{"cached_at":"2026-10-04T10:42:40.199803+00:00","cl_docket_id":"61471283","docket":{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","id":61471283,"court":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/courts/wawd/","court_id":"wawd","original_court_info":null,"idb_data":null,"clusters":["https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/clusters/10240908/","https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/clusters/10239040/","https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/clusters/10246056/"],"audio_files":[],"assigned_to":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/people/3597/","referred_to":null,"bankruptcy_information":null,"absolute_url":"/docket/61471283/jaeger-v-zillow-group-inc/","date_created":"2021-11-16T17:06:09.568795-08:00","date_modified":"2026-09-29T12:05:11.750495-07:00","source":1,"appeal_from_str":"","assigned_to_str":"Thomas S. Zilly","referred_to_str":"","panel_str":"","date_last_index":"2024-12-10T03:21:00.754328-08:00","date_cert_granted":null,"date_cert_denied":null,"date_argued":null,"date_reargued":null,"date_reargument_denied":null,"date_filed":"2021-11-16","date_terminated":null,"date_last_filing":"2026-07-07","case_name_short":"Jaeger","case_name":"Jaeger v. Zillow Group Inc","case_name_full":"","slug":"jaeger-v-zillow-group-inc","docket_number":"2:21-cv-01551","docket_number_core":"2101551","docket_number_raw":"2:21-cv-01551","docket_number_source":0,"federal_dn_office_code":"2","federal_dn_case_type":"cv","federal_dn_judge_initials_assigned":"TSZ","federal_dn_judge_initials_referred":"","federal_defendant_number":null,"pacer_case_id":"305262","cause":"15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act","nature_of_suit":"850 Securities/Commodities","jury_demand":"Plaintiff","jurisdiction_type":"Federal Question","appellate_fee_status":"","appellate_case_type_information":"","mdl_status":"","filepath_ia":"","filepath_ia_json":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"ia_needs_upload":true,"ia_date_first_change":"2021-11-16T17:06:09.565824-08:00","date_blocked":null,"blocked":false,"appeal_from":null,"parent_docket":null,"tags":[],"panel":[]},"parties":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/11419725/","id":11419725,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8288765/","attorney_id":8288765,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":10},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493582/","attorney_id":7493582,"date_action":"2023-01-05","docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":6},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493582/","attorney_id":7493582,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":2}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"name":"Movant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2022-03-01T09:19:55.245489-08:00","date_modified":"2022-03-01T09:19:55.245506-08:00","name":"Steven Hackbarth","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/11419724/","id":11419724,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493590/","attorney_id":7493590,"date_action":"2022-02-07","docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":6},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493591/","attorney_id":7493591,"date_action":"2022-02-07","docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":6}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"name":"Movant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2022-03-01T09:19:55.209488-08:00","date_modified":"2022-03-01T09:19:55.209505-08:00","name":"Slav Danev","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/11419723/","id":11419723,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/10037422/","attorney_id":10037422,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/10037422/","attorney_id":10037422,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/10037422/","attorney_id":10037422,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7640581/","attorney_id":7640581,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7640581/","attorney_id":7640581,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7640581/","attorney_id":7640581,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9033773/","attorney_id":9033773,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9033773/","attorney_id":9033773,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9033773/","attorney_id":9033773,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7640583/","attorney_id":7640583,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7640583/","attorney_id":7640583,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7640583/","attorney_id":7640583,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7640584/","attorney_id":7640584,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7640584/","attorney_id":7640584,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7640584/","attorney_id":7640584,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9033774/","attorney_id":9033774,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9033774/","attorney_id":9033774,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9033774/","attorney_id":9033774,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7640585/","attorney_id":7640585,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7640585/","attorney_id":7640585,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7640585/","attorney_id":7640585,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7640586/","attorney_id":7640586,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7640586/","attorney_id":7640586,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7640586/","attorney_id":7640586,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7590774/","attorney_id":7590774,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8477013/","attorney_id":8477013,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/9754790/","attorney_id":9754790,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493589/","attorney_id":7493589,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"name":"Movant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]},{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"name":"Plaintiff","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"Lead Plaintiff","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2022-03-01T09:19:55.167411-08:00","date_modified":"2022-03-01T09:19:55.167427-08:00","name":"Jeremy Jaeger","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/11419722/","id":11419722,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493588/","attorney_id":7493588,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"name":"Movant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2022-03-01T09:19:55.149746-08:00","date_modified":"2022-03-01T09:19:55.149777-08:00","name":"Joseph Switzer","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/11419721/","id":11419721,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493586/","attorney_id":7493586,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493586/","attorney_id":7493586,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493586/","attorney_id":7493586,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13603423/","attorney_id":13603423,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"name":"Movant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2022-03-01T09:19:55.111890-08:00","date_modified":"2022-03-01T09:19:55.111908-08:00","name":"Alex Ambrose","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/11419720/","id":11419720,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7590772/","attorney_id":7590772,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":10},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7337395/","attorney_id":7337395,"date_action":"2022-03-03","docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":6}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"name":"Movant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2022-03-01T09:19:55.092282-08:00","date_modified":"2022-03-01T09:19:55.092313-08:00","name":"Lee McCormick","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/11419719/","id":11419719,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7590771/","attorney_id":7590771,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7590771/","attorney_id":7590771,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7590771/","attorney_id":7590771,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7406943/","attorney_id":7406943,"date_action":"2026-06-30","docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":6}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"name":"Consol Defendant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2022-03-01T09:19:55.084968-08:00","date_modified":"2022-03-01T09:19:55.084999-08:00","name":"Lloyd D Frink","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/11419718/","id":11419718,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493578/","attorney_id":7493578,"date_action":"2022-12-13","docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":6},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493579/","attorney_id":7493579,"date_action":"2022-12-13","docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":6},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493589/","attorney_id":7493589,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"name":"Consol Plaintiff","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2022-03-01T09:19:54.808793-08:00","date_modified":"2022-03-01T09:19:54.808827-08:00","name":"Aaron Winston Hillier","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/11419717/","id":11419717,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493582/","attorney_id":7493582,"date_action":"2023-01-05","docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":6},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493582/","attorney_id":7493582,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8083241/","attorney_id":8083241,"date_action":"2023-01-05","docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":6},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8083241/","attorney_id":8083241,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493580/","attorney_id":7493580,"date_action":"2023-01-05","docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":6},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493580/","attorney_id":7493580,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493589/","attorney_id":7493589,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"name":"Consol Plaintiff","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2022-03-01T09:19:54.748829-08:00","date_modified":"2022-03-01T09:19:54.748863-08:00","name":"Steven Silverberg","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/11419716/","id":11419716,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493578/","attorney_id":7493578,"date_action":"2022-08-08","docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":6},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493579/","attorney_id":7493579,"date_action":"2022-08-08","docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":6},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493589/","attorney_id":7493589,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"name":"Plaintiff","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2022-03-01T09:19:54.710137-08:00","date_modified":"2022-03-01T09:19:54.710157-08:00","name":"Sjunde AP-Fonden","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/11197338/","id":11197338,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13918866/","attorney_id":13918866,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13918866/","attorney_id":13918866,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13918866/","attorney_id":13918866,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493583/","attorney_id":7493583,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493583/","attorney_id":7493583,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493583/","attorney_id":7493583,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493584/","attorney_id":7493584,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493584/","attorney_id":7493584,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493584/","attorney_id":7493584,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493585/","attorney_id":7493585,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493585/","attorney_id":7493585,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493585/","attorney_id":7493585,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7590771/","attorney_id":7590771,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7590771/","attorney_id":7590771,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7590771/","attorney_id":7590771,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13918867/","attorney_id":13918867,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7406943/","attorney_id":7406943,"date_action":"2026-06-30","docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":6}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"name":"Defendant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2021-11-18T11:17:41.197568-08:00","date_modified":"2021-11-18T11:17:41.197609-08:00","name":"Jeremy Wacksman","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/11197337/","id":11197337,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13918866/","attorney_id":13918866,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13918866/","attorney_id":13918866,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13918866/","attorney_id":13918866,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493583/","attorney_id":7493583,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493583/","attorney_id":7493583,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493583/","attorney_id":7493583,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493584/","attorney_id":7493584,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493584/","attorney_id":7493584,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493584/","attorney_id":7493584,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493585/","attorney_id":7493585,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493585/","attorney_id":7493585,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493585/","attorney_id":7493585,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7590771/","attorney_id":7590771,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7590771/","attorney_id":7590771,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7590771/","attorney_id":7590771,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13918867/","attorney_id":13918867,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7406943/","attorney_id":7406943,"date_action":"2026-06-30","docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":6}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"name":"Defendant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2021-11-18T11:17:41.186761-08:00","date_modified":"2021-11-18T11:17:41.186811-08:00","name":"Allen Parker","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/11197336/","id":11197336,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13918866/","attorney_id":13918866,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13918866/","attorney_id":13918866,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13918866/","attorney_id":13918866,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493583/","attorney_id":7493583,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493583/","attorney_id":7493583,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493583/","attorney_id":7493583,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493584/","attorney_id":7493584,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493584/","attorney_id":7493584,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493584/","attorney_id":7493584,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493585/","attorney_id":7493585,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493585/","attorney_id":7493585,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493585/","attorney_id":7493585,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7590771/","attorney_id":7590771,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7590771/","attorney_id":7590771,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7590771/","attorney_id":7590771,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13918867/","attorney_id":13918867,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7406943/","attorney_id":7406943,"date_action":"2026-06-30","docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":6}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"name":"Defendant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2021-11-18T11:17:41.177796-08:00","date_modified":"2021-11-18T11:17:41.177835-08:00","name":"Richard Barton","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/11197335/","id":11197335,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13918866/","attorney_id":13918866,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13918866/","attorney_id":13918866,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13918866/","attorney_id":13918866,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493583/","attorney_id":7493583,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493583/","attorney_id":7493583,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493583/","attorney_id":7493583,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493584/","attorney_id":7493584,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493584/","attorney_id":7493584,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493584/","attorney_id":7493584,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493585/","attorney_id":7493585,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493585/","attorney_id":7493585,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493585/","attorney_id":7493585,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7590771/","attorney_id":7590771,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7590771/","attorney_id":7590771,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7590771/","attorney_id":7590771,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/13918867/","attorney_id":13918867,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7406943/","attorney_id":7406943,"date_action":"2026-06-30","docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":6}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"name":"Defendant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2021-11-18T11:17:41.164805-08:00","date_modified":"2021-11-18T11:17:41.164840-08:00","name":"Zillow Group Inc","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/11197334/","id":11197334,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7337395/","attorney_id":7337395,"date_action":"2022-03-03","docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":6},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7337395/","attorney_id":7337395,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7406942/","attorney_id":7406942,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7406942/","attorney_id":7406942,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7406942/","attorney_id":7406942,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7493589/","attorney_id":7493589,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","docket_id":61471283,"name":"Plaintiff","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2021-11-18T11:17:41.126003-08:00","date_modified":"2021-11-18T11:17:41.126045-08:00","name":"Dibakar Barua","extra_info":""}],"entries":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/470015662/","id":470015662,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/485372870/","id":485372870,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/61471283/166/jaeger-v-zillow-group-inc/","date_created":"2026-07-07T14:18:07.917904-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-07T14:18:07.936328-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"166","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"197012538332","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Notice of Appearance","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-07-07T14:18:07.872501-07:00","date_modified":"2026-08-06T00:15:40.869851-07:00","date_filed":"2026-07-07","time_filed":"13:23:53","entry_number":166,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-07-07.001","pacer_sequence_number":556,"description":"NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Joseph E. Bringman on behalf of Defendants Richard Barton, Allen Parker, Jeremy Wacksman, Zillow Group Inc. (Bringman, Joseph) (Entered: 07/07/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/469895578/","id":469895578,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/485249726/","id":485249726,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/61471283/165/jaeger-v-zillow-group-inc/","date_created":"2026-07-06T17:11:01.075766-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-27T09:45:48.288816-07:00","sha1":"490147931c0752a7fa7b7eea826ff26dd64e4415","page_count":3,"file_size":139535,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.wawd.305262/gov.uscourts.wawd.305262.165.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.wawd.305262/gov.uscourts.wawd.305262.165.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":" Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 165 Filed 07/06/26 Page 1 of 3\n\n\n\n\n 1\n\n 2\n\n 3\n\n 4\n\n 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON\n 6 AT SEATTLE\n\n 7\n JEREMY JAEGER, on behalf of\n himself and all others similarly situated,\n 8\n Plaintiff,\n 9 C21-1551 TSZ\n v.\n10 MINUTE ORDER\n ZILLOW GROUP, INC., et al.,\n11\n Defendants.\n12\n\n13 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable\n Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge:\n14\n (1) The parties\u2019 Stipulated Motion, docket no. 163, is GRANTED and the\n Court amends the case schedule, see Minute Order at 2\u20133 (docket no. 157) as follows:\n15\n JURY TRIAL DATE September 13, 2027\n16\n Fact Discovery Motions December 4, 2026\n17 Cut-off\n\n18 Oppositions to any Fact December 14, 2026\n Discovery Motions\n19 Distribution of Class December 14, 2026\n Notice\n20\n Replies to any Fact December 21, 2026\n Discovery Motions\n21\n Completion of Fact January 4, 2027\n22 Discovery\n\n23\n\n MINUTE ORDER - 1\n\f Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 165 Filed 07/06/26 Page 2 of 3\n\n\n\n\n 1 Expert Witness Reports January 25, 2027\n\n 2 Exchange of Rebuttal March 5, 2027\n Reports\n 3 Exchange of Reply March 19, 2027\n Reports\n 4\n Completion of Expert April 12, 2027\n 5 Discovery\n Deadline to File April 30, 2027\n 6 Dispositive Motions and\n Daubert Motions\n 7\n Oppositions to any May 28, 2027\n 8 Dispositive or Daubert\n Motions\n 9 Replies to any June 11, 2027\n Dispositive or Daubert\n10 Motions\n All motions in limine\n11\n should be filed by July 1, 2027\n12\n All motions in limine\n shall be presented in a\n13\n joint submission, which\n shall be noted for the\n14\n same day it is filed 1\n15 Agreed Pretrial Order\n due 2 July 16, 2027\n16\n\n17\n 1\n The joint submission shall contain (i) an introductory statement summarizing the case\n18 and the context for any evidentiary disputes; (ii) a list of any agreed motions in limine; and (iii)\n any disputed motions in limine, each set forth under a separate heading, below which the moving\n19 party will state its position and supporting legal authority, and the opposing party will do the\n same. Plaintiff\u2019s disputed motions in limine shall be sequentially numbered; defendant\u2019s\n20 disputed motions in limine shall be identified in alphabetical order. All provisions of Local Civil\n Rule 7(d)(5) that are not inconsistent with this Minute Order shall remain in full force and effect.\n21 2\n The Agreed Pretrial Order shall be filed in CM/ECF and shall also be attached as a\n Word compatible file to an e\u2212mail sent to the following address:\n22 ZillyOrders@wawd.uscourts.gov.\n\n23\n\n MINUTE ORDER - 2\n\f Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 165 Filed 07/06/26 Page 3 of 3\n\n\n\n\n 1 Trial Briefs, proposed July 16, 2027\n voir dire questions, and\n 2 jury instructions due\n Pretrial Conference to be August 27, 2027\n 3\n held at 10:00 AM on\n 4\n\n 5 (2) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of\n record.\n 6\n Dated this 6th day of July, 2026.\n 7\n Joshua C. Lewis\n 8 Clerk\n 9 s/Grant Cogswell\n Deputy Clerk\n10\n\n11\n\n12\n\n13\n\n14\n\n15\n\n16\n\n17\n\n18\n\n19\n\n20\n\n21\n\n22\n\n23\n\n MINUTE ORDER - 3\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2026-07-07T05:45:19.981568-07:00","document_number":"165","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"197012536385","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Minute Order","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-07-06T17:11:01.029814-07:00","date_modified":"2026-08-11T12:26:56.470527-07:00","date_filed":"2026-07-06","time_filed":"16:18:01","entry_number":165,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-07-06.001","pacer_sequence_number":552,"description":"MINUTE ORDER made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: (1) The parties' Stipulated Motion, docket no. 163, is GRANTED and the Court amends the case schedule, see Minute Order at 23 (docket no. 157 ) as follows: Jury Trial is set for 9/13/2027. Fact Discovery Motions due by 12/4/2026, Oppositions to any Fact Discovery Motions due by 12/14/2026, Distribution of Class Notice due by 12/14/2026, Replies to any Fact Discovery Motions due by 12/21/2026, Completion of Fact Discovery due by 1/4/2027, Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 1/25/2027, Exchange of Rebuttal Reports due by 3/5/2027, Exchange of Reply Reports due by 3/19/2027, Completion of Expert Discovery due by 4/12/2027, Dispositive motions and Daubert motions due by 4/30/2027, Oppositions to any Dispositive or Daubert Motions due by 5/28/2027, Replies to any Dispositive or Daubert Motions due by 6/11/2027, Motions in Limine due by 7/1/2027, Agreed Pretrial Order due by 7/16/2027, Trial Briefs, proposed voir dire questions, and jury instructions due by 7/16/2027, Pretrial Conference set for 8/27/2027 at 10:00 AM. (CJS) (Entered: 07/06/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/469870503/","id":469870503,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/485224146/","id":485224146,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/61471283/164/jaeger-v-zillow-group-inc/","date_created":"2026-07-06T14:10:27.891497-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-06T14:10:27.918702-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"164","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"197012535370","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Case/IFP Deficiency Letter","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-07-06T14:10:27.803450-07:00","date_modified":"2026-08-11T12:26:56.479953-07:00","date_filed":"2026-07-06","time_filed":"13:36:08","entry_number":164,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-07-06.002","pacer_sequence_number":549,"description":"Notice of Filing Deficiency re 162 Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel. ***Action Required*** Compliance with LCR 83.2 - Attorney Appearance and Withdrawal.See attached letter for more information and instructions. (CJS)(cc: attorney Bringman via Ad Hoc NEF) (Entered: 07/06/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/469781874/","id":469781874,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/485133542/","id":485133542,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/61471283/161/jaeger-v-zillow-group-inc/","date_created":"2026-07-06T06:12:15.185230-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-06T06:12:15.242200-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"161","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order on Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-07-06T06:12:15.134455-07:00","date_modified":"2026-08-11T12:26:56.445237-07:00","date_filed":"2026-06-18","time_filed":null,"entry_number":161,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-06-18.001","pacer_sequence_number":null,"description":"ORDER re 160 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Manuel F. Cachan for Defendants Richard Barton, Allen Parker, Jeremy Wacksman, Zillow Group Inc., by Clerk Joshua C. Lewis. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(PS) (Entered: 06/18/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/469450948/","id":469450948,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/484789448/","id":484789448,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/61471283/163/jaeger-v-zillow-group-inc/","date_created":"2026-07-01T12:20:58.750239-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-06T06:12:15.644729-07:00","sha1":"2b57feaacd45bb9a1234d7f93393f8ce7b59fa91","page_count":5,"file_size":88145,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.wawd.305262/gov.uscourts.wawd.305262.163.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.wawd.305262/gov.uscourts.wawd.305262.163.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":" Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 163 Filed 07/01/26 Page 1 of 5\n\n\n\n\n 1 The Honorable Thomas S. Zilly\n\n 2\n\n 3\n\n 4\n\n 5\n\n 6\n\n 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON\n 8 AT SEATTLE\n 9\n\n10 JEREMY JAEGER, on behalf of himself No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ\n and all others similarly situated,\n11 STIPULATED MOTION TO AMEND\n Plaintiff, SCHEDULING ORDER\n12\n\n13 v. NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR:\n July 1, 2026\n14 ZILLOW GROUP, INC., et al.,\n\n15 Defendants.\n16\n\n17\n Pursuant to Local Rules 7(d)(1) and 10(g), Lead Plaintiff Jeremy Jaeger, together with\n18 Defendants Zillow Group, Inc., Richard Barton, Allen Parker, and Jeremy Wacksman (the\n19 \u201cParties\u201d), respectfully request that this Court alter certain case deadlines set in the Minute Order\n20 dated February 19, 2026 (Dkt. 157). As discussed herein, good cause exists to alter the case\n21 schedule.\n22 The Parties stipulate as follows:\n23 On February 6, 2023, the Parties submitted a Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan (Dkt.\n\n24 106), which set forth a proposed schedule in this case.\n\n25 On July 7, 2023, the Court issued a Minute Order setting case deadlines (Dkt. 108), which,\n\n26 among other things, granted the Parties, sua sponte, additional time for several case\n\n27 events/deadlines in comparison to the proposed schedule the Parties submitted to the Court.\n\n28\n STIPULATED MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER \u2013 1\n No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ 1301 Second Avenue, Suite 2000, Seattle, WA 98101\n (206) 623-7292 OFFICE (206) 623-0594 FAX\n 011060-11/2847587 V2\n\f Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 163 Filed 07/01/26 Page 2 of 5\n\n\n\n\n 1 On December 20, 2023, the Court issued an Order Granting Stipulated Motion to Amend\n\n 2 Scheduling Order, granting the Parties\u2019 stipulation to change certain discovery deadlines. Dkt. 112.\n\n 3 On June 5, 2024, the Court issued an Order Granting Stipulated Motion to Amend\n\n 4 Scheduling Order, granting the Parties\u2019 stipulation to change certain discovery deadlines. Dkt. 120.\n\n 5 On September 30, 2024, the Court issued a Minute Order granting the Parties\u2019 Stipulated\n Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order by four months to resolve certain production issues.\n 6\n Dkt. 145.\n 7\n On October 24, 2024, the Ninth Circuit granted Zillow\u2019s 23(f) Petition (Dkt. 147) and the\n 8\n Court entered a Minute Order on November 1, 2024, staying the case pending the resolution of\n 9\n Zillow\u2019s Petition (Dkt. 149).\n10\n On September 26, 2025, the Ninth Circuit entered its opinion affirming the certification of\n11\n the class. Dkt. 151. Zillow then sought a rehearing and en banc consideration, which was\n12\n unanimously denied in January 2026. The mandate was returned to the district court on January\n13\n 14, 2026. Dkt. 155.\n14\n On February 19, 2026, the Court entered a Minute Order setting the current case schedule,\n15 Dkt. 157, as reflected in the Parties\u2019 Joint Status Report, Dkt. 156.\n16 On June 2, 2026, the Court granted the Parties\u2019 Stipulated Motion on the Approval of Class\n17 Notice. Dkt. 159.\n18 On June 5, 2026, Zillow filed a petition for writ of certiorari at the Supreme Court of the\n19 United States. Plaintiff filed a waiver of the right of respondent to file a response soon thereafter.\n20 On June 17, 2026, the Supreme Court of the United States distributed Zillow\u2019s petition for\n\n21 writ of certiorari for the September 28, 2026 conference.\n\n22 On June 25, 2026, the Supreme Court of the United States requested a response from\n\n23 Plaintiff, with a due date of July 27, 2026.\n The Parties agree and jointly contend that they have met all previous case deadlines and\n24\n have been litigating this case in a diligent and cooperative manner. Plaintiff has already taken\n25\n eleven depositions, with another five scheduled to take place over the summer. However, due to\n26\n the recent request for a response from the Supreme Court of the United States, along with some\n27\n\n28\n STIPULATED MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER \u2013 2\n No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ 1301 Second Avenue, Suite 2000, Seattle, WA 98101\n (206) 623-7292 OFFICE (206) 623-0594 FAX\n 011060-11/2847587 V2\n\f Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 163 Filed 07/01/26 Page 3 of 5\n\n\n\n\n 1 difficulties with scheduling certain Executive Defendant depositions in September and October,\n\n 2 the Parties have agreed to extend the case schedule for approximately three months.\n\n 3 The Parties have also been diligently working with the notice administrator on class notice\n\n 4 and are prepared to distribute the class notice on the July 2, 2026 deadline. However, the Parties\n\n 5 agree that postponing class notice until after the petition for writ of certiorari is resolved will\n minimize confusion to class members and reduce costs should the notice be amended due to any\n 6\n developments with Zillow\u2019s petition for writ of certiorari.\n 7\n The Parties acknowledge that the proposed schedule continues the pre-trial and trial dates\n 8\n originally set in the July 7, 2023 Minute Order, then amended in the December 20, 2023, June 5,\n 9\n 2024, September 30, 2024, and February 19, 2026 Minute Orders. However, as explained more\n10\n fully above, the Parties jointly contend that there is good cause for adjusting the pre-trial and trial\n11\n dates and that doing so will likely conserve litigation resources expended both by the Parties and\n12\n the Court.\n13\n Accordingly, the Parties, subject to approval of the Court, stipulate and agree that good\n14\n cause exists to request the following proposed case schedule modifications:\n15 Event Current Deadline Proposed Deadline\n16 JURY TRIAL DATE April 26, 2027 August 2, 2027\n Fact Discovery Motions Cut-off July 9, 2026 October 23, 2026\n17 Oppositions to any Fact Discovery July 23, 2026 November 2, 2026\n Motions\n18 Distribution of Class Notice July 2, 2026 November 2, 2026\n19 Replies to any Fact Discovery Motions August 6, 2026 November 9, 2026\n Completion of Fact Discovery August 20, 2026 November 23, 2026\n20 Expert Witness Reports September 25, 2026 December 14, 2026\n Exchange of Rebuttal Reports October 23, 2026 January 22, 2027\n21 Exchange of Reply Reports November 6, 2026 February 5, 2027\n22 Completion of Expert Discovery November 20, 2026 March 1, 2027\n Deadline to File Dispositive Motions December 11, 2026 March 19, 2027\n23 and Daubert Motions\n Oppositions to any Dispositive or January 8, 2027 April 16, 2027\n24 Daubert Motions\n Replies to any Dispositive or Daubert January 22, 2027 April 30, 2027\n25\n Motions\n26\n\n27\n\n28\n STIPULATED MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER \u2013 3\n No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ 1301 Second Avenue, Suite 2000, Seattle, WA 98101\n (206) 623-7292 OFFICE (206) 623-0594 FAX\n 011060-11/2847587 V2\n\f Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 163 Filed 07/01/26 Page 4 of 5\n\n\n\n\n 1 Event Current Deadline Proposed Deadline\n All motions in limine should be filed by February 12, 2027 May 21, 2027\n 2\n\n 3 All motions in limine shall be presented\n in a joint submission, which shall be\n 4 noted for the same day it is filed\n Agreed Pretrial Order due February 26, 2027 June 4, 2027\n 5 Trial Briefs, proposed voir dire February 26, 2027 June 4, 2027\n questions, and jury instructions due\n 6\n Pretrial Conference to be held at 10:00 April 9, 2027 July 16, 2027\n 7 AM on\n\n 8 IT IS SO STIPULATED.\n\n 9 DATED: July 1, 2026\n\n10 By: /s/ Steve W. Berman By: /s/ Peter B. Morrison\n Steve W. Berman, WSBA No. 12536 Peter B. Morrison (admitted pro hac vice)\n11 By: /s/ Catherine Y. N. Gannon Virginia F. Milstead (admitted pro hac vice)\n Catherine Y. N. Gannon, WSBA No. 47664 Winston Hsiao (admitted pro hac vice)\n12 By: /s/ Sean R. Matt SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER\n & FLOM, LLP\n Sean R. Matt, WSBA No. 21972 2000 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 200N\n13\n HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP Los Angeles, CA 90067\n14 1301 Second Avenue, Suite 2000 Telephone: (213) 687-5000\n Seattle, WA 98101 Peter.Morrison@skadden.com\n15 Telephone: (206) 623-7292 Virginia.Milstead@skadden.com\n steve@hbsslaw.com Winston.Hsiao@skadden.com\n16 catherineg@hbsslaw.com\n sean@hbsslaw.com By: /s/ Joseph E. Bringman\n17\n Joseph E. Bringman, WSBA No. 15236\n Lucas E. Gilmore (admitted pro hac vice) ASHURST PERKINS COIE US LLP\n18\n HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 1301 Second Avenue, Suite 4200\n19 715 Hearst Avenue, Suite 202 Seattle, Washington 98101-3804\n Berkeley, CA 94710 joe.bringman@ashurstperkins.com\n20 Telephone: (510) 725-3000\n lucasg@hbsslaw.com Attorneys for Defendants\n21\n Zillow Group, Inc., Richard Barton,\n22 Raffi Melanson (admitted pro hac vice) Allen Parker, and Jeremy Wacksman\n HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP\n23 1 Faneuil Hall Sq., 5th Floor\n Boston, MA 02109\n24 Telephone: (617) 482-3700\n raffim@hbsslaw.com\n25\n\n26 Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiff Jaeger\n\n27\n\n28\n STIPULATED MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER \u2013 4\n No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ 1301 Second Avenue, Suite 2000, Seattle, WA 98101\n (206) 623-7292 OFFICE (206) 623-0594 FAX\n 011060-11/2847587 V2\n\f Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 163 Filed 07/01/26 Page 5 of 5\n\n\n\n\n 1 Stacey M. Kaplan (admitted pro hac vice)\n KESSLER TOPAZ MELTZER\n 2 & CHECK, LLP\n One Sansome Street, Suite 1850\n 3 San Francisco, CA 94104\n Telephone: (415) 400-3000\n 4 skaplan@ktmc.com\n 5\n Gregory M. Castaldo (admitted pro hac vice)\n 6 Evan R. Hoey (admitted pro hac vice)\n KESSLER TOPAZ MELTZER\n 7 & CHECK, LLP\n 280 King of Prussia Road\n 8 Radnor, PA 19087\n Telephone: (610) 667-7706\n 9 gcastaldo@ktmc.com\n ehoey@ktmc.com\n10\n\n11 Additional Counsel for Lead Plaintiff Jaeger\n\n12\n\n13\n\n14\n\n15\n\n16\n\n17\n\n18\n\n19\n\n20\n\n21\n\n22\n\n23\n\n24\n\n25\n\n26\n\n27\n\n28\n STIPULATED MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER \u2013 5\n No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ 1301 Second Avenue, Suite 2000, Seattle, WA 98101\n (206) 623-7292 OFFICE (206) 623-0594 FAX\n 011060-11/2847587 V2\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2026-07-01T15:24:44.462197-07:00","document_number":"163","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"197012528000","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Stipulated Motion","acms_document_guid":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/484830297/","id":484830297,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/61471283/163/1/jaeger-v-zillow-group-inc/","date_created":"2026-07-01T15:24:33.615831-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-01T15:24:33.615854-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":3,"file_size":40702,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"163","attachment_number":1,"pacer_doc_id":"197012528001","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":2,"description":"Proposed Order","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-07-01T12:20:58.721772-07:00","date_modified":"2026-08-06T00:15:40.759710-07:00","date_filed":"2026-07-01","time_filed":"11:48:09","entry_number":163,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-07-01.001","pacer_sequence_number":547,"description":"Stipulated MOTION to Amend Scheduling Order, filed by Plaintiff Jeremy Jaeger. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 7/1/2026, (Berman, Steve) (Entered: 07/01/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/469344854/","id":469344854,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/484677432/","id":484677432,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/61471283/162/jaeger-v-zillow-group-inc/","date_created":"2026-06-30T17:08:35.477294-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-06T06:12:15.521880-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"162","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"197012526668","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-06-30T17:08:35.440003-07:00","date_modified":"2026-08-06T00:15:40.724636-07:00","date_filed":"2026-06-30","time_filed":"16:54:37","entry_number":162,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-06-30.001","pacer_sequence_number":545,"description":"NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL: Attorney Sean C Knowles for Defendants Richard Barton, Allen Parker, Zillow Group Inc. (Knowles, Sean) (Entered: 06/30/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/468098236/","id":468098236,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/483380066/","id":483380066,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"","date_created":"2026-06-18T17:28:50.431949-07:00","date_modified":"2026-06-18T17:28:50.438155-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order on Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-06-18T17:28:50.417395-07:00","date_modified":"2026-06-18T17:28:50.417408-07:00","date_filed":"2026-06-18","time_filed":"16:29:18","entry_number":null,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-06-18.001","pacer_sequence_number":null,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/468093994/","id":468093994,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/483375601/","id":483375601,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/61471283/160/jaeger-v-zillow-group-inc/","date_created":"2026-06-18T16:26:24.301159-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-06T06:12:15.351671-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"160","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"197012503289","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice{htmlNbsp}","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-06-18T16:26:24.259415-07:00","date_modified":"2026-08-11T12:26:56.461222-07:00","date_filed":"2026-06-18","time_filed":"15:36:21","entry_number":160,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-06-18.002","pacer_sequence_number":536,"description":"APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Manuel F. Cachan FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendants Richard Barton, Allen Parker, Jeremy Wacksman, Zillow Group Inc (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-9770078 (Knowles, Sean) . (Entered: 06/18/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/466082497/","id":466082497,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/481305800/","id":481305800,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/61471283/159/jaeger-v-zillow-group-inc/","date_created":"2026-06-02T16:16:09.689724-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-06T06:12:15.068384-07:00","sha1":"37957600e82f4b715d6936ad1ac0f8f6e64b302c","page_count":10,"file_size":209480,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.wawd.305262/gov.uscourts.wawd.305262.159.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.wawd.305262/gov.uscourts.wawd.305262.159.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":" Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 159 Filed 06/02/26 Page 1 of 10\n\n\n\n\n 1\n\n 2\n\n 3\n\n 4\n\n 5\n\n 6\n UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON\n AT SEATTLE\n 8\n\n 9\n JEREMY JAEGER, on behalf of himself Case No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ\n10 and all others similarly situated,\n STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER FOR\n11 Plaintiff, APPROVAL OF CLASS NOTICE\n12\n v.\n13\n ZILLOW GROUP, INC., et al.,\n14\n Defendants.\n15\n\n16\n\n17\n\n18\n\n19\n\n20\n\n21\n\n22\n\n23\n\n24\n\n25\n\n26\n\n27\n\n28\n STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER FOR\n APPROVAL OF CLASS NOTICE\n No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ\n\f Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 159 Filed 06/02/26 Page 2 of 10\n\n\n\n\n 1 The parties, by and through their attorneys of record, respectfully request the Court enter\n\n 2 the proposed order set forth below regarding approval of Class Notice.\n\n 3 In support of their request the parties represent the following to the Court:\n\n 4 WHEREAS, by an Order, docket no. 137, dated August 23, 2024, the Court certified the\n\n 5 above-captioned action (the \u201cAction\u201d) to proceed as a class action on behalf of a Class consisting\n\n 6 of:\n\n 7 All persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired Zillow\n Group, Inc. Class A common stock or Class C capital stock during\n 8 the period from August 5, 2021, to November 2, 2021, inclusive (the\n \u201cClass Period\u201d), and were damaged thereby.\n 9\n\n10 WHEREAS, Defendants filed a petition for leave to review the certification Order under\n\n11 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (\u201cFRCP\u201d) 23(f), which was granted on October 24, 2024, see\n\n12 Order (docket no. 147), and therefore this Court entered a stay of proceedings until Defendants\u2019\n\n13 Rule 23(f) Appeal was resolved. Minute Order (docket no. 149).\n\n14 WHEREAS, the Ninth Circuit entered a memorandum opinion, docket no. 151, on\n\n15 September 26, 2025, affirming the Court\u2019s certification Order and remanded the case back to the\n\n16 district court on January 14, 2026, see Mandate (docket no. 155).\n\n17 WHEREAS, on February 19, 2026, this Court lifted the stay, entered a new case\n\n18 schedule, and directed the parties to file a joint status report on a proposed class notice plan no\n\n19 later than March 16, 2026. Minute Order at 2 (docket no. 157). The Parties, having conferred,\n\n20 stipulate and, subject to the Court\u2019s approval, agree as follows:\n\n21 1. The Parties agree to the use of the form of the Notice of Pendency of Class Action\n\n22 (the \u201cLong Notice\u201d), the Summary Notice of Pendency of Class Action (the \u201cSummary Notice\u201d),\n\n23 and the proposed Postcard Notice of Pendency of Class Action (\u201cPostcard Notice\u201d). 1 See\n\n24 Exs. 1\u20133 (docket nos. 158-1, 158-2, & 158-3). The Parties also agree to use the proposed form\n\n25 entitled Request to be Excluded from the Class (\u201cOpt-Out Form\u201d). See Ex. 4 (docket nos. 158-4).\n\n26\n 1\n The Long Notice, Summary Notice, and Postcard Notice are collectively referred to as the\n27\n \u201cNotices.\u201d\n28\n STIPULATED MOTION & ORDER FOR\n APPROVAL OF CLASS NOTICE \u2013 1\n No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ\n\f Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 159 Filed 06/02/26 Page 3 of 10\n\n\n\n\n 1 The Declaration of Paul Mulholland, President of Strategic Claims Services, Inc., Regarding\n\n 2 Providing Notice of Class Certification to Members of the Class (\u201cMulholland Declaration\u201d) sets\n\n 3 out additional detail on the qualification and experience of Strategic Claims Services, Inc.\n\n 4 (\u201cSCS\u201d), as well as its proposed role in disseminating class notice in this matter. See Ex. 5\n\n 5 (docket nos. 158-5).\n\n 6 2. The proposed form and content of the Notices meet the requirements of FRCP\n\n 7 23(c)(2)(B), as they clearly and concisely state in plain and easily understood language all of the\n\n 8 following: (a) the nature of the Action; (b) the definition of the certified Class; (c) the Class\n\n 9 claims, issues, or defenses; (d) a Class Member\u2019s right to enter an appearance through an\n\n10 attorney if the member so desires; (e) a Class Member\u2019s right to be excluded from the Class; (f)\n\n11 the time and manner for requesting exclusion; and (g) the binding effect of a Class judgment on\n\n12 members under FRCP 23(c)(3). The Notices, method, and schedule set forth below for notifying\n\n13 the Class of the pendency of the Action as a class action meet the requirements of FRCP 23 and\n\n14 of due process, constitute the best notice practicable under the circumstances, and shall constitute\n\n15 due and sufficient notice to all persons and entities entitled thereto.\n\n16 3. Plaintiff selects Strategic Claims Services, Inc. as the Notice Administrator.\n\n17 4. Defendant Zillow Group, Inc. (\u201cZillow\u201d) shall use reasonable efforts to, within\n\n18 twenty-one (21) calendar days after entry of this Order for Approval of Notice and Summary\n\n19 Notice and at no cost to the Class, have its transfer agent provide or cause to be provided to the\n\n20 Notice Administrator security holder records (consisting of the security holder names, addresses,\n\n21 and email addresses to the extent the transfer agent has access to them) in electronic form,\n\n22 identifying all persons or entities who purchased Zillow securities during the period from August\n\n23 5, 2021 to November 2, 2021, both dates inclusive. Class Counsel shall be responsible for all\n\n24 other costs associated with disseminating the Notices.\n\n25 5. Not later than thirty (30) calendar days from entry of this Order (\u201cNotice Date\u201d),\n\n26 the Notice Administrator shall distribute the Notices, as outlined in the Mulholland Declaration,\n\n27 and substantially in the form of Exhibits 1\u20133 (docket nos. 158-1, 158-2, & 158-3), to be either (a)\n\n28\n STIPULATED MOTION & ORDER FOR\n APPROVAL OF CLASS NOTICE \u2013 2\n No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ\n\f Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 159 Filed 06/02/26 Page 4 of 10\n\n\n\n\n 1 emailed to Class Members for whom the Notice Administrator is able to obtain email addresses\n\n 2 or (b) mailed, by first-class mail, postage prepaid, to Class Members at the addresses set forth in\n\n 3 the records provided by Zillow\u2019s transfer agent, if no email address can be obtained, or who may\n\n 4 otherwise be identified with reasonable effort.\n\n 5 6. The Notice Administrator shall use reasonable efforts to give notice to Nominees 2\n\n 6 such as brokerage firms and other persons and entities who may have, for the beneficial interest\n\n 7 of any person or entity other than itself or themselves, purchased Zillow securities during the\n\n 8 period from August 5, 2021, to November 2, 2021, both dates inclusive. Ex. 5 at \u00b6\u00b6 6\u20137 (docket\n\n 9 no. 158-5). Such Nominees shall, within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of the Notice, either:\n\n10 (a) request sufficient copies of the Postcard Notice from the Notice Administrator\n\n11 to mail to the beneficial owners and, within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of\n\n12 those Postcard Notices, mail the Postcard Notice to all such beneficial owners; or\n\n13 (b) request the link to the electronic copy of the Long Notice from the Notice\n\n14 Administrator and, within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of the link to the\n\n15 electronic Long Notice, email the Long Notice to beneficial owners; or\n\n16 (c) provide a list of the names, addresses, and email addresses, to the extent email\n\n17 addresses are available, of all such beneficial owners to the Notice Administrator,\n\n18 whereafter the Notice Administrator is ordered to send the Postcard Notice\n\n19 promptly to such identified beneficial owners.\n\n20 7. If the Notice Administrator receives an email address for a beneficial owner, the\n\n21 Notice Administrator shall email the Notice to the beneficial owner. Nominees who elect to send\n\n22 the Postcard Notice to their beneficial owners shall send a statement to the Notice Administrator\n\n23 confirming that the mailing of the Postcard Notice and/or emailing of the link to the electronic\n\n24 Long Notice was made and shall retain their mailing and/or emailing records for use in\n\n25\n\n26 2\n It is anticipated that a large majority of Class Members will be beneficial purchasers who\n hold their securities in \u201cstreet name,\u201d i.e., the securities are purchased by banks, brokers, and\n27 other entities known as Nominees. The Notice Administrator has identified approximately 2,400\n28 Nominees and this list is continuously monitored and updated as needed.\n STIPULATED MOTION & ORDER FOR\n APPROVAL OF CLASS NOTICE \u2013 3\n No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ\n\f Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 159 Filed 06/02/26 Page 5 of 10\n\n\n\n\n 1 connection with any further notices that may be provided in the Action. Upon full compliance\n\n 2 with these directions, such Nominees may seek reimbursement of their reasonable expenses\n\n 3 actually incurred by providing the Notice Administrator with proper documentation supporting\n\n 4 the expenses for which reimbursement is sought. The reimbursement to Nominees shall not\n\n 5 exceed $0.02 per name, address, and email address provided to the Notice Administrator; $0.02\n\n 6 per link to the Long Notice actually emailed by Nominees; or $0.02 plus postage at the current\n\n 7 pre-sort rate used by the Notice Administrator per Postcard Notice mailed directly to beneficial\n\n 8 owners by Nominees.\n\n 9 8. Contemporaneously with the mailing of the Postcard Notice, the Notice\n\n10 Administrator shall cause a copy of the Notices, substantially in the form of Exhibits 1\u20133 (docket\n\n11 nos. 158-1, 158-2, & 158-3), to be posted on the Notice Administrator\u2019s website,\n\n12 www.JaegervZillowLitigation.com. Ex. 5 at \u00b6\u00b6 5, 8 (docket no. 158-5). Class Members will be\n\n13 able to download copies of the Notices. Id. at \u00b6 8. The case website will also provide an\n\n14 overview of the case and highlight important dates, such as the Exclusion Deadline. The Notice\n\n15 Administrator will also post on the case website the proposed Opt-Out Form.\n\n16 9. The Notice Administrator shall cause a copy of the Summary Notice, substantially\n\n17 in the form of Exhibit 2 (docket no. 158-2), to be published once in Investor\u2019s Business Daily\n\n18 and issued once over Globe Newswire, each within ten (10) calendar days of the mailing of the\n\n19 Postcard Notice. Ex. 5 at \u00b6 5 (docket no. 158-5).\n\n20 10. The Notice Administrator will also maintain a toll-free telephone number and\n\n21 email address that will be staffed with customer service representatives trained to answer\n\n22 questions about the Action. Id. at \u00b6 8.\n\n23 11. Class Members shall be bound by all determinations and judgments in this\n\n24 Action, whether favorable or unfavorable, unless such persons and entities request exclusion\n\n25 from the Class in a timely and proper manner, as hereinafter provided. A Class Member wishing\n\n26 to be excluded from the Class shall mail a written request by first class mail, postmarked no later\n\n27 than 60 calendar days from the Notice Date, to the address designated in the Notice. Such request\n\n28\n STIPULATED MOTION & ORDER FOR\n APPROVAL OF CLASS NOTICE \u2013 4\n No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ\n\f Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 159 Filed 06/02/26 Page 6 of 10\n\n\n\n\n 1 for exclusion shall clearly state that the Class Member requests exclusion from the Class in\n\n 2 Jaeger v. Zillow Group Inc., et al., Case No.: 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ, and it must: (i) state the name,\n\n 3 address, telephone number, and email address of the person or entity requesting exclusion; (ii)\n\n 4 state the number of Zillow securities purchased, acquired, sold, and/or disposed during the Class\n\n 5 Period, as well as the dates and prices of each such purchase, acquisition, sale, and/or\n\n 6 disposition; (iii) be signed by the person or entity requesting exclusion, or an authorized\n\n 7 representative thereof; and (iv) include account documentation reflecting the person or entity\u2019s\n\n 8 purchase and sale of Zillow securities during the Class Period. The request for exclusion shall\n\n 9 not be effective unless it provides the required information and is made within the time stated\n\n10 above, or the exclusion is otherwise accepted by the Court.\n\n11 12. Any Class Member who retains separate counsel in connection with this matter\n\n12 must enter an appearance, as set out in the Long Notice, no later than seventy-five (75) calendar\n\n13 days after the Notice Date. Within eighty (80) calendar days after the Notice Date, Class Counsel\n\n14 will forward to counsel for Defendants any notices of appearance that were mailed to Class\n\n15 Counsel but not filed with the Court.\n\n16 13. Class Counsel shall file with the Court proof of mailing of the Postcard Notice,\n\n17 proof of publication of the Summary Notice, and proof of posting of the Notice on the Notice\n\n18 Administrator\u2019s website within ten (10) calendar days following the Summary Notice publication\n\n19 date. Class Counsel shall also file with the Court an affidavit setting forth a list of all persons and\n\n20 entities who have validly and timely requested exclusion from the Class within fourteen (14)\n\n21 calendar days following the expiration of the exclusion deadline.\n\n22 14. At minimum, the Notice Administrator will perform the following tasks to\n\n23 complete adequate notice to Class Members: (1) set up a case website which will host copies of\n\n24 the Long Notice, Summary Notice, Postcard Notice, Opt-Out Form, operative Complaint,\n\n25 relevant Court orders, and all other pertinent information for Class Members; (2) assist in\n\n26 preparing the Long Notice, Summary Notice, Postcard Notice, Opt-Out Form, and the email link\n\n27 to the electronic Long Notice; (3) notify Nominees of the appropriate manner to provide the\n\n28\n STIPULATED MOTION & ORDER FOR\n APPROVAL OF CLASS NOTICE \u2013 5\n No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ\n\f Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 159 Filed 06/02/26 Page 7 of 10\n\n\n\n\n 1 Notices to potential Class Members who are beneficial holders; (4) set up a database for Class\n\n 2 Members\u2019 information, a phone system, and a frequently asked questions protocol for use by the\n\n 3 Notice Administrator\u2019s customer service representatives; (5) perform email verification for all\n\n 4 emails received and perform National Change of Address search for pre-mailings of the Postcard\n\n 5 Notice; (6) disseminate, by email, where possible, or by mailed Postcard Notice, notice to Class\n\n 6 Members who can be identified with reasonable effort; (7) publish the Summary Notice once\n\n 7 over the Globe Newswire and once in the Investors\u2019 Business Daily; (8) perform skip-tracing for\n\n 8 Postcard Notices returned to SCS as undeliverable; (9) update the Class information database to\n\n 9 include updated contact information and other updated information regarding Class Members;\n\n10 (10) handle and respond to all phone call questions from Class Members; (11) respond to all\n\n11 other questions via e-mails, letters, and other correspondence from Class Members; (12)\n\n12 correspond with brokers and institutions to answer any questions and assist with any information\n\n13 concerning administrative matters regarding the Action; (13) review and process all opt-out\n\n14 requests; (14) prepare declarations as required by the Court throughout the administration\n\n15 process; and (15) perform all other actions as directed by Lead Plaintiff\u2019s counsel or the Court.\n\n16 Ex. 5 at \u00b6 9 (docket no. 158-5).\n\n17 15. Below is a table of the material notice dates described above.\n\n18 Event Date\n19 Order granting stipulation for class notice Order Date\n and summary notice (\u201cOrder Date\u201d)\n20 Zillow or its transfer agent provides 21 days after Order Date\n21 security holder records identifying all\n persons or entities who purchased Zillow\n22 securities during the Class Period to the\n Notice Administrator\n23\n Notice Administrator distributes Notices 30 days after Order Date\n24 and publishes case website (\u201cNotice\n Date\u201d)\n25\n\n26\n\n27\n\n28\n STIPULATED MOTION & ORDER FOR\n APPROVAL OF CLASS NOTICE \u2013 6\n No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ\n\f Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 159 Filed 06/02/26 Page 8 of 10\n\n\n\n\n 1 Notice Administrator facilitates 10 days after Notice Date\n publication of the Summary Notice in\n 2\n Investor\u2019s Business Daily and in Globe\n 3 Newswire (\u201cNotice Publication Date\u201d)\n Exclusion Deadline 60 days after Notice Date\n 4\n Appearance Deadline for attorneys acting 75 days after Notice Date\n 5 as separate counsel on behalf of any Class\n Members\n 6\n Class counsel files proof of dissemination 10 days after Notice Publication Date\n 7 of Notices\n Class counsel files affidavit identifying all 14 days after Exclusion Deadline\n 8 persons and/or entities who have\n 9 requested exclusion\n\n10 IT IS SO STIPULATED.\n11 DATED: March 16, 2026\n12\n By: /s/ Steve W. Berman By: /s/ Peter B. Morrison\n13 Steve W. Berman, WSBA No. 12536 Peter B. Morrison (admitted pro hac vice)\n By: /s/ Catherine Y. N. Gannon Virginia F. Milstead (admitted pro hac vice)\n14 Winston Hsiao (admitted pro hac vice)\n Catherine Y. N. Gannon, WSBA No. 47664\n By: /s/ Sean R. Matt SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER\n15 & FLOM, LLP\n Sean R. Matt, WSBA No. 21972 300 South Grand Avenue, Suite 3400\n16 HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP Los Angeles, CA 90071\n 1301 Second Avenue, Suite 2000 Telephone: (213) 687-5000\n17 Seattle, WA 98101 Facsimile: (213) 521-5000\n Telephone: (206) 623-7292 Peter.Morrison@skadden.com\n18\n Facsimile: (206) 623-0594 Virginia.Milstead@skadden.com\n19 steve@hbsslaw.com Winston.Hsiao@skadden.com\n catherineg@hbsslaw.com\n20 sean@hbsslaw.com By: /s/ Sean C. Knowles\n Sean C. Knowles, WSBA No. 39893\n21 Lucas E. Gilmore (admitted pro hac vice) PERKINS COIE LLP\n HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900\n22 715 Hearst Avenue, Suite 202 Seattle, WA 98101\n Berkeley, CA 94710 Telephone: (206) 359-8000\n23\n Telephone: (510) 725-3000 Facsimile: (206) 359-9000\n24 Facsimile: (510) 725-3001 SKnowles@perkinscoie.com\n lucasg@hbsslaw.com\n25 Attorneys for Defendants\n Zillow Group, Inc., Richard Barton,\n26\n Allen Parker, and Jeremy Wacksman\n27\n\n28\n STIPULATED MOTION & ORDER FOR\n APPROVAL OF CLASS NOTICE \u2013 7\n No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ\n\f Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 159 Filed 06/02/26 Page 9 of 10\n\n\n\n\n 1 Raffi Melanson (admitted pro hac vice)\n HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP\n 2 1 Faneuil Hall Sq., 5th Floor\n Boston, MA 02109\n 3\n Telephone: (617) 482-3700\n 4 Facsimile: (617) 482-3003\n\n 5 Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiff Jaeger\n 6 Stacey M. Kaplan (admitted pro hac vice)\n KESSLER TOPAZ MELTZER\n 7 & CHECK, LLP\n 8 One Sansome Street, Suite 1850\n San Francisco, CA 94104\n 9 Telephone: (415) 400-3000\n Facsimile: (415) 400-3001\n10 skaplan@ktmc.com\n\n11 Gregory M. Castaldo (admitted pro hac vice)\n Evan R. Hoey (admitted pro hac vice)\n12 KESSLER TOPAZ MELTZER\n & CHECK, LLP\n13 280 King of Prussia Road\n Radnor, PA 19087\n14\n Telephone: (610) 667-7706\n15 Facsimile: (610) 667-7056\n gcastaldo@ktmc.com\n16 ehoey@ktmc.com\n\n17 Additional Counsel for Lead Plaintiff Jaeger\n\n18\n\n19\n\n20\n\n21\n\n22\n\n23\n\n24\n\n25\n\n26\n\n27\n\n28\n STIPULATED MOTION & ORDER FOR\n APPROVAL OF CLASS NOTICE \u2013 8\n No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ\n\f Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 159 Filed 06/02/26 Page 10 of 10\n\n\n\n\n 1 ORDER\n\n 2 (1) The parties\u2019 Stipulated Motion for Approval of Class Notice, docket no. 158, is\n\n 3 GRANTED as follows:\n\n 4 (a) The Court APPROVES Plaintiff\u2019s selection of Strategic Claims Services,\n\n 5 Inc. as the Notice Administrator, and the parties\u2019 proposed Long Notice, Summary\n\n 6 Notice, Opt-Out Form, and class notice plan.\n\n 7 (b) The parties\u2019 Postcard Notice, Ex. 3 (docket no. 158-3), does not satisfy the\n\n 8 requirements of FRCP 23(c)(2)(B)(iv) and (vii). Therefore, paragraph 4 of the Postcard\n\n 9 Notice, Ex. 3 (docket no. 158-3 at 4), is MODIFIED to read as follows:\n\n10 If you are and decide to remain a member of the Class, please visit the\n website below to register so that if any further notices are disseminated\n11 in connection with the Action, you will receive them. Inquiries, other\n than requests for the Notice, may be made to Class Counsel: Steve W.\n12\n Berman, Esq., Catherine Y.N. Gannon, Esq., Christopher O\u2019Hara, Esq.,\n13 Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, 1301 Second Avenue, Suite 2000,\n Seattle, WA 98101. If you are a Class Member, you have the right to\n14 decide whether to remain a member of the Class. If you choose to\n remain a member of the Class, you do not need to do anything at\n15 this time other than to retain your documentation reflecting your\n transactions in Zillow securities. You will be represented by Class\n16\n Counsel appointed by the Court unless you retain your own counsel at\n17 your own expense and your counsel enters an appearance on your\n behalf by ______________, 202_. Regardless of whether you appear\n18 by your own counsel, if you are a Class Member and do not exclude\n yourself from the Class, you will be bound by the proceedings in this\n19 Action, including all orders and judgments of the Court, whether\n20 favorable or unfavorable. You will automatically be included in the\n Class unless you exclude yourself from the Class.\n21\n (2) The clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to all counsel of record.\n22\n IT IS SO ORDERED.\n23\n Dated this 2nd day of June, 2026.\n24\n\n25 A\n26 Thomas S. Zilly\n United States District Judge\n27\n\n28\n STIPULATED MOTION & ORDER FOR\n APPROVAL OF CLASS NOTICE \u2013 9\n No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2026-07-01T15:42:22.584737-07:00","document_number":"159","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"197012465613","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order on Stipulated Motion","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-06-02T16:16:09.653085-07:00","date_modified":"2026-08-06T00:15:40.598409-07:00","date_filed":"2026-06-02","time_filed":"15:44:39","entry_number":159,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-06-02.001","pacer_sequence_number":534,"description":"ORDER granting the Parties' 158 Stipulated Motion for Approval of Class Notice as follows:(a) The Court APPROVES Plaintiff's selection of Strategic Claims Services, Inc. as the Notice Administrator, and the parties' proposed Long Notice, Summary Notice, Opt-Out Form, and class notice plan.(b) The parties' Postcard Notice, Ex. 3 (docket no. 158 -3), does not satisfy the requirements of FRCP 23(c)(2)(B)(iv) and (vii). Therefore, paragraph 4 of the Postcard Notice, Ex. 3 (docket no. 158 -3 at 4), is MODIFIED. (See Order.)Signed by Judge Thomas S. Zilly.(CJS) (Entered: 06/02/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/461006728/","id":461006728,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/476087976/","id":476087976,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"","date_created":"2026-04-16T11:35:03.407767-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-06T06:12:12.416365-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Set/Reset Deadlines","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-04-16T11:35:03.386952-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-06T06:12:12.377934-07:00","date_filed":"2024-08-27","time_filed":null,"entry_number":null,"recap_sequence_number":"2024-08-27.002","pacer_sequence_number":null,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/461006721/","id":461006721,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/476087962/","id":476087962,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"","date_created":"2026-04-16T11:34:57.684158-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-06T06:12:00.887939-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Terminate Motions","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-04-16T11:34:57.665171-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-06T06:12:00.824343-07:00","date_filed":"2022-06-28","time_filed":null,"entry_number":null,"recap_sequence_number":"2022-06-28.001","pacer_sequence_number":null,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/461006707/","id":461006707,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/476087948/","id":476087948,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"","date_created":"2026-04-16T11:34:54.857699-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-06T06:11:54.790111-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Note re compliance with LCR 83.2","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-04-16T11:34:54.839696-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-06T06:11:54.747067-07:00","date_filed":"2022-01-27","time_filed":null,"entry_number":null,"recap_sequence_number":"2022-01-27.002","pacer_sequence_number":null,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/461006706/","id":461006706,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/476087947/","id":476087947,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"","date_created":"2026-04-16T11:34:54.762458-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-06T06:11:54.582226-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Set/Reset Motion Noting Date","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-04-16T11:34:54.737551-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-06T06:11:54.546554-07:00","date_filed":"2022-01-21","time_filed":null,"entry_number":null,"recap_sequence_number":"2022-01-21.001","pacer_sequence_number":null,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/461006704/","id":461006704,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/476087945/","id":476087945,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"","date_created":"2026-04-16T11:34:54.616804-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-06T06:11:54.400782-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Note re compliance with LCR 83.2","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-04-16T11:34:54.597721-07:00","date_modified":"2026-08-11T12:26:55.693311-07:00","date_filed":"2022-01-19","time_filed":null,"entry_number":null,"recap_sequence_number":"2022-01-19.006","pacer_sequence_number":null,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/457370816/","id":457370816,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/472353490/","id":472353490,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/61471283/158/jaeger-v-zillow-group-inc/","date_created":"2026-03-16T18:20:23.148575-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-06T06:12:14.933614-07:00","sha1":"8d0ba3479f0b6f65eb3ef14570a5e3b18cbdf4eb","page_count":11,"file_size":400051,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.wawd.305262/gov.uscourts.wawd.305262.158.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.wawd.305262/gov.uscourts.wawd.305262.158.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":" Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 158 Filed 03/16/26 Page 1 of 11\n\n\n\n\n 1 The Honorable Thomas S. Zilly\n\n 2\n\n 3\n\n 4\n\n 5\n\n 6\n\n 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON\n 8 AT SEATTLE\n 9\n\n10 JEREMY JAEGER, on behalf of himself No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ\n and all others similarly situated,\n11 STIPULATED MOTION & [PROPOSED]\n Plaintiff, ORDER FOR APPROVAL OF CLASS\n12\n NOTICE\n13 v.\n NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR:\n14 ZILLOW GROUP, INC., et al., March 16, 2026\n\n15 Defendants.\n16\n\n17\n\n18\n\n19\n\n20\n\n21\n\n22\n\n23\n\n24\n\n25\n\n26\n\n27\n\n28\n STIPULATED MOTION & [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR\n APPROVAL OF CLASS NOTICE\n No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ\n 011060-11/2847587 V2\n\f Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 158 Filed 03/16/26 Page 2 of 11\n\n\n\n\n 1 The parties, by and through their attorneys of record, respectfully request the Court enter\n\n 2 the proposed order set forth below regarding approval of Class Notice.\n\n 3 In support of their request the parties represent the following to the Court:\n\n 4 WHEREAS, by an Order dated August 23, 2024, the Court certified the above-captioned\n\n 5 action (the \u201cAction\u201d) to proceed as a class action on behalf of a Class consisting of:\n\n 6 All persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired Zillow\n Group, Inc. Class A common stock or Class C capital stock during the\n 7 period from August 5, 2021, to November 2, 2021, inclusive (the\n \u201cClass Period\u201d), and were damaged thereby.\n 8\n\n 9 WHEREAS, Defendants filed a petition for leave to review the certification Order under\n\n10 Rule 23(f), which was granted on October 24, 2024, and therefore this Court entered a stay of\n\n11 proceedings until Defendants\u2019 Rule 23(f) Appeal was resolved. Dkt. 149.\n\n12 WHEREAS, the Ninth Circuit entered a memorandum opinion on September 26, 2025,\n\n13 affirming the Court\u2019s certification Order and remanded the case back to the district court on\n\n14 January 14, 2026.\n\n15 WHEREAS, on February 19, 2026, this Court lifted the stay, entered a new case schedule,\n\n16 and directed the parties to file a joint status report on a proposed class notice plan no later than\n\n17 March 16, 2026. Dkt. 157. The Parties, having conferred, stipulate and, subject to the Court\u2019s\n\n18 approval, agree as follows:\n\n19 1. The Parties agree to the use of the form of the Notice of Pendency of Class Action\n\n20 (the \u201cLong Notice\u201d), the Summary Notice of Pendency of Class Action (the \u201cSummary Notice\u201d),\n\n21 and the proposed Postcard Notice of Pendency of Class Action (\u201cPostcard Notice\u201d) attached as\n\n22 Exhibits 1, 2, and 3, respectively. 1 The Parties also agree to use the proposed form entitled\n\n23 Request to be Excluded from the Class (\u201cOpt-Out Form\u201d), attached as Exhibit 4. The Parties also\n\n24 attach as Exhibit 5, the Declaration of Paul Mulholland, President of Strategic Claims Services,\n\n25 Inc., Regarding Providing Notice of Class Certification to Members of the Class (\u201cMulholland\n\n26 Declaration\u201d) which sets out additional detail on the qualification and experience of Strategic\n\n27\n 1\n The Long Notice, Summary Notice, and Postcard Notice are collectively referred to as the\n28 \u201cNotices.\u201d\n STIPULATED MOTION & [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR\n APPROVAL OF CLASS NOTICE \u2013 1\n No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ\n 011060-11/2847587 V2\n\f Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 158 Filed 03/16/26 Page 3 of 11\n\n\n\n\n 1 Claims Services, Inc. (\u201cSCS\u201d), as well as its proposed role in disseminating class notice in this\n\n 2 matter.\n\n 3 2. The proposed form and content of the Notices meet the requirements of Rule\n\n 4 23(c)(2)(B), as they clearly and concisely state in plain and easily understood language all of the\n\n 5 following: (a) the nature of the Action; (b) the definition of the certified Class; (c) the Class\n\n 6 claims, issues, or defenses; (d) a Class Member\u2019s right to enter an appearance through an\n\n 7 attorney if the member so desires; (e) a Class Member\u2019s right to be excluded from the Class; (f)\n\n 8 the time and manner for requesting exclusion; and (g) the binding effect of a Class judgment on\n\n 9 members under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(c)(3). The Notices, method, and schedule set\n\n10 forth below for notifying the Class of the pendency of the Action as a class action meet the\n\n11 requirements of Rule 23 and of due process, constitute the best notice practicable under the\n\n12 circumstances, and shall constitute due and sufficient notice to all persons and entities entitled\n\n13 thereto.\n\n14 3. Plaintiff selects Strategic Claims Services, Inc. as the Notice Administrator.\n\n15 4. Defendant Zillow Group, Inc. (\u201cZillow\u201d) shall use reasonable efforts to, within\n\n16 twenty-one (21) calendar days after entry of the accompanying Order for Approval of Notice and\n\n17 Summary Notice (the \u201cOrder\u201d) and at no cost to the Class, have its transfer agent provide or\n\n18 cause to be provided to the Notice Administrator security holder records (consisting of the\n\n19 security holder names, addresses, and email addresses to the extent the transfer agent has access\n\n20 to them) in electronic form, identifying all persons or entities who purchased Zillow securities\n\n21 during the period from August 5, 2021 to November 2, 2021, both dates inclusive. Class Counsel\n\n22 shall be responsible for all other costs associated with disseminating the Notices.\n\n23 5. Not later than thirty (30) calendar days from entry of the Order (\u201cNotice Date\u201d),\n\n24 the Notice Administrator shall distribute the Notices, as outlined in the Mulholland Declaration,\n\n25 and substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibits 1-3, to be either (a) emailed to Class\n\n26 Members for whom the Notice Administrator is able to obtain email addresses or (b) mailed, by\n\n27 first-class mail, postage prepaid, to Class Members at the addresses set forth in the records\n\n28\n STIPULATED MOTION & [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR\n APPROVAL OF CLASS NOTICE \u2013 2\n No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ\n 011060-11/2847587 V2\n\f Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 158 Filed 03/16/26 Page 4 of 11\n\n\n\n\n 1 provided by Zillow\u2019s transfer agent, if no email address can be obtained, or who may otherwise\n\n 2 be identified with reasonable effort.\n\n 3 6. The Notice Administrator shall use reasonable efforts to give notice to Nominees 2\n\n 4 such as brokerage firms and other persons and entities who may have, for the beneficial interest\n\n 5 of any person or entity other than itself or themselves, purchased Zillow securities during the\n\n 6 period from August 5, 2021, to November 2, 2021, both dates inclusive. Ex. 5 at \u00b6\u00b6 6-7. Such\n\n 7 Nominees shall, within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of the Notice, either:\n\n 8 (a) request sufficient copies of the Postcard Notice from the Notice Administrator\n\n 9 to mail to the beneficial owners and, within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of\n\n10 those Postcard Notices, mail the Postcard Notice to all such beneficial owners; or\n\n11 (b) request the link to the electronic copy of the Long Notice from the Notice\n\n12 Administrator and, within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of the link to the\n\n13 electronic Long Notice, email the Long Notice to beneficial owners; or\n\n14 (c) provide a list of the names, addresses, and email addresses, to the extent email\n\n15 addresses are available, of all such beneficial owners to the Notice Administrator,\n\n16 where after the Notice Administrator is ordered to send the Postcard Notice\n\n17 promptly to such identified beneficial owners.\n\n18 7. If the Notice Administrator receives an email address for a beneficial owner, the\n\n19 Notice Administrator shall email the Notice to the beneficial owner. Nominees who elect to send\n\n20 the Postcard Notice to their beneficial owners shall send a statement to the Notice Administrator\n\n21 confirming that the mailing of the Postcard Notice and/or emailing of the link to the electronic\n\n22 Long Notice was made and shall retain their mailing and/or emailing records for use in\n\n23 connection with any further notices that may be provided in the Action. Id. Upon full compliance\n\n24 with these directions, such Nominees may seek reimbursement of their reasonable expenses\n\n25 actually incurred by providing the Notice Administrator with proper documentation supporting\n\n26\n 2\n It is anticipated that a large majority of Class Members will be beneficial purchasers who\n27 hold their securities in \u201cstreet name,\u201d i.e., the securities are purchased by banks, brokers, and other\n entities known as Nominees. The Notice Administrator has identified approximately 2,400\n28 Nominees and this list is continuously monitored and updated as needed.\n STIPULATED MOTION & [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR\n APPROVAL OF CLASS NOTICE \u2013 3\n No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ\n 011060-11/2847587 V2\n\f Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 158 Filed 03/16/26 Page 5 of 11\n\n\n\n\n 1 the expenses for which reimbursement is sought. The reimbursement to Nominees shall not\n\n 2 exceed $0.02 per name, address, and email address provided to the Notice Administrator; $0.02\n\n 3 per link to the Long Notice actually emailed by Nominees; or $0.02 plus postage at the current\n\n 4 pre-sort rate used by the Notice Administrator per Postcard Notice mailed directly to beneficial\n\n 5 owners by Nominees.\n\n 6 8. Contemporaneously with the mailing of the Postcard Notice, the Notice\n\n 7 Administrator shall cause a copy of the Notices, substantially in the form attached as Exhibits 1-\n\n 8 3, to be posted on the Notice Administrator\u2019s website, www.JaegervZillowLitigation.com. Ex. 5\n\n 9 at \u00b6\u00b6 5,8. Class Members will be able download copies of the Notices. Id. at \u00b6 8. The case\n\n10 website will also provide an overview of the case and highlight important dates, such as the\n\n11 Exclusion Deadline. The Notice Administrator will also post on the case website the proposed\n\n12 Opt-Out Form.\n\n13 9. The Notice Administrator shall cause a copy of the Summary Notice, substantially\n\n14 in the form attached hereto as Exhibit 2, to be published once in Investor\u2019s Business Daily and\n\n15 issued once over Globe Newswire, each within ten (10) calendar days of the mailing of the\n\n16 Postcard Notice. Id. at \u00b6 5.\n\n17 10. The Notice Administrator will also maintain a toll-free telephone number and\n\n18 email address that will be staffed with customer service representatives trained to answer\n\n19 questions about the Action. Id. at \u00b6 8.\n\n20 11. Class Members shall be bound by all determinations and judgments in this\n\n21 Action, whether favorable or unfavorable, unless such persons and entities request exclusion\n\n22 from the Class in a timely and proper manner, as hereinafter provided. A Class Member wishing\n\n23 to be excluded from the Class shall mail a written request by first class mail, postmarked no later\n\n24 than 60 calendar days from the Notice Date, to the address designated in the Notice. Such request\n\n25 for exclusion shall clearly state that the Class Member requests exclusion from the Class in\n\n26 Jaeger v. Zillow Group Inc., et al., Case No.: 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ, and it must: (i) state the name,\n\n27 address, telephone number, and email address of the person or entity requesting exclusion; (ii)\n\n28 state the number of Zillow securities purchased, acquired, sold, and/or disposed during the Class\n STIPULATED MOTION & [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR\n APPROVAL OF CLASS NOTICE \u2013 4\n No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ\n 011060-11/2847587 V2\n\f Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 158 Filed 03/16/26 Page 6 of 11\n\n\n\n\n 1 Period, as well as the dates and prices of each such purchase, acquisition, sale, and/or\n\n 2 disposition; (iii) be signed by the person or entity requesting exclusion, or an authorized\n\n 3 representative thereof; and (iv) include account documentation reflecting the person or entity\u2019s\n\n 4 purchase and sale of Zillow securities during the Class Period. The request for exclusion shall\n\n 5 not be effective unless it provides the required information and is made within the time stated\n\n 6 above, or the exclusion is otherwise accepted by the Court.\n\n 7 12. Any Class Member who retains separate counsel in connection with this matter\n\n 8 must enter an appearance, as set out in the Long Notice, no later than seventy-five (75) calendar\n\n 9 days after the Notice Date. Within eighty (80) calendar days after the Notice Date, Class Counsel\n\n10 will forward to counsel for Defendants any notices of appearance that were mailed to Class\n\n11 Counsel but not filed with the Court.\n\n12 13. Class Counsel shall file with the Court proof of mailing of the Postcard Notice,\n\n13 proof of publication of the Summary Notice, and proof of posting of the Notice on the Notice\n\n14 Administrator\u2019s website within ten (10) calendar days following the Summary Notice publication\n\n15 date. Class Counsel shall also file with the Court an affidavit setting forth a list of all persons and\n\n16 entities who have validly and timely requested exclusion from the Class within fourteen (14)\n\n17 calendar days following the expiration of the exclusion deadline.\n\n18 14. At minimum, the Notice Administrator will perform the following tasks to\n\n19 complete adequate notice to Class Members: (1) set up a case website which will host copies of\n\n20 the Long Notice, Summary Notice, Postcard Notice, Opt-Out Form, operative Complaint,\n\n21 relevant Court orders, and all other pertinent information for Class Members; (2) assist in\n\n22 preparing the Long Notice, Summary Notice, Postcard Notice, Opt-Out Form, and the email link\n\n23 to the electronic Long Notice; (3) notify Nominees of the appropriate manner to provide the\n\n24 Notices to potential Class Members who are beneficial holders; (4) set-up a database for Class\n\n25 Members\u2019 information, a phone system, and a frequently asked questions protocol for use by the\n\n26 Notice Administrator\u2019s customer service representatives; (5) perform email verification for all\n\n27 emails received and perform National Change of Address search for pre-mailings of the Postcard\n\n28 Notice; (6) disseminate, by email, where possible, or by mailed Postcard Notice, notice to Class\n STIPULATED MOTION & [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR\n APPROVAL OF CLASS NOTICE \u2013 5\n No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ\n 011060-11/2847587 V2\n\f Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 158 Filed 03/16/26 Page 7 of 11\n\n\n\n\n 1 Members who can be identified with reasonable effort; (7) publish the Summary Notice once\n\n 2 over the Globe Newswire and once in the Investors\u2019 Business Daily; (8) perform skip-tracing for\n\n 3 Postcard Notices returned to SCS as undeliverable; (9) update the Class information database to\n\n 4 include updated contact information and other updated information regarding Class Members;\n\n 5 (10) handle and respond to all phone call questions from Class Members; (11) respond to all\n\n 6 other questions via e-mails, letters, and other correspondence from Class Members; (12)\n\n 7 correspond with brokers and institutions to answer any questions and assist with any information\n\n 8 concerning administrative matters regarding the Action; (13) review and process all opt-out\n\n 9 requests; (14) prepare declarations as required by the Court throughout the administration\n\n10 process; and (15) perform all other actions as directed by Lead Plaintiff\u2019s counsel or the Court.\n\n11 Ex. 5 at \u00b6 9.\n\n12 15. Below is a table of the material notice dates described above.\n\n13 Event Date\n14 Order granting stipulation for class notice Order Date\n and summary notice (\u201cOrder Date\u201d)\n15 Zillow or its transfer agent provides 21 days after Order Date\n16 security holder records identifying all\n persons or entities who purchased Zillow\n17 securities during the Class Period to the\n Notice Administrator\n18\n Notice Administrator distributes Notices 30 days after Order Date\n19 and publishes case website (\u201cNotice\n Date\u201d)\n20 Notice Administrator facilitates 10 days after Notice Date\n21 publication of the Summary Notice in\n Investor\u2019s Business Daily and in Globe\n22 Newswire (\u201cNotice Publication Date\u201d)\n Exclusion Deadline 60 days after Notice Date\n23\n Appearance Deadline for attorneys acting 75 days after Notice Date\n24 as separate counsel on behalf of any Class\n Members\n25\n Class counsel files proof of dissemination 10 days after Notice Publication Date\n26 of Notices\n27\n\n28\n STIPULATED MOTION & [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR\n APPROVAL OF CLASS NOTICE \u2013 6\n No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ\n 011060-11/2847587 V2\n\f Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 158 Filed 03/16/26 Page 8 of 11\n\n\n\n\n 1 Class counsel files affidavit identifying all 14 days after Exclusion Deadline\n persons and/or entities who have\n 2\n requested exclusion\n 3\n\n 4 IT IS SO STIPULATED.\n\n 5 DATED: March 16, 2026\n\n 6\n By: /s/ Steve W. Berman By: /s/ Peter B. Morrison\n 7 Steve W. Berman, WSBA No. 12536 Peter B. Morrison (admitted pro hac vice)\n By: /s/ Catherine Y. N. Gannon Virginia F. Milstead (admitted pro hac vice)\n 8 Catherine Y. N. Gannon, WSBA No. 47664 Winston Hsiao (admitted pro hac vice)\n By: /s/ Sean R. Matt SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER\n 9 & FLOM, LLP\n Sean R. Matt, WSBA No. 21972 300 South Grand Avenue, Suite 3400\n10 HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP Los Angeles, CA 90071\n 1301 Second Avenue, Suite 2000 Telephone: (213) 687-5000\n11 Seattle, WA 98101 Facsimile: (213) 521-5000\n Telephone: (206) 623-7292 Peter.Morrison@skadden.com\n12 Facsimile: (206) 623-0594 Virginia.Milstead@skadden.com\n steve@hbsslaw.com Winston.Hsiao@skadden.com\n13\n catherineg@hbsslaw.com\n14 sean@hbsslaw.com By: /s/ Sean C. Knowles\n Sean C. Knowles, WSBA No. 39893\n15 Lucas E. Gilmore (admitted pro hac vice) PERKINS COIE LLP\n HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900\n16 715 Hearst Avenue, Suite 202 Seattle, WA 98101\n Berkeley, CA 94710 Telephone: (206) 359-8000\n17 Telephone: (510) 725-3000 Facsimile: (206) 359-9000\n18 Facsimile: (510) 725-3001 SKnowles@perkinscoie.com\n lucasg@hbsslaw.com\n19 Attorneys for Defendants\n Raffi Melanson (admitted pro hac vice) Zillow Group, Inc., Richard Barton,\n20 HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP Allen Parker, and Jeremy Wacksman\n 1 Faneuil Hall Sq., 5th Floor\n21 Boston, MA 02109\n22 Telephone: (617) 482-3700\n Facsimile: (617) 482-3003\n23\n Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiff Jaeger\n24\n Stacey M. Kaplan (admitted pro hac vice)\n25 KESSLER TOPAZ MELTZER\n & CHECK, LLP\n26\n One Sansome Street, Suite 1850\n27 San Francisco, CA 94104\n Telephone: (415) 400-3000\n28 Facsimile: (415) 400-3001\n STIPULATED MOTION & [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR\n APPROVAL OF CLASS NOTICE \u2013 7\n No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ\n 011060-11/2847587 V2\n\f Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 158 Filed 03/16/26 Page 9 of 11\n\n\n\n\n 1 skaplan@ktmc.com\n\n 2 Gregory M. Castaldo (admitted pro hac vice)\n Evan R. Hoey (admitted pro hac vice)\n 3 KESSLER TOPAZ MELTZER\n & CHECK, LLP\n 4\n 280 King of Prussia Road\n 5 Radnor, PA 19087\n Telephone: (610) 667-7706\n 6 Facsimile: (610) 667-7056\n gcastaldo@ktmc.com\n 7 ehoey@ktmc.com\n\n 8 Additional Counsel for Lead Plaintiff Jaeger\n 9\n\n10\n\n11\n\n12\n\n13\n\n14\n\n15\n\n16\n\n17\n\n18\n\n19\n\n20\n\n21\n\n22\n\n23\n\n24\n\n25\n\n26\n\n27\n\n28\n STIPULATED MOTION & [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR\n APPROVAL OF CLASS NOTICE \u2013 8\n No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ\n 011060-11/2847587 V2\n\f Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 158 Filed 03/16/26 Page 10 of 11\n\n\n\n\n 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER\n\n 2\n\n 3 IT IS SO ORDERED.\n\n 4\n DATED:\n 5 THOMAS S. ZILLY\n United States District Judge\n 6\n\n 7\n\n 8\n\n 9\n\n10\n\n11\n\n12\n\n13\n\n14\n\n15\n\n16\n\n17\n\n18\n\n19\n\n20\n\n21\n\n22\n\n23\n\n24\n\n25\n\n26\n\n27\n\n28\n STIPULATED MOTION & [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR\n APPROVAL OF CLASS NOTICE \u2013 9\n No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ\n 011060-11/2847587 V2\n\f Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 158 Filed 03/16/26 Page 11 of 11\n\n\n\n\n 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE\n\n 2 I hereby certify that on March 16, 2026, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was\n 3 filed electronically by CM/ECF, which caused notice to be sent to all counsel of record.\n\n 4\n /s/ Steve W. Berman\n 5 Steve W. Berman\n\n 6\n\n 7\n\n 8\n\n 9\n\n10\n\n11\n\n12\n\n13\n\n14\n\n15\n\n16\n\n17\n\n18\n\n19\n\n20\n\n21\n\n22\n\n23\n\n24\n\n25\n\n26\n\n27\n\n28\n STIPULATED MOTION & [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR\n APPROVAL OF CLASS NOTICE \u2013 10\n No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ\n 011060-11/2847587 V2\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2026-04-16T11:35:00.748349-07:00","document_number":"158","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"197012310585","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Stipulated Motion","acms_document_guid":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/476087969/","id":476087969,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/61471283/158/1/jaeger-v-zillow-group-inc/","date_created":"2026-04-16T11:35:02.139501-07:00","date_modified":"2026-04-16T11:35:39.045842-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":7,"file_size":406263,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"158","attachment_number":1,"pacer_doc_id":"197012310586","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":2,"description":"Exhibit 1 - Long Form Notice","acms_document_guid":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/476087970/","id":476087970,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/61471283/158/2/jaeger-v-zillow-group-inc/","date_created":"2026-04-16T11:35:02.367790-07:00","date_modified":"2026-04-16T11:35:39.058496-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":3,"file_size":378996,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"158","attachment_number":2,"pacer_doc_id":"197012310587","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":2,"description":"Exhibit 2 - Summary Notice","acms_document_guid":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/476087971/","id":476087971,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/61471283/158/3/jaeger-v-zillow-group-inc/","date_created":"2026-04-16T11:35:02.401061-07:00","date_modified":"2026-04-16T11:35:39.067865-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":5,"file_size":860664,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"158","attachment_number":3,"pacer_doc_id":"197012310588","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":2,"description":"Exhibit 3 - Postcard Notice","acms_document_guid":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/476087972/","id":476087972,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/61471283/158/4/jaeger-v-zillow-group-inc/","date_created":"2026-04-16T11:35:02.781313-07:00","date_modified":"2026-04-16T11:35:39.079949-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":3,"file_size":295759,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"158","attachment_number":4,"pacer_doc_id":"197012310589","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":2,"description":"Exhibit 4 - Request for Exclusion Form","acms_document_guid":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/476087973/","id":476087973,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/61471283/158/5/jaeger-v-zillow-group-inc/","date_created":"2026-04-16T11:35:02.923603-07:00","date_modified":"2026-04-16T11:35:39.105704-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":21,"file_size":3105523,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"158","attachment_number":5,"pacer_doc_id":"197012310590","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":2,"description":"Exhibit 5 - Declaration of Paul Mulholland","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-03-16T18:20:23.089986-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-06T06:12:14.863711-07:00","date_filed":"2026-03-16","time_filed":"17:52:49","entry_number":158,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-03-16.001","pacer_sequence_number":532,"description":"Stipulated MOTION and [Proposed] Order for Approval of Class Notice, filed by Plaintiff Jeremy Jaeger. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Long Form Notice, # 2 Exhibit 2 - Summary Notice, # 3 Exhibit 3 - Postcard Notice, # 4 Exhibit 4 - Request for Exclusion Form, # 5 Exhibit 5 - Declaration of Paul Mulholland) Noting Date 3/16/2026, (Berman, Steve) (Entered: 03/16/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/454418341/","id":454418341,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/469335233/","id":469335233,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/61471283/157/jaeger-v-zillow-group-inc/","date_created":"2026-02-19T13:25:48.399351-08:00","date_modified":"2026-07-06T06:12:14.782131-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"157","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"197012259975","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Minute Order","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-02-19T13:25:48.372727-08:00","date_modified":"2026-07-06T06:12:14.725084-07:00","date_filed":"2026-02-19","time_filed":"13:10:01","entry_number":157,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-02-19.001","pacer_sequence_number":525,"description":"MINUTE ORDER made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge:(1) The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Status Report, docket no. 156 . Defendants' request is therefore DENIED. The stay previously imposed in this case is hereby LIFTED, and this case is returned to the Courts active docket.(2) The parties are DIRECTED to meet and confer and to file, no later than 3/16/2026, a joint status report containing their proposed plan for providing notice to the Class, along with a draft form of notice. If the parties cannot agree on such plan and/or notice, then they shall state their respective views in the joint status report.(3) The Court sets the following case schedule: Jury Trial is set for 4/26/2027, Completion of Document Production due by 5/1/2026, Fact Discovery Motions Cut-off 7/9/2026, Oppositions to any Fact Discovery Motions due by 7/23/2026, Replies to any Fact Discovery Motions due by 8/6/2026, Completion of Fact Discovery due by 8/20/2026, Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 9/25/2026, Rebuttal Expert Disclosure/Reports due by 10/23/2026, Exchange of Reply Reports due by 11/6/2026, Completion of Expert Discovery completed by 11/20/2026, Dispositive Motions and Daubert Motions due by 12/11/2026, Oppositions to any Dispositive or Daubert Motions due by 1/8/2027, Replies to any Dispositive or Daubert Motions due by 1/22/2027, Motions in Limine due by 2/12/2027, Agreed Pretrial Order due by 2/26/2027, Voir dire/jury instructions/trial briefs due by 2/26/2027, Pretrial Conference set for 4/9/2027 at 10:00 AM. (CJS) (Entered: 02/19/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/451944016/","id":451944016,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/466800450/","id":466800450,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/61471283/156/jaeger-v-zillow-group-inc/","date_created":"2026-01-28T19:25:29.116975-08:00","date_modified":"2026-07-06T06:12:14.666130-07:00","sha1":"6c1f3829bc2e81792e3a71a14e85da0a50ffb42f","page_count":9,"file_size":76985,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.wawd.305262/gov.uscourts.wawd.305262.156.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.wawd.305262/gov.uscourts.wawd.305262.156.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":" Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 156 Filed 01/28/26 Page 1 of 9\n\n\n\n\n 1 The Honorable Thomas S. Zilly\n\n 2\n\n 3\n\n 4\n\n 5\n\n 6\n\n 7\n\n 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON\n 9 AT SEATTLE\n10\n\n11 JEREMY JAEGER, individually and on No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ\n behalf of all others similarly situated,\n12 JOINT STATUS REPORT\n Plaintiff,\n13\n v.\n14\n\n15 ZILLOW GROUP, INC., et al.,\n\n16 Defendants.\n\n17\n Pursuant to the Court\u2019s October 17, 2025, Minute Order (Dkt. 153), Lead Plaintiff Jeremy\n18\n Jaeger, together with Defendants Zillow Group, Inc., Richard Barton, Allen Parker, and Jeremy\n19\n Wacksman (the \u201cParties\u201d), respectfully submit this Joint Status Report:\n20\n On August 23, 2024, the Court granted Plaintiff\u2019s Motion for Class Certification. Dkt. 137.\n21\n On October 24, 2024, the Ninth Circuit granted Defendants\u2019 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f)\n22\n petition seeking permission to appeal the Court\u2019s class certification order (the \u201cAppeal\u201d). Dkt. 147.\n23\n On November 1, 2024, this Court sua sponte entered a stay of this action pending resolution of the\n24\n Appeal (the \u201cStay Order\u201d). Dkt. 149.\n25\n On September 26, 2025, the Ninth Circuit issued a decision affirming this Court\u2019s class\n26\n certification order, and on January 6, 2026, it denied Defendants\u2019 petition for a panel rehearing\n27\n\n28\n\n JOINT STATUS REPORT (No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ) \u2013 1\n 1301 Second Avenue, Suite 2000, Seattle, WA 98101\n (206) 623-7292 OFFICE (206) 623-0594 FAX\n\f Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 156 Filed 01/28/26 Page 2 of 9\n\n\n\n\n 1 and their petition for rehearing en banc. These orders resolved Defendants\u2019 Appeal, and therefore\n\n 2 the case mandate was issued from the Ninth Circuit back to this Court on January 14, 2026.\n\n 3 A. Stay Order\n\n 4 The Parties met and conferred on January 21, 2026, and disagree as to the appropriateness\n\n 5 of lifting the stay at this time.\n\n 6 Plaintiff\u2019s Position: This case has been pending since 2021, and class notice and discovery\n\n 7 have been frozen since October 2024. Continuing the stay would prolong this litigation indefinitely\n\n 8 without any showing that further delay is justified. The stay was entered solely because the Ninth\n\n 9 Circuit granted Defendants\u2019 Rule 23(f) petition. Dkt. 149. That appeal has now concluded. With\n\n10 the basis for the stay gone, the case should move forward.\n\n11 And yet, Defendants now seek to prolong the stay while they pursue a petition for certiorari.\n\n12 But a stay pending certiorari is an extraordinary remedy, not a procedural entitlement. It is also\n\n13 \u201cnot a matter of right,\u201d and here Defendants bear the burden of showing that the circumstances\n\n14 justify such relief. Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 433\u201334 (2009). The most critical factors are a\n\n15 strong showing of likely success and irreparable harm. Id. at 434. Defendants satisfy neither factor.\n\n16 First, Defendants cannot plausibly claim a meaningful likelihood of Supreme Court review.\n\n17 The Ninth Circuit\u2019s decision was unanimous, unpublished, fact-bound, and reviewed under the\n\n18 deferential abuse-of-discretion standard. Defendants then failed to obtain a rehearing, and no judge\n\n19 voted for en banc review. As Judge Pechman recently explained in a case where a defendant had\n\n20 also failed to secure an appellate panel rehearing or en banc review: \u201cthere is little likelihood that\n\n21 the petition for certiorari will be granted,\u201d and that the absence of any en banc votes is \u201ca strong\n\n22 indication that the petition is unlikely to be taken up.\u201d Ngethpharat v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins.\n\n23 Co., 2025 WL 672730, at *1\u20132 (W.D. Wash. Mar. 3, 2025). This case presents an even weaker\n\n24 basis for certiorari, as it falls squarely within the ordinary run of Rule 23(f) securities litigation\n\n25 appeals that have a less than one percent chance of reaching the Supreme Court.\n\n26 Defendants also fail as to the second factor as they identify below no irreparable injury\n\n27 beyond the ordinary burdens of litigation. That is legally insufficient. Nken, 556 U.S. at 435;\n\n28 Ngethpharat, 2025 WL 672730, at *2 (holding that being required to litigate does not constitute\n\n JOINT STATUS REPORT (No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ) \u2013 2\n 1301 Second Avenue, Suite 2000, Seattle, WA 98101\n (206) 623-7292 OFFICE (206) 623-0594 FAX\n\f Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 156 Filed 01/28/26 Page 3 of 9\n\n\n\n\n 1 hardship). By contrast, continued delay inflicts concrete and asymmetric harm on Plaintiffs and\n\n 2 the class. As Ngethpharat emphasized, \u201cfurther delay \u2026 does not serve the interest of justice and\n\n 3 will inject yet more delay in this aging matter.\u201d Id.\n\n 4 Finally, Defendants\u2019 conduct further undermines their request. Had they believed a stay\n\n 5 was warranted, they should have sought a stay of the mandate in the Ninth Circuit as it is \u201cfar\n\n 6 better positioned\u201d than the district court to determine whether a stay pending certiorari is\n\n 7 appropriate. Ngethpharat, 2025 WL 672730, at *1. But Defendants chose not to do so here.\n\n 8 Plaintiffs should not bear the consequences of that strategic choice.\n\n 9 On balance, the equities decisively favor lifting the stay. If certiorari is denied\u2014as is\n\n10 overwhelmingly likely\u2014the lost time cannot be recovered. If certiorari is granted\u2014an\n\n11 extraordinary event\u2014this Court retains full authority to address any resulting consequences.\n\n12 Continued suspension of proceedings on this record would serve neither judicial economy nor\n\n13 fairness.\n\n14 Defendants\u2019 Position: Defendants believe that the stay should be extended through the\n\n15 resolution of Defendants\u2019 anticipated petition for writ of certiorari in the Supreme Court. The\n\n16 Appeal raises significant issues that affect securities litigation nationwide, and, notwithstanding\n\n17 Plaintiff's characterization of the currently anticipated certiorari petition as \"weak[],\" the Court\n\n18 need not pre-judge the merits of any petition in order to decide whether to extend the stay in this\n\n19 case. Nor, contrary to Plaintiff\u2019s suggestion, do Defendants need to meet what amounts to a\n\n20 preliminary injunction standard. District courts in the Ninth Circuit stay proceedings pending\n\n21 certiorari petitions because \"a ruling on [a certiorari] petition has the potential to clarify and\n\n22 streamline the issues in this case with minimal hardship.\" Puget Soundkeeper All. v. Port of\n\n23 Tacoma, 2024 WL 4799761, at *1-2 (W.D. Wash. Nov. 15, 2024) (staying action where\n\n24 \"[a]waiting a determination on the petition will clarify the issues and questions of law for this\n\n25 litigation\" and plaintiff \"will not have to wait long to see whether its prediction that Defendants'\n\n26 petition is 'futile' comes true\"); Bank of New York Mellon v. Blackrose Invs., LLC, 2017 WL\n\n27 11883465, at *1-2 (D. Nev. Apr. 12, 2017) (staying action to \"permit the parties to present\n\n28 arguments and evidence in the context of complete and resolved precedent, and . . . allow [the\n\n JOINT STATUS REPORT (No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ) \u2013 3\n 1301 Second Avenue, Suite 2000, Seattle, WA 98101\n (206) 623-7292 OFFICE (206) 623-0594 FAX\n\f Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 156 Filed 01/28/26 Page 4 of 9\n\n\n\n\n 1 court] to evaluate the claims in light of this legal authority\"; finding \"[a]ny possible damage that a\n\n 2 stay may cause is minimal\" where the \"stay will be reasonably brief and is not indefinite\").\n\n 3 Here, the Supreme Court's consideration of the issues to be raised in Defendants' currently\n\n 4 anticipated certiorari petition has \"the potential to be dispositive of this case or at least of discrete\n\n 5 issues that it presents.\" Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co. v. Copper Sands HOA, 2017 WL 773863, at\n\n 6 *2 (D. Nev. Feb. 28, 2017). Thus, extending the stay will prevent \"unnecessary briefing and the\n\n 7 expenditures of time, attorney's fees, and resources that could be wasted\u2014or at least prematurely\n\n 8 spent\u2014should the Supreme Court take up [the case].\" Id. Further, any potential hardship or further\n\n 9 delay would be minimal. Murguia v. Langdon, No. 2023 WL 6308325, at *3 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 28,\n\n10 2023) (\"After the nearly two-year delay between the district court's order and the issuance of the\n\n11 Ninth Circuit's mandate, a brief delay pending resolution of the petition for certiorari will not make\n\n12 a greater difference in witness\u2019 memories or the loss of evidence.\"); Puget, 2024 WL 4799761, at\n\n13 *1 (finding potential damage from stay pending certiorari petition \"minimal and manageable\").\n\n14 Consequently, the most efficient course for both the Court and the Parties is to maintain the status\n\n15 quo, as the Court already recognized when it ordered the stay to remain in effect through the\n\n16 resolution of Defendants' en banc petition. (Dkt. 153.)\n\n17 B. Class Notice Plan\n\n18 As for the class notice plan, at the time of the Stay Order, the Parties were days away from\n\n19 filing a proposed notice dissemination plan, long form class notice, summary class notice, postcard\n\n20 notice, class member opt-out form, and a declaration from the class notice administrator for the\n\n21 Court\u2019s review. Dkt. 146 at 2-3. Plaintiffs believe that class notice should proceed now that\n\n22 Defendants\u2019 Appeal has been resolved and that the class notice materials have already been\n\n23 prepared. Dkt. 149. Defendants believe that continuing with the preparation of a proposed class\n\n24 notice plan is premature until the currently anticipated certiorari petition is resolved.\n\n25 C. Status of Discovery Prior to Stay\n\n26 Prior to the November 2024 Stay Order, the Parties were working cooperatively on\n\n27 completing discovery. Defendants substantially completed document production on January 29,\n\n28 2024, having produced over 240,000 documents. This was followed by additional rolling\n\n JOINT STATUS REPORT (No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ) \u2013 4\n 1301 Second Avenue, Suite 2000, Seattle, WA 98101\n (206) 623-7292 OFFICE (206) 623-0594 FAX\n\f Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 156 Filed 01/28/26 Page 5 of 9\n\n\n\n\n 1 productions to address various discovery issues raised by Plaintiff. Depositions commenced in\n\n 2 July and August 2024 but were temporarily paused in September and October to allow the Parties\n\n 3 to complete a targeted supplemental production for the reasons described in the September 26,\n\n 4 2024, Stipulated Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. Dkt. 144. The Parties were planning to\n\n 5 restart depositions in November 2024, but these were cancelled due to the Stay Order.\n\n 6 Additionally, Zillow made a series of productions in November and December 2025 for\n\n 7 the reasons described in the October 2025 Joint Status Report. Dkt. 152. The Parties also expect\n\n 8 additional productions will be made over the next few months relating to the discovery issues\n\n 9 described below.\n\n10 D. Status of Discovery Disputes\n\n11 At the time of the Stay Order, the Parties were negotiating responsiveness, burden, and\n\n12 scope related to five discovery issues: (1) outstanding Slack communications; (2) interim drafts\n\n13 from cloud-based documents; (3) outstanding video requests; (4) Zillow board of directors\n\n14 communications; and (5) privilege log entries. The Parties have worked cooperatively on all five\n\n15 issues and are close to resolving issues 1-3. The Parties will continue to meet and confer over\n\n16 issues related to (4) board of directors communications and (5) privilege log entries regardless of\n\n17 this Court\u2019s decision regarding the requested stay.\n\n18 E. Anticipated Future Discovery\n\n19 The Parties will continue to meet and confer over the next several weeks and agree to seek\n\n20 judicial resolution of any discovery disputes if the Parties remain at an impasse by the end of\n\n21 March. If a stay is not granted, the Parties expect to substantially complete this tranche of discovery\n\n22 by May 2026 and will proceed with taking approximately 10-15 fact depositions during the\n\n23 summer.\n\n24 F. Mediation Developments\n\n25 The Parties completed a mediation with Robert Meyer of JAMS on August 22, 2025. No\n\n26 agreement was reached.\n\n27\n\n28\n\n JOINT STATUS REPORT (No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ) \u2013 5\n 1301 Second Avenue, Suite 2000, Seattle, WA 98101\n (206) 623-7292 OFFICE (206) 623-0594 FAX\n\f Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 156 Filed 01/28/26 Page 6 of 9\n\n\n\n\n 1 G. Proposed Schedule\n\n 2 In the event the Court declines to extend the stay, the Parties propose the below case\n\n 3 schedule, with Plaintiff\u2019s and Defendants\u2019 respective proposed deadlines in separate columns.\n\n 4 Plaintiff\u2019s Position: Defendants elected to pursue an interlocutory appeal that predictably\n\n 5 halted progress in this case for more than fifteen months. While Defendants were entitled to seek\n\n 6 appellate review, equity does not require that Plaintiffs absorb the full cost of that delay while\n\n 7 Defendants emerge with the benefit of both the appellate pause and the original pre-appeal\n\n 8 scheduling intervals. An accelerated schedule regarding future deadlines is therefore the most\n\n 9 equitable way to account for the substantial appellate delay while preserving Defendants\u2019 full\n\n10 opportunity to litigate on the merits. In short, the case should move forward with urgency\n\n11 proportionate to the time already lost.\n\n12 Defendant\u2019s Position: Defendants believe more time for discovery is warranted in order to\n\n13 give the Parties sufficient time to schedule all necessary depositions, taking into account\n\n14 scheduling challenges when there are multiple witnesses, including witnesses located in different\n\n15 parts of the country, necessitating travel.\n\n16 Defendants' proposed schedule otherwise is largely consistent with the schedule that was\n\n17 in place before the Court sua sponte issued the Stay Order. (See Dkt. 145.) Whereas that schedule\n\n18 contemplated 326 days between the cut-off for fact discovery motions and the pretrial conference,\n\n19 Defendants' proposed schedule below contemplates 329 days. By contrast, Plaintiff's proposed\n\n20 schedule truncates that time to only 196 days, imposing unrealistic timelines for the Parties and\n\n21 making it likely the Parties will have to come back to the Court to ask for more time.\n\n22 While the time between events in Defendants' proposed schedule largely tracks that of the\n\n23 Parties' most recent stipulated and approved scheduling order, in order to avoid potential\n\n24 scheduling conflicts from compressed timetables, Defendants propose to adjust the time between\n\n25 certain events as follows:\n\n26 \u2022 Add 13 days between the cut-off for fact discovery motions and the completion of\n\n27 fact discovery, for a total of 49 days (7 weeks), to allow a briefing schedule of 4 weeks for any\n\n28 oppositions and 3 weeks for any replies;\n\n JOINT STATUS REPORT (No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ) \u2013 6\n 1301 Second Avenue, Suite 2000, Seattle, WA 98101\n (206) 623-7292 OFFICE (206) 623-0594 FAX\n\f Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 156 Filed 01/28/26 Page 7 of 9\n\n\n\n\n 1 \u2022 Add 19 days between the completion of fact discovery and expert witness reports,\n\n 2 for a total of 29 days, to account for multiple expert reports from the Parties;\n\n 3 \u2022 Add 1 week between the exchange of expert witness reply reports and the\n\n 4 completion of expert discovery, for a total of 3 weeks, to account for the need to schedule multiple\n\n 5 expert depositions;\n\n 6 \u2022 Add 2 weeks between the completion of expert discovery and the deadline to file\n\n 7 dispositive and Daubert motions, for a total of 4 weeks, to allow sufficient time after the close of\n\n 8 discovery, including expert discovery, to prepare dispositive and Daubert motions.\n\n 9 Plaintiff\u2019s proposed schedule would give the Court limited time to rule on any dispositive\n\n10 motions prior to the start of trial. Plaintiff\u2019s proposed condensed timeline leaves just 4 weeks\n\n11 between the completion of dispositive motion briefing and the Parties\u2019 deadline to submit the\n\n12 pretrial order, motions in limine, trial briefing, voir dire, and jury instructions. Whereas,\n\n13 Defendants\u2019 proposed schedule allows over 4 weeks between the completion of dispositive\n\n14 briefing and motions in limine, and then an additional 4 weeks before the deadline to submit the\n\n15 pretrial order, trial briefing, voir dire, and jury instructions. Not only does this timeline offer the\n\n16 Court more time to decide any dispositive motion before trial, but it also prevents the Parties from\n\n17 expending time and resources preparing for a trial that may not be necessary.\n\n18 Further, for reasons that are not clear, Plaintiff has proposed to shrink the time between\n\n19 certain events, in a manner that Defendants do not believe is practical or feasible. For example,\n\n20 Plaintiff proposes:\n\n21 \u2022 0 days between the completion of fact discovery and expert witness reports,\n\n22 rendering it infeasible for expert reports to capture all that is produced in discovery up to the\n\n23 deadline, meaning expert reports may be incomplete;\n\n24 \u2022 1 week between the exchange of expert witness rebuttal reports and the exchange\n\n25 of expert witness reply reports, when there will be multiple experts from the Parties;\n\n26 \u2022 2 weeks between the exchange of expert witness reply reports and the completion\n\n27 of expert discovery, when there will be multiple experts from the Parties who will likely need to\n\n28 be deposed in different parts of the country;\n\n JOINT STATUS REPORT (No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ) \u2013 7\n 1301 Second Avenue, Suite 2000, Seattle, WA 98101\n (206) 623-7292 OFFICE (206) 623-0594 FAX\n\f Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 156 Filed 01/28/26 Page 8 of 9\n\n\n\n\n 1 In addition, Plaintiff proposes that document production be completed by March 1, 2026,\n\n 2 which Defendants find unrealistic given that, as noted, the Parties expect additional productions\n\n 3 will be made over the next few months and potentially through May 2026, and are continuing to\n\n 4 meet and confer over disputed issues.\n\n 5 If the Court declines to extend the stay, Defendants respectfully request a status conference\n\n 6 to discuss the proposed schedule.\n\n 7 Event Plaintiff\u2019s Proposal Defendants\u2019 Proposal\n 8 Completion of Document Production March 1, 2026 May 1, 2026\n Fact Discovery Motions Cut-off July 3, 2026 September 3, 2026\n 9\n Oppositions to any Fact Discovery Motions July 17, 2026 October 1, 2026\n10 Replies to any Fact Discovery Motions July 24, 2026 October 22, 2026\n11 Completion of Fact Discovery August 21, 2026 October 22, 2026\n\n12 Expert Witness Reports August 21, 2026 November 20, 2026\n Exchange of Rebuttal Reports September 11, 2026 January 8, 2027\n13\n Exchange of Reply Reports September 18, 2026 February 5, 2027\n14 Completion of Expert Discovery September 25, 2026 February 26, 2027\n15 Deadline to File Dispositive Motions and October 2, 2026 March 26, 2027\n Daubert Motions\n16 Oppositions to any Dispositive or Daubert October 30, 2026 April 23, 2027\n17 Motions\n Replies to any Dispositive or Daubert November 20, 2026 May 14, 2027\n18 Motions\n19 Motions in Limine December 18, 2026 June 4, 2027\n Pretrial Order Due December 18, 2026 July 2, 2027\n20\n Trial Briefs, Voir Dire, Jury Instructions December 18, 2026 July 2, 2027\n21 Pretrial Conference January 15, 2027 July 29, 2027\n22 Jury Trial Date Start February 1, 2027 August 16, 2027\n23\n\n24\n\n25\n\n26\n\n27\n\n28\n\n JOINT STATUS REPORT (No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ) \u2013 8\n 1301 Second Avenue, Suite 2000, Seattle, WA 98101\n (206) 623-7292 OFFICE (206) 623-0594 FAX\n\f Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 156 Filed 01/28/26 Page 9 of 9\n\n\n\n\n 1 DATED: January 28, 2026\n 2 By: /s/ Steve W. Berman By: /s/ Peter B. Morrison\n 3 Steve W. Berman (WSBA No. 12536) Peter B. Morrison (pro hac vice)\n Catherine Y. N. Gannon (WSBA No. 47664) Virginia F. Milstead (pro hac vice)\n 4 Sean R. Matt (WSBA No. 21972) Winston Hsiao (pro hac vice)\n HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER &\n 5 1301 Second Avenue, Suite 2000 FLOM, LLP\n Seattle, WA 98101 2000 Avenue of the Stars\n 6\n Telephone: (206) 623-7292 Los Angeles, CA 90067\n 7 steve@hbsslaw.com Telephone: (213) 687-5000\n catherineg@hbsslaw.com peter.morrison@skadden.com\n 8 sean@hbsslaw.com virginia.milstead@skadden.com\n winston.hsiao@skadden.com\n 9 Lucas E. Gilmore (pro hac vice)\n HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP By: /s/ Sean C. Knowles\n10\n 715 Hearst Avenue, Suite 300 Sean C. Knowles, WSBA No. 39893\n11 Berkeley, CA 94710 PERKINS COIE LLP\n Telephone: (510) 725-3000 1301 Second Avenue, Suite 4200\n12 lucasg@hbsslaw.com Seattle, WA 98101-3804\n Telephone: (206) 359-8000\n13 Raffi Melanson (pro hac vice) sknowles@perkinscoie.com\n HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP\n14\n 1 Faneuil Hall Sq., 5th Floor Attorneys for Defendants\n15 Boston, MA 02109 Zillow Group, Inc., Richard Barton,\n Telephone: (617) 482-3700 Allen Parker, and Jeremy Wacksman\n16 raffim@hbsslaw.com\n17 Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiff Jaeger\n18\n Stacey M. Kaplan (pro hac vice)\n19 KESSLER TOPAZ MELTZER & CHECK, LLP\n One Sansome Street, Suite 1850\n20 San Francisco, CA 94104\n Telephone: (415) 400-3000\n21 skaplan@ktmc.com\n22\n Gregory M. Castaldo (pro hac vice)\n23 Evan R. Hoey (pro hac vice)\n KESSLER TOPAZ MELTZER & CHECK, LLP\n24 280 King of Prussia Road\n Radnor, PA 19087\n25 Telephone: (610) 667-7706\n26 gcastaldo@ktmc.com\n ehoey@ktmc.com\n27\n Additional Counsel for Lead Plaintiff Jaeger\n28\n\n JOINT STATUS REPORT (No. 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ) \u2013 9\n 1301 Second Avenue, Suite 2000, Seattle, WA 98101\n (206) 623-7292 OFFICE (206) 623-0594 FAX\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2026-04-16T11:36:10.305177-07:00","document_number":"156","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"197012217548","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Joint Status Report","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-01-28T19:25:29.092009-08:00","date_modified":"2026-07-06T06:12:14.622363-07:00","date_filed":"2026-01-28","time_filed":"18:34:47","entry_number":156,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-01-28.001","pacer_sequence_number":523,"description":"JOINT STATUS REPORT signed by all parties. (Berman, Steve) (Entered: 01/28/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/450308219/","id":450308219,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/465122622/","id":465122622,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/61471283/155/jaeger-v-zillow-group-inc/","date_created":"2026-01-14T11:22:53.310662-08:00","date_modified":"2026-07-06T06:12:14.555689-07:00","sha1":"d47ebc78ded46521b84fb3f8dfeb9813de2630c9","page_count":1,"file_size":190233,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.wawd.305262/gov.uscourts.wawd.305262.155.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.wawd.305262/gov.uscourts.wawd.305262.155.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":" Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 155 Filed 01/14/26 Page 1 of 1\n\n\n\n\n UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED\n FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAN 14 2026\n MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK\n U.S. COURT OF APPEALS\nJEREMY JAEGER, No. 24-6605\n D.C. No.\n Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ\n v. Western District of Washington,\n Seattle\nZILLOW GROUP, INC.; et al.,\n MANDATE\n Defendants - Appellants.\n\n\n\n The judgment of this Court, entered September 26, 2025, takes effect this\n\ndate.\n\n This constitutes the formal mandate of this Court issued pursuant to\n\nRule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.\n\n\n\n FOR THE COURT:\n\n MOLLY C. DWYER\n CLERK OF COURT\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2026-04-16T11:35:56.697326-07:00","document_number":"155","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"197012189307","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Mandate of USCA","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-01-14T11:22:53.279260-08:00","date_modified":"2026-07-06T06:12:14.503381-07:00","date_filed":"2026-01-14","time_filed":"10:42:03","entry_number":155,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-01-14.001","pacer_sequence_number":519,"description":"MANDATE OF USCA (24-6605) as to 147 Notice of Appeal, filed by Jeremy Wacksman, Richard Barton, Zillow Group Inc, Allen Parker, 151 Memorandum from USCA. The judgment of this Court, entered September 26, 2025, takes effect this date. This constitutes the formal mandate of this Court issued pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. AFFIRMED. (RE) (Entered: 01/14/2026)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/443643773/","id":443643773,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/458288131/","id":458288131,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/61471283/154/jaeger-v-zillow-group-inc/","date_created":"2025-11-10T09:23:24.899399-08:00","date_modified":"2026-07-06T06:12:14.438061-07:00","sha1":"afd2fc514f0c5205b4feec2cb5f2dc6293835e24","page_count":1,"file_size":210608,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.wawd.305262/gov.uscourts.wawd.305262.154.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.wawd.305262/gov.uscourts.wawd.305262.154.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":" Case 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ Document 154 Filed 11/07/25 Page 1 of 1\n\n\n\n\n UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED\n FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NOV 7 2025\n MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK\n U.S. COURT OF APPEALS\nJEREMY JAEGER, No. 24-6605\n D.C. No.\n Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:21-cv-01551-TSZ\n Western District of Washington,\n v. Seattle\nZILLOW GROUP, INC.; et al., ORDER\n\n Defendants - Appellants.\n\nBefore: GRABER, OWENS, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.\n\n Appellee is directed to file a response to the petition for panel rehearing or\n\nrehearing en banc filed on October 24, 2025. See Dkt. 50. The response shall not\n\nexceed 15 pages or 4,200 words, and shall be filed within 21 days of the date of this\n\norder.\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2026-06-29T02:55:32.375032-07:00","document_number":"154","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"197012079944","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order of USCA","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2025-11-10T09:23:24.732405-08:00","date_modified":"2026-07-06T06:12:14.379402-07:00","date_filed":"2025-11-07","time_filed":null,"entry_number":154,"recap_sequence_number":"2025-11-07.001","pacer_sequence_number":516,"description":"ORDER OF USCA (24-6605) as to 147 Notice of Appeal, filed by Jeremy Wacksman, Richard Barton, Zillow Group Inc, Allen Parker. (RE) (Entered: 11/10/2025)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/441306783/","id":441306783,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/61471283/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/455884508/","id":455884508,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/61471283/153/jaeger-v-zillow-group-inc/","date_created":"2025-10-17T16:07:30.856006-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-06T06:12:14.323665-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"153","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"197012039087","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Minute Order","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2025-10-17T16:07:30.749289-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-06T06:12:14.268873-07:00","date_filed":"2025-10-17","time_filed":"16:03:01","entry_number":153,"recap_sequence_number":"2025-10-17.001","pacer_sequence_number":512,"description":"MINUTE ORDER: The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Status Report, docket no. 152 . The stay in this matter shall remain in full force and effect pending further order of the Court. The parties are DIRECTED to file a Joint Status Report updating the Court as to the status of this case within fourteen (14) days after Defendants' anticipated petition for rehearing en banc has been resolved or by March 31, 2026, whichever comes first. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (CJS) (Entered: 10/17/2025)","tags":[]}],"entries_total":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/?count=on&docket=61471283&page_size=40"}