Case 2:21-cv-01004-GMN-BNW Document 101 Filed 12/12/24 Page 1 of 3 1 HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC Robert Hernquist, Nevada Bar No. 10616 2 James Kohl, Nevada Bar No. 5692 3 rwh@h2law.com; jak@h2law.com Wells Fargo Tower, Suite 1000 4 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway Las Vegas, Nevada 89169-5980 5 Telephone: (702) 257-1483 Facsimile: (702) 567-1568 6 KAPLAN RICE LLP 7 Howard J. Kaplan, Admitted Pro Hac Vice Michelle A. Rice, Admitted Pro Hac Vice 8 142 W. 57th Street, Suite 4A 9 New York, New York 10019 Attorneys for Intervenor Special Litigation 10 Committee of CleanSpark, Inc. HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 13 IN RE CLEANSPARK, INC. Case No. 2:21-cv-01004-GMN-BNW 14 DERIVATIVE LITIGATION, 15 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND This Document Relates to: ORDER OF DISMISSAL 16 ALL ACTIONS (WITH PREJUDICE) 17 Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs Andrea Ciceri 18 and Mark Perna (“Plaintiffs”), by and through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby 19 dismiss the above-captioned consolidated matter in its entirety, with prejudice as to all claims, 20 causes of action and parties and with each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 21 This dismissal includes the dismissal of all claims asserted in the following actions, which 22 have been consolidated into this action: 23 24  Andrea Ciceri, derivatively on behalf of CleanSpark, Inc. v. Zachary Bradford, Lori Love, Matthew Schutz, Roger Beynon, Larry McNeill and Tom Wood and Nominal 25 Defendant CleanSpark, Inc., Case No. 2:21-cv-01004, which was filed on May 26, 2021; and 26  Mark Perna, derivatively on behalf of CleanSpark, Inc. v. Zachary Bradford, Lori 27 Love, Matthew Schutz, Roger Beynon, Larry McNeill and Tom Wood and Nominal Defendant CleanSpark, Inc., Case No. 2:21-cv-01181, which was filed on June 22, 28 2021. 1 Case 2:21-cv-01004-GMN-BNW Document 101 Filed 12/12/24 Page 2 of 3 1 The dismissal is not intended to, and does not, dismiss or compromise the claims in the 2 consolidated derivative action pending in the Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County, 3 Nevada: 4  In re CleanSpark Inc. Derivative Litigation, Case No. A-23-866051-B (Dept. 13) (“Nevada State Derivative Action”). 5 Notice of this voluntary dismissal is not required under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23.1(c) because 6 neither Plaintiffs nor Plaintiffs’ counsel have received or will receive any compensation for this 7 dismissal, and because other shareholders who are plaintiffs in the Nevada State Derivative 8 Action, which remains pending, make substantially similar claims as the Plaintiffs. The SLC 9 takes no position on this issue. 10 HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED: 11 WILK AUSLANDER LLP THE BROWN LAW FIRM, P.C. 12 13 By: /s/ Aari Itzkowitz By: /s/ Timothy Brown Jay S. Auslander (pro hac vice) Timothy Brown (pro hac vice) 14 Natalie Shkolnik (pro hac vice) 767 Third Avenue, Suite 2501 Aari Itzkowitz (pro hac vice) New York, NY 10017 15 Michael Van Riper (pro hac vice) 825 Eighth Avenue, Ste. 2900 Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 16 New York, New York 10019 Patrick R. Leverty 17 Mark J. Connot, Nevada Bar No. 10010 LEVERTY & ASSOCIATES LAW CHTD. Colleen E. McCarty, Nevada Bar No. 13186 Reno Gould House 18 FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP 832 Willow Street 19 1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Ste. 700 Reno, NV 89502 Las Vegas, Nevada 89135 20 Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs Counsel for Defendants 21 THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A. HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC Phillip Kim (pro hac vice) 22 275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor By: /s/ Robert Hernquist New York, NY 10016 23 Robert Hernquist, Nevada Bar No. 10616 Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs James Kohl, Nevada Bar No. 5692 24 KAPLAN RICE LLP 25 Howard J. Kaplan, Admitted Pro Hac Vice 26 Michelle A. Rice, Admitted Pro Hac Vice 27 Attorneys for Intervenor Special Litigation Committee of CleanSpark, Inc. 28 2 Case 2:21-cv-01004-GMN-BNW Document 101 Filed 12/12/24 Page 3 of 3