{"cached_at":"2026-10-26T10:49:01.133724+00:00","cl_docket_id":"67081032","docket":{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67081032/","id":67081032,"court":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/courts/nvd/","court_id":"nvd","original_court_info":null,"idb_data":null,"clusters":[],"audio_files":[],"assigned_to":null,"referred_to":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/people/9412/","bankruptcy_information":null,"absolute_url":"/docket/67081032/atanasoff-v-bradford/","date_created":"2023-03-23T12:20:22.241029-07:00","date_modified":"2025-05-13T17:04:47.723274-07:00","source":1,"appeal_from_str":"","assigned_to_str":"Anne R. Traum","referred_to_str":"Brenda Weksler","panel_str":"","date_last_index":"2023-03-30T05:09:39.119861-07:00","date_cert_granted":null,"date_cert_denied":null,"date_argued":null,"date_reargued":null,"date_reargument_denied":null,"date_filed":"2023-03-07","date_terminated":"2023-06-29","date_last_filing":"2023-10-05","case_name_short":"Atanasoff","case_name":"Atanasoff v. Bradford","case_name_full":"","slug":"atanasoff-v-bradford","docket_number":"2:23-cv-00358","docket_number_core":"2300358","docket_number_raw":"2:23-cv-00358","docket_number_source":0,"federal_dn_office_code":"2","federal_dn_case_type":"cv","federal_dn_judge_initials_assigned":"ART","federal_dn_judge_initials_referred":"BNW","federal_defendant_number":null,"pacer_case_id":"161148","cause":"28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal","nature_of_suit":"Stockholders Suits","jury_demand":"","jurisdiction_type":"","appellate_fee_status":"","appellate_case_type_information":"","mdl_status":"","filepath_ia":"","filepath_ia_json":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"ia_needs_upload":true,"ia_date_first_change":"2023-03-23T12:20:22.239158-07:00","date_blocked":null,"blocked":false,"appeal_from":null,"parent_docket":null,"tags":[],"panel":[]},"parties":[],"entries":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/366980871/","id":366980871,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67081032/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/374129967/","id":374129967,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67081032/38/atanasoff-v-bradford/","date_created":"2023-10-05T14:56:53.087557-07:00","date_modified":"2023-10-05T14:56:53.090069-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"38","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"115010153619","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Mail Returned","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2023-10-05T14:56:53.069188-07:00","date_modified":"2023-10-05T14:56:53.075201-07:00","date_filed":"2023-10-05","time_filed":"14:24:19","entry_number":38,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-10-05.001","pacer_sequence_number":139,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/348127857/","id":348127857,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67081032/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/354561279/","id":354561279,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67081032/37/atanasoff-v-bradford/","date_created":"2023-06-30T10:23:40.323712-07:00","date_modified":"2024-11-19T06:43:48.966415-08:00","sha1":"2cd246c097d3ec35297547d8f787bfe0743de1cc","page_count":2,"file_size":93025,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.nvd.161148/gov.uscourts.nvd.161148.37.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.nvd.161148/gov.uscourts.nvd.161148.37.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":" Case 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW Document 37 Filed 06/29/23 Page 1 of 2\n\n\n\n 1\n\n 2\n UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n 3\n DISTRICT OF NEVADA\n 4\n ERIC ATANASOFF, Derivatively on Case No. 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW\n 5 behalf of Nominal Defendant\n CleanSpark, Inc., ORDER\n 6\n Plaintiff,\n 7 v.\n 8 ZACHARY K. BRADFORD, S.\n MATTHEW SCHULTZ, LARRY\n 9 MCNEIL, THOMAS L. WOOD, and\n ROGER P. BEYNON,\n10\n Defendants,\n11\n and\n12\n CLEANSPARK INC.,\n13\n Nominal Defendant.\n14\n\n15\n\n16\n\n17 On June 28, 2023, Defendant S. Mathew Shultz (\u201cShultz\u201d) withdrew his\n18 Petition for Removal to Federal Court (ECF No. 1), filed on March 7, 2023. (ECF\n19 No. 36). Plaintiff Eric Atanasoff (\u201cAtanasoff\u201d), derivatively on behalf of CleanSpark,\n20 Inc. (\u201cCleanSpark\u201d) previously filed a Motion to Remand. (ECF No. 11).\n21 The Court therefore hereby remands this case to the Clark County District\n22 Court for all further proceedings.\n23 //\n24 //\n25 //\n26 //\n27 //\n28 //\n\n\n 1\n\f Case 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW Document 37 Filed 06/29/23 Page 2 of 2\n\n\n\n 1 Accordingly, it is further ordered that the following outstanding motions\n\n 2 are moot: Motion to Consolidate (ECF No. 10); Motion to Remand (ECF No. 11);\n\n 3 Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 26); Motion to Stay (ECF No. 27); Motion for Leave to\n\n 4 File Document (ECF No. 31); Second Motion for Leave to File Document (ECF No.\n\n 5 35).\n\n 6 The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case.\n\n 7\n\n 8 DATED THIS 29th day of June 2023.\n\n 9\n\n10\n\n11\n ANNE R. TRAUM\n12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE\n13\n\n14\n\n15\n\n16\n\n17\n\n18\n\n19\n20\n\n21\n\n22\n\n23\n\n24\n\n25\n\n26\n\n27\n\n28\n\n\n 2\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2023-07-03T01:28:16.587179-07:00","document_number":"37","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"115010025877","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":true,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order Dismissing Case","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2023-06-30T10:23:40.309959-07:00","date_modified":"2024-11-19T06:43:48.961460-08:00","date_filed":"2023-06-29","time_filed":"10:00:43","entry_number":37,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-06-30.001","pacer_sequence_number":137,"description":" ORDER Remanding case to state court. Accordingly, it is further ordered that the following outstanding motions are moot: Motion to Consolidate (ECF No. 10 ); Motion to Remand (ECF No. 11 ); Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 26 ); Motion to Stay (ECF No. 27 ); Motion for Leave to File Document (ECF No. 31 ); Second Motion for Leave to File Document (ECF No. 35 ). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. Signed by District Judge Anne R. Traum on 6/29/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF; CC: certified copy of order and docket sheet mailed to state court - RGDG)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/347715720/","id":347715720,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67081032/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/354143881/","id":354143881,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67081032/36/atanasoff-v-bradford/","date_created":"2023-06-28T11:24:43.105620-07:00","date_modified":"2023-06-28T11:24:43.107443-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"36","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"115010021133","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Notice Other","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2023-06-28T11:24:43.098343-07:00","date_modified":"2023-06-28T11:24:43.100596-07:00","date_filed":"2023-06-28","time_filed":"10:36:32","entry_number":36,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-06-28.001","pacer_sequence_number":132,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/345791552/","id":345791552,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67081032/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/352134417/","id":352134417,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67081032/33/atanasoff-v-bradford/","date_created":"2023-06-06T11:09:02.247479-07:00","date_modified":"2024-11-19T06:15:08.348411-08:00","sha1":"69c0de4394a1dcc538c8a5ba36f6581e3e1b3224","page_count":3,"file_size":235914,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.nvd.161148/gov.uscourts.nvd.161148.33.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.nvd.161148/gov.uscourts.nvd.161148.33.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":" Case 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW Document 33 Filed 06/05/23 Page 1 of 3\n\n\n\n 1\n\n 2\n\n 3\n\n 4\n\n 5\n\n 6\n\n 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n\n 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA\n\n 9 ERIC ATANASOFF, Derivatively on Behalf of\n CLEANSPARK, INC.,\n10 Plaintiff, Case No.: 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW\n11 v. (Removal from District Court, Clark County,\n12 Nevada, Case No. A-23-866492-C)\n ZACHARY K. BRADFORD,\n13 S. MATTHEW SCHULTZ, ROGER P.\n BEYNON, LARRY MCNEILL, and THOMAS\n14 L. WOOD, ORDER APPROVING\n15 Defendants, STIPULATION TO RESET\n16 BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR\n -and- MOTION TO DISMISS\n17\n CLEANSPARK, INC., a Nevada Corporation,\n18\n Nominal Defendant.\n19\n\n20 Plaintiff Eric Atanasoff (\u201cPlaintiff\u201d), derivatively on behalf of Nominal Plaintiff\n21 CleanSpark, Inc. (\u201cCleanSpark\u201d) and Defendants Zachary K. Bradford, S. Matthew Schultz,\n22 Larry McNeill, Thomas L. Wood, Roger P. Beynon (the \u201cIndividual Defendants\u201d), and Nominal\n23 Defendant CleanSpark (together with the Individual Defendants, \u201cDefendants\u201d) (collectively,\n24 with Plaintiff, the \u201cParties\u201d), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby enter into the\n25 following stipulation and proposed order:\n26 WHEREAS, on April 25, 2023 the Court granted the Stipulation to Set Briefing\n27 Schedule for Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 21)(the \u201cScheduling Order\u201d);\n28 WHEREAS, on May 5, 2023, Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss or, in the\n 1\n\f Case 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW Document 33 Filed 06/05/23 Page 2 of 3\n\n\n\n 1 Alternative, to Stay the Action (the \u201cMotion to Dismiss\u201d) in accordance with the Scheduling\n\n 2 Order; and\n\n 3 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Scheduling Order, Plaintiff\u2019s deadline to oppose the Motion\n\n 4 to Dismiss is currently June 5, 2023; and\n\n 5 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Scheduling Order, Defendants\u2019 deadline to reply in support\n\n 6 of the Motion to Dismiss is currently June 26, 2023\n\n 7 WHEREAS, the parties now seek a short additional extension for both Plaintiff\u2019s\n\n 8 opposition and Defendants\u2019 subsequent reply.\n\n 9 NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by the Parties\n\n10 hereto, through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows:\n\n11 1. Plaintiff\u2019s deadline to oppose the Motion to Dismiss is extended until on or before\n\n12 June 12, 2023.\n\n13 2. Defendants\u2019 deadline to reply in support of the Motion to Dismiss is extended\n\n14 until on or before July 7, 2023.\n\n15 3. Other than as agreed herein, the Parties reserve all rights.\n\n16\n\n17 DATED: June 1, 2023 DATED: June 1, 2023\n18\n FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP ALDRICH LAW FIRM, LTD.\n19\n s/ Mark J. Connot s/ Catherine Hernandez\n20 MARK J. CONNOT (10010) JOHN P. ALDRICH (6877)\n COLLEEN E. MCCARTY (13186) CATHERINE HERNANDEZ (8410)\n21 1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Ste. 700 7866 West Sahara Avenue\n22 Las Vegas, NV 89135 Las Vegas, Nevada 89117\n mconnot@foxrothschild.com jaldrich@johnaldrichlawfirm.com\n23 cmccarty@foxrothschild.com chernandez@johnaldrichlawfirm.com\n Counsel for Defendants Counsel for Plaintiff\n24\n\n25\n\n26\n\n27\n\n28\n 2\n\f Case 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW Document 33 Filed 06/05/23 Page 3 of 3\n\n\n\n 1 IT IS SO ORDERED.\n 2\n\n 3 _____________________________________\n Anne R. Traum\n 4 United States District Court Judge\n\n 5 DATED: June 5, 2023\n 6\n\n 7\n\n 8\n\n 9\n\n10\n\n11\n\n12\n\n13\n\n14\n\n15\n\n16\n\n17\n\n18\n\n19\n\n20\n\n21\n\n22\n\n23\n\n24\n\n25\n\n26\n\n27\n\n28\n 3\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2023-06-07T01:37:06.723955-07:00","document_number":"33","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"11509990377","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":true,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order AND Order on Stipulation","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2023-06-06T11:09:02.241002-07:00","date_modified":"2024-11-19T06:15:08.340427-08:00","date_filed":"2023-06-05","time_filed":"10:27:40","entry_number":33,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-06-06.001","pacer_sequence_number":121,"description":" ORDER APPROVING ECF No. 32 Stipulation to Reset Briefing Schedule for Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's Response due by 6/12/2023. Defendants' Reply due by 7/7/2023 as to ECF No. 26 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Anne R. Traum on 6/5/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CJS)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/286497511/","id":286497511,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67081032/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/292714258/","id":292714258,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67081032/23/atanasoff-v-bradford/","date_created":"2023-04-21T12:14:15.755630-07:00","date_modified":"2024-11-19T05:13:35.845451-08:00","sha1":"0a2d6ba5234497ae0d68ae9dfda14e1ebc039f6e","page_count":6,"file_size":354408,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.nvd.161148/gov.uscourts.nvd.161148.23.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.nvd.161148/gov.uscourts.nvd.161148.23.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":" Case 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW Document 23 Filed 04/21/23 Page 1 of 6\n\n\n\n 1\n\n 2\n\n 3\n\n 4\n\n 5\n\n 6\n\n 7\n\n 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA\n10\n ERIC ATANASOFF, Derivatively on Behalf of Case No.: 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW\n11 CLEANSPARK, INC.,\n Plaintiff, (Removal from District Court, Clark County,\n12 Nevada, Case No. A-23-866492-C)\n v.\n13\n\n14 ZACHARY K. BRADFORD, ORDER APPROVING\n S. MATTHEW SCHULTZ, ROGER P.\n15 BEYNON, LARRY MCNEILL, and THOMAS STIPULATION TO SET BRIEFING\n L. WOOD, SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO\n16 DISMISS\n Defendants,\n17\n\n18 -and-\n\n19 CLEANSPARK, INC., a Nevada Corporation,\n\n20 Nominal Defendant.\n21 Plaintiff Eric Atanasoff (\u201cPlaintiff\u201d), derivatively on behalf of Nominal Plaintiff\n\n22 CleanSpark, Inc. (\u201cCleanSpark\u201d) and Defendants Zachary K. Bradford, S. Matthew Schultz,\n\n23 Larry McNeill, Thomas L. Wood, Roger P. Beynon (the \u201cIndividual Defendants\u201d), and Nominal\n\n24 Defendant CleanSpark (together with the Individual Defendants, \u201cDefendants\u201d) (collectively,\n\n25 with Plaintiff, the \u201cParties\u201d), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby enter into the\n\n26 following stipulation and proposed order:\n\n27 ///\n\n28 ///\n 1\n 144760884.1\n\f Case 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW Document 23 Filed 04/21/23 Page 2 of 6\n\n\n\n 1 The Six Derivative Actions\n\n 2 WHEREAS, on May 26, 2021, plaintiff Andrea Ciceri filed a shareholder derivative\n\n 3 action on behalf of nominal defendant CleanSpark in the United States District Court for the\n\n 4 District of Nevada, captioned Ciceri v. Bradford, et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-01004-GMN-BNW\n\n 5 (\u201cCiceri\u201d). Ciceri was assigned to the Honorable Gloria M. Navarro; and\n\n 6 WHEREAS, on June 22, 2021, plaintiff Mark Perna filed a second shareholder\n\n 7 derivative action on behalf of nominal defendant CleanSpark in the United States District Court\n\n 8 for the District of Nevada, captioned Perna v. Bradford, et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-01181-GMN-\n\n 9 BNW (\u201cPerna\u201d). Perna was also assigned to the Honorable Gloria M. Navarro; and\n\n10 WHEREAS, on June 29, 2021, Judge Navarro consolidated Ciceri and Perna into a\n\n11 single consolidated action, captioned In re Cleanspark, Inc. Derivative Litigation, Case No.\n\n12 2:21-cv-01004-GMN-BNW (the \u201cConsolidated Action\u201d) and designated the complaint filed in\n\n13 Ciceri as the operative complaint pursuant to a Joint Stipulation and Order Consolidating Related\n\n14 Actions and Appointing Co-Lead Counsel (the \u201cConsolidation Order\u201d); and\n\n15 WHEREAS, on February 24, 2023, plaintiff Nicholas Iraci filed a third shareholder\n\n16 derivative action on behalf of nominal defendant CleanSpark in the Eighth Judicial District Court\n\n17 of the State of Nevada in and for Clark County, captioned Iraci v. Bradford, et al., Case No. A-\n\n18 23-866172-C (\u201cIraci\u201d); and\n\n19 WHEREAS, on February 28, 2023, defendant S. Matthew Schultz (\u201cSchultz\u201d) filed a\n\n20 Petition for Removal and Notice of Petition for Removal, removing Iraci to the United States\n\n21 District Court for the District of Nevada. Iraci is now pending in the United States District Court\n\n22 for the District of Nevada before the Honorable Jennifer A. Dorsey, captioned Iraci v. Bradford,\n\n23 et al., Case No. 2:23-cv-00315-JAD-NJK. On March 6, 2023, defendant Schultz filed a Notice\n\n24 of Related Case, requesting that Iraci be transferred to Judge Navarro and added to the\n\n25 Consolidated Action; and\n\n26 WHEREAS, on March 1, 2023, plaintiff Eric Atanasoff filed a fourth shareholder\n\n27 derivative action on behalf of nominal defendant CleanSpark in the Eighth Judicial District Court\n\n28\n 2\n 144760884.1\n\f Case 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW Document 23 Filed 04/21/23 Page 3 of 6\n\n\n\n 1 of the State of Nevada in and for Clark County, captioned Atanasoff v. Bradford, et al., Case No.\n\n 2 A-23-866492-C (\u201cAtanasoff\u201d); and\n\n 3 WHEREAS, on March 7, 2023, defendant Schultz filed a Petition for Removal and\n\n 4 Notice of Petition for Removal, removing Atanasoff to the United States District Court for the\n\n 5 District of Nevada. Atanasoff is now pending in this Court. On March 9, 2023, defendant\n\n 6 Schultz filed a Notice of Related Case, requesting that Atanasoff be transferred to Judge Navarro\n\n 7 and added to the Consolidated Action; and\n\n 8 WHEREAS, on February 21, 2013, plaintiff Brandon Smith filed a fifth shareholder\n\n 9 derivative action on behalf of nominal defendant CleanSpark in the Eighth Judicial District Court\n\n10 of the State of Nevada in and for Clark County, captioned Smith v. Bradford, et al., Case No. A-\n\n11 23-866051-C (\u201cSmith\u201d); and\n\n12 WHEREAS, on March 23, 2023, Defendants filed a Petition for Removal and Notice of\n\n13 Removal, removing Smith to the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. Smith is\n\n14 now pending in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada before Judge Navarro,\n\n15 captioned Smith v. Bradford, et al., Case No. 2:23-cv-00445-GMN-BNW. On March 24, 2023,\n\n16 Defendants filed a Notice of Related Case, requesting that Smith be added to the Consolidated\n\n17 Action; and\n\n18 WHEREAS, on March 8, 2023, plaintiff Travis France filed a sixth shareholder\n\n19 derivative action on behalf of nominal defendant CleanSpark in the Eighth Judicial District Court\n\n20 of the State of Nevada in and for Clark County, captioned France v. Bradford, et al., Case No.\n\n21 A-23-866925-C (\u201cFrance\u201d and together with the Iraci, Atanasoff, Smith, and the Consolidated\n\n22 Action, the \u201cSix Derivative Actions\u201d); and\n\n23 WHEREAS, on March 23, 2023, Defendants filed a Petition for Removal and Notice of\n\n24 Removal, removing France to the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.\n\n25 France is also now pending in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada before\n\n26 Judge Navarro, captioned France v. Bradford, et al., Case No. 2:23-cv-00444-GMN-NJK. On\n\n27 March 24, 2023, Defendants filed a Notice of Related Case, requesting that France be added to\n\n28 the Consolidated Action; and\n 3\n 144760884.1\n\f Case 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW Document 23 Filed 04/21/23 Page 4 of 6\n\n\n\n 1 WHEREAS, on March 24, 2023, Defendants filed a Motion to Consolidate in the\n\n 2 Consolidated Action, with notifications for Iraci, Atanasoff, Smith, and France, requesting that\n\n 3 those cases be consolidated with the Consolidated Action before Judge Navarro; and\n\n 4 WHEREAS, between March 30, 2023 and April 6, 2023, plaintiffs in Iraci, Atanasoff,\n\n 5 Smith, and France all filed motions to remand those actions back to state court; and\n\n 6 WHEREAS, the parties in Six Derivative Actions have the following briefing deadlines:\n\n 7\n Date Case Task\n 8\n 3/24/2023 Atanasoff Defendants' Motion to Consolidate Cases\n 9 3/24/2023 France Defendants' Motion to Consolidate Cases\n 3/24/2023 Iraci Defendants' Motion to Consolidate Cases\n10\n 3/24/2023 Smith Defendants' Motion to Consolidate Cases\n11 3/30/2023 Iraci Plaintiff's Motion to Remand to State Court\n 3/31/2023 France Plaintiff's Motion to Remand to State Court\n12 4/4/2023 Atanasoff Plaintiff's Motion to Remand to State Court\n13 4/6/2023 Smith Plaintiff's Motion to Remand to State Court\n 4/7/2023 France Plaintiff's Response to Motion to Consolidate\n14 4/7/2023 Atanasoff Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion to Consolidate\n15 4/11/2023 France Defendants' Motion to Dismiss\n 4/13/2023 Iraci Defendants' Opposition to Motion to Remand\n16 4/14/2023 France Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff\u2019s Opposition to Motion to Consolidate\n 4/14/2023 Atanasoff Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff\u2019s Opposition to Motion to Consolidate\n17\n 4/14/2023 France Defendants' Opposition to Motion to Remand\n18 4/17/2023 Iraci Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion to Consolidate\n 4/17/2023 Smith Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion to Consolidate\n19\n 4/18/2023 Atanasoff Defendants' Opposition to Motion to Remand\n20 4/20/2023 Smith Defendants' Opposition to Motion to Remand to State Court\n 4/20/2023 Iraci Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant\u2019s Opposition to Motion to Remand\n21\n 4/21/2023 France Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant\u2019s Opposition to Motion to Remand\n22 4/24/2023 Smith Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff\u2019s Opposition to Motion to Consolidate\n 4/24/2023 Iraci Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff\u2019s Opposition to Motion to Consolidate\n23 4/24/2023 Iraci Defendants' Motion to Dismiss\n24 4/25/2023 Atanasoff Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant\u2019s Opposition to Motion to Remand\n Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant's Opposition to Motion to Remand to State\n25 4/27/2023 Smith Court\n 5/5/2023 Atanasoff Defendants' Motion to Dismiss\n26\n 5/11/2023 France Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion to Dismiss (pending court approval)\n27 5/24/2023 Iraci Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion to Dismiss\n Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion to Dismiss (pending\n28 6/1/2023 France court approval)\n 4\n 144760884.1\n\f Case 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW Document 23 Filed 04/21/23 Page 5 of 6\n\n\n\n 1 6/5/2023 Atanasoff Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion to Dismiss (pending court approval)\n 6/14/2023 Iraci Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff\u2019s Opposition to Motion to Dismiss\n 2\n Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion to Dismiss (pending\n 3 6/26/2023 Atanasoff court approval)\n\n 4 This Action\n 5 WHEREAS, on April 5, 2023, after meeting and conferring extensively, the Parties\n 6 submitted a joint Stipulation and [proposed] Order Extending Time to Respond to Complaint\n 7 (the \u201cStipulation\u201d), agreeing, subject to the Court\u2019s approval, to extend: (i) Defendants\u2019 time to\n 8 respond to the Complaint until May 5, 2023, (ii) Plaintiff\u2019s time to oppose any motion to dismiss\n 9 the Complaint that Defendants file until on or before June 5, 2023, and (iii) Defendants\u2019 time to\n10 reply in support of any motion to dismiss the Complaint that Defendants file until on or before\n11 June 26, 2023; and\n12 WHEREAS, on April 6, 2023, Magistrate Brenda Weksler granted the Stipulation in part\n13 and denied it in part, extending Defendants\u2019 time to respond to the Complaint until May 5, 2023,\n14 but instructing the Parties to make a separate filing setting forth their proposed briefing schedule\n15 for any motion to dismiss that Defendants file pursuant to LR IC 2-2(b); and\n16 WHEREAS, Defendants intend to move to dismiss the Complaint in this Action on or\n17 before May 5, 2023; and\n18 WHEREAS, given the crowded briefing schedules in the Six Derivative Actions, the\n19 Parties agree to extend the deadline for Plaintiff to oppose any motion to dismiss the Complaint\n20 that Defendants file until on or before June 5, 2023; and\n21 WHEREAS, given the crowded briefing schedules in the Six Derivative Actions, the\n22 Parties agree to extend the deadline for Defendants to reply in support of any motion to dismiss\n23 the Complaint until on or before June 26, 2023.\n24 NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by the Parties\n25 hereto, through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows:\n26 1. Plaintiff\u2019s deadline to oppose any motion to dismiss the Complaint that\n27 Defendants file is extended until on or before June 5, 2023.\n28 2. Defendants\u2019 deadline to reply in support of any motion to dismiss the Complaint\n 5\n 144760884.1\n\f Case 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW Document 23 Filed 04/21/23 Page 6 of 6\n\n\n\n 1 that Defendants file is extended until on or before June 26, 2023.\n\n 2 3. Other than as agreed herein, the Parties reserve all rights.\n\n 3 DATED: April 17, 2023 DATED: April 17, 2023\n 4\n FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP ALDRICH LAW FIRM, LTD.\n 5\n /s/ Colleen E. McCarty /s/ John P. Aldrich\n 6 MARK J. CONNOT (10010) JOHN P. ALDRICH (6877)\n COLLEEN E. MCCARTY (13186) CATHERINE HERNANDEZ (8410)\n 7 1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Ste. 700 7866 West Sahara Avenue\n 8 Las Vegas, NV 89135 Las Vegas, Nevada 89117\n mconnot@foxrothschild.com jaldrich@johnaldrichlawfirm.com\n 9 cmccarty@foxrothschild.com chernandez@johnaldrichlawfirm.com\n Counsel for Defendants\n10\n DATED: April 17, 2023\n11\n\n12 THE WEISER LAW FIRM, P.C.\n\n13 /s/ James M. Ficaro\n JAMES M. FICARO\n14 200 Barr Harbor Drive\n West Conshohocken, PA 19428\n15\n\n16 Counsel for Plaintiff Eric Atanasoff\n\n17\n\n18\n IT IS SO ORDERED.\n19\n\n20\n _____________________________________\n21 Anne R. Traum\n United States District Court Judge\n22\n DATED: April 21, 2023.\n23\n\n24\n\n25\n\n26\n\n27\n\n28\n 6\n 144760884.1\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2023-04-25T01:28:20.016862-07:00","document_number":"23","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"11509930524","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":true,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order AND Order on Stipulation","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2023-04-21T12:14:15.748195-07:00","date_modified":"2024-11-19T05:13:35.834051-08:00","date_filed":"2023-04-21","time_filed":"11:22:12","entry_number":23,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-04-21.001","pacer_sequence_number":87,"description":" ORDER APPROVING ECF No. 21 Stipulation to Set Briefing Schedule for Motion to Dismiss - NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by the Parties hereto, through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court , as follows: 1. Plaintiff's deadline to oppose any motion to dismiss the Complaint that Defendants file is extended until on or before June 5, 2023 (6/5/2023). 2. Defendants' deadline to reply in support of any motion to dismiss the Complaint that Defendants file is extended until on or before June 26, 2023 (6/26/2023). Signed by District Judge Anne R. Traum on 4/21/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CJS)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/280149693/","id":280149693,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67081032/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/286358666/","id":286358666,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67081032/20/atanasoff-v-bradford/","date_created":"2023-04-17T14:12:09.269185-07:00","date_modified":"2024-11-19T04:48:56.291727-08:00","sha1":"bdc319745b9b405f8935366e526bec032bde4b56","page_count":3,"file_size":253898,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.nvd.161148/gov.uscourts.nvd.161148.20.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.nvd.161148/gov.uscourts.nvd.161148.20.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":" Case 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW Document 20 Filed 04/17/23 Page 1 of 3\n\n\n\n 1\n\n 2\n\n 3\n\n 4\n\n 5\n\n 6\n\n 7\n\n 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA\n10\n ERIC ATANASOFF, Derivatively on Behalf of Case No.: 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW\n11 CLEANSPARK, INC.,\n Plaintiff, (Removal from District Court, Clark County,\n12 Nevada, Case No. A-23-866492-C)\n v.\n13\n\n14 ZACHARY K. BRADFORD, S. MATTHEW ORDER APPROVING\n SCHULTZ, ROGER P. BEYNON, LARRY\n15 MCNEILL, and THOMAS L. WOOD, JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING\n TIME TO REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO\n16 Defendants, MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE\n17 -and-\n18\n CLEANSPARK, INC., a Nevada Corporation,\n19\n Nominal Defendant.\n20\n\n21 Plaintiff Eric Atanasoff (\u201cPlaintiff\u201d), derivatively on behalf of Nominal Plaintiff\n\n22 CleanSpark, Inc. (\u201cCleanSpark\u201d) and Defendants Zachary K. Bradford, S. Matthew Schultz,\n\n23 Larry McNeill, Thomas L. Wood, Roger P. Beynon (the \u201cIndividual Defendants\u201d), and Nominal\n\n24 Defendant CleanSpark (together with the Individual Defendants, \u201cDefendants\u201d) (collectively,\n\n25 with Plaintiff, the \u201cParties\u201d), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby enter into the\n\n26 following joint stipulation and proposed order:\n\n27 WHEREAS, on March 1, 2023, Plaintiff filed a shareholder derivative complaint (the\n\n28 \u201cComplaint\u201d) on behalf of Nominal Plaintiff CleanSpark in the Eighth Judicial District Court of\n\n 1\n 144631383.1\n\f Case 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW Document 20 Filed 04/17/23 Page 2 of 3\n\n\n\n 1 the State of Nevada in and for Clark County (the \u201cState Court\u201d), captioned Atanasoff v.\n\n 2 Bradford, et al., Case No. A-23-866492-C (this \u201cAction\u201d); and\n\n 3 WHEREAS, on March 7, 2023, the Defendant S. Matthew Schultz filed a Petition for\n\n 4 Removal (ECF No. 1) and Notice of Removal, removing this Action from State Court to the\n\n 5 United States District Court for the District of Nevada; and\n\n 6 WHEREAS, on March 24, 2023, the Individual Defendants filed a Motion to\n\n 7 Consolidate, asking the Court to consolidate this Action into the consolidated shareholder\n\n 8 derivative action pending in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, In re\n\n 9 CleanSpark, Inc. Derivative Litigation, Case No. 2:21-cv-01181-GMN-BNW (the \u201cMotion to\n\n10 Consolidate\u201d) (ECF No. 10); and\n\n11 WHEREAS, on April 4, 2023, Plaintiff filed the Motion to Remand and for Attorney\u2019s\n\n12 Fees and Costs, which has been noticed for consideration by the Court in the normal course (the\n\n13 \u201cMotion to Remand\u201d); and\n\n14 WHEREAS, on April 7, 2023, Plaintiff filed the Opposition to Defendants\u2019 Motion to\n\n15 Consolidate (\u201cOpposition\u201d);\n\n16 WHEREAS, to ensure judicial and party economy, the Parties agree to extend the\n\n17 deadline for Defendants to reply to the Opposition until on or before April 24, 2023.\n\n18 NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by the\n\n19 Parties hereto, through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, as\n\n20 follows:\n\n21 1. Defendants\u2019 deadline to reply to the Opposition is extended until on or before\n\n22 April 24, 2023.\n\n23 2. Other than as agreed herein, the Parties reserve all rights.\n\n24 ///\n25\n ///\n26\n ///\n27\n ///\n28\n 2\n 144631383.1\n\f =\n Case 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW Document 20 Filed 04/17/23 Page 3 of 3\n\n\n\n 1 DATED: April 13, 2023 DATED: April 13, 2023\n 2 FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP ALDRICH LAW FIRM, LTD.\n 3\n /s/ Colleen E. McCarty /s/John P. Aldrich\n 4 MARK J. CONNOT (10010) JOHN P. ALDRICH (6877)\n COLLEEN E. MCCARTY (13186) CATHERINE HERNANDEZ (8410)\n 5 1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Ste. 700 7866 West Sahara Avenue\n Las Vegas, NV 89135 Las Vegas, Nevada 89117\n 6 mconnot@foxrothschild.com jaldrich@johnaldrichlawfirm.com\n 7 cmcarty@foxrothschild.com chernandez@johnaldrichlawfirm.com\n Counsel for Defendants Counsel for Plaintiffs\n 8\n THE WEISER LAW FIRM, P.C.\n 9 James M. Ficaro\n Pro Hac Vice application pending, Attorney\n10\n has complied with L.R. IA 11-2\n11 200 Barr Harbor Dr.\n West Conshohocken, PA\n12 Telephone: (610) 225-0206\n jmf@weiserlawfirm.com\n13 Counsel for Plaintiff Travis France\n14\n\n15\n IT IS SO ORDERED.\n16\n\n17 _____________________________________\n Anne R. Traum\n18 United States District Court Judge\n19\n DATED: April 17, 2023\n20\n\n21\n\n22\n\n23\n\n24\n\n25\n\n26\n\n27\n\n28\n 3\n 144631383.1\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2023-04-18T01:24:28.390727-07:00","document_number":"20","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"11509923553","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":true,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order AND Order on Stipulation","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2023-04-17T14:12:09.262516-07:00","date_modified":"2024-11-19T04:48:56.285951-08:00","date_filed":"2023-04-17","time_filed":"13:19:24","entry_number":20,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-04-17.001","pacer_sequence_number":76,"description":" ORDER granting ECF No. 18 Stipulation : Reply to ECF No. 15 Response re ECF No. 10 Motion to Consolidate due by 4/24/2023. Signed by District Judge Anne R. Traum on 4/17/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/266897178/","id":266897178,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67081032/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/273092941/","id":273092941,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67081032/13/atanasoff-v-bradford/","date_created":"2023-04-07T10:16:24.235612-07:00","date_modified":"2024-11-19T04:02:58.143353-08:00","sha1":"4d1c0d7d75acc6804d10fb6de16b3efbb3863c13","page_count":3,"file_size":1100805,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.nvd.161148/gov.uscourts.nvd.161148.13.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.nvd.161148/gov.uscourts.nvd.161148.13.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":" Case 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW Document 13\n 12 Filed 04/06/23\n 04/05/23 Page 1 of 3\n\n\n\n 1 MARK J. CONNOT (10010)\n COLLEEN E. MCCARTY (13186)\n 2 FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP\n 1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Ste. 700\n 3 Las Vegas, NV 89135\n Telephone: 702.262.6899\n 4 Facsimile: 702.597.5503\n mconnot@foxrothschild.com\n 5 cmccarty@foxrothschild.com\n Counsel for Defendants Zachary K. Bradford, S. Matthew Schultz,\n 6 Robert P. Beynon, Larry McNeill, and Thomas L. Wood and\n Nominal Defendant Cleanspark, Inc.\n 7\n\n 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA\n10\n ERIC ATANASOFF, Derivatively on Behalf of Case No.: 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW\n11 CLEANSPARK, INC.,\n Plaintiff, (Removal from District Court, Clark County,\n12 Nevada, Case No. A-23-866492-C)\n v.\n13\n\n14 ZACHARY K. BRADFORD, STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER\n S. MATTHEW SCHULTZ, ROGER P. EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO\n15 BEYNON, LARRY MCNEILL, and THOMAS COMPLAINT\n L. WOOD,\n16\n Defendants,\n17\n\n18 -and-\n\n19 CLEANSPARK, INC., a Nevada Corporation,\n\n20 Nominal Defendant.\n21\n\n22 Plaintiff Eric Atanasoff (\u201cPlaintiff\u201d), derivatively on behalf of Nominal Plaintiff\n\n23 CleanSpark, Inc. (\u201cCleanSpark\u201d) and Defendants Zachary K. Bradford, S. Matthew Schultz,\n\n24 Larry McNeill, Thomas L. Wood, Roger P. Beynon (the \u201cIndividual Defendants\u201d), and Nominal\n\n25 Defendant CleanSpark (together with the Individual Defendants, \u201cDefendants\u201d) (collectively,\n\n26 with Plaintiff, the \u201cParties\u201d), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby enter into the\n\n27 following stipulation and proposed order:\n\n28 ///\n\n 1\n 144401354.1\n\f Case 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW Document 13\n 12 Filed 04/06/23\n 04/05/23 Page 2 of 3\n\n\n\n 1 WHEREAS, on March 1, 2023, Plaintiff filed a shareholder derivative complaint (the\n\n 2 \u201cComplaint\u201d) on behalf of Nominal Plaintiff CleanSpark in the Eighth Judicial District Court of\n\n 3 the State of Nevada in and for Clark County (the \u201cState Court\u201d), captioned Atanasoff v.\n\n 4 Bradford, et al., Case No. A-23-866492-C (this \u201cAction\u201d); and\n\n 5 WHEREAS, on March 7, 2023, the Defendant S. Matthew Schultz filed a Petition for\n\n 6 Removal (ECF No. 1) and Notice of Removal, removing this Action from State Court to the\n\n 7 United States District Court for the District of Nevada; and\n\n 8 WHEREAS, on March 24, 2023, the Individual Defendants filed a Motion to\n\n 9 Consolidate, asking the Court to consolidate this Action into the consolidated shareholder\n\n10 derivative action pending in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, In re\n\n11 CleanSpark, Inc. Derivative Litigation, Case No. 2:21-cv-01181-GMN-BNW (the \u201cMotion to\n\n12 Consolidate\u201d) (ECF No. 10); and\n\n13 WHEREAS, on April 4, 2023, Plaintiff filed the Motion to Remand and for Attorney\u2019s\n\n14 Fees and Costs, which has been noticed for consideration by the Court in the normal course (the\n\n15 \u201cMotion to Remand\u201d) (ECF No. 11); and\n\n16 WHEREAS, Defendants intend to move to dismiss the Complaint in this Action; and\n\n17 WHEREAS, the Parties agree to extend the deadline for Defendants to respond to the\n\n18 Complaint until on or before May 5, 2023; and\n\n19 WHEREAS, the Parties agree to extend the deadline for Plaintiff to oppose any motion\n\n20 to dismiss the Complaint that Defendants file until on or before June 5, 2023; and\n\n21 WHEREAS, the Parties agree to extend the deadline for Defendants to reply in support\n\n22 of any motion to dismiss the Complaint until on or before June 26, 2023.\n\n23 NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by the\n\n24 Parties hereto, through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, as\n\n25 follows:\n\n26 1. Defendants\u2019 deadline to respond to the Complaint is extended until on or before\n\n27 May 5, 2023.\n\n28 2. Plaintiff\u2019s deadline to oppose any motion to dismiss the Complaint that\n 2\n 144401354.1\n\f Case 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW Document 13\n 12 Filed 04/06/23\n 04/05/23 Page 3 of 3\n\n\n\n 1 Defendants file is extended until on or before June 5, 2023.\n\n 2 3. Defendants\u2019 deadline to reply in support of any motion to dismiss the Complaint\n\n 3 that Defendants file is extended until on or before June 26, 2023.\n\n 4 4. Other than as agreed herein, the Parties reserve all rights.\n\n 5\n\n 6 DATED: April 5, 2023 DATED: April 5, 2023\n 7\n FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP ALDRICH LAW FIRM, LTD.\n 8\n /s/ Colleen E. McCarty /s/ John P. Aldrich\n 9 MARK J. CONNOT (10010) JOHN P. ALDRICH (6877)\n COLLEEN E. MCCARTY (13186) CATHERINE HERNANDEZ (8410)\n10 1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Ste. 700 7866 West Sahara Avenue\n11 Las Vegas, NV 89135 Las Vegas, Nevada 89117\n mconnot@foxrothschild.com jaldrich@johnaldrichlawfirm.com\n12 cmcarty@foxrothschild.com chernandez@johnaldrichlawfirm.com\n Counsel for Defendants Counsel for Plaintiffs\n13\n\n14\n\n15 ORDER\n IT IS ORDERED that ECF No. 12 is GRANTED IT in part andORDERED.\n IS SO DENIED in part without prejudice. It\n16 is granted to the extent that Defendants deadline to respond to the complaint shall be May\n 5, 2023. To the extent the parties stipulate to an extended motion to dismiss briefing\n17 schedule, they must file a separate motion. See LR IC 2-2(b).\n _____________________________________\n18\n IT IS SO ORDERED\n UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE\n DATED: 4:58 pm, April 06, 2023\n\n\n\n19 DATED: ______________________\n BRENDA WEKSLER\n UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE\n\n20\n\n21\n\n22\n\n23\n\n24\n\n25\n\n26\n\n27\n\n28\n 3\n 144401354.1\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2023-04-10T01:25:07.088698-07:00","document_number":"13","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"11509911276","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":true,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order AND Order on Stipulation","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2023-04-07T10:16:24.227026-07:00","date_modified":"2024-11-19T04:02:58.136996-08:00","date_filed":"2023-04-06","time_filed":"10:06:13","entry_number":13,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-04-07.001","pacer_sequence_number":56,"description":" ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that ECF No. 12 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part without prejudice. It is granted to the extent that Defendants deadline to respond to the complaint shall be May 5, 2023 (5/5/2023). To the extent the parties stipulate to an extended motion to dismiss briefingschedule, they must file a separate motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 4/6/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CJS)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/255769088/","id":255769088,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67081032/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/261942568/","id":261942568,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67081032/8/atanasoff-v-bradford/","date_created":"2023-03-23T12:20:22.257546-07:00","date_modified":"2023-03-23T12:20:22.260117-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"8","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"11509889420","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order on Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2023-03-23T12:20:22.250302-07:00","date_modified":"2023-03-23T12:20:22.253172-07:00","date_filed":"2023-03-23","time_filed":"11:29:22","entry_number":8,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-03-23.001","pacer_sequence_number":44,"description":"","tags":[]}],"entries_total":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/?count=on&docket=67081032&page_size=40"}