 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981914 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981915 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981917 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981919 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981924 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981927 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981928 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981929 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981931 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981932 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981934 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981941 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981951 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981953 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981954 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981959 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981962 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981964 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981966 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981971 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981973 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981976 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981990 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981994 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981996 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7981997 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982007 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982017 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982024 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982026 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982030 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982032 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982034 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982038 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982046 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982058 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982059 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982065 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982067 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982071 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982079 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982080 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982089 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982098 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982105 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982107 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982108 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982115 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982120 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982121 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982124 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982146 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982147 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982156 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982165 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982171 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982175 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982184 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982196 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 135 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7982202 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982205 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982232 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982233 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982236 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982251 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982253 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982264 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982268 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982270 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982271 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982272 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982273 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982274 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982275 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982276 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982291 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982292 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982299 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982305 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982307 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982309 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982313 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982314 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982327 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982335 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982336 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982342 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982363 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982364 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982371 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982373 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982376 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982411 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982413 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982417 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982423 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982454 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982465 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982466 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982468 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982473 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982491 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982492 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982498 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982499 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982503 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982508 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982510 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982523 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982525 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982527 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982529 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982540 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982541 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982544 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982545 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982548 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982554 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982555 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982566 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982569 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982588 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982591 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982595 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982597 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982603 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982604 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982606 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982607 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982612 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982615 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982620 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982623 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982626 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982629 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982631 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982633 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982634 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982636 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982637 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982638 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982641 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 136 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7982646 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982650 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982663 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982666 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982668 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982672 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982687 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982688 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982691 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982692 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982694 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982699 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982701 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982704 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982706 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982707 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982708 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982709 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982711 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982713 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982714 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982716 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982717 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982720 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982722 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982723 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982726 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982730 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982732 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982734 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982738 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982739 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982740 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982742 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982743 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982747 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982748 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982750 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982759 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982764 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982769 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982773 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982778 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982781 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982782 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982785 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982788 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982799 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982801 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982816 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982826 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982840 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982842 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982845 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982847 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982853 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982856 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982857 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982869 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982877 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982880 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982884 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982886 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982890 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982894 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982895 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982898 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982899 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982902 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982904 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982911 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982914 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982916 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982921 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982924 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982927 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982928 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982936 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982937 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982942 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982943 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982953 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982962 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 137 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7982965 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982966 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982973 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7982990 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983001 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983014 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983020 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983061 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983065 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983070 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983131 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983133 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983135 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983169 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983170 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983173 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983189 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983191 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983197 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983200 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983205 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983208 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983209 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983211 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983212 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983213 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983214 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983216 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983222 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983223 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983227 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983228 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983229 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983230 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983236 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983237 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983238 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983240 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983241 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983242 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983245 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983246 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983251 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983255 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983256 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983257 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983259 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983262 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983265 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983270 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983279 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983285 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983295 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983304 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983306 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983309 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983322 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983325 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983332 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983339 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983344 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983345 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983349 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983360 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983371 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983375 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983376 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983387 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983390 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983415 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983417 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983420 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983422 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983435 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983438 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983456 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983460 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983461 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983462 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983464 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983468 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983473 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983478 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 138 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7983486 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983487 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983490 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983502 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983505 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983506 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983511 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983522 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983524 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983525 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983531 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983542 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983547 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983548 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983549 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983555 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983561 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983563 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983568 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983576 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983577 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983578 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983587 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983590 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983593 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983595 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983596 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983597 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983602 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983605 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983606 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983609 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983625 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983627 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983634 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983640 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983646 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983648 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983650 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983653 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983656 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983663 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983664 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983683 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983688 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983696 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983698 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983701 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983709 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983710 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983715 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983722 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983723 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983724 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983729 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983733 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983736 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983737 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983742 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983743 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983745 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983751 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983756 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983762 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983764 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983765 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983766 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983768 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983770 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983771 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983772 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983773 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983780 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983783 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983784 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983793 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983804 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983808 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983810 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983814 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983818 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983822 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983825 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 139 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7983827 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983836 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983838 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983848 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983855 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983862 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983872 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983878 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983886 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983888 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983889 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983899 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983913 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983920 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983931 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983932 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983934 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983939 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983954 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983958 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983971 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983972 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983982 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983985 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983990 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7983999 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984003 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984013 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984019 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984020 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984021 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984022 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984026 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984033 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984035 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984046 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984047 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984049 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984053 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984056 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984057 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984058 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984059 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984060 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984080 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984088 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984095 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984113 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984114 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984117 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984122 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984131 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984138 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984139 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984152 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984154 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984156 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984158 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984159 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984165 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984175 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984181 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984184 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984200 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984211 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984217 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984218 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984219 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984225 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984226 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984235 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984237 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984238 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984242 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984243 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984256 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984384 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984396 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984410 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984420 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984424 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984426 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984429 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 140 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7984441 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984443 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984458 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984465 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984468 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984475 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984483 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984484 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984490 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984494 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984496 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984501 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984507 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984514 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984515 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984521 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984528 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984529 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984531 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984535 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984548 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984552 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984563 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984564 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984565 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984567 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984570 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984571 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984575 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984583 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984585 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984590 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984591 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984595 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984608 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984611 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984615 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984616 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984617 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984633 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984637 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984638 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984639 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984641 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984642 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984643 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984646 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984647 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984664 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984668 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984671 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984683 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984686 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984688 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984689 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984694 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984698 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984711 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984722 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984729 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984739 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984741 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984749 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984750 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984751 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984752 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984753 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984754 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984756 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984758 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984760 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984764 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984772 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984776 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984777 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984782 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984788 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984797 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984802 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984808 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984809 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984811 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984815 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 141 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7984816 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984818 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984826 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984831 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984838 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984850 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984854 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984856 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984857 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984861 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984862 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984865 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984866 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984870 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984875 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984882 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984885 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984886 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984889 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984892 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984897 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984898 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984899 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984901 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984906 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984910 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984915 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984917 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984919 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984925 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984927 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984931 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984933 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984936 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984938 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984940 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984941 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984942 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984943 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984945 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984946 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984949 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984951 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984952 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984954 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984956 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984957 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984959 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984961 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984962 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984963 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984965 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984966 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984967 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984968 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984970 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984971 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984972 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984973 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984975 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984976 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984977 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984978 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984979 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984980 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984982 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984983 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984986 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984987 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984988 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984989 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984993 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984994 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984995 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984996 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984997 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984998 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7984999 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985000 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985001 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985003 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985004 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985006 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 142 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7985007 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985008 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985010 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985012 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985013 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985014 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985017 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985018 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985019 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985021 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985022 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985024 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985025 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985027 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985028 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985031 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985032 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985034 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985036 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985040 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985041 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985042 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985043 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985044 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985045 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985046 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985047 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985049 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985050 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985051 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985053 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985054 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985055 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985058 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985059 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985060 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985061 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985062 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985066 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985067 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985068 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985069 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985070 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985071 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985072 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985073 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985074 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985075 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985076 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985077 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985080 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985082 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985083 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985084 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985086 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985087 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985090 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985091 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985092 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985093 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985094 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985096 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985097 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985100 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985101 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985102 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985103 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985104 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985108 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985109 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985110 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985112 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985113 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985114 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985115 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985116 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985118 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985120 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985122 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985124 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985130 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985135 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985136 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 143 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7985137 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985138 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985139 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985140 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985143 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985147 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985148 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985149 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985152 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985153 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985155 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985158 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985161 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985164 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985167 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985168 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985171 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985172 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985173 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985182 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985184 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985196 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985205 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985207 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985209 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985215 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985216 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985217 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985218 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985222 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985227 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985231 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985234 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985236 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985240 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985244 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985252 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985267 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985270 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985271 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985272 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985274 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985281 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985285 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985297 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985303 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985306 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985323 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985330 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985333 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985346 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985351 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985366 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985369 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985372 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985375 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985377 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985378 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985379 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985382 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985388 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985390 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985398 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985407 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985408 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985410 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985416 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985424 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985427 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985428 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985439 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985448 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985450 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985460 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985462 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985463 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985466 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985481 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985482 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985488 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985493 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985497 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985504 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 144 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7985506 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985510 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985519 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985525 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985532 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985535 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985536 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985537 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985538 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985541 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985545 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985546 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985552 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985556 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985564 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985574 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985580 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985587 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985598 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985600 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985611 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985612 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985615 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985617 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985620 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985626 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985627 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985630 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985634 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985640 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985641 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985642 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985643 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985645 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985647 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985653 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985654 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985656 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985659 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985664 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985666 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985671 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985674 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985686 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985687 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985694 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985697 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985699 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985700 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985705 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985708 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985710 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985712 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985718 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985722 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985723 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985724 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985735 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985742 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985752 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985755 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985760 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985767 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985768 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985772 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985780 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985784 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985792 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985795 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985797 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985808 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985811 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985814 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985817 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985825 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985827 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985830 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985832 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985846 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985848 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985852 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985853 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985854 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 145 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7985857 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985862 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985869 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985878 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985881 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985883 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985894 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985902 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985909 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985911 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985914 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985917 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985918 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985940 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985943 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985948 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985949 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985950 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985960 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985962 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985963 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985981 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985985 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985988 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7985991 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986000 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986006 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986016 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986020 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986021 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986030 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986031 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986059 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986064 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986069 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986071 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986079 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986086 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986091 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986097 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986098 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986099 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986101 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986104 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986119 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986126 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986129 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986132 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986140 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986150 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986153 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986156 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986163 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986164 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986165 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986166 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986170 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986192 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986197 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986201 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986207 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986208 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986223 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986231 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986233 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986239 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986252 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986256 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986259 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986260 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986264 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986267 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986268 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986269 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986270 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986278 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986280 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986282 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986292 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986295 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986297 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986315 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986318 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 146 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7986325 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986348 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986361 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986374 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986381 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986384 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986385 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986391 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986393 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986396 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986408 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986412 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986414 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986421 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986423 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986425 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986429 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986430 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986438 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986440 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986451 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986455 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986474 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986475 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986481 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986484 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986487 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986498 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986500 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986503 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986519 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986526 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986535 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986536 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986538 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986542 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986546 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986552 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986564 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986567 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986570 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986571 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986572 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986582 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986585 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986598 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986610 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986616 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986618 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986621 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986624 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986626 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986636 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986639 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986648 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986650 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986657 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986664 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986672 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986674 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986677 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986679 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986681 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986683 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986685 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986686 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986691 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986697 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986702 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986705 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986706 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986722 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986724 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986727 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986741 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986746 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986753 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986756 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986765 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986766 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986770 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986780 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986783 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 147 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7986787 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986792 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986793 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986795 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986797 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986803 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986816 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986819 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986829 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986831 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986835 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986848 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986852 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986856 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986859 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986861 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986884 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986885 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986890 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986893 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986901 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986903 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986904 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986908 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986911 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986915 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986933 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986942 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986944 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986945 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986946 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986949 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986950 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986951 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986953 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986955 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986956 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986958 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986960 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986962 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986963 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986972 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986973 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986982 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7986993 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987013 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987014 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987069 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987076 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987084 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987101 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987110 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987121 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987140 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987160 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987161 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987165 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987170 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987171 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987174 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987178 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987184 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987185 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987187 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987190 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987193 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987194 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987197 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987199 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987205 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987206 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987209 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987210 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987214 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987215 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987218 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987220 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987226 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987231 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987239 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987241 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987243 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987248 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 148 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7987253 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987255 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987256 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987257 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987259 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987263 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987264 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987265 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987266 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987270 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987271 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987279 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987280 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987283 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987285 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987287 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987293 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987299 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987303 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987312 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987316 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987317 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987320 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987324 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987326 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987331 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987339 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987345 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987351 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987356 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987360 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987365 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987375 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987384 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987385 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987388 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987393 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987395 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987398 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987400 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987401 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987411 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987414 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987419 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987427 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987429 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987435 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987436 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987446 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987447 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987448 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987449 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987450 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987451 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987453 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987456 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987457 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987459 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987460 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987461 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987465 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987467 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987469 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987474 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987484 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987489 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987493 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987498 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987509 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987512 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987519 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987526 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987527 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987529 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987530 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987531 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987550 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987553 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987554 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987555 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987590 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987594 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987597 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 149 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7987602 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987605 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987611 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987621 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987628 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987629 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987644 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987646 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987647 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987650 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987652 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987653 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987654 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987657 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987660 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987669 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987672 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987673 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987678 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987680 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987690 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987692 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987696 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987698 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987703 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987712 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987715 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987721 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987724 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987725 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987738 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987739 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987743 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987748 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987749 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987752 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987767 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987775 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987778 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987779 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987786 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987787 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987791 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987792 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987793 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987799 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987807 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987813 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987814 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987820 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987824 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987826 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987827 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987834 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987838 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987862 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987888 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987890 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987895 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987901 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987903 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987904 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987910 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987912 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987919 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987929 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987941 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987952 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987955 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987957 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987963 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987968 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987970 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987975 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987976 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987979 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987983 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987991 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7987996 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988014 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988018 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988022 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988023 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 150 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7988027 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988030 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988036 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988039 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988042 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988044 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988052 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988055 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988057 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988063 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988065 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988069 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988070 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988071 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988073 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988078 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988083 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988085 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988088 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988098 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988100 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988102 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988105 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988106 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988108 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988111 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988117 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988131 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988137 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988139 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988141 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988149 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988152 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988163 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988164 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988166 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988169 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988170 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988173 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988176 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988177 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988178 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988186 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988187 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988191 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988200 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988213 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988234 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988236 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988238 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988245 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988246 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988256 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988259 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988262 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988265 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988269 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988270 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988280 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988286 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988288 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988291 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988294 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988303 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988307 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988316 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988317 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988318 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988323 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988327 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988329 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988334 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988335 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988341 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988343 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988344 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988349 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988407 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988415 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988417 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988423 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988433 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988434 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 151 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7988439 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988441 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988472 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988497 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988499 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988524 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988538 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988546 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988549 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988551 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988554 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988558 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988562 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988577 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988586 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988601 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988605 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988610 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988613 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988620 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988626 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988631 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988636 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988649 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988651 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988658 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988660 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988661 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988663 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988671 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988673 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988674 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988675 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988676 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988677 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988678 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988683 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988684 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988689 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988703 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988712 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988717 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988719 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988723 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988724 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988725 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988730 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988732 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988762 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988769 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988772 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988792 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988793 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988801 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988806 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988810 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988831 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988833 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988834 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988835 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988841 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988842 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988843 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988844 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988845 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988846 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988847 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988848 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988849 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988850 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988851 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988853 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988855 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988857 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988859 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988860 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988862 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988863 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988866 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988868 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988870 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988873 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988878 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 152 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7988879 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988880 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988881 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988883 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988884 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988886 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988887 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988891 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988892 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988893 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988895 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988896 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988897 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988899 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988900 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988901 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988917 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988921 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988924 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988931 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988935 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988956 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988979 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988982 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7988983 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989000 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989002 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989016 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989025 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989030 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989036 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989043 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989045 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989046 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989047 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989050 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989065 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989067 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989070 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989077 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989090 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989099 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989139 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989141 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989142 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989146 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989151 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989154 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989159 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989162 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989164 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989166 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989168 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989170 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989176 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989185 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989195 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989196 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989198 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989201 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989202 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989205 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989206 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989208 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989220 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989221 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989232 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989241 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989242 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989243 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989244 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989245 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989253 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989255 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989257 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989265 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989268 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989282 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989284 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989302 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989307 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989308 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989312 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 153 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7989314 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989325 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989326 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989328 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989333 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989335 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989340 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989350 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989351 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989353 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989355 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989357 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989359 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989366 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989373 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989375 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989376 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989377 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989387 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989389 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989391 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989407 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989409 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989416 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989420 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989421 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989424 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989431 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989433 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989439 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989440 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989443 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989446 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989453 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989454 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989456 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989464 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989472 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989476 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989480 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989482 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989483 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989484 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989485 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989486 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989492 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989495 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989498 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989500 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989501 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989509 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989510 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989514 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989521 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989524 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989541 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989542 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989545 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989554 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989568 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989571 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989579 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989587 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989595 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989596 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989601 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989604 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989607 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989609 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989611 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989613 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989615 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989616 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989618 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989619 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989621 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989622 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989625 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989630 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989631 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989632 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989634 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989635 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 154 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7989639 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989641 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989643 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989650 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989653 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989662 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989665 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989667 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989668 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989670 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989672 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989691 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989694 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989696 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989700 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989704 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989705 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989707 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989709 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989712 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989715 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989720 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989722 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989723 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989724 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989725 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989728 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989741 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989742 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989749 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989753 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989765 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989770 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989774 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989804 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989810 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989815 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989822 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989836 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989839 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989848 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989850 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989854 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989859 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989865 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989869 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989874 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989876 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989877 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989879 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989881 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989882 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989890 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989892 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989900 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989901 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989904 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989913 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989919 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989921 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989924 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989936 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989937 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989938 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989951 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989955 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989958 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989962 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989966 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989967 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989971 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989975 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989977 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989982 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989985 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989986 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989991 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7989999 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990008 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990027 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990029 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990039 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990044 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 155 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7990047 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990049 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990054 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990058 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990061 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990062 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990069 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990070 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990073 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990076 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990089 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990091 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990095 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990107 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990112 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990115 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990128 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990147 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990148 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990180 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990181 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990182 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990185 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990195 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990213 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990217 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990220 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990224 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990227 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990229 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990253 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990255 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990257 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990260 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990288 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990296 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990297 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990303 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990305 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990307 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990309 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990330 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990349 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990356 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990371 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990374 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990385 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990389 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990392 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990393 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990394 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990399 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990418 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990419 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990422 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990429 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990430 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990444 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990448 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990455 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990456 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990460 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990461 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990463 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990464 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990466 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990477 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990480 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990490 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990496 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990498 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990512 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990523 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990528 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990531 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990534 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990540 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990541 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990542 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990546 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990549 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990551 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990554 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 156 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7990562 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990563 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990564 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990565 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990570 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990572 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990577 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990579 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990585 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990587 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990588 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990591 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990594 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990598 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990599 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990600 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990601 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990603 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990607 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990609 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990616 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990617 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990622 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990624 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990628 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990634 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990639 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990641 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990642 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990643 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990645 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990652 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990656 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990662 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990668 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990669 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990674 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990675 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990678 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990679 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990687 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990691 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990695 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990698 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990699 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990700 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990704 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990711 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990714 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990715 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990739 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990742 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990744 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990746 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990747 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990750 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990761 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990762 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990763 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990765 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990771 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990776 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990777 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990787 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990793 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990794 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990800 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990803 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990810 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990818 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990828 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990837 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990851 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990858 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990859 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990873 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990874 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990875 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990876 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990877 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990878 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990879 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990880 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 157 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7990881 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990893 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990915 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990918 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990929 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990930 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990939 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990949 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990955 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990958 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990960 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990963 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990969 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990972 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990981 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990986 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7990996 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991015 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991018 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991031 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991038 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991039 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991044 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991049 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991054 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991058 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991062 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991076 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991082 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991085 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991104 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991106 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991116 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991117 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991126 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991130 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991139 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991140 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991142 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991144 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991145 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991147 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991151 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991152 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991160 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991162 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991172 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991173 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991182 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991186 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991200 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991201 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991206 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991211 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991212 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991213 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991222 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991224 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991235 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991237 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991239 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991245 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991249 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991250 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991253 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991264 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991268 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991288 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991297 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991299 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991302 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991308 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991310 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991312 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991319 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991323 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991324 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991325 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991338 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991341 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991346 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991353 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991354 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 158 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7991355 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991357 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991358 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991363 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991365 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991369 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991374 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991375 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991378 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991379 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991385 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991386 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991389 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991391 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991400 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991404 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991414 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991415 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991418 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991421 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991432 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991435 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991437 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991441 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991446 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991447 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991448 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991452 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991458 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991461 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991463 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991469 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991470 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991490 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991500 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991504 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991506 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991510 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991514 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991520 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991525 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991530 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991535 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991536 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991539 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991542 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991544 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991550 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991556 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991560 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991561 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991565 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991570 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991572 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991574 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991575 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991579 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991580 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991585 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991590 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991593 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991596 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991598 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991607 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991611 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991618 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991627 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991629 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991631 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991635 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991636 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991649 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991651 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991658 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991661 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991662 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991665 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991666 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991671 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991672 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991677 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991680 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991681 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 159 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7991682 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991694 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991699 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991704 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991708 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991711 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991718 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991725 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991727 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991729 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991731 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991740 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991744 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991748 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991753 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991754 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991757 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991760 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991761 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991762 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991763 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991768 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991772 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991783 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991785 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991786 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991788 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991790 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991795 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991800 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991804 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991806 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991822 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991826 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991828 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991829 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991849 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991851 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991853 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991856 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991865 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991872 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991891 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991895 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991914 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991918 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991920 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991922 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991926 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991927 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991928 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991929 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991930 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991945 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991947 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991948 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991951 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991955 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991958 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991959 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991961 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991962 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991968 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991977 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991987 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991988 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7991995 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992000 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992002 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992003 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992004 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992012 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992014 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992017 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992021 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992028 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992038 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992039 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992043 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992048 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992057 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992070 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992074 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 160 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7992081 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992092 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992095 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992103 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992104 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992109 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992115 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992122 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992124 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992130 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992131 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992135 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992137 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992139 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992141 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992142 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992143 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992145 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992153 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992157 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992158 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992162 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992167 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992172 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992175 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992178 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992186 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992189 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992196 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992197 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992202 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992203 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992211 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992227 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992233 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992240 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992242 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992247 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992249 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992250 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992263 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992268 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992271 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992277 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992290 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992315 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992326 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992328 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992333 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992335 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992338 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992356 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992360 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992361 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992370 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992377 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992378 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992387 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992390 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992391 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992396 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992398 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992407 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992410 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992415 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992416 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992434 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992437 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992440 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992442 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992443 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992446 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992452 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992453 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992454 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992456 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992462 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992464 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992472 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992475 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992478 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992479 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992488 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 161 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7992490 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992493 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992494 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992504 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992506 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992510 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992512 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992515 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992516 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992518 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992524 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992527 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992533 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992536 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992542 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992563 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992566 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992567 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992568 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992575 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992576 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992583 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992587 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992595 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992597 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992598 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992600 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992601 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992604 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992610 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992614 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992621 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992625 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992627 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992628 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992629 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992630 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992644 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992652 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992654 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992663 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992665 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992670 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992672 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992674 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992675 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992676 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992680 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992687 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992690 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992694 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992695 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992706 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992710 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992711 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992712 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992718 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992722 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992728 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992732 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992736 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992737 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992739 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992741 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992743 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992746 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992752 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992755 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992766 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992769 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992774 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992780 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992784 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992788 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992791 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992792 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992800 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992804 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992821 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992824 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992826 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992842 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992865 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 162 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7992884 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992893 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992916 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992921 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992938 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992947 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992950 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992952 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992964 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7992967 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993001 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993020 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993042 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993045 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993072 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993078 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993079 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993089 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993098 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993101 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993105 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993114 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993122 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993125 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993136 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993137 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993138 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993139 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993142 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993144 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993148 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993160 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993167 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993170 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993173 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993184 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993187 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993189 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993191 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993195 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993203 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993207 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993209 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993214 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993221 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993225 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993228 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993233 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993242 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993245 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993253 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993256 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993268 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993270 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993271 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993272 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993273 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993283 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993291 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993295 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993314 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993320 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993331 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993334 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993340 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993353 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993354 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993371 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993376 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993384 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993390 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993393 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993398 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993410 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993415 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993421 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993426 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993439 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993443 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993444 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993458 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993469 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993472 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 163 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7993473 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993475 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993485 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993494 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993496 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993501 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993506 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993512 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993513 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993520 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993529 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993531 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993533 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993534 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993535 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993538 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993550 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993553 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993555 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993561 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993562 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993566 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993570 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993571 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993572 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993577 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993578 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993588 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993593 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993597 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993598 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993600 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993607 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993608 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993610 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993614 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993617 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993621 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993623 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993625 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993627 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993630 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993632 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993638 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993643 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993660 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993663 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993671 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993677 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993686 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993687 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993688 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993694 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993697 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993698 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993703 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993705 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993707 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993708 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993712 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993715 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993718 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993720 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993722 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993723 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993734 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993735 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993741 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993762 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993766 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993767 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993773 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993780 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993790 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993794 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993812 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993819 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993820 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993822 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993829 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993831 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993833 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993837 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 164 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7993839 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993840 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993851 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993853 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993858 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993869 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993873 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993874 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993876 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993877 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993886 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993887 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993890 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993892 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993893 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993894 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993896 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993898 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993902 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993903 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993906 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993911 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993922 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993927 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993941 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993945 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993948 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993953 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993954 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993967 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993974 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993979 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993984 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993989 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7993995 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994000 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994004 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994012 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994015 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994018 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994022 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994023 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994027 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994033 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994043 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994044 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994064 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994073 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994074 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994084 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994090 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994091 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994094 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994096 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994102 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994115 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994123 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994128 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994132 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994134 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994148 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994153 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994156 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994159 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994160 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994162 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994163 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994165 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994168 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994171 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994176 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994177 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994180 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994181 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994192 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994198 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994199 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994203 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994211 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994212 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994213 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994218 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994221 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 165 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7994224 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994228 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994229 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994230 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994235 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994243 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994245 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994250 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994259 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994262 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994265 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994276 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994277 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994281 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994284 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994288 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994294 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994296 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994304 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994305 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994314 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994317 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994320 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994322 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994328 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994342 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994345 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994346 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994349 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994357 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994358 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994369 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994376 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994379 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994384 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994386 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994393 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994396 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994403 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994405 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994406 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994407 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994408 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994411 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994412 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994418 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994419 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994426 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994429 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994435 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994446 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994457 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994465 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994466 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994474 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994476 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994478 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994479 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994488 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994496 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994503 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994504 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994510 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994519 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994521 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994522 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994523 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994524 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994525 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994526 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994527 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994532 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994536 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994540 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994544 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994545 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994547 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994550 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994553 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994555 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994556 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994559 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994560 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 166 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7994569 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994570 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994584 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994587 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994590 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994595 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994597 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994602 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994604 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994627 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994634 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994635 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994638 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994640 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994642 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994657 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994659 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994661 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994664 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994675 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994679 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994690 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994693 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994694 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994727 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994730 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994732 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994733 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994734 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994738 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994750 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994753 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994757 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994759 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994761 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994767 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994769 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994781 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994784 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994788 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994795 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994796 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994797 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994799 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994800 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994803 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994807 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994808 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994809 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994812 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994820 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994832 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994833 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994838 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994842 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994849 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994850 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994872 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994892 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994906 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994923 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994954 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994964 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994972 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994983 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994992 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7994996 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995004 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995030 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995032 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995037 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995049 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995052 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995053 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995057 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995069 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995080 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995088 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995089 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995091 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995092 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995101 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995107 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 167 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7995113 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995115 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995134 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995168 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995175 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995183 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995193 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995201 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995202 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995203 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995204 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995207 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995209 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995212 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995216 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995220 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995221 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995222 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995229 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995233 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995235 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995238 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995240 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995244 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995247 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995249 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995252 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995255 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995263 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995266 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995273 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995274 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995283 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995290 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995300 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995302 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995303 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995305 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995306 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995312 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995315 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995323 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995326 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995332 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995338 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995347 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995354 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995358 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995371 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995373 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995389 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995394 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995414 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995415 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995420 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995422 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995424 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995428 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995431 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995435 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995442 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995451 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995452 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995457 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995458 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995459 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995460 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995465 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995468 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995490 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995496 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995498 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995510 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995516 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995517 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995518 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995522 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995529 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995535 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995536 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995537 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995538 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995544 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 168 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7995548 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995549 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995553 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995561 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995563 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995564 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995568 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995575 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995577 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995580 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995584 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995588 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995589 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995590 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995593 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995594 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995601 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995602 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995606 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995610 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995622 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995629 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995632 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995634 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995650 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995654 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995661 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995665 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995676 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995686 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995699 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995716 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995718 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995719 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995733 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995738 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995740 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995742 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995745 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995750 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995766 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995772 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995778 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995792 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995794 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995810 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995811 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995813 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995821 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995822 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995824 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995838 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995839 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995841 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995846 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995848 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995852 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995855 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995859 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995868 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995875 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995879 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995882 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995888 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995892 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995893 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995896 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995903 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995912 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995921 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995928 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995934 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995936 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995950 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995953 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995960 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995970 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995973 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995978 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995980 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995985 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995993 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7995994 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 169 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7996001 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996007 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996015 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996029 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996030 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996033 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996043 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996044 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996058 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996068 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996076 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996081 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996086 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996098 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996099 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996101 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996106 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996120 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996137 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996140 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996143 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996144 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996146 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996151 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996153 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996154 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996155 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996156 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996164 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996169 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996171 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996175 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996176 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996177 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996179 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996185 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996187 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996195 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996204 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996205 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996206 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996208 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996210 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996211 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996215 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996227 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996228 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996230 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996238 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996241 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996244 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996249 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996252 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996255 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996260 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996264 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996266 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996267 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996268 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996278 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996284 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996287 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996289 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996298 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996302 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996303 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996304 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996306 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996307 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996312 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996314 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996324 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996325 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996329 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996331 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996338 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996339 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996347 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996350 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996355 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996369 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996378 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996379 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 170 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7996381 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996383 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996388 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996392 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996393 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996402 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996404 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996412 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996415 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996416 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996418 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996420 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996421 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996423 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996425 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996435 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996438 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996448 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996449 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996450 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996452 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996467 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996468 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996472 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996482 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996485 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996493 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996494 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996496 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996498 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996499 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996504 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996524 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996528 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996531 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996532 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996534 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996535 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996542 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996553 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996567 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996569 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996570 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996574 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996575 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996583 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996584 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996586 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996591 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996594 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996595 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996596 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996597 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996608 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996609 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996610 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996617 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996618 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996629 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996634 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996636 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996641 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996642 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996648 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996651 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996655 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996663 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996664 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996666 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996667 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996669 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996674 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996677 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996680 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996688 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996691 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996696 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996698 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996704 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996706 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996708 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996710 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996711 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 171 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7996713 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996719 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996728 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996733 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996735 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996748 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996755 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996763 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996768 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996773 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996775 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996787 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996794 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996799 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996802 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996803 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996809 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996812 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996818 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996823 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996825 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996838 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996842 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996843 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996850 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996861 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996864 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996872 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996875 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996879 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996941 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996942 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996945 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996963 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996975 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7996986 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997042 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997204 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997207 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997220 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997225 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997229 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997235 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997237 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997263 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997271 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997276 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997279 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997283 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997288 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997300 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997301 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997312 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997315 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997326 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997333 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997338 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997345 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997366 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997371 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997376 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997389 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997397 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997398 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997414 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997415 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997426 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997444 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997463 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997464 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997472 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997476 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997485 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997492 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997497 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997503 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997511 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997512 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997514 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997515 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997519 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997522 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997523 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 172 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7997526 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997527 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997528 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997541 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997542 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997544 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997547 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997548 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997560 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997564 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997567 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997568 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997576 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997577 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997579 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997582 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997595 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997596 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997598 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997600 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997601 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997604 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997617 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997618 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997624 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997629 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997631 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997633 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997636 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997638 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997639 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997644 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997651 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997659 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997664 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997666 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997669 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997699 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997703 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997713 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997716 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997717 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997720 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997722 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997728 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997739 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997749 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997751 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997754 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997760 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997765 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997766 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997771 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997773 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997774 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997778 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997783 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997792 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997801 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997820 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997824 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997827 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997832 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997834 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997856 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997857 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997888 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997903 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997914 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997915 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997920 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997925 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997926 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997930 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997932 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997938 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997940 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997946 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997948 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997954 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997967 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997970 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997987 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 173 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7997991 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997996 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7997999 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998013 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998016 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998025 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998040 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998054 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998058 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998101 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998105 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998108 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998110 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998111 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998123 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998130 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998134 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998148 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998152 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998159 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998161 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998166 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998169 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998173 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998185 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998188 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998193 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998197 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998199 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998203 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998220 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998223 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998235 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998237 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998240 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998253 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998258 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998262 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998268 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998275 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998277 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998278 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998281 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998282 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998283 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998285 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998286 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998288 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998297 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998304 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998309 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998314 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998315 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998316 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998317 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998321 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998324 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998337 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998338 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998343 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998346 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998349 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998350 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998351 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998358 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998361 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998370 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998371 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998377 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998386 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998388 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998392 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998419 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998420 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998421 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998430 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998431 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998433 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998438 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998444 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998447 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998466 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998470 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 174 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7998471 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998474 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998476 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998482 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998484 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998487 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998494 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998497 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998505 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998513 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998514 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998524 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998525 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998530 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998531 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998534 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998542 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998545 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998553 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998559 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998576 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998591 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998593 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998600 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998602 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998608 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998619 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998636 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998641 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998667 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998689 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998690 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998705 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998707 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998726 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998727 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998749 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998754 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998756 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998757 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998763 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998766 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998768 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998770 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998782 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998787 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998810 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998814 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998815 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998868 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998883 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998902 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998907 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998945 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998947 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998960 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998962 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998968 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998970 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998971 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998974 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998978 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998979 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998994 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998998 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7998999 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999002 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999014 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999022 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999025 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999027 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999033 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999034 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999042 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999057 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999061 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999067 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999068 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999080 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999081 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999092 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999093 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999121 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 175 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7999129 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999130 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999133 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999145 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999155 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999156 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999159 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999166 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999169 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999176 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999178 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999184 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999192 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999197 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999204 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999206 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999214 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999223 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999229 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999245 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999250 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999252 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999254 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999255 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999259 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999260 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999264 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999265 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999272 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999281 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999295 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999298 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999308 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999312 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999314 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999326 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999330 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999334 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999338 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999346 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999347 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999356 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999358 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999362 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999364 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999365 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999366 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999369 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999373 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999378 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999381 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999387 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999402 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999409 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999417 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999419 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999423 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999426 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999429 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999435 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999442 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999455 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999462 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999485 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999487 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999507 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999531 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999532 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999562 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999575 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999577 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999579 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999580 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999581 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999585 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999598 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999607 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999611 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999614 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999615 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999618 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999622 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999623 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 176 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7999633 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999634 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999637 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999638 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999645 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999647 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999648 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999658 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999661 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999665 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999669 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999673 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999674 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999675 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999676 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999678 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999679 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999682 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999688 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999690 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999696 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999697 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999704 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999707 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999710 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999738 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999742 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999745 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999752 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999753 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999758 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999760 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999763 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999764 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999767 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999769 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999779 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999792 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999811 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999815 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999817 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999835 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999838 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999841 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999847 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999848 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999850 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999855 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999857 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999858 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999862 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999865 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999873 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999875 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999877 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999878 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999883 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999891 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999898 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999901 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999903 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999912 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999926 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999930 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999943 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999951 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999959 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999964 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999968 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999988 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7999994 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000028 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000029 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000040 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000044 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000048 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000049 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000064 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000067 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000069 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000074 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000083 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000087 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 177 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 8000093 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000098 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000105 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000113 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000124 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000125 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000126 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000133 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000150 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000155 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000157 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000162 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000176 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000177 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000183 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000184 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000188 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000203 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000215 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000223 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000226 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000230 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000232 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000233 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000234 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000235 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000237 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000241 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000243 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000247 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000251 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000253 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000257 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000259 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000278 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000285 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000287 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000289 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000293 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000295 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000296 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000301 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000305 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000306 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000311 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000317 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000329 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000331 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000335 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000342 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000356 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000357 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000360 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000375 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000380 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000391 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000392 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000395 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000398 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000400 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000407 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000409 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000412 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000415 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000425 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000426 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000430 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000436 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000446 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000449 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000454 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000455 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000457 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000459 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000469 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000479 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000482 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000490 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000491 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000493 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000494 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000510 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000512 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 178 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 8000514 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000517 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000529 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000530 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000537 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000541 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000543 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000550 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000554 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000558 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000568 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000570 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000584 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000587 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000588 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000605 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000612 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000646 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000695 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000703 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000715 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000723 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000733 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000738 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000739 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000743 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000747 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000758 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000770 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000786 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000787 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000804 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000822 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000823 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000837 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000840 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000845 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000848 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000860 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000868 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000869 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000870 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000875 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000889 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000906 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000910 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000915 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000917 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000923 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000943 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000948 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000960 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000961 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8000964 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001002 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001003 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001014 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001017 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001021 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001032 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001042 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001044 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001053 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001071 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001084 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001101 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001102 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001106 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001110 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001117 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001124 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001125 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001142 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001160 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001168 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001175 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001180 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001190 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001194 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001195 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001198 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001204 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001224 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 179 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 8001230 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001235 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001238 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001243 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001250 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001258 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001265 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001270 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001281 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001288 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001290 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001296 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001307 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001310 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001315 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001316 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001321 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001347 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001354 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001363 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001368 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001374 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001375 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001377 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001384 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001387 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001400 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001410 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001416 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001420 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001425 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001426 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001427 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001430 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001431 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001433 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001434 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001438 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001448 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001449 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001457 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001470 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001471 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001480 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001503 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001517 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001520 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001533 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001546 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001547 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001551 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001558 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001561 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001562 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001563 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001567 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001574 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001576 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001580 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001582 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001583 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001592 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001597 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001602 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001605 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001606 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001612 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001616 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001617 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001625 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001627 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001629 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001640 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001654 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001656 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001661 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001669 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001670 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001672 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001678 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001680 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001684 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001685 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 180 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 8001691 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001693 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001699 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001703 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001715 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001718 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001719 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001725 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001731 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001732 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001735 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001747 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001751 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001752 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001762 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001764 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001766 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001769 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001770 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001771 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001775 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001777 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001778 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001779 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001781 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001782 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001789 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001794 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001797 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001798 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001806 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001811 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001815 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001816 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001832 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001833 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001841 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001845 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001846 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001848 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001851 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001854 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001856 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001860 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001861 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001862 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001866 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001878 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001880 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001883 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001884 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001887 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001889 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001891 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001892 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001902 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001905 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001915 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001917 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001920 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001923 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001924 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001938 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001942 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001943 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001949 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001952 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001957 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001961 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001963 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001968 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001969 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001970 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001980 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001981 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001986 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001988 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001992 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001998 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8001999 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002001 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002004 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002008 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 181 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 8002033 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002035 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002041 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002044 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002045 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002054 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002059 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002079 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002093 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002098 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002118 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002132 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002135 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002137 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002138 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002140 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002142 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002146 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002156 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002159 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002169 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002177 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002180 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002186 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002190 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002194 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002196 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002198 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002200 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002206 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002209 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002212 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002215 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002216 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002221 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002242 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002246 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002247 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002260 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002265 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002266 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002271 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002278 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002289 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002297 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002327 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002330 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002332 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002333 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002334 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002337 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002346 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002358 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002364 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002367 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002371 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002373 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002374 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002376 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002377 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002378 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002381 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002384 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002388 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002406 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002407 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002411 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002422 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002425 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002428 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002431 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002432 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002433 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002435 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002440 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002441 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002443 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002444 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002446 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002451 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002453 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002460 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002461 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 182 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 8002470 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002472 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002473 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002478 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002481 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002484 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002486 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002488 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002490 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002494 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002503 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002506 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002510 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002512 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002516 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002518 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002528 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002529 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002534 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002537 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002541 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002548 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002552 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002558 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002560 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002567 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002572 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002588 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002593 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002597 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002605 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002606 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002608 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002615 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002623 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002630 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002632 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002634 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002637 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002638 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002645 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002649 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002655 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002656 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002657 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002660 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002664 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002667 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002668 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002669 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002674 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002676 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002680 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002683 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002688 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002689 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002692 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002694 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002695 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002707 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002711 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002722 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002723 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002741 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002743 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002745 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002760 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002769 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002794 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002797 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002799 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002808 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002810 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002824 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002827 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002844 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002848 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002860 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002876 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002882 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002900 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002912 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002913 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 183 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 8002914 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002918 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002919 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002923 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002925 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002929 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002935 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002936 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002940 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002943 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002945 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002950 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002957 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002960 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002961 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002962 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002980 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002983 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002985 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002987 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002991 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002995 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8002999 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8003002 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8003003 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8003006 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8003007 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8003008 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8003010 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8003017 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8003018 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8003019 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8003031 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8003035 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8003037 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8003038 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8015668 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8015679 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8015684 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 8015686 $ - Deficient Proof of Claim with Condition of Ineligibility Never Cured and Recognized Loss is Incalculable\n 7762326 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7785623 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7787686 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7822506 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7871855 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7875853 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7881030 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7886891 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7888124 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7889248 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7894315 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7895629 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7897520 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7897964 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7901199 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7906353 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7907483 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7911289 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7911348 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7911747 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7912327 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7913143 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7913451 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7913580 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7914203 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7914255 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7914933 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7914973 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7915013 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7915017 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7915262 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7915285 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7915295 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7915458 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7915471 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7915572 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7916537 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7920059 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7922156 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7930749 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979158 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979164 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979166 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 184 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7979184 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979190 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979194 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979209 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979236 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979241 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979247 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979253 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979259 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979268 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979277 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979289 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979296 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979305 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979357 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979359 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979372 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979386 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979394 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979400 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979402 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979411 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979412 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979417 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979431 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979471 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979483 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979485 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979488 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979491 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979495 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979496 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979497 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979499 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979500 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979504 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979507 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979522 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979523 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979526 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979531 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979532 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979534 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979539 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979543 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979560 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979568 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979572 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979573 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979581 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979583 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979588 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979589 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979597 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979599 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979601 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979603 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979609 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979612 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979622 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979628 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979630 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979633 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979637 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979639 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979640 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979641 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979642 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979647 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979649 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979660 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979661 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979665 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979675 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979681 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979694 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979696 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979703 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979706 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979712 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979716 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979719 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979725 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 185 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7979733 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979735 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979742 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979744 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979745 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979748 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979755 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979760 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979762 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979764 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979767 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979770 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979781 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979785 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979789 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979798 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979799 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979800 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979802 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979804 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979807 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979812 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979816 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979821 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979829 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979832 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979834 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979839 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979840 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979848 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979849 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979852 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979862 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979863 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979872 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979873 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979874 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979883 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979886 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979897 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979902 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979905 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979911 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979927 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979940 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979943 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979945 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979948 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979973 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979975 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979976 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979989 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979995 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979997 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7979999 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980002 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980003 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980013 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980023 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980036 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980038 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980041 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980043 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980048 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980049 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980050 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980051 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980055 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980057 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980062 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980064 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980074 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980080 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980084 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980089 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980092 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980094 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980096 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980101 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980105 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980110 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980113 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980114 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 186 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7980126 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980151 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980182 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980208 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980216 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980219 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980223 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980235 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980243 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980245 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980265 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980289 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980291 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980312 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980320 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980341 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980375 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980386 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980413 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980768 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980966 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7980997 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981073 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981147 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981149 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981172 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981331 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981334 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981337 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981339 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981349 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981357 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981364 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981370 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981381 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981392 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981397 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981401 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981413 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981416 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981429 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981439 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981465 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981472 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981486 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981496 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981504 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981511 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981520 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981529 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981532 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981535 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981545 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981553 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981554 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981560 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981561 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981569 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981577 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981579 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981589 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981591 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981603 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981613 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981645 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981648 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981649 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981655 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981659 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981660 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981665 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981669 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981674 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981700 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981701 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981705 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981709 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981719 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981724 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981727 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981730 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981737 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981740 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 187 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7981741 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981743 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981748 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981749 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981755 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981759 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981768 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981774 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981776 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981777 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981792 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981798 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981802 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981817 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981819 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981824 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981825 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981827 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981830 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981834 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981835 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981839 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981841 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981853 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981868 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981873 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981877 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981880 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981881 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981883 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981888 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981891 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981895 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981897 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981900 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981909 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981922 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981930 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981933 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981935 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981939 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981940 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981947 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981969 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981980 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981982 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981984 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981992 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7981998 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982000 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982008 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982009 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982010 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982011 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982013 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982014 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982025 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982039 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982051 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982056 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982074 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982076 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982077 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982086 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982091 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982092 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982110 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982111 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982112 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982128 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982131 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982132 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982133 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982135 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982138 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982141 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982152 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982154 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982160 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982164 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982167 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982172 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982178 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 188 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7982185 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982189 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982192 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982195 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982204 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982210 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982211 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982214 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982216 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982218 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982219 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982221 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982224 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982225 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982228 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982235 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982239 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982247 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982252 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982256 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982258 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982281 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982282 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982284 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982288 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982354 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982359 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982397 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982405 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982414 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982415 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982424 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982426 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982433 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982434 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982439 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982440 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982442 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982474 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982477 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982484 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982487 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982490 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982502 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982522 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982531 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982533 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982547 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982565 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982570 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982587 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982601 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982987 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982996 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7982997 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983005 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983006 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983023 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983032 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983033 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983036 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983102 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983106 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983143 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983153 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983155 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983156 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983157 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983174 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983179 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983180 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983182 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983266 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983268 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983272 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983278 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983280 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983282 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983286 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983292 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983298 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983300 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983305 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 189 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7983317 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983318 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983320 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983323 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983324 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983328 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983329 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983331 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983336 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983343 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983347 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983362 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983366 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983380 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983385 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983391 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983394 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983396 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983414 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983419 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983421 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983425 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983431 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983441 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983443 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983444 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983449 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983450 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983457 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983467 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983471 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983474 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983480 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983482 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983483 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983494 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983498 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983500 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983504 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983508 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983509 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983515 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983520 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983526 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983530 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983535 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983539 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983550 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983564 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983572 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983574 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983575 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983579 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983584 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983600 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983601 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983612 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983613 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983619 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983632 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983633 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983641 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983654 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983668 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983681 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983689 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983693 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983697 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983707 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983726 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983730 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983734 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983739 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983740 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983757 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983761 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983767 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983774 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983781 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983782 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983787 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983796 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983797 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 190 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7983800 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983801 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983803 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983807 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983809 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983812 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983820 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983821 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983823 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983832 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983835 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983837 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983840 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983845 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983853 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983856 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983857 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983866 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983867 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983874 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983875 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983877 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983880 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983882 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983885 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983887 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983894 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983895 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983897 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983903 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983905 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983911 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983916 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983924 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983925 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983927 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983946 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983949 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983950 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983951 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983957 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983959 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983960 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983961 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983964 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983965 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983976 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983977 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983980 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983983 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983984 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983989 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7983994 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984006 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984027 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984031 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984037 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984039 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984040 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984044 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984052 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984063 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984064 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984065 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984068 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984071 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984072 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984073 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984075 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984077 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984078 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984097 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984102 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984103 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984112 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984120 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984121 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984126 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984128 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984132 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984136 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984137 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984142 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 191 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7984143 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984147 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984149 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984155 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984161 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984172 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984180 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984182 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984188 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984193 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984196 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984197 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984198 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984201 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984202 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984203 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984204 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984205 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984206 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984207 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984209 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984212 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984214 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984220 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984221 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984224 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984248 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984262 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984264 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984266 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984268 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984270 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984271 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984272 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984273 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984274 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984277 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984278 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984280 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984281 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984282 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984283 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984284 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984285 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984286 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984288 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984289 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984290 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984292 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984293 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984294 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984295 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984297 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984298 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984300 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984301 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984302 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984303 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984304 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984305 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984306 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984307 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984308 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984309 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984310 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984311 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984312 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984313 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984314 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984315 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984316 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984317 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984318 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984319 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984320 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984321 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984322 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984323 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984324 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984325 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984326 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984327 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984328 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 192 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7984329 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984330 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984331 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984332 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984333 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984334 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984335 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984336 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984337 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984338 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984339 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984340 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984341 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984342 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984343 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984344 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984345 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984346 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984347 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984348 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984349 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984350 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984351 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984352 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984353 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984354 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984355 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984356 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984357 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984358 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984359 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984360 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984361 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984362 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984363 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984364 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984365 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984366 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984367 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984368 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984369 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984370 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984371 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984372 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984373 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984374 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984375 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984376 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984377 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984378 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984381 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984382 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984390 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984393 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984394 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984397 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984400 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984402 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984404 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984405 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984406 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984408 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984411 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984412 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984423 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984436 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984440 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984444 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984445 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984448 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984455 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984460 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984463 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984477 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984486 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984487 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984488 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984492 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984506 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984508 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984509 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984512 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984513 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 193 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7984516 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984519 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984522 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984524 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984538 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984540 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984544 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7984817 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985200 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985204 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985212 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985221 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985223 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985226 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985230 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985237 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985241 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985242 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985243 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985245 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985248 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985251 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985255 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985261 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985268 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985275 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985276 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985284 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985301 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985307 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985308 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985310 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985318 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985332 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985337 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985338 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985339 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985349 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985350 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985364 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985367 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985370 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985381 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985383 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985384 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985389 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985394 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985399 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985400 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985401 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985402 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985405 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985409 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985413 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985417 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985421 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985429 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985435 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985453 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985459 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985471 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985478 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985483 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985487 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985490 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985494 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985498 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985499 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985508 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985516 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985517 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985521 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985522 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985523 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985533 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985534 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985551 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985554 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985558 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985561 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985565 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985573 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985575 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 194 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7985576 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985582 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985584 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985586 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985597 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985604 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985607 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985621 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985629 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985638 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985646 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985669 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985673 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985682 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985685 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985695 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985696 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985704 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985706 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985709 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985713 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985717 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985719 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985720 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985728 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985736 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985746 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985747 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985748 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985750 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985754 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985757 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985758 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985766 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985777 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985778 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985788 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985791 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985802 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985807 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985809 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985813 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985818 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985819 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985820 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985822 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985834 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985838 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985841 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985844 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985847 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985849 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985850 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985856 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985860 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985875 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985892 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985896 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985903 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985912 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985913 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985927 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985928 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985939 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985952 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985956 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985958 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985961 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985964 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985965 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985968 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985974 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985978 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7985995 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986004 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986011 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986013 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986014 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986015 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986023 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986029 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986032 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986036 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 195 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7986042 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986044 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986045 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986053 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986058 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986060 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986061 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986062 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986067 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986070 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986074 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986075 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986078 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986080 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986084 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986092 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986095 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986096 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986106 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986112 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986115 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986131 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986133 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986135 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986138 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986144 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986151 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986173 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986183 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986184 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986189 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986191 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986193 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986195 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986205 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986210 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986212 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986213 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986216 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986218 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986224 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986225 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986229 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986230 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986232 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986235 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986236 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986246 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986250 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986258 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986261 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986263 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986271 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986276 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986285 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986286 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986304 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986311 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986321 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986331 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986333 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986377 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986388 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986389 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986392 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986399 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986401 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986404 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986409 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986416 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986417 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986418 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986433 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986436 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986441 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986442 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986452 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986457 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986460 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986461 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986466 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986470 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986472 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 196 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7986779 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986980 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986983 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7986990 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987113 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987146 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987150 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987175 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987177 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987181 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987195 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987202 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987207 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987213 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987228 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987234 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987249 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987258 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987261 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987262 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987272 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987278 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987282 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987305 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987307 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987311 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987333 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987336 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987344 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987350 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987352 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987355 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987372 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987373 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987376 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987381 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987394 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987408 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987413 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987421 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987422 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987426 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987428 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987431 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987434 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987439 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987441 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987445 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987455 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987466 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987470 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987479 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987481 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987483 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987503 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987504 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987505 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987506 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987514 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987518 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987522 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987523 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987528 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987533 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987534 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987536 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987538 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987539 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987548 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987549 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987556 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987557 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987563 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987570 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987571 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987587 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987589 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987592 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987593 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987596 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987599 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987603 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987607 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 197 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7987608 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987609 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987610 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987615 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987618 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987623 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987624 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987625 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987631 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987633 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987635 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987636 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987637 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987645 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987658 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987659 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987661 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987663 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987666 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987668 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987691 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987694 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987700 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987707 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987708 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987710 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987720 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987726 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987734 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987735 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987754 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987757 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987760 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987768 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987773 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987780 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987781 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987782 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987784 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987785 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987795 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987797 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987801 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987804 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987805 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987806 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987808 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987809 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987816 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987821 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987832 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987839 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987840 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987845 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987851 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987860 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987864 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987865 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987867 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987871 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987872 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987882 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987883 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987886 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987898 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987902 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987906 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987911 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987932 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987933 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987939 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987945 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987958 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987966 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987969 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7987989 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988010 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988041 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988054 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988125 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988140 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988151 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988153 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 198 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7988159 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988162 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988165 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988175 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988182 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988183 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988201 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988207 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988209 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988210 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988215 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988218 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988221 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988222 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988228 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988230 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988231 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988239 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988252 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988275 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988278 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988287 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988290 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988301 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988304 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988309 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988310 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988313 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988319 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988321 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988326 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988345 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988346 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988383 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988384 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988386 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988387 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988388 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988391 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988394 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988397 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988398 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988399 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988400 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988401 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988402 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988411 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988413 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988416 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988421 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988426 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988428 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988430 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988444 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988445 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988808 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988818 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988820 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988821 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988830 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988856 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988902 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988903 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988906 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988907 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988910 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988912 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988914 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988915 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988918 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988922 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988926 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988927 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988930 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988932 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988934 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988937 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988938 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988941 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988942 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988945 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988947 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988948 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 199 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7988949 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988951 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988952 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988954 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988955 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988959 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988960 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988961 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988964 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988965 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988970 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988971 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988973 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988977 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988978 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988985 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988988 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988989 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988990 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988991 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988993 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988994 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988997 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7988998 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989003 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989007 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989008 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989009 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989010 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989015 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989018 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989021 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989022 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989024 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989027 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989028 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989029 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989033 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989034 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989035 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989037 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989039 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989040 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989041 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989042 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989044 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989049 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989052 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989055 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989056 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989061 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989071 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989073 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989075 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989076 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989097 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989101 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989102 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989103 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989105 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989106 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989107 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989108 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989109 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989111 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989112 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989113 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989114 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989115 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989116 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989117 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989118 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989120 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989122 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989123 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989124 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989128 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989135 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989136 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989140 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989143 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989160 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989161 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 200 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7989172 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989173 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989177 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989178 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989182 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989189 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989190 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989193 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989199 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989203 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989211 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989213 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989215 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989217 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989218 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989226 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989234 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989236 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989238 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989269 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989270 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989272 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989273 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989274 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989287 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989289 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989297 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989298 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989299 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989301 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989303 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989304 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989306 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989316 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989321 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989322 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989329 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989348 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989349 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989354 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989360 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989362 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989367 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989368 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989371 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989374 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989380 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989381 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989382 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989390 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989400 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989401 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989402 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989403 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989408 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989417 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989422 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989423 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989425 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989429 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989435 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989451 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989461 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989466 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989469 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989473 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989496 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989497 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989516 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989522 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989525 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989529 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989534 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989540 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989543 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989544 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989546 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989559 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989560 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989561 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989569 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989572 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989573 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 201 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7989575 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989597 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989599 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989606 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989642 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989644 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989654 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989655 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989673 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989675 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989679 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989680 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989686 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989695 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989697 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989699 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989706 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989708 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989718 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989726 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989729 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989736 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989739 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989751 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989754 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989755 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989767 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989768 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989773 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989776 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989782 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989798 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989801 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989812 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989853 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989873 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989899 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989935 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989941 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7989950 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990007 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990016 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990034 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990059 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990074 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990092 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990093 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990100 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990101 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990110 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990111 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990113 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990114 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990116 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990117 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990122 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990127 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990131 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990135 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990137 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990138 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990140 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990141 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990142 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990151 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990156 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990157 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990158 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990160 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990168 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990169 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990172 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990173 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990174 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990175 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990176 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990183 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990188 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990192 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990197 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990198 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990200 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990207 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 202 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7990214 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990216 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990223 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990225 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990226 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990231 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990234 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990238 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990239 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990244 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990246 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990256 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990258 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990259 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990261 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990262 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990263 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990264 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990266 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990267 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990268 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990269 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990270 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990271 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990272 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990282 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990283 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990291 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990292 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990299 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990313 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990315 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990322 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990324 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990343 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990367 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990368 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990369 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990379 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990384 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990390 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990395 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990402 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990405 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990410 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990417 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990421 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990423 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990424 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990427 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990584 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990806 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990807 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990808 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990812 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990813 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990815 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990816 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990819 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990823 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990831 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990834 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990835 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990836 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990838 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990840 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990841 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990842 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990843 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990845 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990846 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990847 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990848 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990849 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990854 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990866 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990870 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990872 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990885 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990895 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990904 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990906 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990912 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 203 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7990922 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990923 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990928 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990932 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990936 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990938 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990941 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990945 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990946 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990948 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990950 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990951 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990952 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990953 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990956 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990959 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990964 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990977 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990979 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990983 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990991 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990994 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990995 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990997 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7990998 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991000 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991004 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991008 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991009 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991012 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991013 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991014 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991017 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991026 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991027 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991032 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991040 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991041 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991042 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991045 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991050 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991055 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991061 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991081 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991086 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991088 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991090 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991093 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991094 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991110 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991114 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991120 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991125 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991131 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991132 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991134 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991135 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991138 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991146 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991149 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991150 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991153 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991158 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991159 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991163 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991167 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991168 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991169 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991171 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991174 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991178 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991183 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991185 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991187 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991188 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991189 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991197 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991203 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991230 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991240 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991248 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991265 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991269 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 204 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7991272 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991275 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991277 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991283 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991285 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991286 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991290 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991291 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991292 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991294 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991313 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991322 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991326 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991328 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991329 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991333 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991335 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991342 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991343 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991344 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991348 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991349 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991361 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991372 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991380 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991382 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991387 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991397 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991402 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991409 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991412 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991428 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991431 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991433 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991443 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991445 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991451 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991453 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991454 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991455 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991456 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991459 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991465 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991473 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991477 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991482 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991483 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991488 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991509 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991511 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991515 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991516 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991519 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991528 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991533 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991548 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991553 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991558 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991577 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991588 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991601 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991602 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991608 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991626 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991637 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991644 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991648 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991654 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991657 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991659 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991673 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991675 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991676 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991685 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991686 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991690 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991698 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991701 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991715 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991716 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991721 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991722 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991724 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 205 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7991736 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991741 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991742 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991745 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991756 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991765 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991766 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991769 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991805 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991819 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991820 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991823 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991834 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991852 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991876 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991898 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991904 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991931 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991980 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7991985 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992024 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992045 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992046 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992060 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992080 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992101 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992108 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992110 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992121 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992125 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992126 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992128 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992132 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992134 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992138 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992144 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992149 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992156 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992159 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992161 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992166 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992170 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992171 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992176 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992185 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992187 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992188 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992192 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992204 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992208 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992209 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992217 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992218 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992272 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992273 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992274 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992275 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992324 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992327 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992640 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992707 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992719 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992810 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992815 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992816 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992828 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992832 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992844 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992847 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992852 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992855 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992856 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992859 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992861 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992863 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992869 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992872 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992878 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992879 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992882 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992890 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992896 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992897 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 206 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7992898 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992901 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992902 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992906 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992910 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992911 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992914 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992915 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992918 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992923 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992925 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992926 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992928 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992934 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992936 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992942 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992944 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992958 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992960 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992961 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992965 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992971 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992973 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992982 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992986 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992989 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7992990 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993003 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993004 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993008 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993009 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993010 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993012 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993015 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993016 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993022 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993028 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993033 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993038 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993041 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993043 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993047 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993049 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993050 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993053 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993054 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993055 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993056 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993057 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993059 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993060 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993061 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993062 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993063 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993064 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993065 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993066 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993067 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993068 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993069 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993070 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993071 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993075 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993076 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993080 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993081 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993086 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993094 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993095 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993102 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993104 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993107 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993112 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993116 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993121 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993126 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993128 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993131 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993133 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993134 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993140 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993141 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993143 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 207 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7993146 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993147 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993151 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993155 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993164 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993165 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993185 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993186 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993192 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993201 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993202 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993204 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993210 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993213 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993218 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993220 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993222 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993224 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993226 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993231 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993232 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993240 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993252 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993262 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993264 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993265 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993267 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993296 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993313 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993316 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993321 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993328 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993332 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993341 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993345 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993359 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993368 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993379 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993385 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993386 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993399 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993403 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993404 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993414 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993418 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993422 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993425 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993427 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993437 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993441 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993445 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993460 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993466 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993467 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993474 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993483 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993493 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993497 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993504 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993509 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993514 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993519 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993521 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993558 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993564 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993602 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993605 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993611 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993615 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993618 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993631 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993633 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993642 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993645 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993651 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993654 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993656 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993662 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993664 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993672 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993674 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993679 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993680 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 208 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7993691 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993693 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993710 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993714 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993719 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993726 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993730 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993736 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993749 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993752 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993755 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993759 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993760 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993774 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993777 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993782 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993801 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993834 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993854 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993861 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993868 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993879 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993888 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993889 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993899 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993908 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993917 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993938 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993944 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7993999 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994001 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994002 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994021 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994025 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994039 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994051 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994062 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994070 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994178 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994366 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994395 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994686 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994806 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994847 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994852 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994853 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994860 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994862 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994879 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994882 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994883 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994884 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994887 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994889 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994893 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994894 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994900 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994901 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994904 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994907 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994909 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994910 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994911 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994912 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994913 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994914 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994915 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994920 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994925 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994926 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994927 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994930 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994931 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994932 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994933 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994934 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994935 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994936 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994938 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994939 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994950 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994952 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994953 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 209 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7994959 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994963 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994970 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994973 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994981 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994984 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994985 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994988 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7994994 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995006 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995011 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995013 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995014 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995015 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995018 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995020 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995023 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995024 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995029 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995031 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995038 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995039 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995040 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995043 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995046 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995048 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995051 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995055 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995060 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995064 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995065 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995070 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995071 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995075 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995083 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995084 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995086 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995087 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995090 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995094 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995098 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995102 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995112 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995116 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995117 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995119 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995121 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995125 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995127 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995130 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995141 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995142 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995143 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995144 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995147 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995149 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995155 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995160 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995161 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995162 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995165 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995188 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995189 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995197 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995205 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995211 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995214 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995223 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995224 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995236 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995245 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995250 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995281 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995289 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995291 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995299 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995314 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995329 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995335 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995346 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995355 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995359 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995362 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 210 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7995363 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995368 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995375 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995385 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995393 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995403 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995404 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995410 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995426 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995445 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995446 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995461 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995466 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995471 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995478 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995479 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995481 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995485 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995492 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995495 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995503 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995504 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995507 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995508 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995512 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995519 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995525 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995533 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995552 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995576 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995579 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995583 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995586 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995587 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995596 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995600 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995603 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995609 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995611 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995613 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995614 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995617 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995619 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995624 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995628 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995630 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995631 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995633 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995635 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995639 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995640 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995643 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995646 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995649 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995653 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995655 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995656 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995664 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995667 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995668 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995670 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995675 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995677 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995678 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995687 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995690 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995691 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995694 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995695 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995701 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995710 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995714 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995717 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995721 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995726 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995728 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995731 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995734 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995749 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995752 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995757 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995758 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995765 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 211 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7995783 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995789 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995797 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995798 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995801 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995802 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995808 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995833 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995885 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995905 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995919 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995937 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995974 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7995995 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996000 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996004 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996013 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996017 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996032 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996054 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996067 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996079 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996109 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996127 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996136 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996192 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996880 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996887 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996889 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996896 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996898 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996900 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996901 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996902 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996907 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996909 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996912 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996914 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996916 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996917 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996918 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996919 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996924 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996925 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996926 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996928 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996930 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996940 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996946 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996947 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996949 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996953 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996955 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996957 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996958 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996959 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996960 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996961 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996962 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996964 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996965 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996968 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996969 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996972 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996974 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996976 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996977 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996978 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996979 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996982 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996983 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996984 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996985 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996987 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996988 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996989 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996992 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996993 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996995 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996996 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7996998 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997004 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997005 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 212 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7997009 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997010 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997011 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997012 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997014 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997018 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997021 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997022 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997025 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997028 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997030 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997031 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997033 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997034 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997035 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997036 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997037 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997039 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997040 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997041 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997043 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997045 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997046 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997047 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997049 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997050 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997051 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997052 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997053 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997054 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997055 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997056 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997057 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997058 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997060 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997061 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997062 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997064 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997065 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997066 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997067 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997068 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997069 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997073 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997074 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997076 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997077 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997078 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997079 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997080 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997082 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997083 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997084 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997085 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997086 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997087 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997088 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997090 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997091 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997092 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997093 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997094 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997095 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997096 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997097 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997098 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997099 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997100 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997102 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997103 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997104 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997105 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997106 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997107 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997108 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997109 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997110 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997111 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997112 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997113 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997114 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997115 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997116 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 213 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7997117 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997118 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997119 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997120 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997121 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997122 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997123 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997124 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997125 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997126 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997127 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997128 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997129 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997130 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997131 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997132 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997133 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997134 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997135 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997136 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997137 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997138 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997139 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997140 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997141 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997142 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997143 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997144 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997145 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997146 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997147 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997148 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997149 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997150 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997151 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997152 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997153 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997154 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997155 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997156 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997157 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997158 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997159 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997160 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997161 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997162 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997163 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997164 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997165 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997166 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997167 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997168 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997169 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997170 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997171 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997172 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997173 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997174 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997175 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997176 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997177 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997178 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997179 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997180 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997181 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997182 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997183 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997184 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997185 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997186 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997187 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997188 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997189 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997190 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997191 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997192 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997193 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997194 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997195 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997196 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997197 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997198 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997199 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 214 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7997200 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997206 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997214 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997215 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997216 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997222 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997240 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997242 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997245 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997250 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997251 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997260 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997264 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997277 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997281 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997282 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997285 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997289 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997291 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997292 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997297 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997302 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997303 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997304 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997305 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997306 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997309 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997313 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997314 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997319 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997320 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997321 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997328 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997332 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997334 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997342 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997344 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997346 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997354 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997359 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997360 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997362 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997363 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997369 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997370 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997372 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997378 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997379 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997382 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997383 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997385 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997401 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997404 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997411 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997417 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997419 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997421 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997422 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997425 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997430 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997441 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997443 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997449 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997450 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997458 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997468 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997473 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997488 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997501 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997505 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997506 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997533 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997535 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997545 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997554 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997556 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997557 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997559 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997565 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997587 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997608 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997623 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997642 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 215 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7997649 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997650 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997655 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997656 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997657 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997662 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997663 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997665 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997667 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997672 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997676 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997679 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997680 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997684 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997685 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997688 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997689 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997690 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997693 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997695 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997697 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997705 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997708 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997709 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997719 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997723 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997731 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997738 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997743 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997761 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997767 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997769 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997770 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997772 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997775 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997777 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997779 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997795 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997796 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997803 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997811 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997814 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997817 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997819 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997825 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997826 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997828 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997829 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997830 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997842 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997844 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997863 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997869 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997899 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997905 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997908 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997910 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997921 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997962 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997969 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997978 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7997985 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998008 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998069 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998083 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998104 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998127 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998153 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998680 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998688 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998696 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998703 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998704 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998714 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998728 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998792 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998795 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998796 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998798 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998801 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998802 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998805 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998806 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 216 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7998808 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998809 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998811 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998813 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998816 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998819 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998820 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998821 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998822 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998823 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998827 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998828 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998829 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998830 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998833 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998834 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998835 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998839 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998841 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998843 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998847 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998848 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998849 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998854 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998857 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998860 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998861 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998863 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998865 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998867 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998869 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998870 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998872 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998877 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998878 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998879 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998881 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998882 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998884 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998885 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998886 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998887 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998888 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998889 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998891 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998897 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998898 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998899 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998901 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998903 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998904 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998905 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998906 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998909 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998910 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998913 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998914 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998915 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998916 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998917 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998918 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998920 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998921 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998922 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998923 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998924 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998926 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998927 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998928 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998929 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998930 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998931 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998932 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998933 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998934 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998935 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998936 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998937 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998938 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998939 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998940 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998950 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7998963 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 217 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7998991 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999001 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999003 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999020 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999047 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999069 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999102 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999104 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999109 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999137 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999149 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999153 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999157 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999175 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999177 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999179 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999183 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999188 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999191 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999212 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999222 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999243 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999249 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999267 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999273 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999277 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999306 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999307 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999317 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999323 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999324 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999325 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999327 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999333 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999341 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999352 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999353 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999361 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999372 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999374 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999377 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999380 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999385 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999408 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999425 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999428 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999432 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999439 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999449 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999494 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999511 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999520 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999526 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999527 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999528 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999535 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999543 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999549 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999554 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999555 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999567 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999571 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999588 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999589 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999596 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999597 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999599 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999600 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999606 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999612 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999616 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999625 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999627 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999631 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999635 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999644 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999663 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999668 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999691 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999695 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999701 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999713 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999719 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 218 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 7999721 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999722 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999724 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999725 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999731 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999749 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999754 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999756 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999768 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999774 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999775 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999778 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999799 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999802 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999803 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999805 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999809 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999810 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999813 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999816 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999825 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999827 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999828 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999829 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999832 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999844 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999853 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999864 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999872 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999880 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999889 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999915 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999920 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999924 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999928 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999945 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999982 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999995 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7999997 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000005 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000009 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000082 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000092 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000097 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000111 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000115 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000146 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000153 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000154 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000168 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000169 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000182 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000190 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000192 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000202 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000204 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000208 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000212 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000593 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000594 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000595 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000596 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000598 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000599 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000602 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000607 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000608 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000609 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000623 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000650 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000651 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000652 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000655 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000657 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000661 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000663 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000664 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000665 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000675 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000680 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000684 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000693 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000694 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 219 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 8000698 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000699 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000706 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000713 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000735 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000761 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000803 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000819 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000827 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000851 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000852 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000854 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000859 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000867 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000903 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000908 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000930 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000931 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000944 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000971 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000974 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000982 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000998 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8000999 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001033 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001054 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001080 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001088 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001090 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001093 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001111 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001112 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001115 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001120 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001121 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001122 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001132 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001133 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001134 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001149 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001174 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001178 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001208 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001212 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001213 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001217 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001223 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001237 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001249 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001262 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001272 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001277 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001286 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001289 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001302 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001305 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001318 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001325 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001327 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001331 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001345 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001355 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001357 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001359 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001360 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001361 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001365 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001367 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001369 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001372 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001379 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001382 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001383 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001385 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001390 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001391 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001392 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001393 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001395 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001397 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001401 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001402 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001403 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 220 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 8001404 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001405 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001407 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001408 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001411 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001412 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001414 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001417 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001419 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001423 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001428 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001429 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001432 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001435 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001437 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001439 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001441 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001442 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001445 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001447 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001450 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001451 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001453 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001454 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001455 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001456 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001460 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001464 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001465 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001466 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001469 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001473 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001474 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001475 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001476 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001477 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001479 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001482 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001483 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001485 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001486 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001487 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001488 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001490 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001493 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001494 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001495 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001497 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001500 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001502 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001505 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001506 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001507 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001513 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001514 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001515 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001518 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001521 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001522 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001523 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001524 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001525 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001527 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001528 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001529 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001534 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001536 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001537 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001539 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001542 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001544 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001548 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001549 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001553 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001557 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001573 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001575 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001577 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001581 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001588 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001593 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001596 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001598 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 221 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 8001604 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001607 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001611 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001614 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001618 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001623 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001637 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001639 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001642 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001655 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001659 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001667 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001671 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001674 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001676 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001681 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001682 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001683 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001689 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001692 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001695 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001717 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001723 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001726 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001727 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001730 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001734 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001738 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001740 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001743 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001746 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001748 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001750 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001753 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001755 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001756 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001774 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001791 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001820 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001825 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001827 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001836 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001839 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001840 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001843 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001847 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001857 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001867 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001868 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001871 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001872 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001875 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001876 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001877 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001881 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001888 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001898 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001912 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001914 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001916 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001925 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001926 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001927 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001928 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001931 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001939 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001946 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001948 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001950 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001954 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001955 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001976 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001982 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8001983 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8002006 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8002015 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8002030 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8002043 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8002055 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8002061 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8002064 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8002068 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8002085 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-4 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 222 of 222\n Exhibit B-3\n Rejected Claims\n\nRESPONSE ID RECOGNIZED LOSS REASON FOR REJECTION\n 8002095 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8002096 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8002123 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8002129 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8002131 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8002136 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8002158 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8002165 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8002171 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8002225 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8002249 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8002262 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8002277 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8002288 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8002291 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8002292 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8002720 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8002747 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8002771 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8002795 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8002822 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8002856 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8002922 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 8002989 $ - No Eligible Purchases/Acquisitions During the Class Period\n 7555304 $ - Proof of Claim Withdrawn/Voided\n 7903904 $ - Proof of Claim Withdrawn/Voided\n 7903905 $ - Proof of Claim Withdrawn/Voided\n 7903906 $ - Proof of Claim Withdrawn/Voided\n 7903908 $ - Proof of Claim Withdrawn/Voided\n 7903909 $ - Proof of Claim Withdrawn/Voided\n 7975077 $ - Proof of Claim Withdrawn/Voided\n\f","ocr_status":1,"date_upload":"2026-06-24T12:56:35.888347-07:00","document_number":"111","attachment_number":4,"pacer_doc_id":"039012465705","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":2,"description":"Exhibit B-3 - Rejected Claims","acms_document_guid":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/483906301/","id":483906301,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/64904094/111/5/wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc/","date_created":"2026-06-24T12:56:16.287809-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-03T04:30:19.099135-07:00","sha1":"aadde5ba4a0e4c2f26daf41f829d28948bf9aa5f","page_count":2,"file_size":80451,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.111.5.pdf","filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":3,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-5 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 1 of 2\n\n\n\n\n EXHIBIT C\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 111-5 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 2 of 2\n Exhibit C\n Brokerage Reimbursement Expenses\nBrokerage Name Invoice # Invoiced Amount Postcards Mailed $0.70 Per Unit\nBank of America Merrill Lynch 25F0N11410 $ 1,093.92 1,296 $ 907.20\nBNY Global Class Actions N/A $ 562.00 124 $ 86.80\nBroadridge Financial Solutions, Inc 24F1N09820 $ 25,390.26 18,939 $ 13,257.30\nBroadridge Financial Solutions, Inc 24F7N09821 $ 1,210.46 421 $ 294.70\nCIBC 2025-01-17A $ 242.39 98 $ 68.60\n\f","ocr_status":1,"date_upload":"2026-06-24T12:56:36.331251-07:00","document_number":"111","attachment_number":5,"pacer_doc_id":"039012465706","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":2,"description":"Exhibit C - Brokerage Reimbursement Expenses","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-06-24T12:55:21.571437-07:00","date_modified":"2026-06-24T12:55:21.590678-07:00","date_filed":"2026-02-06","time_filed":null,"entry_number":111,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-02-06.002","pacer_sequence_number":317,"description":"DECLARATION of Megan Todd regarding MOTION for Order to Distribute the Net Settlement Fund; and Memorandum of Law in Support 110 by Plaintiffs SynWorld Technologies Corporation, Tao Wang. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Deficiency Notice Examples, # 2 Exhibit B-1 - Timely Eligible Claims, # 3 Exhibit B-2 - Late But Otherwise Eligible Claims, # 4 Exhibit B-3 - Rejected Claims, # 5 Exhibit C - Brokerage Reimbursement Expenses)(Wilson, James) (Entered: 02/06/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/462598220/","id":462598220,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/477716539/","id":477716539,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/64904094/117/wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc/","date_created":"2026-04-30T16:01:12.646058-07:00","date_modified":"2026-06-24T12:55:22.090069-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"117","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"039012651920","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-04-30T16:01:12.615570-07:00","date_modified":"2026-06-24T12:55:22.035503-07:00","date_filed":"2026-04-30","time_filed":"16:59:42","entry_number":117,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-04-30.003","pacer_sequence_number":332,"description":"AMENDED ORDER GRANTING LEAD PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR DISTRIBUTION OF THE NET SETTLEMENT FUND SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 04/30/2026. (jrobe, ) (Entered: 04/30/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/462577627/","id":462577627,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/477695755/","id":477695755,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"","date_created":"2026-04-30T14:05:21.923534-07:00","date_modified":"2026-04-30T14:05:21.940234-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order on Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-04-30T14:05:21.903863-07:00","date_modified":"2026-04-30T14:05:21.903887-07:00","date_filed":"2026-04-30","time_filed":"14:48:48","entry_number":null,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-04-30.001","pacer_sequence_number":null,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/462538206/","id":462538206,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/477655484/","id":477655484,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/64904094/115/wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc/","date_created":"2026-04-30T11:31:39.337559-07:00","date_modified":"2026-06-24T12:55:21.922338-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"115","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"039012650354","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Amend/Correct/Modify","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-04-30T11:31:39.306464-07:00","date_modified":"2026-06-24T12:55:21.866794-07:00","date_filed":"2026-04-30","time_filed":"12:27:24","entry_number":115,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-04-30.001","pacer_sequence_number":327,"description":"MOTION to Amend/Correct/Modify 114 Order on Motion for Order, / Lead Plaintiffs' Motion to Correct Date in the Order Granting Lead Plaintiffs' Motion for Distribution of the Net Settlement Fund (ECF No. 114) Nunc Pro Tunc; and Memorandum of Law in Support by Plaintiffs SynWorld Technologies Corporation, Tao Wang. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Supplemental Declaration of Megan Todd, # 2 Exhibit 2 - Redlined Distribution Order)(Wilson, James) (Entered: 04/30/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/455561198/","id":455561198,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/470507842/","id":470507842,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/64904094/114/wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc/","date_created":"2026-03-02T13:31:26.788355-08:00","date_modified":"2026-06-24T12:55:21.831061-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"114","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"039012514121","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order on Motion for Order","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-03-02T13:31:26.753582-08:00","date_modified":"2026-06-24T12:55:21.766418-07:00","date_filed":"2026-03-02","time_filed":"14:03:11","entry_number":114,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-03-02.001","pacer_sequence_number":325,"description":"ORDER GRANTING LEAD PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR DISTRIBUTION OF THE NET SETTLEMENT FUND IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: This Order incorporates by reference the definitions in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement dated May 13, 2024 (\"Stipulation\") (ECF No. 93 ), and all terms used herein shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Stipulation, unless otherwise set forth herein. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 03/02/2026.(jrobe, ) (Entered: 03/02/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/455094969/","id":455094969,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/470030359/","id":470030359,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"","date_created":"2026-02-25T17:04:20.658909-08:00","date_modified":"2026-02-25T17:04:20.664998-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-02-25T17:04:20.644800-08:00","date_modified":"2026-02-25T17:04:20.644812-08:00","date_filed":"2026-02-25","time_filed":"17:50:08","entry_number":null,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-02-25.001","pacer_sequence_number":null,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/453017101/","id":453017101,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/467897886/","id":467897886,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/64904094/110/wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc/","date_created":"2026-02-06T12:02:45.447211-08:00","date_modified":"2026-06-25T03:23:22.935711-07:00","sha1":"d0eb49b1640121214f7e69fdc3956c1dafef9bf5","page_count":12,"file_size":167757,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.110.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.110.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 110 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 1 of 12\n\n\n\n\n IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO\n\nCivil Action No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC\n\nTAO WANG, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,\nSYNWORLD TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, individually and on behalf of all others\nsimilarly situated,\n\n Plaintiff,\nv.\n\nAMPIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.\nMICHAEL A. MARTINO,\nMICHAEL MACALUSO,\nHOLLI CHEREVKA,\nDAN STOKELY,\nDAVID BAR-OR,\nPHILIP H. COELHO, and\nRICHARD B. GILES\n\n Defendants.\n\n LEAD PLAINTIFFS\u2019 MOTION FOR DISTRIBUTION OF THE NET SETTLEMENT\n FUND; AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT\n\n Lead Plaintiffs Tao Wang and his wholly-owned company, SynWorld Technologies\n\nCorporation (\u201cSynWorld\u201d and collectively with Mr. Wang (\u201cPlaintiffs\u201d)), on behalf of\n\nthemselves and the putative Settlement Class,1 respectfully move this Court for an Order: (a)\n\napproving the administrative recommendations of Simpluris, the Court-approved Claims\n\nAdministrator; (b) authorizing distribution of the Net Settlement Fund to Authorized Claimants\n\nwhose claims have been accepted pursuant to Simpluris\u2019 proposed distribution plan; (c)\n\n\n1\n Unless otherwise noted, the following conventions are used herein: (a) all emphases are\nadded; (b) all citations and internal quotation marks are omitted; (c) all capitalized terms have\nthe meaning ascribed to them in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement dated May 13,\n2024 (\u201cStipulation\u201d or \u201cStip.\u201d), ECF No. 93; and (d) all references to \u201cRule(s)\u201d refers to the\nFederal Rules of Civil Procedure.\n\n\n 1\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 110 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 2 of 12\n\n\n\n\nauthorizing Simpluris\u2019 distribution plan; (d) authorizing payment of Simpluris\u2019 fees and\n\nexpenses incurred and to be incurred in the administration of the settlement; and (e) granting the\n\nrelease of claims related to the administration or taxation of the Settlement Fund. This motion is\n\naccompanied by the Declaration of Megan Todd in Support of Lead Plaintiffs\u2019 Motion for\n\nApproval of Distribution of Net Settlement Fund (\u201cTodd Distribution Declaration\u201d or \u201cTodd\n\nDistrib. Decl.\u201d).\n\n Pursuant to the Stipulation, Defendants have no interest in the relief sought by this\n\nmotion. See Stipulation \u00b615 (\u201cThe Settlement is not a claims-made settlement.\u201d). As a result,\n\nPlaintiffs respectfully state that conferral is not required pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(a).\n\n MEMORANDUM OF LAW\n\n On February 20, 2025, the Court issued the Final Order and Judgment Approving Class\n\nAction Settlement (\u201cFinal Approval Order\u201d), granting final approval to the $3,000,000 cash\n\nsettlement between Plaintiffs, on behalf of the Class, and Defendants under the terms set forth in\n\nthe Stipulation, and dismissing the Action with prejudice. ECF No. 108.\n\n Since then, Simpluris, under Class Counsel\u2019s supervision, continued to process potential\n\nClass Members\u2019 Proof of Claim forms, calculated Recognized Loss amounts, and performed\n\nrelated work consistent with the Stipulation and the Order Granting Lead Plaintiffs\u2019 Unopposed\n\nMotion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement (\u201cPreliminary Approval Order\u201d or\n\n\u201cPA Order\u201d), ECF No. 97. See generally, Todd Distrib. Decl.\n\n Simpluris has completed the processing of Claims, including Claims submitted after the\n\nJanuary 13, 2025 submission deadline but postmarked or received on or before January 30, 2026\n\nand related work. Todd Distrib. Decl. \u00b6\u00b62, 32. As a result, Simpluris is now prepared to\n\n\n\n\n 2\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 110 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 3 of 12\n\n\n\n\ndistribute the Net Settlement Fund to Authorized Claimants in accordance with the Plan of\n\nAllocation. There are no disputed claims.\n\n ARGUMENT\n\nI. THE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR\u2019S ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATIONS\n SHOULD BE APPROVED\n\n Pursuant to the Stipulation and the Preliminary Approval Order, all Class Members\n\nwishing to obtain their pro rata share of the Net Settlement Fund were required to timely submit\n\na completed Proof of Claim form with supporting documentation to Simpluris, postmarked or\n\nreceived on or before the submission deadline of January 13, 2025. See, e.g., PA Order \u00b616;\n\nStipulation \u00b622.\n\n As detailed in the accompanying declaration, Simpluris received and reviewed all Claims\n\nsubmitted by potential Class Members through January 30, 2026. Todd Distrib. Decl. \u00b638.\n\nSimpluris prepared exhibits detailing: (i) all timely eligible Claims postmarked or received on or\n\nbefore the Claims submission deadline (Todd Distrib. Decl. \u00b640, Ex. B-1); (ii) all late but\n\notherwise eligible claims that were postmarked or received after the Claims submission deadline\n\nbut on or before January 30, 2026 (Todd Distrib. Decl. \u00b640, Ex. B-2); and (iii) all rejected Claims\n\nthat were deemed ineligible through Simpluris\u2019s deficiency process (Todd Distrib. Decl. \u00b640, Ex.\n\nB-3).\n\n A. Overview Of The Claims Administration Process\n\n To avoid undue repetition, Lead Counsel respectfully refers the Court to the Todd\n\nDistribution Declaration filed herewith for a detailed description of the factual and procedural\n\nbackground of the claims review and administration process.\n\n\n\n\n 3\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 110 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 4 of 12\n\n\n\n\n Briefly, Simpluris sent 29,505 Postcard Notices, or where requested, copies of the Notice\n\nand Proof of Claim form, and received and processed 24,159 Claims. Todd Distrib. Decl. \u00b6\u00b64,\n\n10. Simpluris reviewed all Claims Forms and supporting documentation to determine, among\n\nother things, whether each claimant had purchased Ampio common stock during the Class Period\n\nand whether the claimant was in fact a Class Member or was an excluded person. Id. at \u00b6\u00b610-19.\n\n Simpluris made substantial efforts to provide claimants with a fair opportunity to cure\n\ndeficiencies in their Claims. As set forth in the Todd Distribution Declaration, Simpluris sent a\n\nNotice of Defective Claim (\u201cDeficiency Notice\u201d) to claimants who submitted Claims by mail or\n\nemail that Simpluris determined contained deficiencies. Id. at \u00b623. Such deficiencies included\n\nincomplete supporting documentation or missing signatures. Id. at \u00b622. Simpluris sent 117\n\nDeficiency Notices to claimants in an effort to inform them of the steps needed to remedy the\n\ndeficiencies. Id. at \u00b6\u00b623, 25. The Deficiency Notice informed the claimant that the appropriate\n\ninformation or documentary evidence needed to complete the Claim must be submitted within\n\ntwenty-one (21) days from the date of the letter, or the Claim would be recommended for\n\nrejection to the extent the deficiency or ineligibility was not cured. Id.\n\n Brokers, nominees, and others who submitted their data electronically were notified of\n\ntheir Claims\u2019 ineligibility or deficiency by email in a Transaction Report listing the data that was\n\nincorrect or incomplete. Id. at \u00b627.\n\n Simpluris received and processed claimants\u2019 responses to the Deficiency Notices and\n\nTransaction Reports. Id. at \u00b6\u00b626, 28. If a claimant\u2019s response corrected the defects in the Claim,\n\nSimpluris updated the database to reflect the change in the Claim\u2019s status. Id.\n\n\n\n\n 4\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 110 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 5 of 12\n\n\n\n\n B. Timely Eligible Claims And Late But Otherwise Eligible Claims Should Be\n Accepted\n\n Simpluris has determined that 5,868 Claims should be accepted. Id. at \u00b638. Of those\n\nclaims, 5,849 were postmarked or received on or before the Claims submission deadline\n\n(\u201cTimely Eligible Claims\u201d) and 19 were postmarked or received after the Claims submission\n\ndeadline but on or before January 30, 2026 (\u201cLate But Otherwise Eligible Claims\u201d or \u201cLate\n\nClaims\u201d). Todd Distrib. Decl. \u00b641, Exs. B-1 and B-2. The total Recognized Losses calculated\n\npursuant to the Plan of Allocation for the Timely Eligible Claims is $11,281,305.48 and the total\n\nRecognized Losses for the Late Claims is $131,740.68. Id. at \u00b641. The Preliminary Approval\n\nOrder provides that \u201cLead Counsel may, in its discretion, accept-late submitted claims for\n\nprocessing by the Claims Administrator so long as distribution of the Net Settlement Fund to\n\nAuthorized Claimants is not materially delayed thereby.\u201d PA Order \u00b616. As the Late Claims\n\nhave not caused any material delay in the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, Simpluris\n\nrecommends, and Class Counsel agrees, that the Late Claims should be deemed timely and\n\nincluded in the Settlement distribution. Id. See Peace Officers\u2019 Annuity and Benefit Fund of\n\nGeorgia v. Davita Inc., et al., No. 17-cv-00304-WJN-NRN (D. Colo. Mar. 28, 2022) (Mart\u00ednez,\n\nJ.), ECF No. 129 at \u00b64(a) (accepting Late But Otherwise Eligible Claims); Bilinksy v. Gatos\n\nSilver, Inc., No. 1:22-cv-00453 (D. Colo. Jan. 12, 2026), ECF No. 103 at \u00b61 (same).\n\n C. Ineligible Claims Should Be Rejected\n\n Simpluris has completed the processing of the Claims received through January 30, 2026\n\nand recommends 18,291 Claims for rejection. Todd Distrib. Decl. \u00b639; Ex. B-3. Most of the\n\nRejected Claims have no Recognized Loss (10,251). Id. at \u00b639. Other reasons for rejection\n\n\n\n\n 5\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 110 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 6 of 12\n\n\n\n\n include no eligible purchases/acquisitions during the Class Period (3,221), otherwise deficient\n\n claims (4,812), and withdrawn/voided claims (7). Id.\n\n D. Claims Received After January 30, 2026 Should Be Rejected As Untimely\n\n There must be a final cut-off date after which no more Claims may be accepted so that\n\n there may be a proportional distribution of the Net Settlement Fund without further delay and\n\n expense for the Class. Id. at \u00b6\u00b633-34. Accordingly, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court\n\n order that any Claim received after January 30, 2026 be rejected as untimely. Id. at \u00b633.\n\n Additionally, Plaintiffs request that any responses to Deficiency Notices or Transaction Reports\n\n received after January 30, 2026 that result in an increased Recognized Loss also be rejected as\n\n untimely. Id. at \u00b634. In the event such a response decreases that Claim\u2019s Recognized Loss\n\n however, the Recognized Loss amount will be reduced accordingly. Id.\n\nII. THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE NET SETTLEMENT FUND TO AUTHORIZED\n CLAIMANTS SHOULD BE APPROVED\n\n The Todd Distribution Declaration sets forth a plan for distribution of the Net Settlement\n\n Fund to Timely Eligible Claims and Late But Otherwise Eligible Claims (i.e., Authorized\n\n Claimants), in accordance with the Plan of Allocation. Id. at \u00b642. Briefly, pursuant to the plan,\n\n after deducting any payments granted by the Court and other taxes and costs, Simpluris will\n\n conduct the initial distribution of the Net Settlement Fund. Id. at \u00b642(a). To do this, Simpluris\n\n will calculate award amounts by calculating each Authorized Claimant\u2019s pro rata share pursuant\n\n to the Plan of Allocation, eliminating those whose award amount calculates to less than $10.00.\n\n Id. at \u00b642(a)(i)-(ii). After eliminating those claimants, Simpluris will calculate the pro rata\n\n distribution payments for Authorized Claimants who would have received $10.00 or more. Id. at\n\n \u00b642(a)(iii). Simpluris will then send the payments to those Claimants. Id. at \u00b642(a)(iv).\n\n\n\n 6\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 110 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 7 of 12\n\n\n\n\n As set forth in the Notice (ECF No. 99-2) at 20, if any funds remaining in the Net\n\nSettlement Fund after the Claims Administrator has made reasonable and diligent efforts to\n\ncontact claimants who have not cashed their payments, but no earlier than six (6) months after\n\nthe initial distribution, Simpluris will consult with Plaintiffs\u2019 Counsel to review and determine if\n\na Second Distribution of any uncashed funds would be economically feasible. Id. Such\n\nredistribution would go to Class Members who cashed their initial distribution check and would\n\nreceive a minimum of $10.00. Id. Determining whether such a redistribution is cost effective\n\nrequires taking into consideration payment of any additional costs and expenses that would be\n\nassociated with a redistribution. Id. These redistributions shall be repeated until it is no longer\n\nfeasible to do so. Id.\n\n The Notice provides that once the \u201cbalance remaining in the Net Settlement Fund is de\n\nminimis[,]\u201d \u201csuch remaining balance will then be distributed to Investor Protection Trust[.]\u201d\n\nNotice, ECF No. 99-2 at 20. Class Counsel was recently informed that Investor Protection Trust\n\nis no longer in operation. However, the Notice provides that the remainder can also be donated\n\nto \u201canother non-sectarian, not-for-profit organization serving the public interest designated and\n\napproved by the Court.\u201d Id.\n\n Should it make things easier on the Court, Class Counsel respectfully suggests that CII\n\nResearch and Education Fund (\u201cCII-REF\u201d) is an appropriate recipient of any de minimis balance\n\nthat still remains in the Net Settlement Fund after all feasible distributions to Authorized\n\nClaimants have been made. CII-REF is an appropriate recipient\u2014or \u201ccy pres designee\u201d\u2014 of\n\nany residual Settlement Funds because it \u201creasonably approximate[s] the interests of the class.\u201d\n\nIn re Citigroup Inc. Sec. Litig., 199 F. Supp. 3d 845, 852 (S.D.N.Y. 2016). This Action was\n\n\n\n\n 7\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 110 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 8 of 12\n\n\n\n\nbrought under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (\u201cExchange Act\u201d), and Rule 10b-5\n\npromulgated thereunder. Stipulation 2. The purpose of the Exchange Act is \u201cto protect investors\n\nagainst manipulation of stock prices.\u201d Basic Inc. v. Levinson, 485 U.S. 224, 230 (1988). As the\n\nSettlement Class consists of all persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired Ampio\n\ncommon stock during the Class Period and were damaged thereby (Stipulation \u00b6I.uu), its\n\nmembers are located throughout the nation. Consistent with the case law, the cy pres recipient\n\nshould relate to protecting investors from securities fraud. CII-REF is a nonpartisan tax-exempt\n\norganization under \u00a7 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, which \u201cfocuses on educating the\n\npublic, investors, corporations, and other financial market participants and policymakers about\n\ntopical issues, including corporate governance, shareholder rights, investment, capital markets,\n\naccounting standards and securities litigation.\u201d See www.ciiref.org (last visited Feb. 5, 2026).\n\nCII-REF is therefore a suitable recipient of any residual funds in this shareholder class action\n\nalleging violations of the federal securities laws. See Smilovits v. First Solar, Inc., No. 2:12-cv-\n\n00555-DGC, 2020 BL 245619, at *7 (D. Ariz. June 30, 2020) (approving CII-REF as the cy pres\n\nrecipient to be \u201ca suitable recipient of any residual funds in this shareholder class action alleging\n\nviolations of the federal securities laws\u201d because \u201cthere is a nexus between the plaintiff class\u201d\n\nand CII-REF).\n\nIII. PAYMENT OF SIMPLURIS\u2019S OUTSTANDING FEES AND EXPENSES FROM\n THE SETTLEMENT FUND SHOULD BE AUTHORIZED\n\n The Court retains jurisdiction to consider an application for Simpluris\u2019s fees and\n\nexpenses relating to its implementation of the terms of the Stipulation. Stipulation \u00b645. Pursuant\n\nto the Stipulation, the Settlement Fund may be used to pay Notice and Administration Costs,\n\n\n\n\n 8\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 110 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 9 of 12\n\n\n\n\nwhich include all expenses incurred in connection with distributing the notices to the Class and\n\nthe costs of the Claims Administrator, among other things. See id. at \u00b611.\n\n As Claims Administrator, Simpluris was responsible for, among other things, printing\n\nand mailing copies of the Postcard Notices to Class members and nominees, effecting\n\npublication of the Publication Notice, processing and reviewing the filed Claims, preparing the\n\ntax returns for the Settlement Fund, calculating the pro rata distribution amount by calculating\n\neach Authorized Claimant\u2019s percentage of the Net Settlement Fund in accordance with the Plan\n\nof Allocation, and distributing the Net Settlement Fund to accepted claimants. See generally\n\nTodd Distrib. Decl.; PA Order \u00b6\u00b68, 11-15; Stipulation \u00b619.\n\n In connection with that work, Simpluris has incurred $79,619.71 in administrative fees\n\nand expenses, expects to incur $11,246.90 in fees and expenses through the Initial Distribution,\n\nand will incur $14,614.60 in reimbursements to brokers and nominees for expenses they incurred\n\nin connection with mailing the Postcard Notices to potential Class Members or providing the\n\nrelevant information for Simpluris to do so. Todd Distrib. Decl. \u00b6\u00b643-44; PA Order \u00b612\n\n(providing that brokers and nominees are entitled to reimbursement from the Settlement Fund).\n\nTo date, Simpluris has received no payment for its fees and expenses. See Todd Distrib. Decl.\n\n\u00b644.\n\n Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court authorize payment to Simpluris of the\n\noutstanding balance of $105,481.21, for fees and expenses it has already incurred ($79,619.71 +\n\n$14,614.60 in broker reimbursements) and anticipated costs and expenses related to the initial\n\ndistribution ($11,246.90). See id. If the cost of the initial distribution is less than $11,246.90,\n\nthe excess will be returned to the Net Settlement Fund. Id.\n\n\n\n\n 9\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 110 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 10 of 12\n\n\n\n\nIV. RETENTION OF PROOF OF CLAIM FORMS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS\n\n Plaintiffs also request that the Court permit Simpluris to destroy any paper copies of the\n\nProof of Claim forms and all supporting documentation one (1) year after the Initial Distribution,\n\nand electronic copies of the same three (3) years after the Initial Distribution. See Todd Distrib.\n\nDecl. \u00b645.\n\nV. RELEASE OF CLAIMS\n\n To allow the full and final distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, Plaintiffs respectfully\n\nrequest that the Court bar any further Claims against the Net Settlement Fund beyond the amount\n\nallocated to Authorized Claimants, and release and discharge from any and all claims arising out\n\nof the claims administration all persons involved in the review, verification, calculation,\n\ntabulation, or any other aspect of the processing of the Claims submitted herein or otherwise\n\ninvolved in the administration or taxation of the Settlement Fund. See Stipulation \u00b630.\n\n CONCLUSION\n\n For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs respectfully request the Court grant their motion in\n\nits entirety.\n\nDated: February 6, 2026 Respectfully submitted,\n\n By: s/ James M. Wilson, Jr.\n\n James M. Wilson, Jr.\n FARUQI & FARUQI, LLP\n 685 Third Avenue, 26th Floor\n New York, NY 10017\n Telephone: 212-983-9330\n Facsimile: 212-983-9331\n Email: jwilson@faruqilaw.com\n\n Robert W. Killorin\n FARUQI & FARUQI, LLP\n 3565 Piedmont Road NE Building Four\n Suite 380\n\n\n\n 10\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 110 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 11 of 12\n\n\n\n\n Atlanta, GA 30305\n Telephone: 404-847-0617\n Facsimile: 404-506-9534\n Email: rkillorin@faruqilaw.com\n\n Attorneys for Lead Plaintiffs Tao Wang and SynWorld\n Technologies Corporation and Lead Counsel for the\n putative Class\n\n\n\n\n 11\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 110 filed 02/06/26 USDC Colorado\n pg 12 of 12\n\n\n\n\n CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE\n\n I, James M. Wilson, Jr., hereby certify that on February 6, 2026, I electronically filed the\n\nforegoing with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such\n\nfiling to the e-mail addresses denoted on the Court\u2019s Electronic Mail Notice List.\n\n s/ James M. Wilson, Jr.\n James M. Wilson, Jr.\n\n\n\n\n 1\n\f","ocr_status":1,"date_upload":"2026-06-24T12:56:43.524050-07:00","document_number":"110","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"039012465667","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-02-06T12:02:45.422653-08:00","date_modified":"2026-06-24T12:55:21.449500-07:00","date_filed":"2026-02-06","time_filed":"12:46:31","entry_number":110,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-02-06.001","pacer_sequence_number":315,"description":"MOTION for Order to Distribute the Net Settlement Fund; and Memorandum of Law in Support by Plaintiffs SynWorld Technologies Corporation, Tao Wang. (Wilson, James) (Entered: 02/06/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/417968051/","id":417968051,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/431751449/","id":431751449,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/64904094/109/wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc/","date_created":"2025-02-28T19:55:56.208750-08:00","date_modified":"2026-06-25T05:19:22.425294-07:00","sha1":"cab7ac4713329aa97e615da3f18a73bac29825ec","page_count":34,"file_size":135959,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.109.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.109.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 109 filed 02/25/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 1 of 34\n 1\n\n\n\n\n 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n\n 2 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO\n\n 3 Civil Action No. 22-cv-2105-WJM\n\n 4 TAO WANG, et al.,\n\n 5 Plaintiffs,\n\n 6 vs.\n\n 7 AMPIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al.,\n\n 8 Defendants.\n\n 9 ---------------------------------------------------------------\n\n 10 REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT\n\n 11 Fairness Hearing\n\n 12 ---------------------------------------------------------------\n\n 13 Proceedings before the HONORABLE WILLIAM J. MARTINEZ,\n Judge, United States District Court for the District of\n 14 Colorado, commencing on the 19th day of February, 2025, in\n Courtroom A801, United States Courthouse, Denver, Colorado.\n 15\n\n 16 APPEARANCES\n For the Plaintiffs:\n 17 KATHERINE M. LENAHAN and JAMES M. WILSON, JR., Faruqi & Faruqi\n LLP, 685 Third Avenue, 26th Floor, New York, NY 10017\n 18\n For Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Michael A. Martino:\n 19 M. NORMAN GOLDBERGER and PATRICK G. COMPTON, Ballard Spahr LLP,\n 1225 17th Street, Suite 2300, Denver, CO 80202\n 20\n For Holli Cherevka:\n 21 EMILY R. GARNETT, Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck LLP, 675 15th\n Street, Suite 2900, Denver, CO 80202\n 22\n For David Bar-Or:\n 23 BRIAN N. HOFFMAN, Holland & Hart, 555 17th Street, Suite 3200,\n Denver, CO 80201\n 24\n Reported by KEVIN P. CARLIN, RMR, CRR, 901 19th Street, Room\n 25 A259, Denver, CO 80294, (303)335-2358\n\n\n Proceedings reported by mechanical stenography; transcription\n produced via computer.\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 109 filed 02/25/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 2 of 34\n 2\n\n 22-cv-2105-WJM Fairness Hearing 02-19-2025\n\n\n 1 P R O C E E D I N G S\n\n 2 (Proceedings commenced at 10:33 a.m.)\n\n 3 THE COURT: All right. We are on the record in civil\n\n 4 action number 22-cv-2105, Tao Wang, et al, plaintiffs, versus\n\n 5 Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al, defendants. I will take\n\n 6 appearances of counsel.\n\n 7 MS. LENAHAN: Good morning, Your Honor. Katherine\n\n 8 Lenahan of Faruqi & Faruqi, on behalf of the plaintiffs.\n\n 9 MR. WILSON: And James Wilson, also from Faruqi &\n\n 10 Faruqi.\n\n 11 THE COURT: All right. Good morning to the two of\n\n 12 you. For the defendants?\n\n 13 MR. GOLDBERGER: Good morning, Your Honor. Norman\n\n 14 Goldberger for Ampio, Mr. Martino, and I think that's all I have\n\n 15 today.\n\n 16 THE COURT: Okay.\n\n 17 MR. COMPTON: Patrick Compton as well on behalf of\n\n 18 those same.\n\n 19 THE COURT: All right.\n\n 20 MS. GARNETT: Good morning, Your Honor. Emily Garnett\n\n 21 on behalf of defendant Holli Cherevka.\n\n 22 THE COURT: Good morning.\n\n 23 MR. HOFFMAN: Your Honor, Brian Hoffman on behalf of\n\n 24 defendant David Bar-Or.\n\n 25 THE COURT: Thank you for that. Good morning to the\n\n\n Kevin P. Carlin, RMR, CRR\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 109 filed 02/25/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 3 of 34\n 3\n\n 22-cv-2105-WJM Fairness Hearing 02-19-2025\n\n\n 1 four of you. All right. We are here for a fairness hearing on\n\n 2 a proposed final settlement of this securities class action\n\n 3 case. Before me this morning are two motions: the lead\n\n 4 plaintiff's motion for final approval of the class action\n\n 5 settlement filed at ECF 100, as well as the lead counsel's\n\n 6 motion for an award of attorneys' fees, reimbursement of\n\n 7 expenses, and award to lead plaintiffs.\n\n 8 At this fairness hearing, I will consider and rule on\n\n 9 the following: whether the settlement is fair, reasonable, and\n\n 10 adequate, I will consider and rule on any objections, and I will\n\n 11 consider and rule on the three matters raised in the second\n\n 12 motion that I just referenced, and that being the award of\n\n 13 attorneys' fees, the reimbursement of expenses, and award to the\n\n 14 lead plaintiff.\n\n 15 At this hearing, per binding Circuit law, I must\n\n 16 consider the following four factors in reviewing a proposed\n\n 17 class action settlement: whether the proposed settlement was\n\n 18 fairly and honestly negotiated, whether serious questions of law\n\n 19 and fact exist placing the ultimate outcome of the litigation in\n\n 20 doubt, whether the value of the immediate recovery outweighs the\n\n 21 mere possibility of future relief after protracted and extensive\n\n 22 litigation, and the judgment of the parties that the settlement\n\n 23 is fair and reasonable. This is from the Tenth Circuit's Jones\n\n 24 case from 1984.\n\n 25 Specifically with respect to the fee and cost motion,\n\n\n Kevin P. Carlin, RMR, CRR\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 109 filed 02/25/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 4 of 34\n 4\n\n 22-cv-2105-WJM Fairness Hearing 02-19-2025\n\n\n 1 in my view, I have a duty to investigate the provisions of any\n\n 2 proposed compromise or settlement of a class action, and\n\n 3 including the obligation to explore the manner in which fees of\n\n 4 class counsel are to be paid, and the dollar amount for such\n\n 5 services.\n\n 6 And finally, with respect to a service award for class\n\n 7 representatives, first let me clarify, Ms. Lenahan, throughout\n\n 8 the papers that the plaintiff filed, there's a reference to\n\n 9 service award for class representatives in the plural. I infer\n\n 10 from the intent of the motion, though, is that the fee -- the\n\n 11 entirety of the service fee award would go to -- is that a\n\n 12 Mr. or Ms. Wang?\n\n 13 MS. LENAHAN: Mr. Wang.\n\n 14 THE COURT: Mr. Wang. And is that accurate?\n\n 15 MS. LENAHAN: Yes. That is accurate.\n\n 16 THE COURT: All right. So, no service award is sought\n\n 17 for SynWorld Technologies Corporation?\n\n 18 MS. LENAHAN: That's correct. SynWorld is Mr. Wang's\n\n 19 company.\n\n 20 THE COURT: Okay. Thank you. And with respect to\n\n 21 that service award, I will be considering the actions the class\n\n 22 representative took to protect the interests of the class, the\n\n 23 degree to which the class has benefited from those actions, and\n\n 24 the amount of time and effort the class representative expended\n\n 25 in pursuing the litigation.\n\n\n Kevin P. Carlin, RMR, CRR\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 109 filed 02/25/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 5 of 34\n 5\n\n 22-cv-2105-WJM Fairness Hearing 02-19-2025\n\n\n 1 So, the way we're going to proceed this morning is --\n\n 2 the way I generally handle these fairness hearings is to make a\n\n 3 record of what it is that brought us here this morning. I'm\n\n 4 going to read into the record a summary background of the\n\n 5 litigation to date. Then I will ask plaintiffs' counsel to take\n\n 6 the lectern to summarize why in plaintiffs' view the settlement\n\n 7 is -- including the attorneys' fees, costs, and service award to\n\n 8 the plaintiff representative are fair, reasonable, and adequate.\n\n 9 Then I will allow defense counsel to put on the record\n\n 10 their views as to those questions. I will then consider whether\n\n 11 there are any -- between now and then, any objectors coming to\n\n 12 the courtroom to make an objection, and proceed to a summary of\n\n 13 the rulings I will be making in this case.\n\n 14 So, in terms of the general background of this\n\n 15 litigation that I want to put on the record, let me state as\n\n 16 follows: During the class period, which was December 29, 2020,\n\n 17 to August 2nd of 2022, Ampio -- defendant Ampio was a\n\n 18 pre-revenue stage biopharmaceutical company. It's lead product\n\n 19 candidate, Ampion, was being developed to treat osteoarthritis\n\n 20 of the knee.\n\n 21 Plaintiffs Tao Wang and SynWorld Technologies\n\n 22 Corporation allege that defendants violated sections 10(b) and\n\n 23 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by materially\n\n 24 misrepresenting and omitting material facts regarding, among\n\n 25 other things, the latest trial of Ampion. Plaintiffs allege\n\n\n Kevin P. Carlin, RMR, CRR\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 109 filed 02/25/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 6 of 34\n 6\n\n 22-cv-2105-WJM Fairness Hearing 02-19-2025\n\n\n 1 that defendants knowingly and/or recklessly made the challenge\n\n 2 statements without disclosing that Ampio employees engaged in\n\n 3 what is alleged to be serious misconduct by prematurely viewing\n\n 4 the drug trial results and distributing Ampion for a use that\n\n 5 had not been approved by the FDA.\n\n 6 Plaintiffs further allege that the truth of the\n\n 7 defendants' actions leaked out in a series of disclosures\n\n 8 beginning in April of 2022, when the FDA rejected the company's\n\n 9 attempt to salvage the trial by claiming that there was a\n\n 10 subgroup of patients for whom Ampion was effective. According\n\n 11 to the plaintiffs, this revelation was filed by the disclosure\n\n 12 that the company formed a special committee to investigate\n\n 13 improper practices with respect to Ampion, which culminated in\n\n 14 the August 3rd, 2022, quote/unquote, bombshell confirmation of\n\n 15 certain executive officers' and directors' misconduct, and the\n\n 16 admission that Ampion was ineffective for OAK, and that its\n\n 17 development was being discontinued.\n\n 18 Plaintiffs allege that each disclosure of material new\n\n 19 information to investors about Ampion and the company's improper\n\n 20 practices caused material drops in Ampio's stock price from a\n\n 21 class period high of $2.49 on the 12th of February of 2021 down\n\n 22 to a low of ten cents at the close of the class period.\n\n 23 A few months after the class period, the Securities and\n\n 24 Exchange Commission launched an investigation into Ampio's\n\n 25 alleged wrongdoing and potential violations of federal\n\n\n Kevin P. Carlin, RMR, CRR\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 109 filed 02/25/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 7 of 34\n 7\n\n 22-cv-2105-WJM Fairness Hearing 02-19-2025\n\n\n 1 securities laws. The initial class action complaint commencing\n\n 2 this action was filed on the 17th of August of 2022. After\n\n 3 plaintiffs filed their amended complaint in August of 2023, the\n\n 4 parties agreed to mediate in light of Ampio's, quote, dire\n\n 5 financial situation, end quote.\n\n 6 On the 4th of January of 2024, the parties participated\n\n 7 in an all-day mediation session conducted by one Robert E. Meyer\n\n 8 of JAMS, and reached an agreement in principle to settle and\n\n 9 release the pending claims in the action, subject to the\n\n 10 completion of a confirmatory discovery.\n\n 11 Defendants thereafter produced over 25,000 documents,\n\n 12 and plaintiffs interviewed two Ampio representatives to discuss\n\n 13 the company's financial condition, the allegations in the\n\n 14 amended complaint, and the defendants' defenses. The\n\n 15 confirmatory discovery assured plaintiffs and lead counsel that\n\n 16 the settlement terms were fair, reasonable, and adequate -- this\n\n 17 is according to the parties. The parties then finalized the\n\n 18 stipulation and agreement of the settlement, which was filed on\n\n 19 the record at ECF 93.\n\n 20 On May 13th of last year, 2024, the plaintiffs filed an\n\n 21 unopposed motion for an order to preliminarily approve the class\n\n 22 action settlement. In September of last year I preliminarily\n\n 23 approved the settlement agreement as fair and reasonable, and\n\n 24 certified a settlement class defined as follows: all persons who\n\n 25 purchased or otherwise acquired Ampio common stock between\n\n\n Kevin P. Carlin, RMR, CRR\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 109 filed 02/25/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 8 of 34\n 8\n\n 22-cv-2105-WJM Fairness Hearing 02-19-2025\n\n\n 1 December 29, 2020, and August 2nd, 2022, inclusive, and were\n\n 2 damaged thereby.\n\n 3 Excluded from the settlement class are defendants;\n\n 4 members of the immediate family of any individual defendant; all\n\n 5 subsidiaries and affiliates of Ampio and the current and former\n\n 6 directors and officers of Ampio and its respective subsidiaries\n\n 7 or affiliates; any firm, trust, partnership, corporation, or\n\n 8 entity in which any defendant has a controlling interest; the\n\n 9 legal representatives, agents, affiliates, heirs, successors,\n\n 10 interests, or assigns of all such excluded parties; and finally\n\n 11 excluded were any persons or entities who properly exclude\n\n 12 themselves by filing a valid and timely request for exclusion\n\n 13 from the class.\n\n 14 I also approved as to form, content, and manner of\n\n 15 distribution lead plaintiff's proposed long form notice,\n\n 16 postcard notice, claim form, and summary notice.\n\n 17 In a recent declaration, the class administrator\n\n 18 represents it has to date mailed 685 postcard notices to\n\n 19 potential class members directly, 3,489 nominee notice packets\n\n 20 consisting of a cover letter and the postcard notice to known\n\n 21 securities brokers or third party nominees who engaged in\n\n 22 securities trading or representation, and in response to\n\n 23 requests from nominees, 21,230 blank postcard notices to\n\n 24 nominees to in turn distribute to their clients.\n\n 25 In total, the class administrator distributed --\n\n\n Kevin P. Carlin, RMR, CRR\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 109 filed 02/25/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 9 of 34\n 9\n\n 22-cv-2105-WJM Fairness Hearing 02-19-2025\n\n\n 1 represents to the Court that it distributed 25,404 copies of the\n\n 2 postcard notice to potential class members and nominees. After\n\n 3 the class administrator's efforts to identify an alternate\n\n 4 address, 41 postcard notices and 146 nominee notice packets\n\n 5 remained undeliverable.\n\n 6 In addition, since October 14th of 2024, the settlement\n\n 7 telephone number has received 142 phone calls, with 122 of those\n\n 8 routed to live agents. And since October 15th of 2024, the\n\n 9 settlement website has received 2,318 unique visitors.\n\n 10 On the 28th of October of last year, the class\n\n 11 administrator also caused the court-approved summary notice to\n\n 12 be published in Investor's Business Daily, and transmitted over\n\n 13 PR Newswire.\n\n 14 As of the 24th of January this year, 2025, the class\n\n 15 administrator represents it has received 351 claim forms from\n\n 16 individuals, 55 claim forms from nominees or third party filers\n\n 17 on behalf of 23,772 clients for a total of 24,123 claimants, and\n\n 18 zero requests for exclusion from the class.\n\n 19 The Court received no objections to the settlement\n\n 20 agreement by the January 29th, 2025, deadline set forth in the\n\n 21 preliminary approval order. Lead plaintiff's motion for final\n\n 22 approval of the class action settlement, ECF 100, as I\n\n 23 referenced before, and their motion for an award of attorneys'\n\n 24 fees, reimbursement of expenses, and award to lead plaintiffs\n\n 25 are unopposed.\n\n\n Kevin P. Carlin, RMR, CRR\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 109 filed 02/25/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 10 of 34\n 10\n\n 22-cv-2105-WJM Fairness Hearing 02-19-2025\n\n\n 1 All right. Who will be -- on behalf of plaintiffs be\n\n 2 addressing this matter this morning?\n\n 3 MS. LENAHAN: I will, Your Honor. Katherine Lenahan.\n\n 4 THE COURT: Okay. Ms. Lenahan, if you will take the\n\n 5 lectern, please.\n\n 6 MS. LENAHAN: Thank you, Your Honor.\n\n 7 THE COURT: If you will take the lectern.\n\n 8 MS. LENAHAN: Oh. I'm sorry.\n\n 9 THE COURT: All right. Ms. Lenahan, if you will, from\n\n 10 the plaintiffs' perspective, put on the record why you believe\n\n 11 the settlement terms are fair, reasonable, and adequate. And\n\n 12 also, if you will address the fairness and reasonableness of the\n\n 13 attorney fee requests, the cost reimbursement request, and the\n\n 14 service payment to Mr. Wang.\n\n 15 MS. LENAHAN: Yes. Thank you, Your Honor. With\n\n 16 respect to the settlement itself, in plaintiffs' view the\n\n 17 settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate because the\n\n 18 3 million-dollar settlement represents approximately 14 percent\n\n 19 of the maximum damages that the class -- that the class suffered\n\n 20 in this case were all claims to be proven, and this is well\n\n 21 above the 1.8 percent median range of losses to settlement in\n\n 22 2023. So, this is well above that median.\n\n 23 THE COURT: Okay. So, hold on. So, the 1.18 median\n\n 24 is a -- what cohort of class -- all national class actions?\n\n 25 Securities class actions? Securities class actions within a\n\n\n Kevin P. Carlin, RMR, CRR\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 109 filed 02/25/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 11 of 34\n 11\n\n 22-cv-2105-WJM Fairness Hearing 02-19-2025\n\n\n 1 range of size of potential recovery? What are we talking about?\n\n 2 MS. LENAHAN: The 1.8 percent is a median of all\n\n 3 securities class actions in 2023. And with respect to the\n\n 4 damages in this action, which are around 21 million, the losses\n\n 5 for the average for those is about 5.1 percent. So, our\n\n 6 14 percent is higher than the 5.1 percent in our cohort of\n\n 7 damages.\n\n 8 THE COURT: So, what size are we talking about in\n\n 9 terms of the group? Because as I understand your\n\n 10 representation, you're not saying that the 1.8 million or the\n\n 11 5.1 million -- the 1.8 percent, rather, and the 5.1 percent are\n\n 12 not percentages of all class action settlements; is that\n\n 13 correct?\n\n 14 MS. LENAHAN: That's correct. It's unique to\n\n 15 securities.\n\n 16 THE COURT: Well, I understand that, but is there a\n\n 17 range of potential recoveries that we're talking about? Have\n\n 18 you broken it down, or are we talking about all class action\n\n 19 settlements, whether 1 million or one -- or 10 billion?\n\n 20 MS. LENAHAN: Oh. I see. I see your question. Yes.\n\n 21 There are some exclusions, I think, to avoid the issue that a\n\n 22 mega fund might pose to that median.\n\n 23 THE COURT: Mr. Wilson, would you be able to help us\n\n 24 here?\n\n 25 MR. WILSON: If I'm understanding correctly, we're\n\n\n Kevin P. Carlin, RMR, CRR\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 109 filed 02/25/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 12 of 34\n 12\n\n 22-cv-2105-WJM Fairness Hearing 02-19-2025\n\n\n 1 talking about the average --\n\n 2 THE COURT: Recovery. Right. But --\n\n 3 MR. WILSON: -- security class actions in 2023.\n\n 4 THE COURT: Right. But here is the reason for my\n\n 5 question. This is not the first such fairness hearing in\n\n 6 securities class action, as you know, because both sides have\n\n 7 cited prior orders. It's more meaningful to me for you to make\n\n 8 a representation of 14 percent recovery when you're comparing\n\n 9 and contrasting a comparable cohort. In other words, cases in\n\n 10 which the potential maximum discovery is up to 25 million, or\n\n 11 between 25 and 50 or 25 and 100 million. So, what is -- what is\n\n 12 the cohort group that you're asking me to compare 14 percent\n\n 13 recovery against?\n\n 14 MS. LENAHAN: So, the cohort group here would be for\n\n 15 the specific range of losses here that would implicate our case,\n\n 16 which is 21 million. The range is 20 to 49 million in investor\n\n 17 losses, and the average there is 5.1 percent.\n\n 18 THE COURT: Okay. So, it's 5.1. So, your point is\n\n 19 that you're about triple what -- the average recovery for that\n\n 20 group or cohort of securities class action recoveries?\n\n 21 MS. LENAHAN: Yes. That's correct.\n\n 22 THE COURT: Okay. I think we've -- I've got my\n\n 23 answer. Okay. Go ahead, Ms. Lenahan.\n\n 24 MS. LENAHAN: Yes. So, in addition to that excellent\n\n 25 recovery, this case was settled primarily on the basis of\n\n\n Kevin P. Carlin, RMR, CRR\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 109 filed 02/25/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 13 of 34\n 13\n\n 22-cv-2105-WJM Fairness Hearing 02-19-2025\n\n\n 1 Ampio's financial condition. Ampio was in dire straits before\n\n 2 the mediation. After we filed our amended complaint, it was\n\n 3 clear that there was not going to be a lot of money left over to\n\n 4 satisfy a judgment. So, in light of that, lead counsel worked\n\n 5 very quickly with defense counsel to come to a resolution that\n\n 6 worked for both parties and preserve the available cash and\n\n 7 insurance proceeds for the class, who would otherwise have\n\n 8 received nothing.\n\n 9 THE COURT: All right. And I understand that from\n\n 10 your filings. I should tell you my initial reaction was, oh\n\n 11 boy, you had -- you saw where -- that the coffers were running\n\n 12 thin quickly, and that we're looking at some kind of fire sale\n\n 13 settlement on the part of the plaintiffs. So, you need to\n\n 14 convince me that that's not the case.\n\n 15 MS. LENAHAN: Oh. Thank you, Your Honor. So, here,\n\n 16 we had a case where we felt pretty strong on liability, because\n\n 17 the -- because of the special committee's release of information\n\n 18 concerning the conduct of the Ampion trial that was going on and\n\n 19 the unauthorized distribution of the Ampion, the subject drug.\n\n 20 So, we felt confident that going forward, motions to dismiss --\n\n 21 that we would get past the motions to dismiss. But we were\n\n 22 concerned that we would be in a worse position as time went on\n\n 23 and defense counsel and the insurance carrier spent money\n\n 24 defending the motions to dismiss, there would be even less money\n\n 25 to recover.\n\n\n Kevin P. Carlin, RMR, CRR\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 109 filed 02/25/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 14 of 34\n 14\n\n 22-cv-2105-WJM Fairness Hearing 02-19-2025\n\n\n 1 THE COURT: So, I'm assuming, while your case is\n\n 2 pending, given the nature of the allegations against the\n\n 3 directors and officers, that there must have been a slew of\n\n 4 derivative shareholder suits being filed or had been filed; is\n\n 5 that accurate?\n\n 6 MS. LENAHAN: That's correct.\n\n 7 THE COURT: Okay. So, you're looking at a vanishing\n\n 8 pie in terms of potential source for recovery funds?\n\n 9 MS. LENAHAN: Exactly.\n\n 10 THE COURT: All right. How much advanced or behind\n\n 11 this litigation were those derivative shareholder actions?\n\n 12 MS. LENAHAN: I believe they were a bit behind us.\n\n 13 But I'm not sure what the conclusion of those -- of those cases\n\n 14 were, or if they're still ongoing.\n\n 15 THE COURT: Okay. Go ahead.\n\n 16 MS. LENAHAN: So, at this point in the settlement\n\n 17 approval process, one of the most -- the most important factor\n\n 18 that Courts look to is the reaction of the class. In this case,\n\n 19 the reaction has been excellent. As Your Honor noted, there\n\n 20 have been no requests for dissolution and no objections to the\n\n 21 settlement or any aspect of it.\n\n 22 In addition, the claims administrator has received over\n\n 23 24,000 claim forms from potential class members and nominees,\n\n 24 and this represents about 95 percent of the total number of\n\n 25 postcard notices that were mailed out, which in our experience\n\n\n Kevin P. Carlin, RMR, CRR\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 109 filed 02/25/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 15 of 34\n 15\n\n 22-cv-2105-WJM Fairness Hearing 02-19-2025\n\n\n 1 is an extraordinary result. It's typically a 20 to 30 percent\n\n 2 participation rate. So, the class reaction here strongly favors\n\n 3 settlement.\n\n 4 I will go through the four factors that the Tenth\n\n 5 Circuit typically looks to as well, and that is -- those overlap\n\n 6 with rule 23(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Here,\n\n 7 the first factor is whether the proposed settlement was fairly\n\n 8 and honestly negotiated. Here, I think there can be no question\n\n 9 that it was fairly and honestly negotiated. The parties\n\n 10 attended mediation with Robert Meyer, a very experienced\n\n 11 mediator. It was an arm's length negotiation preceded by the\n\n 12 exchange of mediation statements. The parties came to a\n\n 13 settlement in -- an agreement in principle during the mediation,\n\n 14 subject to defendants providing confirmatory discovery, which\n\n 15 included two witness interviews.\n\n 16 THE COURT: Who were these interviewees?\n\n 17 MS. LENAHAN: I don't want to speak out of turn,\n\n 18 because I believe it's confidential at this time, but we --\n\n 19 THE COURT: Well, why don't you give me a title or\n\n 20 capacity or position that they held.\n\n 21 MS. LENAHAN: Yes. So, one of them was a board member\n\n 22 who provided information for us on the liability aspects of the\n\n 23 case. And another one, I'm not positive of their title, but\n\n 24 they provided information on Ampio's financial position.\n\n 25 THE COURT: And is their identity confidential because\n\n\n Kevin P. Carlin, RMR, CRR\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 109 filed 02/25/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 16 of 34\n 16\n\n 22-cv-2105-WJM Fairness Hearing 02-19-2025\n\n\n 1 of the SEC investigation, or why is it that you can't share that\n\n 2 with us?\n\n 3 MS. LENAHAN: It was confidential pursuant to the\n\n 4 mediation confidentiality agreement. So, I'm not at liberty to\n\n 5 share it. I'm not sure if defendants are at this time.\n\n 6 THE COURT: Okay. Go ahead.\n\n 7 MS. LENAHAN: So, the second factor -- or, sorry. So\n\n 8 when we received the confirmatory discovery and we had the\n\n 9 interviews with those two individuals, we were able to review\n\n 10 about over 25,000 documents. And part of the reason we did such\n\n 11 a thorough review is because we felt strongly about liability in\n\n 12 this case. So, we wanted to make sure that given what we\n\n 13 thought was a case that we could prevail if we went to trial, we\n\n 14 wanted to make sure that the facts behind the scenes align with\n\n 15 our -- align with what we knew to be true, and whether there\n\n 16 were any facts there that would suggest that this is not an\n\n 17 appropriate settlement number.\n\n 18 We did not -- we did not find any evidence that the\n\n 19 settlement number was too low given the information that we had\n\n 20 and considering defendants' financial position. So, from there,\n\n 21 we negotiated the settlement stipulation, and we believe that\n\n 22 this was negotiated fairly and honestly.\n\n 23 With respect to the second factor, whether serious\n\n 24 questions of law and fact exist placing the ultimate outcome of\n\n 25 litigation in doubt, certainly in defendants' view, there are\n\n\n Kevin P. Carlin, RMR, CRR\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 109 filed 02/25/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 17 of 34\n 17\n\n 22-cv-2105-WJM Fairness Hearing 02-19-2025\n\n\n 1 questions of law and fact that place the ultimate outcome of\n\n 2 litigation in doubt. None of their defenses are on the public\n\n 3 record, but they were all submitted in the mediation statements\n\n 4 and at mediation. And I can tell big picture --\n\n 5 THE COURT: Which you're not privy to?\n\n 6 MS. LENAHAN: Which I am not -- I am not able to\n\n 7 describe the defenses in detail at this time, but I can say that\n\n 8 our understanding -- and this is consistent with these cases in\n\n 9 general -- is that defendants likely would have challenged the\n\n 10 materiality of some of the statements. In particular,\n\n 11 statements with respect to Ampio's code of ethics, in terms of\n\n 12 their following ethical principles and abiding by law.\n\n 13 Defendants would likely challenge the materiality of that\n\n 14 statement.\n\n 15 In addition to that, defendants also would likely argue\n\n 16 that some statements are forward-looking, and protected by the\n\n 17 PSLRA safe harbor provision. And defendants also had a myriad\n\n 18 likely scienter defenses. For example, the special committee\n\n 19 that disclosed the issues with respect to the Ampion trial and\n\n 20 the unauthorized use said that no current director -- current\n\n 21 executives were involved. So, a few of our defendants are\n\n 22 current executives. So, they -- so, their scienter is a bit --\n\n 23 not as clearcut as some other defendants, for example.\n\n 24 Our understanding is that defendants would also likely\n\n 25 go after loss causation. We don't think this would be\n\n\n Kevin P. Carlin, RMR, CRR\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 109 filed 02/25/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 18 of 34\n 18\n\n 22-cv-2105-WJM Fairness Hearing 02-19-2025\n\n\n 1 successful at the motion to dismiss stage, but it's possible at\n\n 2 summary judgment one of our -- one of our loss causation events\n\n 3 gets kicked out, and then that affects the damages.\n\n 4 THE COURT: So, everything you just told me about how\n\n 5 you're speculating what the defendants' defenses would be is a\n\n 6 product of the fact that this case never advanced to the point\n\n 7 that there was any motions practice; isn't that correct?\n\n 8 MS. LENAHAN: That is correct.\n\n 9 THE COURT: And yet you didn't even get to the point\n\n 10 where there was any pretrial discovery.\n\n 11 MS. LENAHAN: That is correct. We did not have\n\n 12 pretrial discovery.\n\n 13 THE COURT: Did you even have a -- did we have a\n\n 14 scheduling order entered in this case?\n\n 15 MS. LENAHAN: I don't believe so, because the\n\n 16 discovery stay that the PSLRA requires was in place. So, I\n\n 17 don't believe we had a schedule outside of the motion to dismiss\n\n 18 briefing schedule.\n\n 19 THE COURT: Okay. So, this is very, very early in the\n\n 20 litigation?\n\n 21 MS. LENAHAN: Yes.\n\n 22 THE COURT: Go ahead.\n\n 23 MS. LENAHAN: So, with respect to the third factor,\n\n 24 whether the value of an immediate recovery outweighs the mere\n\n 25 possibility of future relief after protracted and expensive\n\n\n Kevin P. Carlin, RMR, CRR\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 109 filed 02/25/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 19 of 34\n 19\n\n 22-cv-2105-WJM Fairness Hearing 02-19-2025\n\n\n 1 litigation, here we think this factor strongly favors\n\n 2 settlement. As previously discussed, Ampio was in dire straits,\n\n 3 and the available insurance proceeds were rapidly depleting\n\n 4 because of the other litigation it was facing: two derivative\n\n 5 cases, state court securities case, and an SEC investigation.\n\n 6 So, we assume that additional -- going forward there\n\n 7 would be multiple motions to dismiss filed, because many of the\n\n 8 defendants have different counsel. So, we would have to respond\n\n 9 to those, and Ampio and the insurance companies would have to\n\n 10 pay money to defend those motions to dismiss, which would\n\n 11 further diminish the amount of money available. So, we believe\n\n 12 here that given the financial condition and the other -- some of\n\n 13 the other issues that face liability here, that the immediate\n\n 14 recovery far outweighs the value of letting this case go on\n\n 15 longer.\n\n 16 With respect to number four, the judgment of the\n\n 17 parties that the settlement is fair and reasonable, certainly on\n\n 18 plaintiffs' side, lead counsel and plaintiffs believe the\n\n 19 settlement is fair and reasonable. And I will say our --\n\n 20 Mr. Wang and his company lost over $3.4 million on their Ampio\n\n 21 transactions, and, you know, that is larger than the settlement\n\n 22 in this case. And so, you know, he and we thought long and hard\n\n 23 about this settlement number, and, you know, the fact that we\n\n 24 stand by it in light of his large losses weighs in favor of the\n\n 25 settlement.\n\n\n Kevin P. Carlin, RMR, CRR\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 109 filed 02/25/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 20 of 34\n 20\n\n 22-cv-2105-WJM Fairness Hearing 02-19-2025\n\n\n 1 THE COURT: All right. Before you go on to the\n\n 2 attorneys' fees, let me ask you, there was a sentence in the\n\n 3 settlement agreement that I think even as of right now, I don't\n\n 4 fully understand, and I need you to explain it to me. The\n\n 5 settlement agreement states that the plan of allocation for the\n\n 6 remaining net settlement fund is not an essential term of the\n\n 7 settlement agreement, and does not affect the validity or\n\n 8 finality of the proposed settlement. Can you please explain\n\n 9 that to me.\n\n 10 MS. LENAHAN: Could you point me to the paragraph\n\n 11 number? I'm sorry.\n\n 12 THE COURT: It is 23.\n\n 13 MS. LENAHAN: Oh. Yes. So, occasionally, not\n\n 14 usually, but occasionally, plans of allocations are tweaked by\n\n 15 the Court. Sometimes -- or sometimes objections will make --\n\n 16 will result in changes being made to the plan of allocation.\n\n 17 The plan of allocation's fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy\n\n 18 is separate from the settlement itself. And that is how it is\n\n 19 usually done in these cases, because my understanding is that we\n\n 20 want to have some flexibility with the plan of allocation,\n\n 21 because occasionally unanticipated issues arise that require the\n\n 22 parties to go back to the drawing board.\n\n 23 THE COURT: All right. So, this was an anticipatory\n\n 24 clause in case I wanted to red ink some of the terms of the plan\n\n 25 of allocation? Is that what you're telling me?\n\n\n Kevin P. Carlin, RMR, CRR\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 109 filed 02/25/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 21 of 34\n 21\n\n 22-cv-2105-WJM Fairness Hearing 02-19-2025\n\n\n 1 MS. LENAHAN: Yes.\n\n 2 THE COURT: So, I don't know how typical that is. I\n\n 3 mean, one of the things that we have to -- we federal judges\n\n 4 when we're reviewing these settlements have to consider is\n\n 5 there's a line beyond which we can't go in terms of rewriting\n\n 6 the settlement agreement, because as you know, the controlling\n\n 7 law is that I get -- I have to decide up or down based on the\n\n 8 agreement proposed to me, and I don't get to rewrite it and\n\n 9 enforce upon the parties a settlement that they had not arrived\n\n 10 at. That's clear, binding, black letter law.\n\n 11 So, actually, it's not the way you characterized it, at\n\n 12 least in my experience in this district. And in comparable and\n\n 13 similar settlement agreements, this is not a typical provision.\n\n 14 But now that you've explained it, I understand it, and I\n\n 15 actually -- I can tell you, I would not make any changes. I\n\n 16 think the -- actually, the plan of allocation is a very\n\n 17 equitable one, and is among one of the better plans of\n\n 18 allocation that I've seen in these types of cases.\n\n 19 All right. So, go ahead, and let's talk about the\n\n 20 attorneys' fees and costs motion.\n\n 21 MS. LENAHAN: Thank you, Your Honor. And I'm glad\n\n 22 that the plan of allocation looked good. It's important to us\n\n 23 that it be equitable. So, thank you.\n\n 24 With respect to the fee motion, lead counsel is seeking\n\n 25 an approval of an award of attorneys' fees in the amount of\n\n\n Kevin P. Carlin, RMR, CRR\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 109 filed 02/25/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 22 of 34\n 22\n\n 22-cv-2105-WJM Fairness Hearing 02-19-2025\n\n\n 1 28 percent of the settlement fund. That is about $840,000 plus\n\n 2 accrued interest. Lead counsel is also seeking reimbursement of\n\n 3 expenses in the amount of $66,475.24 that were reasonably\n\n 4 incurred during the course of the action.\n\n 5 With respect to the factors that go to determining\n\n 6 whether the percentage requested is reasonable, Courts in this\n\n 7 Circuit apply the Johnson factors --\n\n 8 THE COURT: Right. Which I am very, very familiar\n\n 9 with, and you don't have to repeat. Let me ask you, how much\n\n 10 should I consider the fact that the reasonableness of the -- of\n\n 11 this amount of the 800 and the 40,000-dollar fee request, that\n\n 12 the reasonableness of it is being argued as it compares and\n\n 13 contrasts with your lodestar, which is calculated based on East\n\n 14 Coast hourly rates, and most definitely not Denver hourly rates?\n\n 15 I mean, I can tell you paralegals in Denver do not bill\n\n 16 at 375 an hour. All right? So, there's a considerable\n\n 17 disparity between the range of fees for all levels, partners,\n\n 18 associates, law clerks, paralegals that's in your motion, and\n\n 19 that make up -- like I said, your lodestar, what is it? 756k,\n\n 20 and that's your main point in terms of, as I read your papers,\n\n 21 your main point, the reasonableness of the 840 is that that\n\n 22 represents only 1.11 -- 1.11 multiplier. But how much should I\n\n 23 factor into the analysis the fact that these are hourly rates\n\n 24 that are completely out of sync with the Denver market?\n\n 25 MS. LENAHAN: Well, I would say to that, Your Honor,\n\n\n Kevin P. Carlin, RMR, CRR\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 109 filed 02/25/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 23 of 34\n 23\n\n 22-cv-2105-WJM Fairness Hearing 02-19-2025\n\n\n 1 that in this Circuit, the lodestar cross check is not required,\n\n 2 though I understand that is something that Courts want to look\n\n 3 at. In the recent Tenth Circuit case Voulgaris versus Array\n\n 4 Biopharmaceuticals, the Tenth Circuit was presented with this\n\n 5 issue, and it reaffirmed that a lodestar cross check is not\n\n 6 required.\n\n 7 And it also -- it also noted that with similar rates in\n\n 8 that case, was about $455 an hour for associates to 1,050 for\n\n 9 partners, which is very similar to what we have here. The Court\n\n 10 noted that while the rates are high for the Denver market, they\n\n 11 are consistent with those approved in similar cases. And I\n\n 12 submit that that is the case here.\n\n 13 THE COURT: Well, of course the Johnson factors, you\n\n 14 know, they're decades old and have spawned hundreds of cases --\n\n 15 that decision spawned hundreds of decisions analyzing and\n\n 16 interpreting how it should be applied. And it is true that no\n\n 17 one factor is dispositive, but from my experience, and how I've\n\n 18 ruled previously, the lodestar is a big factor. It's a\n\n 19 weightier factor than a host of the other ones, and that was\n\n 20 the -- that's what I was getting at.\n\n 21 The concern I had here was the -- not even so much for\n\n 22 the partner level. It's the law clerks and paralegals at 350,\n\n 23 375. That's what I think is completely disconnected from the\n\n 24 Denver reality. But in any event, apart from the cross check\n\n 25 with the lodestar, what would you say is the most -- one or two\n\n\n Kevin P. Carlin, RMR, CRR\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 109 filed 02/25/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 24 of 34\n 24\n\n 22-cv-2105-WJM Fairness Hearing 02-19-2025\n\n\n 1 factors that I should be looking at in terms of assessing the\n\n 2 appropriateness of the 840,000 award?\n\n 3 MS. LENAHAN: I would say that one of the most\n\n 4 important factors would be the fact that the fee in this case is\n\n 5 contingent. In securities cases, we're subject to what I'm\n\n 6 pretty sure is the highest pleading standard of any civil\n\n 7 litigation. I'm not aware of a higher one out there. So, we\n\n 8 take on a great deal of risk taking on these securities cases.\n\n 9 And particularly in a case like Ampio, where in our\n\n 10 view, the liability is strong, the damages just aren't that\n\n 11 high. And in order to, you know, incentivize firms to take on\n\n 12 cases that may not be mega fund cases, but where investors were\n\n 13 really harmed, this -- you know, they take on a huge contingency\n\n 14 risk that is in our view beneficial to investors. So, the\n\n 15 contingency risk here, we paid over $60,000 out of pocket to\n\n 16 prosecute this action, and we took the risk that we would see\n\n 17 none of that money going forward.\n\n 18 We also spent a great deal of time thoroughly\n\n 19 investigating the claims in this action, hiring an investigator,\n\n 20 and doing all of that groundwork in order to have an amended\n\n 21 complaint strong enough that we would be able to withstand any\n\n 22 motion to dismiss. So, the contingency risk here is real.\n\n 23 And were the case to go forward, we have seen cases,\n\n 24 you get to summary judgment, you've spent a million dollars in\n\n 25 expenses, hiring experts, defending depositions, and you lose,\n\n\n Kevin P. Carlin, RMR, CRR\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 109 filed 02/25/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 25 of 34\n 25\n\n 22-cv-2105-WJM Fairness Hearing 02-19-2025\n\n\n 1 and you don't get that money back. So, the contingency risk in\n\n 2 these cases is very high. So, I would say that's a big factor\n\n 3 in our favor.\n\n 4 THE COURT: Well, I would agree with that. I think it\n\n 5 is an accurate statement that plaintiffs in securities actions\n\n 6 have a high bar to clear on a Rule 12. So, I will grant you\n\n 7 that. Go ahead.\n\n 8 MS. LENAHAN: Thank you. And the other one that I\n\n 9 think is -- particularly weighs in our favor here is the time\n\n 10 and labor expended. We spent over 1,100 hours on this case,\n\n 11 which, you know, is time that we were not precluded from taking\n\n 12 on other cases, but it certainly informs the work that we take\n\n 13 on going forward knowing that we have to devote resources to a\n\n 14 particular case.\n\n 15 And this case, even though we settled early, there was\n\n 16 a lot of work to be done in terms of reviewing the confirmatory\n\n 17 discovery, in terms of making the best amended complaint that we\n\n 18 could, and in terms of coming to an agreement and presenting the\n\n 19 settlement before the Court. So, we think here, that is a big\n\n 20 factor in favor of the 28 percent requested.\n\n 21 THE COURT: Okay. Let me just say, I think the cost\n\n 22 reimbursement request is very reasonable, and the 5,000-dollar\n\n 23 service award to Mr. Wang is very reasonable. It's almost\n\n 24 bordering on the nominal. So, I have no questions about that,\n\n 25 unless you want to put something on the record specifically as\n\n\n Kevin P. Carlin, RMR, CRR\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 109 filed 02/25/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 26 of 34\n 26\n\n 22-cv-2105-WJM Fairness Hearing 02-19-2025\n\n\n 1 to those two matters.\n\n 2 MS. LENAHAN: Thank you, Your Honor. Nothing to add.\n\n 3 THE COURT: Okay. My last question for you before I\n\n 4 turn to the defendants' counsel is the matter of Mr. Macaluso.\n\n 5 It's my understanding that there was -- no substitution of\n\n 6 parties ever came about in the case; right?\n\n 7 MS. LENAHAN: That's correct.\n\n 8 THE COURT: Okay. So, what we're dealing here with is\n\n 9 the fact that the claims per the settlement agreement, any\n\n 10 claims against him or his heirs and affiliates, associates, et\n\n 11 cetera, are being released; is that correct?\n\n 12 MS. LENAHAN: Yes. That's correct.\n\n 13 THE COURT: Okay. And so because of that, it's the\n\n 14 plaintiffs' view that it should not concern the Court that\n\n 15 there's been no substitution of parties for him?\n\n 16 MS. LENAHAN: Yes. Yes, Your Honor.\n\n 17 THE COURT: All right. Anything else you want to say\n\n 18 about the situation with the deceased defendant?\n\n 19 MS. LENAHAN: Just, you know, we feel terrible about\n\n 20 his tragic passing, and but I think that with respect to the\n\n 21 settlement and the release, it does not -- does not complicate\n\n 22 matters.\n\n 23 THE COURT: All right. But the point here, what I'm\n\n 24 driving at is that there will be a final extinguishing of any\n\n 25 claims against him so that the matter as to him and his estate\n\n\n Kevin P. Carlin, RMR, CRR\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 109 filed 02/25/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 27 of 34\n 27\n\n 22-cv-2105-WJM Fairness Hearing 02-19-2025\n\n\n 1 and his heirs has reached a conclusion, is what I'm driving at.\n\n 2 MS. LENAHAN: Yes. That's my understanding.\n\n 3 THE COURT: All right. Anything else you want to put\n\n 4 on the record in support of either of the two motions before me?\n\n 5 MS. LENAHAN: Nothing further, Your Honor.\n\n 6 THE COURT: All right. Thank you.\n\n 7 MS. LENAHAN: Thank you.\n\n 8 THE COURT: All right. Mr. Goldberger, I will ask you\n\n 9 to go first. From the perspective of your clients, please put\n\n 10 on the record your views on the reasonableness and fairness of\n\n 11 the settlement agreement, the fee request, the cost\n\n 12 reimbursement request, and the service award.\n\n 13 MR. GOLDBERGER: Thank you, Your Honor. Let me just\n\n 14 begin with Your Honor's question about the fire sale, because I\n\n 15 think that's obviously the big issue here. I think we have to\n\n 16 set the stage a little bit. At the time of the settlement\n\n 17 conference, not only were there a number of derivative suits, I\n\n 18 believe three at the time, but the SEC investigation had\n\n 19 ratcheted up.\n\n 20 The way the timing worked out, the lead plaintiff order\n\n 21 came out, but by that time the SEC had tremendously ratcheted up\n\n 22 its investigation, and there had been hundreds of thousands of\n\n 23 documents that were being produced to the SEC. In addition,\n\n 24 there were ten individuals that each required their own counsel\n\n 25 because of various conflicts. And so the insurance money that\n\n\n Kevin P. Carlin, RMR, CRR\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 109 filed 02/25/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 28 of 34\n 28\n\n 22-cv-2105-WJM Fairness Hearing 02-19-2025\n\n\n 1 was available to pay for all that defense cost was rapidly being\n\n 2 exhausted. This was a wasting policy, and so the money was just\n\n 3 disappearing incredibly quickly.\n\n 4 THE COURT: I can imagine, in these circumstances.\n\n 5 MR. GOLDBERGER: Yes, Your Honor. And in addition, I\n\n 6 think this case has one unique aspect that we did inform\n\n 7 plaintiffs' counsel about, and in fact have informed the SEC\n\n 8 about. There is in this case very unusually an enormous advice\n\n 9 of counsel defense. There were a number of decisions and\n\n 10 consultations related to the actual disclosures that were made\n\n 11 at the time that are the subject of the plaintiffs' complaint.\n\n 12 It would have been our position that all of those had been made\n\n 13 with the explicit advice of counsel, thus negating scienter.\n\n 14 And while we may not have been able to prove that at\n\n 15 the time of a motion to dismiss, it certainly would have become\n\n 16 the topic of discovery and then a summary judgment motion. And\n\n 17 so that factored heavily into, I think, both sides'\n\n 18 decision-making. And I will tell you that at this stage --\n\n 19 THE COURT: And that point was communicated via the\n\n 20 mediator to plaintiffs?\n\n 21 MR. GOLDBERGER: Via the mediator. We communicated\n\n 22 that via Mr. Meyer, and told him that that's where we were\n\n 23 headed, and we were told that he passed that on.\n\n 24 THE COURT: All right.\n\n 25 MR. GOLDBERGER: So, I think that factored into this\n\n\n Kevin P. Carlin, RMR, CRR\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 109 filed 02/25/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 29 of 34\n 29\n\n 22-cv-2105-WJM Fairness Hearing 02-19-2025\n\n\n 1 whole consideration. I can also tell Your Honor that at this\n\n 2 stage, the company is almost out of money. It is in\n\n 3 dissolution. It has announced that it will go into dissolution.\n\n 4 We are frankly waiting for hopefully approval of this settlement\n\n 5 and an accompanying derivative settlement in two months, because\n\n 6 in order to file the dissolution papers in Delaware, we have to\n\n 7 be able to state that we don't have any outstanding claims. And\n\n 8 so that's what we're waiting for, but at that point we will go\n\n 9 into dissolution. So, in fact the concern that there wouldn't\n\n 10 even be an entity there turned out to be accurate.\n\n 11 And I can also tell Your Honor that we're almost out of\n\n 12 insurance money. So, at this stage, there's almost nothing\n\n 13 left. So, in terms of it being a fire sale, perhaps, but the\n\n 14 class would have wound up with nothing if we had proceeded all\n\n 15 through discovery, because there would have been no money at all\n\n 16 available for the class. It all would have been exhausted in\n\n 17 the proceedings themselves.\n\n 18 So, from my point of view, those two factors, the lack\n\n 19 of cash and the unique advice of counsel defense is what counsel\n\n 20 is approving this settlement as fair and reasonable.\n\n 21 THE COURT: All right. Do you wish to be heard on the\n\n 22 fee and costs motion?\n\n 23 MR. GOLDBERGER: Your Honor, we have no objection to\n\n 24 the fee. We have nothing more to say on that.\n\n 25 THE COURT: All right. Thank you. I want to give\n\n\n Kevin P. Carlin, RMR, CRR\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 109 filed 02/25/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 30 of 34\n 30\n\n 22-cv-2105-WJM Fairness Hearing 02-19-2025\n\n\n 1 whichever other defense counsel the opportunity to take the\n\n 2 lectern and speak on behalf of their clients. Ms. Garnett?\n\n 3 MS. GARNETT: Thank you, Your Honor. In addition to\n\n 4 the points that Mr. Goldberger just raised, I would note that as\n\n 5 it related to Ms. Cherevka, the fair and reasonableness of the\n\n 6 settlement is really embodied in the mediation that she\n\n 7 participated in on behalf -- as me as her counsel, we submitted\n\n 8 a 22-page mediation statement that was confidentially shared\n\n 9 with the parties.\n\n 10 We laid out the defenses that we would assert if we\n\n 11 were to get to discovery, but really our eyes were on the SEC\n\n 12 investigation and making sure that there were sufficient\n\n 13 proceeds to be able to defend Ms. Cherevka in that\n\n 14 investigation.\n\n 15 THE COURT: Okay.\n\n 16 MS. GARNETT: Thank you.\n\n 17 THE COURT: Thank you. Mr. Hoffman?\n\n 18 MR. HOFFMAN: Thank you, Your Honor. From\n\n 19 Dr. Bar-Or's point of view, I agree with everything my\n\n 20 co-counsel -- all the co-defense counsel have said. I just\n\n 21 underscore that Dr. Bar-Or denies any liability, and the\n\n 22 settlement embodies that, and we would indeed intend to litigate\n\n 23 and defend the case vigorously, you know, with multiple\n\n 24 defenses, as other counsel has been noted. But of course\n\n 25 there's always risk in any litigation, and Dr. Bar-Or at this\n\n\n Kevin P. Carlin, RMR, CRR\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 109 filed 02/25/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 31 of 34\n 31\n\n 22-cv-2105-WJM Fairness Hearing 02-19-2025\n\n\n 1 point in his life and career really would like to just put\n\n 2 everything behind him. So, on balance, the settlement is a fair\n\n 3 and reasonable settlement considering those factors from his own\n\n 4 personal point of view.\n\n 5 THE COURT: All right. Thank you.\n\n 6 MR. HOFFMAN: Thank you.\n\n 7 THE COURT: All right. Addressing specifically the\n\n 8 issue of objections, I note again that no objections were filed\n\n 9 by the deadline that I set in my preliminary approval order,\n\n 10 that deadline being January 29th of this year. No objections\n\n 11 were received, and I will note for the record that apart from\n\n 12 counsel, my staff, and I, there are no other individuals present\n\n 13 in the courtroom right now to make an objection on the record.\n\n 14 One second. All right.\n\n 15 I intend to enter in the very near future a written\n\n 16 order fully setting forth the bases for my decision, but I will\n\n 17 briefly summarize my intended rulings at this time.\n\n 18 I find that the settlement negotiated by counsel is\n\n 19 fair, reasonable, and adequate, and I will grant lead\n\n 20 plaintiff's motion for final approval of the class action\n\n 21 settlement filed at ECF 100.\n\n 22 The parties have shown to me to my satisfaction that\n\n 23 the settlement agreement was negotiated at arm's length by\n\n 24 counsel that is experienced in litigating these type of security\n\n 25 class action cases. The settlement assures that the class\n\n\n Kevin P. Carlin, RMR, CRR\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 109 filed 02/25/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 32 of 34\n 32\n\n 22-cv-2105-WJM Fairness Hearing 02-19-2025\n\n\n 1 members will receive reasonable compensation in light of the\n\n 2 uncertainties of litigating to a judgment. It also provides a\n\n 3 significant immediate benefit to the class, and avoids\n\n 4 protracted litigation over these disputes. The fact that no\n\n 5 class member has objected to the settlement, and no class member\n\n 6 has requested exclusion from the class settlement shows to me\n\n 7 that the class members consider this settlement to be fair and\n\n 8 reasonable. All of these factors support my finding that the\n\n 9 settlement agreement is fair, adequate, and reasonable, and it\n\n 10 will be approved.\n\n 11 I also intend to grant lead counsel's motion for an\n\n 12 award of attorneys' fees, reimbursement of expenses, and award\n\n 13 to lead plaintiff, filed at ECF 100. I find that the requested\n\n 14 amount of fees and costs is reasonable considering the effort\n\n 15 expended on this case by class counsel, the risk and\n\n 16 difficulties inherent in this sort of litigation, the skill\n\n 17 required, and the dedication displayed over the litigation of\n\n 18 this matter.\n\n 19 The requested attorneys' fee award, which is\n\n 20 approximately 28 percent of the total settlement amount, is in\n\n 21 fact in line with awards granted in other contingency cases by\n\n 22 this Court and other Courts and other judges in this district.\n\n 23 The actual costs incurred, in my view, are also reasonable in\n\n 24 light of the scope of the representation. Thus, I approve the\n\n 25 attorneys' fees and costs reimbursement as requested.\n\n\n Kevin P. Carlin, RMR, CRR\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 109 filed 02/25/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 33 of 34\n 33\n\n 22-cv-2105-WJM Fairness Hearing 02-19-2025\n\n\n 1 Finally, I approve the service payment award of $5,000\n\n 2 to named plaintiff Tao Wang. I find this amount to be\n\n 3 reasonable given plaintiff Wang's relative participation in the\n\n 4 case. The amount requested is also in my view reasonable as\n\n 5 compared to the size of the overall recovery.\n\n 6 All right. I have covered everything I need to cover\n\n 7 in this hearing. Are there any other matters from the\n\n 8 plaintiffs' perspective that we need to address this morning?\n\n 9 MS. LENAHAN: I have nothing further, Your Honor.\n\n 10 Thank you.\n\n 11 THE COURT: All right. Thank you. Anything further\n\n 12 from any of the defense counsel?\n\n 13 MR. GOLDBERGER: Nothing further, Your Honor.\n\n 14 MR. COMPTON: No, Your Honor. Thank you.\n\n 15 THE COURT: Thank you, folks. That will be it.\n\n 16 (Proceedings concluded at 11:26 a.m.)\n\n 17\n\n 18\n\n 19\n\n 20\n\n 21\n\n 22\n\n 23\n\n 24\n\n 25\n\n\n Kevin P. Carlin, RMR, CRR\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 109 filed 02/25/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 34 of 34\n 34\n\n\n\n\n 1 REPORTER'S CERTIFICATE\n\n 2\n\n 3\n\n 4 I, KEVIN P. CARLIN, Official Court Reporter for the\n\n 5 United States District Court for the District of Colorado, a\n\n 6 Registered Merit Reporter and Certified Realtime Reporter, do\n\n 7 hereby certify that I reported by machine shorthand the\n\n 8 proceedings contained herein at the time and place\n\n 9 aforementioned and that the foregoing pages constitute a full,\n\n 10 true, and correct transcript.\n\n 11 Dated this 25th day of February, 2025.\n\n 12\n\n 13\n\n 14\n\n 15\n\n 16\n Kevin P. Carlin, RMR, CRR\n 17 Official Court Reporter\n\n 18\n\n 19\n\n 20\n\n 21\n\n 22\n\n 23\n\n 24\n\n 25\n\n\n Kevin P. Carlin, RMR, CRR\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2026-06-24T12:56:49.469116-07:00","document_number":"109","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"039011803930","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2025-02-28T19:55:56.194017-08:00","date_modified":"2026-06-24T12:55:21.403167-07:00","date_filed":"2025-02-25","time_filed":null,"entry_number":109,"recap_sequence_number":"2025-02-25.001","pacer_sequence_number":313,"description":"TRANSCRIPT of Fairness Hearing held on 02/19/2025 before Judge Martinez. Pages: 1-34. NOTICE - REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: Within seven calendar days of this filing, each party shall inform the Court, by filing a Notice of Intent to Redact, of the party's intent to redact personal identifiers from the electronic transcript of the court proceeding. If a Notice of Intent to Redact is not filed within the allotted time, this transcript will be made electronically available after 90 days. Please see the Notice of Electronic Availability of Transcripts document at www.cod.uscourts.gov. Transcript may only be viewed at the court's public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber prior to the 90 day deadline for electronic posting on PACER. (kcarl, ) (Entered: 02/25/2025)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/417968050/","id":417968050,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/431751448/","id":431751448,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/64904094/107/wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc/","date_created":"2025-02-28T19:55:56.149721-08:00","date_modified":"2026-06-24T12:55:21.290094-07:00","sha1":"df7b050c3c93340d6bc800cc4d593e41cb4ec4a4","page_count":2,"file_size":118084,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.107.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.107.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 107 filed 02/19/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 1 of 2\n\n\n\n\n IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO\n Judge William J. Mart\u00ednez\n\nDate: February 19, 2025\nCourtroom Deputy: Heidi L. Guerra\nCourt Reporter: Kevin Carlin\nLaw Clerk: Taylor Shields\n\n\n Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Counsel:\n\n TAO WANG, and James Milligan Wilson Jr.\n SYNWORLD TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, Katherine M. Lenahan\n Individually and on behalf of all others\n similarly situated,\n\n Plaintiffs,\n\n v.\n\n AMPIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., M. Norman Goldberger\n MICHAEL A. MARTINO, Patrick G. Compton\n MICHAEL MACALUSO,\n HOLLI CHERECKA, Emily Renwick Garnett\n DAN STOKELY,\n DAVID BAR-OR, Brian Neil Hoffman\n PHILIP H. COELHO,\n RICHARD B. GILES,\n JUSTIN KEISTER,\n PADME MANAGEMENT CORP.,\n LYNN HEDEMAN,\n MATTHEW SHIPLEY, and\n PUNIT KOHLI,\n\n Defendants.\n\n\n COURTROOM MINUTES\n\n\nFAIRNESS HEARING\n\n10:33 a.m. Court in session.\n\nCourt calls case. Appearances of counsel.\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 107 filed 02/19/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 2 of 2\n\n\n\n\nOpening statements by the Court.\n\nCourt addresses Motion for Order to Grant Final Approval of the Class Action\nSettlement [ECF 100] and Motion for Attorney Fees [ECF 101].\n\nCourt summarizes the background of the litigation to date.\n\nArgument given on the proposed settlement agreement.\n\nNo oral or written objections were submitted to the Court from any member of the\nPlaintiff class.\n\nWritten order to follow.\n\n11:26 a.m. Court in recess. Hearing concluded.\n\nTotal time in court: 53 minutes\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2025-08-12T07:21:38.951705-07:00","document_number":"107","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"039011792007","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2025-02-28T19:55:56.137023-08:00","date_modified":"2026-06-24T12:55:21.263858-07:00","date_filed":"2025-02-19","time_filed":null,"entry_number":107,"recap_sequence_number":"2025-02-19.001","pacer_sequence_number":306,"description":"MINUTE ENTRY for Fairness Hearing held on 2/19/2025 before Judge William J. Martinez. Court Reporter: Kevin Carlin. (hguer) (Entered: 02/19/2025)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/417968049/","id":417968049,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/431751447/","id":431751447,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/64904094/106/wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc/","date_created":"2025-02-28T19:55:56.120360-08:00","date_modified":"2026-06-24T12:55:21.234522-07:00","sha1":"7af8a61af88b534cdd4d565b202240111d23ba89","page_count":7,"file_size":205458,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.106.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.106.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 106 filed 01/27/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 1 of 7\n\n\n\n\n IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO\n\nCivil Action No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC\n\nTAO WANG, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,\nSYNWORLD TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, individually and on behalf of all others\nsimilarly situated,\n\n Plaintiff,\nv.\n\nAMPIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.\nMICHAEL A. MARTINO,\nMICHAEL MACALUSO,\nHOLLI CHEREVKA,\nDAN STOKELY,\nDAVID BAR-OR,\nPHILIP H. COELHO, and\nRICHARD B. GILES\n\n Defendants.\n\n REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF LEAD PLAINTIFFS\u2019 MOTION\n FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF THE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND LEAD\n COUNSEL\u2019S MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS\u2019 FEES,\n REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES, AND AN AWARD TO LEAD PLAINTIFFS\n\n Pursuant to Rule 23(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Lead Plaintiffs Tao Wang\n\nand his wholly-owned company, SynWorld Technologies Corporation (collectively with Mr.\n\nWang, \u201cPlaintiffs\u201d), on behalf of themselves and the putative Settlement Class,1 and Lead\n\nCounsel Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, respectfully submit this reply memorandum of law in support of\n\nPlaintiffs\u2019 Motion for Final Approval of the Class Action Settlement (\u201cFinal Approval Motion\u201d\n\n\n\n1\n Unless otherwise noted, the following conventions are used herein: (a) all emphases are\nadded; (b) all citations and internal quotation marks are omitted; and (c) all capitalized terms\nhave the meaning ascribed to them in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement dated May\n13, 2024 (\u201cStipulation\u201d or \u201cStip.\u201d), ECF No. 93.\n\n\n 1\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 106 filed 01/27/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 2 of 7\n\n\n\n\nor \u201cFA Mot.\u201d), ECF No. 100, and Lead Counsel\u2019s Motion for an Award of Attorneys\u2019 Fees,\n\nReimbursement of Expenses, and an Award to Lead Plaintiffs (\u201cFee Motion\u201d), ECF No. 101\n\n(collectively, the \u201cMotions\u201d). This reply is supported by the Supplemental Declaration of Anne-\n\nMarie Marra of Simpluris Regarding Notice and Settlement Administration (\u201cMarra\n\nSupplemental Declaration\u201d or \u201cMarra Suppl. Decl.\u201d), submitted herewith.\n\n MEMORANDUM OF LAW\n\n Plaintiffs and Lead Counsel are pleased to advise the Court of the positive reaction to\n\ndate to the proposed Settlement, Plan of Allocation, and the Fee Motion. Courts have uniformly\n\nrecognized that a class\u2019s reaction is a significant factor to consider when evaluating whether the\n\nproposed settlement and plan of allocation are fair, adequate, and reasonable, and whether the\n\nrequested attorneys\u2019 fees, expenses, and an award for the plaintiff are fair and reasonable.\n\nFollowing an extensive notice program, which included the mailing of 25,405 Postcard Notices\n\nto potential Class members and nominees, no one has requested exclusion from the Settlement or\n\nobjected to the Settlement, Plan of Allocation, or the Fee Motion, even though there are only two\n\ndays left before the January 29, 2025 deadline to do so. Furthermore, the participation rate in\n\nthis case has been exceptional. To date, 24,123 claims on behalf of potential Class Members\n\nhave been submitted, which amounts to a participation rate of approximately 95% based on\n\nPostcard Notices mailed. This is far greater than the 20-30% claims rate ordinarily seen in\n\nsecurities class actions.\n\n Thus, Plaintiffs and Lead Counsel respectfully submit that the proposed Class\u2019s reaction\n\nprovides further support for the Motions, which are unopposed by Defendants.\n\n\n\n\n 2\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 106 filed 01/27/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 3 of 7\n\n\n\n\n ARGUMENT\n\nI. THE NOTICE PROGRAM TO DATE\n\n As detailed in the Final Approval Motion, the notice program approved by the Court was\n\nimplemented and satisfies the requirements of Rule 23, the Private Securities Litigation Reform\n\nAct of 1995, 15 U.S.C. \u00a778u-4, et seq., and due process. FA Mot. at 13-15.\n\n Pursuant to the Order preliminarily approving the Settlement (\u201cPreliminary Approval\n\nOrder\u201d or \u201cPA Order\u201d), ECF No. 97, 25,404 copies of the Postcard Notices were mailed to\n\npotential Class Members and nominees beginning on October 15, 2024. See Marra Suppl. Decl.\n\n\u00b64. That same day, the Notice of Pendency of Class Action Settlement and the Claim Form,\n\nalong with other materials, were posted on the website, www.ampiosecuritiessettlement.com. Id.\n\nat \u00b617. The Summary Notice was published in Investor\u2019s Business Daily and transmitted over\n\nPR Newswire on October 28, 2024. ECF No. 99 \u00b6\u00b615-16 & 99-6. The Claims Administrator\n\nalso set up a toll-free telephone number to answer any questions or concerns from Class\n\nMembers and nominees. ECF No. 99 at \u00b618.\n\n Pursuant to the schedule set forth in the Preliminary Approval Order, Plaintiffs and Lead\n\nCounsel filed their opening papers in support of the Motions on December 23, 2024. See ECF\n\nNos. 99-102. Thereafter, Lead Counsel continued to communicate with the Claims\n\nAdministrator regarding the notice program\u2019s progress. As of January 24, 2025, the Claims\n\nAdministrator has received 351 Claim Forms from individuals, and 55 Claim Forms from\n\nNominees or third-party filers on behalf of 23,772 clients. Marra Suppl. Decl. \u00b622. This is an\n\nexceptionally high participation rate, where 25,404 Postcard Notices were mailed and 24,123\n\nclaims, or approximately 95% of the number of notices that went out, were received. See In re\n\n\n\n\n 3\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 106 filed 01/27/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 4 of 7\n\n\n\n\n Celera Corp. Sec. Litig., 2015 WL 7351449, at *7 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 20, 2015) (noting that the\n\n participation rate in securities matters is typically 20-30%). Indeed, the number of claims will\n\n likely increase, as there are often late claims submitted. Lead Counsel has the discretion to\n\n accept late claims for processing and will submit them to the Court for approval in connection\n\n with the motion for approval of the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund to Class Members as\n\n long as the processing of such late claims does not materially delay distribution. See PA Order at\n\n 7 \u00b616.\n\nII. THE CLASS\u2019S REACTION FURTHER SUPPORTS APPROVAL OF THE\n SETTLEMENT AND THE PLAN OF ALLOCATION\n\n \u201cThe reaction of the class to the proffered settlement \u2026 is perhaps the most significant\n\n factor to be weighed in considering its adequacy . . . .\u201d In re Davita Healthcare Partners, Inc.\n\n Derivative Litig., 2015 WL 3582265, at *3 (D. Colo. June 5, 2015) (Mart\u00ednez, J.) (quoting In re\n\n Rambus Inc. Derivative Litig., 2009 WL 166689, at *3 (N.D. Cal. 2009)). In gauging the class\u2019s\n\n reaction, courts consider any objections to the settlement and any exclusion requests filed. See\n\n id.\n\n Although the deadline for Class Members to object to the Settlement or request\n\n exclusion, January 29, 2025, has not yet passed, thus far no requests for exclusion or objection\n\n have been received. The lack of objections and exclusions to date \u201cweighs heavily in favor of\n\n approval\u201d of the settlement. DaVita, 2015 WL 3582265, at *3; see also Or. Laborers Emps.\n\n Pension Tr. Fund v. Maxar Techs. Inc., 2024 WL 98387, at *5 (D. Colo. Jan. 9, 2024) (Mart\u00ednez,\n\n J.) (giving \u201cgreat weight\u201d to the lack of objections and the fact that only three exclusion requests\n\n were received in determining the fairness and reasonableness of the settlement).\n\n\n\n\n 4\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 106 filed 01/27/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 5 of 7\n\n\n\n\n In the event requests for exclusions or objections are received on or before the deadline\n\nof January 29, 2025, Plaintiffs will address them via letter to the Court before the Settlement\n\nHearing.\n\nIII. THE CLASS\u2019S REACTION SUPPORTS APPROVAL OF THE FEE MOTION\n\n The Postcard Notice and Notice informed Class Members that Lead Counsel would apply\n\nfor an award of attorneys\u2019 fees of 28% of the Settlement Fund, reimbursement of expenses up to\n\n$75,000, and an award to Plaintiffs not to exceed $5,000. See ECF Nos. 99-1 at 2, 99-2 at 2, 4.\n\nThey also informed Class members of their right to object to the Fee Motion and the January 29,\n\n2025 deadline for submitting such objections. See ECF Nos. 99-1 at 2, 99-2 at 2, 12-13 On\n\nDecember 23, 2024, Lead Counsel filed the Fee Motion seeking 28% in attorneys\u2019 fees,\n\n$66,475.24 in expenses, and a $5,000 award for Plaintiffs. See ECF No. 101 at 1-2. As noted\n\nabove, the deadline has not yet passed but no objections to the Fee Motion have been received.\n\n The lack of objections to the Fee Motion so far weighs strongly in favor of approval. See\n\nO\u2019Dowd v. Anthem, Inc., 2019 WL 4279123, at *14 (D. Colo. Sept. 9, 2019).\n\n Lead Counsel will file a letter with the Court in the event objections to the Fee Motion\n\nare received on or before the deadline.\n\n CONCLUSION\n\n Plaintiffs and Lead Counsel respectfully request the Court grant their Motions in their\n\nentirety.\n\nDated: January 27, 2025 Respectfully submitted,\n\n By: s/ James M. Wilson, Jr.\n\n James M. Wilson, Jr.\n FARUQI & FARUQI, LLP\n 685 Third Avenue, 26th Floor\n\n\n\n 5\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 106 filed 01/27/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 6 of 7\n\n\n\n\n New York, NY 10017\n Telephone: 212-983-9330\n Facsimile: 212-983-9331\n Email: jwilson@faruqilaw.com\n\n Robert W. Killorin\n FARUQI & FARUQI, LLP\n 3565 Piedmont Road NE Building Four\n Suite 380\n Atlanta, GA 30305\n Telephone: 404-847-0617\n Facsimile: 404-506-9534\n Email: rkillorin@faruqilaw.com\n\n Attorneys for Lead Plaintiffs Tao Wang and SynWorld\n Technologies Corporation and Lead Counsel for the\n putative Class\n\n\n\n\n 6\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 106 filed 01/27/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 7 of 7\n\n\n\n\n CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE\n\n I, James M. Wilson, Jr., hereby certify that on January 27, 2025, I electronically filed the\n\nforegoing with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such\n\nfiling to the e-mail addresses denoted on the Court\u2019s Electronic Mail Notice List.\n\n s/ James M. Wilson, Jr.\n James M. Wilson, Jr.\n\n\n CERTIFICATE OF CONFERRAL\n\n Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(a), prior to filing the foregoing Motion, Plaintiffs\u2019\n\ncounsel emailed it to Defendants\u2019 counsel and Defendants\u2019 counsel responded via email\n\nconfirming that Defendants do not oppose it.\n\n\n s/ James M. Wilson, Jr.\n James M. Wilson, Jr.\n\n\n\n\n 1\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2025-08-12T06:45:33.728840-07:00","document_number":"106","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"039011748693","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2025-02-28T19:55:56.107225-08:00","date_modified":"2026-06-24T12:55:21.206393-07:00","date_filed":"2025-01-27","time_filed":null,"entry_number":106,"recap_sequence_number":"2025-01-27.002","pacer_sequence_number":302,"description":"REPLY to Response to 101 MOTION for Attorney Fees / Lead Counsel's Motion for an Award of Attorneys' Fees, Reimbursement of Expenses, and an Award to Lead Plaintiffs; and Memorandum of Law in Support, 100 MOTION for Order to Grant Final Approval of the Class Action Settlement; Memorandum of Law in Support filed by Plaintiffs Tao Wang, SynWorld Technologies Corporation. (Wilson, James) (Entered: 01/27/2025)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/417968048/","id":417968048,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/431751446/","id":431751446,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/64904094/105/wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc/","date_created":"2025-02-28T19:55:56.092668-08:00","date_modified":"2026-06-24T12:55:21.182112-07:00","sha1":"5c04d897eb49132b681ee943fc79b35807709145","page_count":3,"file_size":373266,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.105.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.105.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 105 filed 01/27/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 1 of 3\n\n\n\n\n IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO\n\n TAO WANG and SYNWORLD\n TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION,\n Individually and on Behalf of All Others Case No.: 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-MEH\n Similarly Situated,\n\n Plaintiffs, SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF\n ANNE-MARIE MARRA OF\n v. SIMPLURIS REGARDING NOTICE\n AND SETTLEMENT\n AMPIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. ADMINISTRATION\n MICHAEL A. MARTINO,\n MICHAEL MACALUSO,\n HOLLI CHEREVKA,\n DAN STOKELY\n DAVID BAR-OR,\n PHILIP H. COELHO, and\n RICHARD B. GILES,\n\n Defendants.\n\n\n I, ANNE-MARIE MARRA, declare as follows:\n\n 1. I am employed as a Program Manager by Simpluris, Inc. (\u201cSimpluris\u201d), the claims\n\nadministrator in the above-entitled action. Our corporate office address is 3194-C Airport Loop\n\nDr., Costa Mesa, CA 92626. I am over twenty-one years of age and authorized to make this\n\ndeclaration on behalf of Simpluris and myself. I have personal knowledge of the information set\n\nforth herein.\n\n 2. I submit this Declaration to supplement my earlier declaration, the Declaration of\n\nAnne-Marie Marra of Simpluris Regarding Notice and Settlement Administration, dated\n\nDecember 20, 2024 (ECF 99) (the \u201cNotice Declaration\u201d), which provided the Court with\n\ninformation regarding the implementation of the notice plan.\n\n CONTINUED DISSEMINATION OF THE MAILED NOTICE\n\n 4. Since the execution of the Notice Declaration Simpluris has continued to\n\ndisseminate copies of the Postcard Notice, Nominee Notice Packet, and blank Nominee-addressed\n\n Page 1 of 3\n SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF ANNE-MARIE MARRA OF SIMPLURIS REGARDING\n NOTICE AND SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATION\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 105 filed 01/27/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 2 of 3\n\n\n\n\nPostcard Notices. From October 15, 2024 through January 24, 2025, Simpluris has mailed a total\n\nof 685 direct-mailed Postcard Notices, 3,489 Nominee Notice Packets (consisting of a cover letter\n\nand the Postcard Notice), and 21,230 blank Nominee-addressed Postcard Notices.\n\n 5. Of the direct-mailed and blank Nominee-addressed Postcard Notices mailed,\n\nSimpluris received 52 Postcard Notices returned as undeliverable from the U.S. Postal Service.\n\nSimpluris was able to obtain updated addresses for 11 of the Postcard Notices, which were\n\nremailed via first-class mail. A total of 41 Postcard Notices remain undeliverable.\n\n 6. Of the Nominee Notice Packets mailed, Simpluris received 321 Nominee Notice\n\nPackets returned as undeliverable from the U.S. Postal Service. Simpluris was able to obtain\n\nupdated addresses for 175 of the Nominee Notice Packets, which were remailed via first-class\n\nmail. A total of 146 Nominee Notice Packets remain undeliverable.\n\n WEBSITE AND TELEPHONE NUMBER\n\n 17. Simpluris continues to maintain the Settlement website,\n\n(www.AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com), that includes important dates and deadlines, and\n\nSettlement-related documents, such as the Settlement Agreement. An online Claim Form module\n\nhas been active during the Claim Period and will be turned off once the Final Approval Hearing\n\nhas passed. The website has been available to the public since October 15, 2024. As of January\n\n24, 2025, the website has been visited by 2,318 unique visitors with 10,345 page views.\n\n 18. Simpluris continues to maintain the settlement specific toll-free telephone number\n\n(833-602-5027), live agent support, and interactive voice response system to accommodate any\n\npotential Class Members with questions about the Settlement. This number is active and has been\n\navailable to the public since October 14, 2024. As of January 24, 2025, the toll-free telephone\n\nnumber has received 142 phone calls, with 122 of those calls routed to live agents.\n\n REQUESTS FOR EXCLUSION AND OBJECTIONS\n\n 19. The postmark deadline for Settlement Class Members to submit a request for\n\nexclusion (\u201cOpt Out\u201d) from the proposed Settlement or object to the proposed Settlement is\n\n Page 2 of 3\n SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF ANNE-MARIE MARRA OF SIMPLURIS REGARDING\n NOTICE AND SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATION\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 105 filed 01/27/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 3 of 3\n\n\n\n\nJanuary 29, 2025.\n\n 20. As of January 24, 2025, Simpluris has received zero (0) requests for exclusion\n\nfrom the proposed Settlement from Settlement Class Members.\n\n 21. Although objections are required to be filed with the Court and mailed to counsel\n\nfor the Parties, claims administrators occasionally receive objections nonetheless. As of January\n\n24, 2025, Simpluris has received zero (0) objections to the proposed Settlement from Settlement\n\nClass Members.\n\n CLAIM FORMS RECEIVED AND PROCESSED\n\n 22. The postmark deadline for Class Members to submit a Claim Form to Simpluris\n\nwas January 13, 2025. As of January 24, 2025, Simpluris has received 324 timely and 27 late\n\nClaim Forms from individuals, and 54 timely and one (1) late Claim Forms from Nominees or\n\nthird-party filers on behalf of 23,772 clients. Simpluris is in the process of evaluating the Claim\n\nForms, the documents provided in support of the claims, and the transactions claimed in order to\n\nevaluate the Claims for completeness and calculate an initial Recognized Loss for each claimant.\n\nIf a Class Member filed a Claim Form with a curable deficiency, Simpluris will send the Class\n\nMember a notice providing information on how to cure the deficiency and provide 30 days to\n\ncure the deficiency.\n\n NOMINEE REIMBURSEMENT REQUESTS\n\n 23. As of January 24, 2025, Simpluris has received three (3) requests from Nominees\n\nfor reimbursement of their costs in notifying their clients. Simpluris has corresponded with the\n\nparties regarding whether these requests are reasonable and payable.\n\n\n\n I declare under penalty of perjury that the above is true and correct and that this\n\nDeclaration was executed this 24th day of January, 2025, in Seattle, Washington.\n\n\n __________________________________\n ANNE-MARIE MARRA\n\n Page 3 of 3\n SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF ANNE-MARIE MARRA OF SIMPLURIS REGARDING\n NOTICE AND SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATION\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2025-08-12T06:54:13.895071-07:00","document_number":"105","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"039011748684","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2025-02-28T19:55:56.080381-08:00","date_modified":"2026-06-24T12:55:21.152242-07:00","date_filed":"2025-01-27","time_filed":null,"entry_number":105,"recap_sequence_number":"2025-01-27.001","pacer_sequence_number":299,"description":"DECLARATION of Anne-Marie Marra of Simpluris Regarding Notice and Settlement Administration (Supplemental) and regarding Order on Motion for Order 97 by Plaintiffs Tao Wang, SynWorld Technologies Corporation. (Wilson, James) (Entered: 01/27/2025)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/417968047/","id":417968047,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/431751445/","id":431751445,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/64904094/104/wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc/","date_created":"2025-02-28T19:55:56.007261-08:00","date_modified":"2026-06-24T12:55:21.125632-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"104","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2025-02-28T19:55:55.986861-08:00","date_modified":"2026-06-24T12:55:21.088625-07:00","date_filed":"2025-01-10","time_filed":null,"entry_number":104,"recap_sequence_number":"2025-01-10.001","pacer_sequence_number":null,"description":"Utility Setting Hearing: Settlement Fairness Hearing set for 2/19/2025 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 801 before Judge William J. Martinez. Pursuant to ECF 97 . Text Only Entry (ccuen, ) (Entered: 01/10/2025)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/417061345/","id":417061345,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/430813623/","id":430813623,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/64904094/108/wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc/","date_created":"2025-02-20T10:33:44.607689-08:00","date_modified":"2026-06-24T12:55:21.365620-07:00","sha1":"8f0bc63f13793a07ed0fcb31e49119f8a9ab3efb","page_count":11,"file_size":182306,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.108.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.108.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 108 filed 02/20/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 1 of 11\n\n\n\n\n IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO\n Judge William J. Mart\u00ednez\n\nCivil Action No. 22-cv-2105-WJM-CYC\n\nTAO WANG and SYNWORLD\nTECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION,\nindividually and on behalf of all others\nsimilarly situated,\n\n Plaintiffs,\nv.\n\nAMPIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,\nMICHAEL A. MARTINO,\nMICHAEL MACALUSO,\nHOLLI CHEREVKA,\nDAN STOKELY,\nDAVID BAR-OR,\nPHILIP H. COELHO, and\nRICHARD B. GILES\n\n Defendants.\n\n\n FINAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT\n\n\n This action came before the Court on February 19, 2025 (\u201cSettlement Fairness\n\nHearing\u201d) to determine the fairness of the proposed Settlement presented to the Court\n\nand the subject of this Court\u2019s Order Granting Lead Plaintiffs\u2019 Unopposed Motion for\n\nPreliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement (ECF No. 97) (\u201cPreliminary Approval\n\nOrder\u201d). For the reasons set forth on the record at the Settlement Fairness Hearing and\n\nmore fully explained below, Lead Plaintiffs Tao Wang and Synworld Technologies\n\nCorporation\u2019s Motion for Final Approval of the Class Action Settlement (ECF No. 100)\n\nand Lead Counsel\u2019s Motion for an Award of Attorneys\u2019 Fees, Reimbursement of\n\nExpenses, and an Award to Lead Plaintiffs (ECF No. 101) are granted.\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 108 filed 02/20/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 2 of 11\n\n\n\n\n In so ruling, the Court observes the following: 1\n\n A. The above-captioned action is pending in this Court, and on May 13,\n\n2024, Lead Plaintiffs Tao Wang and SynWorld Technologies Corporation (\u201cLead\n\nPlaintiffs\u201d), on behalf of themselves and each member of the Settlement Class, and\n\nAmpio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (\u201cAmpio\u201d), and Michael A. Martino, Holli Cherevka, Dan\n\nStokely, David Bar-Or, Philip H. Coelho, and Richard B. Giles (the \u201cIndividual\n\nDefendants,\u201d and with Ampio, the \u201cDefendants,\u201d and collectively with Lead Plaintiffs, the\n\n\u201cParties\u201d), entered into the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement (\u201cStipulation\u201d) (ECF\n\nNo. 93) that provides for a complete dismissal with prejudice of the claims asserted\n\nagainst Defendants in the Action on the terms and conditions set forth in the Stipulation,\n\nsubject to approval of this Court (the \u201cSettlement\u201d);\n\n B. Pursuant to the Preliminary Approval Order, entered September 24, 2024\n\n(ECF No. 97), the Court scheduled a Settlement Fairness Hearing 2 for February 19,\n\n2025, to, among other things: (i) determine whether the proposed Settlement of the\n\nAction on the terms and conditions provided for in the Stipulation is fair, reasonable, and\n\nadequate, and should be approved by the Court; (ii) determine whether a judgment as\n\nprovided for in the Stipulation should be entered; and (iii) rule on Lead Counsel\u2019s Fee\n\nand Expense Application;\n\n C. The Court ordered that the Notice of (I) Pendency of Class Action and\n\n\n\n\n 1 Capitalized terms not defined in this Order and Judgment shall have the meaning set\n\nforth in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement. (See ECF No. 93.)\n 2 For the avoidance of any confusion, \u201cSettlement Fairness Hearing\u201d has the same\n\nmeaning as \u201cSettlement Hearing\u201d as that term is defined in the Stipulation. (ECF No. 93 at\n\u00b6 1(xx).)\n\n\n\n 2\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 108 filed 02/20/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 3 of 11\n\n\n\n\nProposed Settlement; (II) Settlement Fairness Hearing; and (III) Motion for Attorneys\u2019\n\nFees and Litigation Expenses (\u201cNotice\u201d) and Proof of Claim and Release Form (\u201cClaim\n\nForm\u201d), substantially in the forms attached to the Stipulation as Exhibits A-1 and A-3, be\n\nposted on the settlement website www.AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com on or before\n\nOctober 15, 2024, that the Postcard Notice of (I) Pendency of Class Action and\n\nProposed Settlement; (II) Settlement Fairness Hearing; and (III) Motion for Attorneys\u2019\n\nFees and Litigation Expenses (the \u201cPostcard Notice\u201d), substantially in the form attached\n\nto the Stipulation as Exhibit A-2, be mailed by first-class mail, postage prepaid, on or\n\nbefore October 15, 2024 to all potential Settlement Class Members to the list of record\n\nholders of Ampio securities, and that a Summary Notice of (I) Pendency of Class Action\n\nand Proposed Settlement; (II) Settlement Fairness Hearing; and (III) Motion for\n\nAttorneys\u2019 Fees and Litigation Expenses (the \u201cSummary Notice\u201d), substantially in the\n\nform attached to the Stipulation as Exhibit A-4, be published in Investor\u2019s Business Daily\n\nand transmitted over PR Newswire by October 29, 2024;\n\n D. The Notice, Postcard Notice, and Summary Notice advised potential\n\nSettlement Class Members of the date, time, place, and purpose of the Settlement\n\nFairness Hearing. The Notice further advised that any objections to the Settlement\n\nwere required to be filed with the Court and served on counsel for the Parties such that\n\nthey were received by January 29, 2025;\n\n E. The provisions of the Preliminary Approval Order as to notice were\n\ncomplied with;\n\n F. On December 23, 2024, Lead Plaintiffs moved for final approval of the\n\nSettlement and for an award of attorneys\u2019 fees, reimbursement of expenses, and an\n\n\n\n\n 3\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 108 filed 02/20/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 4 of 11\n\n\n\n\naward to Lead Plaintiffs, as set forth in the Preliminary Approval Order. (See ECF Nos.\n\n100, 101.) The Settlement Fairness Hearing was duly held before this Court on\n\nFebruary 19, 2025, at which time all interested Persons were afforded the opportunity to\n\nbe heard; and\n\n G. This Court has duly considered Lead Plaintiffs\u2019 motion for final approval of\n\nthe Settlement, the affidavits, declarations, memoranda of law submitted in support\n\nthereof, the Stipulation, and all of the submissions and arguments presented with\n\nrespect to the proposed Settlement.\n\n NOW, THEREFORE, after due deliberation, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND\n\nDECREED that:\n\n 1. This Order and Judgment incorporate and make a part hereof: (i) the\n\nStipulation filed with the Court on May 13, 2024 (ECF No. 93); and (ii) the Notice, which\n\nwas filed with the Court on December 23, 2024 (see ECF No. 99).\n\n 2. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Action and over\n\nall Parties to the Action, including all Settlement Class Members.\n\n 3. The Court hereby certifies, for the purposes of the Settlement only, the\n\nAction as a class action pursuant to Rule 23(a) and (b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil\n\nProcedure on behalf of the Settlement Class. Excluded from the Settlement Class are\n\n(i) Defendants; (ii) members of the Immediate Family of any Individual Defendant; (iii) all\n\nsubsidiaries and affiliates of Ampio and the current and former directors and officers of\n\nAmpio and its subsidiaries or affiliates; (iv) any firm, trust, partnership, corporation, or\n\nentity in which any Defendant has a controlling interest; (v) the legal representatives,\n\nagents, affiliates, heirs, successors-in-interest or assigns of all such excluded parties;\n\n\n\n\n 4\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 108 filed 02/20/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 5 of 11\n\n\n\n\nand (vi) any persons or entities who properly exclude themselves by filing a valid and\n\ntimely request for exclusion.\n\n 4. The Court finds that the mailing and publication of the Postcard Notice,\n\nNotice, Claim Form, and Summary Notice: (i) complied with the Preliminary Approval\n\nOrder; (ii) constituted the best notice practicable under the circumstances; (iii)\n\nconstituted notice that was reasonably calculated to apprise Settlement Class Members\n\nof the effect of the Settlement, of the proposed Plan of Allocation, of Lead Counsel\u2019s\n\nanticipated Fee and Expense Application, of Settlement Class Members\u2019 right to object\n\nor seek exclusion from the Settlement Class, and of their right to appear at the\n\nSettlement Fairness Hearing; (iv) constituted due, adequate, and sufficient notice to all\n\nPersons entitled to receive notice of the proposed Settlement; and (v) satisfied the\n\nnotice requirements of Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the United\n\nStates Constitution (including the Due Process Clause), and the Private Securities\n\nLitigation Reform Act of 1995 (the \u201cPSLRA\u201d), 15 U.S.C. \u00a7 78u-4(a)(7).\n\n 5. There are no objections to the proposed Settlement.\n\n 6. Pursuant to Rule 23(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this\n\nCourt hereby approves the Settlement and finds that in light of the benefits to the\n\nSettlement Class, the complexity and expense of further litigation, and the costs of\n\ncontinued litigation, said Settlement is, in all respects, fair, reasonable, and adequate,\n\nhaving considered and found that: (a) Lead Plaintiffs and Lead Counsel have\n\nadequately represented the Settlement Class; (b) the proposal was negotiated at arm\u2019s-\n\nlength; (c) the relief provided for the Settlement Class is adequate, having taken into\n\naccount (i) the costs, risks, and delay of trial and appeal; (ii) the effectiveness of any\n\n\n\n\n 5\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 108 filed 02/20/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 6 of 11\n\n\n\n\nproposed method of distributing relief to the Settlement Class, including the method of\n\nprocessing Settlement Class Member claims; (iii) the terms of any proposed award of\n\nattorneys\u2019 fees, including timing of payment; and (iv) any agreement required to be\n\nidentified under Rule 23(e)(3); and (d) the proposed Plan of Allocation treats Settlement\n\nClass Members equitably relative to each other. Accordingly, the Settlement is hereby\n\napproved in all respects and shall be consummated in accordance with the terms and\n\nprovisions of the Stipulation.\n\n 7. The Amended Class Action Complaint (\u201cAC\u201d), filed on October 16, 2023\n\n(ECF No. 57), is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, and without costs to any Party,\n\nexcept as otherwise provided in the Stipulation.\n\n 8. The Court finds that during the course of the Action, the Parties and their\n\nrespective counsel at all times complied with the requirements of Rule 11 of the Federal\n\nRules of Civil Procedure.\n\n 9. Upon the Effective Date, Lead Plaintiffs and each of the other Settlement\n\nClass Members, on behalf of themselves, and their respective heirs, executors,\n\ntrustees, administrators, administrators, predecessors, successors, and assigns, in their\n\ncapacities as such, shall be deemed to have, and by operation of law and of the\n\njudgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever compromised, settled, released, resolved,\n\nrelinquished, waived, and discharged each and every Released Plaintiffs\u2019 Claim against\n\nDefendants and the Defendants\u2019 Releasees, and shall forever be barred, enjoined, and\n\nprecluded from prosecuting any or all of the Released Plaintiffs\u2019 Claims against any of\n\nthe Defendants or the Defendants\u2019 Releasees.\n\n 10. Upon the Effective Date, Defendants, on behalf of themselves, and their\n\n\n\n\n 6\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 108 filed 02/20/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 7 of 11\n\n\n\n\nrespective heirs, executors, administrators, predecessors, successors, and assigns, in\n\ntheir capacities as such, shall be deemed to have, and by operation of law and of the\n\njudgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever compromised, settled, released, resolved,\n\nrelinquished, waived, and discharged each and every Released Defendants\u2019 Claim\n\nagainst Lead Plaintiffs and the other Plaintiffs\u2019 Releasees, and shall forever be barred\n\nand enjoined from prosecuting any or all of the Released Defendants\u2019 Claims against\n\nany of the Plaintiffs\u2019 Releasees.\n\n 11. Each Settlement Class Member, whether or not such Settlement Class\n\nMember executes and delivers a Claim Form, is bound by this Order and Judgment,\n\nincluding, without limitation, the release of claims as set forth in the Stipulation.\n\n 12. This Order and Judgment and the Stipulation, whether or not\n\nconsummated, and any discussion, negotiation, proceeding, or agreement relating to\n\nthe Stipulation, the Settlement, and any matter arising in connection with settlement\n\ndiscussions or negotiations, proceedings, or agreements, shall not be offered or\n\nreceived against or to the prejudice of the Parties or their respective counsel, for any\n\npurpose other than in an action to enforce the terms hereof, and in particular:\n\n a. Do not constitute, and shall not be offered or received against or to\n\nthe prejudice of Defendants as evidence of, or construed as, or deemed to be evidence\n\nof any presumption, concession, or admission by Defendants with respect to the truth of\n\nany allegation by the Lead Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class, or the validity of any\n\nclaim that has been or could have been asserted in the Action or in any litigation,\n\nincluding but not limited to the Released Claims, or of any liability, damages,\n\nnegligence, fault or wrongdoing of Defendants or any person or entity whatsoever;\n\n\n\n\n 7\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 108 filed 02/20/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 8 of 11\n\n\n\n\n b. Do not constitute, and shall not be offered or received against or to\n\nthe prejudice of Defendants as evidence of a presumption, concession, or admission of\n\nany fault, misrepresentation, or omission with respect to any statement or written\n\ndocument approved or made by Defendants, or against or to the prejudice of Lead\n\nPlaintiffs, or any other member of the Settlement Class as evidence of any infirmity in\n\nthe claims of Lead Plaintiffs, or the other members of the Settlement Class;\n\n c. Do not constitute, and shall not be offered or received against or to\n\nthe prejudice of Defendants, Lead Plaintiffs, any other member of the Settlement Class,\n\nor their respective counsel, as evidence of a presumption, concession, or admission\n\nwith respect to any liability, damages, negligence, fault, infirmity, or wrongdoing, or in\n\nany way referred to for any other reason against or to the prejudice of any of the\n\nDefendants, Lead Plaintiffs, other members of the Settlement Class, or their respective\n\ncounsel, in any other civil, criminal, or administrative action or proceeding, other than\n\nsuch proceedings as may be necessary to effectuate the provisions of the Stipulation;\n\n d. Do not constitute, and shall not be construed against Defendants,\n\nLead Plaintiffs, or any other member of the Settlement Class, as an admission or\n\nconcession that the consideration to be given hereunder represents the amount that\n\ncould be or would have been recovered after trial; and\n\n e. Do not constitute, and shall not be construed as or received in\n\nevidence as an admission, concession, or presumption against Lead Plaintiffs, or any\n\nother member of the Settlement Class that any of their claims are without merit or infirm\n\nor that damages recoverable under the Amended Complaint would not have exceeded\n\nthe Settlement Amount.\n\n\n\n\n 8\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 108 filed 02/20/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 9 of 11\n\n\n\n\n 13. The administration of the Settlement, and the decision of all disputed\n\nquestions of law and fact with respect to the validity of any claim or right of any Person\n\nto participate in the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, shall remain under the\n\nauthority of this Court.\n\n 14. In the event that the Settlement does not become effective in accordance\n\nwith the terms of the Stipulation, then this Order and Judgment shall be rendered null\n\nand void to the extent provided by and in accordance with the Stipulation and shall be\n\nvacated, and in such event, all orders entered and releases delivered in connection\n\nherewith shall be null and void to the extent provided by and in accordance with the\n\nStipulation.\n\n 15. Without further Order of the Court, the Parties may agree to reasonable\n\nextensions of time to carry out any of the provisions of the Stipulation.\n\n 16. The Parties are hereby directed to execute the Stipulation and to perform\n\nits terms.\n\n 17. The Court hereby finds that the proposed Plan of Allocation is a fair and\n\nreasonable method to allocate the Settlement Fund among Settlement Class Members,\n\nand Lead Counsel and the Claims Administrator are directed to administer the Plan of\n\nAllocation in accordance with its terms and the terms of the Stipulation.\n\n 18. The Court hereby finds that Lead Counsel\u2019s request for attorneys\u2019 fees\n\nequivalent to 28% of the Settlement Fund, or $840,000, is reasonable in view of, among\n\nother reasons, the 1,152.3 hours counsel has dedicated to the case thus far; the\n\ncomplexity of litigation arising under the PSLRA; the contingent nature of the case; the\n\nrecovery achieved for the class, which is 14% of the Class\u2019s estimated maximum\n\n\n\n\n 9\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 108 filed 02/20/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 10 of 11\n\n\n\n\ndamages; and the fact that Lead Counsel\u2019s request for fees is unopposed. See 15\n\nU.S.C. \u00a7 78u-4(a)(6); Johnson v. Ga. Highway Express, Inc., 488 F.2d 714, 717 (5th\n\nCir. 1974). The Court further finds that Lead Counsel reasonably incurred expenses in\n\nthe amount of $66,475.24, which amount includes expenses incurred in connection with\n\na fact investigator and damages consultant, mediation fees, eDiscovery fees,\n\nphotocopying, travel, and court filing fees. See 15 U.S.C. \u00a7 78u-4(a)(6). Lead Counsel\n\nis thus awarded its attorneys\u2019 fees in the amount of $840,000 and expenses in the\n\namount of $66,475.24, plus any applicable interest. These amounts shall be paid out of\n\nthe Settlement Fund immediately following entry of this Order and Judgment subject to\n\nthe terms, conditions, and obligations of the Stipulation, which terms, conditions, and\n\nobligations are incorporated herein.\n\n 19. The Court hereby finds that Lead Plaintiff Wang\u2019s modest request for an\n\naward in the amount of $5,000 for costs and expenses directly relating to the\n\nrepresentation of the Settlement Class is reasonable in proportion to their degree of\n\ninvolvement in the litigation. 15 U.S.C. \u00a7 78u-4(a)(4). Lead Plaintiff Wang is thus\n\nawarded in total $5,000, such amounts to be paid from the Settlement Fund upon the\n\nEffective Date of the Settlement.\n\n 20. Without further approval from the Court, Lead Plaintiffs and Defendants\n\nare hereby authorized to agree to and adopt such amendments or modifications of the\n\nStipulation or any exhibits attached thereto to effectuate the Settlement that: (a) are not\n\nmaterially inconsistent with this Judgment; and (b) do not materially limit the rights of the\n\nSettlement Class Members in connection with the Settlement. Without further order of\n\nthe Court, Lead Plaintiffs and Defendants may reasonably agree to extensions of time\n\n\n\n\n 10\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 108 filed 02/20/25 USDC Colorado\n pg 11 of 11\n\n\n\n\nto carry out any provisions of the Settlement.\n\n 21. Without affecting the finality of this Order and Judgment in any way, this\n\nCourt hereby retains continuing jurisdiction over: (i) implementation of the Settlement;\n\n(ii) the allowance, disallowance or adjustment of any Settlement Class Member\u2019s claim\n\non equitable grounds and any award or distribution of the Settlement Fund; (iii)\n\ndisposition of the Settlement Fund; (iv) all Parties for the purpose of construing,\n\nenforcing and administering the Settlement and this Order and Judgment; and (vi) other\n\nmatters related or ancillary to the foregoing. There is no just reason for delay in the\n\nentry of this Order and Judgment and immediate entry by the Clerk of the Court is\n\nexpressly directed.\n\n IT IS SO ORDERED.\n\n\n Dated this 20th day of February, 2025.\n\n BY THE COURT:\n\n\n\n ______________________\n William J. Mart\u00ednez\n Senior United States District Judge\n\n\n\n\n 11\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2025-08-12T06:46:16.994191-07:00","document_number":"108","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"039011794651","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order on Motion for Attorney Fees AND Order on Motion for Order","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2025-02-20T10:33:44.591020-08:00","date_modified":"2026-06-24T12:55:21.316178-07:00","date_filed":"2025-02-20","time_filed":"11:15:54","entry_number":108,"recap_sequence_number":"2025-02-20.001","pacer_sequence_number":308,"description":"FINAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Entered by Judge William J. Martinez on 2/20/2025. (hguer) (Entered: 02/20/2025)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/413029179/","id":413029179,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/426586670/","id":426586670,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/64904094/103/wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc/","date_created":"2025-01-09T01:57:40.476442-08:00","date_modified":"2026-06-24T12:55:21.066204-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"103","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2025-01-09T01:57:40.460523-08:00","date_modified":"2026-06-24T12:55:21.038444-07:00","date_filed":"2025-01-06","time_filed":null,"entry_number":103,"recap_sequence_number":"2025-01-06.001","pacer_sequence_number":null,"description":"REASSIGNING MAGISTRATE JUDGE. This action is reassigned to Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung upon his appointment. All future pleadings should reference Magistrate Judge Chung at the end of the civil action number (such as 22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC). Unless otherwise ordered, the dates and times for all previously scheduled matters will be maintained and will now be handled by Magistrate Judge Chung in Courtroom C-205 in the Byron G. Rogers Courthouse, 1961 Stout St, Denver, CO 80294. If previously directed to contact Chief Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty or his Chambers, parties shall instead contact Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung's Chambers at the following telephone number or email address: 303-335-2761, Chung_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov. (Text only entry) (jdyne) (Entered: 01/06/2025)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/413029178/","id":413029178,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/426586669/","id":426586669,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/64904094/102/wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc/","date_created":"2025-01-09T01:57:40.448858-08:00","date_modified":"2026-06-25T03:40:40.526643-07:00","sha1":"757e10cc22ea8701a305147977efed9698a05f02","page_count":28,"file_size":237653,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.102.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.102.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 1 of 28\n\n\n\n\n IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO\n\nCivil Action No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-MEH\n\nTAO WANG, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,\nSYNWORLD TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, individually and on behalf of all others\nsimilarly situated,\n\n Plaintiff,\nv.\n\nAMPIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.\nMICHAEL A. MARTINO,\nMICHAEL MACALUSO,\nHOLLI CHEREVKA,\nDAN STOKELY,\nDAVID BAR-OR,\nPHILIP H. COELHO, and\nRICHARD B. GILES\n\n Defendants.\n\n DECLARATION OF JAMES M. WILSON, JR. IN SUPPORT OF LEAD PLAINTIFFS\u2019\n MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF THE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND\n LEAD COUNSEL\u2019S MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS\u2019 FEES,\n REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES, AND AN AWARD TO LEAD PLAINTIFFS\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 2 of 28\n\n\n\n\n I, James M. Wilson, Jr., declare as follows:\n\n 1. I am admitted in this Court. I am a partner in the law firm of Faruqi & Faruqi,\n\nLLP (the \u201cFaruqi Firm\u201d or \u201cLead Counsel\u201d), which represents Lead Plaintiffs Tao Wang and\n\nSynWorld Technologies Corporation (\u201cPlaintiffs\u201d) and the putative Class in the above-captioned\n\nsecurities class action pending in this Court (the \u201cAction\u201d).1 I have been actively involved in the\n\nprosecution of this Action and have personal knowledge of the matters set forth herein based\n\nupon my close supervision and participation in the Action. If called upon, I could and would\n\ncompetently testify that the following facts are true and correct to the best of my knowledge.\n\nI. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT\n\n 2. I respectfully submit this Declaration in support of Plaintiffs\u2019 Motion for Final\n\nApproval of the Class Action Settlement (\u201cFinal Approval Motion\u201d or \u201cFA Mot.\u201d), and Lead\n\nCounsel\u2019s Motion for an Award of Attorneys\u2019 Fees, Reimbursement of Expenses, and an Award\n\nto Plaintiffs (\u201cFee Motion\u201d or \u201cFee Mot.\u201d). Both motions are filed concurrently herewith.\n\n 3. Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and the putative Class, and Defendants Ampio\n\nPharmaceuticals, Inc. (\u201cAmpio\u201d or the \u201cCompany\u201d), Michael A. Martino, Holli Cherevka, Dan\n\nStokely, David Bar-Or, Philip H. Coelho, and Richard B. Giles (with Ampio, the \u201cDefendants\u201d),\n\nhave reached a proposed class wide Settlement for $3,000,000 that, if given final approval, will\n\nresolve all claims in the Action.\n\n\n\n\n1\n Unless otherwise noted, the following conventions are used herein: (a) all capitalized\nterms have the meaning ascribed to them in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement dated\nMay 13, 2024 (\u201cStipulation\u201d or \u201cStip.\u201d), ECF No. 93; and (b) all references to \u201cRule(s)\u201d refers to\nthe Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.\n\n\n 1\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 3 of 28\n\n\n\n\n 4. The terms of the Settlement are set forth in the Stipulation. The Court\n\npreliminarily approved the Stipulation by its Order dated September 24, 2024 (\u201cPreliminary\n\nApproval Order\u201d), ECF No. 97.\n\n 5. This declaration sets forth the nature of the claims asserted, the procedural history\n\nof the Action, and the methods by which the Settlement Class was notified of the Settlement. It\n\nalso demonstrates the reasons why the Settlement and the Plan of Allocation are fair, reasonable,\n\nand adequate, and why Lead Counsel\u2019s application for attorneys\u2019 fees, reimbursement of\n\nexpenses, and an award for Plaintiffs should be approved.\n\n 6. While Plaintiffs\u2019 Counsel believes that the allegations in the Action have\n\nsubstantial merit, Plaintiffs\u2019 Counsel respectfully submits that the Settlement represents a\n\nfavorable result for the Settlement Class.\n\n 7. The Settlement is the result of extensive arm\u2019s length and contentious settlement\n\nnegotiations among experienced and capable counsel with a comprehensive understanding of the\n\nmerits and value of the claims asserted. With the assistance of an experienced mediator, counsel\n\nmet for an all-day mediation session to vigorously debate the strengths and weaknesses of the\n\nclaims and defenses. The Parties came to an agreement in principle at the mediation session and\n\nthereafter agreed to the terms and procedures reflected in the Stipulation. Lead Counsel\u2019s ability\n\nto come to a compromise early in light of the many complex issues and competing factions\n\npresent in this Action evidences the skill of representation and the quality of the results.\n\n 8. Pursuant to the Preliminary Approval Order, beginning on October 15, 2024, the\n\nPostcard Notice has been mailed to 21,714 potential Class Members and nominees, and the\n\nNotice and Claim Form were made available on the designated settlement website,\n\n\n\n\n 2\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 4 of 28\n\n\n\n\nwww.AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com, along with the Stipulation and Preliminary Approval\n\nOrder. See Declaration of Anne-Marie Marra of Simpluris Regarding Notice and Settlement\n\nAdministration (\u201cMarra Declaration\u201d or \u201cMarra Decl.\u201d) \u00b6\u00b68-14, 17-18. The Summary Notice\n\nwas published in Investor\u2019s Business Daily and transmitted over PR Newswire on October 28,\n\n2024. Marra Decl. \u00b6\u00b615-16, Exs. E-F.\n\n 9. Throughout the litigation, Lead Counsel has adeptly navigated the complicated\n\nissues of law and fact inherent in a securities class action. The Settlement provides an immediate\n\nand certain benefit to the Settlement Class considering the significant risks that a smaller\n\nrecovery\u2014or, indeed, no recovery at all\u2014might be achieved after a trial and the likely appeals\n\nthat would follow, which could prolong the Action for years and incur significant additional\n\nexpenses.\n\n 10. Lead Counsel also respectfully requests that the Court approve the Plan of\n\nAllocation for the Settlement proceeds, an award of attorneys\u2019 fees in the amount of $840,000,\n\nplus accrued interest, and reimbursement of expenses in the amount of $62,475.24. The fee\n\naward constitutes 28% of the Settlement Fund, which is in line with the amount of attorneys\u2019\n\nfees awarded by courts in this Circuit and is reasonable in light of the relevant factors, including\n\nthe quality of the representation, the complexity of the Action, and the risks of representing the\n\nSettlement Class in this Action. The expenses incurred by Lead Counsel were reasonable and\n\nnecessary to prosecute this Action and to reach this favorable result for the Settlement Class.\n\nII. SUMMARY OF PLAINTIFFS\u2019 CLAIMS\n\n 11. This Action arises out of Defendants\u2019 allegedly misleading statements and\n\nomissions that are alleged to violate \u00a7\u00a710(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934\n\n\n\n\n 3\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 5 of 28\n\n\n\n\n(\u201cExchange Act\u201d), 15 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a778j(b) and 78t(a), and U.S. Securities and Exchange\n\nCommission (\u201cSEC\u201d) Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. \u00a7240.10b-5. See Amended Class Action Complaint\n\n(\u201cAC\u201d), ECF No. 57.\n\n 12. During the Class Period (December 29, 2020 to August 2, 2022), Ampio was a\n\npre-revenue stage biopharmaceutical company. AC \u00b6\u00b61, 3, 40. Its lead product candidate,\n\nAmpion\u00ae, was being developed to treat osteoarthritis of the knee (\u201cOAK\u201d). AC \u00b63.\n\n 13. Briefly, the AC alleges that Defendants materially misrepresented and omitted\n\nmaterial facts regarding, inter alia, the latest trial of Ampion. See generally AC. Plaintiffs\n\nallege that Defendants knowingly and/or recklessly made the challenged statements while\n\nomitting that Ampio employees engaged in serious misconduct by prematurely viewing the drug\n\ntrial results and distributing Ampion for a use that had not been approved by the FDA. See, e.g.,\n\nid. at \u00b62.\n\n 14. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants violated the double-blind testing protocols to\n\nprematurely find out that Ampion was ineffective and then, with the board member defendants\u2019\n\nparticipation, improperly sought to monetize Ampion by approving its use outside the clinical\n\ntrials and without U.S. Food and Drug Administration (\u201cFDA\u201d) approval.\n\n 15. Meanwhile, the AC alleges that Defendants maintained, inter alia, that the trial\n\nremain blinded, that they believed the AP-013 Trial would be successful, that other drug\n\nmanufacturing companies were interested in partnering with Ampio for the distribution of\n\nAmpion, and that Ampio\u2019s employees were acting ethically and lawfully.\n\n 16. Plaintiffs allege that the truth of Defendants\u2019 actions leaked out in a series of\n\ndisclosures beginning in April 2022, when the FDA rejected the Company\u2019s attempt to salvage\n\n\n\n\n 4\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 6 of 28\n\n\n\n\nthe failed trial by claiming there was a subgroup of patients for whom Ampion was effective.\n\nAC \u00b6\u00b610-11. This revelation was followed by the disclosure that the Company formed a special\n\ncommittee to investigate improper practices with respect to Ampion, which culminated in the\n\nAugust 3, 2022 bombshell confirmation of certain executive officers\u2019 and directors\u2019 misconduct\n\nand the admission that Ampion was ineffective for OAK and that its development was being\n\ndiscontinued. AC \u00b6\u00b612-16.\n\n 17. Plaintiffs allege that each disclosure of material new information to investors\n\nabout Ampion and the Company\u2019s improper practices caused material drops in Ampio\u2019s stock\n\nprice from a Class Period high of $2.49 on February 12, 2021 to $0.10 at the close of the Class\n\nPeriod. AC \u00b6\u00b610-16, 152, 156.\n\n 18. A few months after the Class Period, the SEC launched an investigation into\n\nAmpio\u2019s wrongdoing and potential violations of the federal securities laws. AC \u00b6\u00b617, 119.\n\n 19. Defendants have denied and continue to deny each and all of the claims alleged\n\nby Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class. See Stip. 5 \u00b6J.\n\nIII. PROCEDURAL HISTORY\n\n 20. The Action began on August 17, 2022, when the initial class action complaint was\n\nfiled. ECF No. 1.\n\n 21. On October 17, 2022, six motions for appointment as lead plaintiff were filed in\n\naccordance with the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (\u201cPSLRA\u201d), 15 U.S.C.\n\n\u00a778u-4. On August 9, 2023, the Court appointed Mr. Wang and Synworld as Lead Plaintiffs,\n\nand their counsel, the Faruqi Firm, was appointed Lead Counsel. ECF No. 42.\n\n\n\n\n 5\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 7 of 28\n\n\n\n\n 22. On October 16, 2023, Plaintiffs filed the AC. ECF No. 57. When developing the\n\nclaims in the AC, Lead Counsel conducted an extensive investigation into the facts alleged in the\n\nAction. This included, inter alia, working with a private investigator to reach out to potential\n\nconfidential witnesses to provide more insight into the claims; reviewing documents filed\n\npublicly with the SEC, press releases, news articles, financial information, analyst reports,\n\nconference call transcripts, and other public statements issued by or concerning Ampio; filing a\n\nFreedom of Information Act (\u201cFOIA\u201d) request with the FDA for information related to Ampion;\n\nand scouring the FDA\u2019s website for relevant information.\n\nIV. THE SETTLEMENT\n\n A. Settlement Negotiations\n\n 23. Shortly after the AC was filed, the Parties discussed Ampio\u2019s financial condition\n\nand concerns about its ability to remain a going concern and reached an agreement to\n\nexpeditiously seek to take the case to mediation. Prior to engaging in settlement negotiations,\n\nLead Counsel spent considerable time evaluating the facts and arguments available in this\n\nAction. In addition to conducting an extensive investigation into the facts alleged, Lead Counsel\n\nconducted a thorough review of Ampio\u2019s SEC filings and public disclosures to gauge the\n\nCompany\u2019s financial condition and prospects. Lead Counsel also conferred with a damages\n\nexpert, conducted complex legal research for and drafted a mediation statement, and reviewed\n\nDefendants\u2019 mediation statements and conducted further research into their possible defenses.\n\n 24. With the benefit of this investigation and comprehensive analysis of the factual\n\nand legal issues in this Action, all Parties entered settlement negotiations well-informed of the\n\nstrengths and weaknesses of the claims and defenses asserted in this Action.\n\n\n\n\n 6\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 8 of 28\n\n\n\n\n 25. On January 4, 2024, the Parties participated in an all-day mediation session before\n\nRobert E. Meyer of JAMS, a well-respected and highly experienced mediator, to explore a\n\npotential negotiated resolution of the Action\u2019s claims. The mediation resulted in the Parties\n\nreaching an agreement-in-principle to settle and release the claims in the Action, subject to the\n\ncompletion of confirmatory discovery.\n\n 26. Following the mediation, Lead Counsel negotiated the scope of document\n\nproduction, a confidentiality agreement to govern confirmatory discovery, and conducting\n\ninterviews of Ampio representatives. Thereafter, Lead Counsel reviewed over 25,000 documents\n\nprovided by Defendants. Lead Counsel also interviewed two Ampio representatives to discuss\n\nthe Company\u2019s financial condition and prospects as well as the AC\u2019s allegations and the\n\nDefendants\u2019 defenses.\n\n 27. The confirmatory discovery following the mediation reinforced concerns about\n\nthe risks facing the litigation, particularly with respect to the funds available to fund a settlement\n\nor judgment. For example, one of the Ampio representatives interviewed confirmed that Ampio\n\nis \u201cwinding down\u201d operations to the \u201cbare bones\u201d to preserve cash with no plans to seek further\n\nsources of capital.\n\n 28. This dire state of affairs was echoed in subsequent SEC filings. For example, the\n\nCompany\u2019s annual report for 2023 revealed that as of December 31 of that year, Ampio\u2019s only\n\nsource of liquidity was $4.1 million of cash and cash equivalents and $0.9 million of an\n\ninsurance recovery receivable. See Annual Report 8 (Form 10-K) (Mar. 27, 2024) (\u201c2023 10-\n\nK\u201d). These amounts decreased to $3.4 million and $0.5 million, respectively, as of February 29,\n\n2024. Id. Meanwhile, Ampio was also facing two consolidated federal derivative actions, a state\n\n\n\n\n 7\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 9 of 28\n\n\n\n\ncourt derivative case, and an SEC investigation, which are reducing the insurance available to\n\nfund any settlement of this Action. See 2023 10-K at 8-9.\n\n 29. Taken together, the confirmatory discovery produced to Plaintiffs and Ampio\u2019s\n\npublic filings fully supported Plaintiffs\u2019 decision to settle and confirms the Settlement\u2019s fairness,\n\nadequacy, and reasonableness. Following Lead Counsel\u2019s review of the confirmatory discovery,\n\nthe Parties were able to negotiate the complete terms of the Settlement, which are memorialized\n\nin the Stipulation.\n\n B. Reasons for the Settlement\n\n 30. Lead Counsel strongly believes that the claims asserted in this Action are\n\nmeritorious and that the evidence developed to date supports those claims. That said, Lead\n\nCounsel recognizes that additional time and expense would be necessary in order to bring this\n\ncase to trial.\n\n 31. For example, without the Settlement, the Parties would have had to brief\n\nDefendants\u2019 motions to dismiss. Plaintiffs anticipate that Defendants would argue, inter alia,\n\nthat any alleged misstatements were immaterial, lacked falsity, and that the AC failed to plead\n\nthat Defendants acted with the requisite scienter.\n\n 32. Even if Plaintiffs\u2019 claims survived the motions to dismiss, the briefing would\n\nrequire a great deal of time and effort from both sides, leading to increased expenses and further\n\ndraining Ampio\u2019s available funds.\n\n 33. The Parties would then need to spend a significant amount of time engaging in a\n\nfact discovery process that would likely be timing consuming and expensive. For example, the\n\nAC alleges, inter alia, that certain defendants had access to information about the Ampion trial\n\n\n\n\n 8\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 10 of 28\n\n\n\n\ndata and distributed the drug to third parties without proper authorization, in violation of FDA\n\nrules and regulations. See, e.g., AC \u00b6\u00b66-7. The AC also alleges that the SEC launched an\n\ninvestigation into Ampio\u2019s conduct. Id. at \u00b617. Thus, the discovery process would require,\n\namong other things, subpoenas to any third-party drug recipients, former Ampio employees,\n\nclinical trial vendors and facilities, many of which may be subject to the Health Insurance\n\nPortability and Accountability Act (\u201cHIPAA\u201d) limitations; the retention of expert witnesses\n\nregarding technical issues about the relevant FDA rules and regulations; discovery motion\n\npractice; production and review of thousands of pages of documents; and taking numerous\n\ndepositions.\n\n 34. Obtaining the necessary discovery is further complicated here by the passing of\n\ndefendant Michael Macaluso, as Plaintiffs will not be able to obtain from him any interrogatory\n\nresponses or deposition testimony. See ECF No. 53.\n\n 35. Even if the Action proceeded to the summary judgment stage, there is no\n\nguarantee Plaintiffs\u2019 claims would survive. If Plaintiffs\u2019 claims were to survive summary\n\njudgment, there is no certainty of a favorable jury verdict, and even then, this case may present\n\nnovel issues on appeal with an uncertain outcome and if they did, there is also a risk that the jury\n\nmight be swayed by Defendants\u2019 theory of the case at trial.\n\n 36. Were Plaintiffs to prevail through trial and appeals, there is an extremely high\n\nchance that no money would be available to fund a judgment, as discussed above. The\n\nSettlement, by contrast, represents an immediate and certain benefit for the Settlement Class.\n\nLead Counsel, having evaluated the substantial risk, time, and expenses required to prosecute\n\n\n\n\n 9\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 11 of 28\n\n\n\n\nthis Action through trial and any appeals, strongly believes that the Settlement is a favorable\n\nresult for the Settlement Class.\n\n C. The Settlement Terms\n\n 37. The Settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved, provides for the gross\n\npayment of $3,000,000 to secure a settlement of the claims asserted in the Action against\n\nDefendants. If approved, the Settlement will finally resolve Plaintiffs\u2019 allegations against\n\nDefendants and release all Released Claims against them in the Action.\n\n 38. As part of the Settlement, Defendants have denied liability and any wrongdoing.\n\n 39. All eligible Settlement Class Members who timely submit a valid Claim Form and\n\nare eligible to receive at least $10.00 will receive a distribution from the Net Settlement Fund,\n\nwhich is the Settlement Fund minus administration expenses, Lead Counsel\u2019s fees and expenses,\n\nany award to Plaintiffs, and any Taxes and Tax Expenses.\n\n 40. Based on this declaration and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying\n\nmemoranda, Lead Counsel respectfully submits that the terms of the Settlement and the Plan of\n\nAllocation are fair, reasonable, and adequate law, and the possible defenses to the claims\n\nasserted in this Action.\n\nV. THE COURT\u2019S PRELIMINARY APPROVAL ORDER AND PLAINTIFFS\u2019\n DISSEMINATION OF THE NOTICE\n\n A. Preliminary Approval Order\n\n 41. On May 13, 2024, Plaintiffs filed the Preliminary Approval Motion, seeking\n\npreliminary approval of the Settlement, approval of the manner and content of the proposed\n\nnotice, and scheduling of the Settlement Hearing. See ECF No. 94.\n\n 42. On September 24, 2024, the Court issued the Preliminary Approval Order, which:\n\n\n\n\n 10\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 12 of 28\n\n\n\n\n (a) granted preliminary approval of the Stipulation and the Settlement set forth\n\n therein, subject to further consideration at the Settlement Hearing;\n\n (b) for purposes of settlement only, preliminarily certified the Action as a class action\n\n on behalf of the Class, appointed Plaintiffs as Class Representatives and Lead\n\n Counsel as Class Counsel;\n\n (c) scheduled a Settlement Hearing for February 19, 2025 at 10:30 a.m. to determine\n\n whether: (i) the proposed Settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate and should\n\n be finally approved by the Court; (ii) a Judgment should be entered dismissing the\n\n Action with prejudice; (iii) the proposed Plan of Allocation is fair, reasonable, and\n\n adequate and should be approved; (iv) determine the amount of fees and expenses\n\n to be awarded to Lead Counsel; (v) determine any award to Plaintiffs pursuant to\n\n 15 U.S.C. \u00a778u-4(a)(4); (vi) hear and determine any objections to the Settlement;\n\n and (vii) rule on such other matters as the Court may deem appropriate.\n\n (d) approved the form and content of the Postcard Notice, Notice, Claim Form, and\n\n Summary Notice, and found that the mailing and distribution of those documents\n\n substantially in the manner set forth in \u00b6\u00b610-13 of the Preliminary Approval\n\n Order met the requirements of Rule 23, the PSLRA, and due process, and is the\n\n best notice practicable under the circumstances, and shall constitute due and\n\n sufficient notice to all Persons entitled thereto;\n\n (e) approved Simpluris as the Claims Administrator to administer the notice program\n\n and process claims;\n\n\n\n\n 11\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 13 of 28\n\n\n\n\n (f) established procedures and deadlines for Class Members to submit Claim Forms\n\n or seek exclusion; and\n\n (g) established procedures and deadlines for Class Members to object to the\n\n Settlement, Plan of Allocation, and/or the application for an award of attorneys\u2019\n\n fees, expenses, and an award to Plaintiffs.\n\n B. Notice\n\n 43. Pursuant to the Preliminary Approval Order, Lead Counsel is serving on\n\nDefendants\u2019 counsel and filing with the Court the Marra Declaration, concurrently herewith.\n\nThe Marra Declaration sets forth the efforts undertaken by Simpluris to mail the Postcard Notice\n\nto Class Members, to publish the Summary Notice, and to establish the website and toll-free\n\ntelephone line.\n\n 44. As detailed in the Marra Declaration, beginning on October 15, 2024, Simpluris\n\nmailed or caused to be mailed a total of 21,714 Postcard Notices to potential Settlement Class\n\nMembers and nominees. See Marra Decl. \u00b6\u00b6 8-14. The Summary Notice was posted by PR\n\nNewswire and published in Investors\u2019 Business Daily on October 28, 2024. See id. at \u00b6\u00b6 15-16,\n\nExs. E-F.\n\n 45. Additionally, Simpluris established a telephone helpline to accommodate\n\npotential Settlement Class Members who have questions about the Settlement. See id. at \u00b618.\n\n 46. Simpluris also set up the website, www.AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com, to\n\nprovide information about the proposed Settlement to Settlement Class Members and others. See\n\nid. at \u00b617. The website makes available for viewing and downloading important documents,\n\nincluding the Notice, Claim Form, Preliminary Approval Order, Stipulation, and other case-\n\n\n\n\n 12\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 14 of 28\n\n\n\n\nrelated documents. See id. The website also lists the exclusion, objection, and claim filing\n\ndeadlines for this Action as well as the date and time of the Settlement Hearing. See id.\n\n 47. As required by Rule 23, due process, and the PSLRA, the Notice: (a) described\n\nthe nature of the claims asserted in the Action; (b) included the case caption; (c) included a\n\ndefinition of the Settlement Class; (d) summarized the Settling Parties\u2019 reasons for entering into\n\nthe Settlement; (e) listed the name, telephone number, and address for Lead Counsel; (f)\n\ndisclosed that Lead Counsel intends to seek attorneys\u2019 fees of up to 28% of the Settlement Fund,\n\nand reimbursement of expenses not to exceed $75,000, plus accrued interest, and an award to\n\nPlaintiffs not to exceed $5,000; (g) provided the date, time, and location of the Settlement\n\nHearing; (h) advised Settlement Class Members of their right to appear at the Settlement Hearing\n\nand instructed them that the date may change; (i) advised Settlement Class Members of their\n\nright to exclude themselves from the Settlement Class and the binding effect of doing so; (j)\n\nprovided the deadline and procedure for opting out of or opposing the Settlement, Plan of\n\nAllocation, or award of attorneys\u2019 fees and expenses to Lead Counsel; (k) explained the\n\nconsequences of remaining in the Settlement Class; (l) provided the manner in which to obtain\n\nmore information, including the address for the designated website; and (m) explained how to\n\naccess the case docket at the courthouse or on PACER. See Marra Decl., Ex. B.\n\n C. Reaction of the Settlement Class\n\n 48. The Notices provide that objections to the Settlement, Plan of Allocation, and/or\n\nthe application for attorneys\u2019 fees, expenses, and award for Plaintiffs must be received no later\n\nthan January 29, 2025. See Marra Decl., Ex. B at 2, 11-12, 13. Objections are to be filed with\n\nthe Court and mailed or otherwise delivered to Plaintiffs\u2019 and Defendants\u2019 Counsel. Id. at 13.\n\n\n\n\n 13\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 15 of 28\n\n\n\n\n 49. Although 21,714 Postcard Notices have been mailed to potential Settlement Class\n\nMembers and nominees (see id. \u00b6\u00b68-13), as of December 23, 2024, no requests for exclusion\n\nfrom or objection(s) to the Settlement have been received. See id. \u00b6\u00b619-20. No objection(s) to\n\nthe Plan of Allocation, the attorneys\u2019 fee award, Plaintiffs\u2019 award, and/or the requested\n\nreimbursement of expenses have been received either. See id.\n\n 50. If any objections or requests for exclusion are received, they will be addressed in\n\nPlaintiffs\u2019 reply papers.\n\n D. Plan of Allocation\n\n 51. Pursuant to the Preliminary Approval Order, and as explained in the Notice, all\n\nSettlement Class Members who wish to participate in the Settlement must submit a Claim Form\n\nwith supporting documentation to Simpluris so that it is postmarked or submitted electronically\n\nno later than January 13, 2025. See Marra Decl., Ex. B at 2, 8.\n\n 52. As set forth in the Notice, all Settlement Class Members who timely file a valid\n\nClaim Form and whose pro rata share of the Net Settlement Fund amounts to $10.00 or more\n\nwill receive a distribution of the Settlement proceeds, after deduction of, inter alia, attorneys\u2019\n\nfees and expenses, Plaintiffs\u2019 award and taxes incurred on the Settlement Fund. See Marra Decl.,\n\nEx. B at 8, 16-20. The distribution will be made in accordance with the Plan of Allocation set\n\nforth and described in detail in the Notice. See id.\n\n 53. The objective of the Plan of Allocation is to equitably distribute the Net\n\nSettlement Fund among Authorized Claimants who suffered economic loss as a result of\n\nDefendants\u2019 alleged misconduct as opposed to losses caused by market or industry factors not\n\nrelated to the alleged fraud. See, e.g., Marra Decl., Ex. B at 16.\n\n\n\n\n 14\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 16 of 28\n\n\n\n\n 54. Under the Plan of Allocation, the Claims Administrator will calculate each\n\nAuthorized Claimant\u2019s Recognized Loss, as explained in the Notice. See Marra Decl., Ex. B at\n\n16-20. The calculation of a Recognized Loss will depend on several factors, including when the\n\nshares of Ampio common stock were purchased during the Settlement Class Period, and for what\n\namounts, and whether such shares were sold, and if sold, when they were sold, and for what\n\namounts. See id. at 16. The Claims Administrator will use the Recognized Loss formula to\n\ndetermine each Authorized Claimant\u2019s pro rata share to proportionately allocate the Net\n\nSettlement Fund among the Authorized U.S. Claimants. See id. at 16-20.\n\n 55. The Plan of Allocation was formulated with the assistance of Lead Counsel\u2019s\n\ndamages consultant, and it tracks the theory of damages alleged in the AC. It was also reviewed\n\nand approved by Simpluris, a claims administrator with substantial experience in claims\n\nadministration.\n\n 56. The terms of the Plan of Allocation were fully disclosed in the Notice which was\n\nmade available on this Action\u2019s designated website beginning on October 15, 2024. See Marra\n\nDecl. \u00b617. To date, there have been zero objections to the Plan of Allocation. See id. Therefore,\n\nPlaintiffs respectfully submit that it is fair, reasonable, and adequate, and should be approved by\n\nthe Court.\n\nVI. LEAD COUNSEL\u2019S APPLICATION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS\u2019 FEES\n AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES\n\n A. Attorneys\u2019 Fees\n\n 57. Lead Counsel has represented the Settlement Class on a wholly contingent basis\n\nfor over a year. To date, Lead Counsel has received no payment for its services or the expenses\n\nincurred in prosecuting this Action against Defendants and negotiating the Settlement.\n\n\n\n 15\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 17 of 28\n\n\n\n\nThroughout this time, Lead Counsel\u2019s dedication to recovering a favorable result for the\n\nSettlement Class has been expensive and challenging.\n\n 58. The Notices informed Settlement Class Members that Lead Counsel will apply for\n\nan award of attorneys\u2019 fees of up to 28% of the Settlement Fund and reimbursement of expenses\n\nnot to exceed $75,000, plus accrued interest.2\n\n 59. Lead Counsel requests that the Court award a fee of 28% of the Settlement Fund,\n\nor $840,000, plus accrued interest.\n\n 60. As discussed in the Fee Motion, filed concurrently herewith, seeking an award of\n\nattorneys\u2019 fees in an amount of 28% of the Settlement Fund is in line with similar awards granted\n\nin this Circuit. In light of the favorable result achieved for the Settlement Class, the skill\n\nrequired, the quality of work performed, the risk of pursuing claims on a contingency basis, and\n\nthe amount of time and resources Lead Counsel has dedicated to this Action, Lead Counsel\n\nrespectfully submits that a fee of 28% of the Settlement Fund is justified and should be\n\napproved.\n\n 61. According to Plaintiffs\u2019 consulting damages expert, the $3,000,000 Settlement\n\nAmount recovers approximately 14% of the maximum potential damages available in the Action\n\n(assuming the proposed Class is certified and all claims and damages are proven). This is\n\nsubstantially higher than the median ratio of settlement to investor losses for recent securities\n\nclass action settlements, which NERA determined was 1.8% for 2023, and the median settlement\n\n\n\n2\n Lead Counsel\u2019s request for interest accrued on the fee and expense amounts is limited to\nthe interest or income earned on those amounts between the time the Settlement Amount was\ndeposited into the Escrow Account to the time the fees and expenses are permitted to be\ndisbursed.\n\n\n 16\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 18 of 28\n\n\n\n\nvalue for settlements where investor losses were between $20-49 million, which NERA\n\ndetermined was 5.1% ECF No. 95-3 at 25-26. This percentage is also well within the range of\n\nCourt-approved recoveries in complex securities class actions such as this. Based on\n\nDefendants\u2019 adamant denials of any liability, as well as the substantial time and expense of\n\ncontinued litigation, this Settlement Amount represents a favorable recovery for the Settlement\n\nClass.\n\n 62. Lead Counsel\u2019s expertise and persistence have been vital to obtaining this result\n\nfor the Settlement Class. As set forth in its firm resume, attached as Exhibit 1 hereto, the Faruqi\n\nFirm is a nationally recognized class action firm with extensive experience litigating and\n\nnegotiating settlements as lead or co-lead counsel in complex securities class actions.\n\n 63. In order to reach a successful resolution of this Action, Lead Counsel was\n\nrequired to litigate the case zealously because Defendants were represented by several\n\nexperienced firms, including Ballard Spahr LLP, Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck LLP,\n\nPillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Holland & Hart LLP, Foley & Lardner LLP, and Hilgers\n\nGraben PLLC. All of these firms defended their clients vigorously.\n\n 64. As evidenced by the Faruqi Time Report, a true and correct copy of which is\n\nattached hereto as Exhibit 2, throughout the litigation, Lead Counsel has committed 1,152.3\n\nhours to prosecuting this Action. This includes time spent, inter alia: (1) conducting an\n\nextensive investigation, as well as reviewing press releases, online and newspaper articles, SEC\n\nfilings, conference call transcripts, and stock price movements; (2) filing a FOIA request with the\n\nFDA; (3) conducting research for and briefing the contested lead plaintiff motion; (4)\n\ncorresponding with Defendants\u2019 counsel regarding scheduling and other matters; (5) preparing a\n\n\n\n\n 17\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 19 of 28\n\n\n\n\ndetailed amended complaint; (6) conducting complex legal research in connection with drafting\n\nthe amended complaint and preparing for settlement negotiations, including gaining an\n\nunderstanding of the applicable scientific concepts and FDA regulations in play; (7) consulting\n\nwith a damages expert to better understand the issues facing recovery for the class; (8) drafting\n\nthe mediation statement and reviewing Defendants\u2019 mediation statements in advance of the\n\nmediation to better understand the strengths and weaknesses of Plaintiffs\u2019 case and Defendants\u2019\n\ndefenses; (9) communicating with Plaintiffs throughout the Action; (10) conducting research for\n\nand filed the Motion for an Extension of Time to File a Motion for Substitution of defendant\n\nMichael Macaluso pursuant to Rule 25(a)(1) (ECF No. 83); (11) engaging in a mediation session\n\nand corresponding with Defendants thereafter regarding confirmatory discovery; (12) reviewing\n\nover 25,000 documents provided in confirmatory discovery and taking interviews of two Ampio\n\nrepresentatives; (13) drafting the Settlement Stipulation, Notices, and related materials; and (14)\n\ndrafting the preliminary approval papers.\n\n 65. Based upon the hours expended by Lead Counsel and the current billing rates for\n\nLead Counsel\u2019s professionals, the total lodestar is $756,157.50. The lodestar results in a modest\n\nmultiplier of 1.11.\n\n 66. The Faruqi Firm\u2019s time, set forth in Exhibit 2, is taken from daily time records\n\nregularly prepared and maintained by the Faruqi Firm in the ordinary course of business. I\n\nreviewed the firm\u2019s time records in connection with the preparation of this declaration. The\n\npurpose of this review was to confirm the accuracy, necessity for, and reasonableness of, the\n\ntime committed to the litigation, and to make reductions where appropriate. As a result of this\n\n\n\n\n 18\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 20 of 28\n\n\n\n\nreview, I believe that the time reflected in the Faruqi Firm\u2019s lodestar calculation is reasonable\n\nand was necessary for the effective and efficient prosecution and resolution of the litigation.\n\n 67. The total number of hours reasonably and necessarily spent by the Faruqi Firm in\n\nthis Action is 1,152.3 hours. The Faruqi Firm\u2019s hourly billing rates range from $700 to $1,050\n\nfor partners, $450 to $575 for associates, $350 for law clerks, and $325 to $375 for paralegals.\n\nThe total lodestar amount for attorney and support staff time, based on the Faruqi Firm\u2019s current\n\nrates, is $756,157.50. The hourly rates for attorneys and support staff in the Faruqi Firm,\n\nincluded in Exhibit 2, are reasonable for complex securities class actions and the expertise of the\n\nattorneys.\n\n 68. Lead Counsel will also devote additional hours and resources to this Action on an\n\nongoing basis, including, inter alia: preparing for and participating in the Settlement Hearing;\n\nassisting potential Settlement Class Members with the completion and submission of their Claim\n\nForms; monitoring the claims process; corresponding with the Claims Administrator; drafting\n\nand filing a motion for distribution of the Net Settlement Fund; and supervising the distribution\n\nof the Net Settlement Fund to Settlement Class Members.\n\n 69. A brief description of the qualifications and experience for each individual for\n\nwhom fees are claimed is set forth below. The case-related contributions of each person is\n\nillustrated on page 1 of Exhibit 2, as it sets forth how much time each person spent on each part\n\nof the litigation.\n\n (a) Nadeem Faruqi: Nadeem Faruqi is a Managing Partner of the Faruqi Firm and\n\n oversees all aspects of the firm\u2019s practice areas. He has over 30 years of\n\n experience in civil litigation, and has served as sole or co-lead counsel in many\n\n\n\n\n 19\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 21 of 28\n\n\n\n\n notable securities cases. Additional information about Mr. Faruqi\u2019s qualifications\n\n and experience is set forth in the Faruqi Firm Resume. See Exhibit 1 at 13-14.\n\n (b) James M. Wilson, Jr.: Mr. Wilson is a Partner of the Faruqi Firm and Co-Chair of\n\n the firm\u2019s Securities Litigation Practice Group. He has over 30 years of\n\n experience in civil litigation and over 20 years of experience representing\n\n investors in securities class actions in particular. Additional information about\n\n Mr. Wilson\u2019s qualifications and experience is set forth in the Faruqi Firm\n\n Resume. See Exhibit 1 at 18.\n\n (c) Robert W. Killorin. Mr. Killorin is a Partner of the Faruqi Firm, Co-Chair of the\n\n firm\u2019s Securities Litigation Practice Group, and a member of the firm\u2019s\n\n Institutional Investor Practice Group. He has over 35 years of experience in civil\n\n litigation, and has focused much of his career representing investors in\n\n shareholder merger and securities litigation. Additional information about Mr.\n\n Killorin\u2019s qualifications and experience is set forth in the Faruqi Firm Resume.\n\n See Exhibit 1 at 18-19.\n\n (d) Katherine M. Lenahan: Ms. Lenahan is a Partner of the Faruqi Firm. She has\n\n over 10 years of experience representing investors in securities class action\n\n litigation. Additional information about Ms. Lenahan\u2019s qualifications and\n\n experience is set forth in the Faruqi Firm Resume. See Exhibit 1 at 22-23.\n\n (e) Megan M. Remmel: Ms. Remmel was a Partner of the Faruqi Firm during this\n\n Action\u2019s pendency. She has over 10 years of experience representing investors in\n\n\n\n\n 20\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 22 of 28\n\n\n\n\n securities class action litigation. Ms. Remmel graduated from Brooklyn Law\n\n School (J.D., cum laude) in 2011.\n\n (f) Thomas Papain: Mr. Papain was an associate of the Faruqi Firm during this\n\n Action\u2019s pendency, where he focused his practice on securities litigation. Mr.\n\n Papain has over 9 years of experience in civil litigation. Mr. Papain earned his\n\n J.D. from Fordham University School of Law in 2012.\n\n (g) Dylan B. Weeks: Mr. Weeks was an associate of the Faruqi Firm during this\n\n Action\u2019s pendency. He earned his J.D. from Brooklyn Law School in 2014.\n\n During his time at the Faruqi Firm, Mr. Weeks focused his practice on securities\n\n litigation. Prior to joining the Faruqi Firm, Mr. Weeks was a litigation Associate\n\n at a boutique law firm focusing on the defense of high-exposure construction\n\n claims and general liability matters.\n\n (h) Matthew A. Conrad: Mr. Conrad is an associate of the Faruqi Firm, where he\n\n focuses his practice on securities litigation. Mr. Conrad has 6 years of experience\n\n in civil litigation. Additional information about his qualifications and experience\n\n can be found in Exhibit 1 at 27.\n\n (i) Thanh Hoang: Ms. Hoang is an associate of the Faruqi Firm, where she focuses\n\n her practice on securities litigation. Ms. Hoang has 3 years of experience in\n\n litigation. Additional information about her qualifications and experience can be\n\n found in Exhibit 1 at 28-29.\n\n (j) Kayla Kershen: Ms. Kershen was a law clerk at the Faruqi Firm during this\n\n Action\u2019s pendency, where she focused on securities litigation. Prior to joining the\n\n\n\n\n 21\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 23 of 28\n\n\n\n\n Faruqi Firm, Ms. Kershen interned with a prominent plaintiff-side securities\n\n litigation firm where she gained exposure to complex class actions. Ms. Kershen\n\n earned her J.D. from Brooklyn Law School in 2023, where she was awarded the\n\n Carswell Merit Scholarship and the Evelyn Gross Scholarship.\n\n (k) Derek Behnke: Mr. Behnke earned his B.A. in English from New York\n\n University in 2001 and began working as a law firm paralegal shortly after\n\n graduation. Mr. Behnke has been a paralegal with the Faruqi Firm since 2013 and\n\n has served as the firm\u2019s head paralegal in numerous securities cases throughout\n\n the years.\n\n (l) Anthony Aloise: Mr. Aloise has been a paralegal at the Faruqi Firm since April\n\n 2015. He graduated from the University of Richmond in 2000 with a B.A. in\n\n Theatre and a B.S. in Marketing.\n\n (m) Nicholas Halloran: Mr. Halloran has been a paralegal with the Faruqi Firm since\n\n September 2021. He graduated from Fordham University\u2019s Gabelli School of\n\n Business (Finance Major) in May 2019.\n\n (n) Christian Carrano: Mr. Carrano started with the Faruqi Firm in March 2021 and\n\n served as a paralegal there during the pendency of this Action. He graduated\n\n from Fordham University\u2019s Gabelli School of Business with a degree in Finance\n\n in 2019. He graduated from St. John\u2019s University with an MBA, Business\n\n Analytics in 2021.\n\n\n\n\n 22\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 24 of 28\n\n\n\n\n (o) Evelyn Zheng: Ms. Zheng started with the Faruqi Firm in May 2023 and was a\n\n paralegal there during the pendency of this action. She graduated from Stony\n\n Brook University with an M.A. in Bioethics.\n\n B. Expenses\n\n 70. The expenses incurred by Lead Counsel in the prosecution of the Action are set\n\nforth in the accompanying Expense Report from the Faruqi Firm, a true and correct copy of\n\nwhich is attached hereto as Exhibit 3.\n\n 71. The Faruqi Firm\u2019s Expense Report provides that it has incurred $62,475.24 in\n\nexpenses, and expects to incur an additional $4,000.00 related to travel expenses in connection\n\nwith the Settlement Hearing, for a total of $66,475.24.\n\n 72. The expenses in the Faruqi Firm\u2019s Expense Report are taken from the books and\n\nrecords of the Faruqi Firm maintained in the ordinary course of business. The books and records\n\nare prepared from expense vouchers, check records, and other such documents. I reviewed the\n\nFaruqi Firm\u2019s expense records in connection with the preparation of this declaration. The\n\npurpose of this review was to confirm the accuracy, necessity for, and reasonableness of the\n\nlitigation expenses, and remove any expenses that did not meet these criteria. As a result of this\n\nreview, I believe that the expenses reflected in the Faruqi Firm\u2019s Expense Report are reasonable\n\nand were necessary for the effective and efficient prosecution and resolution of the Action and\n\nare of the type that would normally be charged to a fee-paying client in the private legal\n\nmarketplace.\n\n 73. Some of the largest expenditures were the $16,106.50 in expenses incurred by the\n\nprivate fact investigator, $12,500 in mediation fees, and $7,160 in damages expert fees.\n\n\n\n\n 23\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 25 of 28\n\n\n\n\n 74. Lead Counsel hired the investigator to conduct a background fact investigation\n\nand to reach out to potential confidential witnesses to provide more insight into what was\n\nhappening at the Company during the Class Period. See, e.g., AC \u00b6\u00b636-39.\n\n 75. Lead Counsel also retained an economic consulting firm, Stanford Consulting\n\nGroup, Inc., to consult on the damages and loss causation issues present in the Action, and to\n\nassist with the preparation of the Plan of Allocation.\n\n 76. Lead Counsel respectfully submits that fees paid to the fact investigator, mediator,\n\nand damages consulting expert were reasonable and necessary to prosecute the Action to the\n\npoint at which it settled.\n\n 77. The remainder of Lead Counsel expenses, $26,708.74, reflect routine and typical\n\nexpenditures incurred during litigation, including but not limited to legal filings, court reporting\n\nfees, electronic research, photocopying, postage, and meals. All of these expenditures are the\n\ntypes of expenses incurred in similar class actions of this size and would be billed to a fee-paying\n\nclient.\n\n 78. The total expenses, $66,475.24, are less than the $75,000 in potential expenses\n\nthat the Notice informed the Settlement Class may be incurred. Lead Counsel respectfully\n\nsubmits that these expenses are reasonable in light of the pace and duration of the Action and\n\nwere necessarily incurred for its successful resolution. Lead Counsel understood that it might\n\nnot recover any expenses if the Action was dismissed, and therefore took steps to minimize costs\n\nwherever possible without jeopardizing its duty to zealously represent the Settlement Class.\n\n\n\n\n 24\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 26 of 28\n\n\n\n\n C. Award for Plaintiffs\n\n 79. Lead Counsel also respectfully requests that the Court grant an award of $5,000 to\n\nMr. Wang to reimburse him for his services as a representative of the Class.\n\n 80. As set forth in the Declaration of Tao Wang, attached hereto as Exhibit 4, he has\n\ntaken his and his Company\u2019s role as representatives of the Settlement Class very seriously.\n\nSince he and SynWorld were appointed Lead Plaintiffs on August 9, 2023, Mr. Wang has\n\ndedicated at least 50 hours of his time to the Action by:\n\n (a) engaging in numerous communications with Lead Counsel about this Action;\n\n (b) gathering documents for the lead plaintiff motion;\n\n (c) submitting a sworn certification and declaration regarding his and SynWorld\u2019s\n\n Ampio transactions, his background, and his understanding of the lead plaintiffs\u2019\n\n duties;\n\n (d) reviewing documents filed and/or prepared in the Action; and\n\n (e) consulting with counsel, participating in the day-long mediation, and providing\n\n input on the mediation and settlement negotiations.\n\nSee Ex. 4.\n\n 81. Thus, Mr. Wang actively and effectively complied with the demands that arose\n\nduring the litigation and settlement of this Action. The types of activities that Mr. Wang engaged\n\nin are precisely the type of efforts that courts have found support an award to class\n\nrepresentatives. Because he played an integral role in this Action, Lead Counsel respectfully\n\nsubmits that he should be reimbursed for the time and effort he devoted to actively representing\n\nthe Class in this Action.\n\n\n\n\n 25\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 27 of 28\n\n\n\n\nVII. LIST OF EXHIBITS\n\n 82. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of the Faruqi Firm\n\nResume.\n\n 83. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of the Faruqi Firm\u2019s Time\n\nReport.\n\n 84. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of the Faruqi Firm\u2019s\n\nExpense Report.\n\n 85. Attached hereto as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of the Declaration of Tao\n\nWang in Support of Lead Counsel\u2019s Motion for Attorneys\u2019 Fees, Expenses, and an Award to\n\nLead Plaintiff under 15 U.S.C. \u00a778u-4(a)(4).\n\n 86. Attached hereto as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of Ampio\u2019s Certificate of\n\nDissolution.\n\n I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my\n\nknowledge.\n\n Executed this 23rd day of December 2024 at New York, NY.\n\n\n /s/ James M. Wilson, Jr.\n James M. Wilson, Jr.\n\n\n\n\n 26\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 28 of 28\n\n\n\n\n CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE\n\n I, James M. Wilson, Jr., hereby certify that on December 23, 2024, I electronically filed\n\nthe foregoing with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of\n\nsuch filing to the e-mail addresses denoted on the Court\u2019s Electronic Mail Notice List.\n\n s/ James M. Wilson, Jr.\n James M. Wilson, Jr.\n\n\n\n\n 27\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2026-06-24T12:56:56.393059-07:00","document_number":"102","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"039011687983","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/483906360/","id":483906360,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/64904094/102/1/wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc/","date_created":"2026-06-24T12:56:52.981972-07:00","date_modified":"2026-06-25T03:41:27.136200-07:00","sha1":"1311ded0a5813fec03b5afac25adf1697fd3e6e1","page_count":30,"file_size":457090,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.102.1.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.102.1.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-1 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 1 of 30\n\n\n\n\n EXHIBIT 1\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-1 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 2 of 30\n\n\n\n\n Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP focuses on complex civil litigation, including securities, antitrust, wage and\n hour, consumer, and pharmaceutical class actions as well as shareholder derivative and merger and\n transactional litigation. The firm is headquartered in New York, and maintains offices in California,\n Pennsylvania and Georgia.\n Since its founding in 1995, Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP has served as lead or co-lead counsel in numerous\n high-profile cases which have provided significant recoveries to investors, consumers and employees.\n\n PRACTICE AREAS\n SECURITIES FRAUD LITIGATION\n From its inception, Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP has devoted a substantial portion of its practice to class\n action securities fraud litigation. In In re PurchasePro.com, Inc. Securities Litigation, No. CV-S-01-0483\n (JLQ) (D. Nev.), as co-lead counsel for the class, Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP secured a $24.2 million settlement\n in a securities fraud litigation even though the corporate defendant was in bankruptcy. As noted by Senior\n Judge Justin L. Quackenbush in approving the settlement, \u201cI feel that counsel for plaintiffs evidenced\n that they were and are skilled in the field of securities litigation.\u201d\n Other past achievements include: In re Olsten Corp. Sec. Litig., No. 97-CV-5056 (RDH) (E.D.N.Y.)\n (recovered $24.1 million dollars for class members) (Judge Hurley stated: \u201cThe quality of representation\n here I think has been excellent.\u201d), In re Tellium, Inc. Sec. Litig., No. 02-CV-5878 (FLW) (D.N.J.) (recovered\n $5.5 million dollars for class members); In re Mitcham Indus., Inc. Sec. Litig., No. H-98-1244 (S.D. Tex.)\n (recovered $3 million dollars for class members despite the fact that corporate defendant was on the verge\n of declaring bankruptcy), and Ruskin v. TIG Holdings, Inc., No. 98 Civ. 1068 LLS (S.D.N.Y.) (recovered $3\n million dollars for class members).\n Recently, Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, as sole lead counsel, won a historic appeal in the United States\n Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Zak v. Chelsea Therapeutics Inc. Int\u2019l, Ltd., Civ. No. 13-2730\n (2015), where the Court reversed a trial court\u2019s scienter ruling for the first time since the enactment of the\n Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (\u201cPSLRA\u201d). The Court remanded the case to the district\n court, where Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP defeated defendants\u2019 motion to dismiss and subsequently obtained\n final approval of a $5.5 million settlement for the class. McIntyre v. Chelsea Therapeutics Int\u2019l, LTD, No.\n 12-CV-213 (MOC) (DCK) (W.D.N.C.). In In re Tahoe Resources, Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 17-cv-\n 01868-RFB-NJK (D. Nev.), Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP served as sole lead counsel for the class, defeated\n defendants\u2019 motion to dismiss and subsequently obtained final approval of a $19.5 million settlement for\n the class. In In Re Peloton Interactive, Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 1:21-cv-02369-CBA-PK (E.D.N.Y.),\n\n\n NEW YORK CALIFORNIA PENNSYLVANIA GEORGIA\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-1 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 3 of 30\n\n\n\n\n Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP served as sole lead counsel for the class and obtained final approval of a $13.95\n million settlement for the class. In In re Avalanche Biotechnologies Sec. Litig., No. 3:15-cv-03185-JD\n (N.D. Cal.), Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP served as sole lead counsel for the class in the federal court action,\n and, together with counsel in the parallel state court action, secured final approval of a $13 million global\n settlement of both actions on January 19, 2018. In Larkin v. GoPro, Inc., No. 4:16-CV-06654-CW (N.D.\n Cal.), the court denied defendants\u2019 motion to dismiss, and on September 20, 2019, Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP,\n as sole lead counsel, secured final approval of a $6.75 million settlement for the class. In Rihn v. Acadia\n Pharmaceuticals, Inc., No. 3:15-cv-00575-BTM-DHB (S.D. Cal.), the court denied defendants\u2019 first motion\n to dismiss, and on January 8, 2018, Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, as sole lead counsel for the class, secured\n final approval of a $2.95 million settlement for the class, which represented approximately 36% of the\n total recognized losses claimed by the class. In In re Geron Corp., Sec. Litig., No. 14-CV-1424 (CRB)\n (N.D. Cal.), Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, as sole lead counsel for the class, defeated defendants\u2019 motion to\n dismiss and, on July 21, 2017, obtained final approval of a settlement awarding $6.25 million to the class.\n Also, in In re Dynavax Techs. Corp. Sec. Litig., No. 13-CV-2796 (CRB) (N.D. Cal.), Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP,\n as sole lead counsel for the class, defeated defendants\u2019 motion to dismiss, and on February 6, 2017,\n secured final approval of a $4.5 million settlement on behalf of the class. In In re L&L Energy, Inc. Sec.\n Litig., No. 13-cv-6704 (RA) (S.D.N.Y.), Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, as co-lead counsel, obtained final approval\n on July 31, 2015 of a $3.5 million settlement for the class. In In re Ebix, Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 11-\n cv-2400 (RWS) (N.D. Ga.), the court denied defendants\u2019 motion to dismiss and Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, as\n sole lead counsel, obtained final approval on June 13, 2014 of a $6.5 million settlement for the class. In\n Shapiro v. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc., No. CV-09-1479 (PHX) (ROS) (D. Ariz.), Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, as co-\n lead counsel for the class, defeated defendants\u2019 motion to dismiss, succeeded in having the action\n certified as a class action, and secured final approval of a $4.5 million settlement for the class. See also\n Lowthorp v. Mesa Air Group, Inc., et al., No. 2:20-cv-00648-MTL (D. Ariz.) (as sole lead counsel, obtained\n final approval of a $5 million settlement on behalf of the class); In re Longwei Petroleum Inv. Holding Ltd.\n Sec. Litig., No. 13 Civ. 214 (HB) (S.D.N.Y.) (as sole lead counsel, obtained final approval of a $1.34\n million settlement on behalf of the class); Simmons v. Spencer, et al., No. 13 Civ. 8216 (RWS) (S.D.N.Y.)\n (as co-lead counsel obtained final approval of settlement awarding $1.5 million to the class); In re:\n Revolution Lighting Technologies, Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 1:19-cv-00980-JPO (S.D.N.Y.) (where, as\n sole lead counsel, the firm obtained final approval of $2,083,333.33 settlement); Sterrett v. Sonim Techs.,\n Inc., No. 3:19-cv-06416-MMC (N.D. Cal.) (where, as sole lead counsel, the firm obtained final approval of\n $2 million settlement); Rudani v. Ideanomics, Inc., No. 1:19-cv-06741-GBD (S.D.N.Y.) (where, as sole\n 2\n\n\n NEW YORK CALIFORNIA PENNSYLVANIA GEORGIA\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-1 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 4 of 30\n\n\n\n\n lead counsel, the firm obtained final approval of $5 million settlement); In re CV Scis., Inc. Sec. Litig., No.\n 2:18-cv-01602-JAD-BNM (D. Nev.) (where. as sole lead counsel, the firm obtained final approval of\n $712,500 settlement).\n Additionally, Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP is serving as court-appointed lead counsel in the following cases:\n \u25aa Halman Aldubi Provident and Pension Funds Ltd. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd., No. 20-\n 4660-KSM (E.D. Pa.) (appointed as sole lead counsel for the class);\n \u25aa In re Revance Therapeutics, Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 3:21-cv-09585-AMO (N.D. Cal.) (appointed\n as sole lead counsel for the class);\n \u25aa In re: Lumen Technologies, Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 3:12-cv-00286-TAD-KDM (W.D. La.)\n (appointed as co-lead counsel for the class);\n \u25aa Wang v. Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc., No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-MEH (D. Colo.) (appointed as sole lead\n counsel for the class);\n \u25aa Alms v. Luminar Technologies, Inc., No. 6:23-cv-982-JSS-LHP (M.D. Fla.) (appointed as sole lead\n counsel for the class);\n \u25aa Lim v. Hightower, No. 4:23-cv-01454-BYP (N.D. Ohio) (appointed sole lead counsel for the class);\n \u25aa Clifton v. Willis, No. 1:22-cv-03161-DDD-JPO (D. Colo.) (appointed sole lead counsel for the class);\n \u25aa In re FutureFuel Corp., Securities Litigation, No. 4:24-cv-00881-MTS (E.D. Mo.) (appointed sole lead\n counsel for the class);\n \u25aa Labelle v. Future FinTech Group, Inc., No. 24-247 (JXN) (JSA) (D.N.J.) (appointed sole lead counsel\n for the class); and\n \u25aa Wayne v. Maxeon Solar Techs., Ltd., No. 24-cv-03869-EMC (N.D. Cal.) (appointed sole lead counsel\n for the class).\n\n SHAREHOLDER MERGER AND TRANSACTIONAL LITIGATION\n Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP is nationally recognized for its excellence in prosecuting shareholder class\n actions brought nationwide against officers, directors and other parties responsible for corporate\n wrongdoing. Most of these cases are based upon state statutory or common law principles involving\n fiduciary duties owed to investors by corporate insiders as well as Exchange Act violations.\n Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP has obtained significant monetary and therapeutic recoveries, including\n millions of dollars in increased merger consideration for public shareholders; additional disclosure of\n significant material information so that shareholders can intelligently gauge the fairness of the terms of\n proposed transactions and other types of therapeutic relief designed to increase competitive bids and\n protect shareholder value. As noted by Judge Timothy S. Black of the United States District Court for the\n Southern District of Ohio in appointing lead counsel Nichting v. DPL Inc., Case No. 3:11-cv-141 (S.D. Ohio),\n \"[a]lthough all of the firms seeking appointment as Lead Counsel have impressive resumes, the Court is\n most impressed with Faruqi & Faruqi.\u201d\n\n\n\n 3\n\n\n NEW YORK CALIFORNIA PENNSYLVANIA GEORGIA\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-1 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 5 of 30\n\n\n\n\n For example, in Hall v. Berry Petroleum Co., No. 8476-VCG (Del. Ch.), Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP as\n sole lead counsel was credited by the Delaware Chancery Court with contributing to an increase in\n exchange ratio in an all-stock transaction that provided Berry Petroleum Co. stockholders with an additional\n $600 million in consideration for their shares as well as the disclosure of additional material information\n regarding the transaction. The court noted at the settlement hearing \u201c[t]he ability of petitioning counsel\n [Faruqi] is known to the Court, and plaintiff's counsel [Faruqi] are well versed in the prosecution of corporate\n law actions.\u201d Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP achieved a similar result in In Re Energysolutions, Inc. Shareholder\n Litigation, Cons. C.A. No. 8203-VCG (Del. Ch.), in which the Faruqi Firm, as co-lead counsel, was credited\n in part with an increase in the merger consideration from $3.75 to $4.15 in cash per Energysolution share\n by the acquirer Energy Capital, and credited with additional material disclosures distributed to stockholders.\n In approving the settlement of the case and noting that the price increase amounted to an extra $36 million\n for stockholders, the Delaware Court stated that the standing and ability of the stockholders\u2019 counsel,\n including Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP and its co-counsel, is \u201c\u2026among the highest in our bar.\u201d See In Re\n Energysolutions, Inc. S\u2019holder Litig., Cons. C.A. No. 8203-VCG (Del. Ch. Feb. 11, 2014). In In Re Jefferies\n Group, Inc. Shareholders Litigation, C.A. No. 8059-CB (Del. Ch.), Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP acted as co-lead\n counsel representing Jeffries Group, Inc. stockholders in challenging the transaction with Leucadia National\n Corporation. After years of vigorous litigation, the parties reached a settlement that recovered $70 million\n additional consideration for the former Jeffries Group Inc. stockholders.\n In In re Playboy Enterprises, Inc. Shareholders Litigation, Consol. C.A. No. 5632-VCN (Del. Ch.),\n Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP achieved a substantial post close settlement of $5.25 million. In In re Cogent, Inc.\n Shareholders Litigation, Consol. C.A. No. 5780-VC (Del. Ch.) Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, as co-lead counsel,\n obtained a post-close cash settlement of $1.9 million after two years of hotly contested litigation; In Rice v.\n Lafarge North America, Inc., et al., No. 268974-V (Montgomery Cty., Md. Circuit Ct.), Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP,\n as co-lead counsel represented the public shareholders of Lafarge North America (\u201cLNA\u201d) in challenging\n the buyout of LNA by its French parent, Lafarge S.A., at $75.00 per share. After discovery and intensive\n injunction motions practice, the price per share was increased from $75.00 to $85.50 per share, or a total\n benefit to the public shareholders of $388 million. The Lafarge court gave Class counsel, including Faruqi\n & Faruqi, LLP, shared credit with a special committee appointed by the company\u2019s board of directors for a\n significant portion of the price increase.\n Similarly, in In re: Hearst-Argyle Shareholder Litig., Lead Case No. 09-Civ-600926 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.)\n as co-lead counsel for plaintiffs, Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP litigated, in coordination with Hearst-Argyle\u2019s special\n committee, an increase of over 12.5%, or $8,740,648, from the initial transaction value offered for Hearst-\n 4\n\n\n NEW YORK CALIFORNIA PENNSYLVANIA GEORGIA\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-1 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 6 of 30\n\n\n\n\n Argyle Television Inc.\u2019s stock by its parent company, Hearst Corporation. Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, in In re\n Alfa Corp. Shareholder Litig., Case No. 03-CV-2007-900485.00 (Montgomery Cty, Ala. Cir. Ct.) was\n instrumental, along with the Company\u2019s special committee, in securing an increased share price for Alfa\n Corporation shareholders of $22.00 from the originally-proposed $17.60 per share offer, which represented\n over a $160 million benefit to class members, and obtained additional proxy disclosures to ensure that Alfa\n shareholders were fully-informed before making their decision to vote in favor of the merger, or seek\n appraisal.\n Moreover, in In re Fox Entertainment Group, Inc. S'holders Litig., Consolidated C.A. No. 1033-N\n (Del. Ch. 2005), Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a member of the three (3) firm executive committee, and in\n coordination with Fox Entertainment Group\u2019s special committee, created an increased offer price from the\n original proposal to shareholders, which represented an increased benefit to Fox Entertainment Group, Inc.\n shareholders of $450 million. Also, in In re Howmet Int\u2019l S\u2019holder Litig., Consolidated C.A. No. 17575 (Del.\n Ch. 1999) Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, in coordination with Howmet\u2019s special committee, successfully obtained\n an increased benefit to class members of $61.5 million dollars).\n Recently, in In re Orchard Enterprises, Inc. Stockholder Litigation, C.A. No. 7840-VCL (Del. Ch.),\n Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP acted as co-lead counsel with two other firms. That action involved the approval of a\n merger by Orchard\u2019s Board of Directors pursuant to which Dimensional Associates LLC would cash-out the\n stock of Orchard\u2019s minority common stockholders at a price of $2.05 per share and then take Orchard\n private. On April 11, 2014, the parties reached an agreement to settle their claims for a payment of $10.725\n million to be distributed among the Class, which considerably exceeded the $2.62 per share difference\n between the $2.05 buyout price and the $4.67 appraisal price determined in In re Appraisal of The Orchard\n Enterprises, Inc., C.A. No. 5713-CS, 2012 WL 2923305 (Del. Ch. July 18, 2012).\n Faruqi also has noteworthy successes in achieving injunctive or declaratory relief pre and post\n close in cases where corporate wrongdoing deprives shareholders of material information or an opportunity\n to share in potential profits. In In re Harleysville Group, Inc. S\u2019holders Litigation, C.A. Bo. 6907-VCP (Del.\n Ch. 2014), Faruqi as sole lead counsel obtained significant disclosures for stockholders pre-close and\n secured valuable relief post close in the form of an Anti-Flip Provision providing former stockholders with\n 25% of any profits in Qualifying Sale. In April 2012, Faruqi as sole lead obtained an unprecedented\n injunction in Knee v. Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., No. 1-12-CV-220249, slip op. at 2 (Cal.\n Super. Ct. Apr. 10, 2012) (Kleinberg, J.). In Brocade, Faruqi, as sole lead counsel for plaintiffs, successfully\n obtained an injunction enjoining Brocade\u2019s 2012 shareholder vote because certain information relating to\n projected executive compensation was not properly disclosed in the proxy statement. (Order After Hearing\n 5\n\n\n NEW YORK CALIFORNIA PENNSYLVANIA GEORGIA\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-1 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 7 of 30\n\n\n\n\n [Plaintiff\u2019s Motion for Preliminary Injunction; Motions to Seal]). In Kajaria v. Cohen, No. 1:10-CV-03141\n (N.D. Ga., Atlanta Div.), Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, succeeded in having the district court order Bluelinx Holdings\n Inc., the target company in a tender offer, to issue additional material disclosures to its recommendation\n statement to shareholders before the expiration of the tender offer.\n\n SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION\n Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP has extensive experience litigating shareholder derivative actions on behalf\n of corporate entities. This litigation is often necessary when the corporation has been injured by the\n wrongdoing of its officers and directors. This wrongdoing can be either active, such as the wrongdoing by\n certain corporate officers in connection with purposeful backdating of stock-options, or passive, such as the\n failure to put in place proper internal controls, which leads to the violation of laws and accounting\n procedures. A shareholder has the right to commence a derivative action when the company\u2019s directors\n are unwilling or unable, to pursue claims against the wrongdoers, which is often the case when the directors\n themselves are the wrongdoers.\n The purpose of the derivative action is threefold: (1) to make the company whole by holding those\n responsible for the wrongdoing accountable; (2) the establishment of procedures at the company to ensure\n the damaging acts can never again occur at the company; and (3) make the company more responsive to\n its shareholders. Improved corporate governance and shareholder responsiveness are particularly\n valuable because they make the company a stronger one going forward, which benefits its shareholders.\n For example, studies have shown the companies with poor corporate governance scores have 5-year\n returns that are 3.95% below the industry average, while companies with good corporate governance\n scores have 5-year returns that are 7.91 % above the industry-adjusted average. The difference in\n performance between these two groups is 11.86%. Corporate Governance Study: The Correlation between\n Corporate Governance and Company Performance, Lawrence D. Brown, Ph.D., Distinguished Professor\n of Accountancy, Georgia State University and Marcus L. Caylor, Ph.D. Student, Georgia State University.\n Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP has achieved all three of the above stated goals of a derivative action. The firm\n regularly obtains significant corporate governance changes in connection with the successful resolution of\n derivative actions, in addition to monetary recoveries that inure directly to the benefit of the company. In\n each case, the company\u2019s shareholders indirectly benefit through an improved market price and market\n perception.\n In In re UnitedHealth Group Incorporated Derivative Litig., Case No. 27 CV 06-8065 (Minn. 4th\n Judicial Dist. 2009) Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, as co-lead counsel for plaintiffs, obtained a recovery of more than\n 6\n\n\n NEW YORK CALIFORNIA PENNSYLVANIA GEORGIA\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-1 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 8 of 30\n\n\n\n\n $930 million for the benefit of the Company and corporate governance reforms designed to make\n UnitedHealth a model of corporate responsibility and transparency. At the time, the settlement reached\n was believed to be the largest settlement ever in a derivative case. See \"UnitedHealth's Former Chief\n to Repay $600 Million,\" Bloomberg.com, December 6, 2007 (\"the settlement . . . would be the largest ever\n in a 'derivative' suit . . . according to data compiled by Bloomberg.\").\n As co-lead counsel in Weissman v. John, et al., Cause No. 2007-31254 (Tex. Harris County 2008)\n Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, diligently litigated a shareholder derivative action on behalf of Key Energy Services,\n Inc. for more than three years and caused the company to adopt a multitude of corporate governance\n reforms which far exceeded listing and regulatory requirements. Such reforms included, among other\n things, the appointment of a new senior management team, the realignment of personnel, the institution of\n training sessions on internal control processes and activities, and the addition of 14 new accountants at the\n company with experience in public accounting, financial reporting, tax accounting, and SOX compliance.\n More recently, Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP concluded shareholder derivative litigation in The Booth Family\n Trust, et al. v. Jeffries, et al., Lead Case No. 05-cv-00860 (S.D. Ohio 2005) on behalf of Abercrombie &\n Fitch Co. Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, as co-lead counsel for plaintiffs, litigated the case for six years through an\n appeal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit where it successfully obtained reversal of the district\n court\u2019s ruling dismissing the shareholder derivative action in April 2011. Once remanded to the district\n court, Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP caused the company to adopt important corporate governance reforms narrowly\n targeted to remedy the alleged insider trading and discriminatory employment practices that gave rise to\n the shareholder derivative action.\n The favorable outcome obtained by Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP in In re Forest Laboratories, Inc.\n Derivative Litigation, Lead Civil Action No. 05-cv-3489 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) is another notable achievement for\n the firm. After more than six years of litigation, Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, as co-lead counsel, caused the\n company to adopt industry-leading corporate governance measures that included rigorous monitoring\n mechanisms and Board-level oversight procedures to ensure the timely and complete publication of clinical\n drug trial results to the investing public and to deter, among other things, the unlawful off-label promotion\n of drugs.\n\n ANTITRUST LITIGATION\n The attorneys at Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP represent direct purchasers, competitors, third-party payors,\n and consumers in a variety of individual and class action antitrust cases brought under Sections 1 and 2 of\n the Sherman Act. These actions, which typically seek treble damages under Section 4 of the Clayton Act,\n 7\n\n\n NEW YORK CALIFORNIA PENNSYLVANIA GEORGIA\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-1 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 9 of 30\n\n\n\n\n have been commenced by businesses and consumers injured by anticompetitive agreements to fix prices\n or allocate markets, conduct that excludes or delays competition, and other monopolistic or conspiratorial\n conduct that harms competition.\n Actions for excluded competitors. Faruqi & Faruqi represents competitors harmed by\n anticompetitive practices that reduce their sales, profits, and/or market share. One representative action is\n Babyage.com, Inc., et al. v. Toys \"R\" Us, Inc., et al. where Faruqi & Faruqi was retained to represent three\n internet retailers of baby products, who challenged a dominant retailer's anticompetitive scheme, in concert\n with their upstream suppliers, to impose and enforce resale price maintenance in violation of \u00a7\u00a7 1 and 2 of\n the Sherman Act and state law. The action sought damages measured as lost sales and profits. This case\n was followed extensively by the Wall Street Journal. After several years of litigation, this action settled for\n an undisclosed amount.\n Actions for direct purchasers. Faruqi & Faruqi represents direct purchasers who have paid\n overcharges as a result of anticompetitive practices that raise prices. These actions are typically initiated\n as class actions. A representative action on behalf of direct purchasers is Rochester Drug Co-Operative,\n Inc. v. Warner Chilcott Public Limited Company, et al., No. 12-3824 (E.D. Pa.), in which Faruqi & Faruqi\n was appointed co-lead counsel for the proposed plaintiff class under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(g).\n Faruqi & Faruqi\u2019s attorneys are counsel to direct purchasers (typically wholesalers) in multiple such class\n actions.\n Actions for third-party payors. Faruqi & Faruqi represents, both in class actions and in individual\n actions, insurance companies who have reimbursed their policyholders at too high a rate due to\n anticompetitive prices that raise prices. One representative action is In re Tricor Antitrust Litigation, No.\n 05-360 (D. Del.), where Faruqi & Faruqi represented PacifiCare and other large third-party payors\n challenging the conduct of Abbott Laboratories and Laboratories Fournier in suppressing generic drug\n competition, in violation of \u00a7\u00a7 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act. The Tricor litigation settled for undisclosed\n amount in 2010.\n Results. Faruqi & Faruqi\u2019s attorneys have consistently obtained favorable results in their antitrust\n engagements. Non-confidential results include the following: In re Skelaxin (Metaxalone) Antitrust Litig.,\n No. 12-md-2343, (E.D. Tenn.) ($73 million settlement); In re Wellbutrin XL Antitrust Litig., No. 08-2431 (E.D.\n Pa.) ($37.5 million partial settlement); In re Iowa Ready-Mixed Concrete Antitrust Litigation, No. C 10-4038\n (N.D. Iowa) ($18.5 million settlement); In re Metoprolol Succinate Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation, 06-\n 52 (D. Del.) ($20 million settlement); In re Ready-Mixed Concrete Antitrust Litigation, No. 05-979 (S.D. Ind.)\n\n\n 8\n\n\n NEW YORK CALIFORNIA PENNSYLVANIA GEORGIA\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-1 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 10 of 30\n\n\n\n\n ($40 million settlement); Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc., et al. v. Braintree Labs, Inc., No. 07-142-SLR\n (D. Del.) ($17.25 million settlement).\n A more complete list of Faruqi & Faruqi's active and resolved antitrust cases can be found on its\n web site at www.faruqilaw.com.\n\n CONSUMER PROTECTION LITIGATION\n Attorneys at Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP have advocated for consumers\u2019 rights, successfully challenging\n some of the nation\u2019s largest and most powerful corporations for a variety of improper, unfair and deceptive\n business practices. Through our efforts, we have recovered hundreds of millions of dollars and other\n significant remedial benefits for our consumer clients.\n For example, in Bates v. Kashi Co., et al., Case No. 11-CV-1967-H BGS (S.D. Cal. 2011), as co-\n lead counsel for the class, Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP secured a $5.0 million settlement fund on behalf of\n California consumers who purchased Kashi products that were deceptively labeled as \u201cnothing artificial\u201d\n and \u201call natural.\u201d The settlement provides class members with a full refund of the purchase price in addition\n to requiring Kashi to modify its labeling and advertising to remove \u201cAll Natural\u201d and \u201cNothing Artificial\u201d from\n certain products. As noted by Judge Marilyn L. Huff in approving the settlement, \u201cPlaintiffs\u2019 counsel has\n extensive experience acting as class counsel in consumer class action cases, including cases involving\n false advertising claims.\u201d Moreover, in Thomas v. Global Vision Products, Case No. RG-03091195\n (California Superior Ct., Alameda Cty.), Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP served as co-lead counsel in a consumer\n class action lawsuit against Global Vision Products, Inc., the manufacturer of the Avacor hair restoration\n product and its officers, directors and spokespersons, in connection with the false and misleading\n advertising claims regarding the Avacor product. Though the company had declared bankruptcy in 2007,\n Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, along with its co-counsel, successfully prosecuted two trials to obtain relief for the\n class of Avacor purchasers. In January 2008, a jury in the first trial returned a verdict of almost $37 million\n against two of the creators of the product. In November 2009, another jury awarded plaintiff and the class\n more than $50 million in a separate trial against two other company directors and officers. This jury award\n represented the largest consumer class action jury award in California in 2009 (according to VerdictSearch,\n a legal trade publication).\n Additionally, in Rodriguez v. CitiMortgage, Inc., Case No. 11-cv-04718-PGG-DCF (S.D.N.Y. 2011),\n Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, as co-lead class counsel, reached a significant settlement with CitiMortgage related\n to improper foreclosure practices of homes owned by active duty servicemembers. The settlement was\n recently finalized pursuant to a Final Approval Order dated October 6, 2015, which provides class members\n 9\n\n\n NEW YORK CALIFORNIA PENNSYLVANIA GEORGIA\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-1 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 11 of 30\n\n\n\n\n with a monetary recovery of at least $116,785.00 per class member, plus the amount of any lost equity in\n the foreclosed property.\n Below is a non-exhaustive list of settlements where Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP and its partners have\n served as lead or co-lead counsel:\n \u25aa In re Sinus Buster Products Consumer Litig., Case No. 1:12-cv-02429-ADS-AKT (E.D.N.Y. 2012). The\n firm represented a nationwide class of purchasers of assorted cold, flu and sinus products. A settlement\n was obtained, providing class members with a cash refund up to $10 and requiring defendant to\n discontinue the marketing and sale of certain products.\n \u25aa In re: Alexia Foods, Inc. Litigation., Case No. 4:11-cv-06119 (N.D. Cal. 2011). The firm represented a\n proposed class of all persons who purchased certain frozen potato products that were deceptively\n advertised as \u201cnatural\u201d or \u201call natural.\u201d A settlement was obtained, providing class members with the\n cash refunds up to $35.00 and requiring defendant to cease using a synthetic chemical compound in\n future production of the products.\n \u25aa In re: Haier Freezer Consumer Litig., Case No. 5:11-CV-02911-EJD (N.D. Cal. 2011). The firm\n represented a nationwide class of consumers who purchased certain model freezers, which were sold\n in violation of the federal standard for maximum energy consumption. A settlement was obtained,\n providing class members with cash payments of between $50 and $325.80.\n \u25aa Loreto v. Coast Cutlery Co., Case No. 11-3977 SDW-MCA (D.N.J. 2011) The firm represented a\n proposed nationwide class of people who purchased stainless steel knives and multi-tools that were of\n a lesser quality than advertised. A settlement was obtained, providing class members with a full refund\n of the purchase price.\n \u25aa Rossi v Procter & Gamble Company., Case No. 11-7238 (D.N.J. 2011). The firm represented a\n nationwide class of consumers who purchased deceptively marketed \u201cCrest Sensitivity\u201d toothpaste. A\n settlement was obtained, providing class members with a full refund of the purchase price.\n \u25aa In re: Michaels Stores Pin Pad Litig., Case No. 1:11-CV-03350 CPK (N.D. Ill. 2011). The firm\n represented a nationwide class of persons against Michaels Stores, Inc. for failing to secure and\n safeguard customers\u2019 personal financial data. A settlement was obtained, which provided class\n members with monetary recovery for unreimbursed out-of-pocket losses incurred in connection with\n the data breach, as well as up to four years of credit monitoring services.\n \u25aa Kelly, v. Phiten, Case No. 4:11-cv-00067 JEG (S.D. Iowa 2011). The firm represented a proposed\n nationwide class of consumers who purchased Defendant Phiten USA\u2019s jewelry and other products,\n which were falsely promoted to balance a user\u2019s energy flow. A settlement was obtained, providing\n class members with up to 300% of the cost of the product and substantial injunctive relief requiring\n Phiten to modify its advertising claims.\n \u25aa In re: HP Power-Plug Litigation, Case No. 06-1221 (N.D. Cal. 2006). The firm represented a proposed\n nationwide class of consumers who purchased defective laptops manufactured by defendant. A\n settlement was obtained, which provided full relief to class members, including among other benefits a\n cash payment up to $650.00 per class member, or in the alternative, a repair free-of-charge and new\n limited warranties accompanying repaired laptops.\n \u25aa Delre v. Hewlett-Packard Co., C.A. No. 3232-02 (N.J. Super. Ct. 2002). The firm represented a\n proposed nationwide class of consumers (approximately 170,000 members) who purchased, HP dvd-\n 100i dvd-writers (\u201cHP 100i\u201d) based on misrepresentations regarding the write-once (\u201cDVD+R\u201d)\n capabilities of the HP 100i and the compatibility of DVD+RW disks written by HP 100i with DVD players\n and other optical storage devices. A settlement was obtained, which provided full relief to class\n members, including among other benefits, the replacement of defective HP 100i with its more current,\n\n 10\n\n\n NEW YORK CALIFORNIA PENNSYLVANIA GEORGIA\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-1 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 12 of 30\n\n\n\n\n second generation DVD writer, the HP 200i, and/or refunds the $99 it had charged some consumers to\n upgrade from the HP 100i to the HP 200i prior to the settlement.\n\n In addition, Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP and its partners are currently serving as lead or co-lead counsel\n in the following class action cases:\n \u25aa Dei Rossi et al. v. Whirlpool Corp., Case No. 2:12-cv-00125-TLN-JFM (E.D. Cal. 2012) (representing\n a certified class of people who purchased mislabeled KitchenAid brand refrigerators from Whirlpool\n Corp.)\n \u25aa In re: Scotts EZ Seed Litigation, Case No. 7:12-cv-04727-VB (S.D.N.Y. 2012) (representing a certified\n class of purchasers of mulch grass seed products advertised as a superior grass seed product capable\n of growing grass in the toughest conditions and with half the water.)\n \u25aa Forcellati et al., v Hyland\u2019s, Inc. et al., Case No. 2:12-cv-01983-GHK-MRW (C.D. Cal. 2012)\n (representing a certified nationwide class of purchasers of children\u2019s cold and flu products.)\n \u25aa Avram v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., et al., Case No. 2:11-cv-06973 KM-MCA (D.N.J. 2011)\n (representing a proposed nationwide class of persons who purchased mislabeled refrigerators from\n Samsung Electronics America, Inc. for misrepresenting the energy efficiency of certain refrigerators.)\n \u25aa Dzielak v. Whirlpool Corp., et al., Case No. 12-CIV-0089 SRC-MAS (D.N.J. 2011) (representing a\n proposed nationwide class of purchasers of mislabeled Maytag brand washing machines for\n misrepresenting the energy efficiency of such washing machines.)\n \u25aa In re: Shop-Vac Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation, Case No. 4:12-md-02380-YK (M.D. Pa. 2012)\n (representing a proposed nationwide class of persons who purchased vacuums or Shop Vac\u2019s with\n overstated horsepower and tank capacity specifications.)\n \u25aa In re: Oreck Corporation Halo Vacuum And Air Purifiers Marketing And Sales Practices Litigation, MDL\n No. 2317 (the firm was appointed to the executive committee, representing a proposed nationwide\n class of consumers who purchased vacuums and air purifiers that were deceptively advertised effective\n in eliminating common viruses, germs and allergens.)\n\n EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LITIGATION\n Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP is a recognized leader in protecting the rights of employees. The firm\u2019s\n Employment Practices Group is committed to protecting the rights of current and former employees\n nationwide. The firm is dedicated to representing employees who may not have been compensated\n properly by their employer or who have suffered investment losses in their employer-sponsored retirement\n plan. The firm also represents individuals (often current or former employees) who assert that a company\n has allegedly defrauded the federal or state government.\n Faruqi & Faruqi represents current and former employees nationwide whose employers have failed\n to comply with state and/or federal laws governing minimum wage, hours worked, overtime, meal and rest\n breaks, and unreimbursed business expenses. In particular, the firm focuses on claims against companies\n for (i) failing to properly classify their employees for purposes of paying them proper overtime pay, or (ii)\n requiring employees to work \u201coff-the-clock,\u201d and not paying them for all of their actual hours worked.\n\n 11\n\n\n NEW YORK CALIFORNIA PENNSYLVANIA GEORGIA\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-1 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 13 of 30\n\n\n\n\n In prosecuting claims on behalf of aggrieved employees, Faruqi & Faruqi has successfully defeated\n summary judgment motions, won numerous collective certification motions, and obtained significant\n monetary recoveries for current and former employees. In the course of litigating these claims, the firm has\n been a pioneer in developing the growing area of wage and hour law. In Creely, et al. v. HCR ManorCare,\n Inc., C.A. No. 3:09-cv-02879 (N.D. OH), Faruqi & Faruqi, along with its co-counsel, obtained one of the first\n decisions to reject the application of the Supreme Court\u2019s Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 certification analysis in Wal-\n Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes et. al., 131 S. Ct. 2541 (2011) to the certification process of collective actions\n brought pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (\u201cFLSA\u201d). The firm, along with its co-counsel,\n also recently won a groundbreaking decision for employees seeking to prosecute wage and hour claims on\n a collective basis in Symczyk v. Genesis Healthcare Corp. et al., No. 10-3178 (3d Cir. 2011). In Symczyk,\n the Third Circuit reversed the district court\u2019s ruling that an offer of judgment mooted a named plaintiff\u2019s claim\n in an action asserting wage and hour violations of the FLSA. Notably, the Third Circuit also affirmed the\n two-step process used for granting certification in FLSA cases. The Creely decision, like the Third Circuit\u2019s\n Genesis decision, will invariably be relied upon by courts and plaintiffs in future wage and hour actions.\n Some of the firm\u2019s notable recoveries include Bazzini v. Club Fit Management, Inc., C.A. No. 08-\n cv-4530 (S.D.N.Y. 2008), wherein the firm settled a FLSA collective action lawsuit on behalf of tennis\n professionals, fitness instructors and other health club employees on very favorable terms. Similarly, in\n Garcia, et al., v. Lowe's Home Center, Inc., et al., C.A. No. GIC 841120 (Cal. Sup. Ct. 2008), Faruqi &\n Faruqi served as co-lead counsel and recovered $1.6 million on behalf of delivery workers who were\n unlawfully treated as independent contractors and not paid appropriate overtime wages or benefits.\n The firm\u2019s Employment Practices Group also represents participants and beneficiaries of employee\n benefit plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1874 (\u201cERISA\u201d). In particular\n the firm protects the interests of employees in retirement savings plans against the wrongful conduct of\n plan fiduciaries. Often, these retirement savings plans constitute a significant portion of an employee\u2019s\n retirement savings. ERISA, which codifies one of the highest duties known to law, requires an employer to\n act in the best interests of the plan\u2019s participants, including the selection and maintenance of retirement\n investment vehicles. For example, an employer who administers a retirement savings plan (often a 401(k)\n plan) has a fiduciary obligation to ensure that the retirement plan\u2019s assets (including employee and any\n company matching contributions to the plan) are directed into appropriate and prudent investment vehicles.\n Faruqi & Faruqi has brought actions on behalf of aggrieved plan participants where a company\n and/or certain of its officers breached their fiduciary duty by allowing its retirement plans to invest in shares\n of its own stock despite having access to materially negative information concerning the company which\n 12\n\n\n NEW YORK CALIFORNIA PENNSYLVANIA GEORGIA\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-1 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 14 of 30\n\n\n\n\n materially impacted the value of the stock. The resulting losses can be devastating to employees\u2019\n retirement accounts. Under certain circumstances, current and former employees can seek to hold their\n employers accountable for plan losses caused by the employer\u2019s breach of their ERISA-mandated duties.\n The firm\u2019s Employment Practices Group also represents whistleblowers in actions under both\n federal and state False Claims Acts. Often, current and former employees of business entities that contract\n with, or are otherwise bound by obligations to, the federal and state governments become aware of\n wrongdoing that causes the government to overpay for a good or service. When a corporation perpetrates\n such fraud, a whistleblower may sue the wrongdoer in the government\u2019s name to recover up to three times\n actual damages and additional civil penalties for each false statement made. Whistleblowers who initiate\n such suits are entitled to a portion of the recovery attained by the government, generally ranging from 15%\n to 30% of the total recovery.\n False Claims Act cases often arise in context of Medicare and Medicaid fraud, pharmaceutical\n fraud, defense contractor fraud, federal government contractor fraud, and fraudulent loans and grants. For\n instance, in United States of America, ex rel. Ronald J. Streck v. Allergan, Inc. et al., No. 2:08-cv-05135-\n ER (E.D. Pa.), Faruqi & Faruqi represents a whistleblower in an un-sealed case alleging fraud against\n thirteen pharmaceutical companies who underpaid rebates they were obliged to pay to state Medicaid\n programs on drugs sold through those programs.\n Based on its experience and expertise, the firm has served as the principal attorneys representing\n current and former employees in numerous cases across the country alleging wage and hour violations,\n ERISA violations and violations of federal and state False Claims Acts.\n\n\n ATTORNEYS\n NADEEM FARUQI\n Mr. Faruqi is Co-Founder and a Managing Partner of Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP. Mr. Faruqi oversees\n all aspects of the firm\u2019s practice areas. Mr. Faruqi has acted as sole lead or co-lead counsel in many\n notable class or derivative action cases, such as: In re Olsten Corp. Secs. Litig., C.A. No. 97-CV-5056\n (E.D.N.Y.) (recovered $25 million dollars for class members); In re PurchasePro, Inc., Secs. Litig., Master\n File No. CV-S-01-0483 (D. Nev. 2001) ($24.2 million dollars recovery on behalf of the class in securities\n fraud action); In re Avatex Corp. S\u2019holders Litig., C.A. No. 16334-NC (Del. Ch. 1999) (established certain\n new standards for preferred shareholders rights); Dennis v. Pronet, Inc., C.A. No. 96-06509 (Tex. Dist. Ct.)\n (recovered over $15 million dollars on behalf of shareholders); In re Tellium, Inc. Secs. Litig., C.A. No. 02-\n 13\n\n\n NEW YORK CALIFORNIA PENNSYLVANIA GEORGIA\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-1 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 15 of 30\n\n\n\n\n CV-5878 (D.N.J.) (class action settlement of $5.5 million); In re Tenet Healthcare Corp. Derivative Litig.,\n Lead Case No. 01098905 (Cal. Sup. Ct. 2002) (achieved a $51.5 million benefit to the corporation in\n derivative litigation).\n Upon graduation from law school, Mr. Faruqi was associated with a large corporate legal\n department in New York. In 1988, he became associated with Kaufman Malchman Kirby & Squire,\n specializing in shareholder litigation, and in 1992, became a member of that firm. While at Kaufman\n Malchman Kirby & Squire, Mr. Faruqi served as one of the trial counsel for plaintiff in Gerber v. Computer\n Assocs. Int\u2019l, Inc., 91-CV-3610 (E.D.N.Y. 1991). Mr. Faruqi actively participated in cases such as: Colaprico\n v. Sun Microsystems, No. C-90-20710 (N.D. Cal. 1993) (recovery in excess of $5 million on behalf of the\n shareholder class); In re Jackpot Secs. Enters., Inc. Secs. Litig., CV-S-89-805 (D. Nev. 1993) (recovery in\n excess of $3 million on behalf of the shareholder class); In re Int\u2019l Tech. Corp. Secs. Litig., CV 88-440 (C.D.\n Cal. 1993) (recovery in excess of $13 million on behalf of the shareholder class); and In re Triangle Inds.,\n Inc. S\u2019holders Litig., C.A. No. 10466 (Del. Ch. 1990) (recovery in excess of $70 million).\n Mr. Faruqi earned his Bachelor of Science Degree from McGill University, Canada (B.Sc. 1981),\n his Master of Business Administration from the Schulich School of Business, York University, Canada (MBA\n 1984) and his law degree from New York Law School (J.D., cum laude, 1987). Mr. Faruqi was Executive\n Editor of New York Law School\u2019s Journal of International and Comparative Law. He is the author of \u201cLetters\n of Credit: Doubts As To Their Continued Usefulness,\u201d Journal of International and Comparative Law, 1988.\n He was awarded the Professor Ernst C. Stiefel Award for Excellence in Comparative, Common and Civil\n Law by New York Law School in 1987.\n Mr. Faruqi is licensed to practice law in New York and is admitted to the United States District\n Courts for the Southern, Eastern and Western Districts of New York, and the District of Colorado, and the\n United States Court of Appeals for the Second and Third Circuits.\n\n LUBNA M. FARUQI\n Ms. Faruqi is Co-Founder and a Managing Partner of Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP. Ms. Faruqi is involved\n in all aspects of the firm\u2019s practice. Ms. Faruqi has actively participated in numerous cases in federal and\n state courts which have resulted in significant recoveries for shareholders.\n Ms. Faruqi was involved in litigating the successful recovery of $25 million to class members in In\n re Olsten Corp. Secs. Litig., C.A. No. 97-CV-5056 (E.D.N.Y.). She helped to establish certain new\n standards for preferred shareholders in Delaware in In re Avatex Corp. S\u2019holders Litig., C.A. No. 16334-NC\n (Del. Ch. 1999). Ms. Faruqi was also lead attorney in In re Mitcham Indus., Inc. Secs. Litig., Master File\n 14\n\n\n NEW YORK CALIFORNIA PENNSYLVANIA GEORGIA\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-1 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 16 of 30\n\n\n\n\n No. H-98-1244 (S.D. Tex. 1998), where she successfully recovered $3 million on behalf of class members\n despite the fact that the corporate defendant was on the verge of declaring bankruptcy.\n Upon graduation from law school, Ms. Faruqi worked with the Department of Consumer and\n Corporate Affairs, Bureau of Anti-Trust, the Federal Government of Canada. In 1987, Ms. Faruqi became\n associated with Kaufman Malchman Kirby & Squire, specializing in shareholder litigation, where she\n actively participated in cases such as: In re Triangle Inds., Inc. S\u2019holders Litig., C.A. No. 10466 (Del. Ch.\n 1990) (recovery in excess of $70 million); Kantor v. Zondervan Corp., C.A. No. 88 C5425 (W.D. Mich. 1989)\n (recovery of $3.75 million on behalf of shareholders); and In re A.L. Williams Corp. S\u2019holders Litig., C.A.\n No. 10881 (Del. Ch. 1990) (recovery in excess of $11 million on behalf of shareholders).\n Ms. Faruqi graduated from McGill University Law School at the age of twenty-one with two law\n degrees: Bachelor of Civil Law (B.C.L.) (1980) and a Bachelor of Common Law (L.L.B.) (1981).\n Ms. Faruqi is licensed to practice law in New York and is admitted to the United States District\n Court for the Southern District of New York.\n\n PETER KOHN\n Mr. Kohn is a Partner in Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP\u2019s Pennsylvania office and Co-Chair of the firm\u2019s\n Antitrust Litigation Practice Group.\n Prior to joining the firm, Mr. Kohn was a shareholder at Berger & Montague, P.C., where he\n prepared for trial several noteworthy lawsuits under the Sherman Act, including In re Buspirone Patent &\n Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 1410 (S.D.N.Y.) ($220M settlement), In re Cardizem CD Antitrust Litigation,\n No. 99-MD-1278 (E.D. Mich.) ($110M settlement), Meijer, Inc. v. Warner-Chilcott, No. 05-2195 (D.D.C.)\n ($22M settlement), In re Relafen Antitrust Litigation, No. 01-12239 (D. Mass.) ($175M settlement), In re\n Remeron Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation, No. 03-cv-0085 (D.N.J.) ($75M settlement), In re Terazosin\n Hydrochloride Antitrust Litigation, No. 99-MDL-1317 (S.D. Fla.) ($72.5M settlement), and In re Tricor Direct\n Purchaser Antitrust Litig., No. 05-340 (D. Del.) ($250M settlement). The court appointed him as co-lead\n counsel for the plaintiffs in In re Pennsylvania Title Ins. Antitrust Litig., No. 08cv1202 (E.D. Pa.) (pending\n action on behalf of direct purchasers of title insurance alleging illegal cartel pricing under \u00a7 1 of the Sherman\n Act).\n A sampling of Mr. Kohn\u2019s reported cases in the antitrust arena includes In re Solodyn (Minocycline\n Hydrochloride) Antitrust Litig., Civil Action No. 14-md-02503-DJC, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125999 (D. Mass.\n Aug. 14, 2015) (denying motion to dismiss reverse payment claims under the Sherman Act); King Drug Co.\n of Florence v. Cephalon, Inc., 88 F. Supp. 3d 402 (E.D. Pa. 2015) (reverse payment claims under the\n 15\n\n\n NEW YORK CALIFORNIA PENNSYLVANIA GEORGIA\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-1 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 17 of 30\n\n\n\n\n Sherman Act survived summary judgment); In re Suboxone (Buprenorphine Hydrochloride & Naloxone)\n Antitrust Litig., 64 F. Supp. 3d 665 (E.D. Pa. 2014) (denying motion to dismiss product hopping claims\n under the Sherman Act); In re Lidoderm Antitrust Litig., 74 F. Supp. 3d 1052 (N.D. Cal. 2014) (denying\n motion to dismiss reverse payment claims under the Sherman Act); Mylan Pharms., Inc. v. Warner Chilcott\n Pub., No. 12-3824, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152467 (E.D. Pa. June 11, 2013) (denying motion to dismiss\n product hopping claims under the Sherman Act); In re Hypodermic Prods. Antitrust Litig., 484 Fed. Appx.\n 669 (3d Cir. 2012) (issue of direct purchaser standing under Illinois Brick); Wallach v. Eaton Corp., 814 F.\n Supp. 2d 428 (D. Del. 2011) (application of the Third Circuit\u2019s \u201ccomplete involvement\u201d exception to the in\n pari delicto doctrine); Delaware Valley Surgical Supply Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson, 523 F.3d 1116 (9th Cir.\n 2008) (issue of direct purchaser standing under Illinois Brick); Babyage.com, Inc. v. Toys \u201cR\u201d Us, Inc., 558\n F. Supp.2d 575 (E.D. Pa. 2008) (denying defendants\u2019 motion to dismiss following the Supreme Court\u2019s\n decisions in Twombly and Leegin, and for the first time in the Third Circuit adopting the Merger Guidelines\n method of relevant market definition); J.B.D.L. Corp. v. Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Inc., 485 F.3d 880 (6th\n Cir. 2007) (affirming summary judgment in exclusionary contracting case); and Babyage.com, Inc. v. Toys\n \u201cR\u201d Us, Inc., 458 F. Supp.2d 263 (E.D. Pa. 2006) (discoverability of surreptitiously recorded statements\n prior to deposition of declarant).\n Mr. Kohn is a 1989 graduate of the University of Pennsylvania (B.A., English) and a 1992 cum\n laude graduate of Temple University Law School, where he was senior staff for the Temple Law Review\n and received awards for trial advocacy. Mr. Kohn was recognized as a \u201crecommended\u201d antitrust attorney\n in the Northeast in 2009 by the Legal 500 guide (www.legal500.com) and was chosen by his peers as a\n \u201cSuperLawyer\u201d in Pennsylvania in 2009 - 2013, and 2016. Mr. Kohn was an invited speaker at the ABA\n Section of Antitrust Law\u2019s 2016 Spring Meeting in Washington, D.C., for the Health Care & Pharmaceuticals\n and State Enforcement Committee\u2019s program, \u201cExclusionary or Not? Product Hopping and REMS.\u201d He was\n also invited to speak for the ABA Section of Antitrust Law\u2019s program \"Product Hopping Cases: Where Are\n We and Where Are We Headed\" in December 2015, as well as Harris Martin Publishing\u2019s Antitrust Pay-for-\n Delay Litigation Conference in 2014 and 2015. In 2011, Mr. Kohn was selected as a Fellow in the Litigation\n Counsel of America, a trial lawyer honorary society composed of less than one-half of one percent of\n American lawyers. He is a member of the bars of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (1992-present), the\n United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (1995-present), the United States\n District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (2010-present), the United States Court of Appeals for the\n Third Circuit (2000-present), the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (2005-present), the\n\n\n 16\n\n\n NEW YORK CALIFORNIA PENNSYLVANIA GEORGIA\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-1 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 18 of 30\n\n\n\n\n United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (2016-present), and the United States Court of Appeals\n for the Federal Circuit (2011-present).\n\n JOSEPH T. LUKENS\n Mr. Lukens is a Partner in Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP\u2019s Pennsylvania office and Co-Chair of the firm\u2019s\n Antitrust Litigation Practice Group.\n Mr. Lukens was a shareholder at the Philadelphia firm of Hangley Aronchick Segal Pudlin &\n Schiller, where he represented large retail pharmacy chains as opt-out plaintiffs in numerous lawsuits under\n the Sherman Act. Among those lawsuits were In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litigation\n (MDL 897, N.D. Ill.), In re Terazosin Hydrochloride Antitrust Litigation (MDL 1317, S.D. Fla.), In re TriCor\n Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation (05-605, D. Del.), In re Nifedipine Antitrust Litigation (MDL1515,\n D.D.C.), In re OxyContin Antitrust Litigation (04-3719, S.D.N.Y), and In re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust\n Litigation (MDL 1935, M.D. Pa.). While the results in the opt-out cases are confidential, the parallel class\n actions in those matters which are concluded have resulted in settlements exceeding $1.1 billion.\n Earlier in his career, Mr. Lukens concentrated in commercial and civil rights litigation at the\n Philadelphia firm of Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis. The types of matters that Mr. Lukens handled\n included antitrust, First Amendment, contracts, and licensing. Mr. Lukens also worked extensively on\n several notable pro bono cases including Commonwealth v. Morales, which resulted in a rare reversal on\n a second post-conviction petition in a capital case in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.\n Mr. Lukens graduated from LaSalle University (B.A. Political Science, cum laude, 1987) and\n received his law degree from Temple University School of Law (J.D., magna cum laude, 1992) where he\n was an editor on the Temple Law Review and received several academic awards. After law school, Mr.\n Lukens clerked for the Honorable Joseph J. Longobardi, Chief Judge for the United States District Court\n for the District of Delaware (1992-93). Mr. Lukens is a member of the bars of the Supreme Court of\n Pennsylvania (1992-present), the United States Supreme Court (1996-present); the United States District\n Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (1993-present), the United States Court of Appeals for the\n Third Circuit (1993-present), and the United States Court of Appeals for the District of New Jersey (1994-\n present).\n Mr. Lukens has several publications, including: Bringing Market Discipline to Pharmaceutical\n Product Reformulations, 42 Int'l Rev. Intel. Prop. & Comp. Law 698 (September 2011) (co-author with Steve\n Shadowen and Keith Leffler); Anticompetitive Product Changes in the Pharmaceutical Industry, 41 Rutgers\n L.J. 1 (2009) (co-author with Steve Shadowen and Keith Leffler); The Prison Litigation Reform Act: Three\n 17\n\n\n NEW YORK CALIFORNIA PENNSYLVANIA GEORGIA\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-1 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 19 of 30\n\n\n\n\n Strikes and You\u2019re Out of Court \u2014 It May Be Effective, But Is It Constitutional?, 70 Temp. L. Rev. 471\n (1997); Pennsylvania Strips The Inventory Search Exception From Its Rationale \u2013 Commonwealth v. Nace,\n 64 Temp. L. Rev. 267 (1991).\n\n JAMES M. WILSON, JR.\n James M. Wilson, Jr. is a Partner in Faruqi & Faruqi LLP\u2019s New York office and Co-Chair of the\n firm\u2019s Securities Litigation Practice Group and is a lead attorney on several large securities class actions.\n Prior to joining Faruqi & Faruqi, Mr. Wilson was a partner at Chitwood Harley Harnes, LLP, and a\n senior associate with Reed Smith, LLP. Mr. Wilson has represented institutional pension funds,\n corporations and individual investors in courts around the country and obtained significant recoveries,\n including the following securities class actions: In re ArthroCare Sec. Litig. No. 08-0574 (W.D. Tex.) ($74\n million); In re Maxim Integrated Prod. Sec. Litig., No. 08-0832 (N.D. Cal.) ($173 million); In re TyCom Ltd.\n Sec. Litig., MDL No. 02-1335 (D.N.H.) ($79 million); and In re Providian Fin. Corp. Sec. Litig., No. 01-3952\n (N.D. Cal.). Mr. Wilson also has obtained significant relief for shareholders in merger suits, including the\n following: In re Zoran Corporation Shareholders Litig., No. 6212-VCP (Del. Chancery); and In re The Coca-\n Cola Company Shareholder Litigation, No. 10-182035 (Fulton County Superior Ct.).\n Mr. Wilson has authored numerous articles addressing current developments including the\n following Expert Commentaries published by Lexis Nexis: The Liability Faced By Financial Institutions From\n Exposure To Subprime Mortgages; Losses Attributable To Sub-Prime Mortgages; The Supreme Court's\n Decision in Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. et al.; Derivative Suite by LLC\n Members in New York: Tzolis v. Wolff, 10 N.Y.3d 100 (Feb. 14, 2008).\n Mr. Wilson obtained his undergraduate degree from Georgia State University (B.A. 1988), his law\n degree from the University of Georgia (J.D. 1991), and Masters in Tax Law from New York University (LL.M.\n 1992). He is licensed to practice law in Georgia and New York and is admitted to the United States District\n Courts for Middle and Northern Districts of Georgia, the Eastern and Southern Districts of New York, the\n Eastern District of Michigan and the District of Colorado, and the United States Courts of Appeals for the\n Second, Fifth and Eleventh Circuits.\n\n ROBERT W. KILLORIN\n Robert W. Killorin is a Partner with the firm and is based in the Atlanta Georgia office and is a\n member of the firm\u2019s Institutional Investor Practice Group and Co-Chair of the firm\u2019s Securities Litigation\n Practice Group. His practice is focused on shareholder merger and securities litigation. Mr. Killorin is a\n\n 18\n\n\n NEW YORK CALIFORNIA PENNSYLVANIA GEORGIA\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-1 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 20 of 30\n\n\n\n\n lead attorney on several large securities class actions. Mr. Killorin is an accomplished trial lawyer with over\n twenty years of experience in civil litigation. Prior to joining Faruqi & Faruqi, Mr. Killorin was a partner at\n the firm of Chitwood Harley Harnes, LLP where he specialized in complex securities litigation. Mr. Killorin\n has represented numerous individual plaintiffs, as well as institutional pension funds, corporations and\n individual investors in courts around the country. He has obtained significant recoveries, including the\n following securities class actions: In re FireEye, Inc. Sec. Litig., No. 14-266866 ($10 million settlement\n pending); In re ArthroCare Sec. Litig. No. 08-0574 (W.D. Tex.) ($74 million); In re Maxim Integrated Prod.\n Sec. Litig., No. 08-0832 (N.D. Cal.) ($173 million); In re TyCom Ltd. Sec. Litig., MDL No. 02-1335 (D.N.H.)\n ($79 million); and In re Providian Fin. Corp. Sec. Litig., No. 01-3952 (N.D. Cal.). Mr. Killorin has obtained\n significant relief for shareholders in merger suits, including the following: In re The Coca-Cola Company\n Shareholder Litigation, No. 10-182035 (Fulton County Superior Ct.).\n Mr. Killorin authored \u201cPreparing Clients to Testify\u201d \u2013 Chapter 19 of Civil Trial Practice, Winning\n Techniques of Successful Trial Attorneys, Lawyers and Judges Publishing Company (2000), and has\n written articles and lectured on various legal topics. He is listed in Who\u2019s Who in American Law and is an\n AV\u00ae Preeminent\u2122 Peer Review Rated attorney.\n Mr. Killorin obtained his undergraduate degree from Duke University (B.A., cum laude, 1980) and\n his law degree from the University of Georgia (J.D. 1983) where he was on the national mock trial team\n and a national moot court team. He is licensed to practice law in Georgia and is admitted to the United\n States Supreme Court, the United States Courts of Appeals for the Tenth and Eleventh Circuits, and the\n United States District Courts for Middle and Northern Districts of Georgia.\n\n BRADLEY J. DEMUTH\n Bradley J. Demuth\u2019s practice is focused on complex antitrust litigation with particular expertise in\n cases involving pharmaceutical overcharges resulting from delayed generic entry schemes, price fixing,\n and other anticompetitive conduct. Mr. Demuth is a Partner in the firm\u2019s New York office.\n Upon graduating, cum laude, from American University Washington College of Law (1999), Mr.\n Demuth served as a law clerk to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. While thereafter\n associated with Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP and Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meager & Flom LLP, Mr.\n Demuth successfully represented several national and multinational corporate defendants in a wide range\n of antitrust and other commercial disputes. His antitrust experience includes litigating issues in the\n pharmaceutical, high-tech, professional sports, consumer goods, luxury goods, financial benchmarking,\n commodities, and industrial materials contexts. In 2008, Mr. Demuth received the Pro Bono Service Award\n\n 19\n\n\n NEW YORK CALIFORNIA PENNSYLVANIA GEORGIA\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-1 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 21 of 30\n\n\n\n\n for briefing and arguing an appeal made to the New York Supreme Court Appellate Term (1st Dep\u2019t) on\n behalf of displaced low-income tenants. From 2009-2010, Mr. Demuth served as a Special Assistant\n Corporation Counsel and acting lead trial counsel for the City of New York, where among other favorable\n resolutions, he obtained a verdict for the City after a two-week trial in Richardson v. City of New York (Index.\n No. 14216-99).\n Upon joining the Plaintiffs\u2019 bar in 2012, Mr. Demuth has made notable contributions in several high-\n profile pharmaceutical antitrust cases that resulted in significant recoveries, including in:\n \u2022 American Sales Company, LLC v. Pfizer, Inc. (E.D. Va.) (re Celebrex) (October 2017 $94 million\n dollar settlement pending final approval);\n \u2022 In re Aggrenox Antitrust Litigation (D. Conn.) ($146 million settlement);\n \u2022 Castro v. Sanofi Pasteur, Inc. (D.N.J.) (re Menactra) ($61.5 million settlement); and\n \u2022 In re Flonase Antitrust Litigation (E.D. Pa.) ($150 million settlement).\n Mr. Demuth is also currently involved in several other pending high-profile pharmaceutical antitrust\n matters including: In re Generic Pharmaceutical Pricing Antitrust Litigation (E.D. Pa.); In re Restasis\n (Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion) Antitrust Litigation (E.D.N.Y.); and In re Intuniv Antitrust Litigation (D.\n Mass.).\n Mr. Demuth is a member of the New York State bar and is admitted to practice before the United\n States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and the United States District Courts for the Southern and\n Eastern Districts of New York and the District of Colorado.\n\n TIMOTHY J. PETER\n Timothy J. Peter is a Partner in Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP\u2019s Pennsylvania office and Chair of the firm\u2019s\n Consumer Protection Litigation Practice Group.\n Prior to joining Faruqi & Faruqi, Mr. Peter was an Associate at Cohen Placittella & Roth, P.C. where\n he was involved in such high profile litigation as: In re Vioxx Products Liability Litigation ($8.25 million\n recovery for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania) and In re Evergreen Ultra Short Opportunities Fund\n Securities Litigation ($25 million class action securities settlement in which participating class members will\n recover over 65% of their losses). In addition, Mr. Peter played an important role in the resolution of In re\n Minerva Group LP v. Mod-Pac Corp., et al., in which defendants increased the price of an insider buyout\n from $8.20 to $9.25 per share, a significant victory for shareholders. Prior to attending law school, Mr. Peter\n worked for one of largest financial institutions in the world where he gained significant insight into the inner\n workings of the financial services industry.\n 20\n\n\n NEW YORK CALIFORNIA PENNSYLVANIA GEORGIA\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-1 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 22 of 30\n\n\n\n\n Mr. Peter is a 2009 cum laude graduate of the Michigan State University College of Law, where he\n served as an associate editor of the Journal of Medicine and Law. He received his undergraduate degree\n in Economics from the College of Wooster in 2002.\n Mr. Peter is admitted to practice in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the U.S. District Court\n for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.\n\n ADAM STEINFELD\n Adam Steinfeld is a Partner in Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP\u2019s New York office. He practices in the area of\n antitrust litigation with a focus on competition in the pharmaceutical industry.\n Mr. Steinfeld has litigated successfully with significant contributions in In re Buspirone Patent &\n Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 1410 (S.D.N.Y.) ($220M settlement); In re Cardizem CD Antitrust Litigation,\n No. 99-MD-1278 (E.D. Mich.) ($110M settlement); In re Relafen Antitrust Litigation, No. 01-12239 (D.\n Mass.) ($175M settlement); In re Remeron Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation, No. 03-cv-0085 (D.N.J.)\n ($75M settlement); In re Terazosin Hydrochloride Antitrust Litigation, No. 99-MDL-1317 (S.D. Fla.) ($72.5M\n settlement); In re Tricor Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litig., No. 05-340 (D. Del.) ($250M settlement); and\n Mylan Pharms., Inc. v. Warner Chilcott, No. 12-cv-3824 (E.D. Pa.) ($12 million settlement).\n Prior to joining Faruqi & Faruqi, Mr. Steinfeld was associated with Grant and Eisenhofer, P.A.\n (2011-2015) and a partner at Garwin, Gerstein and Fisher, LLP, New York (1997-2009).\n Mr. Steinfeld is the author of Nuclear Objections: The Persistent Objector and the Legality of the\n Use of Nuclear Weapons, 62 Brooklyn L. Rev. 1635 (winter, 1996).\n Mr. Steinfeld received his law degree from Brooklyn Law School (J.D., 1997) where he was an\n editor on the Brooklyn Law Review and received several academic awards. Mr. Steinfeld is a member of\n the bars of the States of New York, New Jersey and Massachusetts; and is admitted to practice before the\n United States District Courts for the District New Jersey, Eastern District of New York, Southern District of\n New York, and Western District of New York. Mr. Steinfeld graduated from Brandeis University (B.A.,\n Politics, 1994).\n\n INNESSA MELAMED HUOT\n Innessa M. Huot is a Partner in the firm\u2019s New York office and Chair of the firm\u2019s Employment Practice\n Group.\n Ms. Huot represents workers across the country in both individual and class action lawsuits. Ms.\n Huot has litigated cases in both federal and state courts, involving FLSA claims, state wage and hour\n 21\n\n\n NEW YORK CALIFORNIA PENNSYLVANIA GEORGIA\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-1 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 23 of 30\n\n\n\n\n violations, discrimination and harassment claims, retaliation matters, FMLA and ADA violations, breach of\n contract disputes, and other employment-related violations. Ms. Huot has served as lead or co-lead counsel\n in numerous cases filed against major businesses and corporations and has successfully recovered millions\n of dollars on behalf of her clients.\n Serving as lead or co-lead counsel, some of Ms. Huot\u2019s more recent non-confidential class action\n settlements include the following: Feliciano, et al. v. Metro. Transp. Auth., et al., No. 18-cv-00026-VSB\n (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 21, 2020) ($5.4 million settlement); Morell, et al. v. NYC Green Transp. Grp., LLC, et al.,\n No. 1:18-cv-00918-PKC-VMS (E.D.N.Y. May 8, 2019) ($700,000 settlement, representing 100% of wage\n damages and an additional 75% of liquidated damages); Izzio, et al. v. Century Golf Partners Mgmt., L.P.,\n 3:14-cv-03194-M (N.D. Tex. Feb. 13, 2019) ($1.425 million settlement); Reeves, et al. v. La Pecora Bianca,\n Inc, et al., No. 151153/2018 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.) ($462,500 settlement, representing 100% of economic\n damages); Ackerman v. New York Hospital Medical Center of Queens, No. 702965/2013 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.)\n ($550,000 settlement); Run Them Sweet, LLC v. CPA Global LTD, et al., No. 1:16-cv-1347 (E.D. Va. Oct.\n 6, 2017) ($5.6 million settlement); Strong, et al. v. Safe Auto Ins. Grp., Inc., et al., Case No. 2:16-cv-765\n (S.D. Ohio Aug. 28, 2017) ($250,000 settlement, representing 82% of unpaid overtime and statutory\n damages); and Foster, et al. v. L-3 Commc\u2019ns EoTech, Inc., et al., No. 6:15-cv-03519-BCW (W.D. Mo. July\n 7, 2017) ($51 million settlement).\n Ms. Huot has been designated a \u201cSuper Lawyer\u201d each year since 2017 and has been selected for\n inclusion into the America\u2019s Top 100 High Stakes Litigators list. Ms. Huot is active in multiple bar associations,\n including the Brooklyn Bar Association\u2019s Young Lawyers Section, American Bar Association\u2019s Section of\n Labor and Employment, and the National Employment Lawyers Association (NELA).\n Ms. Huot earned her J.D., magna cum laude, from Pace Law School and her M.B.A. in Finance,\n summa cum laude, from Pace Lubin School of Business. Ms. Huot graduated from Syracuse University with\n a B.A., summa cum laude, in Political Science and International Relations.\n Ms. Huot is licensed to practice law in New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut and is admitted to\n practice before the United States District Courts for the Southern District, Eastern District, Western District,\n and Northern District of New York, the District of New Jersey, and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.\n\n KATHERINE M. LENAHAN\n Katherine M. Lenahan is a Partner in Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP\u2019s New York office.\n\n\n\n\n 22\n\n\n NEW YORK CALIFORNIA PENNSYLVANIA GEORGIA\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-1 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 24 of 30\n\n\n\n\n Prior to joining Faruqi & Faruqi, Ms. Lenahan practiced securities litigation at Entwistle & Cappucci\n LLP. Ms. Lenahan gained further experience through internships for the Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler,\n Administrative Judge for Civil Matters, First Judicial District, and the Kings County District Attorney\u2019s Office.\n Ms. Lenahan graduated from Fordham University (B.A., Political Science, magna cum laude, 2009)\n and Fordham University School of Law (J.D., 2012). While at Fordham Law School, Ms. Lenahan served\n as an associate editor of the Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal and was\n a fellow at the Center on Law and Information Policy.\n Ms. Lenahan is licensed to practice law in New York, and is admitted to the United States District\n Court for the Southern District of New York, and the United States Courts of Appeals for the Second and\n Ninth Circuits.\n\n KRISTYN FIELDS\n Kristyn Fields\u2019 practice is focused on antitrust litigation. Ms. Fields is a Partner in the firm\u2019s New\n York office.\n Prior to joining F&F, Ms. Fields interned for the Honorable Martin Marcus, New York Supreme\n Court, Bronx County. As well, Ms. Fields participated in the Brooklyn Law Incubator & Policy Clinic\n providing pro bono counsel to emerging start-up companies. While at Brooklyn Law School, Ms. Fields\n served as an Executive Articles Editor of the Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial\n Law. Also, Ms. Fields was a member of the Moot Court Honor Society.\n Ms. Fields earned her J.D. from Brooklyn Law School (2016). Ms. Fields earned her undergraduate\n degree from Boston College (B.A., Political Science, 2013).\n Ms. Fields is licensed to practice law in New York.\n\n RAYMOND N. BARTO\n Raymond N. Barto\u2019s practice is focused on antitrust litigation. Mr. Barto is a Partner in the firm\u2019s\n New York office.\n Prior to joining F&F, Mr. Barto was an associate at a prominent New York City law firm where he\n represented consumers, shareholders, and employees in class action cases that involved consumer fraud,\n breach of fiduciary duty, and ERISA.\n While at Brooklyn Law School, Mr. Barto served as an Articles Editor for the Brooklyn Law\n Review. As well, Mr. Barto served as an intern to the Honorable Judge William Pauley III of the United\n States District Court for the Southern District of New York; the United States Attorney\u2019s Office for the\n 23\n\n\n NEW YORK CALIFORNIA PENNSYLVANIA GEORGIA\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-1 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 25 of 30\n\n\n\n\n Eastern District of New York; the litigation department for Marsh & McLennan Companies; and the Kings\n County District Attorney\u2019s Office.\n Mr. Barto earned his J.D, cum laude, from Brooklyn Law School (2013). Mr. Barto earned his\n undergraduate degree from Fordham University (B.A., History, 2007).\n Mr. Barto is licensed to practice law in New York and New Jersey.\n\n DAVID CALVELLO\n David Calvello is a Partner in Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP\u2019s New York office where his focus is litigating\n Antitrust matters.\n Mr. Calvello graduated from the University of Richmond (B.S., 2011) with a double major in Finance\n and Political Science and Pace Law School (J.D., magna cum laude, 2014). He is licensed to practice law\n in New York and New Jersey and is admitted to practice before the United States District Court for New\n Jersey.\n Prior to joining Faruqi & Faruqi, Mr. Calvello was as an Associate at Kaufman Borgeest & Ryan,\n LLP where he focused primarily on insurance coverage matters with respect to Directors & Officers (D&O),\n Errors & Omissions (E&O), and Professional Liability lines of coverage. In law school, Mr. Calvello served\n as an editor on the Pace International Law Review and received the New Rochelle Bar Association Award\n upon graduation. He was also very active in moot court competitions, and competed in the Willem C. Vis\n International Commercial Arbitration Moot held in Vienna, Austria.\n\n LISA OMOTO\n Lisa Omoto is a Partner in Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP's Los Angeles office and focuses her practice on\n consumer protection litigation.\n Prior to joining the firm, Ms. Omoto was a litigator at a prominent defense firm where she defended\n corporations and individuals in a wide variety of complex disputes in federal and state courts.\n Ms. Omoto graduated from Boston College (B.A., 2010) and Santa Clara University School of Law\n (J.D., 2014). She is licensed to practice law in the State of California and is admitted to practice in the\n United States District Courts for the Eastern, Central, and Northern Districts of California.\n\n STEPHEN G. DOHERTY\n Stephen Doherty is Senior Counsel in the Pennsylvania office of Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP. Mr.\n Doherty practices in the area of antitrust law and is significantly involved in prosecuting antitrust class\n 24\n\n\n NEW YORK CALIFORNIA PENNSYLVANIA GEORGIA\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-1 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 26 of 30\n\n\n\n\n actions on behalf of direct purchasers of brand name and generic drugs and charging pharmaceutical\n manufacturers with price fixing and with illegally blocking the market entry of less expensive competitors.\n Earlier in his career, Mr. Doherty litigated consumer fraud and employment discrimination cases\n in both state and federal courts in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. He has served on numerous volunteer\n boards, including Gilda\u2019s Club of Delaware Valley and the BCBA Pro Bono Committee, has served as a\n volunteer instructor for VITA Education Services, and as a pro bono lawyer for the Consumer Bankruptcy\n Assistance Project.\n Mr. Doherty is a 1992 graduate of Temple University Law School, where he was senior staff for\n the Temple Law Review and received several academic awards and is the author of Joint Representation\n Conflicts of Interest: Toward A More Balanced Approach, 65 Temp. L. Rev. 561 (1992). Mr. Doherty is a\n 1988 graduate of Dickinson College (B.A., Anthropology and Latin American Studies).\n\n NEILL CLARK\n Neill Clark is Of Counsel in Faruqi and Faruqi, LLP\u2019s Pennsylvania office.\n Before joining the firm, Mr. Clark was an associate at Berger & Montague, P.C. where he was\n significantly involved in prosecuting antitrust class actions on behalf of direct purchasers of brand name\n drugs and charging pharmaceutical manufacturers with illegally blocking the market entry of less expensive\n competitors.\n Eight of those cases have resulted in substantial settlements totaling over $950 million: In re\n Cardizem CD Antitrust Litig. settled in November 2002 for $110 million; In re Buspirone Antitrust Litig.\n settled in April 2003 for $220 million; In re Relafen Antitrust Litig. settled in February 2004 for $175 million;\n In re Platinol Antitrust Litig. settled in November 2004 for $50 million; In re Terazosin Antitrust Litig. settled\n in April 2005 for $75 million; In re Remeron Antitrust Litig. settled in November 2005 for $75 million; In re\n Ovcon Antitrust Litig. settled in 2009 for $22 million; and In re Tricor Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litig. settled\n in April 2009 for $250 million.\n Mr. Clark was also principally involved in a case alleging a conspiracy among hospitals and the\n Arizona Hospital and Healthcare Association to depress the compensation of per diem and traveling nurses,\n Johnson et al. v. Arizona Hospital and Healthcare Association et al., No. CV07-1292 (D. Ariz.).\n Mr. Clark was selected as a \u201cRising Star\u201d by Pennsylvania Super Lawyers and listed as one of the\n Top Young Lawyers in Pennsylvania in the December 2005 edition of Philadelphia Magazine. Two cases\n in which he has been significantly involved have been featured as \"Noteworthy Cases\" in the NATIONAL\n\n\n 25\n\n\n NEW YORK CALIFORNIA PENNSYLVANIA GEORGIA\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-1 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 27 of 30\n\n\n\n\n LAW JOURNAL articles, \u201cThe Plaintiffs\u2019 Hot List\" (In re Tricor Antitrust Litig. October 5, 2009 and Johnson\n v. Arizona Hosp. and Healthcare Ass'n., October 3, 2011).\n Mr. Clark graduated cum laude from Appalachian State University in 1994 and from Temple\n University Beasley School of Law in 1998, where he earned seven \"distinguished class performance\"\n awards, an oral advocacy award and a \"best paper\" award.\n\n SHAWN R. CLARK\n Shawn Clark\u2019s practice is focused on employment litigation. Mr. Clark is an Associate in the firm\u2019s\n New York office.\n Mr. Clark represents workers in all aspects of high-impact employment litigation in federal and state\n courts. Mr. Clark has litigated cases involving FLSA claims, state wage and hour violations, discrimination\n and harassment, retaliation, FMLA and ADA violations, breach of contract, and other employment-related\n violations. He has frequently appeared as first and second chair in bench and jury trials in the Southern and\n Eastern Districts of New York and has successfully recovered millions of dollars on behalf of his clients.\n Prior to joining Faruqi & Faruqi, Mr. Clark worked as an attorney at a number of prominent New\n York firms representing employees in employment matters. Immediately following law school, Shawn began\n his legal career at the New York City Police Department and New York City Law Department as a legal\n fellow and Assistant Corporation Counsel.\n Mr. Clark has been designated a Super Lawyers Rising Star each year since 2015 and has been\n selected for inclusion to the National Trial Lawyers Top 100 and the Million Dollar Advocates Forum. An\n active member of the legal community, Mr. Clark is a member of the National Employment Lawyers\n Association/New York and the Federal Bar Council.\n Mr. Clark earned his J.D. in 2010 from New York University School of Law, where he was a Dean\u2019s\n Scholar and an Articles Editor for the Journal of Legislation and Public Policy. Mr. Clark graduated magna\n cum laude from the Macaulay Honors College at Hunter College with a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science\n and Religion.\n Mr. Clark is licensed to practice law in New York and is admitted to practice before the United\n States District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York as well as the Second Circuit\n Court of Appeals.\n\n DOLGORA DORZHIEVA\n Dolgora Dorzhieva is an associate in the New York office of Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP and focuses her\n practice on securities litigation.\n 26\n\n\n NEW YORK CALIFORNIA PENNSYLVANIA GEORGIA\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-1 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 28 of 30\n\n\n\n\n Prior to joining Faruqi & Faruqi, Ms. Dorzhieva practiced securities litigation at a national securities\n class action law firm, where she represented investors against entities including Google, Amazon, Deutsche\n Bank, Lucid Motors, and Twitter.\n Ms. Dorzhieva graduated from the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law (2015), where\n she served as an Executive Editor of the California Law Review. She graduated summa cum laude, Phi\n Beta Kappa from City College of New York (2010).\n Following graduation from law school, she clerked for the Honorable Edward M. Chen in the United\n States District Court for the Northern District of California.\n\n MATTHEW A. CONRAD\n Matthew A. Conrad is an associate in the New York office of Faruqi & Faruqi. Mr. Conrad is focused\n on F&F\u2019s securities litigation practice.\n Prior to joining Faruqi & Faruqi, Mr. Conrad was an associate at a regional defense firm where he\n represented business entities in construction, premises, and product liability actions in state and federal\n courts. While in law school, Mr. Conrad interned with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (\u201cFINRA\u201d)\n and the New Jersey Bureau of Securities. Mr. Conrad also served as the Submissions Editor for Cardozo\u2019s\n International and Comparative Law Review.\n Mr. Conrad earned his J.D. from Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law (2018). As well, Mr. Conrad\n earned his undergraduate degree from the University of Maryland (2015).\n Mr. Conrad is admitted to practice in New York State. Mr. Conrad is also admitted to practice in\n the Southern District of New York.\n\n CAMILO BURR\n Camilo Burr\u2019s practice is focused on employment and personal injury litigation. Mr. Burr is an\n Associate in the firm\u2019s New York office.\n Prior to joining the firm, Mr. Burr interned with the firm\u2019s securities litigation practice group.\n Additionally, Mr. Burr gained further litigation experience as a legal intern at the Neighborhood Defender\n Service of Harlem. As well, Mr. Burr participated in the Brooklyn Law Mediation Clinic, providing pro bono\n mediation services at the Kings County Small Claims Court.\n Mr. Burr earned his J.D. from Brooklyn Law School (2019) and his undergraduate degree from\n Boston University (B.A., Political Science; Minor in Archaeology, 2012).\n Mr. Burr is licensed to practice law in New York.\n\n 27\n\n\n NEW YORK CALIFORNIA PENNSYLVANIA GEORGIA\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-1 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 29 of 30\n\n\n\n\n ALEXA N. SALAZAR\n Alexa N. Salazar is an Associate in Faruqi & Faruqi\u2019s New York City office. Ms. Salazar\u2019s practice\n is focused on Employment Law.\n Prior to joining Faruqi & Faruqi, Ms. Salazar was an attorney at a New York City law firm where\n she represented employees on an individual and class basis in employment matters.\n Ms. Salazar counseled her Spanish and English-speaking clients. Ms. Salazar began her legal\n career practicing business immigration at a leading firm representing international clients.\n Ms. Salazar earned her law degree from St. John\u2019s University School of Law (J.D. 2020). As well,\n Ms. Salazar earned her undergraduate degree from Cornell University (B.S. 2016).\n Ms. Salazar is licensed to practice law in New York and New Jersey. As well, the Southern and\n Eastern Districts of New York State.\n\n ZACHARY M. WINKLER\n Zachary Winkler is an associate in Faruqi & Faruqi\u2019s Philadelphia office. Mr. Winkler\u2019s practice is\n focused on Consumer Protection.\n Prior to joining Faruqi & Faruqi, Mr. Winkler practiced plaintiff-side class action litigation with a\n Philadelphia law firm. Mr. Winkler\u2019s legal experience included representing individuals and organizations\n challenging corporate fraud and anticompetitive business practices.\n Mr. Winkler earned his J.D from Georgetown University Law Center (J.D. 2020). While at law\n school, Mr. Winkler was selected to the Barristers\u2019 Council honors society; competed with the trial advocacy\n team; and served as a Teaching Fellow. As well, Mr. Winkler was named a Special Pro Bono Honoree in\n recognition of his 100+ hours of pro bono service. Also, during law school, he served as a legal fellow for\n Congressman Brendan F. Boyle and as a law clerk for the Honorable J.P. Howard III, District of Columbia\n Office of Administrative Hearings. Mr. Winkler received his undergraduate degree from Vanderbilt\n University (B.A. 2017).\n Mr. Winkler is licensed to practice law in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Further, Mr. Winkler\n is admitted to practice before the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.\n\n THANH T. HOANG\n Thanh T. Hoang\u2019s practice focuses on securities litigation. Thanh is an associate in the firm\u2019s New\n York office.\n\n\n\n 28\n\n\n NEW YORK CALIFORNIA PENNSYLVANIA GEORGIA\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-1 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 30 of 30\n\n\n\n\n Before joining Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, Ms. Hoang began her legal career as an Assistant District\n Attorney at the Kings County District Attorney\u2019s Office. There, she represented the People of the State of\n New York in criminal proceedings and gained experience in complex investigations and litigation issues.\n Ms. Hoang earned her dual degree Master of Public Administration and Juris Doctorate with an\n Advanced Certificate in Forensic Accounting from John Jay College of Criminal Justice and City University\n of New York School of Law (2021). Ms. Hoang earned her Bachelor of Science in Physics and Mathematics\n from University of Arkansas (2014).\n Ms. Hoang is licensed to practice law in New York.\n\n\n\n\n 29\n\n\n NEW YORK CALIFORNIA PENNSYLVANIA GEORGIA\n\f","ocr_status":1,"date_upload":"2026-06-24T12:57:11.520570-07:00","document_number":"102","attachment_number":1,"pacer_doc_id":"039011687984","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":2,"description":"Exhibit 1 - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Firm Resume","acms_document_guid":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/483906361/","id":483906361,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/64904094/102/2/wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc/","date_created":"2026-06-24T12:56:53.008684-07:00","date_modified":"2026-06-25T03:39:36.476370-07:00","sha1":"4f05bc5b0aacb0c045d6d0b757d223b83ec8805e","page_count":2,"file_size":81223,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.102.2.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.102.2.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-2 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 1 of 2\n\n\n\n\n EXHIBIT 2\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-2 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 2 of 2\n\n\n\n\n Ampio\n FARUQI & FARUQI, LLP\n TIME REPORT\n\n Categories **\nPROFESSIONAL* HOURS RATE LODESTAR 1 2 3 4 5\n\nNADEEM FARUQI (P) 12.50 $1,050 $13,125.00 12.5\nJAMES \"JOSH\" WILSON (P) 202.30 $950 $192,185.00 39.1 8.4 66.1 20.3 68.4\nROBERT KILLORIN (P) 125.00 $950 $118,750.00 13.1 8.7 50.3 23.9 29\nKATHERINE LENAHAN (P) 151.20 $700 $105,840.00 0.2 14.5 38.2 7.4 90.9\nMEGAN REMMEL (P) 87.30 $700 $61,110.00 1.3 86\nTHOMAS PAPAIN (A) 92.40 $575 $53,130.00 0.2 6.2 5 51.1 29.9\nDYLAN WEEKS (A) 35.10 $475 $16,672.50 20.7 0.2 14.2\nTHANH HOANG (A) 124.90 $475 $59,327.50 120.7 4.2\nMATTHEW CONRAD (A) 224.50 $450 $101,025.00 223.1 1.4\nKAYLA KERSHEN (LC) 14.00 $350 $4,900.00 14\nDEREK BEHNKE (PL) 48.50 $375 $18,187.50 8.4 15.1 7.6 0.8 16.6\nANTHONY ALOISE (PL) 3.80 $375 $1,425.00 3.8\nNICHOLAS HALLORAN (PL) 15.30 $350 $5,355.00 4 6.7 4.6\nCRISTIAN CARRANO (PL) 3.50 $350 $1,225.00 3.5\nEVELYN ZHENG (PL) 12.00 $325 $3,900.00 3 9\n\nTOTALS 1,152.30 $756,157.50 93.00 68.40 277.10 447.30 266.5\n\n(OC) - Of Counsel; (A) - Associate;\n(PL) - Paralegal; (LC) - Law Clerk\n**Categories:\n\n(1) Lead Plaintiff Appointment: Time spent attending to matters related to the lead plaintiff appointment process, including client communications, factual and legal research, and\ndrafting and editing the lead plaintiff briefing.\n(2) Service and Scheduling Matters: Time spent related to service issues and scheduling matters, including correspondence with defense counsel and the court regarding scheduling;\ndrafting and filing scheduling stipulations; serving additional defendants; and researching and drafting the motion for an extension of time to substitute defendant Michael Macaluso (ECF\nNo. 83).\n(3) Amended Complaint: Time spent working on the amended complaint (ECF No. 57), including factual investigation, legal research, drafting, and communicating with the client.\n\n(4) Confirmatory Discovery: Time spent on matters related to confirmatory discovery, including but not limited to: drafting requests for discovery; negotiating the confidentialty\nagreement; conferring with defense counsel about the scope of discovery and the interviewees; reviewing the discovery produced; preparing for the interviews with two Ampio\nrepresentatives; conducting the interviews; and communicating with the client about the same.\n(5) Mediation & Settlement: Time spent on mediation and settlement-related matters (except confirmatory discovery, which is addressed above), including but not limited to: conferring\nwith a damages consultant; conducting research for and drafting the mediation statement; preparing for and attending the mediation session; contacting potential claims administrators\nand reviewing their bids; drafting, reviewing, and editing the settlement Stipulation, the Notices, Claim Form, and Lead Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class\nAction Settlement and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof (ECF Nos. 93-96); drafting the final approval motion papers (excluding work related to the fee motion);\nand communicating with the client, defense counsel, and the mediator about mediation and/or settlement-related matters.\n\f","ocr_status":1,"date_upload":"2026-06-24T12:57:21.352971-07:00","document_number":"102","attachment_number":2,"pacer_doc_id":"039011687985","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":2,"description":"Exhibit 2 - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Time Report","acms_document_guid":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/483906362/","id":483906362,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/64904094/102/3/wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc/","date_created":"2026-06-24T12:56:53.031759-07:00","date_modified":"2026-06-25T05:18:36.906477-07:00","sha1":"11df67311bd911ee1c926d40bd2a7e7374a60a86","page_count":2,"file_size":122646,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.102.3.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.102.3.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-3 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 1 of 2\n\n\n\n\n EXHIBIT 3\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-3 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 2 of 2\n\n\n\n\n Ampio\n Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP\n Expense Report\n\n Category Amount\n eDiscovery Management & Other Research Fees $24,856.49\n\n Investigator $16,106.50\n\n Mediation Fees $12,500.00\n\n Damages Expert $7,160.00\n\n Travel Expenses (including hotels, meals & transportation) $5,087.25*\n\n Filing Fees $626.00\n\n Telephone $99.00\n\n Internal Copies $40.00\n\n TOTAL: $66,475.24\n * Includes an anticipated $4,000 in travel expenses related to the Settlement Hearing.\n\f","ocr_status":1,"date_upload":"2026-06-24T12:57:36.234908-07:00","document_number":"102","attachment_number":3,"pacer_doc_id":"039011687986","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":2,"description":"Exhibit 3 - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Expense Report","acms_document_guid":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/483906363/","id":483906363,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/64904094/102/4/wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc/","date_created":"2026-06-24T12:56:53.055429-07:00","date_modified":"2026-06-25T03:27:01.662944-07:00","sha1":"390a7c927847708688073988325e607177b5f0ec","page_count":4,"file_size":396542,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.102.4.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.102.4.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":"2026-06-24T12:57:29.664696-07:00","document_number":"102","attachment_number":4,"pacer_doc_id":"039011687987","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":2,"description":"Exhibit 4 - Declaration of Tao Wang","acms_document_guid":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/483906364/","id":483906364,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/64904094/102/5/wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc/","date_created":"2026-06-24T12:56:53.076227-07:00","date_modified":"2026-06-25T05:22:09.209625-07:00","sha1":"599b964f44bf726b68135f0cd820c57143262b02","page_count":4,"file_size":470655,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.102.5.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.102.5.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-5 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\npg 1 of 4\n\nEXHIBIT 5\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document102-5 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\npg 2 of 4\n\nDelaware ne\n\nThe First State\n\nI, JEFFREY W. BULLOCK, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF\nDELAWARE, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THE ATTACHED IS A TRUE AND CORRECT\nCOPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF DISSOLUTION OF \u201cAMPIO\nPHARMACEUTICALS, INC.\u201d, FILED IN THIS OFFICE ON THE SIXTEENTH\n\nDAY OF AUGUST, A.D. 2024, AT 9:47 O\u00b0CLOCK A.M.\n\nQTE\n\n\\y\u201d W. Bullock, Secretary of State =)\n\n4803949 8100\nSR# 20243436197\n\nYou may verify this certificate online at corp.delaware.gov/authver.shtml\n\nAuthentication: 204180197\nDate: 08-16-24\n\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 102-5\n\nDocusign Envelope ID: BA?72248-154E-4066-AD3E-A7 1FA1CO46F8\n\nAmpio Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of\n\nCERTIFICATE OF DISSOLUTION\n\npg 3 of 4\n\nOF\n\nfiled 12/23/24\n\nState of Delaware\nSecretary of State\n\nDivision of Corporations\nDelivered 09:47 AM 08/16/2024\nFILED 09:47 AM 08/16/2024\n\nSR 20243436197 - FileNumber 4803949\n\nAMPIO PHARMACEDTICALS, INC.\n\nthe General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, does hereby certify:\n\n1.\n\nThe dissolution of Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. has been duly authorized by the\nBoard of Directors and Shareholders in accordance with subsections (a) and (b) of\n\nSection 275 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.\n\nThe date of filing of the Certificate of Incorporation of the corporation with the\nDelaware Secretary of State was March 24, 2010.\n\nThe date the dissolution was authorized is August 15, 2024.\n\nThe names and addresses of the directors and officers of the corporation are as\n\nfollows:\n\nName\n\nMichael A. Martino\n\nJ, Kevin Buchi\n\nElizabeth Jobes\n\nDavid Stevens\n\nDMFIRM #413427503 vt\n\nTitle(s)\n\nChief Executive Officer,\nChief Financial Officer,\nSecretary and Director\n\nDirector\n\nDirector\n\nDirector\n\nAddress\n\n373 Inverness Parkway\nSuite 400\nEnglewood, CO 80112\n\n373 Inverness Parkway\nSuite 400\nEnglewood, CO 80112\n\n373 Inverness Parkway\nSuite 400\nEnglewood, CO 80112\n\n373 Inverness Parkway\nSuite 400\nEnglewood, CO 80112\n\nUSDC Colorado\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document102-5 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n\nDocusign Envelope ID: BA772248-15A4E-4066-AD3E-A71FA1CD46F8\n\nExecuted on this 15th day of August, 2024.\n\nDMFIRM #413427503 vt\n\npg 4 of 4\n\nAMPIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.\n\nDocuSigned by:\nBy\u2019 BAATF4GFFEBFAGE...\n\nName: Michael A. Martino\nIts: Chief Executive Officer\n\n","ocr_status":1,"date_upload":"2026-06-24T12:57:44.547361-07:00","document_number":"102","attachment_number":5,"pacer_doc_id":"039011687988","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":2,"description":"Exhibit 5 - Ampio's Certificate of Dissolution","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2025-01-09T01:57:40.433555-08:00","date_modified":"2026-06-24T12:55:20.990101-07:00","date_filed":"2024-12-23","time_filed":null,"entry_number":102,"recap_sequence_number":"2024-12-23.004","pacer_sequence_number":290,"description":"DECLARATION of James M. Wilson, Jr. regarding MOTION for Attorney Fees / Lead Counsel's Motion for an Award of Attorneys' Fees, Reimbursement of Expenses, and an Award to Lead Plaintiffs; and Memorandum of Law in Support 101, MOTION for Order to Grant Final Approval of the Class Action Settlement; Memorandum of Law in Support 100 by Plaintiffs Tao Wang, SynWorld Technologies Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Firm Resume, # 2 Exhibit 2 - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Time Report, # 3 Exhibit 3 - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Expense Report, # 4 Exhibit 4 - Declaration of Tao Wang, # 5 Exhibit 5 - Ampio's Certificate of Dissolution)(Wilson, James) (Entered: 12/23/2024)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/413029177/","id":413029177,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/426586668/","id":426586668,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/64904094/99/wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc/","date_created":"2025-01-09T01:57:40.359135-08:00","date_modified":"2026-06-24T12:55:20.789603-07:00","sha1":"4615df4bc7bfd56697c4a3b515ce58d496e38932","page_count":8,"file_size":430002,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.99.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.99.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 1 of 8\n\n\n\n\n IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n\n FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO\n\n TAO WANG and SYNWORLD\n TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION,\n Individually and on Behalf of All Others Case No.: 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-MEH\n Similarly Situated,\n\n Plaintiffs, DECLARATION OF ANNE-MARIE\n MARRA OF SIMPLURIS REGARDING\n v. NOTICE AND SETTLEMENT\n ADMINISTRATION\n AMPIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.\n MICHAEL A. MARTINO,\n MICHAEL MACALUSO,\n HOLLI CHEREVKA,\n DAN STOKELY\n DAVID BAR-OR,\n PHILIP H. COELHO, and\n RICHARD B. GILES,\n\n Defendants.\n\n\n I, ANNE-MARIE MARRA, declare as follows:\n\n 1. I am employed as a Program Manager by Simpluris, Inc. (\u201cSimpluris\u201d), the claims\n\nadministrator in the above-entitled action. Our corporate office address is 3194-C Airport Loop\n\nDr., Costa Mesa, CA 92626. I am over twenty-one years of age and authorized to make this\n\ndeclaration on behalf of Simpluris and myself. I have personal knowledge of the information set\n\nforth herein.\n\n 2. Simpluris has been executing notice plans and administering class action\n\nsettlements since 2007. In that time, we have been appointed in over 9,000 cases and distributed\n\nover $8 billion in funds. Our leadership team has over 100 years of combined industry experience\n\nthat includes some of the largest class action administrations in the United States, including In re:\n\nEquifax, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach, Case No. 1:17-md-2800 (N.D. Ga.) and In re:\n\nPremera Blue Cross Customer Data Security Breach, Case No. 3:15-md-2633 (D. Or.).\n\n Page 1 of 8\n DECLARATION OF ANNE-MARIE MARRA OF SIMPLURIS REGARDING NOTICE AND\n SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATION\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 2 of 8\n\n\n\n\nAdditional representative cases include In re: Ambry Genetics Data Breach Litigation, Case No.\n\n8:20-cv-00791 (C.D. Cal.); Orellana v. Planned Parenthood of Los Angeles, Case No.\n\n21STCV44106, Cal. Sup. Ct. (Los Angeles); Cordova et al v. United Education Institute et al,\n\nCase No. 37-2012-00083573, Cal. Sup. Ct. (San Diego); Shuts v. Covenant Holdco, LLC, Case\n\nNo. RG10551807, Cal. Sup. Ct. (Alameda); Hamilton et al v. Suburban Propane Gas Corp., Case\n\nNo. BC433779, Cal. Sup. Ct. (Los Angeles); Upadhyay et al v. Prometheus Real Estate Group,\n\nCase No. 1-08-CV-118002, Cal. Sup. Ct. (Santa Clara); Starke v. Stanley Black & Decker Inc.,\n\nCase No. C-03-CV-21-001091, Md. Cir. Ct. (Baltimore); and Hale v. Manna Pro Products LLC,\n\nCase No. 2:18-cv-00209 (E.D. Cal.).\n\n 3. Simpluris was approved by Plaintiffs\u2019 Counsel and appointed by the Court in the\n\nOrder Granting Lead Plaintiffs\u2019 Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action\n\nSettlement (\u201cPreliminary Approval Order\u201d) entered on September 24, 2024, to provide settlement\n\nadministration services in this settlement. In this capacity, Simpluris was charged with the\n\nfollowing:\n\n a. Establishing and maintaining a settlement-specific website\n\n (www.AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com);\n\n b. Establishing and maintaining a settlement-specific toll-free phone number\n\n (833-602-5027), offering the opportunity to listen to frequently asked\n\n questions, or to speak with a representative;\n\n c. Establishing a P.O. Box to receive paper Claim Forms, requests for exclusion,\n\n objections to the proposed settlement, undeliverable notices, and any other\n\n correspondence submitted by Settlement Class members;\n\n d. Establishing dedicated email inboxes to receive scans of paper Claim Forms,\n\n electronic filing templates, and any other correspondence submitted by\n\n Settlement Class members and third-party brokers or nominees;\n\n\n\n Page 2 of 8\n DECLARATION OF ANNE-MARIE MARRA OF SIMPLURIS REGARDING NOTICE AND\n SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATION\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 3 of 8\n\n\n\n\n e. Printing and mailing, as needed, a Postcard Notice to potential Settlement\n\n Class members and nominees;\n\n f. Receiving and processing Settlement Class Members\u2019 requests for exclusion\n\n from the proposed settlement;\n\n g. Receiving, processing, and validating Settlement Class Members\u2019 Claim\n\n Forms, whether submitted via email, online, or by mail;\n\n h. Processing and issuing payments via check or electronic payment to eligible\n\n Settlement Class Members;\n\n i. Providing counsel for the Parties with weekly status reports; and\n\n j. Other tasks as the Parties mutually agree or the Court orders Simpluris to\n\n perform.\n\n MAILED NOTICE\n\n 4. Pursuant to the Preliminary Approval Order, Simpluris formatted the Postcard\n\nNotice and the Notice of (I) Pendency of Class Action and Proposed Settlement; (II) Settlement\n\nHearing; and (III) Motion for Attorneys\u2019 Fees and Litigation Expenses (the \u201cLong Form Notice,\u201d\n\nand collectively with the Postcard Notice, \u201cNotices\u201d), and Claim Form. The Long Form Notice\n\nand Claim Form were formatted to be made available on the Settlement website.\n\n 5. The Notices advised Settlement Class members of their right to make a claim,\n\nrequest exclusion from the settlement, object to the settlement, or do nothing, and the implications\n\nof each such action. The Notices advised Settlement Class members of applicable deadlines and\n\nother events, including the Settlement Fairness Hearing, and how Settlement Class members\n\ncould obtain additional information.\n\n 6. On May 15, 2024, Counsel for Defendants provided Simpluris with the Equiniti\n\nList containing 20 known Settlement Class members\u2019 names and mailing addresses who had held\n\na balance or engaged in trades of Ampio Common Stock during the Class Period. Simpluris\n\n\n\n Page 3 of 8\n DECLARATION OF ANNE-MARIE MARRA OF SIMPLURIS REGARDING NOTICE AND\n SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATION\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 4 of 8\n\n\n\n\nconfirmed with the parties that one (1) of the entities included on the Equiniti list was excluded\n\nfrom the Settlement Class definition as a defendant.\n\n 7. Upon receipt of the Equiniti List, Simpluris \u201cscrubbed\u201d the data to ensure it was\n\nin proper format for distributing the Postcard Notice via U.S. Mail. In an effort to ensure that the\n\nNotice would be delivered to class members, Simpluris compared the address data against the\n\nUnited States Postal Service (\u201cUSPS\u201d) National Change of Address (\u201cNCOA\u201d) database and\n\nupdated the data to a Settlement-specific database with the changes received from NCOA.\n\n 8. On October 15, 2024, Simpluris mailed the Postcard Notice to the 19 Settlement\n\nClass Members in the Equiniti List. Attached hereto as Exhibits A through C are true and correct\n\ncopies of the Postcard Notice, Long Form Notice, and Claim Form, respectively.\n\n 9. In addition to the initial list of known Settlement Class members from Equiniti, on\n\nOctober 15, 2024, Simpluris also mailed a copy of the Postcard Notice with a cover letter\n\n(\u201cNominee Notice Packet\u201d) explaining the Settlement to 3,489 known securities brokers or third-\n\nparty nominees who engage in securities trading or representation. The Nominee Notice Packet\n\nexplained that, under the terms of the Preliminary Approval Order, the nominees had ten (10)\n\ndays from their receipt of the Postcard Notice to submit a copy of the contact information for their\n\nclients who had purchased Ampio common stock within the Class Period or request sufficient\n\nblank Postcard Notices to forward to all such clients who had purchased Ampio common stock\n\nduring the Class Period. Nominees were also directed to a dedicated page on the Settlement\n\nWebsite that explained their options and provided a method for them to file claims on behalf of\n\ntheir clients. Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of the Nominee Notice\n\nPacket.\n\n 10. As of December 20, 2024, Simpluris has also received an additional five (5)\n\nNominee Lists containing names and addresses of potential class members as provided by third-\n\nparty nominees, resulting in the mailing of 665 Postcard Notices, for a total of 684 direct-mailed\n\nPostcard Notices by Simpluris.\n\n Page 4 of 8\n DECLARATION OF ANNE-MARIE MARRA OF SIMPLURIS REGARDING NOTICE AND\n SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATION\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 5 of 8\n\n\n\n\n 11. As of December 20, 2024, Simpluris has also received five (5) requests for packets\n\nof Postcard Notices with space for the Nominee to affix their own return address and include their\n\nclient contact information, resulting in the mailing of 21,030 blank Postcard Notices to Nominees\n\nto distribute to their clients. These packets were shipped via FedEx and all successfully delivered.\n\n 12. As of December 20, 2024, 52 Postcard Notices were returned to Simpluris by the\n\npost office. For the Postcard Notices returned without a forwarding address, Simpluris first\n\nattempted to locate anyone whose Postcard Notice was returned by USPS as undeliverable (and\n\nwhere an updated address was not provided) by conducting a second NCOA search on the\n\nreturned Postcard Notice. If this additional NCOA search did not result in an updated address for\n\nthe Postcard Notice, Simpluris performed an advanced address search (i.e. skip trace) on all of\n\nthese addresses by using Accurint, a reputable research tool owned by Lexis-Nexis. Simpluris\n\nused the Class Member\u2019s name and previous address to locate a more current address. Of the 52\n\nreturned Postcard Notices, 11 Postcard Notices were re-mailed to either a newfound address or\n\nwith forwarding addresses provided by USPS. The remaining 41 Postcard Notices were\n\nundeliverable because no other address was available. Postcard Notices continue to be returned\n\nto Simpluris by the USPS, however the additional address research efforts were concluded by\n\nNovember 29, 2024 in accordance with the Preliminary Approval Order.\n\n 13. As of December 20, 2024, 321 Nominee Notice Packets were returned by the post\n\noffice. For the Nominee Notice Packet returned without a forwarding address, Simpluris\n\nperformed a second NCOA search, and if no updated address was available, Simpluris performed\n\na skip trace on all of these addresses by using Accurint. Simpluris used the Nominee\u2019s business\n\nname and previous address to locate a more current address. Of the 321 returned Nominee Notice\n\nPackets, 175 Nominee Notice Packets were re-mailed to either a newfound address or with\n\nforwarding addresses provided by USPS. The remaining 146 Nominee Notice Packets were\n\nundeliverable because no other address was available. Nominee Notice Notices continue to be\n\n\n\n Page 5 of 8\n DECLARATION OF ANNE-MARIE MARRA OF SIMPLURIS REGARDING NOTICE AND\n SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATION\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 6 of 8\n\n\n\n\nreturned to Simpluris by the USPS, however the additional address research efforts were\n\nconcluded by November 29, 2024 in accordance with the Preliminary Approval Order.\n\n 14. As of December 20, 2024, Simpluris has mailed a total of 21,714 direct-mailed or\n\nblank Nominee-addressed Postcard Notices.\n\n PUBLICATION NOTICE\n\n 15. Simpluris caused the Publication Notice to be published in Investor\u2019s Business\n\nDaily on Monday, October 28, 2024. Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of\n\nthe Proof of Publication and published Notice.\n\n 16. Simpluris also issued the Publication Notice as a national Press Release on\n\nMonday, October 28, 2024. Attached hereto as Exhibit F is a true and correct copy of the Pickup\n\nReport and Press Release.\n\n WEBSITE AND TELEPHONE NUMBER\n\n 17. Simpluris prepared and maintains a Settlement website,\n\nwww.AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com, that includes important dates and deadlines, and\n\nSettlement-related documents, such as the Settlement Agreement. An online Claim Form module\n\nis active during the Claim Period and will be turned off once the Claims Deadline passes. The\n\nwebsite has been available to the public since October 15, 2024. As of December 20, 2024, the\n\nwebsite has been visited by 1,174 unique visitors with 5,021 page views.\n\n 18. A settlement specific toll-free telephone number was included in the Postcard\n\nNotice and on the Settlement Website for the purpose of allowing the Settlement Class Members\n\nto make inquiries regarding the Settlement. The system is accessible 24 hours a day, 7 days a\n\nweek, and will remain in operation throughout the settlement process. Callers have the option to\n\nspeak with a live call center representative during normal business hours. The toll-free telephone\n\nnumber included in both forms of the Notice was 833-602-5027. This number is active and has\n\nbeen available to the public since October 14, 2024. As of December 20, 2024, the settlement\n\n\n\n Page 6 of 8\n DECLARATION OF ANNE-MARIE MARRA OF SIMPLURIS REGARDING NOTICE AND\n SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATION\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 7 of 8\n\n\n\n\nspecific toll-free telephone number has received 48 phone calls, with 39 of those calls routed to\n\nlive agents.\n\n REQUESTS FOR EXCLUSION AND OBJECTIONS\n\n 19. The postmark deadline for Settlement Class Members to submit a request for\n\nexclusion (\u201cOpt Out\u201d) from the proposed Settlement or object to the proposed Settlement is\n\nJanuary 29, 2025.\n\n 20. As of December 20, 2024, Simpluris has received zero (0) requests for exclusion\n\nfrom the proposed Settlement from Settlement Class Members.\n\n 21. Although objections are required to be filed with the Court and mailed to counsel\n\nfor the Parties, claims administrators occasionally receive objections nonetheless. As of\n\nDecember 20, 2024, Simpluris has received zero (0) objections to the proposed Settlement from\n\nSettlement Class Members.\n\n CLAIM FORMS RECEIVED AND PROCESSED\n\n 22. The postmark deadline for Class Members to submit a Claim Form to Simpluris is\n\nJanuary 13, 2025. As of December 20, 2024, Simpluris has received 121 Claim Forms from\n\nindividuals, and two (2) claim forms from Nominees on behalf of their clients. Simpluris is in the\n\nprocess of evaluating the Claim Forms, the documents provided in support of the claims, and the\n\ntransactions claimed in order to evaluate the Claims for completeness and calculate an initial\n\nRecognized Loss for each claimant. If a Class Member filed a Claim Form with a curable\n\ndeficiency, Simpluris will mail the Class Member a notice providing information on how to cure\n\nthe deficiency and provide 30 days to cure the deficiency. As the deadline to submit claims has\n\nnot passed, it is expected that the total number of claims will change.\n\n NOMINEE REIMBURSEMENT REQUESTS\n\n 23. As of December 20, 2024, Simpluris has received one (1) request from a Nominee\n\nfor reimbursement of their costs in notifying their clients. Simpluris has corresponded with the\n\nparties regarding whether this request is reasonable and payable.\n\n Page 7 of 8\n DECLARATION OF ANNE-MARIE MARRA OF SIMPLURIS REGARDING NOTICE AND\n SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATION\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 8 of 8\n\n\n\n\n ADMINISTRATION COSTS\n\n 24. Simpluris\u2019 total costs for services in connection with the administration of this\n\nSettlement, including fees incurred and anticipated future costs for completion of the\n\nadministration, is currently $47,892.00, and is not expected to exceed $75,000.00.\n\n\n\n I declare under penalty of perjury that the above is true and correct and that this\n\nDeclaration was executed this 20th day of December, 2024, in Seattle, Washington.\n\n\n __________________________________\n ANNE-MARIE MARRA\n\n\n\n\n Page 8 of 8\n DECLARATION OF ANNE-MARIE MARRA OF SIMPLURIS REGARDING NOTICE AND\n SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATION\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2025-08-12T06:46:06.717284-07:00","document_number":"99","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"039011687848","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/483906408/","id":483906408,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/64904094/99/1/wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc/","date_created":"2026-06-24T12:57:40.788345-07:00","date_modified":"2026-06-24T12:58:17.213954-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":3,"file_size":192880,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"99","attachment_number":1,"pacer_doc_id":"039011687849","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":2,"description":"Exhibit A - Postcard Notice","acms_document_guid":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/483906409/","id":483906409,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/64904094/99/2/wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc/","date_created":"2026-06-24T12:57:40.818066-07:00","date_modified":"2026-06-25T05:25:56.423070-07:00","sha1":"f0dd817a5d41f6702250a18553ccef2329b7da57","page_count":22,"file_size":717330,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.99.2.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.99.2.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-2 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 1 of 22\n\n\n\n\n EXHIBIT B\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-2 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 2 of 22\n\n\n\n\n NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT\n Wang, et al. v. Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:22-CV-02105-WJM-MEH\n United States District Court for the District of Colorado\n\nIf you purchased or otherwise acquired Ampio\u2019s common stock between December 29,\n2020 and August 2, 2022, inclusive, and were damaged thereby, then you may be entitled to\na payment from a class action settlement.1\n\n A federal court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.\n\n \uf0b7 The purpose of this notice (the \u201cNotice\u201d) is to inform you of the pendency of the\n securities class action in United States federal court (the \u201cAction\u201d), the proposed\n settlement of the Action (the \u201cSettlement\u201d), and a hearing to be held by the Court to\n consider: (i) whether the Settlement should be approved; (ii) whether the proposed plan\n for allocating the proceeds of the Settlement (the \u201cPlan of Allocation\u201d) should be\n approved; and (iii) whether Lead Counsel\u2019s Fee and Expense Application should be\n approved. This Notice describes important rights you may have and what steps you must\n take if you wish to participate in the Settlement, wish to object, or wish to be excluded\n from the Settlement Class.\n\n \uf0b7 On September 24, 2024, the Court preliminarily approved the Settlement. If given final\n approval by the Court, the proposed Settlement will create a $3,000,000 Settlement Fund,\n plus any interest or income earned thereon, for the benefit of eligible Settlement Class\n Members, less any attorneys\u2019 fees, expenses, and costs awarded by the Court, Notice and\n Administration Expenses, and Taxes.\n\n \uf0b7 This Settlement resolves claims by Tao Wang and SynWorld Technologies Corporation,\n Lead Plaintiffs in the Action (\u201cLead Plaintiffs\u201d), individually and on behalf of each\n member of the Settlement Class, against Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (\u201cAmpio\u201d), and\n Michael A. Martino, Holli Cherevka, Dan Stokely, David Bar-Or, Philip H. Coelho, and\n Richard B. Giles (the \u201cIndividual Defendants,\u201d 2 with Ampio, the \u201cDefendants,\u201d and\n collectively with Lead Plaintiffs, the \u201cParties\u201d). Defendants deny all allegations of\n misconduct. The two sides disagree on whether the investors could have won at trial, and\n if so, how much money they could have won.\n\n\n 1\n All capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this document shall have the meaning\n provided in the Stipulation of Settlement dated May 13, 2024 (the \u201cStipulation\u201d).\n2\n While Michael Macaluso was named as a Defendant in the original Complaint, on\nSeptember 20, 2023, a Suggestion of Death of Defendant Michael Macaluso and an Amended\nMotion to Withdraw as Attorney for Defendant Michael Macaluso were filed. ECF Nos. 53-55.\nOn September 27, 2023, United States Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty issued a Minute\nOrder granting the Amended Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Defendant Michael Macaluso.\nECF No. 56. Defendant Michael Macaluso did not participate in negotiation of the settlement-\nin-principle.\n Page 1 of 21\n NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-2 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 3 of 22\n\n\n\n\n \uf0b7 Attorneys for Lead Plaintiffs will ask the Court for 28% of the Settlement Fund and up to\n $75,000 in reimbursement for expenses incurred in prosecuting this lawsuit. Lead\n Counsel also intends to ask the Court to grant Lead Plaintiffs an award of up to $5,000\n for reasonable costs and expenses (including lost wages) directly relating to their\n representation of the class. If approved by the Court, these amounts (totaling\n approximately $0.007 per allegedly damaged share) will be paid from the Settlement\n Fund.\n\n \uf0b7 The estimated average recovery, after deducting attorneys\u2019 fees and expenses,\n Administrative costs,3 and Lead Plaintiffs\u2019 costs and expenses (if approved by the Court),\n is $0.015 per share).\n\n \uf0b7 Your legal rights are affected whether you act or do not act. Read this Notice\n carefully.\n\n\n YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT\n\n SUBMIT A CLAIM The only way to get a payment. See Question 9\n FORM BY JANUARY 13, below for details.\n 2025\n\n Get no payment. This is the only option that,\n assuming your claim is timely brought, might allow\n EXCLUDE YOURSELF BY you to ever bring or be part of any other lawsuit\n JANUARY 29, 2025 against Defendants and/or the other Released\n Defendant Parties (as defined below) concerning the\n Released Claims (as defined below). See Question\n 12 below for details.\n\n Write to the Court about why you do not like the\n Settlement, the proposed Plan of Allocation, Lead\n OBJECT BY JANUARY 29, Counsel\u2019s application for an award of attorneys\u2019 fees\n 2025 and payment of expenses, and/or an award of\n reasonable costs and expenses to Lead Plaintiffs. If\n you object, you will still be a member of the\n Settlement Class. See Question 16 below for details.\n Ask to speak in Court about the Settlement at the\n GO TO A HEARING ON\n Settlement Hearing. See Question 20 below for\n FEBRUARY 19, 2025, AND\n details.\n FILE A NOTICE OF\n\n 3\n The estimated notice and claims administration costs for this Settlement, which shall be\n paid from the Settlement Fund, are $45,392. The cost is only an estimate, however, as the\n administration has not fully commenced as of the date of this Notice. Based upon the estimate,\n the notice and administration costs per share would be approximately $0.0003.\n Page 2 of 21\n NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-2 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 4 of 22\n\n\n\n\n INTENTION TO APPEAR\n BY JANUARY 29, 2025\n\n\n Get no payment AND give up your rights to bring\n DO NOTHING\n your own individual action. See Question 21 below\n for details.\n\n \uf0b7 These rights and options - and the deadlines to exercise them - are explained in this\n notice.\n\n \uf0b7 The Court in charge of this case still has to decide whether to approve the Settlement.\n Payments will be made to all Settlement Class Members who timely submit valid Claim\n Forms if the Court approves the Settlement and any appeals are resolved and do not\n reverse the Settlement approval. Please be patient.\n\n SUMMARY OF THE NOTICE\n\nStatement of Plaintiffs\u2019 Recovery\n\n Subject to Court approval, Lead Plaintiffs, on behalf of the Settlement Class, have\nentered into a proposed Settlement with Defendants that, if approved by the Court, will resolve\nthis Action in its entirety. Pursuant to the proposed Settlement, a Settlement Fund consisting of\n$3 million in cash (the \u201cSettlement Amount\u201d), plus any accrued interest or earnings thereon (the\n\u201cSettlement Fund\u201d), has been established.\n\n Estimated Average Amount of Recovery Per Share\n\n Based on Lead Plaintiffs\u2019 consulting damages expert\u2019s analysis, it is estimated that if\n Settlement Class Members submit claims for 100% of Ampio common stock entitled to\n participate in the Settlement, the estimated average recovery per share would be $0.02 per share\n before deduction of Court-approved fees and expenses, and approximately $0.015 per share\n after Court-approved fees and expenses are deducted. Please note, however, that these average\n recovery amounts are only estimates and an individual Settlement Class Member may recover\n more or less than these estimated amounts. As described more fully below in the Plan of\n Allocation beginning on page 16, an individual Settlement Class Member\u2019s actual recovery will\n depend on several factors, including: (a) the total number of claims submitted; (b) the amount of\n the Net Settlement Fund; (c) when the Settlement Class Member purchased his, her, or its\n Ampio stock; and (d) whether and when the Settlement Class Member sold his, her, or its\n Ampio stock.\n\n Statement of Potential Outcome of the Case if the Action Continued to be Litigated\n\n The Parties disagree about both liability and damages and do not agree on the damages\n that would be recoverable if Lead Plaintiffs were to prevail on each claim asserted against\n Defendants. The issues on which the Parties disagree include, for example: (i) whether the\n Page 3 of 21\n NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-2 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 5 of 22\n\n\n\n\n statements made or facts allegedly omitted were materially false or misleading, or otherwise\n actionable under the federal securities laws; (ii) the causes of the loss in the value of the stock;\n and (iii) the amount of alleged damages, if any, that could be recovered at trial.\n\n Defendants have denied and continue to deny any wrongdoing, deny that they have\n committed any act or omission giving rise to any liability or violation of law, and deny that\n Lead Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class Members have suffered any loss attributable to\n Defendants\u2019 actions. While Lead Plaintiffs believe they have meritorious claims, they\n recognize that there are significant obstacles in the way to recovery.\n\n Statement of Attorneys\u2019 Fees and Expenses Sought\n\n Lead Counsel will apply to the Court for attorneys\u2019 fees of 28% of the Settlement Fund,\n which includes any accrued interest or earnings thereon. Lead Counsel has not received any\n payment for their services rendered or expenses incurred in conducting this Action on behalf of\n Lead Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class. Lead Counsel will also apply for payment of expenses\n incurred by Lead Counsel in prosecuting the Action of up to $75,000, plus accrued interest,\n which may include an application pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of\n 1995 (\u201cPSLRA\u201d) for the reasonable costs and expenses of Lead Plaintiffs of up to $5,000\n directly relating to their representation of the Settlement Class. Collectively, these applications\n are referred to as the \u201cFee and Expense Application.\u201d If approved by the Court, these amounts\n (totaling approximately $0.006 per share, assuming claims are filed for all shares eligible to\n participate in the Settlement) will be paid from the Settlement Fund.\n\n Reasons for the Settlement\n\n For Lead Plaintiffs, the principal reason for the Settlement is the immediate benefit of a\n substantial cash recovery to the Settlement Class. This benefit must be compared to the\n uncertainty of being able to prove the allegations in the operative complaint; the risk that the\n Court may grant, in whole or in part, some or all of the anticipated motions to dismiss or\n motions for summary judgment to be filed by Defendants; the attendant risks of litigation,\n especially in complex actions such as this, as well as the difficulties and delays inherent in such\n litigation (including any trial and appeals).\n\n For Defendants, who deny all allegations of wrongdoing or liability whatsoever and\n deny that any Settlement Class Members were damaged, the principal reasons for entering into\n the Settlement are to end the burden, expense, uncertainty, and risk of further litigation.\n\n Identification of Legal Representatives\n\n Lead Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class are represented by Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP,\n Court-appointed Lead Counsel. Any questions regarding the Settlement should be directed to\n James M. Wilson, Jr. at Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, 685 Third Avenue, 26th Floor, New York, NY\n 10017, (212) 983-9330, jwilson@faruqilaw.com.\n\n\n\n Page 4 of 21\n NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-2 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 6 of 22\n\n\n\n\n BASIC INFORMATION\n\n 1. Why did I get the Postcard Notice?\n\n You or someone in your family, or an investment account for which you serve as a\n custodian, may have purchased or otherwise acquired Ampio common stock between December\n 29, 2020, and August 2, 2022, inclusive. This Notice explains the Action, the Settlement,\n Settlement Class Members\u2019 legal rights, what benefits are available, who is eligible for them,\n and how to get them. Receipt of the Postcard Notice does not mean that you are a Member of\n the Settlement Class or that you will be entitled to receive a payment. If you wish to be\n eligible for a payment, you are required to submit the Claim Form available on the\n settlement website, www.AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com.\n\n The court directed this Notice be made available to Settlement Class Members to inform\n them of the terms of the proposed Settlement and about all of their options, before the Court\n decides whether to approve the Settlement at the upcoming hearing to consider the fairness,\n reasonableness, and adequacy of the Settlement, the proposed Plan of Allocation, and Lead\n Counsel\u2019s Fee and Expense Application (the \u201cSettlement Hearing\u201d).\n\n The Court in charge of the case is the United States District Court for the District of\n Colorado, and the Action is known as Tao Wang and SynWorld Technologies Corp. v. Ampio\n Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., No. 1:22-CV-02105-WJM-MEH (D. Colo.).\n\n 2. What is a class action?\n\n In a class action, one or more plaintiffs, called lead plaintiffs or class representatives, sue\n on behalf of people who have similar claims. The individuals and entities on whose behalf the\n class representative is suing are known as class members. One court resolves the issues in the\n case for all class members, except for those who choose to exclude themselves from the class if\n exclusion is permitted by applicable rules of procedure.\n\n 3. What is this case about and what has happened so far?\n\n This is a federal securities class action lawsuit.\n\n Ampio is an early-stage pharmaceutical company based in Englewood, Colorado, USA.\n Lead Plaintiffs allege that during the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or\n misleading statements regarding its commercial drug candidate Ampion\u00ae, as alleged in the\n Amended Class Action Complaint (\u201cAC\u201d).\n\n On August 17, 2022, an initial putative securities class action lawsuit was filed in the\n United States District Court for the District of Colorado (\u201cCourt\u201d), captioned Christopher Kain\n v. Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-02105. ECF No. 1. On August 9,\n 2023, Senior United States District Judge William J. Mart\u00ednez issued an Order appointing Tao\n Wang and SynWorld Technologies Corporation as Lead Plaintiffs, and Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP,\n as Lead Counsel. ECF No. 42.\n\n Page 5 of 21\n NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-2 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 7 of 22\n\n\n\n\n On October 16, 2023, Lead Plaintiffs filed an amended class action complaint (the\n \u201cComplaint\u201d), ECF No. 57, asserting claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities\n Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder against Defendants, alleging that\n Defendants made materially false and misleading statements and omissions. The Complaint\n alleged, among other things, that the price of Ampio common stock was artificially inflated\n during the putative Class Period as a result of the allegedly false and misleading statements, and\n declined when the truth was alleged to have been revealed on April 20, 2022, May 16, 2022,\n and August 3, 2022.\n\n On November 17, 2023, a joint stipulated and unopposed motion was filed for an\n extension of time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint in light of the Parties\u2019\n agreement to mediate. ECF Nos. 80-81. Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty granted the\n motion in part and ordered the Parties to \u201cjointly file a status report with the Court within five\n days of the Parties or the mediator declaring an impasse in the mediation process or the Parties\n reaching a resolution, advising the Court of the status of the mediation.\u201d ECF No. 82.\n\n On January 4, 2024, the Parties participated in a mediation session, conducted by Robert\n E. Meyer, Esq., of JAMS. During the mediation, the Parties reached an agreement-in-principle,\n subject to certain Confirmatory Discovery and Court approval, to settle and release the claims\n asserted against Defendants in the Action.\n\n On or about February 16, 2024, Defendants commenced their production of documents\n in connection with the Confirmatory Discovery to allow Lead Plaintiffs to confirm the adequacy\n of the Settlement.\n\n 4. How and when was the Settlement reached?\n\n The Parties engaged Robert E. Meyer, Esq., of JAMS (the \u201cMediator\u201d), a well-\n respected and highly experienced mediator and former securities litigator, to explore a potential\n negotiated resolution of the claims in the Action. The mediation involved an extended\n discussion about a potential resolution, and was preceded by the exchange of mediation\n statements. During the January 4, 2024 mediation, the Parties reached an agreement-in-\n principle, subject to certain Confirmatory Discovery and Court approval, to settle and release\n the claims asserted against Defendants in the Action in exchange for a lump sum cash payment\n of $3,000,000. The Parties thereafter negotiated the terms of the final settlement Stipulation.\n The Stipulation (together with its exhibits) constitutes the final and binding agreement between\n the Parties.\n\n The Settlement was reached after arm\u2019s-length negotiations between Lead Counsel and\n counsel for Defendants, and only after: (a) Lead Counsel conducted a lengthy investigation into\n the facts alleged in the Action, which included an investigation by a private investigator; (b)\n Lead Counsel drafted the amended complaint; (c) Lead Counsel researched the applicable law\n with respect to the claims against Defendants and the potential defenses thereto; (d) Lead\n Counsel consulted with a damages expert; (e) the Parties exchanged detailed mediation\n statements and exhibits; (f) the Parties conducted a mediation and engaged in settlement\n\n Page 6 of 21\n NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-2 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 8 of 22\n\n\n\n\n negotiations; and (g) Lead Counsel reviewed thousands of pages of discovery that Defendants\n provided following the mediation to gauge the strengths and weaknesses of the Action and\n Defendants\u2019 potential defenses thereto to make sure that the Settlement Amount was fair,\n reasonable, and adequate.\n\n WHO IS IN THE SETTLEMENT\n\n To see if you will get money from this Settlement, you first have to determine if you are\n a Settlement Class Member.\n\n 5. How do I know if I am a part of the Settlement?\n\n Subject to certain exceptions identified below, everyone who fits this description is a\n Settlement Class Member: all Persons who purchased or otherwise acquired Ampio common\n stock between December 29, 2020, and August 2, 2022, inclusive, and who suffered damages\n thereby.\n\n Receipt of the Postcard Notice does not mean that you are a Settlement Class Member.\n The Parties do not have access to your transactions in Ampio stock. Please check your\n records or contact your broker to see if you are a member of the Settlement Class.\n\n 6. Are there exceptions to being included?\n\n Yes. There are some individuals and entities that are excluded from the Class by\n definition. Excluded from the Settlement Class are (i) Defendants; (ii) members of the\n immediate family of each of the Individual Defendants; (iii) all subsidiaries and affiliates of\n Ampio and the current and former directors and officers of Ampio and its subsidiaries or\n affiliates; (iv) all persons, firms, trusts, corporations, officers, directors, and any other individual\n or entity in which any Defendant has a controlling interest; and (v) the legal representatives,\n agents, affiliates, heirs, successors-in-interest or assigns of all such excluded parties.\n\n Also excluded from the Settlement Class will be any Person who or which timely and\n validly seeks exclusion from the Settlement Class in accordance with the requirements\n explained in Question 12 below.\n\n\n 7. What if I am still not sure if I am included?\n\n If you are still not sure whether you are included, you can ask for free help by calling 1-\n 833-602-5027 or visiting www.AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com. You can also fill out and\n submit the Claim Form described on page 8, in Question 9, to see if you qualify.\n\n\n\n\n Page 7 of 21\n NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-2 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 9 of 22\n\n\n\n\n THE SETTLEMENT BENEFITS \u2013 WHAT YOU GET\n\n 8. What does the Settlement provide?\n\n In exchange for the Settlement and release of the Released Claims against the Released\n Defendant Parties, Defendants have agreed to create a $3 million cash fund for the Settlement\n Class. After deductions for Court-awarded fees, expenses, and costs, settlement administration\n costs, and any applicable Taxes, the balance of the Settlement Fund (the \u201cNet Settlement Fund\u201d)\n will be distributed pro rata pursuant to the \u201cPlan of Allocation\u201d among all Settlement Class\n Members who submit valid and timely Claim Forms and are found to be eligible to receive a\n distribution from the Net Settlement Fund (\u201cAuthorized Claimants\u201d).\n\n The Plan of Allocation, which is subject to Court approval, is discussed in more detail\n on pages 16-21 of this Notice.\n\n 9. How can I receive payment?\n\n To qualify for a payment, you must submit a timely and valid Claim Form with\n supporting documents. A Claim Form has been made available on the website dedicated to the\n Settlement: www.AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com. You can request that a Claim Form be\n mailed to you by calling the Claims Administrator toll-free at (833) 602-5027. Please read the\n instructions contained in the Claim Form carefully, fill out the Claim Form, include all the\n documents the form requests, sign it, and either mail it to the Claims Administrator, submit it\n through email to info@AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com, or online on the website\n www.AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com, so it is postmarked (or received if sent via email or\n submitted online) no later than January 13, 2025.\n\n If you have large numbers of transactions, you may request, or may be requested to,\n submit information regarding your transactions in electronic files. If you wish to submit your\n transaction data electronically, you must contact the Claims Administrator at\n info@AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com or visit their website at\n www.AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com to obtain the required file layout. You must still timely\n submit a signed Claim Form by mail, via email, or online, as specified above.\n\n No electronic files will be considered to have been properly submitted unless the Claims\n Administrator issues to the claimant a written acknowledgement of receipt and acceptance of\n electronically submitted data. All claimants MUST timely submit a signed Claim Form to be\n potentially eligible for a payment from this Settlement.\n\n 10. When will I receive my payment?\n\n The Court will hold the Settlement Hearing on February 19, 2025, at 10:30 a.m., to\n decide whether to approve the Settlement in the Action. If the Court approves the Settlement,\n there may be appeals after that. It is always uncertain whether these appeals can be resolved,\n and resolving them can take time, perhaps more than a year. It also takes time for all the Claim\n Forms to be processed. Please be patient.\n\n Page 8 of 21\n NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-2 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 10 of 22\n\n\n\n\n 11. What am I giving up to receive a payment or stay in the Settlement Class?\n\n If you are a Settlement Class Member, unless you exclude yourself, you are staying in\n the Class, and that means that, upon the \u201cEffective Date,\u201d you will release all \u201cReleased\n Plaintiffs\u2019 Claims\u201d (as defined below) against the \u201cDefendants\u2019 Releasees\u201d (as defined below).\n\n \u201cReleased Plaintiffs\u2019 Claims\u201d means all claims, rights, causes of action, duties,\n obligations, demands, actions, debts, sums of money, suits, contracts, agreements, promises,\n damages and liabilities, of every nature and description, whether known or Unknown Claims,\n whether arising under federal, state, local, common, statutory, administrative, or foreign law, or\n any other law, rule, or regulation, at law or in equity, whether fixed or contingent, whether\n foreseen or unforeseen, whether accrued or unaccrued, whether liquidated or unliquidated,\n whether matured or unmatured, whether indirect, representative, direct, class or individual in\n nature, whether suspected or unsuspected, whether foreign or domestic, that have been asserted,\n could have been asserted or could in the future be asserted against Defendants or any of the\n Defendants\u2019 Releasees that arise out of or relate in any way to (i) the allegations, transactions,\n acts, facts, events, matters, occurrences, representations or omissions involved, set forth, alleged\n or referred to in this Action, and (ii) the purchase, acquisition, sale or disposition of Ampio\n common stock during the Class Period. The following claims are explicitly excluded from\n release: (1) all claims related to the enforcement of the Settlement; and (2) any claims of any\n Person or entity who or which submits a request for exclusion from the Settlement that is\n accepted by the Court.\n\n \u201cDefendants\u2019 Releasees\u201d means Defendants, and any and all of their related parties in\n any forum, including, without limitation, any and all of their current, former, or future parents,\n subsidiaries, affiliates, predecessors, successors, divisions, investment funds, joint ventures and\n general or limited partnerships, and each of their respective current or former officers, directors,\n trustees, partners, shareholders, owners, members, contractors, subcontractors, auditors,\n principals, agents, managing agents, employees, attorneys, accountants, advisors, investment\n bankers, underwriters, co-insurers, reinsurers, insurers or assigns, in their capacities as such, as\n well as each of the Individual Defendants\u2019 and Michael Macaluso\u2019s Immediate Family\n members, heirs, trusts, trustees, executors, administrators, personal or legal representatives,\n estates, beneficiaries, agents, attorneys, accountants, insurers, co-insurers, reinsurers, advisors,\n and assigns, in their capacities as such.\n\n \u201cReleased Defendants\u2019 Claims\u201d means all claims and causes of action of every nature\n and description, whether known or Unknown Claims, whether arising under federal, state, local,\n common, statutory, administrative, or foreign law, or any other law, rule, or regulation, at law or\n in equity, whether fixed or contingent, whether foreseen or unforeseen, whether accrued or\n unaccrued, whether liquidated or unliquidated, whether matured or unmatured, whether direct,\n representative, class, or individual in nature, that arise out of or relate in any way to the\n institution, prosecution, or settlement of the claims against Defendants, which Defendants will\n release as against Plaintiffs\u2019 Releasees upon the Effective Date. Released Defendants\u2019 Claims\n shall not include: (1) any claims relating to the enforcement of the Settlement; or (2) any claims\n against any Person or entity who or which submits a request for exclusion from the Settlement\n\n Page 9 of 21\n NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-2 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 11 of 22\n\n\n\n\n Class that is accepted by the Court.\n\n \u201cPlaintiffs\u2019 Releasees\u201d means (i) Lead Plaintiffs, their attorneys, and all other Settlement\n Class Members; (ii) affiliates, current and former parents, subsidiaries, successors,\n predecessors, assigns, executors, administrators, representatives, attorneys, and agents of each\n of the foregoing in (i); and (iii) the current and former officers, directors, Immediate Family\n members, heirs, trusts, trustees, executors, estates, administrators, beneficiaries, agents,\n affiliates, insurers, reinsurers, predecessors, successors, assigns, and advisors of each of the\n persons or entities listed in (i) and (ii), in their capacities as such.\n\n \u201cUnknown Claims\u201d means any Released Plaintiffs\u2019 Claims which any Lead Plaintiff or\n any other Settlement Class Member does not know or suspect to exist in his, her, or its favor at\n the time of the release of such claims, and any Released Defendants\u2019 Claims that any Defendant\n does not know or suspect to exist in his, her, or its favor at the time of the release of such\n claims, which, if known by him, her, or it, might have materially affected his, her, or its\n decision(s) with respect to this Settlement. With respect to any and all Released Claims, the\n Parties stipulate and agree that, upon the Effective Date of the Settlement, Lead Plaintiffs and\n Defendants shall expressly waive, and each of the other Settlement Class Members shall be\n deemed to have waived, and by operation of the Judgment or the Alternate Judgment, if\n applicable, shall have expressly waived, any and all provisions, rights, and benefits conferred by\n any law of any state or territory of the United States, or principle of common law or foreign law,\n which is similar, comparable, or equivalent to California Civil Code \u00a71542, which provides:\n\n A general release does not extend to claims that the creditor or releasing\n party does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of\n executing the release and that, if known by him or her, would have\n materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor or released party.\n\n Lead Plaintiffs, other Settlement Class Members, any of Plaintiffs\u2019 Releasees, Defendants, or\n any of Defendants\u2019 Releasees may hereafter discover facts, legal theories, or authorities in\n addition to or different from those which any of them now knows or believes to be true with\n respect to the subject matter of the Released Claims, but Lead Plaintiffs and Defendants shall\n expressly, fully, finally, and forever waive, compromise, settle, discharge, extinguish, and\n release, and each Settlement Class Member shall be deemed to have waived, compromised,\n settled, discharged, extinguished, and released, and upon the Effective Date and by operation of\n the Judgment or Alternative Judgment shall have waived, compromised, settled, discharged,\n extinguished, and released, fully, finally, and forever, any and all Released Claims, known or\n unknown, suspected or unsuspected, contingent or absolute, accrued or unaccrued, apparent or\n unapparent, which now exist, or heretofore existed, or may hereafter exist, without regard to the\n subsequent discovery or existence of such different or additional facts, legal theories, or\n authorities. Lead Plaintiffs and Defendants acknowledge, and each of the other Settlement\n Class Members shall be deemed by operation of law to have acknowledged, that the foregoing\n waiver was separately bargained for and a material element of the Settlement.\n\n The \u201cEffective Date\u201d will occur when the Court has entered the Preliminary Approval\nOrder; Defendants have not exercised their option to terminate the Settlement pursuant to the\n\n Page 10 of 21\n NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-2 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 12 of 22\n\n\n\n\nprovisions of the Stipulation; Lead Plaintiffs have not exercised their option to terminate the\nSettlement pursuant to the provisions of the Stipulation; the Court has approved the Settlement\ndescribed in the Stipulation, following notice to the Settlement Class and a hearing, as prescribed\nby Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and entered the Judgment; the Settlement\nAmount has been deposited into the Escrow Account in accordance with the provisions of \u00b6 8 of\nthe Stipulation; and the Judgment has become Final, or the Court has entered an Alternate\nJudgment and none of the Parties seek to terminate the Settlement and the Alternate Judgment\nhas become Final..\n\n If you remain a member of the Settlement Class, all of the Court\u2019s orders will apply to\n you and legally bind you. You will be bound by the releases whether or not you submit a Claim\n Form and/or receive a payment under the Settlement.\n\n EXCLUDING YOURSELF FROM THE SETTLEMENT\n\n If you do not want to be eligible to receive a payment from the Settlement, but you want\n to keep any right you may have to sue or continue to sue the Defendants\u2019 Releasees on your\n own, then you must take steps to remove yourself from the Settlement Class. This is called\n excluding yourself or \u201copting out\u201d of the Settlement Class. Please note: If you decide to\n exclude yourself and bring your own claims, Defendants will have the right to seek their\n dismissal, and there is a risk that any lawsuit you file or have already filed to pursue\n claims alleged in the Action may be dismissed.\n\n 12. How do I exclude myself from the Settlement Class?\n\n To exclude yourself from the Settlement Class, you must send an email or signed letter\n by mail stating that you request to be \u201cexcluded from the Settlement Class and do not wish to\n participate in the settlement in Tao Wang and SynWorld Technologies Corp. v. Ampio\n Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-MEH (D. Colo.).\u201d You cannot\n exclude yourself by telephone. To be valid, your submission must state: (A) your name,\n address, telephone number, and signature; (B) the date, number, and dollar amount of all\n purchases or acquisitions of Ampio common stock between December 29, 2020, and August 2,\n 2022, inclusive; and (C) the date, number, and dollar amount of Ampio shares you sold between\n December 29, 2020, and October 31, 2022, inclusive. The submission must also be\n accompanied by verification from your broker (such as copies of trade confirmations,\n account statements, or transaction histories), OR a verified, sworn, or attested-to chart\n including the dates, prices, and quantities at which you purchased and sold Ampio\n common stock during the Class Period, OR other documentation of your transactions in\n Ampio common stock.\n\n Your submission must be received, not simply be postmarked, no later than January 29,\n 2025. You may email your exclusion request to info@AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com or you\n may mail it to:\n Ampio Pharmaceuticals Securities Settlement\n PO Box 25226\n Santa Ana, CA 92799\n\n Page 11 of 21\n NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-2 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 13 of 22\n\n\n\n\n A request for exclusion shall not be valid and effective unless it provides all the\n information called for above and is received within the time stated above, or is otherwise\n accepted by the Court.\n\n If you ask to be excluded, you will not get any payment from the Settlement, and you\n cannot object to the Settlement. You will not be legally bound by anything that happens in this\n lawsuit, and you may be able to sue (or continue to sue) the Defendants and the other\n Defendants\u2019 Releasees in the future.\n\n 13. If I do not exclude myself, can I sue the Defendants and the other Released\n Parties for the same thing later?\n\n\n No. Unless you exclude yourself, you give up any rights to sue the Defendants and the\n other Defendants\u2019 Releasees for any and all Released Claims. If you have a pending lawsuit,\n speak to your lawyer in that case immediately. You must exclude yourself from this Settlement\n Class to continue your own lawsuit. Remember, the exclusion deadline is January 29, 2025.\n\n 14. If I exclude myself, can I get money from the proposed Settlement?\n\n No. If you exclude yourself, you will not get money from the proposed Settlement.\n\n THE LAWYERS REPRESENTING THE CLASS\n\n 15. Do I have a lawyer in this case? How will the lawyers be paid?\n\n The Court has appointed the law firm of Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP as Lead Counsel to\n represent Lead Plaintiffs and all other Settlement Class Members in the Action.\n\n You will not be separately charged for the fees or expenses of Lead Counsel appointed\n by the Court. The Court will determine the amount of Lead Counsel\u2019s fees and expenses, which\n will be paid from the Settlement Fund. See also Notice at 3-4 (\u201cStatement of Attorneys\u2019 Fees\n and Expenses Sought\u201d). If you want to be represented by your own lawyer, you may hire one at\n your own expense.\n\n OBJECTING TO THE SETTLEMENT, THE PLAN OF ALLOCATION, OR THE FEE\n AND EXPENSE APPLICATION\n\n If you are a Settlement Class Member, you can tell the Court that you do not agree with\n the Settlement or some part of it. You can ask the Court to deny approval by filing an\n objection. You can\u2019t ask the Court to order a different settlement; the Court can only approve\n or reject the Settlement. If the Court denies approval, no settlement payments will be sent out\n and the lawsuit will continue. If this is what you want to happen, you must object.\n\n\n\n Page 12 of 21\n NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-2 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 14 of 22\n\n\n\n\n 16. How do I tell the Court that I do not like the proposed Settlement?\n\n If you are a Settlement Class Member, you can object to the Settlement or any of its\n terms, the proposed Plan of Allocation, and/or the Fee and Expense Application, and give\n reasons why you think the Court should not approve it. If the Court denies approval of the\n Settlement, no payments will be made to Settlement Class Members, the Parties will return to\n the position they were in before the Settlement was agreed to, and the Action will continue.\n\n To object, you must send a signed letter stating that you object to the proposed\n Settlement, the proposed Plan of Allocation, and/or the Fee and Expense Application in \u201cTao\n Wang and SynWorld Technologies Corp. v. Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:22-\n cv-02105-WJM-MEH (D. Colo.).\u201d Your objection must state why you are objecting and must\n also: (i) include your name, address, telephone number, and signature; (ii) contain a statement\n of the objection and the specific reasons for it, including any legal and evidentiary support\n (including witnesses) you wish to bring to the Court\u2019s attention; and (iii) documentation\n identifying the number of shares of Ampio common stock you purchased or acquired between\n December 29, 2020 and August 2, 2022, and documentation identifying the number of Ampio\n shares you sold between August 2, 2022, and October 31, 2022, inclusive. Unless otherwise\n ordered by the Court, any Settlement Class Member who does not object in the manner\n described in this Notice will be deemed to have waived any objection and will be forever\n foreclosed from making any objection to the proposed Settlement, Plan of Allocation, and/or\n Lead Counsel\u2019s Fee and Expense Application. Your objection must be filed with the Court at\n the address below, either by mail or in person, and be mailed or delivered to each of the\n following counsel so that it is received, not simply postmarked, no later than January 29, 2025:\n\n Clerk\u2019s Office Plaintiff\u2019s Counsel Defendants\u2019 Counsel\n Clerk of the Court James M. Wilson, Jr. Patrick G. Compton\n United States District Court FARUQI & FARUQI, LLP BALLARD SPAHR, LLP\n District of Colorado 685 Third Ave., 26th Floor 1225 17th St., Suite 2300\n Alfred A. Arraj Courthouse New York, NY 10017 Denver, CO 80202\n 901 19th St.\n Denver, CO 80294\n\n\n 17. What is the difference between objecting and seeking exclusion?\n\n Objecting is telling the Court that you do not like something about the proposed\n Settlement, Plan of Allocation, or Fee and Expense Application. You can still recover money\n from the Settlement. You can object only if you stay in the Settlement Class. Excluding\n yourself is telling the Court that you do not want to be part of the Settlement Class. If you\n exclude yourself, you have no basis to object because the Settlement and the Action no longer\n affect you.\n\n\n\n\n Page 13 of 21\n NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-2 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 15 of 22\n\n\n\n\n THE COURT\u2019S SETTLEMENT HEARING\n\n 18. When and where will the Court decide whether to approve the proposed\n settlement?\n\n\n The Court will hold the Settlement Hearing at 10:30 a.m. on the 19th day of February,\n 2025, at the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, Alfred A. Arraj\n Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, CO 80294, Courtroom A801. At this hearing the Court\n will consider whether: (i) the Settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate, and should receive\n final approval; (ii) the Plan of Allocation is fair and reasonable, and should be approved; (iii)\n the Fee and Expense Application is reasonable and should be approved. The Court will take\n into consideration any written objections filed in accordance with the instructions in Question\n 16 above. We do not know how long it will take the Court to make these decisions.\n\n You should be aware that the Court may change the date and time of the Settlement\n Hearing, or hold the hearing telephonically, without another notice being sent to Settlement\n Class Members. If you want to attend the hearing, you should check with Lead Counsel\n beforehand to be sure that the date and/or time has not changed, or periodically check the\n Settlement website at www.AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com, to see if the Settlement Hearing\n stays as calendared or is changed.\n\n 19. Do I have to come to the Settlement Hearing?\n\n No. Lead Counsel will answer any questions the Court may have. But, you are\n welcome to come at your own expense. If you submit a valid and timely objection, the Court\n will consider it and you do not have to come to the Court to discuss it. You may have your own\n lawyer (at your own expense), but it is not required. If you do hire your own lawyer, he or she\n must file a Notice of Appearance in the manner described in the answer to Question 20 below\n no later than January 29, 2025.\n\n 20. May I speak at the Settlement Hearing?\n\n If you object to the Settlement, you may ask the Court for permission to speak at the\n Settlement Hearing. To do so, you must include with your objection (see Question 16 above) a\n statement stating that it is your \u201cNotice of Intention to Appear in Tao Wang and SynWorld\n Technologies Corp. v. Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-\n MEH (D. Colo.).\u201d Persons who intend to present evidence at the Settlement Hearing must also\n include in their written objections the identities of any witnesses they wish to call to testify and\n any exhibits they intend to introduce into evidence at the Settlement Hearing. Unless otherwise\n ordered by the Court, you cannot speak at the hearing if you excluded yourself from the\n Settlement Class or if you have not provided written notice of your intention to speak at the\n Settlement Hearing by the deadline identified, and in accordance with the procedures described\n in this Question 20 and Question 16.\n\n\n\n Page 14 of 21\n NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-2 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 16 of 22\n\n\n\n\n IF YOU DO NOTHING\n\n 21. What happens if I do nothing at all?\n\n If you do nothing and you are a member of the Settlement Class, you will receive no\n money from this Settlement and you will be precluded from starting a lawsuit, continuing with a\n lawsuit, or being part of any other lawsuit against Defendants and the other Defendants\u2019\n Releasees concerning the Released Claims. To share in the Net Settlement Fund, you must\n submit a Claim Form (see Question 9 above). To start, continue, or be part of any other lawsuit\n against the Defendants and the other Defendants\u2019 Releasees concerning the Released Claims in\n this case, to the extent it is otherwise permissible to do so, you must exclude yourself from this\n Settlement Class (see Question 12 above).\n\n GETTING MORE INFORMATION\n\n 22. Are there more details about the proposed Settlement?\n\n This Notice summarizes the proposed Settlement. For the precise terms and conditions\n of the Settlement, please see the Stipulation available at www.AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com,\n by accessing the Court docket in this case, for a fee, through the Court\u2019s Public Access to Court\n Electronic Records (PACER) system at https://ecf.cod.uscourts.gov, or by visiting the Office of\n the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, Alfred A. Arraj\n Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, CO 80294, between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday\n through Friday, excluding Court holidays as well as the first Thursday of each month from 8:00\n AM to 9:00 AM.\n\n PLEASE DO NOT TELEPHONE THE COURT OR THE COURT CLERK\u2019S OFFICE TO\n INQUIRE ABOUT THIS SETTLEMENT OR THE CLAIM PROCESS.\n\n You can also get a copy of the Stipulation, and other documents related to the\n Settlement, as well as additional information about the Settlement by visiting the website\n dedicated to the Settlement, www.AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com; writing to the Claims\n Administrator at info@AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com; or by calling the Claims Administrator\n toll free at 1-833-602-5027.\n\n\n\n\n Page 15 of 21\n NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-2 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 17 of 22\n\n\n\n\n PLAN OF ALLOCATION OF NET SETTLEMENT FUND AMONG CLASS MEMBERS\n\n The Plan of Allocation is a matter separate and apart from the proposed Settlement, and\nany decision by the Court concerning the Plan of Allocation shall not affect the validity or finality\nof the proposed Settlement. The Court may approve the Plan of Allocation with or without\nmodifications agreed to among the Parties, or may approve another plan of allocation, without\nfurther notice to Settlement Class Members.\n\n The objective of the Plan of Allocation is to equitably distribute the Net Settlement Fund\namong Authorized Claimants based on their respective alleged economic losses as a result of the\nalleged fraud, as opposed to losses caused by market- or industry-wide factors, or Company-\nspecific factors unrelated to the alleged fraud. The Claims Administrator shall determine each\nAuthorized Claimant\u2019s share of the Net Settlement Fund based upon the recognized loss formula\n(the \u201cRecognized Loss\u201d) described below. A Recognized Loss will be calculated for each share of\nAmpio Common Stock purchased or otherwise acquired during the Class Period. The calculation\nof Recognized Loss will depend upon several factors, including when the shares of Ampio\nCommon Stock were purchased during the Class Period, and for what amounts, and whether such\nshares were sold, and if sold, when they were sold, and for what amounts. The Recognized Loss\nis not intended to estimate the amount a Settlement Class Member might have been able to recover\nafter a trial, nor to estimate the amount that will be paid to Authorized Claimants pursuant to the\nSettlement. The Recognized Loss is the basis upon which the Net Settlement Fund will be\nproportionately allocated to the Authorized Claimants. The Claims Administrator will use its best\nefforts to administer and distribute the Net Settlement Fund to the extent that it is equitably and\neconomically feasible.\n\n The Plan of Allocation was created with the assistance of a consulting damages expert, and\nreflects the assumption that the price of Ampio Common Stock was artificially inflated throughout\nthe Settlement Class Period.4 The estimated alleged artificial inflation in the price of Ampio\nCommon Stock during the Settlement Class Period is reflected in Table 1 below. The computation\nof the estimated alleged artificial inflation in the price of Ampio Common Stock during the\nSettlement Class Period is based on certain misrepresentations alleged by Plaintiffs and the price\nchange in the stock, net of market- and industry-wide factors, in reaction to the public\nannouncements that allegedly corrected the misrepresentations alleged by Plaintiffs.\n\n Federal securities laws allow investors to recover for losses caused by disclosures which\ncorrected the defendants\u2019 previous misleading statements or omissions. Thus, in order to have\nbeen damaged by the alleged violations of the federal securities laws, Ampio Common Stock\npurchased or otherwise acquired during the Class Period must have been held during a period of\ntime in which its price declined due to the disclosure of information which corrected an allegedly\nmisleading statement or omission. Plaintiffs and Lead Counsel have determined that such price\ndeclines occurred on April 21, 2022, May 17, 2022, May 18, 2022, and August 3, 2022 (the\n\n4\n During the Settlement Class Period, Ampio Common Stock was listed on the New York\nStock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol \u201cAMPE.\u201d After the Settlement Class Period, Ampio\nCommon Stock underwent two reverse stock splits: a 15-to-1 reverse stock split on November\n10, 2022; and 20-to-1 reverse stock split on September 12, 2023. Herein, Ampio stock prices\nand quantities are not split-adjusted.\n Page 16 of 21\n NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-2 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 18 of 22\n\n\n\n\n\u201cCorrective Disclosure Dates\u201d). Accordingly, if a share of Ampio Common Stock was sold before\nApril 21, 2022 (the earliest Corrective Disclosure Date), the Recognized Loss for that share is\n$0.00, and any loss suffered is not compensable under the federal securities laws. Likewise, if a\nshare of Ampio Common Stock was both purchased and sold between two consecutive Corrective\nDisclosure Dates, the Recognized Loss for that share is $0.00.\n\n Table 1\n\n Artificial Inflation in Ampio Common Stock\n\n From To Per-Share Price Inflation\n\n December 29, 2020 April 20, 2022 $0.16\n\n April 21, 2022 May 16, 2022 $0.08\n\n May 17, 2022 May 17, 2022 $0.07\n\n May 18, 2022 August 2, 2022 $0.06\n\n August 3, 2022 Thereafter $0.00\n\n\n The \u201c90-day look back\u201d provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995\n(\u201cPSLRA\u201d) is incorporated into the calculation of the Recognized Loss. The limitations on the\ncalculation of the Recognized Loss imposed by the PSLRA are applied such that losses on Ampio\nCommon Stock purchased during the Class Period and held as of the close of the 90-day period\nsubsequent to the Class Period (the \u201c90-Day Lookback Period\u201d) cannot exceed the difference\nbetween the purchase price paid for such stock and the average price of Ampio Common Stock\nduring the 90-Day Lookback Period. The Recognized Loss on Ampio Common Stock purchased\nduring the Class Period and sold during the 90-Day Lookback Period cannot exceed the difference\nbetween the purchase price paid for such stock and the rolling average price of Ampio Common\nStock during the portion of the 90-Day Lookback Period elapsed as of the date of sale.\n\n In the calculations below, all purchase and sale prices shall exclude any fees, taxes and\ncommissions. If a Recognized Loss amount is calculated to be a negative number, that Recognized\nLoss shall be set to zero ($0.00). Any transactions in Ampio Common Stock executed outside of\nregular trading hours for the U.S. financial markets shall be deemed to have occurred during the\nnext regular trading session.\n\n Calculation of Recognized Loss Per Share of Ampio Common Stock\n\n For each share of Ampio Common Stock purchased or otherwise acquired during the\nSettlement Class Period (i.e., December 29, 2020 through August 2, 2022, both dates inclusive),\nthe Recognized Loss per share shall be calculated as follows:\n\n (i) For each share of Ampio Common Stock that was sold prior to April 21, 2022, the\n Recognized Loss per share is $0.\n\n\n Page 17 of 21\n NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-2 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 19 of 22\n\n\n\n\n (ii) For each share of Ampio Common Stock purchased during the Settlement Class\n Period that was subsequently sold during the period April 21, 2022 through August\n 2, 2022, both dates inclusive, the Recognized Loss per share is: the amount of per-\n share price inflation on the date of purchase as appears in Table 1 above minus the\n amount of per-share price inflation on the date of sale as appears in Table 1.\n\n (iii) For each share of Ampio Common Stock purchased during the Settlement Class\n Period that was subsequently sold during the period August 3, 2022 through\n October 31, 2022, both dates inclusive (i.e., sold during the 90-Day Lookback\n Period), the Recognized Loss per share is the lesser of:\n a. the amount of per-share price inflation on the date of purchase as appears in\n Table 1 above; or\n\n b. the purchase price minus the \u201c90-Day Lookback Value\u201d on the date of sale\n provided in Table 2 below.\n\n (iv) For each share of Ampio Common Stock purchased during the Settlement Class\n Period and still held as of the close of trading on October 31, 2022, the Recognized\n Loss per share is the lesser of:\n a. the amount of per-share price inflation on the date of purchase as appears in\n Table 1 above; or\n\n b. the purchase price minus the average closing price of Ampio Common Stock\n during the 90-Day Lookback Period, which is $0.07.\n\n\n TABLE 2\n Sale/ 90-Day Sale/ 90-Day Sale/ 90-Day\n Disposition Lookback Disposition Lookback Disposition Lookback\n Date Value Date Value Date Value\n 8/3/2022 $0.10 9/1/2022 $0.10 10/3/2022 $0.09\n 8/4/2022 $0.11 9/2/2022 $0.10 10/4/2022 $0.09\n 8/5/2022 $0.11 9/6/2022 $0.10 10/5/2022 $0.09\n 8/8/2022 $0.11 9/7/2022 $0.10 10/6/2022 $0.09\n 8/9/2022 $0.11 9/8/2022 $0.10 10/7/2022 $0.08\n 8/10/2022 $0.11 9/9/2022 $0.10 10/10/2022 $0.08\n 8/11/2022 $0.11 9/12/2022 $0.10 10/11/2022 $0.08\n 8/12/2022 $0.10 9/13/2022 $0.10 10/12/2022 $0.08\n 8/15/2022 $0.11 9/14/2022 $0.10 10/13/2022 $0.08\n 8/16/2022 $0.10 9/15/2022 $0.10 10/14/2022 $0.08\n 8/17/2022 $0.10 9/16/2022 $0.10 10/17/2022 $0.08\n 8/18/2022 $0.10 9/19/2022 $0.10 10/18/2022 $0.08\n 8/19/2022 $0.10 9/20/2022 $0.10 10/19/2022 $0.08\n 8/22/2022 $0.10 9/21/2022 $0.10 10/20/2022 $0.08\n 8/23/2022 $0.10 9/22/2022 $0.10 10/21/2022 $0.08\n 8/24/2022 $0.10 9/23/2022 $0.10 10/24/2022 $0.07\n 8/25/2022 $0.10 9/26/2022 $0.09 10/25/2022 $0.07\n Page 18 of 21\n NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-2 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 20 of 22\n\n\n\n\n 8/26/2022 $0.10 9/27/2022 $0.09 10/26/2022 $0.07\n 8/29/2022 $0.10 9/28/2022 $0.09 10/27/2022 $0.07\n 8/30/2022 $0.10 9/29/2022 $0.09 10/28/2022 $0.07\n 8/31/2022 $0.10 9/30/2022 $0.09 10/31/2022 $0.07\n INSTRUCTIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL CLAIMANTS\n\n The payment you receive will reflect your proportionate share of the Net Settlement Fund.\nSuch payment will depend on the number of Ampio shares that participate in the Settlement, and\nwhen those shares were purchased and sold. The number of claimants who send in claims varies\nwidely from case to case.\n\n A purchase or sale of Ampio Common Stock shall be deemed to have occurred on the\n\u201ccontract\u201d or \u201ctrade\u201d date as opposed to the \u201csettlement\u201d or \u201cpayment\u201d date.\n\n Acquisition by Gift, Inheritance, or Operation of Law: If a Settlement Class Member\nacquired Ampio Common Stock during the Class Period by way of gift, inheritance or operation\nof law, such a claim will be computed by using the date and price of the original purchase and not\nthe date and price of transfer. To the extent that Ampio Common Stock were originally purchased\nprior to commencement of the Settlement Class Period, the Recognized Loss for that acquisition\nshall be deemed to be zero ($0.00).\n\n The first-in-first-out (\u201cFIFO\u201d) basis will be applied to purchases and sales. Sales will be\nmatched in chronological order, by trade date, first against Ampio Common Stock held as of the\nclose of trading on December 28, 2020 (the last day before the Class Period begins) and then\nagainst the purchases of Ampio Common Stock during the Class Period beginning with the earliest\npurchase during the Settlement Class Period.\n\n The date of covering a \u201cshort sale\u201d is deemed to be the date of purchase of shares. The date\nof a \u201cshort sale\u201d is deemed to be the date of sale of shares. In accordance with the Plan of\nAllocation, however, the Recognized Loss on \u201cshort sales\u201d is zero. In the event that a claimant has\nan opening short position in Ampio Common Stock, the earliest Settlement Class Period purchases\nshall be matched against such opening short position and not be entitled to a recovery until that\nshort position is fully covered.\n\n Option contracts are not securities eligible to participate in the Settlement. With respect to\nAmpio Common Stock purchased or sold through the exercise of an option, the purchase/sale date\nof the stock shall be the exercise date of the option and the purchase/sale price of the stock shall\nbe the closing price of Ampio Common Stock on the date of exercise. Any Recognized Loss\narising from purchases of Ampio Common Stock acquired during the Class Period through the\nexercise of an option on Ampio Common Stock5 shall be computed as provided for other purchases\nof Ampio Common Stock in the Plan of Allocation.\n\n\n\n5\n Including (1) purchases of Ampio Common Stock as the result of the exercise of a call option,\nand (2) purchases of Ampio Common Stock by the seller of a put option as a result of the buyer\nof such put option exercising that put option.\n Page 19 of 21\n NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-2 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 21 of 22\n\n\n\n\n Payment according to the Plan of Allocation will be deemed conclusive against all\nAuthorized Claimants. A Recognized Loss will be calculated as defined herein and cannot be less\nthan zero. The Claims Administrator shall allocate to each Authorized Claimant a pro rata share\nof the Net Settlement Fund based on his, her, or its total Recognized Loss as compared to the total\nRecognized Losses of all Authorized Claimants. No distribution will be made to Authorized\nClaimants who would otherwise receive a distribution of less than $10.00.\n\n Settlement Class Members who do not submit an acceptable Claim Form will not share in\nthe Settlement proceeds. The Settlement and the Final Order and Judgment dismissing this Action\nwith prejudice will nevertheless bind Settlement Class Members who do not submit a request for\nexclusion and/or submit a Claim Form.\n\n Please contact the Claims Administrator if you disagree with any determinations made by\nthe Claims Administrator regarding your Proof of Claim. If you are unsatisfied with the\ndeterminations, you may ask the Court, which retains jurisdiction over all Settlement Class\nMembers and the claims-administration process, to decide the issue by submitting a written\nrequest.\n\n The Defendants, their respective counsel, and all other Released Parties will have no\nresponsibility or liability whatsoever for the processing of Claim Forms, the investment of the\nSettlement Fund, the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, the Plan of Allocation, or the\npayment of any claim. Plaintiff and Lead Counsel, likewise, will have no liability for their\nreasonable efforts to execute, administer, and distribute the Settlement.\n\n Distributions will be made to Authorized Claimants after all claims have been processed\nand after the Court has granted final approval of the Settlement. If any funds remain in the Net\nSettlement Fund by reason of uncashed distribution checks or otherwise, then, after the Claims\nAdministrator has made reasonable and diligent efforts to have Settlement Class Members who\nare entitled to participate in the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund cash their distributions,\nany balance remaining in the Net Settlement Fund after at least six (6) months after the initial\ndistribution of such funds will be used in the following fashion: (a) first, to pay any amounts\nmistakenly omitted from the initial disbursement; (b) second, to pay any additional settlement\nadministration fees, costs, and expenses, including those of Lead Counsel or the Claims\nAdministrator as may be approved by the Court; and (c) finally, to make a second distribution to\nclaimants who cashed their checks from the initial distribution and who would receive at least\n$10.00, after payment of the estimated costs, expenses, or fees to be incurred in administering the\nNet Settlement Fund and in making this second distribution, if such second distribution is\neconomically feasible. These redistributions shall be repeated, if economically feasible, until the\nbalance remaining in the Net Settlement Fund is de minimis and such remaining balance will then\nbe distributed to Investor Protection Trust, a nationwide non-profit organization dedicated to\nproviding investor education and advocacy, or to another non-sectarian, not-for-profit organization\nserving the public interest designated and approved by the Court.\n\n\n\n SPECIAL NOTICE TO SECURITIES BROKERS AND OTHER NOMINEES\n\n\n Page 20 of 21\n NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-2 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 22 of 22\n\n\n\n\n If you purchased Ampio common stock between December 29, 2020, and August 2, 2022,\n for the beneficial interest of a person or organization other than yourself, the Court has directed\n that WITHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS OF YOUR RECEIPT OF THE POSTCARD\n NOTICE, YOU MUST EITHER: (a) request from the Claims Administrator sufficient copies of\n the Postcard Notice to forward to all such beneficial owners and WITHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR\n DAYS after receipt thereof forward them to all such beneficial owners; or (b) WITHIN TEN (10)\n CALENDAR DAYS of receipt of the Postcard Notice, provide a list of the names, addresses, and\n email addresses (to the extent known) to the Claims Administrator. You are entitled to\n reimbursement from the Settlement Fund of your reasonable expenses actually incurred in\n connection with the foregoing, including reimbursement of postage expense and the cost of\n ascertaining the names and addresses of beneficial owners. Those expenses will be paid upon\n request and submission of appropriate supporting documentation. All communications\n concerning the foregoing should be addressed to the Claims Administrator:\n\n Ampio Pharmaceuticals Securities Settlement\n P.O. Box 25226\n Santa Ana, CA 92799\n\n\n Dated: October 15, 2024\n\n\n\n\n Page 21 of 21\n NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT\n\f","ocr_status":1,"date_upload":"2026-06-24T12:58:17.236958-07:00","document_number":"99","attachment_number":2,"pacer_doc_id":"039011687850","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":2,"description":"Exhibit B - Long Form Notice","acms_document_guid":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/483906410/","id":483906410,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/64904094/99/3/wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc/","date_created":"2026-06-24T12:57:40.830921-07:00","date_modified":"2026-06-24T12:58:17.242652-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":10,"file_size":1142949,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"99","attachment_number":3,"pacer_doc_id":"039011687851","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":2,"description":"Exhibit C - Claim Form","acms_document_guid":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/483906411/","id":483906411,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/64904094/99/4/wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc/","date_created":"2026-06-24T12:57:40.846508-07:00","date_modified":"2026-06-25T05:20:30.112277-07:00","sha1":"f510be8ddb57d33957ed3e771c2e0268f7a45feb","page_count":4,"file_size":281039,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.99.4.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.99.4.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-4 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 1 of 4\n\n\n\n\n EXHIBIT D\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-4 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 2 of 4\n\n\n\n\n Date: October 15, 2024\n\n\n\n\nRe: Wang et al v. Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al.\n Case Number: 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-MEH\n Court: United States District Court for the District of Colorado\n Notice of Proposed Settlement\n\nIf you purchased Ampio common stock between December 29, 2020, and August 2, 2022, for the beneficial\ninterest of a person or organization other than yourself, the Court has directed that WITHIN TEN (10)\nCALENDAR DAYS OF YOUR RECEIPT OF THIS NOTICE, YOU MUST EITHER: (a) request from the\nClaims Administrator sufficient copies of the Postcard Notice to forward to all such beneficial owners and\nWITHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS after receipt thereof forward them to all such beneficial owners; or (b)\nWITHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS of receipt of this notice, provide a list of the names, addresses, and\nemail addresses (to the extent known) to the Claims Administrator.\n\nIf you are providing a list of names, emails, and addresses to the Claims Administrator:\n\n a. Compile a list of names and addresses of the Beneficial Owners that purchased or acquired Ampio common stock\n between December 29, 2020, and August 2, 2022 (inclusive).\n b. Prepare the list in Microsoft Excel Format. A preformatted spreadsheet can be requested via email or on the\n Settlement Website (www.AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com/Nominees).\n c. Then you must do one of the following:\n a. Upload the spreadsheet to the Settlement Website or\n b. Email the spreadsheet to broker@AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com.\n\nIf you are mailing the Postcard Notice to beneficial owners:\n\nRequest the needed number of copies of the Postcard Notice by filling out a mailing request form on the\nSettlement Website (www.AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com/Nominees). You must mail the Postcard Notice to\nthe beneficial owners within ten (10) calendar days of your receipt of the Postcard Notice.\n\nIf you have any questions, contact the Claims Administrator at broker@AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com.\n\nIf you are filing electronic claims:\n\nA nominee may also submit a Proof of Claim Form on behalf of multiple clients who are beneficial owners by\nusing the Settlement Website (www.AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com/Nominees).\n\nRegards,\nAnne-Marie Marra\nProgram Manager, Client Services\n\n\n\n 3194-C Airport Loop Drive, Costa Mesa, CA 92626\n www.simpluris.com | 1 (800) 779 - 2104\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-4 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 3 of 4\n\n\nAmpio Pharmaceuticals Securities Settlement\nP.O. Box 25226\nSanta Ana, CA 92799\n\nCOURT-ORDERED LEGAL NOTICE\n\nImportant Notice about a Securities Class\nAction Settlement.\n\nYou may be entitled to a CASH payment.\nThis Notice may affect your legal rights.\nPlease read it carefully.\n\nTao Wang and Synworld Techs., Corp. v. Ampio\nPharmaceuticals., Inc., et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-\n02105-WJM-MEH\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-4 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 4 of 4\n\n THIS CARD PROVIDES ONLY LIMITED INFORMATION ABOUT THE SETTLEMENT. PLEASE VISIT\n WWW.AMPIOSECURITIESSETTLEMENT.COM FOR MORE INFORMATION.\n\nThere has been a proposed Settlement of claims against Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (\u201cAmpio\u201d), and certain current and former executives of Ampio\n(collectively, the \u201cDefendants\u201d). The Settlement resolves a lawsuit in which Lead Plaintiffs allege that Defendants disseminated materially false and\nmisleading information to the investing public related to Ampio\u2019s commercial drug candidate, Ampion\u00ae, in violation of the federal securities laws.\nDefendants deny any and all allegations of wrongdoing whatsoever. You received this Postcard Notice because you or someone in your family may have\npurchased or otherwise acquired Ampio common stock between December 29, 2020, and August 2, 2022, inclusive, and been damaged thereby.\n\nDefendants have agreed to cause Ampio to pay a Settlement Amount of $3,000,000.00. The Settlement provides that the Settlement Fund, after deduction of\nany Court-approved attorneys\u2019 fees and expenses, notice and administration costs, and taxes, is to be divided among all Settlement Class Members who submit\na valid Claim Form, in exchange for the settlement of this case and the releases by Settlement Class Members of claims related to this case. For all details of\nthe Settlement, read the Stipulation and full Notice, available at www.AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com. Your share of the Settlement proceeds will depend on\nthe number of valid Claims submitted, and the number, size, and timing of your transactions in Ampio common stock. If every eligible Settlement Class\nMember submits a valid Claim Form, the average recovery will be $0.02 per damaged share of Ampio common stock before expenses and other Court-ordered\ndeductions. Your award will be determined pro rata based on the number of claims submitted. This is further explained in the detailed Notice found on the\nSettlement website.\n\nTo qualify for payment, you must submit a Claim Form. The Claim Form can be found on the website www.AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com, or will be\nmailed to you upon request to the Claims Administrator (1-833-602-5027). Claim Forms must be emailed or postmarked by January 13, 2025. If you do not\nwant to be legally bound by the Settlement, you must exclude yourself by January 29, 2025, or you will not be able to sue the Defendants about the legal\nclaims in this case. If you exclude yourself, you cannot get money from this Settlement. If you want to object to the Settlement, you may file an objection by\nJanuary 29, 2025. The detailed Notice explains how to submit a Claim Form, exclude yourself, or object.\n\nThe Court will hold a hearing in this case on February 19, 2025 at 10:30 a.m. to consider whether to approve the Settlement and a request by the lawyers\nrepresenting the Settlement Class for up to 28% of the Settlement Fund in attorneys\u2019 fees, plus actual expenses up to $75,000 for litigating the case and\nnegotiating the Settlement, and reimbursement of Lead Plaintiffs\u2019 costs and expenses related to their representation of the Settlement Class in an aggregate\namount not to exceed $5,000. You may attend the hearing and ask to be heard by the Court, but you do not have to. For more information, call toll-free 1-833-\n602-5027 or visit the website www.AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com and read the detailed Notice.\n\f","ocr_status":1,"date_upload":"2026-06-24T12:58:59.423727-07:00","document_number":"99","attachment_number":4,"pacer_doc_id":"039011687852","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":2,"description":"Exhibit D - Nominee Notice Packet","acms_document_guid":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/483906418/","id":483906418,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/64904094/99/5/wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc/","date_created":"2026-06-24T12:57:43.591530-07:00","date_modified":"2026-06-25T05:16:43.095615-07:00","sha1":"fc906187c0fa0c82c19d5145e55fde04263663d8","page_count":2,"file_size":1039045,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.99.5.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.99.5.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-5 _ filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\npg 1 of 2\n\nEXHIBIT E\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-5\n\nAl 6 WEEK OF OCTOBER 28, 2024\n\npg 2 of 2\n\nfiled 12/23/24\n\nIBD SECTOR LEADERS\n\nUSDC Colorado\n\nINVESTORS.COM\n\nIBD Sector Leaders\n\nS&P 500\n\n1,410%\n\nPerformance since 3/6/2009\n\nAtour Lifestyle (atari YTD +50%\n6] M Shares 98 Comp. Rating 99 EPS ARS\n\nChinese-based Co operates as franchised hotel operator with 920 Atour\n\n$25.97\nAde ROE\n\nMercadoLibre (mei)\n46.1 M Shares\n\nAnn. EPS Growth +97%\n\nPE24 Avg. Daily Vol 1,988,700. Debt 0%\n\n99 Comp. Rating 99 EPS\nProvides digital and technology tools that allow businesses and\nindividuals to trade products and services.\n\nYTD +30% Nvidia (Nvoal\n\n91 RS\n\n$2,047.35\n0% ROE\n\nAnn. EPS Growth +193% = PE?4 Avg. Daily Vol 268, 900 Debt 72%\n\nann, EPS Growth +74%\n\n2303.5 M Shares 99 Comp. Rating 99 EPS\nDesigns graphic processing units used in personal computers, worksta-\ntions, game consoles and mobile devices.\n\nYTD +186%\n98 RS\n\n$141.54\n99% ROE\n\nPalantir (putR)\n2013.8 M Shares\nDevelops software for institutions to protect individual privacy and\nprevent the misuse of information.\n\nYTD +161%\n% Comp. Rating 97EPS 98RS\n\n$44.86\n19% ROE\n\nPE G4 Avg. Daily Vol 299,219, 600 Debt 20%\n\nAnn. EPS Growth +33%\n\nPE 140. Avg. Daily Vol 59,709,200 Debt 0%\n\nLast Otr EPS +31%4 Next Otr Eps Est +822%7 Last Otr Sales +64% Last QtrEPS+103%t Next QtrEps Est 48% Last OtrSales+42% Last OtrEPS +1524 Next OtrEps Est+158%! Last OtrSales+122% Last OtrEPS 80%? Next OtrEps Est +29% Last (tr Sales +27%\nSOtrs Avg Eps+78% Pretax Mgn 25% hs 30trs Avg Eps +88% \u2014 PreTax Mgn 11% JOtrs Avg Eps +362% Pretax Mgn 62% se gas SOtrs Avg Eps +80% \u2014 PreTax Mgn iM\nwf \u201clps: 2080 mos Legion rt Po\nEPS Due 34 ere WW? ot Lk lag EPS nt \u201c10/81 prong v : ae ! A tae EPS Due: ve aay bo es a \u00e9 mie n 55 \u00abEPS Due: i bregp 4\n\"93 TH [ei gees: \u2014 Ts Ly\nis 19 : ; any ML \"in ft At Acc/Dis Co i \u2018cli D Bg r AC\naM VOl 2.3 47 ort i wean otown Vol tt aon \u2018UpDown Voi7.3 58 f \u201cUpDown Vol 2.4 7\n1-5 eo = 4300 : 1 Sup/Demarid 7948 Souenest O14\n: 1200 i fp 40 i\nAPR loct APR \u2018OCT\n\nJAN 24 \u2018apa\n\n|\nPast 25% att past 19. 80 any hold 8 ee\n\nHAT ATTTUTTVT.\nAbove 5% buy zone, | OL 05 entry; 10- peeked\n\ni908 131 0 entry, veiralk time high.\n\n\u2018JUL\n. 30000\n\n1\nWell past 25% re ue 77.50 entry.\n\nServiceNow (now!\n703.9 M Shares\n\nYTD +35%\n98 Comp. Rating 99 EPS 89 RS\n\nDevelops cloud-based IT software for workflow automation, data\n\nconsolidation, business administration.\n\nAnn. EPS Growth +36% = PET) Avg Daily Vol 1,157,200 Debt 20% Ann. EPS Growth+145% PESO Avg. Daily Vol 1,074,600 Debt 268%\n\nLast Otr EPS +27%4 Next OtrEps Est +17%1 Last OtrSales+22% Last QtrEPS +30%T Next QtrEpsEst+29%? Last Qtr Sales +30%\n\n3Otrs Avg Eps+34% Pretax Magn 30% 3Oirs Avg Eps +33% Pretax Mgn 10%\n\nEPS Due: belie bp 4tttoz0 Rome bays \u2018 wit tre a\n-AoofDis B- 740 es\n\ni wy \u00e9 nb\n\n_Appoi val 128 ore\n\nShiftd (Four)\n63.9 M Shares\n\n$950.85\n35% ROE\n\nthe United States.\n\n98 Comp. Rating 96 EPS\nProvides integrated payment processing and technology solutions in\n\nYTD +26%\n95 RS\n\n$93.90\n9% ROE\n\n~ hoofs A 88\nDown Vel 1453\n\n-Sup/demand-79 47\n\u2018OCT\n\npie - \u201cue\n\nhitctatiactin nit he\nExtended from i buy zone of 850.33 entry.\n\n'APR\n\nwan 24\n\nil t\n\nJUL\n\nExtended fon on with handle with 8 6d entry. 202:\n\n7500\n\nTill osoo\n\nMARKETSURGE\n\nSTAY IN STEP\n\nWITH THE MARKET\n\nMarketSurge\u2019s monthly Stay in\nStep with the Market webinar\nis a must-watch for timely\nmarket analysis and time-\n\ntested investing strategies.\n\nNIV\n\nSave your spot for the\nupcoming webinar at:\n\ninvestors.com/MSwebinars\n\nIBD SECTOR LEADERS\n\nAl Champ Nvidia Is Still Winning\n\nBY RACHEL FOX\nINVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY\n\nNvidia (NVDA) has been on quite the\nbull run these past few weeks with\nits fifth straight up week conclud-\ning Friday. The leading artificial\nintelligence chipmaker has anum-\nber of bullish qualities, including\nanideal 99 Composite Ratinganda\n\n98 Relative Strength Rating.\n\nWith shares trading inside the 5%\nbuy zone from a 140.76 buy point,\nNvidia stock is actionable now.\n\nThe data-center market has been\na highlight in third-quarter semi-\nconductor earnings reports. With\nhyperscale cloud-computing play-\ners like Alphabet (GOoGL), Ama-\nzon (AMZN), Meta Platforms (META)\n\nand Microsoft (MSFT) continuing to\nspend heavily on data center gear,\nAl chipmakers like Nvidia, Broad-\ncom (AVGO), Marvell Technology\n(MRVL) and Advanced Micro Devices\n(AMD) stand to benefit.\n\nAside from recent analyst up-\ngrades boding well for Nvidia,\nTesla (TSLA) announced that it in-\ncreased AI training by more than\n75% year over year in Q3. The elec-\ntric-vehicle giant gets its chips\nfrom Nvidia and is investing in AI\nto train its driver-assistance fea-\nture and humanoid robots.\n\nNvidia is both extended from its\n50-day moving average and from\nan alternative entry at 131.26. But\nthe stock initially broke out from\nthe traditional 140.76 buy point on\nOct. 17, before retreating from that\nentry. Shares once again moved\nabove the entry on Oct. 21,\n\nDespite some intraweek volatility\nthat saw Nvidia undercut the cur-\nrent 140.76 entry, shares quickly\nretook the entry and were trading\ninside the 5% buy zone.\n\nShares have been trading above\nthe 10-day moving average for the\n\npast few weeks. Volume has dried\nup in the stock in recent weeks\ncompared with a few weeks ago.\n\nOn the positive side, the stock\u2019s\nrelative strength line is etching\nnear highs alongside the stock\u2019s\nprice. Shares notched a high of\n144,42 on Oct, 22, before pulling\nback. The stock is now trading\naround 142,\n\nLess than ideal is the Accumula-\ntion/Distribution Rating of D for\nNvidia stock. This rating measures\ninstitutional buying and selling in\nastock over the past three months.\n\nT. R k d L . \u2018 Smee Camp hating siecle compete Fang _Smatselect? Compost Rating\nop-nRanke ow-Priced S ocks [5 Rhee SDK Closing Volt [3 B Acc S2-Wk Vol% lt R ee $2-\u00a5k Vol%\nP |S | S1Dis | Hi | Stock Symbol | Price [hg | \u00a2 | \u00a5 1S | S/Dis| Hi [Stock Symba P| Ch | | wf S |S )pis| Hi | Stock Syntace jchg |\nIncludes stocks trading less than 20,000 shares. Fulllist of low-priced | 75 \u00a27 3.0 285 srixmorProp = BRX 2747-041 -19 | 90 4 99 Ae 83 Conus CRVS 831 063 193 | 88 8 B2 B+ 181 Mode MOV 1776-016 -11\nand thinly traded stocks at https://www.investors.com/ibd-data-tables/ | 7 63 90. C 80 BroadwyFnel \u2014-BYFC_ 6.59 -0.01 84 ] 84 51 91 A 320 CousinsProps CUR 31.54 0.17 60 | 88 93 84 D 2050 Moogd MOGB 191,02-1498 -25\n86 81 9A 67 Broogetnig BROS \u00ab1.87 O17 -19 | 7 22 91 A 10.7 Coyathera COVA. 896 095 261 n 9 98 B i Myth Mite a 068 a\nPercy Fr Aad TRS? AeETA ARMIN B ORR ae PRT SCL A ORT LRTA OEE GLE ER SIG RP PATER FE POEWES RTT TRS OT EASTER apnecee Teer er eahe ne PART RA REeA RAT ASRESRTA TREMP OT URECIS PRAT 94 it oH Ae iT Bratt WithSals BNT 53.40 074 -d6 a? 69 9 B- ie CreatvRealiti CREX 470 O23 -40) Qh i + 6 L] Nathnsl ms ATH 4g a -]\nSaree Composite Rating nna Cones Rang 7] M498 Be 22 ButterfiyNeth BFLY 1.82 0.06 -25 | 97 95 96 B+ 7.6 Crexendo CXDO 61-021 30 | 83 68 % A 7.8 NatCinmdia = NCML 7.11 005-19\nPR Ace S2-Wk Closing Vol | | PR Ace 82-Wk Vals | 78 62 % B 119 C8 coce | 689-006 -71 | 79 7 72 C+ 55.1 CubeSmart CUBE 4825 -083 -28 | 82 BI 78.B 10.3 NallEnrgSveRe NESR 986 O17 402\n|$ | S/Bis| Hi | Stock Symbol | Price |Chg | \u00a2 | \u00a5 |S |S/0is| Ki | Stock symbol | Pe | Chg 40 65 79 8-121) CamdenPrnty \u00abCPT 118.29 -2006 52 | 87 55 99 Ay 30 CuriositystemA \u00a9 CURI 262 0.02 -16 | 76 59 83 D- B61 Natikthiny NHL 76.17 -068 38\n1 76 %B 21 Cangoa CANG 222 033 699 | 95 82 89 .B 5125 Dailyirnal DCD 431,60 -5.40 -1 | 81 67 67 B 486 NatiRetallPtly \u00a9 NNN 4558-105 -18\n67 41 93 A. 92 AlRenew RERE 258 00) -83 n e : \u00e9 yi os a a oe # 42 75 10 Bs 68 Cptlfed CFN 681-019 6 | 98 70 99 A- 58 Dallasnews DAIN 516-059 18 | 76 68 76 B 494 NaliStrgaff NSA 4285 049-45\nBY 49 99 As 5.2 AddSmartTech AL 5.38 (AT 264 Eee oy TNO <1! 9 86 BEB BLS Carelrust CTRE 9093 -001 -22 | 77 79 90 A: M4 BenaliCapitald DECA 1188 0.37 189 | 95 9 92 C- 9.7 NatWest\u00e9r NING 9.49 0083?\nB59 87 A. 36 AcastiPhem = ACST 3.37 003-15 | 79 68 70 B- 99.5 Atlanticus ATL $644 \u201c0.42 55) oc ae gy ge 295 CBFinISves CBFV 2850-039 -a5 | 82 46 97 A- 69 Designthera OSON 544 009 74 | 76 37 7B B- 310 Nayax WYAK 2647 001-82\n5 70 65 Ae 485 ACNE ACNB 4200-088 -b\u00a7 / 79 21 98 A+ 35 AlyrPharma = ATVR 3.25 O01 63 | o> oy oy b. 78 CenterraGold CGAY 7.25 -025 -a5 | 77 37 95 B+ 50 DiamedicaThera DMAC 439 005 -25 | 78 43 96 B+ 19 NektTh NKTR 132-0032\n16 47 76.8 83. ADT Inc ADT 788-026 21g [8 7 MB DT Aurinia AUPH 7105 01-39 | or os a9 8 481 CentPlnsBneshr CPI 1260 -0.15 95 | 76 59 88 8-166 DigitalRity DLR 181.01 1588 289 | 90 31 89 A 33 NetSolfch -NTWK 315 000-88\nBT 81 74\u00b0C. 0 AGMortgage =\u00bb MITT. \u00ab726 0.11 -3 | %2 60 99 A. 9.8 AutoraMoblA Gee tt Tag m7 aC. 44 Ceragon cant 247 do 24 | 87 86 82 B. 42 Dynagas DING 387-001 88 | 78 71 BG C+ 4B4 NexPointRes XRT 4319-072 8\nBP 71 84 B- 775 AgreeReaty ADC 75.03. 0.03. 252. | 2 U0 BE B23) icing) a a Mh [92.61 97 Ae 36 CheckpointTher CKPT 267 023 190 | 82 25 9 Ax 124 EcoWaveGlob WAVE 920 045-28) W882 95C 87 Newenintl \u2014 NAN 7.94 016-8\n89 71 98 A- 40 Alliance\u00e9nt ARENT \u00ab331 O01 -71 1 : \" 7B W BA 134 ChicAtlanteBde LIEN 13.00 O04 -20 423) 95 A+ 4.6 EledonPhrma ELON = 3.99 -0.15 39 | 89 75.89 B- 48\u00b0 Nokia NOK A477 003 4\n90 67 95 A 37 Alot itd ALT 346 001 90 | Pe D avsdilic BW dae toy 4 | 79 86 67 B 50 Chinaduto CAAS. 430. 0124) | 77 87 64 B 17.0 mbt AKOA 1391 000 -98 | 92 84 BR C9648 Nv NR 9329.74-126.66 41\n92 93 68 A 194 AlpinelncPion \u2014 PINE 17.83 043-3 | 9 oe ce eg eae ning SAN 492-009 -g [75.58.96 Br 47 Cheomadex CDK 347 009 22 | O2 8 9 C M4 EmbtitB AKOB 1819-070 -45 ) 8 91 63 B 203 OldPoint OPOF 20.39 043 35\n75 4 99 B+ 53. ANSSigma AUS 200 10-81 |) ge gs A aga Bonkeint WC O02) ds 37 [88 27 90A 80 CipherMining \u2014-CIFR 56-013 -1 | M2 6 WA 56 Encvslv EXK 538-008 37 | 87 92 36.A- 68 Ololne OO 507-001 -11\n86 & 85 Ae 24 AmerAssets AAT 2750 -0.26 26 2 Bank Fir eT | oo BT Bb Be 143. CitansCmt CaM 1412 001 gg | 28 75 28 Be 104 EnfusionA ENFN 896 -0.05 51 | 81 48 87 B 41.9 Omegatltheare \u00a9 OH! 4155 017-5\npies . #1 % 43.0 103. Barings BBIC 987 0.0) 19 itensCmty : tb OR\n4 16 97 A+ 268 Amritheret AHR 7587 -DO? 58 175 6 ou cages BelfeoeA BELFA WARE O16 ay [88 64 THB 659 CitensFin CFS 5810 0 -g | 8! 61 99 Br 27 Eoskng\u00e9mtp \u2014\u00abEOSE 3.34 0.21 -35 | 75 AB 79 Be 288 Oneliberty DIP 2682-054 -20\n88 85 76 8-234 Amerlower AMT 772.80 -3.13 5 94 96 77 D- 10.0 BGC Grou BRC 014 14 19 | 87 OWA 7.1 ClipperRealty CLIPR 439 0.29 No 9B 33 Equillium EO 1.18 04 \u00ab19 | &2 42 97 Be 1.8 Onfolio ONFO 1.19 O10 2\na4 Ambimd 7 Bot Grou net, ns | 91 85 B2 Be9149 Equinix EQIX 1443 1847 133 | 92 73.90 B+ 139 OPBancom OPBK 115 032 19\n8 G4 a2 B 414 AmHm AMH S827 -0.35 15 | gq 64 9B 89 Biocryst BCRX 7.95 0.29 -16 | %5 76 Bb B 6&8 CodaQctopus CODA 892 019 -2 : 5\n: : a Bich an th : 7% 61 7) C- 788 EquityRes EOR 7467-139 -30 | 97 80 9 Ae 56. Oppfi OPFL 5.05 -007 15\n7 63\u00b094 B- 89 AmnealPhrma \u2014 AMRX 8.40 0.07 44 | gy 93 93 Be 53. Bit Digital Brey 3.93 007 42 | 92 60 97 B- 7.7 Coeur Mining CDE 680-031 9 :\n3 Bi mel , i 8) 36 94-8 Bb EricssonlmTl ERIC. \u00abB44 006-17 | 97 85 96 B 104 Optexsys OPS 970-0\n99 1 99 8. 31.3 Amrep AMR 2259 1.29 47 | 79 G1 71 D+ 143 BitdeerTechs -BTDR 7.83 -0.71 -28 | 90 75 99 B- 39 Coffeetidg WA 3.19 004-41\n77\u00b070 75 Be U1 Angi NGL 24? 0.00 -50 ! ee a : yy | #2 73 8B Od Esperionther ESPR 2.10 0.04 10 | 9195 65 B- 50 OptimumBk OPH 480 0.00 86\n7 ae i i 5 599 B+ AG Blendlabs = BUND. 3.35 010-31 | 81 NF As 68 Commscope COMM 6.22 0.13 3 | oF 95 Bh B+ 345 EssPrpReallr \u00a9 EPRT 3260 -0.74 14 | 91 91 44 Be 640 OrangeCtyBnc \u00a9 OBT $3.15 3:30 5\n84 52 97 A 84 Annexon ANN 740-004 -58 | 77 51 90.8 901 BostonPrpty BK 8499 161-7 | 86 63 97 A- 68 Compass COMPS 0.02 -22 | py fo me paren DET eg ae titi Hede at\n7H 33-90 A 94 Apledtne \u2014APLT 843-049 2 | 7 gl OT A: 06 Bramoney\u201d \u2014BWAY 94) 003 48 | 7857 96.0 28 Comertherd CMIK 2m -oo 4 | Ol o2 7 GSIZT EssexPrty ESS 79545 -6.11 -28 | 79 65 90 A- 193 OutintMedia OUT 1833-078 \u00ab2\n3 : 85 20 98 A+ 86 EtonPharma ETON 8.11 -008 -40 | 77 40 72 B+ 22.0 ParkeBane PABK 2074-029 -24\n86 BY 7h B+ J4 ARCDOG ARC 343 0.00 -76 | 89 #1 92 B 48 BRESA BRFS 4.30 0.02 47 ) 76 48 87 A 7.0 Contextlogic \u00abLOGE \u00ab6.42 0.01 38 | go oy on eyyp40 Extra Space ER 164.40 -188 50 | 79 43-87 B 199\u00b0 Pathfinder PRHC 1786 001-6\n77 58 94 C 13.2 ArcutisBiother AROT 8.75 038 -7 | 77 81 82 Be 32 BrightScholar BEDU 1.90 OM -99 191 72 BTA 325 CoptDetnsPron COP 3229 027 -27 5 md oR ea\n87 60 83B 72 Finvolutionh \u2014 FINY 6.08 009 58 | 90 35 96 Ae 85 PayoneerGlbl \u00a9 PAYG 834 -0.01 -20\n& 39 93.B 166 FinwiseBac \u2014-FINW 16.06 G01 16 | B4 81 66.C 54 Paysign PAYS 371 -0.02 42\n90 89 TA a72 FrstBus FAIZ 4289 -193 40 | BL 42 98B 70 Petel Pcl 6,\n= - TH \u00a7? BO B- 980 FirstCaptl FCAP 9389 -0.08 <7 | 8 SB 96 A- 7.2 Peloton PION 6.28 O14 -20\nTo: All Persons who purchased or otherwise acquired Ampio Wi GI 4B 240 FrstCmly \u2014\u2014\u00bb\u00abFCCO. 7248-038 -22 | 98 91 83 A IA Pend PWOD 2560-015 -\u00a7\u00a7\n. 1. yw =o 8) 86 62 B- 574 Firstindust FR $3.61 -0.91 -6 | BO 36 90 B+ 40 Peformtfinl \u00a9 PFMT 386 0.00 -29\nPharmaceuticals, Inc.\u2019s (\u201cAmpio\u201d) common stock between 8h Md 04 Bs 249 FrstSvgs FSG 2575 144 197 | 76 17 98 Ap 10.7 Perpetuar PPTA 9460 0.28 =A\nv . gs i erpetuaksres 2 0.\n. . 9 92 91 B 319 Fistlntd FUNC 31.07 -013 55 | 75 49 60 C+492 Phenixtin PRK 75-025 -70\nDecember 29, 2020, and August 2, 2022, inclusive, and who BI 88 87 C 122 FrstUsBneshes FUSB 11.69 -001 114 | 75 78 55 C 39.1 Phillips\u00e9dison \u00a9 PECO 36.31 -0.70 3\nsiiffared dam 4 ges chersty (\u201cSettlemen t Class\u201d) eh 93 77 C- 350 Fitlite FILE 3171-052 4 | 76 63.948 42. Phoenix FENG 285 0.12 -92\n. BL 3693 A- 20 Flexshopper FRAY \u00ab157 O11 385 | 78 47 95 A+ 25 Phunware PHUN 1060 212 529\nB81 BB A+ 54 Flotekind FK 504 0.16 -8 | 79 $495 B+ 77 Pitney Bowes \u00a9 PRL \u00ab7.10 0.1539\nYOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to Ampio Pharmaceuticals Securities Settlement af a ts i FemrersThea a Es \u201c \u2019 8 3 # te a, ne An B\nRule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and P.O. Box 25226, Santa Ana, CA, 92799 9799 90 Be 64 FortunaSilver FSM 509 -0.12 19 | 96 82 95 A 1750 PrimeEnergy PNRG 16800 -210 -29\n: \u00abcet + om : 53 Bt 46 76 C 309 ACorners FCPT 70.24 -085 -33 | 80 49 98C 46 ProqvThera \u00a9 PROR 3.46 O01 -69\nan Order of the United States District Court for the info@AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com 88 75 838-470 FSBancop FSW 4363-111 -B4 | B7 71 84 C-3700 PublcStor PSA 39634 -207 17\nDistrict of Colorado, that Tao Wang and SynWorld 1-833-602-5027 TENE aie: ESN SBE oye en 8\n% * spe .. . ili | ay + vantComputng UF A\nLo ae ak coe Dae Inquiries, other than requests for the Notice/ Bo 2% A 89 Gale AS OB] BA 26 Oudin 2 28 te\nAction (\u201cLead Plaintiffs\u2019), on behalf of themselves 7 - : , 7 45 94 A 53 Gainthera GANX 7.65 -0.03 -A0 96 40. RaveRestrnt AVE 27T O10 4\n( Claim Form or for information about the status of [] | 1 % 978 55. cannettCo GCi 559 -003 -88 | 8B 7I 67 .B GAP Realtyincome \u00ab0 6131-200 a\nand all members of the Settlement Class and | claim, may also be made to Lead Counsel:James |} | 95 #1 94 8 64 Gent GNFT 550-009 -82 | 78 3 72 C- 753 Regencytntr REG TiO -099 44\n- pK . ( pio\") M. Wilson, Jr., FARUQE & FARUQE, LLP, 685 [| 5; 9 i 8.59 GiobluGipag \u00a98549 019-43 | 90 91 89 B 70.0. Republ RBCAA 6703 1.15 -15\nMichael A. Martino, Holli Cherevka, Dan Stokely, | Third Avenue, 26th Floor, New York, NY 10017. B GH A BO Gbusavk GET) HF | 77 MB Be 40 booms REBN 270 201\ni ili , i . . Bareiemile: : 81 68 Be 130 Govillalech 4b 0.22 at | 8 - 12 RichmondMut = RBI 13.00 -B.\nDavid BanOs; Philip eb Coelho, and Richard B. | Telephone: 212-983-9330; Facsimile: 212-983-9331; I] | gg 51 a a. 43 Grablldgs GRAB. 407 00 2 | 93\u00b071.98-A. 4b RocuelMed RAT 475 O14\nGiles (the \u201cDefendants,\u201d and collectively with Lead | Email: jwilson@faruqilaw.com B1 29 98 A- 8.7 GrupoSuprviell SUPY 883 0.38 17 | 81 54 82 A- 19.3 SabraHither SBRA 1B. -0.21 -13\nPlaintiffs, the \u201cParties\u201d), have reached a proposed If you are a Settlement Class Member, to be f a f : a a a an ts i t Meh m2 fa oy a8 am 1 \u2018a\nsettlement of the claims in the Action in the amount eligible i\u00e9 share in the -dictibution of the Nec h (2 22\" 733 Healthpeak DOC 2229-071 84 | 91 BI BB B+ 86 ScullyRoyal SRL BIB D8 -75\nof $3,000,000 (the \u201cSettlement\u201d). \u201c : OW \u201d B- iW Hecla Ming HL 80 1B 5 | 82 78 83-0 122 Seanergy SHIP 9,75 -0,05 -30\n, , Settlement Fund. you must submit a Claim Form 9B Bt 92 B+ 120 HenssyAdvs HNNA 10,17 -0.07 -29 | 83 BD 89 B+ 99 SecrtyNtl SMFCA 9.74 -DL0L =?\nA. heart Sit be isla Retive he: B ble saa ore ie J ec BhAUV ROL h 837497 A al High Tide HiT] 302 O07 71 | 97 81 97.B 72 SensusHealth SRIS 637 -007 -74\nA hearing will be held betore the Honorable | postmarked or submitted electronically no later than }f | \u00ab 57 93 4. 368. Highwood HW 3484-075 4B ] 96 48-94 A 27 SiebertFncl SIEB 258 0,00 -52\nWilliam J. Martinez, on February 19, 2025, at| January 13, 2025. If you are a Settlement Class e 4 e mu Ta re a Z a pee He Seas au BA vs \u201c|\n10:30 a.m. in Courtroom A801 of the United States | Member and do not timely submit a valid Claim Form, |} |g \u00a7 14 40490 Honedne Heb. 4655 bor 106 | 90.71 86 B 1771. SimonPropety $96 17050 -200 2\nDistrict Court for the District of Colorado, at the | you will not be eligible to share in the distribution of 81 61 90 B+ 22 HowrLoop HOUR \u00ab1.49 0.03 -6B } 78 44 95 B+ 101 Site Centers SIC 16.88 -0.29 -83\ns : 90 B94 B- 105 HudbayMnris HEM 9.62 0009-35 | 80 60 96 A- 721 SLGreenkty SLG 7h61 -086\nAlfred A. Arraj Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, the Net Settlement Fund, but you will nevertheless 82 58 98 B+ 27 Hyllion A HVLN 240-005 -38 | 77 ABB 23 Snail SNAL 145 -0.27 55\nCO 80294 (the \u201cSettlement Hearing\u201d) to, among] be bound by all judgments or orders entered by the ] |\" 7% \u00a74 langle MST a 2 | 8B 7 SSatebe SK SIT ON a\nother things, determine whether the Court should: (i) | Court relating to the Settlement, whether favorable J | 7 9 5 & 139 immeision \u2014\u2014IMMR--666 017-49 | 8B BI 96 Be ARI. Stator SIRT 3916 O24 #1\napprove the proposed Settlement as fair, reasonable, | or unfavorable. 2% he 48 Imboseer \u00abKT LO AD a |G DOTA MD Toma \u00ab= SMT OA) OD\nand adequate; (ii) dismiss the Action with prejudice} \u2014 [f you are a Settlement Class Member and wish to [J | 2 1 91 81383 Innovatvind PR 131.86 -1.79 -49 | 9% 80 9% B- 195. TATTech TAIT 18a? 005-59\nas provided in the Sipulation and Aereement of 90 91 51 B+ 90 InnovSitn SSC 7.19 -0.01 57 | 84 80 BY B+ 10.0 TelecmArgnt TED 865 O51 62\np Pp } AgT exclude yourself from the Settlement Class, you must 5 BI 77 C- 78 Inter&Colnch NTR \u00ab6.45 -0.06 -42 | 08 59 99 A- 66 TeraWulf WULF 438 017 76\nSettlement, dated May 13, 2024; (ili) approve the | submit a written request for exclusion in accordance |} | % % 74903 lnventrustfrop IVT 29.20 026-80] 82 69 99 Av 211 TevogenBio WGN. 306 49-13\nroposed Plan of Allocation for distribution of \u2018 5 : = 4) 77 9) 042437 InvstrTitle MC 232.30 -290 135 | 79 60 60 B+ 392 Bank Princeton BPRN 36.90 -0.17 -40\nprop \u2018 t STD UL with the instructions set forth in the Notice such that |} | 9 61 9 8. 34 iPower PW 1.48 -0.02 -86 | 82 81 BF B 100 ThOktd NeTY 836-005 67\nthe settlement funds available for distribution to| jt is received no later than January 29, 2025. Lf | | 7 2% 9 8+ 158 \\nistnergy REN 9.25 O01 26 | 75 81 75 C- 9.7 TpgRerinfrust \u00a9 TRIX 8.37 012 5\ni! i + 40 Tr i\nSettlement Class Members (the \u201cNet Settlement | you properly exclude yourself from the Settlement q e : a Pas rm te i 7 \u2018 i a is iain \u201c 16 i! ;\nFund\u201d); and (iv) approve Lead Counsel\u2019s Fee and 5 i ; ; Sar 9h 65 84 B+ 86 Jiayin Grp A JIN 691 O07 -75 | 78 50 68 B 40 Truecar TRUE 374-008 -25\n. ye ( ) PP a Class; you will not be bound by any: Judgments or 87 7B 88 A- 509 JohnWileySonsB WLYB 4927 002 0 | 90 81 92 D+ 18 TuniuA TOUR 1.16 00-48\nExpense Application. The Court may change the date | orders entered by the Court relating to the Settlement, J | 9 s1 91.\u00a2 81. JourneyMedical DERM 576 034 27 | 79 59 77 B+ 475 UDRINC UDR 4387 -064 14\nof the Settlement Hearin *, or hold it tele honicall i - 1 %5 81 79 B+ 20.0 Kenon KEN 27.03 0.06 -4? | O7 84 BO B+ 20.6 UMHPrptys UME 18.95 -0.19 60\n: Lo 6 ; P Y: WRC iavonibis'ot ianleavGtable, ad you will not Wl tg ya 61 KeyTronic KCC 593-003 -78 | 94 84 95 Cy 163 Utd Guardn UG 1211 019-66\nwithout providing another notice. You do NOT |be eligible to share in the distribution of the Net TT 55 BA B+ 43.8 Kilroy Rity KRC 4142 0.26 6 | 87 52 67 B+ 9.0 USecBe UFO 884-009 4\nneed to \u2018attend \u2018the Settlement ine 4 fuaa | $4 60 82 B 247 KimcoRity KIM 2255-040 -28 | 89 65 86 B 223 Urban Edge UE 7181 027-0\neee _ y oe = Meat a a receive a Settlement Fund % 81 99 Be 124 Kingstone KINS 978-012 -69 | 82 88 67 D+ SBS Value line VALU 4839-279 TT\nistribution from the Net Settlement Fund. i gt \u2018 6 81 75.B 96 KoreablecPwr \u00ab= KEP. \u00abLIB -011 -10 | 83 57 91 B+ 66.2 Ventas VIR 6497 09-3\nAny objections to the proposed Settlement, Lead\n\u201c4 ; aie ; 98 28B 70 Lantrom URX 407 003-49 | 82 80 5B B- 343. Vici Props vicl 32.10 071-14\nIF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF _ THE)|Counsel\u2019s Fee and Expense Application, and/or the 79 69 8A 73 Latham SWIM 652 007-48 | 80 6? 97 A- 72.7 VillageBnk VBFC 76.05 -0.40 -82\nSETTLEMENT CLASS, YOUR RIGHTS | proposed Plan of Allocation must be filed with the J | jo eh ae Te ae ck WO dae Goes\nWILL BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED | Court, either by mail or in person, and be mailed 7 aM 5 B- 21.9 LibrtyGlbe LATYB 20.60 uy 4 : 2 ne : aie fat i i au 2\nRi ; wae i \u2018 85 94 69 B 24 LichenChing LIN 184 007 90 2 8B B> 32 VoxRealty VOXR 305 07-25\nSETTLEMENT AND YOU MAY BE ENTITLED |to counsel for the Parties in accordance with the f | & og 7 \u00a7 63 tincoancop MKB 449 008-5 | 6 196A 117 VorninlA YORK 755 000-98\nTO A MONETARY PAYMENT. You may obtain | instructions in the Notice, such that they are received a & 2 E i Loe a My \u2018 . \u2018 o Yat ms a au iz\n\u2018\u00e9 4 = + : + Oyds Wo 7 4. angaceeblp J |\ncopies of the Notice and Proof of Claim Form by |\"@ later than January 29, 2025. 81 93498 28 LumentFinanc LET 256 001 -S1 | 90 81 91 B-1925 Wellfower WELL 190.20 -1.84 -31\nvisiting the website of the Claims Administrator, $3 79 60 A- 127 MagyarBanc = MGYR 1237-000 -87 | 79 65 7B B 145 Whitestone WSR 4.17 0.11 -64\noe sie PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT THE COURT, |p | 5p 9 9p. 02 anitex MIX 6.70 0.00 90 | 85 85 79.C 70 Wipro WIT 6.56 003 67\nwww.AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com, or by DEFENDANTS, OR DEFENDANTS\u2019 COUNSEL 94 81 94 B+ 69 Mannkind MNKD 654 0.10 ~41 | 95 78 96 D- 86 X Financial A WF 470 10-81\ncontacting the Claims Administrator at: 9) 81 95 B- 22 MarisTech MTEK 1.90 0.01 -77 | 76 24 94 B+ 33 XerisBiophrma \u00a9 XERS 3.20 -0.0 49\ng REGARDING THIS NOTICE. 7 7859.8 47 Massimo MAMO 3.92 O11 326] BO 40 88B 24 Xunlel Ltd, XNET 204 -Q02 -12\n7h 6 67 Be 101 Medallion MIN 9.07 0.05 25 | 95.63. C 92 YirenDigital YRO \u00a7.66 005-54\n; _ 91 50 Bf A 142 Meridian MRBK 1319 O21 150] 75 81 81 B 13. Yoshitsu TKLE 051 0.02 999\nbcs iPr Pes AWA a alel(eht-olligia(-\u2014hy-1ad(-lnt-iple eel ia| 78 66 75 C+1674 MidAmAp MAA 199.32 -275 -37 | 87 68 91 A+ 6.0 Youdao A DAO 4.83 0.04 -40\n1) 87 51 Be 46 Mizuho MEG 409 0.01 -71 | 8 81 60 B 108 Zuora A 20 9.86 001-54\n7 1 77. A 20\u00b0 Mobilicom MOB 139 005 88 | 8) 6 81 B+ 63 ZuraBin RA 474 O14 10\n\n\u00a92024 Investor\u2019s Business Daily, LLC. All rights reserved.\n\n","ocr_status":1,"date_upload":"2026-06-24T12:58:32.933890-07:00","document_number":"99","attachment_number":5,"pacer_doc_id":"039011687853","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":2,"description":"Exhibit E - Publication Notice","acms_document_guid":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/483906419/","id":483906419,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/64904094/99/6/wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc/","date_created":"2026-06-24T12:57:44.058245-07:00","date_modified":"2026-06-25T05:14:35.646318-07:00","sha1":"6b853a63f55b5b1f09204cf720da135d8c1b0048","page_count":38,"file_size":1857260,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.99.6.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.99.6.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 1 of 38\n\n\n\n\n EXHIBIT F\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 2 of 38\n\n\n\n\nSimpluris Announces Proposed\nSettlement involving purchasers of\nAmpio Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s\n(\"Ampio\") Common Stock\n\n\n\n\nNEWS PROVIDED BY\nSimpluris Inc. \uf0ab\nOct 28, 2024, 08:00 ET\n\n\n\n\nCOSTA MESA, Calif., Oct. 28, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- The following statement is being issued by Simpluris,\nInc., court-appointed settlement administrator, regarding the proposed settlement in Wang, et al., v. Ampio\nPharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-MEH (D. Colo.).\n\n\nTo: All Persons who purchased or otherwise acquired Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s (\"Ampio\") common\nstock between December 29, 2020, and August 2, 2022, inclusive, and who suffered damages thereby\n(\"Settlement Class\").\n\n\n\nYOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and an Order of\nthe United States District Court for the District of Colorado, that Tao Wang and SynWorld Technologies\nCorporation, Lead Plaintiffs in the Action (\"Lead Plaintiffs\"), on behalf of themselves and all members of the\nSettlement Class and Defendants Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (\"Ampio\"), Michael A. Martino, Holli\n\n\n \uf045\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 3 of 38\nCherevka, Dan Stokely, David Bar-Or, Philip H. Coelho, and Richard B. Giles (the \"Defendants,\" and\ncollectively with Lead Plaintiffs, the \"Parties\"), have reached a proposed settlement of the claims in the\nAction in the amount of $3,000,000 (the \"Settlement\").\n\n\nA hearing will be held before the Honorable William J. Martinez, on February 19, 2025, at 10:30 a.m. in\nCourtroom A801 of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, at the Alfred A. Arraj\nCourthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, CO 80294 (the \"Settlement Hearing\") to, among other things,\ndetermine whether the Court should: (i) approve the proposed Settlement as fair, reasonable, and\nadequate; (ii) dismiss the Action with prejudice as provided in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement,\ndated May 13, 2024; (iii) approve the proposed Plan of Allocation for distribution of the settlement funds\navailable for distribution to Settlement Class Members (the \"Net Settlement Fund\"); and (iv) approve Lead\nCounsel's Fee and Expense Application. The Court may change the date of the Settlement Hearing, or hold\nit telephonically, without providing another notice. You do NOT need to attend the Settlement Hearing to\nreceive a distribution from the Net Settlement Fund.\n\n\n IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF THE SETTLEMENT CLASS, YOUR RIGHTS WILL BE AFFECTED BY THE\n PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO A MONETARY PAYMENT. You may obtain\n copies of the Notice and Proof of Claim Form by visiting the website of the Claims Administrator,\n www.AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com, or by contacting the Claims Administrator at:\n Ampio Pharmaceuticals Securities Settlement\n P.O. Box 25226\n Santa Ana, CA 92799\n info@AmpioSecuritiesSettlement.com\n 1-833-602-5027\n\n\nInquiries, other than requests for the Notice/Claim Form or for information about the status of a claim, may\nalso be made to Lead Counsel:\n\n\n James M. Wilson, Jr.\n FARUQI & FARUQI, LLP\n 685 Third Avenue, 26th Floor\n New York, NY 10017\n\n\n \uf045\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 4 of 38\n Telephone: 212-983-9330\n Facsimile: 212-983-9331\n Email: jwilson@faruqilaw.com\n\n\nIf you are a Settlement Class Member, to be eligible to share in the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund,\nyou must submit a Claim Form postmarked or submitted electronically no later than January 13, 2025. If\nyou are a Settlement Class Member and do not timely submit a valid Claim Form, you will not be eligible to\nshare in the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, but you will nevertheless be bound by all judgments or\norders entered by the Court relating to the Settlement, whether favorable or unfavorable.\n\n\nIf you are a Settlement Class Member and wish to exclude yourself from the Settlement Class, you must\nsubmit a written request for exclusion in accordance with the instructions set forth in the Notice such that it\nis received no later than January 29, 2025. If you properly exclude yourself from the Settlement Class,\nyou will not be bound by any judgments or orders entered by the Court relating to the Settlement, whether\nfavorable or unfavorable, and you will not be eligible to share in the distribution of the Net Settlement\nFund.\n\n\nAny objections to the proposed Settlement, Lead Counsel's Fee and Expense Application, and/or the\nproposed Plan of Allocation must be filed with the Court, either by mail or in person, and be mailed to\ncounsel for the Parties in accordance with the instructions in the Notice, such that they are received no\nlater than January 29, 2025.\n\n\n\n PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT THE COURT, DEFENDANTS, OR DEFENDANTS' COUNSEL REGARDING\n THIS NOTICE.\n\n\n\nDated: October 15, 2024\nBY ORDER OF THE COURT\nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\nDISTRICT OF COLORADO\n\n\nSOURCE Simpluris Inc.\n\n\n\n \uf045\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 5 of 38\n WANT YOUR COMPANY'S NEWS\n\n FEATURED ON PRNEWSWIRE.COM?\n\n GET STARTED\n\n\n\n 440k+ 9k+ 270k+\n Newsrooms & Digital Media Journalists\n Influencers Outlets Opted In\n\n\n\n\n \uf045\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 6 of 38\n\n\nSimpluris Announces Proposed Settlement involving purchasers of Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s (\"Ampio\")\n\nCommon Stock\n\n\n View Release\nEnglish PR Newswire ID: 4285585-2 Clear Time Oct 28, 2024 8:00 AM ET\n\n\n\n\n Pickup\n\n\n\n\n 151.9M 335\n TOTAL POTENTIAL AUDIENCE TOTAL EXACT MATCHES\n\n\n\n\nTOP EXACT MATCH PICKUP\n\n\n AP NEWS [The ...\n 45.7M visitors/month [1]\n\n\n Benzinga\n 11.9M visitors/month [1]\n\n\n KTLA [Los Ang...\n 7.1M visitors/month [1]\n\n\n\n PR Newswire\n 5.6M visitors/month [1]\n\n\n WFLA [Tampa, FL]\n 5M visitors/month [1]\n\n\n Seeking Alpha\n 4.6M visitors/month [1]\n\n\n\n WJW-TV FOX-8 ...\n 4.1M visitors/month [1]\n\n\n WXIN-TV FOX-5...\n 3.2M visitors/month [1]\n\n\n KXAN-TV NBC-3...\n 2.8M visitors/month [1]\n\n\n\n KTVI-TV FOX-2...\n 2.4M visitors/month [1]\n\n\n WGN [Chicago,...\n 2.2M visitors/month [1]\n\n\n KDVR [Denver,...\n 2.1M visitors/month [1]\n\n\n\n WKRN [Nashvil...\n 2M visitors/month [1]\n\n\n KSWB [San Die...\n 1.8M visitors/month [1]\n\n\n KRON [San Fra...\n 1.8M visitors/month [1]\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 7 of 38\n *DATA SOURCES: [1] [2] ALEXA, [3] SITEWORTHTRAFFIC.COM [4] CISION DIGITAL REACH\n\n\n *THE DATA CITED HERE BY SIMILARWEB REPRESENTS SITE TRAFFIC DATA OF WORLDWIDE UNIQUE VISITORS ON DESKTOP AND MOBILE DEVICES. DATA IS UPDATED MONTHLY.\n\n\n\n\n Views & Engagement\n\n\nViews & Engagement data will continue to mature over time. Totals below are expected to have reached 98% maturity when the circles below are darker in color.\n\n\n\n\n 5 1,155\n CLICK-THROUGHS RELEASE VIEWS\n\n\n\n\n Multimedia Views\n\n\n\n\n 99 Views\n\n\n\n\n Distribution\n\n\n\n\n 900\n TOTAL AP OUTLETS DISTRIBUTED\n\n\n\n\n TOP AP OUTLETS\n\n\n C-SPAN\n 86.2M Visitors/Month\n Washington, DC\n\n Scribd, Inc.\n 43.5M Visitors/Month\n San Francisco, CA\n\n FoxNews.com\n 32.5M Visitors/Month\n New York, NY\n\n CBS News Radio\n 30M Visitors/Month\n New York, NY\n\n\n New York Time...\n 29.9M Visitors/Month\n New York, NY\n\n\n Apple Inc.\n 29.7M Visitors/Month\n Cupertino, CA\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 8 of 38\n CNBC.com\n 26.1M Visitors/Month\n Englewood Cliffs, NJ\n\n\n CBSnews.com\n 26.1M Visitors/Month\n New York, NY\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 9 of 38\n\n\n\nPickup\n\n\n\nOverview\n TOTAL PICKUP 335 TOTAL POTENTIAL AUDIENCE 151.9M\n\n Exact Match 335 postings Exact Match 151.9M visitors\n\n\n\n\nTotal Pickup Over Time\nTotal pickup since your content was distributed\n 400\n\n\n\n 350\n\n 335.0\n 300\n Total Pickup Count\n\n\n\n\n 250\n\n\n\n 200\n\n\n 150\n\n\n\n 100\n\n\n 50\n\n\n 0\n 28 Oct\n\n\n\n\nTotal Pickup by Source Type Total Pickup by Industry\n\n\n\n\n Broadcast Media (178/53.1%) Media & Information (319/95.2%)\n Newspaper (118/35.2%) Financial (5/1.5%)\n Online News Sites & Other Influencers (20/6.0%) General (5/1.5%)\n Print Media (9/2.7%) Business Services (3/0.9%)\n News & Information Service (3/0.9%) Medical/Healthcare (1/0.3%)\n Other (7/2.1%) Other (2/0.6%)\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 10 of 38\n\n\nExact Match Pickup\nExact matches are full text postings of your content which we have found in the online and social media that we\nmonitor. Understand how it is calculated.\n\nTotal Exact Matches: 335\nTotal Potential Audience: 151,866,027\n\n\n Logo Outlet Name Location Source Type Industry Potential\n Audience\n\n\n AP NEWS [The Associated Press] United News & Information Service Media & Information 45,724,865 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n AP NEWS [The Associated Press] United News & Information Service Media & Information 45,724,865 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Benzinga United Online News Sites & Other Financial 11,940,583 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States Influencers visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KTLA [Los Angeles, CA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 7,073,654 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n PR Newswire Global PR Newswire Media & Information 5,590,155 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WFLA [Tampa, FL] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 4,950,418 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Seeking Alpha United Online News Sites & Other Financial 4,601,954 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States Influencers visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WJW-TV FOX-8 [Cleveland, OH] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 4,127,594 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WXIN-TV FOX-59 [Indianapolis, IN] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 3,161,353 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KXAN-TV NBC-36 [Austin, TX] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 2,755,722 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KTVI-TV FOX-2 [St. Louis, MO] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 2,367,016 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WGN [Chicago, IL] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 2,152,454 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KDVR [Denver, CO] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 2,091,917 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WKRN [Nashville, TN] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 2,003,550 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KSWB [San Diego, CA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 1,837,749 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KRON [San Francisco, CA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 1,774,145 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 11 of 38\n WGHP [Greensboro, NC] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 1,653,457 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WPIX-TV CW-11 [New York, NY] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 1,648,704 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WAVY-TV NBC-10 [Portsmouth, VA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 1,625,198 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WFMZ-TV IND-69 [Allentown, PA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 1,421,027 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WFMZ-TV IND-69 [Allentown, PA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 1,421,027 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WDAF [Kansas City, MO] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 1,417,348 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WCMH [Columbus, OH] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 1,404,208 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WRIC [Richmond, VA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 1,290,843 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KOIN-TV CBS-6 [Portland, OR] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 1,243,184 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KTVX [Salt Lake City, UT] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 1,202,282 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WNCN [Raleigh, NC] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 1,194,115 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KLAS-TV CBS-8 [Las Vegas, NV] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 1,188,973 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WOOD [Grand Rapids, MI] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 1,147,492 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KFOR [Oklahoma City, OK] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 1,135,961 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KTXL [Sacramento, CA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 1,089,889 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KRQE [Albuquerque, NM] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 968,199 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WHTM [Harrisburg, PA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 964,259 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WTNH [New Haven, CT] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 958,827 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WKBN-TV CBS-27 [Youngstown, OH] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 917,545 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 12 of 38\n WATE [Knoxville, TN] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 906,136 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WWLP-TV NBC-22 [Springfield, MA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 895,235 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WREG [Memphis, TN] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 850,584 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WPRI/WNAC [Providence, RI] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 787,926 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WDTN/WBDT [Dayton, OH] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 711,490 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KHON [Honolulu, HI] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 643,996 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KSNW [Wichita, KS] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 604,897 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WANE [Fort Wayne, IN] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 595,453 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WBRE/WYOU [Wilkes-Barre, PA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 595,400 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WFRV [Green Bay, WI] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 588,841 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WIVB [Buffalo, NY] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 577,087 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WROC/WUHF/WZDX [Rochester, NY] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 573,570 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WTEN/ WXXA-TV [Albany, NY] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 533,897 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WJTV-TV CBS-12 [Jackson, MS] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 529,935 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KSNT-TV NBC-27 [Topeka, KS] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 516,197 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KELO [Sioux Falls, SD] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 515,945 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KARK-TV NBC-4 [Little Rock, AR] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 502,328 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WHNT [Huntsville, AL] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 499,355 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WJHL-TV/ABC Tri-Cities [Johnson City, TN] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 447,964 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 13 of 38\n WSYR-TV ABC-9 NewsChannel [Syracuse, NY] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 438,087 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WBOY [Clarksburg, WV] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 420,890 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KGET [Bakersfield, CA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 408,123 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WTRF [Wheeling, WV] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 406,388 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WKRG [Mobile, AL] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 406,110 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KTSM [El Paso, TX] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 377,752 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WHO-TV NBC-13 [Des Moines, IA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 377,347 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WTAJ [Altoona, PA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 354,846 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WBTW [Myrtle Beach, SC] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 353,827 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WJZY-TV FOX-46 [Charlotte, NC] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 350,046 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WSPA/WYCW [Spartanburg, SC] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 335,202 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WLNS-TV CBS-6 [Lansing, MI] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 314,249 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KXRM [Colorado Springs, CO] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 313,103 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WDVM-TV IND-25 [Washington, DC] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 312,370 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WQRF/WTVO [Rockford, IL] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 301,671 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KVEO-TV CBS-4 [Harlingen, TX] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 278,191 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WCBD-TV NBC-2 [Charleston, SC] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 269,817 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KNWA/KFTA [Fayetteville, AR] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 263,841 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WMBB-TV ABC-13 [Panama City, FL] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 262,856 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 14 of 38\n WNCT [Greenville, NC] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 259,227 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KLFY [Lafayette, LA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 257,035 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WCIA-TV CBS 3 [Champaign, IL] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 246,019 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WEHT/WTVW [Evansville, IN] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 240,192 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KLRT-TV FOX-16 [Little Rock, AR] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 239,657 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WJET-TV ABC-24 / WFXP-TV FOX-44 [Erie, PA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 234,736 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KAMC/KLBK United Broadcast Media Media & Information 228,858 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WIAT [Birmingham, AL] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 226,136 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KOLR/KOZL [Springfield, MO] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 225,579 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WSAV [Savannah, GA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 224,244 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WJBF [Augusta, GA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 215,384 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KSEE/KGPE [Fresno, CA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 213,602 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KREX/KFQX/KGJT [Grand Junction, CO] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 212,160 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KSNF/KODE [Joplin, MO] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 204,535 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WDKY-TV FOX-56 [Lexington, KY] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 202,464 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WOWK-TV CBS-13 [Charleston, WV] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 196,434 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WFXR [Roanoke, VA United Broadcast Media Media & Information 193,143 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WVNS [Beckley, WV] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 188,374 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WVLA [Baton Rouge, LA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 185,550 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 15 of 38\n WETM-TV NBC-18 [Elmira, NY] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 185,396 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KTAB/KRBC [Abilene, TX] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 173,007 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KLST/KSAN [San Angelo, TX] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 161,621 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WMBD-TV CBS 31 / WYZZ-TV FOX 43 [Peoria, IL] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 158,680 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KIAH [Houston, TX] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 148,298 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KETK-TV FOX-51 [Tyler, TX] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 148,244 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KXMA/KXMB [Bismark, ND] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 147,477 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WRBL [Columbus, GA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 146,017 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WGNO [New Orleans, LA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 143,757 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KTAL-TV NBC-6 [Shreveport, LA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 129,326 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WDHN-TV ABC [Webb, AL] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 115,747 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Myhighplains United Broadcast Media Media & Information 115,022 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KFDX-TV NBC-3 / KJTL-TV FOX-18 [Wichita Falls, TX] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 110,572 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WTWO-TV NBC-2/WAWV-TV ABC-38 MyWabashValley United Broadcast Media Media & Information 109,718 [1]\n [Terre Haute IN] States visitors/month\n Online \uf108 View Release\n\n\n QuadCities WHBF-TV CBS-4 / KLJB-TV FOX-18 [Rock Island, United Broadcast Media Media & Information 104,235 [1]\n IL] States visitors/month\n Online \uf108 View Release\n\n\n Albert Lea Tribune [Albert Lea, MN] United Newspaper Media & Information 102,700 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WICZ-TV FOX-40 [Binghamton, NY] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 95,304 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KWKT-TV FOX-44 / KYLE-TV MyNetworkTV [Woodway, TX] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 89,889 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WTTV [Indianapolis, IN] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 88,542 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 16 of 38\n KARD/KTVE [West Monroe, LA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 87,229 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KCAU-TV ABC-9 Siouxland Proud [Sioux City, IA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 85,131 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Salisbury Post United Newspaper Media & Information 76,417 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n The Vicksburg Post United Newspaper Media & Information 74,321 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NCN: Panhandle - News Channel Nebraska [Grand Island, United Broadcast Media Media & Information 68,852 [1]\n NE] States visitors/month\n Online \uf108 View Release\n\n\n WFFF-TV FOX 44 / WVNY-TV ABC-22 [Colchester, VT] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 64,949 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KMID/KPEJ [Odessa, TX] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 63,556 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WBGH/WIVT [Binghamton, NY] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 61,850 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Natchez Democrat United Newspaper Media & Information 58,441 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n LaGrange Daily News United Newspaper Media & Information 56,768 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Magnolia State Live United Newspaper Media & Information 49,450 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Austin Daily Herald United Newspaper Media & Information 44,697 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Port Arthur News United Newspaper Media & Information 44,688 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KDAF-TV CW-33 [Dallas, TX] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 43,276 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n The Oxford Eagle United Newspaper Media & Information 43,012 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Shelby County Reporter United Newspaper Media & Information 42,651 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Washington Daily News United Newspaper Media & Information 42,418 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WWTI-TV ABC-50 [Watertown, NY] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 40,557 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NCN: Northeast - News Channel Nebraska [Norfolk, NE] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 39,184 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 17 of 38\n NCN: Southeast - News Channel Nebraska [Beatrice, NE] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 38,729 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Leader Publications United Newspaper Media & Information 38,712 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n The Suffolk News-Herald United Newspaper Media & Information 37,147 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NCN: River Country - NewsChannelNebraska [Nebraska United Broadcast Media Media & Information 35,850 [1]\n City, NE] States visitors/month\n Online \uf108 View Release\n\n\n WYTV-TV ABC-33 [Youngstown, OH] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 34,370 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n The Troy Messenger United Newspaper Media & Information 32,734 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NCN: Platte Valley - News Channel Nebraska [Columbus, United Broadcast Media Media & Information 31,783 [1]\n NE] States visitors/month\n Online \uf108 View Release\n\n\n Ironton Tribune United Newspaper Media & Information 30,067 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Winchester Sun United Newspaper Media & Information 29,604 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Alexander City Outlook United Newspaper Media & Information 27,957 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Elizabethton Star United Newspaper Media & Information 27,712 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Daily Leader United Newspaper Media & Information 27,628 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n The Coastland Times United Newspaper Media & Information 27,348 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n The Farmville Herald United Newspaper Media & Information 26,340 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n One News Page Hong Kong Information Website General 25,811 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n American Press United Newspaper Media & Information 25,797 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n The Roanoke Chowan News Herald United Newspaper Media & Information 24,905 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n L'Observateur United Newspaper Media & Information 23,815 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n The State Journal United Newspaper Media & Information 22,214 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 18 of 38\n The Andalusia Star-News United Newspaper Media & Information 21,829 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WPHL [Philadelphia, PA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 21,730 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n The Wetumpka Herald United Newspaper Media & Information 20,271 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Picayune Item United Newspaper Media & Information 19,962 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n CNYhomepage United Broadcast Media Media & Information 19,868 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Smithfield Times United Newspaper Media & Information 18,552 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NCN: Metro - News Channel Nebraska [Omaha, NE] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 16,908 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Valley Times-News United Newspaper Media & Information 15,766 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n The Tryon Daily Bulletin United Newspaper Media & Information 15,732 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Orange Leader United Newspaper Media & Information 14,811 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n The Bogalusa Daily News United Newspaper Media & Information 14,593 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n The Greenville Advocate United Newspaper Media & Information 13,616 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n The Advocate-Messenger United Newspaper Media & Information 12,907 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WLAX-TV FOX 28/45 [La Crosse, WI] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 12,826 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\nKilgore Kilgore News Herald, Kilgore, Texas United Newspaper Media & Information 12,112 [1]\nNews Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\nHerald,\nKilgore,\nTexas\n\n\n The Post-Searchlight United Newspaper Media & Information 11,179 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Jessamine Journal United Newspaper Media & Information 10,261 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n The Stanly News & Press United Newspaper Media & Information 10,040 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\nEastern Eastern Progress, Richmond, Kentucky United Newspaper Media & Information 9,505 [1]\nProgress, Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\nRichmond,\nKentucky\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 19 of 38\n NEWSNet United Broadcast Media Media & Information 8,967 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Alabama Now United Newspaper Media & Information 8,444 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n The Charlotte Gazette United Newspaper Media & Information 7,885 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WNTZ [Alexandria, LA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 7,576 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n The Clanton Advertiser United Newspaper Media & Information 7,551 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NewsBlaze US United Online News Sites & Other Media & Information 7,474 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States Influencers visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n The Demopolis Times United Newspaper Media & Information 7,123 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Claiborne Progress United Newspaper Media & Information 7,057 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n The Tidewater News United Newspaper Media & Information 6,654 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n The Selma Times-Journal United Newspaper Media & Information 6,382 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Davie County Enterprise Record United Newspaper Media & Information 5,945 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Middlesboro News United Newspaper Media & Information 5,515 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Northern Michigan NEWSNet United Broadcast Media Media & Information 5,349 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n The Brewton Standard United Newspaper Media & Information 5,076 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n The Panolian United Newspaper Media & Information 4,484 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n The Atmore Advance United Newspaper Media & Information 4,302 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Americus Times-Recorder United Newspaper Media & Information 4,155 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KHMT/KSVI [Billings, MT] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 3,780 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Kenbridge Victoria Dispatch United Newspaper Media & Information 3,556 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 20 of 38\n REFINITIV EIKON \uf023 United Financial Data, Research & Financial 3,471 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States Analytics visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n The Clemmons Courier United Newspaper Media & Information 3,335 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Latin Business Today United Online News Sites & Other Multicultural & 3,315 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States Influencers Demographic visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n The Interior Journal United Newspaper Media & Information 3,156 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NEWSNet Sports United Online News Sites & Other Media & Information 3,061 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States Influencers visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Windsor Weekly United Newspaper Media & Information 3,007 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KJUN-TV / KFOL-TV HTV10 [Houma, LA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 2,954 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n The Cameron Journal United Online News Sites & Other General 2,678 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States Influencers visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n BambuUp Vietnam Local Tech 2,603 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Cordele Dispatch United Newspaper Media & Information 2,317 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n The Tallassee Tribune United Newspaper Media & Information 1,991 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Gates County Index United Newspaper Media & Information 1,979 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Leesville Leader United Newspaper Media & Information 1,783 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Sangri Times India Online News Sites & Other General 1,766 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release Influencers visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Times of San Diego United Newspaper Media & Information 1,676 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Harlan Enterprise United Newspaper Media & Information 1,524 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\nThe Best The Best Times, Memphis, Tennessee United Newspaper Media & Information 1,362 [1]\nTimes, Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\nMemphis,\nTennessee\n\n\n Prentiss Headlight United Newspaper Media & Information 1,318 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Lowndes Signal United Newspaper Media & Information 1,274 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 21 of 38\n Bluegrass Live United Newspaper Media & Information 1,069 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WNC Business United Newspaper Media & Information 1,019 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n ChineseWire United Online News Sites & Other Media & Information 1,004 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States Influencers visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Ashland Town News United Newspaper Media & Information 986 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Luverne Journal United Newspaper Media & Information 964 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Holladay Journal United Newspaper Media & Information 911 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Fayetteville Connect United Newspaper Media & Information 810 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Walnut Creek Magazine United Newspaper Media & Information 805 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n West Jordan Journal United Newspaper Media & Information 796 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Gulf & Main Magazine United Newspaper Media & Information 785 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n The Chillicothe Hometown Voice United Newspaper Media & Information 775 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n South Jordan Journal United Newspaper Media & Information 766 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n RSW Living Magazine [Sanibel, FL] United Newspaper Media & Information 765 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Washington City Paper [Washington, DC] United Newspaper General 751 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Chester County Press United Newspaper Media & Information 692 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Sugar House Journal United Newspaper Media & Information 675 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Davis Journal United Newspaper Media & Information 662 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Midvale Journal United Newspaper Media & Information 656 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Columbia Business Monthly United Newspaper Media & Information 650 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 22 of 38\n Sandy Journal United Newspaper Media & Information 640 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Norfolk & Wrentham News United Newspaper Media & Information 640 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n T.U.B Investing Singapore Blog Financial 625 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Folsom Local News [Folsom, CA] United Online News Sites & Other Media & Information 619 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States Influencers visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Beauregard News United Newspaper Media & Information 605 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Medway & Millis News United Newspaper Media & Information 593 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Cottonwood Heights Journal United Newspaper Media & Information 572 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KLXS-FM 95.3 United Broadcast Media Media & Information 558 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n MB News United Newspaper Media & Information 551 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Natick Town News United Newspaper Media & Information 543 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Hopedale Town News United Newspaper Media & Information 538 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Herriman Journal United Newspaper Media & Information 526 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Connect Iredell United Newspaper Media & Information 521 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Toti.com United Newspaper Media & Information 514 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NCN: Sandhills - News Channel Nebraska [Grand Island, United Broadcast Media Media & Information 508 [1]\n NE] States visitors/month\n Online \uf108 View Release\n\n\n KKYA-FM 93.1 United Broadcast Media Media & Information 495 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n West Valley City Journal United Newspaper Media & Information 493 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Franklin Town News United Newspaper Media & Information 492 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n South Salt Lake Journal United Newspaper Media & Information 477 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 23 of 38\n City Journals United Newspaper Media & Information 470 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Cape Coral Living Magazine United Newspaper Media & Information 458 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Times of the Islands United Newspaper Media & Information 420 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Murray Journal United Newspaper Media & Information 413 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Holliston Town News United Newspaper Media & Information 413 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\nKBEW-AM KBEW-AM 1560 / KBEW-FM 98.1 COUNTRY [Blue Earth, MN] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 411 [1]\n1560 / Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\nKBEW-FM\n98.1\nCOUNTRY\n[Blue Earth,\nMN]\n\n\n Bradfordville Bugle United Newspaper Media & Information 396 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Southern Sports Today United Broadcast Media Media & Information 383 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Greenville Business Magazine United Newspaper Media & Information 380 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Millcreek Journal United Newspaper Media & Information 374 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Taylorsville Journal United Newspaper Media & Information 370 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NEWSnet Austin United Broadcast Media Media & Information 368 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Omaha Magazine United Newspaper Media & Information 367 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Norwood Town News United Newspaper Media & Information 364 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Taos News United Newspaper Media & Information 363 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KZZI-FM 95.9 United Broadcast Media Media & Information 349 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Middletown Life Magazine United Print Media Media & Information 348 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WNOW Frankly Media United Broadcast Media Media & Information 347 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 24 of 38\n Style Magazine United Newspaper Media & Information 342 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n The Podcast Park United Broadcast Media Media & Information 332 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Bonita & Estero Magazine United Newspaper Media & Information 318 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WHLF 95.3 FM [South Boston, VA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 310 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Hattiesburg.com United Online News Sites & Other Media & Information 300 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States Influencers visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n The Dam 94.3-FM United Broadcast Media Media & Information 300 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\neNews Park eNews Park Forest United Newspaper Media & Information 295 [1]\nForest Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n NEWSNet Portland United Broadcast Media Media & Information 294 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KYNT-AM 1450 United Broadcast Media Media & Information 274 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WLUS 98.3 FM [Clarksville, VA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 268 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n The Pioneer United Newspaper Media & Information 259 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KMLK 98.7-FM [El Dorado, AR] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 256 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WCNN 680 AM / 93.7 FM [Atlanta, GA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 255 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NEWSnet Columbus United Broadcast Media Media & Information 244 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NEWSnet Los Angeles United Online News Sites & Other Media & Information 241 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States Influencers visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n hood Magazine United Print Media Media & Information 210 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WSHV 96.7 FM [South Hill, VA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 198 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Draper Journal United Newspaper Media & Information 195 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Parish News [New Orleans, LA] United Newspaper Media & Information 194 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 25 of 38\n WKSK 101.9 FM [South Boston, VA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 194 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NEWSnet Detroit United Broadcast Media Media & Information 194 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NEWSNet Pittsburgh United Broadcast Media Media & Information 176 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NEWSnet Boise United Online News Sites & Other Media & Information 176 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States Influencers visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Z106.3 FM United Broadcast Media Media & Information 175 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NEWSNet Norfolk United Broadcast Media Media & Information 173 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KCCR-AM 1240 [Pierre, SD] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 165 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KCCR-FM 95.3 [Pierre, SD] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 160 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n 401kz.com United Online News Sites & Other Financial 158 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States Influencers visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WWDN 104.5 FM [Danville, VA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 141 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n VS News Network United Online News Sites & Other General 130 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States Influencers visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NEWSNet West Palm Beach United Broadcast Media Media & Information 129 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NEWSNet Sioux Falls United Broadcast Media Media & Information 129 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NEWSNet San Antonio United Broadcast Media Media & Information 129 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NEWSNet Salt Lake City United Broadcast Media Media & Information 129 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NEWSNet Sacremento United Online News Sites & Other Media & Information 129 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States Influencers visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NEWSNet Quincy United Broadcast Media Media & Information 129 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NEWSNet Odessa United Broadcast Media Media & Information 129 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NEWSnet Myrtle Beach United Broadcast Media Media & Information 129 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 26 of 38\n NEWSnet Miami United Broadcast Media Media & Information 129 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n East Hanover Florham Park Life United Print Media Media & Information 124 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NEWSnet Atlanta United Broadcast Media Media & Information 124 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NEWSnet Las Vegas United Broadcast Media Media & Information 123 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NEWSnet Hawaii United Online News Sites & Other Media & Information 123 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States Influencers visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NEWSnet Fresno United Broadcast Media Media & Information 114 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NEWSnet Augusta United Broadcast Media Media & Information 113 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n FACE Magazine United Newspaper Media & Information 103 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Los Angeles Biotech Networks United Industry Association Sites Medical/Healthcare 102 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n VYRE Business News Global United Online News Sites & Other Business Services 96 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States Influencers visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n VYRE Business News Global United Online News Sites & Other Business Services 96 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States Influencers visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KDAM-FM 94.3 United Broadcast Media Media & Information 95 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n indica News [San Ramon, CA] United Online News Sites & Other Media & Information 91 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States Influencers visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n KQRQ-FM 92.3 United Broadcast Media Media & Information 91 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Newsradio KOTA [Rapid City, SD] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 91 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Business Class News United Blog Media & Information 91 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Boreal Community Media United Newspaper Media & Information 78 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NEWSNet Orlando United Broadcast Media Media & Information 75 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WFOM 106.3 FM / 1230 AM [Atlanta, GA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 71 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 27 of 38\n WMPW 105.9 FM [Danville, VA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 61 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NEWSNet Waco United Broadcast Media Media & Information 54 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NEWSnet Nashville United Broadcast Media Media & Information 50 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NEWSnet Monterey United Online News Sites & Other Media & Information 50 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States Influencers visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NEWSnet Minneapolis United Broadcast Media Media & Information 50 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NEWSNet Tampa United Broadcast Media Media & Information 43 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NEWSnet Columbia United Broadcast Media Media & Information 37 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n NEWSnet Buffalo United Broadcast Media Media & Information 36 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n WWZW-FM Classic story96.7 [Lexington, VA] United Broadcast Media Media & Information 29 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Oregon Family United Print Media Media & Information 23 [1]\n Online \uf108 View Release States visitors/month\n\n\n\n\n Today's Family Magazine United Print Media Media & Information Not Available\n Online \uf108 View Release States\n\n\n\n\n San Clemente Journal United Print Media Media & Information Not Available\n Online \uf108 View Release States\n\n\n\n\n Pooler Magazine United Print Media Media & Information Not Available\n Online \uf108 View Release States\n\n\n\n\n Newark Life Magazine United Print Media Media & Information Not Available\n Online \uf108 View Release States\n\n\n\n\n Effingham Magazine United Print Media Media & Information Not Available\n Online \uf108 View Release States\n\n\n\n\n ame Fintech Pulse by Demand Media BPM United News & Information Service Business Services Not Available\n Online \uf108 View Release States\n\n\n\n\n [2] Alexa, [3] siteworthtraffic.com [4] Cision Digital\n*Data sources: [1] Reach\n*The data cited here by SimilarWeb represents site traffic data of worldwide unique visitors on desktop and mobile devices. Data is updated\nmonthly.\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 28 of 38\n\n\n\nTraffic\n\n\n\nOverview\n RELEASE VIEWS & HITS 1.2K MULTIMEDIA 2.7K\n\n Release Views 1.2K Image Views 99\n\n Media Views 62 Image Web Crawlers 2.6K\n\n Public Views 1.1K\n\n Partner Sites 128\n\n PR Newswire Properties 965\n\n Release Web Crawler Hits 23\n\n\n\n\nRelease Views\nRelease Views Over Time\n\n 10000\n\n\n\n 1 155\n 1000\n Release Views\n\n\n\n\n 100\n\n\n\n\n 10\n\n\n\n\n 1\n\n\n\n\n 0\n 28 Oct\n\n\n Cumulative Media Views Partner Sites PRN Properties\n\n\n\n\nMedia Views on PR Newswire for Journalists\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 29 of 38\n Top 10 Outlets\n\n Accion Labs (1) 1\n\n Randall-Reilly \u2026 1\n\n metatech.pk (1) 1\n\n MNM Services \u2026 1\n\n naradnewsusa\u2026 1\n\n National News\u2026 1\n\n Nawae Pakista\u2026 1\n\n New York 1 Ne\u2026 1\n\n News Aktuell (1) 1\n\n NewsRise (1) 1\n\n 0 1 2\n Views\n\n\n\n\nViews on Partner Sites\n\n Top 10 Sites\n\n Folsom Local \u2026 5\n\n Tallassee Trib\u2026 3\n\n The Best Time\u2026 2\n\n Alexander City\u2026 2\n\n VS News Netw\u2026 1\n\n REFINITIV EIK\u2026 1\n\n 401kz.com (1) 1\n\n One News Pag\u2026 1\n\n Kaya Plus (1) 1\n\n BambuUp (1) 1\n\n 0 2 4 6\n Views\n\n\n\n\nTraffic to PR Newswire Properties\n\nType of Views Views\n Type Views\n\n\n Desktop Views 952\n\n\n Mobile/Tablet Views 13\n\n\n Total Views on PR Newswire Properties 965\n\n\n\n\n Desktop Views\n Mobile/Tablet Views\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 30 of 38\n\nExternal Traffic Sources\nUnderstand how viewers found your release.\n\n Source Type Source Instances\n\n\n Direct 854\n\n\n Direct Direct 854\n\n\n \uf107 Search Engine (2) 21\n\n\n Search Engine Google 20\n\n\n Search Engine Sogou 1\n\n\n \uf107 Social Media (1) 2\n\n\n Social Media X 2 Direct\n Search Engine\n \uf107 PR Newswire Properties (1) 88 Social Media\n PR Newswire Properties\n PR Newswire Properties prnewswire.com 88\n\n\n Total 965\n\n\n\n\nMultimedia Views\n\nImage Views & Hits\n\n Image Image Archive Views Web Crawler Hits Total\n\n\n View Image 99 2,562 2,661\n\n\n\n\n Total 99 2,562 2,661\n\n\n* Image views are the total number of human views of the image as it appeared on this release. Web Crawler Hits are the number of spider and bot hits to the image and are\ncumulative from the original date of distribution.\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 31 of 38\n\n\n\nAudience\n\n\n\nOverview\n VIEWS FROM IDENTIFIED AUDIENCES 62 AP & INFLUENCER LIST RECIPIENTS 900\n\n Media Views 62 Wire Distribution / AP Outlets 900\n\n\n\n\nAudience Summary\n\n\nMedia Demographics\nA break down of the industries covered, the media types and the locations of the journalists & bloggers accessing your release on PR\nNewswire for Journalists.\n\n\n\nTop Industries Top Media Types Top Locations\n 40 25\n\n\n\n 20\n 30\n\n\n 15\n\n\n 20\n 10\n\n\n\n 10 5\n\n\n\n 0\n 0\n Web/On-Line Service\n\n Other\n Freelance/Writer\n Newspaper\n\n Blogger\n Media\n Public Issues\n Financial Services\n Technology\n\n\n\n\n Healthcare\n\n\n\n\n United States\n India Canada\n Pakistan\n Malaysia\n The rest\n\n\n\n\nGeo-segmentation\nSee where views of your release originated. Hover over map to see totals by location.\nSelect a\nregion:\n World View\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 32 of 38\n >0\n 1 - 10\n 10 - 30\n 30 - 100\n 100 - 300\n 300 - 1 000\n > 1 000\n\n\n\n\n >0\n 1 - 10\n 10 - 30\n 30 - 100\n 100 - 300\n 300 - 1 000\n > 1 000\n\n\n\n\n >0\n 1 - 10\n 10 - 30\n 30 - 100\n 100 - 300\n 300 - 1 000\n > 1 000\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 33 of 38\n\n\n\n\n >0\n 1 - 10\n 10 - 30\n 30 - 100\n 100 - 300\n 300 - 1 000\n > 1 000\n\n\n\n\n >0\n 1 - 10\n 10 - 30\n 30 - 100\n 100 - 300\n 300 - 1 000\n > 1 000\n\n\n\n\n >0\n 1 - 10\n 10 - 30\n 30 - 100\n 100 - 300\n 300 - 1 000\n > 1 000\n\n\n\n\nAudience Details\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 34 of 38\nMedia Views\nSee the details of each media outlet from PR Newswire for Journalists that viewed your release.\n\n Views\n Outlet Industry Source Type Location \ue114\n\n Accion Labs Auto, Entertainment, Environment Blogger, Radio Greece 1\n\n\n Randall-Reilly Publishing Transportation Trade Periodicals United 1\n Co. States\n\n\n metatech.pk Technology Blogger, Freelance/Writer Pakistan 1\n\n\n MNM Services Consumer Products, Features, Financial Services, General Business, Blogger, Freelance/Writer, Web/On-Line United 1\n Public Issues, Technology Service States\n\n\n naradnewsusa.com Auto, Consumer Products, Entertainment, Features, Financial Services, Blogger, Freelance/Writer India 1\n Healthcare, Media, Public Issues, Sports, Technology, Travel\n\n\n National News Technology Freelance/Writer, Trade Periodicals United 1\n Syndicate States\n\n\n Nawae Pakistan Public Issues Web/On-Line Service Pakistan 1\n\n\n New York 1 News Other Television United 1\n States\n\n\n News Aktuell Other Wire Service Switzerland 1\n\n\n NewsRise Auto, Broadcast, Consumer Products, Energy, Entertainment, Freelance/Writer, Newspaper, Radio, Wire Malaysia 1\n Environment, Features, Financial Services, General Business, Service\n Healthcare, Heavy Industry, Media, Other, Public Issues, Sports,\n Technology, Transportation, Travel\n\n\n NewsRx Auto, Broadcast, Consumer Products, Energy, Entertainment, Web/On-Line Service United 1\n Environment, Features, Financial Services, General Business, States\n Healthcare, Heavy Industry, Media, Other, Public Issues, Sports,\n Technology, Transportation, Travel\n\n\n Next Dimension Story Other Other United 1\n Kingdom\n\n\n Okinawa Marine Broadcast, Environment, Features, Financial Services, Media, Public Freelance/Writer, Newspaper, Web/On-Line Japan 1\n Issues, Technology, Transportation, Travel Service, Wire Service\n\n\n PR Technology Other Malaysia 1\n\n\n Record Gazette Entertainment, General Business, Media, Public Issues Newspaper United 1\n States\n\n\n marketnesia Financial Services Freelance/Writer, Newspaper Ireland 1\n\n\n Rethinking65 Consumer Products, Financial Services, Healthcare, Media, Public Trade Periodicals United 1\n Issues, Technology States\n\n\n Rhythm of Expression, Energy, Environment, Financial Services, Healthcare, Public Issues, Freelance/Writer United 1\n LLC Technology, Travel States\n\n\n Scot Scoop Features Newspaper United 1\n States\n\n\n self Features, Financial Services, General Business, Media, Other, Travel Freelance/Writer United 1\n States\n\n\n SingularityNET Features, Financial Services, Healthcare, Technology Blogger United 1\n States\n\n\n Soap Opera Network / Broadcast, Entertainment, Features, Media, Technology, Travel Blogger, Freelance/Writer, Other, Television United 1\n ErrolLewis.com States\n\n\n speniz Auto Blogger United 1\n States\n\n\n STEWAWEL News & Auto, Broadcast, Consumer Products, Energy, Entertainment, Radio, Television, Web/On-Line Service, Wire United 1\n Information Environment, Features, Financial Services, General Business, Service States\n Healthcare, Heavy Industry, Media, Other, Public Issues, Sports,\n Technology, Transportation, Travel\n\n\n The Bhawana Times Entertainment, Heavy Industry, Media, Other, Sports Blogger, Newspaper Pakistan 1\n\n\n The St. Louis Riverfront Public Issues Freelance/Writer, Newspaper United 1\n Times States\n\n\n Times of News 24x7 Healthcare Blogger, Other, Web/On-Line Service India 1\n\n\n Total 62\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 35 of 38\n Views\nOutlet Industry Source Type Location \ue114\nWJET/WFXP/Nexstar Auto, Broadcast, Consumer Products, Energy, Entertainment, Blogger, Newspaper, Television United 1\nBroadcasting Environment, Financial Services, General Business, Healthcare, Media, States\n Public Issues, Sports, Technology, Transportation, Travel\n\n\nWSAZ Financial Services Television United 1\n States\n\n\nMergermarket Financial Services Web/On-Line Service United 1\n States\n\n\nLegal Support World Other Blogger, Freelance/Writer United 1\n States\n\n\nAdams Editorial Services Consumer Products, Environment, Healthcare, Heavy Industry, Other, Freelance/Writer, Trade Periodicals United 1\n Technology States\n\n\nDelion Environment, Financial Services, General Business, Other, Technology Blogger, Newspaper Canada 1\n\n\nAkyab Auto, Broadcast, Consumer Products, Energy, Entertainment, Blogger Canada 1\n Environment, Features, Financial Services, General Business,\n Healthcare, Heavy Industry, Media, Other, Public Issues, Sports,\n Technology, Transportation, Travel\n\n\nArgaam Auto, Energy, Financial Services, General Business, Heavy Industry Freelance/Writer, Newspaper United 1\n States\n\n\nAtmosEsp Entertainment, Media Other United 1\n States\n\n\nCBC Auto, Broadcast, Consumer Products, Energy, Entertainment, Radio Canada 1\n Environment, Features, Financial Services, General Business,\n Healthcare, Heavy Industry, Media, Other, Public Issues, Sports,\n Technology, Transportation, Travel\n\n\nCHANTELLEW Financial Services, General Business, Public Issues Blogger Monaco 1\n\n\ncision Auto Blogger United 1\n States\n\n\nCISION Sports, Technology Newspaper India 1\n\n\nCision (PR Newswire) Auto, Broadcast, Consumer Products, Energy, Entertainment, Blogger, Consumer Periodicals, United 1\n Environment, Features, Financial Services, General Business, Freelance/Writer, Newspaper, Other, Radio, States\n Healthcare, Heavy Industry, Media, Other, Public Issues, Sports, Television, Trade Periodicals, Web/On-Line\n Technology, Transportation, Travel Service, Wire Service\n\n\nCNBC-TV18 Auto, Broadcast, Consumer Products, Energy, Entertainment, Web/On-Line Service India 1\n Environment, Features, Financial Services, General Business,\n Healthcare, Heavy Industry, Media, Other, Public Issues, Sports,\n Technology, Transportation, Travel\n\n\nCogecoTV Auto, Broadcast, Consumer Products, Energy, Entertainment, Television Canada 1\n Environment, Features, Financial Services, General Business,\n Healthcare, Heavy Industry, Media, Other, Public Issues, Sports,\n Technology, Transportation, Travel\n\n\nCognizant Auto, General Business, Technology Blogger, Freelance/Writer India 1\n\n\nCutter Consortium, Data Financial Services, Healthcare, Technology Blogger, Freelance/Writer, Trade Periodicals, United 1\nAnalytics &amp; Web/On-Line Service States\nDigital Technologies\nAdvisor\n\n\nDaily News Other Other South 1\n Africa\n\n\nEconomic Review Auto, Energy, Features, Financial Services, Media, Public Issues, Sports Freelance/Writer, Newspaper, Trade Pakistan 1\n Periodicals\n\n\nKrazzyMag Auto, Entertainment, Financial Services, Healthcare, Media, Sports, Blogger, Other, Web/On-Line Service India 1\n Technology, Travel\n\n\nFeather River Bulletin Other Newspaper United 1\n States\n\n\nFilgizmo Auto, Consumer Products, Energy, Financial Services, Heavy Industry, Blogger Philippines 1\n Technology, Transportation\n\n\nForkLog Media, Technology Freelance/Writer, Newspaper Russia 1\n\n\nFreelancer Entertainment, Features, Healthcare Freelance/Writer, Newspaper United 1\n States\n\n\nTotal 62\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 36 of 38\n Views\nOutlet Industry Source Type Location \ue114\n\nFreelancer Other Trade Periodicals United 1\n States\n\n\nGaceta UNAM Environment, Features, Healthcare, Media, Public Issues, Sports, Travel Newspaper, Web/On-Line Service Mexico 1\n\n\nGHEP, Rock and Art Energy, Environment, Features, Healthcare, Media, Public Issues, Freelance/Writer, Newspaper, Other Canada 1\nCulture magazine, Roots Technology\nMusic....\n\n\nheart & soul Entertainment, Healthcare, Travel Consumer Periodicals, Radio, Web/On-Line United 1\n Service States\n\n\nHouston Chronicle Features Newspaper United 1\n States\n\n\nInvestkraft Financial Services Blogger India 1\n\n\nJacksonville Journal- Auto, Consumer Products, Energy, Entertainment, Environment, Newspaper United 1\nCourier Features, General Business, Healthcare, Media, Other, Public Issues, States\n Technology, Transportation\n\n\nJyquan Stewart Broadcast, Media, Public Issues Other United 1\n States\n\n\nKingsport Times-New Other Newspaper United 1\n States\n\n\nYoung Voices Consumer Products, Healthcare, Public Issues Newspaper United 1\n States\n\n\nTotal 62\n\n\n\n\n Associated Press Outlets\n PR Newswire\u2019s wire newslines include targeted distribution to the Associated Press, an essential global news network that\n delivers content to an extensive set of media platforms and formats. The list below represents the outlets you reach via this\n partnership.\n\n Outlet Name City State Location Type Audience\n\n\n C-SPAN Washington DC US Television 86,200,000 Subscribers\n\n\n Scribd, Inc. San Francisco CA US Aggregator 43,531,670 Visitors per Month\n\n\n FoxNews.com New York NY US Online 32,516,438 Visitors per Month\n\n\n CBS News Radio New York NY US Radio 30,000,000 Broadcast Audience\n\n\n New York Times Digital New York NY US Newspaper 29,886,442 Visitors per Month\n\n\n Apple Inc. Cupertino CA US Organization/Company 29,709,459 Visitors per Month\n\n\n CNBC.com Englewood Cliffs NJ US Online 26,089,260 Visitors per Month\n\n\n CBSnews.com New York NY US Online 26,080,671 Visitors per Month\n\n\n abcnews.com New York NY US Online 24,167,779 Visitors per Month\n\n\n U.S. News & World Report Washington DC US Magazine 23,945,529 Visitors per Month\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 37 of 38\n\n\n\nEngagement\n\n\n\nOverview\n\nTOTAL ENGAGEMENT ACTIONS 5\n\nClick-throughs 5\n\n\nEngagement Timeline\nSee when your audience engaged with your release.\n 10\n\n\n 5\n\n 4\n\n\n\n 2\n\n\n\n 1\n\n 5\n\n\n 0.4\n\n\n\n 0.2\n\n\n\n 0\n 2024-10-28\n\n\n Cumulative Click-throughs Shares Downloads\n\n\n\n\nEngagement Details\nA break down of click-throughs, shares and other engagement actions.\n\nClick-throughs\nThe number of times your release sent visitors to the pages you linked to\n\n URL Click-throughs\n\n\n https://www.ampiosecuritiessettlement.com/ 5\n\n\n Total 5\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 99-6 filed 12/23/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 38 of 38\n\n About Cision PR Newswire Contact Terms of Use Privacy Blog\n\n\n Copyright \u00a9 2024 Cision US Inc., 300 S Riverside Plaza, Chicago, IL 60606. View our Privacy Policy.\n\f","ocr_status":1,"date_upload":"2026-06-24T12:58:47.256288-07:00","document_number":"99","attachment_number":6,"pacer_doc_id":"039011687854","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":2,"description":"Exhibit F - Press Release","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2025-01-09T01:57:40.343319-08:00","date_modified":"2026-06-24T12:55:20.747209-07:00","date_filed":"2024-12-23","time_filed":null,"entry_number":99,"recap_sequence_number":"2024-12-23.001","pacer_sequence_number":283,"description":"DECLARATION of Anne-Marie Marra of Simpluris Regarding Notice and Settlement Administration and regarding Order on Motion for Order 97 by Plaintiffs Tao Wang, SynWorld Technologies Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Postcard Notice, # 2 Exhibit B - Long Form Notice, # 3 Exhibit C - Claim Form, # 4 Exhibit D - Nominee Notice Packet, # 5 Exhibit E - Publication Notice, # 6 Exhibit F - Press Release)(Wilson, James) (Entered: 12/23/2024)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/413029176/","id":413029176,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/64904094/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/426586667/","id":426586667,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/64904094/98/wang-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc/","date_created":"2025-01-09T01:57:40.328697-08:00","date_modified":"2026-06-24T12:55:20.700335-07:00","sha1":"e91850ccd5ffd7fc47471884611f702a4556db85","page_count":8,"file_size":1159267,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.98.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cod.217587/gov.uscourts.cod.217587.98.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 98 filed 10/03/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 1 of 8\n\n\n\n\n IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO\n\n TAO WANG and SYNWORLD\n TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION,\n Individually and on Behalf of All Others Case No.: 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-MEH\n Similarly Situated,,\n DECLARATION OF ANNE-MARIE\n Plaintiff, MARRA OF SIMPLURIS REGARDING\n NOTICE AND SETTLEMENT\n v. ADMINISTRATION\n AMPIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.\n MICHAEL A. MARTINO,\n MICHAEL MACALUSO,\n HOLLI CHEREVKA,\n DAN STOKELY\n DAVID BAR-OR,\n PHILIP H. COELHO, and\n RICHARD B. GILES\n\n Defendants.\n\n\n\n I, ANNE-MARIE MARRA, declare as follows:\n\n 1. I am employed as a Program Manager by Simpluris, Inc. (\u201cSimpluris\u201d), the\n\nclaims administrator in the above-entitled action. Our corporate office address is 3194-C\n\nAirport Loop Dr., Costa Mesa, CA 92626. I am over twenty-one years of age and authorized to\n\nmake this declaration on behalf of Simpluris and myself. I have personal knowledge of the\n\ninformation set forth herein.\n\n 2. Simpluris is a class action administrator located in Costa Mesa, California.\n\nEstablished in 2007, Simpluris has administered over 9,000 cases nationwide, with class sizes\n\nranging from a few hundred to over one million class members. Representative cases include:\n\nMyart v. AutoZone, Inc. and Aceves v. Autozone, Inc. (US District Court, CA Central Division)\n\n(208,050 class members), Diaz v. SeaWorld (Superior Court of the State of California)\n\n(1,281,123 class members), and Woods v. Vector Marketing (US District Court, Northern\n\nDistrict of California) (194,500 class members).\n\n Page 1 of 2\n DECLARATION OF ANNE-MARIE MARRA OF SIMPLURIS\n REGARDING CAFA NOTIFICATION\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 98 filed 10/03/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 2 of 8\n\n\n\n\n CAFA NOTIFICATION\n\n 3. On May 22, 2024, pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 and 28\n\nU.S.C.A. \u00a7 1715, Simpluris completed electronic and physical mailings that informed the\n\nappropriate state and federal Attorneys General about the Settlement. Attached hereto as Exhibit\n\nA is a true and correct copy of the letter sent to the Attorneys General. The list of recipients\n\nwith their method of delivery is attached hereto as Exhibit B.\n\n I declare under penalty of perjury that the above is true and correct and that this\n\nDeclaration was executed this 3rd day of June 2024, in Seattle, Washington.\n\n\n __/s/ Anne-Marie Marra_______________\n ANNE-MARIE MARRA\n\n\n\n\n Page 2 of 2\n DECLARATION OF ANNE-MARIE MARRA OF SIMPLURIS\n REGARDING CAFA NOTIFICATION\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 98 filed 10/03/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 3 of 8\n\n\n\n\n EXHIBIT A\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 98 filed 10/03/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 4 of 8\n\n\n\n\nDate: May 22, 2024\nRE: Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 1715\n\nDear Mr./Madam Attorney General:\n\nSimpluris has been retained by Defendant Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (\u201cAmpio\u201d) in a proposed class action lawsuit\nentitled Wang et al v. Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al, Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-MEH (the \u201cAction\u201d) to\nprovide notices required under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005. The Action is pending before the Honorable\nWilliam J. Martinez in the United States District Court, District of Colorado.\n\nIn compliance with Section 1715 of the Class Action Fairness Act, 28 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a7 1332(d), 1453, and 1711\u20131715 (CAFA),\nthis letter is to advise you that a Motion for entry of an order for Preliminary Approval was filed. The Court has not yet\nruled on the motion or set a hearing date.\n\nThe parties to the above-referenced class action have reached a proposed class settlement regarding individuals who\npurchased or otherwise acquired Ampio common stock between December 29, 2020, and August 2, 2022, inclusive, who\nare alleging that the Defendants disseminated materially false and misleading information to the investing public related to\nAmpio\u2019s commercial drug candidate, Ampion\u00ae resulting in an artificial inflation of the price of Ampio common stock\nduring the putative Class Period, in violation of the federal securities laws. The Defendants deny any and all wrongdoing,\ndeny any liability to Lead Plaintiff or the proposed settlement class, and deny that Lead Plaintiff and the proposed class\nmembers have suffered any damages attributable to the Defendants\u2019 actions.\n\nIn compliance with Section 1715(b), the documents referenced below are available on the website linked here:\nhttps://transfer.simpluris.com/link/1sgIILalqezmJM6JD5M83A.\n\n 1. 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 1715(b)(1) \u2013 Complaint and Related Materials: A copy of the original Complaint filed in the Action\n as well as the Amended Complaint are available on the website as \u201cEx. A \u2013 Complaint\u201d and \u201cEx. B \u2013 Amended\n Complaint\u201d respectively.\n 2. 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 1715(b)(3) \u2013 Notification to Class Members: A copy of the Postcard Notice is available on the website\n as \u201cEx. C - Postcard Notice\u201d as well as the Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action and Proof\n of Claim and Release Form entitled \u201cEx. D \u2013 Long Form Notice\u201d and \u201cEx. E \u2013 Proof of Claim Form\u201d respectively.\n A copy of the Summary Notice is available on the website as \u201cEx. F \u2013 Summary Notice.\u201d\n 3. 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 1715(b)(4) \u2013 Proposed Class Action Settlement: A copy of the parties\u2019 Stipulation and Agreement\n of Settlement is available on the website as \u201cEx. G \u2013 Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement.\u201d A copy of the\n Proposed Preliminary Approval Order is available on the website as \u201cEx. H \u2013 [Proposed] Preliminary Approval\n Order.\u201d\n 4. 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 1715(b)(5) \u2013 Any Settlement or Other Agreement: As of the date of this letter, no other settlement\n or agreement has been entered into by the parties to this Action. The parties have executed a confidential\n supplemental agreement with details on Defendants\u2019 termination rights in the event that a certain percentage of\n putative class members opt out of the settlement.\n 5. 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 1715(b)(6) \u2013 Final Judgment: As of the date of this letter, no Final Judgment has been issued by the\n Court. However, a copy of the Proposed Final Order and Judgment is available on the website as \u201cEx. I \u2013 [Proposed]\n Final Order and Judgment.\u201d\n\n\n\n\n 3194-C Airport Loop Drive, Costa Mesa, CA 92626\n www.simpluris.com | 1 (800) 779 - 2104\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 98 filed 10/03/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 5 of 8\n\n\n\n\nAs of the date of this letter, the Court has not yet granted preliminary approval or set a date for any hearing. It is not\ncurrently feasible to identify the Class Members who reside in each state at this time, and therefore Defendants cannot\nfeasibly estimate the proportionate share of the claims of such members to the entire settlement.\n\nMaterials filed in this action can be obtained through PACER, which is accessible at https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/file-\ncase/court-cmecf-lookup. If for any reason, you believe the enclosed information does not fully comply with Section 1715,\nplease contact the Counsel for Defendant Ampio Pharmaceuticals identified below, to address any concerns or questions\nthat you may have. For your convenience, we have provided the contact information for both parties and the Settlement\nAdministrator below.\n\n Settlement Administrator: Class Counsel: Defense Counsel:\n James M. Wilson, Jr. Patrick G. Compton\n Simpluris, Inc.\n FARUQI & FARUQI, LLP BALLARD SPAHR, LLP\n 3194 Airport Loop Dr, Ste C\n 685 Third Ave, 26th Fl 1225 17th St, Ste 2300\n Costa Mesa, CA 92626\n New York, NY 10017 Denver, CO 80202\n\nRegards,\nAnne-Marie Marra\nProgram Manager, Client Services\n\n\n\n\n 3194-C Airport Loop Drive, Costa Mesa, CA 92626\n www.simpluris.com | 1 (800) 779 - 2104\n\fCase No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 98 filed 10/03/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 6 of 8\n\n\n\n\n EXHIBIT B\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 98 filed 10/03/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 7 of 8\n\n\n List of Recipients of CAFA Notice\n\nOffice Name Individual Name Address 1 Address 2 City State Zip Method\nOffice of the Attorney General Treg Taylor 1031 West 4th Avenue, Suite 200 Anchorage AK 99501-1994 Email\nOffice of the Attorney General Steve Marshall 501 Washington Avenue P.O. Box 300152 Montgomery AL 36130-0152 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Tim Griffin 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock AR 72201-2610 Mail\nAttorney General's Office Fainu'ulelei Falefatu Ala'ilima-Utu American Samoa Gov't, Exec. Ofc. Bldg. Utulei, Territory of American Samoa Pago Pago AS 96799 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Kris Mayes 2005 N. Central Avenue Phoenix AZ 85004-2926 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Rob Bonta 1300 I Street, Suite 1740 Sacramento CA 95814 Mail\n CAFA Coordinator Office of the Attorney General, Consumer Protection Section 455 Golden Gate Ave., Suite 11000 San Francisco CA 94102 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Phil Weiser Ralph L Carr Colorado Judicial Center 1300 Broadway, 10th Floor Denver CO 80203 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General William Tong 165 Capital Avenue Hartford CT 06106 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Merrick Garland U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington DC 20530-0001 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Brian Schwalb 400 6th Street NW Washington DC 20001 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Kathy Jennings Carvel State Office Bldg 820 N. French Street Wilmington DE 19801 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Ashley Moody The Capitol PL 01 Tallahassee FL 32399-1050 Email\nOffice of the Attorney General Chris Carr 40 Capitol Square SW Atlanta GA 30334-1300 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Douglas Moylan ITC Building 590 S Marine Corps Drive, Ste. 706 Tamuning GU 96913 Mail\nDepartment of the Attorney General Anne E. Lopez 425 Queen St Honolulu HI 96813-2903 Mail\nIowa Attorney General Brenna Bird Hoover State Office Bldg 1305 E.Walnut St. Des Moines IA 50319 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Ra\u00fal Labrador 700 W. Jefferson Street, Ste. 210 PO Box 83720 Boise ID 83720-1000 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Jasmine Ramos-Rojas James R. Thompson Center 100 W Randolph St Chicago IL 60601 Email\nIndiana Attorney General's Office Todd Rokita Indiana Government Center South 302 W. Washington Street, 5th Floor Indianapolis IN 46204 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Kris Kobach 120 SW 10th Avenue, 2nd Floor Topeka KS 66612-1597 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Daniel Cameron 700 Capitol Avenue Capitol Building, Suite 118 Frankfort KY 40601 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Jeff Landry P.O. Box 94095 Baton Rouge LA 70804-4095 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Andrea Campbell ATTN: CAFA Coordinator/General Counsel's Office One Ashburton Place Boston MA 02108 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Anthony G. Brown 200 St. Paul Place Baltimore MD 21202-2202 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Aaron Frey State House Station 6 Augusta ME 04333 Mail\nDepartment of the Attorney General Dana Nessel 525 W. Ottawa Street P.O. Box 30212 Lansing MI 48909-0212 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Keith Ellison Suite 102, State Capital 75 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd. St. Paul MN 55155 Mail\nMissouri Attorney General's Office Andrew Bailey Supreme Ct Bldg. 207 W. High Street Jefferson City MO 65101 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Edward Manibusan Administration Building P.O. Box 10007 Saipan MP 96950-8907 Mail\nMS Attorney General's Office Lynn Fitch Department of Justice P.O. Box 220 Jackson MS 39205 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Austin Knudsen Justice Bldg. 215 N. Sanders Helena MT 59620-1401 Mail\nAttorney General's Office Josh Stein 9001 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699-6400 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Drew Wrigley State Capitol 600 E. Boulevard Ave. Bismarck ND 58505-0040 Mail\nNebraska Attorney General Mike Hilgers State Capitol PO Box 98920 Lincoln NE 68509-8920 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General John Formella 33 Capitol St. Concord NH 03301 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Matthew J. Platkin Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex 25 Market Street, P.O. Box 080 Trenton NJ 08625 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Raul Torrez PO Drawer 1508 Santa Fe NM 87504-1508 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Aaron D. Ford Old Supreme Ct. Bldg. 100 N. Carson St. Carson City NV 89701 Email\nOffice of the Attorney General Letitia James CAFA Coordinator, Office of the Attorney General 28 Liberty Street, 15th Floor New York NY 10005 Email\nOffice of the Attorney General Dave Yost State Office Tower 30 E. Broad Street, 14th Floor Columbus OH 43215 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Gentner Drummond 313 NE 21st Street Oklahoma City OK 73105 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Ellen F. Rosenblum Justice Bldg. 1162 Court Street NE Salem OR 97301 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Michelle A. Henry Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General 16th Floor, Strawberry Square Harrisburg PA 17120 Mail\nPR Department of Justice Domingo Emanuelli Hern\u00e1ndez P.O. Box 9020192 San Juan PR 00902-0192 Mail\n\f Case No. 1:22-cv-02105-WJM-CYC Document 98 filed 10/03/24 USDC Colorado\n pg 8 of 8\n\n\n List of Recipients of CAFA Notice\n\nOffice Name Individual Name Address 1 Address 2 City State Zip Method\nOffice of the Attorney General Peter F. Neronha 150 S. Main Street Providence RI 02903 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Alan Wilson Rembert C. Dennis Office Bldg. P.O. Box 11549 Columbia SC 29211-1549 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Marty Jackley 1302 E. Highway 14, Suite 1 Pierre SD 57501-8501 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti 425 5th Avenue North Nashville TN 37243 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Ken Paxton Capitol Station P.O. Box 12548 Austin TX 78711-2548 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Sean Reyes Utah State Capitol Complex 350 North State Street, Suite 230 Salt Lake City UT 84114-2320 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Jason Miyares 202 North Ninth Street Richmond VA 23219 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Carol Thomas-Jacobs 34-38 Kronprindsens Gade GERS Building, 2nd Floor St Thomas VI 00802 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Charity R. Clark 109 State St Montpelier VT 05609-1001 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Bob Ferguson 1125 Washington Street SE P.O. Box 40100 Olympia WA 98504-0100 Email\nOffice of the Attorney General Joshua Kaul State Capitol, Room 114 East P.O. Box 7857 Madison WI 53707-7857 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Patrick Morrisey State Capitol 1900 Kanawha Blvd. E. Charleston WV 25305 Mail\nOffice of the Attorney General Bridget Hill 109 State Capitol 200 W. 24th St. Cheyenne WY 82002 Mail\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2025-08-12T06:43:42.331204-07:00","document_number":"98","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"039011523645","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2025-01-09T01:57:40.310454-08:00","date_modified":"2026-06-24T12:55:20.646085-07:00","date_filed":"2024-10-03","time_filed":null,"entry_number":98,"recap_sequence_number":"2024-10-03.001","pacer_sequence_number":281,"description":"DECLARATION of Anne-Marie Marra of Simpluris Regarding Notice and Settlement Administration by Defendants Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Michael A. Martino. (Compton, Patrick) (Entered: 10/03/2024)","tags":[]}],"entries_total":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/?count=on&docket=64904094&page_size=40"}